Notebookcheck Logo

Acer's quiet Nitro 17 laptop reviewed: The RTX 4060, perfectly configured

Quiet times.

The gaming laptop's i7-13700H and the RTX 4060 are perfectly suited to modern games. And, on top of that, the Nitro 17 hardly suffers from any weaknesses. So far, so predictable. The clever power management implementation makes all the difference and ensures Acer's laptop is quiet despite its power.

The Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER is a solid, mid-range gaming laptop. With an Intel Core i7 instead of an i9, only four zones on the RGB keyboard and a lot of plastic, compromises are necessary, but they help keep the RRP below $2000.

In return, Acer advertizes the laptop as having stable frame rates the kind of which can be expected from a well-configured Nvidia GeForce RTX 4000 series device. Almost even more crucial is the reputedly perfect cooling. Four air vents, liquid metal cooling and easy-to-use control software provide a strong basis for this.

Fortunately, a few annoying weaknesses found in its direct predecessor, the Acer Nitro 5 AN517, are now nowhere to be seen. They won't be missed.

Our review reveals how well the Nitro 17 stands up to competitors such as the Medion Erazer Defender P40 or the Lenovo Legion Pro 5. Both laptops share similar specs to our review device and come equipped with an RTX 4060 with a maximum TGP of 140 watts. Likewise, the cooling will have to prove itself in the test. 

Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER (Nitro 17 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i7-13700H 14 x 1.8 - 5 GHz, 115 W PL2 / Short Burst, 80 W PL1 / Sustained, Raptor Lake-H
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU - 8 GB VRAM, Core: 2250 MHz, RAM: 2000 MHz, 140 W TDP ( including 25 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR6, Game Ready 536.23, Advanced Optimus, MUX Switch
Memory
16 GB 
, DDR5-4800, Dual-Cannel, Samsung
Display
17.30 inch 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixel 170 PPI, BOE0B7C NE173QHM-NY6, glossy: no, 165 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH
Storage
Soundcard
Intel Raptor Lake-P/U/H PCH - cAVS
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 3 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: Headset, Card Reader: microSD
Networking
Killer E2600 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW) (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.1
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 30.3 x 401 x 299 ( = 1.19 x 15.79 x 11.77 in)
Battery
90 Wh Lithium-Ion
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
Webcam: 720p
Primary Camera: 1 MPix HD camera
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard Light: yes, NitroSense, Acer Care Center, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
3.03 kg ( = 106.88 oz / 6.68 pounds), Power Supply: 1.24 kg ( = 43.74 oz / 2.73 pounds)
Price
1900 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible competitors compared

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
87.2 %
v7 (old)
07 / 2023
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
3 kg30.3 mm17.30"2560x1440
87.9 %
v7 (old)
05 / 2023
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2.5 kg26.8 mm16.00"2560x1600
86.9 %
v7 (old)
06 / 2023
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
R9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S
2.2 kg22.1 mm16.00"1920x1200
85.9 %
v7 (old)
06 / 2023
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23)
i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
2.9 kg29.3 mm17.30"2560x1440
84.6 %
v7 (old)
05 / 2023
Medion Erazer Defender P40
i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2.9 kg33 mm17.30"2560x1440
83.9 %
v7 (old)
11 / 2022
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1
R7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
2.5 kg26.8 mm15.60"1920x1080
83.2 %
v7 (old)
01 / 2023
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
2.6 kg24.2 mm17.30"1920x1080

Case - An over-sized 17-inch laptop

The iridescent "N" on both the lid and below the display give away the Acer Nitro 17's gaming credentials. In addition, there are a few small color accents, but that's it. The search for LED lighting effects or colorful, stand-out elements on the sleek, plastic case, ends in vain.

The lack of metal components doesn't detract from the device's robustness. The case doesn't flex, can only be twisted minimally and, likewise, noises cannot be coaxed from it either. In addition, the display frame can only be bent slightly. The screen remains stable when being lifted or moved and can be opened to an angle of over 150°. Everything seems neatly put together.

At the same time, Acer's laptop is heavy and really big. Even among the 17-inch machines, it's hard to find another model that is thicker. Compared to its already big predecessor, the Acer Nitro 517, a few millimeters have been added. As seen in the previous gen model, the large cooling makes its presence felt. The laptop also continues to put weight on. Out-and-about, almost 4.3 kg have to lugged around as the PSU is also really heavy at 1.2 kg.

Together the laptop and PSU weigh 4.3 kg.
Only small external, visual details differentiate the device from its predecessor.

Size comparison

401 mm / 15.8 in 299 mm / 11.8 in 30.3 mm / 1.193 in 3 kg6.68 lbs397 mm / 15.6 in 264 mm / 10.4 in 33 mm / 1.299 in 2.9 kg6.36 lbs397 mm / 15.6 in 265 mm / 10.4 in 29.3 mm / 1.154 in 2.9 kg6.39 lbs398 mm / 15.7 in 273 mm / 10.7 in 24.2 mm / 0.953 in 2.6 kg5.71 lbs363.4 mm / 14.3 in 260.4 mm / 10.3 in 26.8 mm / 1.055 in 2.5 kg5.46 lbs360.4 mm / 14.2 in 271.1 mm / 10.7 in 26.8 mm / 1.055 in 2.5 kg5.51 lbs355 mm / 14 in 252 mm / 9.92 in 22.1 mm / 0.87 in 2.2 kg4.81 lbs297 mm / 11.7 in 210 mm / 8.27 in 1 mm / 0.03937 in 5.7 g0.01257 lbs

Features - No complaints with the Nitro 17

While criticism of its predecessor was justified for not having a card reader or a second USB-C port, the Acer Nitro 17 does everything right. All of the video outputs, including Thunderbolt 4, USB-C with DisplayPort support and HDMI, can be found on the rear of the device. On the left and right of the laptop, we have USB-A ports. Both of the right-hand ports even allow 10 Gbit/s, which is sufficient for, among other things, fast USB sticks and many portable SSDs.

