Notebookcheck Logo
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro

Lenovo Idea Tab Pro review – The large tablet with a pen and long runtimes costs less than $450

Super affordable.

The Lenovo Idea Tab Pro features a large screen and costs less than $450. Creative minds can go wild thanks to its active stylus, gamers can look forward to a high frame rate, and movie fans will be delighted with the tablet's high-resolution display and four speakers. But is there a catch to its low price?
Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by Daisy Dickson) Published 🇩🇪 🇫🇷 ...
Android ARM Tablet

Verdict on the Lenovo Idea Tab Pro

The Lenovo Idea Tab Pro has some minor flaws, such as that its SoC is throttled under load or that its screen isn't the brightest. But as a result of its price of less than $450 and numerous positive aspects, you can overlook this: After all, you get a huge screen, speedy WLAN, pen support, good runtimes, an optional keyboard dock and four speakers with JBL branding and powerful sound.

You can also expand its storage via microSD and make use of satellite navigation, both of which are quite unusual for large tablets. Its software has been adapted to pen input and multitasking and has its own mode for mouse and keyboard control. The tablet's SoC is good enough for lots of activities and enables 60fps gaming—even if its frame rates aren't always totally stable.

Of course, you have to accept its high weight, its update support is limited to less than 4 years and its cameras aren't really good enough for everyday use. Overall, however, Lenovo should be congratulated on a very successful tablet, which has also been given a high-quality case.

The Idea Tab Pro makes the concept of a large tablet including stylus support affordable and, as a result, it should reach lots of people for whom an iPad Pro is far too expensive.

Pros

+ relatively inexpensive
+ good performance values
+ high-quality case
+ input pen
+ fast storage
+ good runtimes
+ 144-Hz- display...
+ ... without PWM
+ powerful speaker sound
+ fast WLAN
+ satellite location services
+ storage can be expanded via microSD

Cons

- display has low maximum brightness
- quite heavy
- SoC is throttled under longer load
- poor camera quality

Price and availability

In the United States, the Lenovo Idea Tab Pro is not yet available to purchase.

Possible alternatives compared

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
82.3%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8300 ⎘
ARM Mali-G615 MP6 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 256 GB 
Amazon:
1. $289.99
Lenovo Tab P12 - Expansive T...
2. $309.04
Lenovo Tab P12-2024 - Expans...
3. $14.95
ProCase 2 Pack Screen Protec...
List Price: 379€
620 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash12.70"
2944x1840
273 PPI
IPS
2.
86.1%
OnePlus Pad 2
OnePlus Pad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 750 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 
Amazon: $563.55
List Price: 549€
584 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash12.10"
3000x2120
304 PPI
IPS
3.
84.8%
Honor MagicPad 2
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 735 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 
Amazon:
1. $13.96
Kepuch 2 Pack Tempered Glass...
2. $11.99
Natbok 2 Pack Compatible wit...
3. $22.98
DWaybox Case for Honor Pad G...
List Price: 600€
555 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash12.30"
3000x1920
290 PPI
OLED
4.
86.4%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 750 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 
Amazon:
1. $309.04
Lenovo Tab P12-2024 - Expans...
2. $290.00
Lenovo Tab Plus - 2024 - Pre...
3. $14.95
ProCase 2 Pack Screen Protec...
List Price: 799€
640 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash12.70"
2944x1840
273 PPI
IPS
5.
78.7%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 710 ⎘
6 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 2.1
Amazon: $339.99
List Price: 380€
571 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash12.10"
2560x1600
249 PPI
IPS

We recently took a closer look at the Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus. The Lenovo Idea Tab Pro, which was presented at the same time, is visiting our test lab today: It is similar to the Yoga Tab Plus in many areas, but is significantly cheaper. This comes at the cost of, for example, a weaker processor and a slimmed-down sound system. However, the Idea Tab Pro also offers advantages over its sister model, such as satellite positioning.

In this test, we want to take a closer look at the limitations that arise as a result of the Idea Tab Pro's super low price, who it is suitable for and whether it can perhaps even compete with more expensive models. Let's get started.

Specifications

Lenovo Idea Tab Pro (IdeaTab Series)
Processor
MediaTek Dimensity 8300 8 x 2.2 - 3.4 GHz, Cortex-A15 / A510
Graphics adapter
Memory
8 GB 
Display
12.70 inch 16:10, 2944 x 1840 pixel 273 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, IPS, glossy: yes, 144 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 256 GB 
, 210 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: audio via USB, Card Reader: microSD, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: hall, color, acceleration, compass
Networking
Wi-Fi 6E (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 6.9 x 291.8 x 189.1 ( = 0.27 x 11.49 x 7.44 in)
Battery
10200 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 45 Watt charging
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 14
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix LED flash
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: four speakers, USB-C cable, microSD tray pin, 12 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
620 g ( = 21.87 oz / 1.37 pounds) ( = 0 oz / 0 pounds)
Price
379 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Case – Good-weather tablet

The Lenovo Idea Tab Pro is housed in a metal unibody case and is available in two color variants: Either in light green or dark gray. The camera module is slightly set off by a glass cover, but only protrudes very little from the case overall. Its dimensions are slightly larger than the Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus, but the Idea Tab Pro is 20 grams lighter. However, at 620 grams, it still weighs quite a bit.

