Notebookcheck Logo
Teaser

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 review - Enormous battery life and better performance of the M4 Pro

Even more versatile thanks to a matte display.

The large MacBook Pro 16 can better make use of the new Apple M4 Pro SoC's performance potential compared to the smaller MacBook Pro 14—plus, its battery life is even better. Again, its optional matte panel proves to be a real advantage if you often find yourself working in bright environments.
Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (translated by Daisy Dickson) Published 🇩🇪 🇫🇷 ...
ARM Apple Laptop Thunderbolt

Verdict - The MacBook Pro 16 is transformed into an even better multimedia laptop with the M4 Pro and a matte display

The 2024 model of the Apple MacBook Pro 16 is once again an impressive multimedia laptop. Its larger 16-inch case can better take advantage of the new M4 Pro SoC compared to the smaller MacBook Pro 14 and at the same time, its emissions remain lower. Apple has been able to raise its CPU and GPU performance considerably and especially in the single-core area, Apple's M4 generation currently faces no competition.

Although nothing has changed about the case itself, there has been a whole range of improvements introduced overall. Included in this is the mini-LED panel's improved SDR brightness alongside its new nano-texture coating—i.e. a matte display option. This means you can use the MacBook in super bright environments without any annoying reflections getting in your way. Its USB-C ports now support Thunderbolt 5 and its new 12-MP camera delivers a better picture during video calls as well as advanced features such as a desktop view. However, you'll have to make do without Wi-Fi 7. As always, its battery life is great, leaving the direct Windows competition in the dust.

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

Disadvantages include its lack of maintenance options and enormous surcharges for more RAM/SSD storage. Compared to Windows laptops, its choice of games is still limited, although the M4 Pro's gaming performance is generally very good and all native macOS titles run smoothly.

Pros

+ high-quality and stable case
+ brilliant display with accurate colors/optionally with a matte panel
+ extremely high HDR brightness/increased SDR brightness
+ always extremely quiet during everyday use
+ very high system performance
+ M4 Pro with considerably better performance
+ very long runtimes
+ excellent speakers
+ up to 128 GB RAM (M4 Max) and 8 TB SSD storage
+ 12-MP webcam with advanced functions

Cons

- constant PWM flickering & slow response times
- only 12-month warranty
- practically no maintenance options
- extremely high surcharges for RAM & SSD storage
- webcam without FaceID, low resolution when taking photos/videos
- no Wi-Fi 7

Price and availability

You can configure the new MacBook Pro 16 with the M4 Pro directly on Apple's website. The configuration with the M4 Pro, 48 GB RAM and a 512-GB SSD can be purchased from Amazon, where it currently costs $2,664.

Possible alternatives compared

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Height
Display
1.
93%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro
Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) ⎘
Apple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU ⎘
48 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD
Amazon:
List Price: 4219€
2.1 kg16.8 mm16.20"
3456x2234
254 PPI
Mini-LED
2.
93.7% v7 (old)
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro
Apple M3 Pro 12-Core ⎘
Apple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU ⎘
18 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD
Amazon:
1. $3,199.00
Apple 2023 MacBook Pro Lapto...
2. $2,234.51
Apple 2024 MacBook Pro Lapto...
3. $3,099.00
Apple MacBook Pro 16.2" with...
List Price: 2999€
2.1 kg16.9 mm16.20"
3456x2234
254 PPI
Mini-LED
3.
83.5%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGE
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGE
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H ⎘
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU ⎘
32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD
Amazon: $2,199.00
List Price: 3239 Euro
2 kg20.5 mm16.00"
2560x1600
189 PPI
IPS LED
4.
87.8%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 ⎘
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU ⎘
64 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD
Amazon:
1. $1,749.99
ASUS ProArt PX13 (Replace P1...
2. $65.88
GERVGHS 200W Laptop Charger ...
3. $109.99
ROG 200W Charger for Asus Pr...
List Price: 4000€
1.8 kg17.3 mm16.00"
3840x2400
283 PPI
OLED
5.
91.7% v7 (old)
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H ⎘
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU ⎘
32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD
Amazon:
1. $2,299.00
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16"" Lapt...
2. $1,279.99
Lenovo Yoga 9i AI Powered 2-...
3. $999.00
Lenovo LOQ 15 15ARP9 RTX 405...
List Price: 1900 USD
2.1 kg18.3 mm16.00"
3200x2000
236 PPI
IPS
6.
88.6% v7 (old)
Dell XPS 16 9640
Dell XPS 16 9640
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H ⎘
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU ⎘
32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD
Amazon:
1. $3,088.00
Dell XPS 16 9640 16.3" Touch...
2. $3,099.00
New XPS 16 9640 Powerful AI ...
3. $3,899.00
Dell XPS 9640 Laptop (2024) ...
2.3 kg18.7 mm16.30"
3840x2400
139 PPI
OLED
7.
90.4% v7 (old)
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H ⎘
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU ⎘
16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD
Amazon:
1. $2,956.23
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra -...
2. $1,194.99
SAMSUNG 16" Galaxy Book4 Pro...
3. $1,799.10
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra -...
List Price: 2799€
1.8 kg17 mm16.00"
2880x1800
212 PPI
OLED

Apple has presented its new MacBook Pro 16 and the base variant is already equipped with the full configuration of the M4 Pro SoC. In combination with 24 GB RAM and a 512-GB SSD, the new MBP 16 costs $2,499. Our test configuration comes with the new optional matte nano-texture panel ($150 surcharge) as well as 48 GB RAM and a 2-TB SSD. Due to Apple's enormous surcharges for RAM/SSD, its price rises to $3,649.