It's a mystery why the card reader is only a microSD variant as there is more than enough space for a bigger one. The LAN port would also like to have managed 2.5 Gbit/s instead of only 1 Gbit/s. For the quality and price, the Acer Nitro 17's selection of ports is absolutely fine. The quantity and performance thereof should fit the task, regardless of the application scenario.

Left ports: 1 Gbit LAN, USB-A (5 Gbit/s), microSD slot, headset
Left ports: 1 Gbit LAN, USB-A (5 Gbit/s), microSD slot, headset
Right ports: 2 x USB-A (10 Gbit/s), Kensington lock
Right ports: 2 x USB-A (10 Gbit/s), Kensington lock
Rear ports: Power supply, HDMI, Thunderbolt 4, USB-C (10 Gbit/s, PD, DP)
Rear ports: Power supply, HDMI, Thunderbolt 4, USB-C (10 Gbit/s, PD, DP)

SD card reader

AS SSD
AS SSD

We obtained significantly below-average measurements with the AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60 reference card. The built-in microSD card reader is up to a third slower than the gaming laptop average.

For a 32 GB card that means there is an additional waiting time of more than 2 minutes when reading data. 

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Average of class Gaming
  (19 - 202, n=88, last 2 years)
95.9 MB/s +35%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
86 MB/s +21%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX
83.5 (74.23min - 83.48max) MB/s +17%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
Intel Core i7-13700H
71.2 MB/s
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Average of class Gaming
  (25.8 - 269, n=88, last 2 years)
120.1 MB/s +48%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
91 MB/s +12%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX
90.7 MB/s +12%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
Intel Core i7-13700H
81.1 MB/s

Communication

The WLAN module, for which we ascertained the expected results, is without critcism. However, Wi-Fi 6E is not on board, meaning multiple, overlapping networks will result in a considerable reduction in bandwidth.  

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)
1639 (1566min - 1713max) MBit/s
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1445 (1373min - 1515max) MBit/s -12%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1
Qualcomm WCN685x
1398 (1197min - 1589max) MBit/s -15%
Average Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)
  (947 - 1639, n=3)
1359 MBit/s -17%
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1308 (1166min - 1399max) MBit/s -20%
Average of class Gaming
  (469 - 1843, n=147, last 2 years)
1231 MBit/s -25%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23)
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
930 (678min - 980max) MBit/s -43%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
802 (579min - 1120max) MBit/s -51%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
Realtek RTL8852BE
776 (392min - 802max) MBit/s -53%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1734 (1706min - 1750max) MBit/s +23%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1
Qualcomm WCN685x
1665 (1427min - 1712max) MBit/s +18%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)
1408 (1385min - 1443max) MBit/s
Average of class Gaming
  (680 - 1890, n=147, last 2 years)
1399 MBit/s -1%
Average Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)
  (917 - 1717, n=3)
1347 MBit/s -4%
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1267 (1119min - 1343max) MBit/s -10%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1223 (1136min - 1272max) MBit/s -13%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23)
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
941 (935min - 947max) MBit/s -33%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
Realtek RTL8852BE
905 (765min - 969max) MBit/s -36%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550160016501700Tooltip
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW); iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1639 (1566-1713)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø802 (579-1120)
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1445 (1373-1515)
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1 Qualcomm WCN685x; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1398 (1197-1589)
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW); iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1408 (1385-1443)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1223 (1136-1272)
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1733 (1706-1750)
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1 Qualcomm WCN685x; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1665 (1427-1712)

Webcam

The basic HD camera is sufficient for undemanding video calls although the low resolution is apparent to the receiver. The strong color deviations we measured resulted from the camera's good brightening function. It adapted quickly to changing lighting conditions and delivered good-quality images, even in low light.  But, this is by no means really ideal and we would still recommend grabbing an external camera. 

Likewise, the microphone does its job satisfactorily. The sound is recorded at a consistent volume and can be easily heard both from varying distances and in multiple directions of speech. However, when adjusting the volume, it's difficult to ignore the tinny undertone and slight distortions.

ColorChecker
20.9 ∆E
28.2 ∆E
24.2 ∆E
26.9 ∆E
27.4 ∆E
22.2 ∆E
27.7 ∆E
28 ∆E
19.2 ∆E
15 ∆E
18.8 ∆E
26.5 ∆E
24.1 ∆E
28.3 ∆E
23.2 ∆E
19.8 ∆E
25.4 ∆E
34.6 ∆E
0.6 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
21.1 ∆E
27.7 ∆E
30.2 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER: 22.61 ∆E min: 0.59 - max: 34.6 ∆E

Maintenance

Eleven, easily accessible crosshead screws have to be removed, allowing the base plate to be prised off with little resistance. The best place to start seems to be the rear connecting console since there are very few plastic clips which additionally secure the base. No additional tools are necessary.

The internals are quite roomy which is not surprising considering the space on offer. There is a slot for an additional M.2 NVMe SSD. WLAN, the first SSD and RAM are just as easily accessed as the battery and can also be swapped relatively effortlessly. 

What is noticeable compared to the predecessor is the lack of additional heat sinks over the SSD slot. On top of that, the RAM's cooling pad in our review device is glued over the mass storage connector. This influenced our stress test and can be seen below. By contrast, the gaming benchmarks remain largely unaffected by this.  

Wi-Fi module
Wi-Fi module
M.2 NVMe SSD
M.2 NVMe SSD
a second, free SSD slot
a second, free SSD slot

Input devices - Made for a gaming laptop

The typically flat-format, rubber dome keyboard made the kind of very positive impression you would associate with such an input device. The key travel of 1.4 mm (our measurement) ensures a pleasant typing experience but the resistance could be a bit firmer. Since the keyboard frame only flexes minimally when energetic typing pressure is applied, sustained typing sessions are not a problem.