Its build quality is great and only very strong pressure becomes visible in the liquid crystal of the screen. Although the device creaks quietly when you twist it, it's generally very stable. The material transitions are also very clean and can hardly be felt.

It doesn't have an IP certification, so you should be aware as not to expose the device to excessively adverse environmental conditions.

Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro

Size comparison

291.8 mm / 11.5 in 189.1 mm / 7.44 in 6.9 mm / 0.2717 in 620 g1.367 lbs290.9 mm / 11.5 in 188.3 mm / 7.41 in 6.69 mm / 0.2634 in 640 g1.411 lbs280 mm / 11 in 181.85 mm / 7.16 in 7.52 mm / 0.2961 in 571 g1.259 lbs274.5 mm / 10.8 in 180.5 mm / 7.11 in 5.8 mm / 0.2283 in 555 g1.224 lbs268.7 mm / 10.6 in 195 mm / 7.68 in 6.49 mm / 0.2555 in 584 g1.287 lbs297 mm / 11.7 in 210 mm / 8.27 in 1 mm / 0.03937 in 5.7 g0.01257 lbs

Connectivity – Confusing variety

Things get a little complicated when it comes to the available configurations: In addition to the two colors, there are models with 8 GB RAM and 12 GB RAM, 128 GB or 256 GB mass storage, and the website also mentions an optional matte display, which is not (yet) available. There are also configuration packages with a stylus and folio. The SoC would also theoretically allow a model with cellular support.

We found the following models at the time of testing:

  • Lenovo Idea Tab Pro 8 GB RAM / 128 GB storage / WiFi / incl. pen: approx. $390
  • Lenovo Idea Tab Pro 8 GB RAM / 256 GB storage / WiFi / incl. pen: approx. $415
  • Lenovo Idea Tab Pro 8 GB RAM / 128 GB storage / WiFi / incl. pen & folio: approx. $425
  • Lenovo Idea Tab Pro 8 GB RAM / 256 GB storage / WiFi / incl. pen & folio: approx. $445
  • Lenovo Idea Tab Pro 12 GB RAM / 256 GB storage / WiFi / without accessories: approx. $360

Unfortunately, lots of offers on the internet make it difficult to see which accessories are included in its scope of delivery, so you should ask the retailer if you're in any doubt.

We tested the model with 8GB LPDDR5 RAM and 256 GB UFS 4.0 storage. The models with 128 GB only use slightly slower UFS 3.1 flash.

In all cases, the USB port is connected internally in accordance with USB 3.1 Gen 1, meaning it can transfer data at up to 5 GBit/s. Wired image transmission to an external monitor is also possible using the Display Port standard.

A keyboard dock can be connected via pogo pins on the underside.

microSD card reader

The tablet's storage can also be expanded via a microSD card. The card reader proved to be of average speed during our tests using the Angelbird V60 as a reference microSD card.

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (Angelbird V60)
42.3 MB/s +6%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8300 (Angelbird V60)
39.9 MB/s
Average of class Tablet
  (7.61 - 101.6, n=58, last 2 years)
35.3 MB/s -12%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø38.5 (30.5-48.8)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø38.4 (30.1-48.6)
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø72.2 (43.4-78.5)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø78.3 (24.3-88.6)

Software – Customizable and with 4 years of updates

Lenovo ZUI is very well adapted to the tablet's large screen, for example, it can display several apps simultaneously in windows and automatically switches to a mode optimized for this control when a mouse and keyboard are connected. A mostly visible taskbar makes it easier to launch frequently used apps, even if you're not on the home screen. However, not all apps are optimized for this and control elements are covered up in some programs.

The software on our test device is based on Android 14. Security updates will be supplied until September 2028, which was just under 3 1/2 years at the time of testing. New Android versions will be available until Android 17. We complained about this with the Yoga Tab Plus, which has a similar update period. In terms of sustainability, a longer supply would also be desirable for the Idea Tab Pro, but it is significantly cheaper, making the update supply period more acceptable in this case.

Some pre-installed sponsored apps are to be expected, but these can be easily deleted.

Software Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
Software Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
Software Lenovo Idea Tab Pro

Sustainability

The Lenovo tablet comes in colorful printed packaging that doesn't use any plastic. However, we couldn't find more detailed information about the materials used or the Idea Tab Pro's carbon footprint.

