AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX vs. Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX Analysis: The battle for the fastest gaming CPU
Both AMD and Nvidia have introduced their new high-end HX-class mobile processors together with Nvidia's new RTX 5000 laptop GPUs. In this analysis article, we compare the AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX with the Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX.
In addition to raw CPU performance, we also look at various system benchmarks along with gaming benchmarks in conjunction with the new 175 W Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop GPU.
Overview: AMD Fire Range vs. Intel Arrow Lake
The new Intel and AMD SKUs were officially announced at CES 2025, and both manufacturers claim to offer the best mobile processors for creative applications and games.
The AMD Fire Range APUs are based on the familiar Zen 5 cores and a variant with 3D-V cache is also available as an option. Intel, on the other hand, relies on the Arrow Lake architecture.
Our two test processors are the AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX and the Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, which are not exactly the fastest in their respective lineups.
Nevertheless, these two CPUs are likely to be used most frequently in high-performance gaming/creator laptops. In theory, the TDP of the CPUs is 54 W for AMD or 55 W for Intel, but under full load both can briefly consume more than 150 W.
The Ryzen 9 9955HX uses 16 cores including hyperthreading (32 threads), whereas the Core Ultra 9 275HX uses a total of 24 cores (8x Performance, 16x Efficiency) without hyperthreading.
Of particular interest is the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D, which unfortunately was not yet available for testing. Thanks to the 3D V-Cache, it promises above all an increased gaming performance, which we have already seen very clearly with its predecessor, the Ryzen 9 7945HX3D. We can only hope that availability will be better this time.
Test systems: Asus Strix Scar 18 & XMG Neo 16 A25
We had two extremely powerful gaming notebooks at our disposal as test systems. One was the new Asus ROG Strix SCAR 18 G835LX with the Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX and 64 GB RAM, and the other was an engineering sample of the new XMG Neo 16 A25 with the AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX in combination with 32 GB RAM.
Both devices were equipped with the new Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop GPU, which can consume up to 175 W. We used Nvidia Game Ready Driver 572.84 for both devices, making it ideal for performance comparisons.
At this point, however, we will refrain from extended consumption measurements and efficiency considerations, as the Nvidia GPU was always running on the external monitor in the engineering sample of the XMG Neo 16, which would naturally increase the power consumption and distort the efficiency results. We will provide these results as soon as possible.
Single-core performance
We used Cinebench 2024 and Geekbench 6 for the CPU benchmarks, as these two tests run natively on all platforms and therefore enable a very good performance comparison.
In the single-core tests, the Core Ultra 9 275HX was able to increase its performance by around 6% compared to the Core i9-14900HX. The Ryzen 9 9955HX, on the other hand, was able to increase its performance by around 11% compared to the Ryzen 9 7945HX and has thus caught up with the old Core i9-14900HX.
The two mobile offshoots also lag slightly behind their respective desktop counterparts and, as expected, Apple still has a massive advantage with the M4 generation.
In the Geekbench test, however, the tide turns and the Ryzen 9 9955HX is slightly ahead of the Core Ultra 9 275HX.
Multi-core performance
In the Cinebench 2024 multi-test, the new Core Ultra 9 275HX performs very well and can outperform the old Core i9-14900HX by a whopping 30%. The Ultra 9 275HX also narrowly beats the Apple M4 Max CPUs — which, however, require significantly less power.
The Ryzen 9 9955HX is around 15 % ahead of its predecessors and around 7 % behind the 275HX. The Geekbench multi-test shows a similar picture, with the two M4 Max SoCs coming out on top in this test.
System benchmarks
In the system benchmarks such as PCMark 10, CrossMark, or the 3DMark Physics tests, the AMD CPU almost always has the advantage over the Core Ultra 9 275HX.
However, the other components too naturally have an influence on overall system performance.
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
3DMark: 2560x1440 Time Spy CPU | 1920x1080 Fire Strike Physics
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
3DMark: 2560x1440 Time Spy CPU | 1920x1080 Fire Strike Physics
Gaming performance
Now we come to the gaming performance. We grabbed a number of current titles and tested them, although we did not use upscaling technologies in each case, as we wanted to see the influence of the CPU.
We have deliberately kept the comparison group small here and only compared the two current test subjects and the ROG Strix Scar 17, which was among the fastest gaming laptops of the last generation thanks to the HX3D processor.
In all tests, the AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX is ahead of the Core Ultra 9 275HX and the average advantage is 5%. The old Strix Scar with the Ryzen 9 7945HX3D and the RTX 4090 Laptop GPU can hold its own surprisingly well and is even ahead in some titles.