Specifications

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro (MacBook Pro 16 2024 Series)
Processor
Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) 14 x 2.6 - 4.5 GHz, 46 W PL2 / Short Burst, 46 W PL1 / Sustained
Graphics adapter
Memory
48 GB 
, LPDDR5x-8533, onboard
Display
16.20 inch 16:10, 3456 x 2234 pixel 254 PPI, Mini-LED, glossy: no, 120 Hz
Storage
Apple SSD AP2048Z, 2048 GB 
, 2007 GB free
Connections
3 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 3 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 3 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm Stereo, Card Reader: SDXC, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor
Networking
Broadcom 0x14E4, 0x4388 WiFi 6E AirPort (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 16.8 x 355.7 x 248.1 ( = 0.66 x 14 x 9.77 in)
Battery
99.6 Wh, 8607 mAh Lithium-Ion
Operating System
Apple macOS 15 Sequoia
Camera
Webcam: 12 MP Center Stage
Primary Camera: 12 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: 6-speaker system, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 140W PSU, 12 Months Warranty
Weight
2.128 kg ( = 75.06 oz / 4.69 pounds), Power Supply: 344 g ( = 12.13 oz / 0.76 pounds)
Price
4219 Euro
Amazon
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Case & connectivity

Compared to its predecessor, the new MacBook Pro's case is the exact same. It faces no quality issues and is an amazing laptop when it comes to stability and build. However, apart from being able to clean the fans, it again doesn't provide any maintenance options. The black color variant is once again slightly more sensitive to collecting fingerprint marks than the silver model. 

All three of its USB-C ports now support Thunderbolt 5 and its webcam now uses a 12-MP sensor. Its quality during video calls is good and the webcam now supports a desktop view—however, photos taken using the webcam continue to have a low resolution (photos 1,440 x 900, videos max. 1080p) and FaceID isn't supported. Its WLAN module supports Wi-Fi 6E as well as Bluetooth 5.3, but not Wi-Fi 7. We noted no transfer rate issues. The installed SD card reader is fast, but inserted cards stick out of the case by 1.6 cm. 

Its input devices are the same as on the old model. Its keyboard is generally comfortable to type on, but it could benefit from a higher key travel. The haptic trackpad, as always, works great.

Size comparison

362.72 mm / 14.3 in 253.69 mm / 9.99 in 18.3 mm / 0.72 in 2.1 kg4.73 lbs358.18 mm / 14.1 in 240 mm / 9.45 in 18.7 mm / 0.736 in 2.3 kg5.1 lbs354.4 mm / 14 in 241.2 mm / 9.5 in 20.5 mm / 0.807 in 2 kg4.35 lbs355.7 mm / 14 in 248.1 mm / 9.77 in 16.9 mm / 0.665 in 2.1 kg4.71 lbs355.7 mm / 14 in 248.1 mm / 9.77 in 16.8 mm / 0.661 in 2.1 kg4.69 lbs354.9 mm / 14 in 246.9 mm / 9.72 in 17.3 mm / 0.681 in 1.8 kg3.99 lbs355 mm / 14 in 250 mm / 9.84 in 17 mm / 0.669 in 1.8 kg4.02 lbs297 mm / 11.7 in 210 mm / 8.27 in 1 mm / 0.03937 in 5.7 g0.01257 lbs
Left: MagSafe, 2x USB-C 4.0 with Thunderbolt 5 (120 Gbit/s, DisplayPort ALT mode, Power Delivery), 3.5-mm audio
Left: MagSafe, 2x USB-C 4.0 with Thunderbolt 5 (120 Gbit/s, DisplayPort ALT mode, Power Delivery), 3.5-mm audio
Right: SD card reader, USB-C 4.0 with Thunderbolt 5 (120 Gbit/s, DisplayPort ALT mode, Power Delivery), HDMI output
Right: SD card reader, USB-C 4.0 with Thunderbolt 5 (120 Gbit/s, DisplayPort ALT mode, Power Delivery), HDMI output
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro
Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
163.2 MB/s
Dell XPS 16 9640
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
148 MB/s -9%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
127 MB/s -22%
Average of class Multimedia
  (19.3 - 198, n=43, last 2 years)
102.3 MB/s -37%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
86.1 MB/s -47%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
78.8 MB/s -52%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGE
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (AV Pro V60)
49.6 MB/s -70%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
254.4 MB/s +6%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro
Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
239.1 MB/s
Dell XPS 16 9640
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
204.3 MB/s -15%
Average of class Multimedia
  (27.4 - 262, n=43, last 2 years)
144.8 MB/s -39%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
90.2 MB/s -62%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGE
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (AV Pro V60)
89.3 MB/s -63%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
87.2 MB/s -64%
Networking
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro
Broadcom 0x14E4, 0x4388 WiFi 6E AirPort
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1616 (min: 1558) MBit/s ∼90%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1591 (min: 1551) MBit/s ∼93%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGE
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1433 (min: 1179) MBit/s ∼80%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1701 (min: 1556) MBit/s ∼99%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1234 (min: 810) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1720 (min: 1657) MBit/s ∼100%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
Mediatek Wi-Fi 7 MT7925 Wireless LAN Card
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1788 (min: 1649) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1699 (min: 1607) MBit/s ∼99%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
737 (min: 581) MBit/s ∼41%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
805 (min: 713) MBit/s ∼47%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1078 (min: 1020) MBit/s ∼87%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1262 (min: 1155) MBit/s ∼73%
Dell XPS 16 9640
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1580 (min: 1483) MBit/s ∼88%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1591 (min: 1476) MBit/s ∼93%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1625 (min: 1476) MBit/s ∼91%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1715 (min: 1675) MBit/s ∼100%
05010015020025030035040045050055060065070075080085090095010001050110011501200125013001350140014501500155016001650Tooltip
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø1616 (1558-1664)
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1591 (1551-1635)
ColorChecker
21 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
15.7 ∆E
18.8 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
14.1 ∆E
9 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
17.1 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
14.3 ∆E
16.1 ∆E
1.9 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
19.3 ∆E
19.2 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro: 12.77 ∆E min: 1.91 - max: 21.02 ∆E

Display - Mini-LED now with a matte surface

Sub-pixel array
Sub-pixel array
Maximum HDR brightness (1,620 cd/m²)
Maximum HDR brightness (1,620 cd/m²)

Apple continues to rely on the familiar mini-LED panel with a diagonal of 16.2 inches and a resolution of 3,456 x 2,234 pixels. New, on the other hand, is its nano-texture option, which our test device is equipped with. Subjectively, its picture is only slightly negatively impacted by this, as light areas look a little grainy upon closer inspection—but from a normal distance, we noted no problems and would definitely prefer to go for the matte option. Its second improvement is its increased SDR brightness with the ambient light sensor activated, which can now reach over 1,000 cd/m² (1,063 cd/m²).