There is a spare parts search on Lenovo's website, where the Idea Tab Pro is also listed, but there are currently no parts available to buy. We couldn't find any service manuals for self-repair.

Communication and GNSS – Even with satellite navigation

The Lenovo Idea Tab Pro comes with WiFi 6E as its fastest Wi-Fi standard, which means it can also use the less crowded 6 GHz band.

The speed advantage is considerable: We measured up to 1,780 MBit/s with WiFi 6E, while it only managed around 1,000 MBit/s in the 5 GHz band. This means that you can even fully take advantage of a gigabit internet line at home; only those who have their own fiber optic line or work a lot in internal networks could benefit from even higher speeds with WiFi 7 on other tablets.

During our test, its WiFi signal was fully available close to the router and even large websites loaded quickly. At a distance of 10 meters from the access point and through 3 walls, the signal strength was only half as strong and pages loaded somewhat delayed.

A cellular version of the tablet is not currently offered, but would theoretically be possible with the chipset.

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Average Wi-Fi 6E
  (227 - 1810, n=56)
956 MBit/s +29%
Honor MagicPad 2
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
867 (453min - 934max) MBit/s +17%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
Wi-Fi 6E
740 (571min, 575.93P1 - 868max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
528 (438min - 633max) MBit/s -29%
Average of class Tablet
  (10.5 - 1463, n=81, last 2 years)
519 MBit/s -30%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
1596 (1524min - 1625max) MBit/s +68%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
Wi-Fi 6E
949 (754min, 758.35P1 - 1070max) MBit/s
Average Wi-Fi 6E
  (442 - 1787, n=56)
947 MBit/s 0%
Honor MagicPad 2
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
937 (892min - 952max) MBit/s -1%
Average of class Tablet
  (20.1 - 1705, n=81, last 2 years)
507 MBit/s -47%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
Wi-Fi 6E
1623 (1396min, 1418.33P1 - 1740max) MBit/s
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
1598 (1108min, 1152.08P1 - 1731max) MBit/s -2%
Average Wi-Fi 6E
  (229 - 1845, n=58)
1435 MBit/s -12%
Average of class Tablet
  (691 - 1888, n=15, last 2 years)
1383 MBit/s -15%
OnePlus Pad 2
Wi-Fi 7
895 (675min - 1017max) MBit/s -45%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
Wi-Fi 6E
1698 (1105min, 1186.78P1 - 1780max) MBit/s
OnePlus Pad 2
Wi-Fi 7
1652 (1472min - 1703max) MBit/s -3%
Average of class Tablet
  (666 - 1842, n=17, last 2 years)
1361 MBit/s -20%
Average Wi-Fi 6E
  (598 - 1844, n=58)
1345 MBit/s -21%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
960 (700min, 702.32P1 - 1188max) MBit/s -43%
0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000105011001150120012501300135014001450150015501600165017001750Tooltip
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz: Ø1623 (1396-1740)
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz: Ø1698 (1105-1780)
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø740 (571-868)
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø949 (754-1070)
GPS test outside
GPS test outside
Available satellite networks
Available satellite networks

Although our test device is a WLAN tablet, it still supports satellite positioning. However, if you step outside, it takes a while to reach a usable level of accuracy and not too many satellites are accessed. Even so, the major global satellite networks are supported, even SBAS for even greater accuracy.

Of course, we also wanted to see how the tablet could perform in practice and set off on a bike ride, taking the Garmin Venu 2 smartwatch with us as a comparison device.

Overall, we liked the Idea Tab Pro's recorded route. It wasn't always one hundred percent accurate and sometimes appears to lead through buildings but all-in-all, we can say it's sufficient for navigation. Only those who value absolute precision should reach for a different device.

To be fair, it has to be said that the otherwise quite accurate Garmin smartwatch also had problems, so there may have been general interference with satellite reception on the test day.

Lenovo Idea Tab Pro location services – overview
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro location services – overview
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro location services – turning point
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro location services – turning point
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro location services – bridge
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro location services – bridge
Garmin Venu 2 location services – overview
Garmin Venu 2 location services – overview
Garmin Venu 2 location services – turning point
Garmin Venu 2 location services – turning point
Garmin Venu 2 location services – bridge
Garmin Venu 2 location services – bridge

Cameras – More for emergencies

Photo taken using front camera
Photo taken using front camera

Cameras are much less important on such a large tablet than on a smartphone, but Lenovo has still installed one lens on the front and one on the back. They can be used for video calls, scanning QR codes or documenting a situation.

There is a 13-megapixel camera on the back of the case, which takes decent pictures in good lighting conditions. However, bright areas tend to look overexposed. The image sharpness is average. In very low light and high contrast, some detail was lost in the bright candle flame. Its exposure is fine, but some image sharpness is lost.

