Notebookcheck Logo
Teaser

Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 laptop review: RTX 5090 gamer with optional water cooling

Medion unpacks its claws.

The Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate is currently one of the fastest gaming notebooks on the market, which can be operated with external water cooling if desired. We compared the 16-inch model with the competition and let it loose on the latest games.
Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser, Brian Burriston (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇩🇪 🇫🇷 ...

Verdict - One of the fastest RTX 5090 notebooks

The Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 is certainly no bargain: For the top version MD62732 with Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090, 32 GB RAM and 2 TB SSD, you have to put more than 4,000 Euros (~$4539) on the table at the time of testing. We will analyze whether the surcharge compared to RTX 5080 devices is worth it in the course of this article. All in all, the 16-inch laptop received a "very good" rating, which is due to its performance, display and casing. The mini LED panel in 16:10 format (2,560 x 1,600 pixels, 300 Hz) scores points not least with its high brightness, rich contrast and wide color gamut, which should please not only gamers but also professional users.

The chassis cuts a high-quality figure thanks to the metal insert and impresses with its good stability. The input devices and connections are not bad either. The Erazer Beast 16 X1 offers a Thunderbolt 4 port, among other things. There are few points of criticism, but what bothered us the most in the test was the hefty noise development under load. Unfortunately, this shortcoming affects almost all gaming laptops.

If you want to get even more out of the laptop, you can purchase the optional Erazer Cooling Kit V2 for around 250 Euros (~$284). We will be publishing a separate article with a few suitable measurements shortly.

Pros

+ sturdy and high-quality metal housing
+ first-class mini LED panel
+ many (modern) connections
+ optional water cooling
+ convincing keyboard
+ privacy shutter
+ powerful sound
+ 24 GB GDDR7
+ fast SSD

Cons

- surcharge of the RTX 5090 version only partially justified apart from the VRAM
- fluctuating CPU performance
- quite loud under load

Price and availability

The Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate MD62732 is available for around 4,300 Euros (~$4879) on the Medion homepage (currently reduced to 4,090 Euros/~4641).

16-inch counterparts that also contain an RTX 5000 GPU are, for example, the HP Omen Max 16, the Asus ROG Strix Scar 16, the Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 and the Asus ROG Strix G16which all appear in the tables as comparison devices. However, the main competitor is the more or less identical XMG Neo 16 E25.

Specifications

Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate (Erazer Beast Series)
Processor
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX 24 x 2.1 - 5.4 GHz, 210 W PL2 / Short Burst, 210 W PL1 / Sustained, Arrow Lake-HX
Graphics adapter
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop - 24 GB VRAM, Core: 1597 MHz, RAM: 1750 MHz, 175 W TDP, GDDR7, ForceWare 576.52, Optimus
Memory
32 GB 
, 2x 16 GB SO-DIMM DDR5-5600, two slots (both in use)
Display
16.00 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 189 PPI, NE160QDM-NM9 (BOE0D5A), Mini-LED, glossy: no, HDR, 300 Hz
Mainboard
Intel HM870 (Arrow Lake-HX PCH)
Storage
Phison E31 2 TB, NVMe-SSD, two M.2 2280 slots (one empty)
Soundcard
Intel Arrow Point PCH - Audio Context Engine
Connections
2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: Line-In/Out, Card Reader: SD/SDHC/SDXC, Water Cooling Port
Networking
Realtek Gaming 2.5GbE Family Controller (10MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 30 x 357 x 245 ( = 1.18 x 14.06 x 9.65 in)
Battery
99 Wh Lithium-Polymer, 4 Cells
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
Webcam: FHD
Primary Camera: 2 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: 2.0, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 420 W Power Supply, Erazer Control Center, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
2.834 kg ( = 99.97 oz / 6.25 pounds), Power Supply: 656 g ( = 23.14 oz / 1.45 pounds)
Price
4300 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Case

As mentioned at the beginning, the casing leaves a very good impression. Medion has opted for a chassis from Tonfang, which remains pleasantly stable even under heavy pressure and generally has a very elegant feel. The design with its shapes and edges offers a nice mix of elegance and playfulness, and lighting fans can look forward to a stylish LED strip on the front (see photos). At 2.8 kg (~6.2 lbs), the weight is neither low nor particularly high, comparable to the Strix Scar 16 and Omen Max 16. At 3 cm the height is not excessive. The generous opening angle of 180° deserves special respect - not every competitor can manage this.

Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1

Size comparison

364.38 mm / 14.3 in 275.94 mm / 10.9 in 26.65 mm / 1.049 in 2.6 kg5.83 lbs357 mm / 14.1 in 245 mm / 9.65 in 30 mm / 1.181 in 2.8 kg6.25 lbs354 mm / 13.9 in 268 mm / 10.6 in 30.8 mm / 1.213 in 2.8 kg6.12 lbs354 mm / 13.9 in 268 mm / 10.6 in 30.8 mm / 1.213 in 2.6 kg5.75 lbs356.7 mm / 14 in 259.9 mm / 10.2 in 27.9 mm / 1.098 in 2.9 kg6.29 lbs357 mm / 14.1 in 269 mm / 10.6 in 24.9 mm / 0.98 in 2.8 kg6.19 lbs297 mm / 11.7 in 210 mm / 8.27 in 1 mm / 0.03937 in 5.7 g0.01257 lbs

Features

The Beast 16 X1 can boast all kinds of modern interfaces. 2.5 Gbit LAN is just as up-to-date as HDMI 2.1, (mini) DisplayPort 2.1a and Thunderbolt 4, as well as a USB-C 3.2 Gen2 port, two USB-A 3.2 Gen1 ports, an audio socket and a very fast card reader. The input for the external water cooling system is also located at the rear. There is also nothing to criticize about the performance of the wireless module; although the AX211 chip from Intel does not support Wi-Fi 7, it still achieves high to very high speeds.

We would describe the image quality of the webcam as average: Thanks to its Full HD resolution, it is somewhat sharper than the HD cams of some competitors, but you shouldn't expect miracles. Medion deserves plus points for the physical coverage. The Beast 16 X1 can be serviced after removing 10 Phillips screws and the casing base. The 16-inch model accommodates two SO-DIMM banks and two M.2-2280 slots (1x PCIe 5, 1x PCIe 4), which are each hidden under heat sinks. Speaking of the cooling system: the gaming machine is equipped with three fans.

Back
Back
right side
right side
left side
left side
left side
left side

SD Card Reader

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
191 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
123 MB/s -36%
Average of class Gaming
  (20 - 207, n=73, last 2 years)
106.1 MB/s -44%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
260.6 MB/s +4%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
251 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (25.8 - 261, n=72, last 2 years)
135.9 MB/s -46%

Communication

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1681 (1637min - 1732max) MBit/s +31%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
1648 (1560min - 1713max) MBit/s +28%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
1641 (1404min - 1722max) MBit/s +28%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1286 (1014min - 1359max) MBit/s
HP Omen Max 16 ah000
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
1270 (961min - 1408max) MBit/s -1%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (64 - 1921, n=259)
1230 MBit/s -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (469 - 1862, n=122, last 2 years)
1227 MBit/s -5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
1194 (998min - 1286max) MBit/s -7%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1717 (1648min - 1739max) MBit/s +5%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1642 (1345min - 1690max) MBit/s
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
1577 (1533min - 1598max) MBit/s -4%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
1574 (1553min - 1595max) MBit/s -4%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
1422 (1224min - 1482max) MBit/s -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (680 - 1741, n=122, last 2 years)
1403 MBit/s -15%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (582 - 1890, n=259)
1392 MBit/s -15%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
1312 (1065min - 1393max) MBit/s -20%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550160016501700Tooltip
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1286 (1014-1359)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1681 (1637-1732)
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1270 (961-1408)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1641 (1404-1722)
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1194 (998-1286)
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1648 (1560-1713)
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1642 (1345-1690)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1717 (1648-1739)
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1421 (1224-1482)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1573 (1553-1595)
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1311 (1065-1393)
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1576 (1533-1598)

Webcam

ColorChecker
10 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
5 ∆E
5 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
11.5 ∆E
6 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
9 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
11 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate: 7.48 ∆E min: 3.25 - max: 12.09 ∆E

Maintenance

Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1

Input devices

The keyboard of the Beast 16 X1 impresses with its very good feedback, which is almost on par with mechanical models. There is a dedicated numeric keypad on the right-hand side, whose keys are slightly narrower than the rest. Fans of directional arrows will rejoice at the normal dimensions of these keys. The built-in lighting (per-key RGB) can be adjusted to several levels.