Apart from this, the MacBook's display remains the market reference in many areas (black value, HDR brightness of up to 1,620 cd/m² & 1,214 cd/m² when depicting an almost fully white screen, HDR capabilities) and at this stage, we would recommend taking a look at our review of the MacBook Pro 14 M4 Pro, where we spoke about these aspects in greater detail. The MBP 16 also uses constant PWM flickering at 14.8 kHz, which shouldn't be a problem for most users. The constant PWM flickering makes it extremely difficult to determine the screen's response times, but this applies to all mini LED panels (not just Apple). Even if our values seem very high (especially compared to OLED screens), they shouldn't be overestimated. In everyday use, you won't notice any lagging effects (also thanks to the ProMotion technology at 120 Hz) and there are no problems with lots of games (e.g. Baldur's Gate 3 or Resident Evil Village), but OLED panels are nevertheless the better choice for extremely fast shooters.

608
cd/m²
615
cd/m²
617
cd/m²
618
cd/m²
632
cd/m²
623
cd/m²
602
cd/m²
617
cd/m²
615
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 632 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 616.3 cd/m² Minimum: 1 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 632 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 0.6 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.83}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 0.8 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5.1}
88.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
99.7% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.21
CCT: 6450 K
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro
Mini-LED, 3456x2234, 16.2", 120 Hz
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGE
MNG007DA1-9 , IPS LED, 2560x1600, 16", 165 Hz
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
ATNA60YV02-0, OLED, 3840x2400, 16", 60 Hz
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
LEN160-3.2K, IPS, 3200x2000, 16", 165 Hz
Dell XPS 16 9640
SDC4196, OLED, 3840x2400, 16.3", 90 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
ATNA60CL07-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 16", 120 Hz
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max
Mini-LED, 3456x2234, 16", 120 Hz
Display
-17%
4%
-2%
-1%
-0%
-1%
Display P3 Coverage
99.7
69.4
-30%
99.9
0%
95.6
-4%
98.3
-1%
98.6
-1%
99.2
-1%
sRGB Coverage
100
97.6
-2%
100
0%
99.9
0%
100
0%
99.9
0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
88.8
71.8
-19%
99.1
12%
86.5
-3%
87.8
-1%
88.5
0%
Response Times
74%
84%
75%
98%
99%
-31%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
43 ?(9.6, 33.4)
11.2 ?(5.6, 5.6)
74%
1.58 ?(0.84, 0.74)
96%
12.4 ?(6.3, 6.1)
71%
0.82 ?(0.43, 0.39)
98%
0.54 ?(0.29, 0.25)
99%
66.9 ?(29.4, 37.5)
-56%
Response Time Black / White *
41.2 ?(24.5, 16.7)
10.6 ?(6.1, 4.5)
74%
1.25 ?(0.67, 0.58)
97%
8.9 ?(4.8, 4.1)
78%
0.85 ?(0.46, 0.39)
98%
0.69 ?(0.39, 0.3)
98%
43.6 ?(13.6, 30)
-6%
PWM Frequency
14880
240 ?(52, 93)
360 ?(90)
240 ?(100)
14877
PWM Amplitude *
90
36
60%
Screen
-293%
-58%
-118%
-96%
-82%
-62%
Brightness middle
632
516
-18%
355
-44%
404.9
-36%
366
-42%
390
-38%
630
0%
Brightness
616
505
-18%
360
-42%
390
-37%
367
-40%
393
-36%
604
-2%
Brightness Distribution
95
89
-6%
98
3%
91
-4%
96
1%
98
3%
94
-1%
Black Level *
0.41
0.4
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
0.6
3.5
-483%
1.2
-100%
2.42
-303%
1.3
-117%
1.4
-133%
1.2
-100%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
1.2
8.8
-633%
2.6
-117%
4.65
-288%
3.6
-200%
2.7
-125%
2.8
-133%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
0.8
5.6
-600%
1.2
-50%
1.1
-38%
2.2
-175%
2.1
-163%
1.9
-138%
Gamma
2.21 100%
2.27 97%
2.14 103%
2.22 99%
2.14 103%
2.27 97%
2.29 96%
CCT
6450 101%
6071 107%
6526 100%
6468 100%
6680 97%
6431 101%
6812 95%
Contrast
1259
1012
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.2
0.93
1
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-79% / -151%
10% / -7%
-15% / -51%
0% / -34%
6% / -27%
-31% / -49%

* ... smaller is better

CalMAN grayscale
CalMAN grayscale
CalMAN saturation
CalMAN saturation
CalMAN ColorChecker
CalMAN ColorChecker
vs. P3
vs. P3

The panel's calibration straight out of the box is excellent. We analyzed it using the professional CalMAN software and its deviations compared to the P3 reference color space were minimal for both grayscale and colors. The P3 and sRGB color spaces are covered completely, and AdobeRGB is covered by 88.8%.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
41.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 24.5 ms rise
↘ 16.7 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 98 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
43 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9.6 ms rise
↘ 33.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 69 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.1 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 14880 Hz
Amplitude: 90 %

The display backlight flickers at 14880 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 14880 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8327 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

PWM flickering (0 % brightness)
PWM flickering (0 % brightness)
PWM flickering (25 % brightness)
PWM flickering (25 % brightness)
PWM flickering (50 % brightness)
PWM flickering (50 % brightness)
PWM flickering (75 % brightness)
PWM flickering (75 % brightness)
PWM flickering (100 % brightness)
PWM flickering (100 % brightness)
In the sun
In the sun
Outside (cloudy day)
Outside (cloudy day)
Viewing-angle stability
Viewing-angle stability

Performance - The MBP 16 with the more powerful M4 Pro

Apple equips its MacBook Pro 16 with the full configuration of the M4 Pro (14 CPU cores, 20 GPU cores) as standard, as well as with 24/48 GB RAM. You can optionally go for the two M4 Max SoCs with 36, 64 or 128 GB RAM.