1080p Performance Rating - Percent | |
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX | |
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D | |
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX | |
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX |
F1 24 - 1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX | |
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D |
Assassin's Creed Shadows - 1920x1080 Ultra High | |
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX | |
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D |
Call of Duty Black Ops 6 - 1920x1080 Extreme Preset | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D | |
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX | |
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX |
Monster Hunter Wilds - 1920x1080 ultra, RT: high, no upscaling | |
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX | |
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D |
Indiana Jones and the Great Circle - 1920x1080 Very Ultra Preset | |
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D | |
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX |
Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX | |
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D |
Alan Wake 2 - 1920x1080 High Preset | |
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX | |
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D |
In QHD resolution, the Ryzen 9 9955HX remains ahead of the Core Ultra 9 275HX in every game, with the difference again being around 5%. The old Strix Scar 17 continues to hold its own but has to concede a little more ground to the new 2025 Scar 18.
QHD Performance Rating - Percent | |
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX | |
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 2560x1440 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX | |
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D |
F1 24 - 2560x1440 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX | |
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D |
Assassin's Creed Shadows - 2560x1440 Ultra High | |
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX | |
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D |
Call of Duty Black Ops 6 - 2560x1440 Extreme Preset | |
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D | |
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX |
Monster Hunter Wilds - 2560x1440 ultra, RT: high, no upscaling | |
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX | |
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D |
Indiana Jones and the Great Circle - 2560x1440 Very Ultra Preset | |
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX | |
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D |
Baldur's Gate 3 - 2560x1440 Ultra Preset | |
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX | |
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D |
Alan Wake 2 - 2560x1440 High Preset | |
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX | |
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D |
At 4K resolution, the influence of the processor decreases further and the difference between the AMD and Intel chips becomes smaller, although AMD manages slight leads in every game.
The Strix Scar 17 now falls behind more clearly here, but this is due to the older RTX 4090 Laptop GPU.
4K Performance Rating - Percent | |
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX | |
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D |
F1 24 - 3840x2160 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX | |
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D |
Assassin's Creed Shadows - 3840x2160 Ultra High | |
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX | |
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D |
Call of Duty Black Ops 6 - 3840x2160 Extreme Preset | |
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX | |
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D |
Monster Hunter Wilds - 3840x2160 ultra, RT: high, no upscaling | |
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX | |
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D |
Indiana Jones and the Great Circle - 3840x2160 Very Ultra Preset | |
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX | |
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D |
Baldur's Gate 3 - 3840x2160 Ultra Preset | |
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX | |
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D |
Alan Wake 2 - 3840x2160 High Preset | |
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX | |
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 3840x2160 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX | |
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D |
Performance with different power limits
We also tested the performance of the two new processors at fixed power limits. Here you can see that the Core Ultra 9 275HX delivers a good performance even at lower TDP values and can outperform the Ryzen 9 9955HX, but only in Cinebench 2024.
In the older Cinebench R23, AMD is ahead up to 100 W but then falls behind quite significantly.
TDP | AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX | Core Ultra 9 275HX | Core i9-14900HX |
---|---|---|---|
150 watts | 2,061 points | 2,158 points | 1,834 points |
130 watts | 2,030 points | 2,095 points | 1,757 points |
115 Watt | 2,008 points | 2,015 points | 1,525 points |
100 Watt | 1,948 points | 1,963 points | 1,424 points |
80 Watt | 1,809 points | 1,875 points | 1,373 points |
55 Watt | 1,489 points | 1,633 points | 1,105 points |
TDP | AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX | Core Ultra 9 275HX | Ryzen 9 7945HX3D | Ryzen 9 7945HX | Core i9-14900HX |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
150 Watt | 39,537 points | 38.108 points | 30,308 points | ||
130 watts | 38,502 points | 36,165 points | 34,202 points | 28,933 | |
115 watts | 37,157 points | 34,760 points | 33,361 points | 27,750 | |
100 watts | 35,500 points | 33,670 points | 32,977 points | 32,947 points | 26,232 points |
80 watts | 31,641 points | 31,880 points | 30,804 points | 30,907 points | 23,334 points |
55 Watt | 23,849 points | 27,283 points | 26,045 points | 18,258 points |
Verdict: AMD has the fastest gaming CPU for laptops pending the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D's arrival
The two new high-end mobile processors from AMD and Intel offer no surprises and are faster than their respective predecessors in both single-core and multi-core tests. Intel also has a slight advantage in the synthetic Cinebench tests, but it cannot replicate this in Geekbench or the system benchmarks.
In gaming, the winner is pretty evident because with the identical Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop GPU (detailed analysis here), the AMD processor comes out slightly faster in all the games we tested.
This increases the preference for the impending Ryzen 9 9955HX3D, which should once again deliver significantly better gaming performance. However, we don't expect to see test devices featuring the HX3D chip for a few weeks, and we can only hope that the availability of the HX3D processor will be better in this generation.