The touchpad is largely inconspicuous in a positive sense in terms of precision, gliding properties and gesture support. With a size of 12.4 x 7.6 cm (~4.9 x 3.0 in), it has been adequately dimensioned. The click areas at the lower edge do trigger somewhat loudly, but have a solid (haptic) feedback similar to the keyboard.

Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1

Display

One of the biggest highlights of the Beast 16 X1 is its first-class mini LED display. Even out of the box, the 16-inch screen offers a fairly high level of color accuracy.

791
cd/m²
800
cd/m²
817
cd/m²
820
cd/m²
837
cd/m²
828
cd/m²
829
cd/m²
833
cd/m²
838
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
NE160QDM-NM9 (BOE0D5A) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 838 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 821.4 cd/m² Minimum: 14 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 837 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.59 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.83, calibrated: 1.03
ΔE Greyscale 2.4 | 0.09-98 Ø5.1
86.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.214
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
NE160QDM-NM9 (BOE0D5A), Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 16", 300 Hz
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
NE160QDM-NM9, Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 16", 300 Hz
HP Omen Max 16 ah000
Samsung ATNA60DL02-0, OLED, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
NE160QDM-NM8, Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
Samsung ATNA60HU01-0, OLED, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
NE160QDM-NZC, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz
Display
1%
4%
1%
3%
1%
Display P3 Coverage
99.7
99.9
0%
99.7
0%
99.9
0%
99.5
0%
99.1
-1%
sRGB Coverage
100
100
0%
100
0%
100
0%
100
0%
99.9
0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
86.9
88.5
2%
98.2
13%
88.4
2%
94.4
9%
89.1
3%
Response Times
-33%
87%
16%
88%
42%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
10 ?(4.7, 5.3)
17.4 ?(8.4, 9)
-74%
0.29 ?(0.15, 0.14)
97%
7 ?(5, 2)
30%
0.28 ?(0.14, 0.14)
97%
4.6 ?(2.1, 2.5)
54%
Response Time Black / White *
8.6 ?(4.2, 6.4)
13 ?(4.6, 8.4)
-51%
0.47 ?(0.25, 0.22)
95%
8.4 ?(4, 4.4)
2%
0.43 ?(0.22, 0.21)
95%
6.1 ?(1.6, 4.5)
29%
PWM Frequency
20457 ?(92)
20253
960 ?(100)
20555 ?(100)
1438 ?(100)
PWM Amplitude *
100
75
25%
31
69%
29
71%
Screen
-29%
-30%
23%
-17%
-4%
Brightness middle
837
888
6%
376.5
-55%
754
-10%
490.4
-41%
545
-35%
Brightness
821
859
5%
382
-53%
773
-6%
498
-39%
536
-35%
Brightness Distribution
94
94
0%
96
2%
91
-3%
97
3%
89
-5%
Black Level *
0.07
0.41
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.59
3.3
-108%
3.67
-131%
1
37%
3.2
-101%
1.6
-1%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
5.27
5.5
-4%
7.24
-37%
2
62%
6.04
-15%
4
24%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.03
1.5
-46%
0.94
9%
0.84
18%
0.8
22%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.4
3.8
-58%
1.1
54%
1
58%
1
58%
2.4
-0%
Gamma
2.214 99%
2.46 89%
2.25 98%
2.14 103%
2.24 98%
2.25 98%
CCT
6186 105%
6267 104%
6319 103%
6493 100%
6373 102%
6737 96%
Contrast
10771
1329
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-20% / -23%
20% / 5%
13% / 16%
25% / 12%
13% / 5%

* ... smaller is better

In general, the color space coverage of 100% sRGB or DCI-P3 and 87% AdobeRGB is impressive, although this also applies to the OLED or IPS panels of the competition. In terms of brightness (we tested in SDR mode; HDR can also be activated if desired), the Beast 16 X1 and the Neo 16 take the lead with an average of 821 cd/m², which is an excellent result.

CalMAN: Grayscale
CalMAN: Grayscale
CalMAN: Color saturation
CalMAN: Color saturation
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: Grayscale (calibrated)
CalMAN: Grayscale (calibrated)
CalMAN: Color saturation (calibrated)
CalMAN: Color saturation (calibrated)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (calibrated)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (calibrated)

In combination with the low black level, this results in excellent contrast. The response times are more on the level of a typical IPS panel.

Erazer Beast 16 X1 vs sRGB
Erazer Beast 16 X1 vs sRGB
Erazer Beast 16 X1 vs AdobeRGB
Erazer Beast 16 X1 vs AdobeRGB
Erazer Beast 16 X1 vs DCI-P3
Erazer Beast 16 X1 vs DCI-P3

Unfortunately, the screen struggles with flickering up to a brightness level of 92%. However, the frequency is so high that even sensitive people should not have any problems.

Daylight
Daylight
Subpixel
Subpixel
Viewing angle stability
Viewing angle stability

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
8.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 4.2 ms rise
↘ 6.4 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 22 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 4.7 ms rise
↘ 5.3 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.1 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 20457 Hz
Amplitude: 100 %
≤ 92 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 20457 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 92 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 20457 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8350 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

0 % brightness
0 % brightness
25 % brightness
25 % brightness
50 % brightness
50 % brightness
75 % brightness
75 % brightness
100 % brightness
100 % brightness

Performance

The Beast 16 X1 is available with either the RTX 5090 Laptop or the RTX 5080 Laptop so it belongs to the high-end segment in either case. With the latter GPU, the device costs around 1,000 Euros (~$1135) less, the surcharge for the RTX 5090 version is correspondingly high.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO
 
 

Test conditions

Practical: A special button (next to the power button) can be used to quickly switch between the operating modes. "Silence" lights up green, "Balance" blue and "Gaming" purple. The effects on the noise level and performance can be seen in the table below. With the exception of the battery test, our measurements were completed with the Gaming profile. There still seems to be a bug in the Erazer Control Center, which can also be used to switch modes: After (re)starting the notebook, only the Silent profile is ever selected here - at least in terms of the display.

Erazer Control Center
Erazer Control Center
Erazer Control Center
Erazer Control Center Mode Silence Balance Gaming
Cyberpunk 2077 Noise 42 dB(A) 48 dB(A) 55 dB(A)
Cyberpunk 2077 Performance (FHD/Ultra) 83.8 fps 148.6 fps 158.5 fps
Cinebench R15 Multi Score 3318 Points 4494 Points 6067 Points

Processor

The Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX from the Arrow Lake generation leaves mixed feelings in the Beast 16 X1. At first glance, the results are at the expected level or even higher in some cases. However, as our Cinebench loop has shown, performance dips occur in the meantime under prolonged load, which the competition is spared from.