Testing conditions

The MBP 16 offers three energy profiles: Low Charge, Automatic & High Performance. The latter brings only a slight advantage in its combined CPU/GPU utilization, but the fans are also significantly louder (42.3 vs. 55.6 dB(A)). We performed our benchmarks and measurements using Automatic mode.

Processor - M4 Pro with 14 CPU cores

We already took a detailed look at the new M4 Pro SoC in our analysis article. In its full configuration, it features 10 performance and 4 efficiency cores. The same as in the smaller MacBook Pro, the M4 Pro can consume up to 46 watts, whereas the larger MBP 16 can keep this value constant under continuous load. Its benchmark results were impressive and in the multi-core tests, it performed a little better than inside the smaller MBP 14. Furthermore, its results were even a bit better than those of the old M3 Max, and the multimedia competition from AMD/Intel also couldn't keep up. Although the respective HX chips from AMD or Intel offer even more multi-core performance, they are usually only installed in gaming laptops and also require significantly more power. AMD's Ryzen 9 7945HX is faster at 55 watts and should offer comparable performance at 45 watts, but is not operated at these power limits inside any laptop. The current Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 in the ProArt P16 (80 watts), on the other hand, is slower.

In contrast, the M4 generation's single-core performance faces no competition whatsoever and there are currently no faster competing products on the market (by a long shot). In battery mode, its performance remains completely stable.

Cinebench 2024: CPU Multi Core | CPU Single Core | Geekbench 6.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Cinebench 2024 / CPU Multi Core
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro
Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)
1729 Points
Average Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)
  (1662 - 1729, n=2)
1696 Points -2%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro
Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)
1662 Points -4%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max
Apple M3 Max 16-Core
1612 Points -7%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
1201 Points -31%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro
Apple M3 Pro 12-Core
1059 Points -39%
Dell XPS 16 9640
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1001 Points -42%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGE
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
999 Points -42%
Average of class Multimedia
  (327 - 2069, n=61, last 2 years)
987 Points -43%
Cinebench 2024 / CPU Single Core
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro
Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)
178 Points
Average Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)
  (177 - 178, n=2)
177.5 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro
Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)
177 Points -1%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro
Apple M3 Pro 12-Core
143 Points -20%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max
Apple M3 Max 16-Core
139 Points -22%
Average of class Multimedia
  (72.5 - 178, n=42, last 2 years)
122.4 Points -31%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
116 Points -35%
Dell XPS 16 9640
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
104 Points -42%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGE
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
101.6 Points -43%
Geekbench 6.4 / Multi-Core
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro
Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)
22544 Points 0%
Average Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)
  (22509 - 22544, n=2)
22527 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro
Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)
22509 Points
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max
Apple M3 Max 16-Core
21243 Points -6%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro
Apple M3 Pro 12-Core
15480 Points -31%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
15367 Points -32%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
14122 Points -37%
Dell XPS 16 9640
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
13656 Points -39%
Average of class Multimedia
  (4983 - 25760, n=77, last 2 years)
13511 Points -40%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGE
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
12952 Points -42%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
12517 Points -44%
Geekbench 6.4 / Single-Core
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro
Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)
3927 Points +2%
Average Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)
  (3836 - 3927, n=2)
3882 Points +1%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro
Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)
3836 Points
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro
Apple M3 Pro 12-Core
3138 Points -18%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max
Apple M3 Max 16-Core
3096 Points -19%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
2877 Points -25%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1534 - 3927, n=73, last 2 years)
2702 Points -30%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
2506 Points -35%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2436 Points -36%
Dell XPS 16 9640
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2418 Points -37%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGE
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2389 Points -38%
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
23437 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
2290 Points
Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
178 Points
Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
1729 Points
Help

System performance

Amorphous Memory Mark
Amorphous Memory Mark

The new MacBook Pro 16 is an extremely fast device for everyday use as well as in the synthetic benchmarks and during our test, we noted no stability issues at all. The new M4 Pro did particularly well in the browser tests.

CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
CrossMark / Overall
Average Apple M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU
  (2148 - 2162, n=2)
2155 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro
M4 Pro 20-Core GPU, M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple SSD AP2048Z
2148 Points
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro
M3 Pro 18-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 12-Core, Apple SSD AP0512Z
1977 Points -8%
Dell XPS 16 9640
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
1848 Points -14%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
1811 Points -16%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1794 Points -16%
Average of class Multimedia
  (866 - 2255, n=65, last 2 years)
1746 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1740 Points -19%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02
1708 Points -20%
CrossMark / Productivity
Average Apple M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU
  (1980 - 2010, n=2)
1995 Points +1%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro
M4 Pro 20-Core GPU, M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple SSD AP2048Z
1980 Points
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro
M3 Pro 18-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 12-Core, Apple SSD AP0512Z
1782 Points -10%
Dell XPS 16 9640
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
1750 Points -12%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
1717 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1659 Points -16%
Average of class Multimedia
  (913 - 2050, n=65, last 2 years)
1651 Points -17%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02
1630 Points -18%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1611 Points -19%
CrossMark / Creativity
Average Apple M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU
  (2590 - 2594, n=2)
2592 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro
M4 Pro 20-Core GPU, M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple SSD AP2048Z
2590 Points
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro
M3 Pro 18-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 12-Core, Apple SSD AP0512Z
2424 Points -6%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2270 Points -12%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
2037 Points -21%
Dell XPS 16 9640
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
2014 Points -22%
Average of class Multimedia
  (907 - 2795, n=65, last 2 years)
1975 Points -24%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1930 Points -25%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02
1903 Points -27%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Dell XPS 16 9640
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
1683 Points +7%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro
M4 Pro 20-Core GPU, M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple SSD AP2048Z
1566 Points
Average Apple M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU
  (1556 - 1566, n=2)
1561 Points 0%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
1493 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1467 Points -6%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro
M3 Pro 18-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 12-Core, Apple SSD AP0512Z
1466 Points -6%
Average of class Multimedia
  (605 - 2094, n=65, last 2 years)
1439 Points -8%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02
1418 Points -9%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1225 Points -22%
WebXPRT 3 / Overall
Average Apple M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU
  (525 - 545, n=2)
535 Points +2%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro
M4 Pro 20-Core GPU, M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple SSD AP2048Z
525 Points
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro
M3 Pro 18-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 12-Core, Apple SSD AP0512Z
427 Points -19%
Average of class Multimedia
  (136.4 - 545, n=67, last 2 years)
326 Points -38%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
298 Points -43%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
293 Points -44%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02
285 Points -46%
Dell XPS 16 9640
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
283 Points -46%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
281 Points -46%
WebXPRT 4 / Overall
Average Apple M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU
  (337 - 353, n=2)
345 Points +2%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro
M4 Pro 20-Core GPU, M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple SSD AP2048Z
337 Points
Average of class Multimedia
  (167.3 - 353, n=60, last 2 years)
274 Points -19%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
268 Points -20%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
258 Points -23%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02
258 Points -23%
Dell XPS 16 9640
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
254 Points -25%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
244 Points -28%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02
528 ms * -108%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
512 ms * -101%
Average of class Multimedia
  (254 - 835, n=72, last 2 years)
482 ms * -90%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
439 ms * -73%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
416.4 ms * -64%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro
M3 Pro 18-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 12-Core, Apple SSD AP0512Z
376.2 ms * -48%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro
M4 Pro 20-Core GPU, M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple SSD AP2048Z
254.3 ms *
Average Apple M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU
  (254 - 255, n=2)
254 ms * -0%