The key's white sides are visually striking and their high contrast really makes them stand out. Furthermore, the "WASD" keys, arrow keys and the special key for the NitroSense software have additional highlighting. The key lighting is even but the customisation options are limited to four zones and a few effects. A wide range of colors makes these look pretty good.

Conversely, the touchpad is a disappointment. At almost 8 x 12 cm, it is well-proportioned but its accuracy as well as the pressure points of the hidden keys in the bottom area are less than impressive. In addition, we noticed a slight clattering sound when placing and lifting our fingers. Therefore, we definitely recommend using a separate mouse. 

Four customizable zones should be sufficient.
Four customizable zones should be sufficient.

Display - All in all, just the ticket for gaming

Subpixels
Subpixels
Screen bleeding
Screen bleeding

The Nitro 17's IPS panel can no longer be said to possess the latent weaknesses seen in the previous generation model. A great deal of effort is required to be able to make out individual pixels on the QHD resolution, 17.3-inch display. Normal work can also be done on the device without having to increase the size of either text or symbols. 

The 165 Hz frame rate is also pretty perfect for gaming. Response times are also very decent. In addition, the screen displays strong, vibrant colors which are accurately reproduced even without the need for calibration. At 360 cd/m², the brightness is also more than sufficient for desktop use.   

However, the contrast could be better and looks poor due to a black level value of only 600:1. This is especially noticeable in a completely dark room. A black background is always slightly illuminated and visible screen bleeding is present on the top right of the display. 

Of course, it is possible to find displays with more colors, more frames per second, and higher pixel density but, for a mid-range gaming laptop, the image values are very coherent.

315
cd/m²
315
cd/m²
318
cd/m²
320
cd/m²
361
cd/m²
318
cd/m²
317
cd/m²
352
cd/m²
314
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
BOE0B7C NE173QHM-NY6 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 361 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 325.6 cd/m² Minimum: 4.4 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 360 cd/m²
Contrast: 602:1 (Black: 0.6 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.83 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.9, calibrated: 3.48
ΔE Greyscale 3.29 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
85.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.29
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
BOE0B7C NE173QHM-NY6, , 2560x1440, 17.3"
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
AU Optronics B160QAN03.1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
BOE NE160WUM-NX2, IPS, 1920x1200, 16"
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23)
BOE09F9 NE173QHM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3"
Medion Erazer Defender P40
BOE CQ NE173QHM-NZ3, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3"
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1
AU Optronics B156HAN12.H, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Sharp LQ173M1JW08, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"
Display
-14%
-17%
-1%
-17%
-17%
-14%
Display P3 Coverage
98.3
71.2
-28%
69.3
-30%
96.6
-2%
68.3
-31%
68.8
-30%
71.9
-27%
sRGB Coverage
100
98.8
-1%
97.3
-3%
99.9
0%
98.1
-2%
98.1
-2%
99.9
0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
85.7
73.3
-14%
70.7
-18%
84.5
-1%
69.8
-19%
69.7
-19%
73.7
-14%
Response Times
-14%
-15%
-23%
-4%
6%
15%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
14.8 ?(7, 7.8)
14.5 ?(7, 7.5)
2%
15.6 ?(7.3, 8.3)
-5%
16.4 ?(7.4, 9)
-11%
14.6 ?(7.1, 7.5)
1%
13 ?(6, 7)
12%
4.6 ?(2.2, 2.4)
69%
Response Time Black / White *
8 ?(3.4, 4.6)
10.4 ?(5.7, 4.7)
-30%
10 ?(5.7, 4.3)
-25%
10.8 ?(4.6, 6.2)
-35%
8.7 ?(3.6, 5.1)
-9%
8 ?(4, 4)
-0%
11.2 ?(6.8, 4.4)
-40%
PWM Frequency
Screen
41%
41%
28%
45%
19%
4%
Brightness middle
361
405.7
12%
301
-17%
349
-3%
364
1%
327
-9%
337.7
-6%
Brightness
326
368
13%
294
-10%
318
-2%
343
5%
320
-2%
331
2%
Brightness Distribution
87
87
0%
94
8%
82
-6%
86
-1%
93
7%
82
-6%
Black Level *
0.6
0.38
37%
0.21
65%
0.56
7%
0.28
53%
0.24
60%
0.31
48%
Contrast
602
1068
77%
1433
138%
623
3%
1300
116%
1363
126%
1089
81%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.83
1.65
57%
1.79
53%
1.08
72%
1.67
56%
3.26
15%
4.12
-8%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
5.71
4.2
26%
3.48
39%
3.05
47%
2.78
51%
8.73
-53%
8.89
-56%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
3.48
0.53
85%
1.2
66%
1.08
69%
1.14
67%
0.87
75%
0.98
72%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.29
1.2
64%
2.5
24%
1.14
65%
1.4
57%
4.87
-48%
6.3
-91%
Gamma
2.29 96%
2.3 96%
2.265 97%
2.41 91%
2.091 105%
2.3 96%
2.48 89%
CCT
6679 97%
6453 101%
6157 106%
6687 97%
6568 99%
7070 92%
6542 99%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
4% / 21%
3% / 20%
1% / 15%
8% / 25%
3% / 9%
2% / 2%

* ... smaller is better

In terms of color reproduction, the Acer Nitro 17 does an excellent job. The sRGB color space - which is important for gaming - is covered completely. Even DCI P3, which is used in film production, is almost completely reproduced.

In comparison to similar gaming-focused laptops, these are excellent results.  

100 % sRGB
100 % sRGB
98 % DCI P3
98 % DCI P3
86 % AdobeRGB
86 % AdobeRGB
Better black levels and slight lower DeltaE at 50% brightness
Better black levels and slight lower DeltaE at 50% brightness

After reducing the brightness to 50 %, the 0.21 black level (instead of 0.59), is much better. In doing so, the contrast also increases to almost 900:1. Especially in the evening, when full brightness is normally not a must, the image reproduction improves accordingly. Even the color deviation DeltaE of 3.5 is lower than at full brightness.  