Videos can be recorded in 4K at 30fps, but the autofocus is inaccurate and occasionally requires the user's assistance.

The front camera takes decent selfies, but bright areas again look very overexposed. You should make sure that the background isn't too bright during video conferences.

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera plantMain camera surroundingsMain camera low light

In our lab with very good lighting, the main camera showed only moderate sharpness and problems when displaying fine text, especially in front of the color red. At 1 lux of light, the test chart was still minimally recognizable.

ColorChecker
10.6 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
14.7 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
12 ∆E
7 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
1.9 ∆E
8 ∆E
ColorChecker Lenovo Idea Tab Pro: 8.96 ∆E min: 1.93 - max: 14.68 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.6 ∆E
54.3 ∆E
39.4 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
45.2 ∆E
61.5 ∆E
53.3 ∆E
35.7 ∆E
43.2 ∆E
29 ∆E
64.7 ∆E
63.9 ∆E
31.5 ∆E
47.7 ∆E
37.3 ∆E
75.6 ∆E
44.6 ∆E
42 ∆E
88.4 ∆E
70.2 ∆E
52 ∆E
36.9 ∆E
23.8 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Lenovo Idea Tab Pro: 46.59 ∆E min: 13.35 - max: 88.41 ∆E

Accessories and warranty – Lots available

Our Lenovo Idea Tab Pro comes with a stylus, as well as a USB cable and a tool for opening the microSD slot. The pen costs around $60 individually from the manufacturer, while the folio case without a keyboard costs around $30. The keyboard folio is not currently available from Lenovo, but can be purchased from online retailers for around $80.

You'll have to make do with a 12-month warranty.

Input devices & operation – The Idea Tab Pro with a fingerprint sensor

The display can handle a frame rate of up to 144 Hz, making touch inputs visible very quickly. This results in a very immediate feeling when you type on the tablet. The touchscreen is also very precise and sensitive right up to the corners and edges.

The standby button is located on the left-hand side of the case, with an integrated fingerprint sensor that can be used to unlock the device and sensitive apps such as banking applications. It reacts very quickly and reliably to fingerprints, and it unlocks the tablet with almost no waiting time. Facial recognition is not available.

The stylus included with our test device is the Tab Pen Plus. In contrast to the Tab Pen Pro, which is included with the Yoga Tab Plus, there are some limitations: For example, the pen has to be charged via a USB cable. Although it can be attached magnetically to the back of the tablet, it isn't powered from there. The Pen Plus also offers no resistance when writing and no touch-sensitive surface for inputs—just a button.

Nevertheless, you can still write and draw very precisely on the Tab Pen Plus, as it features 4,096 pressure and tilt levels. The pen is very comfortable to hold, so even longer drawing sessions are no problem.

Keyboard horizontal
Keyboard horizontal
Keyboard upright
Keyboard upright

Display – Not quite so bright IPS screen

Sub-pixel array
Sub-pixel array

The tablet's display shows that Lenovo had to make savings somewhere. Although the IPS panel has a competitive resolution of 2,944 x 1,840 pixels, you'll have to live with a maximum brightness of around 400 cd/m². This makes it impossible to display HDR content adequately.

Its color accuracy also leaves more to be desired, and we detected a slight yellowish cast in the grayscale.

365
cd/m²
401
cd/m²
384
cd/m²
385
cd/m²
409
cd/m²
387
cd/m²
397
cd/m²
385
cd/m²
376
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 409 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 387.7 cd/m² Minimum: 1.94 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 409 cd/m²
Contrast: 1023:1 (Black: 0.4 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.46 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.89
ΔE Greyscale 5.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
98.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.106
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
IPS, 2944x1840, 12.7"
OnePlus Pad 2
IPS, 3000x2120, 12.1"
Honor MagicPad 2
OLED, 3000x1920, 12.3"
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
IPS, 2944x1840, 12.7"
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
IPS, 2560x1600, 12.1"
Screen
48%
55%
22%
9%
Brightness middle
409
833
104%
645
58%
726
78%
513
25%
Brightness
388
771
99%
650
68%
691
78%
480
24%
Brightness Distribution
89
84
-6%
94
6%
91
2%
86
-3%
Black Level *
0.4
0.45
-13%
0.55
-38%
0.4
-0%
Contrast
1023
1851
81%
1320
29%
1283
25%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.46
1.79
48%
1.3
62%
4.67
-35%
2.82
18%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
5.46
4.01
27%
2.1
62%
5.6
-3%
8.83
-62%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
5.2
3
42%
1.5
71%
1.8
65%
2.9
44%
Gamma
2.106 104%
2.254 98%
2.25 98%
2.249 98%
2.265 97%
CCT
5823 112%
6419 101%
6658 98%
6382 102%
7189 90%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8580 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

We didn't note any PWM flickering, but gamers will have to reckon with slightly slower response times than with OLED displays, for example.