* ... smaller is better

Storage device

Amorphous Disk Mark
Amorphous Disk Mark

The base model of the MacBook Pro 16 is equipped with 512 GB of SSD storage; our test device has the 2 TB AP2048Z variant installed (+$600), of which 1.96 TB is available after first starting up the laptop. Four NAND modules with 512 GB capacity each are installed, and the SSD's performance is very good. Further SSD benchmarks are listed here. The M4 Pro can be combined with a 4-TB SSD at best; 8 TB is only available in combination with the fast M4 Max.

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max
Apple SSD AP8192Z
100 pt
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro
Apple SSD AP2048Z
88.2 pt
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Max
Apple SSD AP2048Z
87.2 pt
Average Apple SSD AP2048Z
 
87.1 pt
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro
Apple SSD AP2048Z
85.6 pt
Average of class Multimedia
 
75.3 pt
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro
Apple SSD AP0512Z
66.3 pt
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3
Apple SSD AP0512Z
45.5 pt
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3
Apple SSD AP1024Z
43.5 pt
Blackmagic Disk Speed Test
5GB Read
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max
Apple SSD AP8192Z
5665.9 MB/s +5%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro
Apple SSD AP2048Z
5401.3 MB/s
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro
Apple SSD AP2048Z
5378.2 MB/s 0%
Average Apple SSD AP2048Z
  (5294 - 5401, n=6)
5366 MB/s -1%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Max
Apple SSD AP2048Z
5294.2 MB/s -2%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2877 - 5666, n=10, last 2 years)
4728 MB/s -12%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro
Apple SSD AP0512Z
4645.3 MB/s -14%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3
Apple SSD AP0512Z
2947.8 MB/s -45%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3
Apple SSD AP1024Z
2876.6 MB/s -47%
5GB Write
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max
Apple SSD AP8192Z
8271 MB/s +23%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro
Apple SSD AP2048Z
6713.2 MB/s
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Max
Apple SSD AP2048Z
6699 MB/s 0%
Average Apple SSD AP2048Z
  (6314 - 6713, n=6)
6572 MB/s -2%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro
Apple SSD AP2048Z
6313.9 MB/s -6%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2993 - 8271, n=10, last 2 years)
5548 MB/s -17%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro
Apple SSD AP0512Z
4192.9 MB/s -38%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3
Apple SSD AP0512Z
3217.8 MB/s -52%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3
Apple SSD AP1024Z
2992.9 MB/s -55%

Graphics card

The new M4 Pro GPU features 20 cores and can consume a maximum of 32 watts—but it can keep this value stable. Apple has been able to increase its performance by over 30% compared to the fast M3 Pro GPU. However, in contrast to the CPU, the M4 Pro's GPU keeps a respectable distance from the old M3 Max GPU. In the benchmarks, the M4 Pro GPU was even able to outperform the GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop inside the Dell XPS 16 (60-watt TGP) at times, but it lagged behind the ProArt P16's 4070 Laptop (105-watt TGP). Its biggest advantage (especially when editing video or coding) is its unified memory. However, AMD's Strix Halo GPU is likely to become a strong competitor in the future.

When it comes to gaming, on the other hand, the tables are turned, with the dedicated GeForce GPUs showing an advantage—even with native macOS games such as Baldur's Gate 3. Nevertheless, the M4 Pro GPU still performed well and could, for example, easily display 1080p with maximum details. All other games we tested were emulated on the MacBook Pro, which of course comes at the cost of some performance. Nevertheless, its performance remained completely stable and even Cyberpunk 2077 ran smoothly. We can't wait to see how the native version of Cyberpunk will perform next year. We haven't yet been able to test GTA V on the new MacBooks, as the new BattleEye anti-cheat software is causing us some problems. 