We measured a DelatE deviation of 3.8 from the desired color reproduction. A calibration didn't lead to further improvements. Although well-trained eyes can make out discrepancies, especially when it comes to yellow and orange tones, there is nothing wrong with the color reproduction.

As long as the user doesn't intend to the device for professional photo or video editing, the display reproduces colors very naturally.  

Gray scales
Gray scales
Saturation
Saturation
ColorChecker
ColorChecker
Gray scales calibrated
Gray scales calibrated
Saturation calibrated
Saturation calibrated
ColorChecker calibrated
ColorChecker calibrated

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3.4 ms rise
↘ 4.6 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 19 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
14.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7 ms rise
↘ 7.8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 25 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8687 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Outdoors, on a balcony or in a shaded area in the garden, text and even photos are legible. Of course, the colors don't appear, as desired. As expected, not much can be seen in sunlight, but text is legible - just. 

Colors outdoors, in the shade
Colors outdoors, in the shade
Text outdoors, in the shade
Text outdoors, in the shade
Text outdoors, in sunlight
Text outdoors, in sunlight

Even from an acute angle, no color deviations can be seen. A slight gray haze covers the image from an angle of around 45°.

Performance - The Nitro 17 sits in the middle of the gaming pack

With the 13th generation of the Intel Core i7 (Raptor Lake) and the Nvidia GeForce RTX 4060, most current games are playable at the display's native QHD resolution, but with a few limitations here and there. As long as your demands are not set too high, the gaming laptop will provide great entertainment for quite some time.

In addition to our review candidate, there are currently a few other variants of the Nitro 17 available that come with either the Intel Core i5-13500H or the i7-13700H as well as the RTX 4050 or an RTX 4060. Current titles should easily be playable with the lowest spec model, albeit at Full HD. 

CPU-Z main page
CPU-Z main page
CPU-Z mainboard
CPU-Z mainboard
CPU-Z SPD
CPU-Z SPD
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO
HWiNFO
 
 
 

Test conditions

Various scenarios can be defined by using the NitroSense software. While the CPU and GPU's behaviour is set to four possible operating modes, fan behaviour, key lighting and sound profile can be selected accordingly.

For a realistic determination of the benchmarks, we selected the "Performance" mode. Acer recommends this in its instructions for optimum operation, also over extended periods of time. The fan noise in "Turbo" is much louder. In our tests, we were able to achieve nearly identical test results in both "Balanced" and "Performance" modes at roughly half the noise level. However, the performance dip in "Quiet" is considerable while the fans remain audible, at the very least.

This means the balanced operating mode ought to be ideal for most application scenarios. The sound in games, via the built-in speakers, is perfectly audible and the fan noise is not particularly annoying.

TurboPerformanceBalancedQuiet
CPU PL2
115 watts
115 watts
115 watts
115 watts
CPU PL1
100 watts
80 watts
70 watts
45 watts
Volume (Time Spy)
58 dB
55 dB
43 dB
38 dB
Score (Time Spy)
11,04210,75910,6084,210


Acer's NitroSense control software
Acer's NitroSense control software

Processor

With the Intel Core i7-13700, the Acer Nitro 17 has gone for a very powerful but not superlative CPU. Its design largely corresponds to the predecessor, the i7-12700H with six performance and eight efficiency cores making a total of 20 threads. The cache has also remained the same size. In contrast, the clock rate has seen a slight improvement from 4.7 to 5.0 GHz.

Other gaming laptops can fall back on a better-specced CPU, for example, the Intel Core i7-13700HX. However, that means the cooling has to be done right. For instance, a Medion Erazer Defender P40 began our CineBench R15 continuous loop with 10 % better values but was neck and neck after the second run. In the end, the Nitro 17 was almost 20 % better. In this regard, the continuous performance is on an impressively high level.  

Conversely, for many processes and tasks, the power available for a short time counts. In this respect, the i7-13700H is powerful for a mobile CPU but it is left standing by the 7th generation AMD processors or even the "HX" series Intel models. A similar picture emerged when it came to single-core performance. Being limited to 115 watts instead of up to the 157 watts seen in the "HX" series prevents better results. In addition, in "Performance" mode, a sudden reduction in power consumption takes place which explains the below-average results in this area. However, regarding the gaming rating, this doesn't play a decisive role. 

You can find further information and measurement data in our CPU benchmark list.

Cinebench R15 Multi Continuous Test

0225450675900112513501575180020252250247527002925315033753600382540504275Tooltip
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER Intel Core i7-13700H: Ø2728 (2664.71-2893.73)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX: Ø3057 (3008.42-3230.23)
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS: Ø2646 (2596.9-2666.67)
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX: Ø3815 (3467.41-4465.28)
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX: Ø2369 (2270.92-3189.19)
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H: Ø2153 (2083.98-2206.17)
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø2511 (2457.61-2693.6)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX
83.7 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
73.4 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX
69.1 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
67.1 pt
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX
64 pt
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H
61.5 pt
Average Intel Core i7-13700H
 