Cinebench R15 Multi Endurance test

03156309451260157518902205252028353150346537804095441047255040535556705985Tooltip
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX: Ø5347 (4011.63-6161.43)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX: Ø6151 (6038.65-6270.58)
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX: Ø5145 (5108.56-5171.97)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX: Ø5832 (5537.87-5930.32)
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX: Ø5698 (5601.46-5746.3)
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX: Ø5851 (5702.07-5999.7)
CPU Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
86.7 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
83.3 pt
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
82.4 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
81.3 pt
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
 
80.4 pt
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
79.8 pt
HP Omen Max 16 ah000
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
74.8 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
61.9 pt
Cinebench R23
Multi Core
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
40951 Points +33%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
38039 Points +24%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
36597 (34151.5min - 36596.9max) Points +19%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (30712 - 40970, n=18)
35813 Points +17%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
34981 Points +14%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
33449 (32761.6min - 33449.1max) Points +9%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
30712 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (5668 - 40970, n=146, last 2 years)
24015 Points -22%
Single Core
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
2260 Points 0%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
2256 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
2195 Points -3%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
2192 Points -3%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (2009 - 2267, n=18)
2192 Points -3%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
2141 Points -5%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
2128 Points -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (1136 - 2267, n=146, last 2 years)
1952 Points -13%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
15881 Points +30%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
14828 Points +21%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
14183 Points +16%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (12026 - 16108, n=18)
14027 Points +14%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
13934 Points +14%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
13178 Points +8%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
12257 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (2179 - 16108, n=146, last 2 years)
9259 Points -24%
CPU (Single Core)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
869 Points 0%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
869 Points
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
859 Points -1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
843 Points -3%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (774 - 870, n=18)
843 Points -3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
831 Points -4%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
811 Points -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (439 - 870, n=146, last 2 years)
752 Points -13%
Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
6271 (6038.65min - 6270.58max) Points +2%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
6161 (4011.63min - 6161.43max) Points
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
6000 (5702.07min - 5999.7max) Points -3%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
5930 (5537.87min - 5930.32max) Points -4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
5746 (5601.46min - 5746.3max) Points -7%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (4756 - 6271, n=18)
5618 Points -9%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
5172 (5108.56min - 5171.97max) Points -16%
Average of class Gaming
  (1537 - 6271, n=146, last 2 years)
3729 Points -39%
CPU Single 64Bit
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
341 Points +1%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
340 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
340 Points +1%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
337 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
336 Points 0%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (306 - 343, n=19)
332 Points -1%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
317 Points -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (191.9 - 343, n=145, last 2 years)
289 Points -14%
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Average of class Gaming
  (80 - 517, n=143, last 2 years)
159.2 Seconds * -38%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
115 Seconds *
HP Omen Max 16 ah000
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
102 Seconds * +11%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (82 - 116, n=18)
95.5 Seconds * +17%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
90 Seconds * +22%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
87 Seconds * +24%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
86 Seconds * +25%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
83 Seconds * +28%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
124155 MIPS +3%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
121092 MIPS 0%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
120932 MIPS
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
118614 MIPS -2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
117940 MIPS -2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (98236 - 124155, n=18)
114488 MIPS -5%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
104686 MIPS -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (23795 - 148086, n=144, last 2 years)
89081 MIPS -26%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
7149 MIPS
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
7114 MIPS 0%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
7036 MIPS -2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (6063 - 7149, n=18)
6734 MIPS -6%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
6654 MIPS -7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
6607 MIPS -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (4199 - 7573, n=144, last 2 years)
6378 MIPS -11%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
6186 MIPS -13%
Geekbench 6.4
Multi-Core
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
20902 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
20890 Points +2%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
20443 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (16033 - 21668, n=19)
19546 Points -4%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
19535 Points -4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
19081 Points -7%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
18322 Points -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (5340 - 22104, n=140, last 2 years)
15261 Points -25%
Single-Core
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
3141 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
3109 Points -1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
3072 Points -2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (2886 - 3160, n=19)
3054 Points -3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
3052 Points -3%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
3012 Points -4%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
2917 Points -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (1490 - 3219, n=140, last 2 years)
2752 Points -12%
Geekbench 5.5
Multi-Core
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
25599 Points +3%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
24829 Points
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
24285 Points -2%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
23308 Points -6%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (19105 - 25855, n=18)
23094 Points -7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
22414 Points -10%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
21195 Points -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (4557 - 27010, n=143, last 2 years)
16172 Points -35%
Single-Core
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
2264 Points +1%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
2250 Points
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
2235 Points -1%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (2033 - 2292, n=18)
2207 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
2199 Points -2%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
2177 Points -3%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
2034 Points -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (986 - 2423, n=143, last 2 years)
1979 Points -12%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
43.2 fps +4%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
41.5 fps
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
40.4 fps -3%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
40.2 fps -3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
38.9 fps -6%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (30.7 - 43.8, n=18)
38.2 fps -8%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
35 fps -16%
Average of class Gaming
  (7.7 - 44.3, n=144, last 2 years)
26 fps -37%
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
57.8 s *
Average of class Gaming
  (19 - 96.6, n=142, last 2 years)
47.5 s * +18%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (33.2 - 62.1, n=18)
42.3 s * +27%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
41.4 s * +28%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
40.7 s * +30%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
40.5 s * +30%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
39.8 s * +31%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
36.9 s * +36%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
HP Omen Max 16 ah000
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
0.4568 sec * -14%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.3551 - 0.759, n=145, last 2 years)
0.4301 sec * -7%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
0.4141 sec * -3%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (0.3943 - 0.4568, n=18)
0.4141 sec * -3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
0.4132 sec * -3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
0.4053 sec * -1%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
0.4011 sec *
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
0.3978 sec * +1%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
6161 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
296 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
337 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
869 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
12257 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
30712 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
2256 Points
Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
1547 Points
Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
136 Points
Help
Performance Rating
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
99.3 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
98.2 pt
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
96.7 pt
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
96.5 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
93.7 pt
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
 
91.5 pt
HP Omen Max 16 ah000
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
86.7 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
71.5 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
39895 KRay/s +4%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
39551 KRay/s +3%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
39164 KRay/s +2%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
38481 KRay/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
35760 KRay/s -7%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (28067 - 39895, n=17)
35715 KRay/s -7%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
34180 KRay/s -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (7192 - 85542, n=143, last 2 years)
26522 KRay/s -31%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
198802 Points +5%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
192417 Points +1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
191476 Points +1%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
189586 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
183428 Points -3%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (140254 - 200744, n=17)
180003 Points -5%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
173656 Points -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (35040 - 252486, n=143, last 2 years)
122105 Points -36%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
9734 MB/s +5%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
9480 MB/s +2%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
9458 MB/s +2%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
9263 MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
8828 MB/s -5%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (6766 - 9734, n=17)
8671 MB/s -6%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
8315 MB/s -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (1728 - 10389, n=143, last 2 years)
5583 MB/s -40%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
140695 Points +1%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
139554 Points
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
138882 Points 0%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
138622 Points -1%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
137820 Points -1%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (113887 - 140937, n=17)
133807 Points -4%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
128670 Points -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (50699 - 200651, n=143, last 2 years)
118496 Points -15%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
14415 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
14382 Points 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (5020 - 33636, n=143, last 2 years)
14084 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
13969 Points -3%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
13955 Points -3%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
13926 Points -3%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (11172 - 14415, n=17)
13509 Points -6%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
12272 Points -15%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
102847 Points +4%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
102630 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
102544 Points +4%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
98647 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
95742 Points -3%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (72596 - 104217, n=17)
93808 Points -5%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
90980 Points -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (17585 - 134044, n=143, last 2 years)
62654 Points -36%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
136847 MB/s 0%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
136767 MB/s
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
134429 MB/s -2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
134042 MB/s -2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
134008 MB/s -2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (107195 - 136847, n=17)
128002 MB/s -6%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
118108 MB/s -14%
Average of class Gaming
  (19065 - 328679, n=143, last 2 years)
109554 MB/s -20%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
2263 MB/s +1%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
2238 MB/s
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
2202 MB/s -2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
2179 MB/s -3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
2067 MB/s -8%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (1599 - 2263, n=17)
2047 MB/s -9%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
1896 MB/s -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (373 - 2531, n=143, last 2 years)
1478 MB/s -34%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
21185 KRay/s +2%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
21122 KRay/s +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
20910 KRay/s +1%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
20672 KRay/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
19630 KRay/s -5%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (14847 - 21542, n=17)
19216 KRay/s -7%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
18490 KRay/s -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (3856 - 45446, n=143, last 2 years)
14241 KRay/s -31%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
56613 MPixel/s +15%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
53630 MPixel/s +9%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
53522 MPixel/s +9%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (39524 - 62916, n=17)
51572 MPixel/s +5%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
49190 MPixel/s
HP Omen Max 16 ah000
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
49039 MPixel/s 0%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
47726 MPixel/s -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (10805 - 62916, n=143, last 2 years)
42068 MPixel/s -14%

System performance

In terms of system performance, however, the Medion laptop takes the top spot when it comes to the overall rating.