3DMark
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
22868 Points +18%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro
Apple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU, Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)
19345 Points
Average Apple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU
  (19284 - 19345, n=2)
19315 Points 0%
Dell XPS 16 9640
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
17684 Points -9%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro
Apple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 12-Core
14545 Points -25%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3164 - 37434, n=28, last 2 years)
14210 Points -27%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
11948 Points -38%
Steel Nomad Light Score
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
12189 Points +57%
Average Apple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU
  (7781 - 7809, n=2)
7795 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro
Apple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU, Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)
7781 Points
Average of class Multimedia
  (1147 - 13989, n=32, last 2 years)
5604 Points -28%
Cinebench 2024 - GPU
Dell XPS 16 9640
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
10457 Points +18%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
9916 Points +12%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
9551 Points +8%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3289 - 16546, n=18, last 2 years)
9170 Points +4%
Average Apple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU
  (8851 - 9085, n=2)
8968 Points +1%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro
Apple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU, Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)
8851 Points
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro
Apple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 12-Core
5980 Points -32%
Geekbench 6.4
GPU Metal
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro
Apple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU, Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)
114278 Points
Average Apple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU
  (113258 - 114278, n=2)
113768 Points 0%
Average of class Multimedia
  (47494 - 179746, n=10, last 2 years)
106862 Points -6%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro
Apple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 12-Core
78324 Points -31%
GPU OpenCL
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
111325 Points +60%
Dell XPS 16 9640
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
105731 Points +52%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
93132 Points +33%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
77635 Points +11%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro
Apple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU, Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)
69778 Points
Average Apple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU
  (69553 - 69778, n=2)
69666 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
60815 Points -13%
Average of class Multimedia
  (9994 - 125058, n=70, last 2 years)
52258 Points -25%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro
Apple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 12-Core
50373 Points -28%
GFXBench
3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro
Apple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU, Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)
125.8 fps
Average Apple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU
  (125.7 - 125.8, n=2)
125.8 fps 0%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
123.9 fps -2%
Average of class Multimedia
  (36.4 - 232, n=17, last 2 years)
105.9 fps -16%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro
Apple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 12-Core
97.8 fps -22%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
96.5622 fps -23%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average Apple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU
  (284 - 284, n=2)
284 fps 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro
Apple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU, Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)
283.7 fps
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
282.3 fps 0%
Average of class Multimedia
  (73.3 - 516, n=17, last 2 years)
230 fps -19%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
224.363 fps -21%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro
Apple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 12-Core
219.7 fps -23%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen
Average Apple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU
  (573 - 575, n=2)
574 fps 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro
Apple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU, Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)
573.2 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
525.655 fps -8%
Average of class Multimedia
  (174.6 - 941, n=14, last 2 years)
484 fps -16%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro
Apple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 12-Core
436 fps -24%
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score
7781 points
Help
Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Dell XPS 16 9640
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
91.8 fps +48%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
82.5 fps +33%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
81.3 fps +31%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGE
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
67.4 (49min, 50.5P0.1, 58.5P1) fps +9%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro
Apple M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU
62 fps
Average of class Multimedia
  (7.8 - 127.3, n=54, last 2 years)
46 fps -26%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro
Apple M3 Pro 12-Core, Apple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU
43 fps -31%
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
80.7 (65.3min) fps +104%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGE
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
65.1 (53.5min) fps +64%
Dell XPS 16 9640
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
64.3 (53.3min) fps +62%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
58.3 (14.6min) fps +47%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro
Apple M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU
39.6 fps
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
39.4 (32.4min) fps -1%
Average of class Multimedia
  (6.41 - 97.8, n=65, last 2 years)
35.8 fps -10%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro
Apple M3 Pro 12-Core, Apple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU
30.8 fps -22%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro
Apple M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU
87 fps
Average of class Multimedia
  (23 - 129, n=12, last 2 years)
78.1 fps -10%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro
Apple M3 Pro 12-Core, Apple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU
57 fps -34%
Total War Pharaoh - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro
Apple M3 Pro 12-Core, Apple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU
58 fps +13%
Average of class Multimedia
  (23.4 - 121, n=17, last 2 years)
55.5 fps +8%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro
Apple M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU
51.2 fps
lowmed.highultraQHD
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 204 111 100 87 57
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) 92 78 64 62 43
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) 50.5 48.7 44.5 39.6 24.8
Total War Pharaoh (2023) 65.8 55.4 51.7 51.2 49.3

Emissions & power

Noise emissions

The larger MacBook Pro 16 with the M4 Pro is generally quieter than the smaller MacBook Pro 14, as its fans operate at a lower speed. During our test, the MBP 16 generally remained silent for a very long time and the first fan speed of ~1,400 rpm which we measured was practically inaudible at ~25 dB(A). When gaming, it reached a maximum of 33.9 dB(A) (~2,700 rpm), and a maximum of 42.3 dB(A) (~3,600 rpm) during the stress test. In High Performance mode, it got significantly louder, reaching 55.6 dB(A) at ~5,560 rpm; in Low Charge mode, the MacBook remained extremely quiet at all times (25.3 dB(A) at ~1,400 rpm). There were no other electronic noises coming from our test device.