59.2 pt
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
Intel Core i7-13700H
58.5 pt
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
53.2 pt
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX
26884 Points +43%
Average of class Gaming
  (5668 - 36249, n=187, last 2 years)
22019 Points +17%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX
20341 Points +8%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX
19987 (10270.1min - 19987.3max) Points +6%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
Intel Core i7-13700H
18843 Points
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H
17075 (15585.9min - 17075max) Points -9%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
16907 Points -10%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H
  (5890 - 20034, n=28)
15266 Points -19%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
13623 Points -28%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX
2006 Points +30%
Average of class Gaming
  (1136 - 2235, n=185, last 2 years)
1893 Points +22%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H
  (1323 - 1914, n=28)
1797 Points +16%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
1791 Points +16%
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H
1711 Points +10%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX
1668 Points +8%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX
1666 Points +8%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
Intel Core i7-13700H
1549 Points
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
1542 Points 0%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX
10132 Points +44%
Average of class Gaming
  (2179 - 13832, n=185, last 2 years)
8379 Points +19%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX
7710 Points +10%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
Intel Core i7-13700H
7041 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX
6889 Points -2%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
6571 Points -7%
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H
6570 Points -7%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H
  (2322 - 7674, n=28)
5945 Points -16%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
5311 Points -25%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX
771 Points +30%
Average of class Gaming
  (439 - 856, n=185, last 2 years)
727 Points +22%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
702 Points +18%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H
  (508 - 741, n=28)
693 Points +17%
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H
664 Points +12%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX
652 Points +10%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX
644 Points +8%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
605 Points +2%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
Intel Core i7-13700H
594 Points
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX
4465 (3467.41min - 4465.28max) Points +54%
Average of class Gaming
  (905 - 5663, n=192, last 2 years)
3445 Points +19%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX
3230 (3008.42min - 3230.23max) Points +12%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX
3189 Points +10%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
Intel Core i7-13700H
2894 (2664.71min - 2893.73max) Points
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H
2694 (2457.61min - 2693.6max) Points -7%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
2666.7 Points -8%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H
  (905 - 2982, n=28)
2455 Points -15%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
2206.17 Points -24%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX
284 Points +27%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
283 Points +27%
Average of class Gaming
  (191.9 - 318, n=189, last 2 years)
278 Points +25%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX
265 Points +19%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H
  (213 - 278, n=28)
260 Points +17%
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H
255 Points +14%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
248 Points +11%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX
243 Points +9%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
Intel Core i7-13700H
223 Points
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
234 Seconds * -29%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H
  (169 - 555, n=28)
229 Seconds * -26%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX
198 Seconds * -9%
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H
190 Seconds * -4%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
189 Seconds * -4%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
Intel Core i7-13700H
182 Seconds *
Average of class Gaming
  (87 - 555, n=180, last 2 years)
169 Seconds * +7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX
151 Seconds * +17%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX
125 Seconds * +31%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX
105324 MIPS +48%
Average of class Gaming
  (23795 - 140932, n=184, last 2 years)
85971 MIPS +21%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX
78076 MIPS +10%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX
72220 MIPS +1%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
Intel Core i7-13700H
71260 MIPS
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
70081 MIPS -2%
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H
65292 MIPS -8%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
61342 MIPS -14%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H
  (27322 - 76344, n=28)
61025 MIPS -14%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX
6747 MIPS +37%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
6621 MIPS +34%
Average of class Gaming
  (4199 - 7581, n=184, last 2 years)
6324 MIPS +28%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H
  (4825 - 6238, n=28)
5858 MIPS +19%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
5720 MIPS +16%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX
5718 MIPS +16%
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H
5672 MIPS +15%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX
5552 MIPS +13%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
Intel Core i7-13700H
4933 MIPS
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX
18109 Points +38%
Average of class Gaming
  (4557 - 23194, n=185, last 2 years)
15135 Points +16%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX
14222 Points +9%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX
14144 Points +8%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
Intel Core i7-13700H
13090 Points
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
12111 Points -7%
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H
11979 Points -8%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H
  (6165 - 14215, n=28)
11777 Points -10%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
9392 Points -28%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
2032 Points +33%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX
1944 Points +27%
Average of class Gaming
  (986 - 2210, n=185, last 2 years)
1899 Points +24%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H
  (1362 - 1919, n=28)
1792 Points +17%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX
1777 Points +16%
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H
1683 Points +10%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX
1666 Points +9%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
1549 Points +1%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
Intel Core i7-13700H
1527 Points
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX
27.9 fps +40%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX
24.2 fps +22%
Average of class Gaming
  (6.72 - 38.9, n=184, last 2 years)
23.6 fps +19%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX
20.8 fps +5%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
20.8 fps +5%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
Intel Core i7-13700H
19.9 fps
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H
19 fps -5%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
16.7 fps -16%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H
  (6.72 - 21.2, n=28)
16.7 fps -16%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
Intel Core i7-13700H
55.8 s *
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX
50.8 s * +9%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
50.6 s * +9%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX
49.8 s * +11%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H
  (31.3 - 62.4, n=28)
48.2 s * +14%
Average of class Gaming
  (19 - 96.6, n=181, last 2 years)
47.3 s * +15%
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H
45.8 s * +18%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
41.7 s * +25%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX
36.5 s * +35%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
Intel Core i7-13700H
0.536 sec *
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX
0.493 sec * +8%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
0.4876 sec * +9%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX
0.4769 sec * +11%
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H
0.473 sec * +12%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H
  (0.4308 - 0.607, n=28)
0.4651 sec * +13%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.3609 - 0.759, n=185, last 2 years)
0.4362 sec * +19%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
0.4253 sec * +21%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX
0.4234 sec * +21%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2894 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
208 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
223 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
7041 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
594 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
1549 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
18843 Points
Help
Performance Rating
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
88.6 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S
86.3 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
83.5 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
78.6 pt
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
74.3 pt
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
71.2 pt
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
67.2 pt
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
63.1 pt
Average Intel Core i7-13700H
 