Performance Rating: Percent
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
Performance Rating
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB
90.9 pt
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN
89.1 pt
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
 
89.1 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB
87.9 pt
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Phison E31 2 TB
87.7 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
87.6 pt
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 -1!
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WDC PC SN810 2TB
84.6 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
79.4 pt
PCMark 10 / Score
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
9153 Points +7%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB
9032 Points +6%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN
8856 Points +4%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB
8819 Points +4%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WDC PC SN810 2TB
8794 Points +3%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (8221 - 9497, n=9)
8706 Points +2%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Phison E31 2 TB
8518 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (5776 - 9852, n=130, last 2 years)
8039 Points -6%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Phison E31 2 TB
11369 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
11215 Points -1%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN
11177 Points -2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB
11162 Points -2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB
11103 Points -2%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WDC PC SN810 2TB
10969 Points -4%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (9994 - 11369, n=9)
10933 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (9057 - 12600, n=130, last 2 years)
10784 Points -5%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Average of class Gaming
  (6662 - 14612, n=130, last 2 years)
9861 Points +4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
9590 Points +1%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (9122 - 10925, n=9)
9536 Points 0%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Phison E31 2 TB
9515 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB
9317 Points -2%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN
9212 Points -3%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB
9164 Points -4%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WDC PC SN810 2TB
9122 Points -4%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
19351 Points +25%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB
19227 Points +24%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WDC PC SN810 2TB
18445 Points +19%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN
18305 Points +18%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB
18293 Points +18%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (14493 - 19234, n=9)
17237 Points +11%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Phison E31 2 TB
15507 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (7440 - 19351, n=130, last 2 years)
13431 Points -13%
CrossMark / Overall
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB
2249 Points +2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (1995 - 2339, n=9)
2218 Points 0%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Phison E31 2 TB
2211 Points
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN
2165 Points -2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB
2144 Points -3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
2017 Points -9%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WDC PC SN810 2TB
1995 Points -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (1247 - 2344, n=112, last 2 years)
1964 Points -11%
CrossMark / Productivity
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB
2062 Points +1%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (1847 - 2211, n=9)
2047 Points 0%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Phison E31 2 TB
2040 Points
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN
2014 Points -1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB
1948 Points -5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
1922 Points -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (1299 - 2211, n=112, last 2 years)
1852 Points -9%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WDC PC SN810 2TB
1847 Points -9%
CrossMark / Creativity
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB
2612 Points +2%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Phison E31 2 TB
2570 Points
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB
2556 Points -1%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (2285 - 2642, n=9)
2526 Points -2%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN
2451 Points -5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
2288 Points -11%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WDC PC SN810 2TB
2285 Points -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (1275 - 2729, n=112, last 2 years)
2181 Points -15%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (1673 - 2217, n=9)
1918 Points +7%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB
1864 Points +4%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN
1853 Points +3%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Phison E31 2 TB
1793 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (1030 - 2330, n=112, last 2 years)
1728 Points -4%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB
1686 Points -6%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WDC PC SN810 2TB
1673 Points -7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
1597 Points -11%
WebXPRT 3 / Overall
HP Omen Max 16 ah000
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WDC PC SN810 2TB
359 Points +8%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
359 Points +8%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB
349 Points +5%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN
347 Points +5%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (315 - 362, n=9)
345 Points +4%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB
344 Points +4%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Phison E31 2 TB
331 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (237 - 532, n=124, last 2 years)
314 Points -5%
WebXPRT 4 / Overall
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB
337 Points +1%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN
336 Points 0%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Phison E31 2 TB
335 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
333 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB
333 Points -1%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (317 - 341, n=8)
331 Points -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (176.4 - 341, n=111, last 2 years)
279 Points -17%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
Average of class Gaming
  (397 - 674, n=134, last 2 years)
481 ms * -17%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WDC PC SN810 2TB
420 ms * -2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB
412 ms * -0%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Phison E31 2 TB
411 ms *
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (402 - 420, n=9)
411 ms * -0%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
408 ms * +1%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN
405 ms * +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB
404 ms * +2%

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 10 Score
8518 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
86978 MB/s +9%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
86549 MB/s +9%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
85644 MB/s +8%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
84020 MB/s +6%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (63022 - 94460, n=17)
81293 MB/s +2%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
79577 MB/s
HP Omen Max 16 ah000
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
77500 MB/s -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (21750 - 97515, n=143, last 2 years)
69572 MB/s -13%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
97151 MB/s +12%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
95542 MB/s +11%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
87760 MB/s +2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (65869 - 97151, n=17)
86694 MB/s 0%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
86460 MB/s
HP Omen Max 16 ah000
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
84473 MB/s -2%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
83408 MB/s -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (22956 - 104349, n=143, last 2 years)
72661 MB/s -16%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
85648 MB/s +11%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
84581 MB/s +9%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
82159 MB/s +6%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (61633 - 105456, n=17)
80435 MB/s +4%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
77637 MB/s 0%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
77505 MB/s
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
73246 MB/s -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (22297 - 133486, n=143, last 2 years)
71819 MB/s -7%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
HP Omen Max 16 ah000
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
118.7 ns * -8%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (105.8 - 151.7, n=17)
115.9 ns * -5%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
111.7 ns * -1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
111.2 ns * -1%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
110.2 ns *
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
109.3 ns * +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
107.7 ns * +2%
Average of class Gaming
  (59.5 - 259, n=143, last 2 years)
100.2 ns * +9%

* ... smaller is better

DPC latencies

The latencies also give no cause for complaint. According to the LatencyMon tool, there should be no problems with audio and video processing in real time.

LatencyMon
LatencyMon
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB
2296.5 μs * -152%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WDC PC SN810 2TB
1516.1 μs * -66%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN
1501.6 μs * -65%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB
1465.8 μs * -61%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Phison E31 2 TB
911.5 μs *
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
464.2 μs * +49%

* ... smaller is better

Storage devices

The mass storage is also impressive. Sequentially, the built-in PCIe 5 drive from Phison achieves around 10,000 MB/s at best, although you could also expect a 4 TB model instead of 2 TB for the price. Top: In contrast to the CPU performance, the SSD performance remains stable.

Phison E31 2 TB
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 10121 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 6315 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 545.8 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 452.2 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 4573 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 4438 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 83.02 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 155.6 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB
79.8 pt
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
Phison E31 2 TB
71.5 pt
Average Phison E31 2 TB
 