Noise Level

Idle
24 / 24 / 24 dB(A)
Load
25.3 / 42.3 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 24 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2049.940.441.941.941.338.441.943.82535.937.43327.732.833.930.535.43131.134.3313033.132.129.637.64032.435.231.432.230.836.929.240.55027.133.829.4272829.326326328.131.426.925.327.326.824.733.68024.227.322.823.823.823.620.53010024.424.723.123.521.721.520.928.512525.326.223.220.721.520.820.426.116022.325.921.518.919.11918.123.420024.723.721.519.820.320.818.224.825026.42623.620.920.821.519.525.331527.424.322.120.42118.616.222.640026.222.6201918.315.914.521.950026.822.119.118.11713.711.421.163026.921.819.218.316.812.910.920.780030.824.221.319.918.713.110.620.2100030.323.219.918.918.212.810.720.2125030.723.119.617.616.81210.719.416003325.220.618.31711.810.319.8200035.524.119.617.716.71210.618.3250033.522.317.815.81512.111.118.1315027.918.515.514.313.712.311.317.8400028.517.115.114.413.912.311.717.2500025.816.615.615.315.212.612.217.1630020.71716.416161312.216.8800018.116.516.115.615.312.912.216.51000016.216.316.616.41612.912.216.41250016.517.118.318.218.11312.416.31600016.317.818.717.91812.211.815.7SPL42.333.930.729.328.725.32431.1N3.61.91.41.21.10.70.61.6median 26.4median 22.6median 19.6median 18.2median 17median 12.9median 12.2median 19.8Delta4.33.72.51.91.72.82.32.9hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseApple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro
M4 Pro 20-Core GPU, M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple SSD AP2048Z
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro
M3 Pro 18-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 12-Core, Apple SSD AP0512Z
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
Dell XPS 16 9640
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
Noise
-6%
-24%
-29%
-18%
-16%
-9%
off / environment *
24
24.4
-2%
24.7
-3%
24.4
-2%
23.6
2%
24.5
-2%
24.2
-1%
Idle Minimum *
24
24.4
-2%
24.7
-3%
24.4
-2%
23.6
2%
24.5
-2%
24.2
-1%
Idle Average *
24
24.4
-2%
24.7
-3%
27.7
-15%
25.4
-6%
24.5
-2%
24.2
-1%
Idle Maximum *
24
24.4
-2%
24.7
-3%
32.3
-35%
25.4
-6%
27.5
-15%
24.2
-1%
Load Average *
25.3
26.9
-6%
43.7
-73%
42.2
-67%
44.2
-75%
39.6
-57%
37.9
-50%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *
33.9
53.2
-57%
53.2
-57%
Load Maximum *
42.3
50.4
-19%
53.3
-26%
53.2
-26%
52.6
-24%
49.7
-17%
41.7
1%
Witcher 3 ultra *
25.1
48.9
49.7
41.7

* ... smaller is better

Temperature

In addition to its low fan noise, the surface temperatures also remain lower on the larger MBP 16. Its metal case stays super cool during less demanding tasks and even during the stress test, we only measured a maximum of 43 °C in some places. 

In the stress test with combined CPU/GPU load, the M4 Pro inside the large MBP 16 again performed better than in the smaller 14-inch model. The M4 Pro SoC consumed a maximum of 74 watts and then stabilized at around 60 watts. The High Performance mode provided an advantage in this case, as the SoC's consumption then stayed at around 66 watts under continuous load.

0510152025303540Tooltip
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro M4 Pro 20-Core GPU, M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple SSD AP2048Z; Cinebench R23 Multi + 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Stress Test CPU Power: Ø33.7 (28.006-40.843)
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro M4 Pro 20-Core GPU, M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple SSD AP2048Z; Cinebench R23 Multi + 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Stress Test CPU Power: Ø22.1 (19.969-40.363)
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro M4 Pro 20-Core GPU, M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple SSD AP2048Z; Cinebench R23 Multi + 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Stress Test GPU Power: Ø29.2 (26.855-34.102)
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro M4 Pro 20-Core GPU, M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple SSD AP2048Z; Cinebench R23 Multi + 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Stress Test GPU Power: Ø19.8 (18.582-27.706)
Max. Load
 42.7 °C
109 F
41.8 °C
107 F
41.3 °C
106 F
 
 38 °C
100 F
42.7 °C
109 F
38 °C
100 F
 
 31.4 °C
89 F
30 °C
86 F
30.5 °C
87 F
 
Maximum: 42.7 °C = 109 F
Average: 37.4 °C = 99 F
42.7 °C
109 F
42.9 °C
109 F
43.1 °C
110 F
39.5 °C
103 F
42.5 °C
109 F
39.7 °C
103 F
31.8 °C
89 F
34.2 °C
94 F
32 °C
90 F
Maximum: 43.1 °C = 110 F
Average: 38.7 °C = 102 F
Power Supply (max.)  46.4 °C = 116 F | Room Temperature 21 °C = 70 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.4 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.7 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.1 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 21.3 °C / 70 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 37.4 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the class Multimedia.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.7 °C / 90.9 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.7 °C / 83.7 F (-4 °C / -7.2 F).
Surface temperatures stress test (top)
Surface temperatures stress test (top)
Surface temperatures stress test (bottom)
Surface temperatures stress test (bottom)
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro
Apple M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro
Apple M3 Pro 12-Core, Apple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGE
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
Dell XPS 16 9640
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
Heat
-1%
-16%
-26%
-19%
-9%
-2%
Maximum Upper Side *
42.7
38.1
11%
50.3
-18%
46.9
-10%
41
4%
39.4
8%
38.5
10%
Maximum Bottom *
43.1
37
14%
38
12%
50.9
-18%
40.6
6%
36.9
14%
41.2
4%
Idle Upper Side *
21.5
24.2
-13%
28.3
-32%
28.9
-34%
30.2
-40%
28.2
-31%
23.5
-9%
Idle Bottom *
21.5
24.6
-14%
27.3
-27%
30
-40%
31.4
-46%
27.4
-27%
24.1
-12%

* ... smaller is better

Speakers

The MacBook Pro 16's sound system is once again excellent and is one of the best on the market—but the competition doesn't have to hide in this respect, delivering similar results at times.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2041.945.72530.536.43129.635.14029.235.9502636.76324.746.78020.555.110020.960.112520.465.216018.166.120018.272.625019.574.731516.27540014.573.250011.471.363010.971.480010.674.9100010.773.7125010.773.7160010.372.3200010.670.9250011.174.7315011.374.1400011.771.6500012.268.9630012.270.9800012.270.41000012.269.91250012.470.61600011.869.4SPL2484.6N0.669.3median 12.2median 71.4Delta2.32.127.43829.728.527.92928.83523.729.819.327.11938.216.349.419.557.914.360.511.365.211.667.210.472.112.770.313.368.310.771.810.276.410.173.310.669.512.267.811.767.911.966.612.467.713.463.112.762.212.669.1136412.660.913.565.21559.624.381.40.554.9median 12.6median 67.21.43.835.641.331.233.642.933.838.540.426.435.225.539.728.148.120.960.820.265.217.961.719.46820.368.616.568.91471.111.771.711.174.410.974.410.571.910.77110.7691168.711.466.511.768.112.167.312.26412.563.612.365.212.460.812.259.411.65124.481.40.655.7median 12.2median 682.9436.541.236.527.529.127.525.52725.525.423.125.441.521.741.553.32453.363.522.663.567.922.667.968.521.168.57517.27573.318.973.373.317.373.373.717.673.775.617.875.678.616.878.677.515.777.577.213.177.273.712.773.771.511.871.574.511.774.574.911.874.971.212.971.272.413.172.473.11273.169.612.369.66812.16869.112.369.16812.16863.411.663.462.410.962.485.525.485.5740.774median 73.3median 12.9median 73.32.92.32.939.64532.536.629.23333.534.832.537.82839.22339.423.347.322.253.123.554.421.760.821.864.517.47014.176.712.175.913.474.910.77410.274.310.172.510.47210.670.310.868.711.270.211.869.311.969.712.16712.166.712.266.312.367.911.462.524.583.40.662.1median 12.1median 69.33.34.540.241.229.532.52831.33134.628.231.125.629.319.329.519.439.918.94917.751.517.559.919.962.7156812.769.511.368.311.17110.975.610.57310.873.910.873.810.97611.473.611.869.112.369.612.565.512.670.312.674.512.876.313.276.613.267.424.2850.665.4median 12.6median 69.625.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseApple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 ProLenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGEAsus ProArt P16 H7606WILenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050Dell XPS 16 9640Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5.1% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGE audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 18%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (5.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Dell XPS 16 9640 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 7% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Power consumption