59.4 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S
28033 KRay/s +53%
Average of class Gaming
  (4986 - 60169, n=181, last 2 years)
22026 KRay/s +20%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
21492 KRay/s +17%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
20413 KRay/s +11%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
18335 KRay/s
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
16483 KRay/s -10%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
16101 KRay/s -12%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
15397 KRay/s -16%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H
  (4986 - 18908, n=28)
14011 KRay/s -24%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S
122098 Points +38%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
110631 Points +25%
Average of class Gaming
  (25360 - 252486, n=181, last 2 years)
107276 Points +22%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
103903 Points +18%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
100983 Points +15%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
88187 Points
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
80935 Points -8%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
77807 Points -12%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H
  (25360 - 92359, n=28)
70414 Points -20%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
5395 MB/s +28%
Average of class Gaming
  (1339 - 10389, n=181, last 2 years)
4933 MB/s +17%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
4633 MB/s +10%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S
4566 MB/s +8%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
4224 MB/s
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
3854 MB/s -9%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
3412 MB/s -19%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
3364 MB/s -20%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H
  (1339 - 4224, n=28)
3272 MB/s -23%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
134893 Points +35%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S
124433 Points +25%
Average of class Gaming
  (50699 - 200651, n=181, last 2 years)
117382 Points +17%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
113990 Points +14%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
113837 Points +14%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
106229 Points +6%
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
103119 Points +3%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
99940 Points
Average Intel Core i7-13700H
  (68763 - 107159, n=28)
98096 Points -2%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S
15380 Points +48%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
13832 Points +33%
Average of class Gaming
  (4800 - 32988, n=181, last 2 years)
13326 Points +28%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
13285 Points +28%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
13120 Points +26%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
10416 Points
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
10407 Points 0%
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
9811 Points -6%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H
  (4800 - 11050, n=28)
8871 Points -15%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S
63432 Points +44%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
55594 Points +26%
Average of class Gaming
  (12321 - 134044, n=181, last 2 years)
53979 Points +22%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
53409 Points +21%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
50250 Points +14%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
44093 Points
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
39765 Points -10%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
38311 Points -13%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H
  (12321 - 45118, n=28)
34551 Points -22%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
151254 MB/s
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
137201 MB/s -9%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
134500 MB/s -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (19065 - 328679, n=181, last 2 years)
109221 MB/s -28%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
103076 MB/s -32%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
94177 MB/s -38%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S
86309 MB/s -43%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H
  (28769 - 151254, n=28)
76444 MB/s -49%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
72510 MB/s -52%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
1581 MB/s +30%
Average of class Gaming
  (373 - 2409, n=181, last 2 years)
1373 MB/s +13%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
1339 MB/s +10%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
1215 MB/s
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
1089 MB/s -10%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S
1089 MB/s -10%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
981 MB/s -19%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H
  (389 - 1215, n=28)
945 MB/s -22%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
871 MB/s -28%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S
15209 KRay/s +61%
Average of class Gaming
  (2540 - 31796, n=181, last 2 years)
11862 KRay/s +26%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
11608 KRay/s +23%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
11057 KRay/s +17%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
9441 KRay/s
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
8867 KRay/s -6%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
8609 KRay/s -9%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
8145 KRay/s -14%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H
  (2540 - 10135, n=28)
7510 KRay/s -20%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
49738 MPixel/s +31%
Average of class Gaming
  (10805 - 60161, n=182, last 2 years)
40511 MPixel/s +7%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H
  (12872 - 52727, n=28)
40281 MPixel/s +6%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
37987 MPixel/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
36147 MPixel/s -5%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
36118 MPixel/s -5%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S
29922 MPixel/s -21%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
28224 MPixel/s -26%
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
27269 MPixel/s -28%

System Performance

When surfing the internet, creating, rendering and more, the performance remains consistently high. Waiting times are short and loading processes, the installation or de-installation of programs don't present the system with any particular problems. In terms of the PCMark and CrossMark scores, there seems to be a slight advantage to using the balanced mode. The low heat production as a result of the limited power consumption during repeated load, really shows its advantages. This means this processor even manages to sit noticeably above the values we recorded in all our tested i7-13700H processors. 