69.3 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
66.6 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
66.2 pt
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN
63.2 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
WD PC SN8000S 2TB
58.4 pt
HP Omen Max 16 ah000
WDC PC SN810 2TB
51.3 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB
5861 (5825.98min - 5861.12max) MB/s +48%
Average Phison E31 2 TB
  (3968 - 4598, n=3)
4355 MB/s +10%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
3998 (3658.3min - 3998.4max) MB/s +1%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
Phison E31 2 TB
3968 (3897.56min - 3968.05max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (281 - 8300, n=126, last 2 years)
3473 MB/s -12%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000
WDC PC SN810 2TB
3415 (3349.37min - 3415.42max) MB/s -14%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN
348 (183.29min - 348.13max) MB/s -91%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
WD PC SN8000S 2TB
331 (68.02min - 331.14max) MB/s -92%
seq write
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB
4387 (4285.53min - 4387.28max) MB/s +34%
Average of class Gaming
  (1247 - 9699, n=126, last 2 years)
3961 MB/s +21%
Average Phison E31 2 TB
  (3272 - 4487, n=3)
3816 MB/s +17%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
Phison E31 2 TB
3272 (3073.73min - 3272.14max) MB/s
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
WD PC SN8000S 2TB
3016 (2843.5min - 3016.38max) MB/s -8%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN
2759 (2615.78min - 2759.16max) MB/s -16%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000
WDC PC SN810 2TB
2570 (2187.36min - 2569.74max) MB/s -21%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
1922 (1819.62min - 1921.76max) MB/s -41%
seq q8 t1 read
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB
13091 (10532.2min - 13090.8max) MB/s +34%
Average Phison E31 2 TB
  (9744 - 9937, n=3)
9813 MB/s +1%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
Phison E31 2 TB
9744 (8105.91min - 9743.59max) MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
7069 (5962.41min - 7069.08max) MB/s -27%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
WD PC SN8000S 2TB
6880 (6106.07min - 6880.21max) MB/s -29%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000
WDC PC SN810 2TB
6766 (5345.22min - 6765.62max) MB/s -31%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN
6749 (5697.47min - 6748.77max) MB/s -31%
Average of class Gaming
  (2594 - 15056, n=126, last 2 years)
6708 MB/s -31%
seq q8 t1 write
Average Phison E31 2 TB
  (6525 - 8173, n=3)
7463 MB/s +14%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB
7264 (5656.44min - 7264.06max) MB/s +11%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
Phison E31 2 TB
6525 (4526.28min - 6524.61max) MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
6169 (6112.09min - 6168.56max) MB/s -5%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN
5343 (5220.28min - 5342.91max) MB/s -18%
Average of class Gaming
  (1281 - 13519, n=126, last 2 years)
5297 MB/s -19%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
WD PC SN8000S 2TB
5275 (5153.09min - 5274.69max) MB/s -19%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000
WDC PC SN810 2TB
5187 (5110.55min - 5187.31max) MB/s -21%
4k q1 t1 read
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB
77.4 (77.02min - 77.43max) MB/s +3%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
Phison E31 2 TB
75.2 (73.03min - 75.16max) MB/s
Average Phison E31 2 TB
  (74.1 - 75.2, n=3)
74.6 MB/s -1%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN
70.9 (23.28min - 70.91max) MB/s -6%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
WD PC SN8000S 2TB
69.6 (64.94min - 69.55max) MB/s -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (32.2 - 110.2, n=126, last 2 years)
68.4 MB/s -9%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
68.3 (67.41min - 68.26max) MB/s -9%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000
WDC PC SN810 2TB
57.4 (57.08min - 57.42max) MB/s -24%
4k q1 t1 write
Average of class Gaming
  (78 - 397, n=126, last 2 years)
216 MB/s +35%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN
178.9 (178.49min - 178.93max) MB/s +12%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
Phison E31 2 TB
160.3 (157.41min - 160.31max) MB/s
Average Phison E31 2 TB
  (158.3 - 160.9, n=3)
159.8 MB/s 0%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
WD PC SN8000S 2TB
159.4 (153.59min - 159.38max) MB/s -1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB
157 (155.82min - 156.95max) MB/s -2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
153.8 (106.82min - 153.79max) MB/s -4%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000
WDC PC SN810 2TB
149.4 (92.02min - 149.43max) MB/s -7%
4k q32 t16 read
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
4760 (4699.8min - 4760.03max) MB/s +402%
Average of class Gaming
  (417 - 8067, n=126, last 2 years)
2547 MB/s +169%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000
WDC PC SN810 2TB
982 (747.27min - 982.13max) MB/s +4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB
961 (945.93min - 961.25max) MB/s +1%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
Phison E31 2 TB
948 (837.88min - 947.74max) MB/s
Average Phison E31 2 TB
  (908 - 955, n=3)
937 MB/s -1%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN
722 (696.56min - 722.01max) MB/s -24%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
WD PC SN8000S 2TB
679 (591.01min - 678.88max) MB/s -28%
4k q32 t16 write
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
4433 (4354.58min - 4433.43max) MB/s +699%
Average of class Gaming
  (162.3 - 5653, n=126, last 2 years)
2086 MB/s +276%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN
572 (544.97min - 572.01max) MB/s +3%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
Phison E31 2 TB
555 (533.82min - 554.71max) MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB
544 (523.14min - 543.91max) MB/s -2%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000
WDC PC SN810 2TB
520 (486.41min - 520.16max) MB/s -6%
Average Phison E31 2 TB
  (458 - 555, n=3)
509 MB/s -8%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
WD PC SN8000S 2TB
505 (461.27min - 504.83max) MB/s -9%
AS SSD
Score Total
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB
8857 Points +12%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
Phison E31 2 TB
7940 Points
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
WD PC SN8000S 2TB
7590 Points -4%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN
7478 Points -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (2319 - 13854, n=124, last 2 years)
6837 Points -14%
Average Phison E31 2 TB
  (5424 - 7940, n=3)
6670 Points -16%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
6515 Points -18%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000
WDC PC SN810 2TB
5355 Points -33%
Score Read
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
3234 Points +84%
Average of class Gaming
  (776 - 4721, n=124, last 2 years)
2379 Points +35%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB
2056 Points +17%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
Phison E31 2 TB
1758 Points
Average Phison E31 2 TB
  (1522 - 1764, n=3)
1681 Points -4%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN
1667 Points -5%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000
WDC PC SN810 2TB
1569 Points -11%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
WD PC SN8000S 2TB
1541 Points -12%
Score Write
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB
5936 Points +10%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
Phison E31 2 TB
5380 Points
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
WD PC SN8000S 2TB
5263 Points -2%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN
5036 Points -6%
Average Phison E31 2 TB
  (3217 - 5380, n=3)
4225 Points -21%
Average of class Gaming
  (989 - 7208, n=124, last 2 years)
3306 Points -39%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000
WDC PC SN810 2TB
3074 Points -43%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
1837 Points -66%
Seq Read
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB
9653 MB/s +41%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
Phison E31 2 TB
6860.6 MB/s
Average Phison E31 2 TB
  (6602 - 6861, n=3)
6764 MB/s -1%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
5688.57 MB/s -17%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN
5315 MB/s -23%
Average of class Gaming
  (2260 - 9890, n=124, last 2 years)
5161 MB/s -25%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000
WDC PC SN810 2TB
5105.48 MB/s -26%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
WD PC SN8000S 2TB
4260 MB/s -38%
Seq Write
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB
5562 MB/s +23%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
Phison E31 2 TB
4523.93 MB/s
Average Phison E31 2 TB
  (4399 - 4524, n=3)
4468 MB/s -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (722 - 9926, n=124, last 2 years)
3965 MB/s -12%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
WD PC SN8000S 2TB
3812 MB/s -16%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN
3444 MB/s -24%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000
WDC PC SN810 2TB
3100.36 MB/s -31%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
1587.46 MB/s -65%
4K Read
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB
81.6 MB/s +3%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
Phison E31 2 TB
78.94 MB/s
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
WD PC SN8000S 2TB
75.6 MB/s -4%
Average Phison E31 2 TB
  (67.5 - 79.1, n=3)
75.2 MB/s -5%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN
72.3 MB/s -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (27.8 - 112.1, n=124, last 2 years)
67.5 MB/s -14%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
63.16 MB/s -20%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000
WDC PC SN810 2TB
54.74 MB/s -31%
4K Write
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN
283 MB/s +15%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
250.73 MB/s +2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
WD PC SN8000S 2TB
249 MB/s +1%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
Phison E31 2 TB
245.88 MB/s
Average Phison E31 2 TB
  (219 - 246, n=3)
235 MB/s -4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB
226 MB/s -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (75.6 - 512, n=124, last 2 years)
217 MB/s -12%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000
WDC PC SN810 2TB
185.44 MB/s -25%
4K-64 Read
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
2602.02 MB/s +162%
Average of class Gaming
  (451 - 3630, n=124, last 2 years)
1789 MB/s +80%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN
1063 MB/s +7%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
WD PC SN8000S 2TB
1039 MB/s +5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB
1010 MB/s +2%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000
WDC PC SN810 2TB
1004.03 MB/s +1%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
Phison E31 2 TB
993.4 MB/s
Average Phison E31 2 TB
  (795 - 1002, n=3)
930 MB/s -6%
4K-64 Write
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB
5155 MB/s +10%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
Phison E31 2 TB
4681.46 MB/s
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
WD PC SN8000S 2TB
4633 MB/s -1%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN
4408 MB/s -6%
Average Phison E31 2 TB
  (2558 - 4681, n=3)
3543 MB/s -24%
Average of class Gaming
  (521 - 5909, n=124, last 2 years)
2697 MB/s -42%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000
WDC PC SN810 2TB
2578.56 MB/s -45%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
1427.9 MB/s -69%
Access Time Read
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
WD PC SN8000S 2TB
0.116 ms * -252%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.016 - 0.379, n=124, last 2 years)
0.05627 ms * -71%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000
WDC PC SN810 2TB
0.054 ms * -64%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB
0.052 ms * -58%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
0.033 ms * -0%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
Phison E31 2 TB
0.033 ms *
Average Phison E31 2 TB
  (0.03 - 0.036, n=3)
0.033 ms * -0%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN
0.032 ms * +3%
Access Time Write
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
0.073 ms * -387%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000
WDC PC SN810 2TB
0.06 ms * -300%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.011 - 1.028, n=124, last 2 years)
0.04806 ms * -220%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB
0.017 ms * -13%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
WD PC SN8000S 2TB
0.016 ms * -7%
Average Phison E31 2 TB
  (0.015 - 0.016, n=3)
0.01567 ms * -4%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
Phison E31 2 TB
0.015 ms *
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN
0.014 ms * +7%