We noted no major differences between the new MacBook Pro 16 and its predecessor in idle mode, but the new M4 Pro's increased power consumption becomes clearly evident under load. We measured around 75-85 watts when gaming, and a maximum of up to 138 watts in the stress test. This value then stabilized at 124 watts during the test, so the 140-watt power supply unit supplied is sufficient in size. However, things might get problematic with the M4 Max, but we will test this soon.

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro
M4 Pro 20-Core GPU, M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple SSD AP2048Z
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro
M3 Pro 18-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 12-Core, Apple SSD AP0512Z
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
Dell XPS 16 9640
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
Power Consumption
10%
-22%
-35%
-50%
2%
22%
Idle Minimum *
4.6
4.5
2%
7.3
-59%
8
-74%
9.9
-115%
7.7
-67%
4.8
-4%
Idle Average *
16.8
16.5
2%
12.3
27%
9.9
41%
16.6
1%
10.3
39%
7.5
55%
Idle Maximum *
17.1
16.7
2%
17.9
-5%
11.6
32%
29.2
-71%
10.6
38%
7.9
54%
Load Average *
76.4
60.4
21%
78.2
-2%
76.9
-1%
100.9
-32%
76.5
-0%
79.3
-4%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *
83.4
123.5
-48%
157.7
-89%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor *
79.3
117.7
-48%
156.6
-97%
Load Maximum *
138.1
102.9
25%
167.5
-21%
212.6
-54%
182.2
-32%
138.5
-0%
125
9%
Witcher 3 ultra *
52.1
151.8
126.4
79.2

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.24 / 0.41 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 4.6 / 16.8 / 17.1 Watt
Load midlight 76.4 / 138.1 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy

Power consumption Cyberpunk / stress test

0102030405060708090100110120130Tooltip
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø125.5 (117.5-138.1)
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø7.74 (7.48-9.31)
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø83.4 (79.7-86)

Power consumption with external monitor

05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø17.4 (16.6-23.2)
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø79.1 (77.2-80.6)
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø5.79 (5.58-6.52)
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø79.3 (77.3-81.3)

Runtimes

Battery information
Battery information

Nothing has changed about its battery capacity of 99.6 Wh, and the same can be said for its runtimes. The MBP's results were impressive as during the WLAN test at 150 cd/m², we noted almost 20 hours and at full SDR brightness, it still held on for almost 7.5 hours. During the video test at 150 cd/m², the MacBook even ran for over 24 hours before its battery was empty. When playing an HDR video at full brightness, we measured 6.5 hours. The direct Windows competition doesn't stand a chance against these runtimes.

A full charge with the device switched on takes 88 minutes using the 140-watt power supply unit. 50% of its capacity is available again after 26 minutes, 80% after 49 minutes and 90% after 63 minutes.

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
19h 38min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness
7h 19min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
24h 34min
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro
M4 Pro (14 cores), M4 Pro 20-Core GPU, 99.6 Wh
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro
Apple M3 Pro 12-Core, M3 Pro 18-Core GPU, 99.6 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGE
Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 84 Wh
Dell XPS 16 9640
Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 99.5 Wh
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 76 Wh
Average of class Multimedia
 
Battery Runtime
1%
-49%
-37%
-54%
-40%
-36%
-38%
H.264
1474
1481
0%
1260
-15%
988
-33%
1076
-27%
WiFi v1.3
1178
1204
2%
595
-49%
499
-58%
540
-54%
629
-47%
656
-44%

Notebookcheck total rating

The MacBook Pro 16 2024 has gotten a significant performance boost thanks to the M4 Pro and in addition, the large 16-inch laptop can make better use of the new M4 Pro than the smaller MacBook Pro 14. Its mini-LED screen remains the reference in the mobile sector and benefits from the additional SDR brightness and optional matte nano-texture surface. Combined with low emissions and long runtimes, the MacBook Pro 16 M4 Pro is one of the best multimedia laptops on the market.

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro - 11/14/2024 v8
Andreas Osthoff

Chassis
89 / 98 → 91%
Keyboard
92%
Pointing Device
100%
Connectivity
79 / 80 → 99%
Weight
62 / 20-74 → 78%
Battery
92 / 95 → 97%
Display
95%
Games Performance
80 / 88 → 91%
Application Performance
96 / 92 → 100%
Temperature
89%
Noise
90 / 95 → 95%
Audio
93%
Camera
38 / 75 → 51%
Average
75%
93%
Multimedia - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
59.2%
Materials
50%
Packaging
100%
Power Use
85.8%
Repairability
0%
Software Updates
50%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 57.5%

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Read all 17 comments / answer
static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 review - Enormous battery life and better performance of the M4 Pro
Andreas Osthoff, 2024-11-14 (Update: 2024-11-14)