PCMark 10 / Score
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
7927 Points +11%
Average of class Gaming
  (5776 - 9852, n=163, last 2 years)
7825 Points +9%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N
7691 Points +7%
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
7647 Points +7%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H (Ausgeglichen)
7628 Points +7%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (7157 - 7661, n=5)
7452 Points +4%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7157 Points
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
6956 Points -3%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
6909 Points -3%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 6800H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
6783 Points -5%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
10926 Points +7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N
10872 Points +7%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
10844 Points +7%
Average of class Gaming
  (9057 - 12600, n=162, last 2 years)
10842 Points +7%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (10179 - 11200, n=5)
10775 Points +6%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H (Ausgeglichen)
10613 Points +4%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 6800H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
10343 Points +2%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10179 Points
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
9865 Points -3%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
9760 Points -4%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
10505 Points +28%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H (Ausgeglichen)
10249 Points +24%
Average of class Gaming
  (6662 - 14612, n=162, last 2 years)
9918 Points +20%
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
9877 Points +20%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
9760 Points +18%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
9470 Points +15%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (8238 - 10249, n=5)
9406 Points +14%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N
9131 Points +11%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 6800H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
8991 Points +9%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
8238 Points
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N
12434 Points +5%
Average of class Gaming
  (6807 - 18475, n=162, last 2 years)
12205 Points +3%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
11868 Points 0%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
11862 Points
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
11245 Points -5%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (10308 - 11862, n=5)
11121 Points -6%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H (Ausgeglichen)
11075 Points -7%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
9776 Points -18%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
9393 Points -21%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 6800H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
9108 Points -23%
CrossMark / Overall
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
2029 Points +25%
Average of class Gaming
  (1247 - 2344, n=143, last 2 years)
1915 Points +18%
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
1844 Points +13%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
1774 Points +9%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
1774 Points +9%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (1629 - 1849, n=5)
1715 Points +5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N
1663 Points +2%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H (Ausgeglichen)
1640 Points +1%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1629 Points
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 6800H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
1522 Points -7%
CrossMark / Productivity
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
1872 Points +20%
Average of class Gaming
  (1299 - 2204, n=143, last 2 years)
1813 Points +16%
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
1785 Points +14%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
1715 Points +10%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
1643 Points +5%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (1561 - 1743, n=5)
1639 Points +5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N
1618 Points +4%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H (Ausgeglichen)
1580 Points +1%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1561 Points
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 6800H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
1530 Points -2%
CrossMark / Creativity
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
2310 Points +37%
Average of class Gaming
  (1275 - 2660, n=143, last 2 years)
2104 Points +24%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
1992 Points +18%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
1990 Points +18%
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
1912 Points +13%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (1691 - 2064, n=5)
1873 Points +11%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H (Ausgeglichen)
1766 Points +4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N
1710 Points +1%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1691 Points
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 6800H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
1589 Points -6%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
1824 Points +10%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
1752 Points +6%
Average of class Gaming
  (1030 - 2330, n=143, last 2 years)
1711 Points +3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N
1663 Points 0%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1656 Points
Medion Erazer Defender P40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
1577 Points -5%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (1381 - 1656, n=5)
1515 Points -9%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H (Ausgeglichen)
1471 Points -11%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
1388 Points -16%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 6800H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
1316 Points -21%
PCMark 10 Score
7157 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
77068 MB/s +34%
Average of class Gaming
  (21842 - 94222, n=181, last 2 years)
65865 MB/s +14%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H
  (24334 - 78081, n=28)
62480 MB/s +9%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S
59712 MB/s +4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
58458 MB/s +2%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
57552 MB/s
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
57466 MB/s 0%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
49061 MB/s -15%
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
45358 MB/s -21%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
84677 MB/s +30%
Average of class Gaming
  (23681 - 99713, n=181, last 2 years)
69737 MB/s +7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
67644 MB/s +4%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
67639 MB/s +4%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H
  (23681 - 79656, n=28)
65892 MB/s +1%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
65092 MB/s
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S
61609 MB/s -5%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
50640 MB/s -22%
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
49450 MB/s -24%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
74791 MB/s +16%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S
72541 MB/s +12%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H
  (22986 - 99898, n=28)
68690 MB/s +6%
Average of class Gaming
  (22986 - 108954, n=181, last 2 years)
67587 MB/s +4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
65896 MB/s +2%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
64704 MB/s
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
57744 MB/s -11%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
55113 MB/s -15%
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
46603 MB/s -28%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
136.8 ns *
Average Intel Core i7-13700H
  (82.4 - 136.8, n=28)
94.1 ns * +31%
Average of class Gaming
  (59.5 - 259, n=181, last 2 years)
94.1 ns * +31%
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
93.7 ns * +32%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
93 ns * +32%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
91.1 ns * +33%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S
90.4 ns * +34%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
89.6 ns * +35%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
81.9 ns * +40%

* ... smaller is better

DPC latencies

The Nitro 17 is not necessarily suitable for real-time audio editing but it was still able to handle it with minimal glitches. All in all, the results were good. Also, when it came to 4K video playback, we were unable to detect any dropped frames.

Driver updates and software changes could both significantly improve or worsen performance compared to our determined results. 

LatencyMon results
LatencyMon results
LatencyMon driver list
LatencyMon driver list
4K YouTube video streaming
4K YouTube video streaming
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 6800H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
4853 μs * -236%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
4343.1 μs * -201%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1444 μs *
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
1128.7 μs * +22%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
971 μs * +33%
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
950 μs * +34%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N
869.7 μs * +40%

* ... smaller is better

Mass storage

The RAM's cooling is glued to the SSD's connector.
The RAM's cooling is glued to the SSD's connector.

In our performance tests, Samsung's PCIe 4.0 SSD returned impressive results, putting itself quite some distance from the competition, especially when it came to the read and write speeds of 4 kbit blocks.

By contrast, the sequential read endurance test result was really poor. After initially acceptable transfer speeds, the values fell to less than 500 MB/s (red line) which represents a fraction of the possible theoretical performance. The removal of the cooling pad from the RAM - which reached as far as the SSD's controller in our test device - brought about a 50 % improvement (black line). If the fans are set to maximum, the SSD finally behaves as you would expect (yellow line).

The comparison with the Lenovo Legion Pro 5 shows how the test should go. The cooling, which was found on the predecessor's base plate, is missing here and is something clearly reflected in our results. 

However, this appears to have a negligible influence on the gaming performance. At the very least, we weren't able to determine any deviations to speak of, compared to competitors equipped with similar hardware.  

Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
Sequential Read: 4853MB/s
Sequential Write: 4373MB/s
4K Read: 73.43MB/s
4K Write: 234.6MB/s
4K-64 Read: 2718MB/s
4K-64 Write: 2745MB/s
Access Time Write: 0.019ms
Score Read: 3277Points
Score Write: 3417Points
Score Total: 8345Points
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23)
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
 
