Asus VivoBook 14 Flip TP3407SA, Ultra 5 226V
Specifications
Primary Camera: 2 MPix
Price comparison
Average of 1 scores (from 2 reviews)
Reviews for the Asus VivoBook 14 Flip TP3407SA, Ultra 5 226V
Source: Techlusive
Overall, for a price tag of Rs 93,990 the Asus Vivobook 14 Flip is a great 2-in-1 option for customers. The laptop feels premium, provides a great typing experience, and is powerful enough for all day-to-day tasks. The only caveat was the bottom-firing speakers, which could have very well been top-firing to improve the audio experience. So, if you’re someone looking for a laptop with 2-in-1 functionality and a vibrant colour accurate display, this could very well be a solid pick for you under Rs 1 lakh.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/13/2025
Foreign Reviews
Source: PC Guia
PT→ENSingle Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 07/27/2025
Rating: Total score: 84% price: 90%
Comment
Intel Arc 130V: An integrated graphics adapter that lower-end Intel Lunar Lake family processors employ. This is a direct successor to the Arc 7 iGPU; DirectX 12 Ultimate is fully supported here and the iGPU also supports hardware-decoding a long list of popular video codecs such as h.266 VVC, h.265 HEVC, h.264 AVC, AV1 and VP9. It is clear the 130V isn't fast enough to run most triple-A 2024 games at 1080p. However, it's still more than good enough for an occasional gaming session Helldivers 2 and Ready or Not run perfectly well at 1080p / Low.
Modern games should be playable with these graphics cards at low settings and resolutions. Casual gamers may be happy with these cards.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
Core Ultra 5 226V: One of the 2 slowest Lunar Lake processors as of Nov 2024. It features 4 new Skymont E-cores and 4 new Lion Cove P-cores running at up to 3.5 GHz and 4.5 GHz respectively, along with the new Arc 130V iGPU and 16 GB of on-package LPDDR5x-8533 RAM. The 226V's level 3 cache is pretty small as compared to more expensive Ultra 7 2xxV and Ultra 9 2xxV chips at 8 MB vs 12 MB. Its multi-thread performance is very close to the R7 7730U and the R7 7735U, and it eats up to 37 W in short-term loads.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
