Intel Core i5-10300H vs. AMD Ryzen 7 3750H: Another sideways step for Intel
Laptops sporting Intel 10th gen Comet Lake-H processors are now out in the wild meaning we can finally benchmark these CPUs in-house without relying on numbers provided by manufacturers, leaks, or "insiders".
The first processor under our microscope is the Core i5-10300H as found on the latest MSI GF75 10SCXR laptop. This particular CPU sits on the very bottom of the list in Intel's current Comet Lake-H family to replace the 2019 9th gen Core i5-9300H and 2018 8th gen Core i5-8300H.
On paper, the Core i5-10300H has all the markings of a minor gen-to-gen refresh. It's got the same number of cores, same cache sizes, same 14 nm lithography, and same integrated UHD Graphics 630 GPU as its immediate Core i5-9300H predecessor. Its maximum Turbo Boost clock rate is higher this time around (4.5 GHz vs. 4.1 GHz) with a slightly higher base clock rate (2.5 GHz vs. 2.4 GHz). Otherwise, we expect performance to be very similar to the Core i5-9300H.
Our benchmarks below show this to be the case. When compared to the average Core i5-9300H in our database recorded from a dozen different laptops, our Core i5-10300H test unit is only about 4 to 5 percent and 7 to 10 percent faster in single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads, respectively. If you own a Core i5-9300H or Core i5-8300H laptop, then upgrading to the Core i5-10300H won't get you very far.
By extension, raw multi-thread performance would also only be just slightly faster than the average AMD Zen+ Ryzen 7 3750H. A small handful of Ryzen 7 3750H, Core i5-8300H, or Core i5-9300H laptops are thus able to marginally outperform the Core i5-10300H in this scenario.
Are you a techie who knows how to write? Then join our Team! Wanted:
- News Writer (Romania based)
Details here
Cinebench R11.5 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR | |
Average Intel Core i5-8300H (1.72 - 1.96, n=7) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3550H () | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 3750H () | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 3750H () | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3550H () | |
Average Intel Core i5-8300H (6.2 - 8.79, n=7) |
wPrime 2.10 - 1024m | |
Average Intel Core i5-8300H (206 - 286, n=4) | |
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3550H () | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 3750H () |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset | |
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR | |
Average Intel Core i5-9300H (5.7 - 6.5, n=3) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 3750H (4.14 - 4.4, n=3) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3550H (3.7 - 4.43, n=5) |
TrueCrypt | |
Serpent Mean 100MB | |
Average Intel Core i5-9300H () | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 3750H () | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3550H () | |
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR | |
Average Intel Core i5-8300H () | |
Twofish Mean 100MB | |
Average Intel Core i5-9300H () | |
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 3750H () | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3550H () | |
Average Intel Core i5-8300H () | |
AES Mean 100MB | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 3750H () | |
Average Intel Core i5-9300H () | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3550H () | |
Average Intel Core i5-8300H () | |
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR |
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3550H (612 - 759, n=6) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 3750H (584 - 672, n=3) | |
Average Intel Core i5-9300H (588 - 643, n=3) | |
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance Physics | |
Average Intel Core i5-9300H (7499 - 10557, n=12) | |
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR | |
Average Intel Core i5-8300H (6234 - 9415, n=15) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 3750H (6360 - 8648, n=11) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3550H (6321 - 7724, n=11) |
* ... smaller is better
Intel's strength against AMD continues to be in single-thread applications, 4K x265 video decoding, and data compression. The Core i5-10300H is able to complete HWBOT and 7-Zip 45 percent and 17 percent faster, respectively, than the Ryzen 7 3750H. Nonetheless, results are still essentially the same as the Core i5-9300H meaning that these advantages have not grown year over year.
Our comparison graphs below plot the CineBench R15 Multi-Thread scores of various laptops when running the benchmark in a loop. Most laptops start out strongly before scores begin to fall over time due to the limited Turbo Boost potential. The Core i5-10300H experiences a steeper performance drop than most Core i5-9300H or i5-8300H laptops while having a higher initial score during the start of the loop test. The observation aligns with the higher +400 MHz Turbo Boost clock rate of the Core i5-10300H over the i5-9300H.
AMD is about to phase out its 2nd gen Ryzen 7 3750H for the 3rd gen Ryzen 5 4600H which will be an entry-level hexa-core CPU designed to tackle the quad-core Core i5-10300H. There's no question that AMD's new 7 nm Ryzen 5 SKU will outperform the Core i5 in multi-threaded workloads. Based on these early performance numbers, OEMs will have to market their Core i5-10300H and i5-10400H laptops cheaper than their AMD Ryzen 5 counterparts if Intel wants to stand a chance in the budget gaming space.