Average of class Gaming
 
Drive Performance Rating
Percent
88.1
85.5
-3%
42.1
-52%
73.3
-17%
75.8
-14%
73.1
-17%
79.4
-10%
74.7
-15%
73.1
-17%
DiskSpd
-6%
-50%
-11%
-7%
-11%
-1%
-11%
-11%
seq read
3670
5346
46%
2253
-39%
3510
-4%
2501
-32%
3770
3%
3889
6%
seq write
4284
1495
-65%
1671
-61%
3961
-8%
4675
9%
4216
-2%
4579
7%
3575 ?(2220 - 4564, n=86)
-17%
seq q8 t1 read
5276
7127
35%
4294
-19%
6520
24%
5009
-5%
6689
27%
6697
27%
seq q8 t1 write
5114
4903
-4%
1773
-65%
4907
-4%
4797
-6%
4664
-9%
4956
-3%
4k q1 t1 read
70.6
65.9
-7%
32.8
-54%
53.6
-24%
51.1
-28%
59.5
-16%
69.8
-1%
4k q1 t1 write
267
328
23%
132
-51%
205
-23%
281
5%
151.1
-43%
263
-1%
188.2 ?(49.9 - 280, n=86)
-30%
4k q32 t16 read
3726
2889
-22%
1705
-54%
2835
-24%
3335
-10%
2819
-24%
2861
-23%
2561 ?(376 - 4185, n=86)
-31%
4k q32 t16 write
3355
1457
-57%
1585
-53%
2664
-21%
3737
11%
2670
-20%
2700
-20%
1940 ?(291 - 3559, n=86)
-42%
AS SSD
-7%
-94%
-22%
-17%
-20%
-31%
-20%
-27%
Score Total
8345
9125
9%
4261
-49%
6631
-21%
7599
-9%
7145
-14%
7307
-12%
6855 ?(2577 - 9147, n=85)
-18%
Score Read
3277
3235
-1%
1830
-44%
2593
-21%
2625
-20%
2804
-14%
2792
-15%
2417 ?(983 - 3469, n=85)
-26%
Score Write
3417
4288
25%
1604
-53%
2674
-22%
3618
6%
2979
-13%
3117
-9%
Seq Read
4853
5856.12
21%
3690.93
-24%
3344
-31%
3667.76
-24%
4920.82
1%
4843.81
0%
Seq Write
4373
4750.28
9%
1633.49
-63%
4175
-5%
3884.67
-11%
3550.64
-19%
4200.32
-4%
3320 ?(1617 - 4526, n=85)
-24%
4K Read
73.43
77.12
5%
42.75
-42%
53.4
-27%
63.89
-13%
56.67
-23%
67.56
-8%
4K Write
234.6
276.66
18%
118.17
-50%
177.9
-24%
207.32
-12%
135.96
-42%
213.7
-9%
4K-64 Read
2718
2572.63
-5%
1429.83
-47%
2205
-19%
2194.79
-19%
2254.97
-17%
2240.41
-18%
1855 ?(421 - 2854, n=85)
-32%
4K-64 Write
2745
3536.78
29%
1411.25
-49%
2078
-24%
3021.8
10%
2488.35
-9%
2483.08
-10%
Access Time Read *
0.044
0.058
0.03
0.08
0.057
0.038
Access Time Write *
0.019
0.053
-179%
0.118
-521%
0.023
-21%
0.033
-74%
0.029
-53%
0.061
-221%
0.03406 ?(0.017 - 0.101, n=85)
-79%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-5% / -6%
-65% / -73%
-17% / -17%
-13% / -12%
-16% / -16%
-14% / -17%
-15% / -16%
-18% / -20%

* ... smaller is better

Continuous performance Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

036072010801440180021602520288032403600396043204680504054005760612064806840Tooltip
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR: Ø1096 (492.06-6187.02)
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER  ; Maximale Lüftung: Ø4658 (4190.75-6818.26)
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER  ; Kühlpad versetzt: Ø1462 (754.72-6971.15)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N: Ø6448 (5744.31-7139.12)

Graphics card

The GPU's power consumption using the various modes, in order from "Quiet" to "Turbo"
The GPU's power consumption using the various modes, in order from "Quiet" to "Turbo"

The RTX 4060 is a mid-range GPU that can reliably compete with the previous generation's RTX 3070 Ti. That is remarkable as the number of shaders as well as the various cores for ray tracing or tensor calculations have been reduced by something approaching 50 %. At 8 GB, only the VRAM has remained the same and could be a little meagre, especially when it comes to 4K resolutions  - at least for individual game titles.

The Acer Nitro 17's graphics chip is supplied with a maximum of 140 watts, whereby 25 watts are diverted from the processor as a dynamic boost. The graphic on the right shows the value in the "Turbo" mode is also stable in the long term. In the other modes, the power consumption is reduced. In "Quiet", 85 watts are required. In "Balanced" mode, 105 watts are permitted and in "Performance", a maximum of 130 watts are accessed. Battery mode is missing in the diagram. We subsequently recorded 15 watts which are sufficient even for The Witcher 3 at the highest detail settings.

The 3DMark was carried out at a maximum power supply of 130 watts ("Performance" mode) and sat at a level comparable to competitors such as the Erazer Defender P40 or Legion Pro 5 with an identical GPU. Also in this area, the balanced mode results are partially better than those recorded in the performance mode although the graphics card is only supplied with 105 watts. Since the processor is simultaneously not completely responsible for heat production, the GPU can reliably run in this mode at maximum power. By contrast, in the "Performance" mode, when the critical temperature is reached, the clock speed is limited for a short period and that is something that doesn't happen as quickly in the balanced mode. 

In an extensive analysis of the current Nvidia RTX-4000 GPUs, we highlighted that the low-spec RTX 4050 and RTX 4060 barely experience a performance boost when the power consumption is increased to over 100 watts.

You can find additional benchmarks and information in our GPU benchmark list.

Time Spy (Turbo)
Time Spy (Turbo)
Time Spy (Performance)
Time Spy (Performance)
Time Spy (Balanced)
Time Spy (Balanced)
Time Spy (Quiet)
Time Spy (Quiet)
Time Spy (Battery mode)
Time Spy (Battery mode
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming
 
97.7 pt
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
89.9 pt
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
88.8 pt
Medion Erazer Defender P40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX
86.3 pt
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
85.5 pt
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
85.2 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 -1!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX
83.9 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
 
82.4 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
81.3 pt
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK -1!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
75.9 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72178, n=181, last 2 years)
44043 Points +23%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
40776 Points +14%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX
37654 Points +5%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
37084 Points +4%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX
36470 Points +2%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H (Ausgeglichen)
35770 Points 0%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
35731 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (28136 - 38912, n=56)
34832 Points -3%
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
33048 Points -8%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
33037 Points -8%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H (Ausgeglichen)
159463 Points +1%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
158354 Points
Medion Erazer Defender P40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX
157190 Points -1%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
155806 Points -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (81407 - 180228, n=28)
149832 Points -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (15902 - 193851, n=101, last 2 years)
144496 Points -9%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
139201 Points -12%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
130117 Points -18%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=193, last 2 years)