CalMAN grayscale
CalMAN grayscale
CalMAN color accuracy
CalMAN color accuracy
CalMAN saturation
CalMAN saturation
CalMAN sRGB color space
CalMAN sRGB color space
CalMAN AdobeRGB color space
CalMAN AdobeRGB color space
CalMAN DCI P3 color space
CalMAN DCI P3 color space

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
20.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 15.3 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 42 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.8 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
37.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 32.5 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 51 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.6 ms).

Outdoors, it is difficult to see content on the device's display, even on cloudy days at the maximum brightness level: Reflections on its glossy screen are simply too strong.

Its viewing angles, on the other hand, are excellent: Even from very flat viewing angles, the screen's content is easy to see without any color changes.

Outdoor use
Outdoor use
Viewing angles
Viewing angles

Performance – Top-class performance for little money

Lenovo has gone for a MediaTek Dimensity 8300 as the Idea Tab Pro's SoC. This places the tablet in the upper class in terms of performance, meaning it cannot quite keep up with real high-end tablets in this respect. As a result, it isn't surprising that the Honor MagicPad 2 and the Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus came ahead in most processor and system benchmarks.

A separate NPU is available for AI calculations, and it seems to do its job very quickly: Our test device usually took the lead in the AI benchmarks.

Geekbench 6.4
Single-Core
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
2213 Points +54%
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1986 Points +38%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8300, Mali-G615 MP6, 8192
1440 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300
  (n=1)
1440 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet
  (185 - 3715, n=76, last 2 years)
1085 Points -25%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 6144
1007 Points -30%
OnePlus Pad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
954 Points -34%
Multi-Core
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
6723 Points +44%
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
5166 Points +11%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8300, Mali-G615 MP6, 8192
4674 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300
  (n=1)
4674 Points 0%
OnePlus Pad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
4564 Points -2%
Average of class Tablet
  (493 - 14690, n=76, last 2 years)
3466 Points -26%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 6144
2616 Points -44%
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1644 Points +54%
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1447 Points +36%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8300, Mali-G615 MP6, 8192
1065 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300
  (n=1)
1065 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 6144
774 Points -27%
Average of class Tablet
  (103 - 1887, n=70, last 2 years)
712 Points -33%
Multi-Core
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
5924 Points +48%
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
4460 Points +11%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8300, Mali-G615 MP6, 8192
4009 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300
  (n=1)
4009 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 6144
2744 Points -32%
Average of class Tablet
  (303 - 8624, n=70, last 2 years)
2534 Points -37%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1891925 Points +53%
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1432569 Points +16%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8300, Mali-G615 MP6, 8192
1234789 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300
  (n=1)
1234789 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet
  (164396 - 2716980, n=43, last 2 years)
772514 Points -37%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 6144
612145 Points -50%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8300, Mali-G615 MP6, 8192
20813 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300
  (n=1)
20813 Points 0%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
17967 Points -14%
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
17329 Points -17%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 6144
12802 Points -38%
OnePlus Pad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
12156 Points -42%
Average of class Tablet
  (3195 - 20841, n=72, last 2 years)
10152 Points -51%
CrossMark - Overall
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1431 Points +35%
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1155 Points +9%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8300, Mali-G615 MP6, 8192
1062 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300
  (n=1)
1062 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet
  (172 - 1944, n=62, last 2 years)
786 Points -26%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 6144
747 Points -30%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
10498 Points +38%
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
9147 Points +21%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8300, Mali-G615 MP6, 8192
7584 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300
  (n=1)
7584 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet
  (195 - 11721, n=57, last 2 years)
4360 Points -43%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 6144
4151 Points -45%
System
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
14858 Points +60%
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
13141 Points +42%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 6144
9324 Points 0%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8300, Mali-G615 MP6, 8192
9280 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300
  (n=1)
9280 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet
  (904 - 16435, n=57, last 2 years)
7371 Points -21%
Memory
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
11834 Points +38%
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
10977 Points +28%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8300, Mali-G615 MP6, 8192
8586 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300
  (n=1)
8586 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet
  (401 - 12938, n=57, last 2 years)
5080 Points -41%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 6144
3222 Points -62%
Graphics
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
33602 Points +37%
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
25642 Points +5%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8300, Mali-G615 MP6, 8192
24475 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300
  (n=1)
24475 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet
  (418 - 57192, n=57, last 2 years)
9799 Points -60%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 6144
4622 Points -81%
Web
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
2056 Points +21%
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1893 Points +12%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8300, Mali-G615 MP6, 8192
1696 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300
  (n=1)
1696 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 6144
1297 Points -24%
Average of class Tablet
  (10 - 2056, n=57, last 2 years)
1292 Points -24%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8300, Mali-G615 MP6, 8192
55840 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300
  (n=1)
55840 Points 0%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
17975 Points -68%
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
13900 Points -75%
Average of class Tablet
  (2597 - 74821, n=55, last 2 years)
11205 Points -80%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 6144
7223 Points -87%
Geekbench AI
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8300, Mali-G615 MP6, 8192
1110 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300
  (n=1)
1110 Points 0%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
480 Points -57%
Average of class Tablet
  (85 - 1110, n=7, last 2 years)
355 Points -68%
Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8300, Mali-G615 MP6, 8192
4279 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300
  (n=1)
4279 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet
  (84 - 4279, n=7, last 2 years)
808 Points -81%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
480 Points -89%
Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8300, Mali-G615 MP6, 8192
4200 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300
  (n=1)
4200 Points 0%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1108 Points -74%
Average of class Tablet
  (130 - 4200, n=7, last 2 years)
1014 Points -76%
AI Benchmark
Score V5
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
8305 Points
Average of class Tablet
  (101 - 8305, n=5, last 2 years)
2472 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 6144
456 Points
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
120 Points
Score V6
Average of class Tablet
  (99.7 - 7341, n=6, last 2 years)
2096 Points +121%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8300, Mali-G615 MP6, 8192
948 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300
  (n=1)
948 Points 0%