* ... smaller is better

Continuous read load: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

06651330199526603325399046555320598566507315798086459310997510640113051197012635Tooltip
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate Phison E31 2 TB; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø9721 (7725.97-10000.27)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø12826 (9538.48-13255.8)
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 WDC PC SN810 2TB; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6758 (5656.01-6797.71)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 WD PC SN8000S 2TB; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6749 (5892.12-6839.65)
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6982 (5720.4-7017.72)
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6701 (2591.93-6810.51)

GPU performance

Compared to the RTX 5080, the RTX 5090 offers a full 24 GB of GDDR7 VRAM instead of 16 GB. In the GPU tests, the Beast 16 X1 delivers a very good performance and is often a few percent ahead of the competition or the previously determined average for the RTX 5090. However, the RTX 5080 is only partially left behind when you look at the opponents.

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
99.1 pt
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
98 pt
HP Omen Max 16 ah000
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
95.9 pt
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
 
94.5 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
91.4 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
91.1 pt
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
82.4 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
61.5 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
76300 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
73596 Points -4%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
72215 Points -5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
71866 Points -6%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (54052 - 76300, n=14)
67885 Points -11%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
63549 Points -17%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
61156 Points -20%
Average of class Gaming
  (10741 - 76300, n=138, last 2 years)
47511 Points -38%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
54791 Points +1%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
54220 Points
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (42516 - 62849, n=15)
52408 Points -3%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
49297 Points -9%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
49153 Points -9%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
49115 Points -9%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
48891 Points -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (2913 - 62849, n=151, last 2 years)
34427 Points -37%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
25040 Points +4%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
24873 Points +4%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
23967 Points
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (19216 - 25763, n=15)
23923 Points 0%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
23600 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
23003 Points -4%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
21571 Points -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (2295 - 25763, n=147, last 2 years)
14542 Points -39%
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
16250 Points +3%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
16245 Points +3%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (12749 - 17063, n=12)
15912 Points +1%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
15788 Points
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
15721 Points 0%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
14620 Points -7%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
12068 Points -24%
Average of class Gaming
  (984 - 16978, n=85, last 2 years)
10189 Points -35%
3DMark 11 Performance
54178 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
75355 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
42189 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
22368 points
Help

Gaming performance

The situation is similar in the gaming tests. Here too, the RTX 5090 sometimes performs barely faster than the RTX 5080, especially at moderate resolutions (Full HD).

Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 -1!
GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
99.7 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
97.3 pt
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
94 pt
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
 
93.9 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
93.6 pt
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 -2!
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
92 pt
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
91.4 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
71.2 pt
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
158.5 (122min) fps
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
156.2 (125.7min, 114.4P1) fps -1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
154.8 (123.7min) fps -2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
153.6 (124.2min) fps -3%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
151.9 (117.7min, 106.2P1) fps -4%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (105.3 - 167.3, n=15)
150.5 fps -5%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
144.3 (118.2min) fps -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (6.76 - 166.5, n=121, last 2 years)
100 fps -37%
Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
211.5 fps +6%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
201 fps +1%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
200 (86min, 110.5P0.1, 152.2P1) fps
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (143.1 - 237, n=14)
200 fps 0%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
193.3 fps -3%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
180.3 fps -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (34.5 - 246, n=86, last 2 years)
133.3 fps -33%
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
164.1 (2.25min, 125P1) fps +15%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
164.1 (3.7min, 100P1) fps +15%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
162.8 (3.33min, 111.1P1) fps +14%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (121.6 - 186.9, n=11)
155.6 fps +9%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
142.4 (3.25min, 90.9P1) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (12.1 - 186.9, n=125, last 2 years)
120.5 fps -15%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
210 fps +2%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
205 fps
HP Omen Max 16 ah000
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
203 fps -1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
203 fps -1%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (147.4 - 215, n=14)
196.3 fps -4%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
194.6 fps -5%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
189.6 fps -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (19.2 - 215, n=141, last 2 years)
131.1 fps -36%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
188.9 (155.7min) fps +7%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
185.6 (154.7min) fps +5%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
176.4 (144.9min) fps
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (137.1 - 248, n=14)
175.6 fps 0%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
175.5 (149.8min) fps -1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
167.2 (136.1min) fps -5%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
161 (134.6min) fps -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (65.1 - 248, n=144, last 2 years)
153.3 fps -13%
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
124.5 fps +9%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
119.5 fps +5%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
115.9 fps +1%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (85.2 - 133.6, n=14)
115.2 fps +1%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
114.2 fps
HP Omen Max 16 ah000
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
112.6 fps -1%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
110.6 fps -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (33.4 - 166.2, n=146, last 2 years)
104.7 fps -8%

When using QHD resolutions, the distances increase and there are usually still enough reserves for maximum settings. Of the games tested, only F1 25 (with path tracing) and the moderately optimized Oblivion Remastered were not above the 60 FPS mark. If things get tight in the future, upscaling and (multi) frame generation can help. The performance increases that are possible as a result can be seen in the table below; including DLSS Quality and FG, the frame rate doubles in Stalker 2 for example.

Stalker 2
2560x1440 Epic Preset
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
65.4 (48min, 48.4P0.1, 53.9P1) fps
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (59.8 - 65.4, n=2)
62.6 fps -4%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
59.8 (43.5min, 47.2P0.1, 50.8P1) fps -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (31.7 - 65.4, n=9, last 2 years)
46 fps -30%
2560x1440 Epic Preset + Quality DLSS + FG
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
134.6 (53.6min, 56.4P0.1, 70.8P1) fps
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (124.9 - 134.6, n=2)
129.8 fps -4%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
124.9 (11.4min, 54.8P0.1, 70.7P1) fps -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (58.3 - 134.6, n=9, last 2 years)
94.3 fps -30%
Doom: The Dark Ages
2560x1440 Ultra Nightmare AA:T
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
82.1 (53.2min, 58.4P0.1, 63.3P1) fps
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (77 - 82.1, n=2)
79.6 fps -3%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
65 (51.8P0.1, 52.5P1) fps -21%
Average of class Gaming
  (35 - 82.1, n=11, last 2 years)
56.3 fps -31%
2560x1440 Ultra Nightmare - DLSS Quality
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
107.3 (80.4min, 81.6P0.1, 86.2P1) fps
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (102.3 - 107.3, n=2)
104.8 fps -2%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
89.1 (72.6P0.1, 76.3P1) fps -17%
Average of class Gaming
  (54.6 - 107.3, n=10, last 2 years)
78.8 fps -27%
F1 25
2560x1440 Ultra Max Preset AA:T AF:16x
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (34 - 37.5, n=5)
36 fps +6%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
34 (19min) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (9.33 - 37.5, n=11, last 2 years)
24 fps -29%
2560x1440 Ultra Max Preset + DLSS Quality AA:DLSS AF:16x
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (61 - 67.5, n=3)
64.2 fps +5%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
61 (37min) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (18.3 - 67.5, n=10, last 2 years)
41.6 fps -32%
The Elder Scrolls IV Oblivion Remastered
2560x1440 Ultra Preset AA:T
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
41.7 (18.7min, 21P0.1, 34P1) fps
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (n=1)
41.7 fps 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.7 - 41.7, n=7, last 2 years)
27.2 fps -35%
2560x1440 Ultra Preset + Quality DLSS
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
59.7 (27min, 28.7P0.1, 48.2P1) fps
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (n=1)
59.7 fps 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (25.3 - 59.7, n=7, last 2 years)
41 fps -31%
Kingdom Come Deliverance 2
2560x1440 Ultra Preset
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
86 (71.2min, 73.4P0.1, 75.7P1) fps
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (82.6 - 86, n=2)
84.3 fps -2%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
82.6 (69.1min, 70.2P0.1, 71.4P1) fps -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (42.6 - 86, n=8, last 2 years)
62.3 fps -28%
2560x1440 Ultra Preset + Quality DLSS
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
114.5 (83.8min, 95.5P0.1, 98.2P1) fps
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (98.7 - 114.5, n=2)
106.6 fps -7%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
98.7 (74.9min, 78.7P0.1, 82.3P1) fps -14%
Average of class Gaming
  (57.6 - 114.5, n=8, last 2 years)
81.9 fps -28%
Until Dawn
2560x1440 Ultra Preset
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
69.5 (16.3min, 22.3P0.1, 40.3P1) fps
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (65.6 - 69.5, n=2)
67.6 fps -3%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
65.6 (18.7min, 21.9P0.1, 49.1P1) fps -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (32.9 - 69.5, n=7, last 2 years)
49.4 fps -29%
2560x1440 Ultra Preset + Quality DLSS + Ray Tracing
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
86.3 (20.9min, 24P0.1, 40.6P1) fps
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (79.7 - 86.3, n=2)
83 fps -4%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
79.7 (16.5min, 19P0.1, 44.3P1) fps -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (41.5 - 86.3, n=7, last 2 years)
62.3 fps -28%
Space Marine 2
2560x1440 Ultra Preset AA:T
Aorus Master 18 AM8H
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
98.6 (62.2min, 67.7P0.1, 80.9P1) fps +1%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (97.2 - 98.6, n=2)
97.9 fps +1%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
97.2 (67.8min, 70.8P0.1, 80.4P1) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (48.2 - 98.6, n=7, last 2 years)
73.4 fps -24%
2560x1440 Ultra Preset + Quality DLSS
Aorus Master 18 AM8H
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
100.8 (66.6min, 75.5P0.1, 80.2P1) fps +3%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (97.5 - 100.8, n=2)
99.2 fps +2%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
97.5 (67.3min, 72.8P0.1, 82P1) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (58.5 - 100.8, n=7, last 2 years)
79.5 fps -18%
Star Wars Outlaws
2560x1440 cinem. ultra
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
61 (31.8min, 34.1P0.1, 36.5P1) fps
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (54 - 61, n=2)
57.5 fps -6%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
54 (30.4min, 30.5P0.1, 31.3P1) fps -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (23.3 - 61, n=7, last 2 years)
41.8 fps -31%
2560x1440 cinem. ultra DLSS
Aorus Master 18 AM8H
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
70.9 (36.8min, 37.8P0.1, 43.1P1) fps 0%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (70.8 - 70.9, n=2)
70.9 fps 0%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
70.8 (42.5min, 44.5P0.1, 50.9P1) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (34.1 - 70.9, n=7, last 2 years)
54.9 fps -22%
lowmed.highultraQHD DLSSQHD
GTA V (2015) 187.5 185.3 142.4 133.4
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 234 204 193 176.4
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 234 205 172.2
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 161.6 139.2 114.2
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) 217 202 200 151
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) 188.1 171.9 158.5 110.8
Star Wars Outlaws (2024) 79.3 72.7 70 70.8 61
Space Marine 2 (2024) 102.8 102.1 101.4 97.5 97.2
Until Dawn (2024) 109.9 102.4 93.9 86.3 69.5
Stalker 2 (2024) 106.1 92.6 81.8 134.6 65.4
Kingdom Come Deliverance 2 (2025) 195.8 165.7 118.5 114.5 86
Civilization 7 (2025) 231 225 184.9
The Elder Scrolls IV Oblivion Remastered (2025) 118.4 104.2 57.5 59.7 41.7
Doom: The Dark Ages (2025) 124.3 113.9 111.3 107.3 82.1
F1 25 (2025) 256 241 57 61 34

Prolonged GPU load leads to a slight drop in performance on the Beast 16 X1. However, the FPS loss is limited. Our Cyberpunk-Test illustrates the phenomenon (red line).

Cyberpunk 2077 Ultra settings FPS chart

0102030405060708090100110120130140150Tooltip
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop: Ø146 (136.1-155)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop: Ø148.8 (139-150.3)
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop: Ø151.4 (144.3-153.7)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop: Ø144.4 (132.4-147.8)
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop: Ø140.9 (134-145)
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop: Ø128.4 (121.7-130.5)

Emissions

Noise emissions

The 16-incher is just as loud as the competition under load. Just under 55 dB(A) in typical gaming mode is clearly audible and calls for a headset. The Medion laptop is much quieter in idle mode, where the fans usually reach between 25 and 29 dB(A).

Noise Level

Idle
25 / 27 / 29 dB(A)
Load
52 / 55 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 24 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2042.842.837.242.746.542.82540.238.23940.134.637.93144.244.943.649.340.844.74030.429.329.436.525.428.65038.338.438.138.13827.76328.223.921.920.420.7308024.318.715.517.215.142.110026.416.81617.414.628.612530.420.415.718.61331.71602820.317.618.915.930.52003022.524.322.417.731.325031.122.418.219.816.734.431533.821.61617.413.136.24003722.717.218.811.939.950038.122.716.518.812.541.163038.923.416.819.112.44280039.823.21618.211.341.8100040.822.315.117.711.643.2125042.52215.317.21145.4160041.319.613.415.811.444.7200040.51913.515.31243.7250039.817.913.115.11243.1315038.61713.914.412.342.5400040.720.513.416.51344.8500038.615.613.314.31342.2630037.613.613.118.61341800038.313.713.716.513.342.61000033.314.614.816.712.938.91250029.513.513.514.412.634.9160002614.714.415.212.131.1SPL51.731.926.82924.655N8.21.60.91.20.610.4median 38.1median 20.3median 15.1median 17.4median 12.6median 41.1Delta4.83.41.51.815.1hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseMedion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
HP Omen Max 16 ah000
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
Noise
1%
-3%
1%
12%
2%
off / environment *
24
24
-0%
22.8
5%
23.8
1%
22.9
5%
24
-0%
Idle Minimum *
25
26
-4%
29
-16%
29
-16%
22.9
8%
24
4%
Idle Average *
27
26
4%
29
-7%
29
-7%
22.9
15%
30.1
-11%
Idle Maximum *
29
26
10%
29
-0%
29
-0%
26.3
9%
30.1
-4%
Load Average *
52
52.4
-1%
47.7
8%
40.5
22%
27.8
47%
41.1
21%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *
55
55.4
-1%
54.8
-0%
53.6
3%
54.2
1%
54.2
1%
Load Maximum *
55
55.4
-1%
61.1
-11%
53.6
3%
53.9
2%
54.2
1%

* ... smaller is better

Temperature

While the Beast 16 X1 remains pleasantly cool in idle mode (maximum 30 °C/86 °F), the casing surfaces can reach up to 49 °C (120.2 °F/top) and 45 °C (113 °F/bottom) under heavier load, which are neither particularly high nor low values compared to the competition.