During the graphics calculations, our test device was again in the midfield among the comparison devices. Its frame rates were too low for 4K resolutions, but the demanding GFXBench still resulted in around 30fps at 1440p. Since the display's native resolution is between these two values, you should choose a slightly lower resolution if possible to guarantee smooth gaming.

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4514 Points +81%
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4454 Points +78%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3218 Points +29%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2497 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
779 Points -69%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4742 Points +77%
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4485 Points +68%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3301 Points +23%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2677 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
789 Points -71%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
12985 Points +623%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2998 Points +67%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1796 Points
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8911 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2954 Points -67%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points -100%
3DMark / Solar Bay Score
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8315 Points +98%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5468 Points +30%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4769 Points +13%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4203 Points
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8321 Points +112%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5458 Points +39%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4808 Points +23%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3921 Points
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8796 Points
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1626 Points -82%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1071 Points -88%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
935 Points -89%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1639 Points +54%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1090 Points +2%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1067 Points
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
948 Points -11%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
143 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
79 fps -45%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -58%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -58%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
520 fps +65%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
498 fps +58%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
316 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
122 fps -61%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
88 fps
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -32%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -32%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
42 fps -52%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
325 fps +84%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
265 fps +50%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
177 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
72 fps -59%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps +9%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59 fps +7%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
55 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
29 fps -47%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
240 fps +95%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
200 fps +63%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
123 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
53 fps -57%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
59 fps +74%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
42 fps +24%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
34 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps -56%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
137 fps +88%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
110 fps +51%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
73 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
29 fps -60%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
54 fps +93%
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
42 fps +50%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
35 fps +25%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
28 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
11 fps -61%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
69 fps +109%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
67 fps +103%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
55 fps +67%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
33 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
13 fps -61%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps +62%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
53 fps +43%
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
50 fps +35%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
37 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
18 fps -51%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
170 fps +107%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
167 fps +104%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
144 fps +76%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
82 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
34 fps -59%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
32 fps +113%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
30 fps +100%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
24 fps +60%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
15 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.9 fps -61%

The Lenovo Idea Tab Pro is fast when surfing the web and managed to outperform lots of comparable devices during our test. Even large websites load quite quickly, you only have to wait a little while for the images to load when scrolling quickly.

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus (Chrome 132)
231.7 Points +68%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro (Chrome 132)
137.835 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300 (n=1)
137.8 Points 0%
Honor MagicPad 2 (Chrome 128.0.6613.146)
134.356 Points -3%
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 334, n=67, last 2 years)
117.8 Points -15%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro (Chrome 128)
116.621 Points -15%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus (Chrome 132)
294 runs/min +58%
Honor MagicPad 2 (Chrome 128.0.6613.146)
197 runs/min +6%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro (Chrome 132)
186 runs/min
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300 (n=1)
186 runs/min 0%
Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 572, n=59, last 2 years)
133.5 runs/min -28%
Speedometer 3.0 - Score
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus (Chrome 132)
17.2 runs/min +58%
Average of class Tablet (1.25 - 33.7, n=33, last 2 years)
12 runs/min +10%
Honor MagicPad 2 (Chrome 128.0.6613.146)
11.9 runs/min +9%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro (Chrome 132)
10.9 runs/min
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300 (n=1)
10.9 runs/min 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro (Chrome 128)
6.72 runs/min -38%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus (Chrome 132)
164 Points +14%
Honor MagicPad 2 (Chrome 128.0.6613.146)
155 Points +8%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro (Chrome 132)
144 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300 (n=1)
144 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet (21 - 315, n=66, last 2 years)
112.2 Points -22%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro (Chrome 128)
112 Points -22%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus (Chrome 132)
70252 Points +54%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro (Chrome 132)
45579 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300 (n=1)
45579 Points 0%
OnePlus Pad 2 (Chrome 128)
45083 Points -1%
Honor MagicPad 2 (Chrome 128.0.6613.146)
42032 Points -8%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro (Chrome 128)
34923 Points -23%
Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=86, last 2 years)
30093 Points -34%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=73, last 2 years)
3702 ms * -309%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro (Chrome 128)
1151.6 ms * -27%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro (Chrome 132)
904.3 ms *
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300 (n=1)
904 ms * -0%
Honor MagicPad 2 (Chrome 128.0.6613.146)
842.2 ms * +7%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus (Chrome 132)
579.9 ms * +36%

* ... smaller is better

Our test device with 256 GB of storage comes with UFS 4.0 flash, so it's super fast when transferring data and it noticeably shortens loading times when running complex apps.

Lenovo Idea Tab ProOnePlus Pad 2Honor MagicPad 2Lenovo Yoga Tab PlusXiaomi Redmi Pad ProAverage 256 GB UFS 4.0 FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
-48%
-40%
-27%
-69%
-18%
-69%
Sequential Read 256KB
3648.3
2003.1
-45%
2025.54
-44%
3868
6%
844.9
-77%
Sequential Write 256KB
3298.5
1732.7
-47%
2003.53
-39%
3047.6
-8%
705.3
-79%
2665 ?(555 - 3361, n=32)
-19%
Random Read 4KB
474.4
236.5
-50%
298.27
-37%
241.2
-49%
215.5
-55%
392 ?(218 - 483, n=32)
-17%
Random Write 4KB
668
348.6
-48%
401.95
-40%
290.9
-56%
231.4
-65%

Games – Even 60 fps are possible

The tablet's large display is both a blessing and a curse for ambitious gamers: On the one hand, its high resolution and large diagonal make gaming an experience; on the other hand, the controls on the screen are very large but sometimes difficult to reach when holding the tablet in your hands. The device is also quite heavy for longer gaming sessions.

Its frame rates often reach 60 fps, but sometimes with significant drops—such as during Genshin Impact—so you can't always rely on a smooth game. Even when playing PUBG Mobile, 60 fps isn't always guaranteed at low settings. At high settings, only 40 fps are available, anyway.

We measured the frame rates using the GameBench software.

Genshin Impact
Genshin Impact
PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps: Ø58.7 (47-61)
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps: Ø55.4 (9-61)
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø57.2 (34-64)
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø39.4 (35-41)
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro; Diablo Immortal; Medium Mobile Low: Ø58.2 (39-60)
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro; Diablo Immortal; Ultra Mobile Very High: Ø59 (49-60)

Emissions – SoC is throttled

Temperature

The large surface area of the tablet allows the heat generated by the SoC while working to be dissipated well. We measured a maximum temperature of 34.3 °C on the tablet's case after prolonged use. Although this is noticeable, it is by no means problematic.

However, as we learned from the 3DMark stress tests, the SoC's performance isn't completely maintained after prolonged load; instead, it drops by up to 20%.

Max. Load
 30.1 °C
86 F
34.3 °C
94 F
27.3 °C
81 F
 
 28.5 °C
83 F
29.2 °C
85 F
27 °C
81 F
 
 29.1 °C
84 F
28.8 °C
84 F
27.9 °C
82 F
 
Maximum: 34.3 °C = 94 F
Average: 29.1 °C = 84 F
27.4 °C
81 F
33.5 °C
92 F
30.5 °C
87 F
26.7 °C
80 F
29.4 °C
85 F
30.2 °C
86 F
27.5 °C
82 F
28.6 °C
83 F
28.6 °C
83 F
Maximum: 33.5 °C = 92 F
Average: 29.2 °C = 85 F
Power Supply (max.)  39.9 °C = 104 F | Room Temperature 19 °C = 66 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 29.1 °C / 84 F, compared to the average of 29.9 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.3 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.5 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.1 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 29.9 °C / 86 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad stress test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
99.7 % +25%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.6 % +25%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
79.6 %
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
77 % -3%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
73.6 % -8%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.1 % +19%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
89.3 % +7%
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
83.8 % 0%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
83.4 %
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
81.8 % -2%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
93.7 % +2%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
92.3 %
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
91.3 % -1%
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
86.9 % -6%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
95.9 % +19%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
86.6 % +8%
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
86.5 % +8%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
80.3 %
05101520253035404550556065707580859095Tooltip
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø11.5 (11.1-13.4)
OnePlus Pad 2 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø24.1 (22.9-27.4)
Honor MagicPad 2 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø18.1 (17.6-19.7)
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø23.7 (22.2-27.1)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø4.69 (4.65-4.7)
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø40.2 (38-47.8)
OnePlus Pad 2 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø78.9 (74-96)
Honor MagicPad 2 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø64.5 (53.4-72.6)
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø60.4 (60.3-60.5)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø17.7 (17.7-17.7)
Honor MagicPad 2 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø71.7 (69.5-77.2)
Honor MagicPad 2 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø16.7 (16.4-17.5)
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø11 (10.7-11.6)
OnePlus Pad 2 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø23.2 (22.2-25.5)
Honor MagicPad 2 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø16.7 (16.4-17.5)
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø22.7 (22.1-24.2)
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø6.7 (6.29-7.83)
OnePlus Pad 2 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø11.1 (10.6-12.3)
Honor MagicPad 2 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.0.15: Ø7.85 (7.73-8.06)
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø10.8 (10.4-12.1)
Heatmap front
Heatmap front
Heatmap back
Heatmap back