Max. Load
 46 °C
115 F
49 °C
120 F
43 °C
109 F
 
 46 °C
115 F
46 °C
115 F
39 °C
102 F
 
 37 °C
99 F
35 °C
95 F
32 °C
90 F
 
Maximum: 49 °C = 120 F
Average: 41.4 °C = 107 F
42 °C
108 F
44 °C
111 F
45 °C
113 F
39 °C
102 F
44 °C
111 F
39 °C
102 F
34 °C
93 F
35 °C
95 F
35 °C
95 F
Maximum: 45 °C = 113 F
Average: 39.7 °C = 103 F
Power Supply (max.)  50 °C = 122 F | Room Temperature 21 °C = 70 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 41.4 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 43.3 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.1 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 40.2 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 37 °C / 98.6 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-8.1 °C / -14.6 F).
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
HP Omen Max 16 ah000
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
Heat
2%
6%
-7%
1%
8%
Maximum Upper Side *
49
47.8
2%
42.8
13%
44.2
10%
42.6
13%
39.6
19%
Maximum Bottom *
45
46.7
-4%
50.2
-12%
48.1
-7%
41.2
8%
49.7
-10%
Idle Upper Side *
30
28.4
5%
27.6
8%
33
-10%
32.6
-9%
26.3
12%
Idle Bottom *
30
28.9
4%
26.2
13%
36.1
-20%
32.4
-8%
27.3
9%

* ... smaller is better

Stress test

Our stress test with the FurMark and Prime95 tools was managed acceptably by the CPU and GPU at around 80 °C (176 °F). The temperatures were slightly higher in Cyberpunk 2077 due to the higher clock rates.

Furmark & Prime95
Furmark & Prime95
Furmark & Prime95
Furmark & Prime95
Furmark & Prime95
Furmark & Prime95
Cyberpunk 2077
Cyberpunk 2077
Cyberpunk 2077
Cyberpunk 2077
Cyberpunk 2077
Cyberpunk 2077

Speakers

The sound system of the Beast 16 X1 is surprisingly good by notebook standards and in no way has to hide behind its competitors. Compared to the HP Omen Max 16, the maximum volume is also higher.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2046.539.22534.635.13140.846.14025.428.9503838.86320.734.78015.141.310014.648.91251355.616015.958.920017.760.325016.763.331513.164.840011.969.750012.574.463012.47980011.376.7100011.675.312501175.4160011.472.720001272.525001266.7315012.362.740001371.950001368.863001375.2800013.372.51000012.973.51250012.669.81600012.161.9SPL24.685.3N0.668.2median 12.6median 69.8Delta15.732.929.332.922.625.522.620.519.320.518.918.618.923.421.423.421.828.421.826.818.426.835.51835.545.218.345.256.52156.56020.26063.818.963.864.118.464.165.21865.265.419.765.463.620.663.667.118.967.16917.86967.118.667.164.817.864.867.816.367.864.417.564.46616.2666815.36863.813.463.864.313.364.361.21361.260.512.660.560.312.360.360.411.560.477.92977.944.71.144.7median 64.1median 17.8median 64.13.21.93.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMedion Erazer Beast 16 X1 UltimateHP Omen Max 16 ah000
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

HP Omen Max 16 ah000 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Energy management

Energy consumption

The conclusion regarding energy consumption is ambivalent. While the Beast 16 X1 tends to be more economical than the competition in idle mode, the consumption in 3D mode is slightly above average. Note: The dGPU is automatically activated when an external monitor is connected.

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.4 / 0.8 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 13.1 / 17.5 / 23 Watt
Load midlight 88 / 428 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
HP Omen Max 16 ah000
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
-4%
-17%
-40%
-56%
-1%
-5%
Idle Minimum *
13.1
11.8
10%
9.9
24%
22.5
-72%
28.5
-118%
10.8
18%
Idle Average *
17.5
15.1
14%
28.6
-63%
32.2
-84%
38.8
-122%
17.7
-1%
Idle Maximum *
23
15.8
31%
47.1
-105%
34.3
-49%
45.6
-98%
18.8
18%
Load Average *
88
165.3
-88%
141.8
-61%
169.3
-92%
132.2
-50%
139.4
-58%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *
299
296
1%
253
15%
294
2%
318
-6%
295
1%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor *
297
289
3%
230
23%
288
3%
319
-7%
291
2%
Load Maximum *
428
415.5
3%
233
46%
371.5
13%
384
10%
359.3
16%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Cyberpunk / stress test

0255075100125150175200225250275300325350375400425Tooltip
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø283 (237-428)
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø17.5 (13.1-23)
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø299 (281-315)

Power consumption with external monitor

020406080100120140160180200220240260280300Tooltip
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø93.9 (90.8-98.7)
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø149.4 (95.9-273)
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø219 (215-226)
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø24.9 (19.6-31.5)
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø297 (286-308)

Battery life

Medion provides the 16-inch device with a powerful 99 Wh battery, which led to a runtime of just under 8 hours in our WLAN test (brightness reduced to 150 cd/m²) - a relatively good result that is almost 1:1 with the ROG Strix G16 (90 Wh).

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
7h 54min
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 99 Wh
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 99.8 Wh
HP Omen Max 16 ah000
Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 83 Wh
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 90 Wh
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, 99 Wh
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, 90 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
21%
-26%
-18%
-32%
-1%
-18%
WiFi v1.3
474
572
21%
350
-26%
388
-18%
323
-32%
469
-1%
H.264
460
658
Load
121
71
48
88
Reader / Idle
522
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra 150cd
48

Notebookcheck overall rating

The Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 is a high-quality gaming and creator notebook with a brilliant display and strong performance, but also high noise levels.

Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate - 05/30/2025 v8
Florian Glaser

Chassis
88 / 98 → 90%
Keyboard
89%
Pointing Device
86%
Connectivity
79 / 80 → 98%
Weight
58 / 10-68 → 82%
Battery
79 / 95 → 83%
Display
91%
Games Performance
92%
Application Performance
93%
AI Performance
90%
Temperature
84 / 95 → 88%
Noise
61 / 90 → 67%
Audio
84%
Camera
36 / 75 → 47%
Average
62%
89%
Gaming - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
0%
Packaging
25%
Power Use
75.2%
Repairability
50%
Software Updates
22.3%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 28.8%

Possible alternatives in comparison

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Height
Display
1.
88.5%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX ⎘
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop ⎘
32 GB Memory,  SSD
List Price: 4300 EUR2.8 kg30 mm16.00"
2560x1600
189 PPI
Mini-LED
2.
81.9%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000
HP Omen Max 16 ah000
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX ⎘
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop ⎘
32 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD
Amazon: $2,799.99
List Price: 3800 USD
2.8 kg24.9 mm16.00"
2560x1600
189 PPI
OLED
3.
88.4%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX ⎘
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop ⎘
64 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD
Amazon:
1. $3,249.99
ASUS ROG Strix SCAR 16 (2025...
2. $4,016.99
ASUS ROG Strix SCAR 16 (2025...
3. $2,699.00
ASUS ROG Strix Scar 18 (2025...
List Price: 4999€
2.8 kg30.8 mm16.00"
2560x1600
189 PPI
Mini-LED
4.
87.5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX ⎘
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop ⎘
32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD
Amazon: $3,730.00
List Price: 4200 USD
2.6 kg26.65 mm16.00"
2560x1600
189 PPI
OLED
5.
87.3%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX ⎘
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop ⎘
32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD
Amazon:
1. $1,499.99
ASUS ROG Strix G16 (2025) Ga...
2. $2,380.17
ASUS ROG Strix G16 (2025) Ga...
3. $2,847.22
ASUS ROG Strix G16 (2025) Ga...
List Price: 3299€
2.6 kg30.8 mm16.00"
2560x1600
189 PPI
IPS

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 laptop review: RTX 5090 gamer with optional water cooling
Florian Glaser, 2025-06- 1 (Update: 2025-06- 9)