Speakers

Available Bluetooth audio codecs
Available Bluetooth audio codecs

The large productivity and entertainment tablet comes with four speakers. These are located on the sides of the shorter edges of the tablet, so you'll get a slight stereo effect in landscape mode. Their maximum volume is easily sufficient to fill a medium-sized room with sound.

The sound is very full at maximum volume and some low frequencies can be heard. The treble is then slightly overemphasized, but if you lower the volume a little, the sound becomes even rounder. Overall, you can have a lot of fun with the built-in speakers and the speakers are also well suited for video sound in a small conference room.

External speakers or headphones can be connected via USB-C or Bluetooth. The most important wireless codecs are available, including LDAC, AAC and aptX HD.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2044.248.12538.739.13137.7344038.935.95037.235.96325.529.78019.534.610018.744.712520.452.216018.856.220018.162.225015.665.931515.769.740014.763.850016.266.763020.173.280019.176.2100018.378.1125015.378.1160013.571.4200013.668.8250012.769.531501371.1400012.476500012.573.3630012.370.8800012.571.41000012.5711250012.4611600011.866.9SPL27.185.6N0.968.2median 14.7median 69.7Delta2.64.234.838.434.737.924.629.626.528.32934.23127.517.525.116.931.11836.421.239.921.645.62253.923.557.616.456.917.562.717.565.416.372.115.376.112.876.111.271.811.265.611.867.412.264.412.766.813.167.713.660.814.558.115.263.415.966.216.754.426.8820.948.8median 15.9median 63.436.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseLenovo Idea Tab ProXiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 50% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Battery life – Giant tablet with endurance

Power consumption

The Lenovo Idea Tab Pro actually needs very little power in idle mode and its maximum consumption is also moderate. However, the latter is not surprising given the SoC's somewhat lower performance level.

You can charge the tablet at a maximum of 45 watts. It can take up to 2:20 hours to fully charge its large battery.

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.2 / 1.8 / 2.8 Watt
Load midlight 7.9 / 10.8 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
10200 mAh
Honor MagicPad 2
10050 mAh
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
10200 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
10000 mAh
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300
 
Average of class Tablet
 
Power Consumption
-128%
-24%
-14%
0%
-52%
Idle Minimum *
1.2
3.6
-200%
1.5
-25%
1.7
-42%
1.2 ?(n=1)
-0%
Idle Average *
1.8
6.52
-262%
1.8
-0%
2.2
-22%
1.8 ?(n=1)
-0%
Idle Maximum *
2.8
6.54
-134%
2.3
18%
2.9
-4%
2.8 ?(n=1)
-0%
Load Average *
7.9
10.63
-35%
11.1
-41%
5.8
27%
7.9 ?(n=1)
-0%
Load Maximum *
10.8
11.57
-7%
18.5
-71%
13.9
-29%
10.8 ?(n=1)
-0%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910Tooltip
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.55 (2.2-10.8)
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.247 (1.157-2.78)

Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910Tooltip
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø10.7 (10.5-10.8)
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.247 (1.157-2.78)

Runtimes

At 10,200 mAh, the Idea Tab Pro's battery has a slightly higher capacity than lots of comparable devices, and our test device boasts good runtimes. However, a Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro and a OnePlus Pad 2 have even more endurance.

13:18 hours when surfing using Wi-Fi should be enough to get through a day on the couch or at your desk using the Idea Tab Pro without needing to reach for a power cable. When watching movies without an internet connection, it can even last almost 17 hours, which should be enough to watch a season of your favorite series without charging.

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
25h 23min
WiFi Websurfing
13h 18min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
16h 58min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 16min
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
10200 mAh
OnePlus Pad 2
9510 mAh
Honor MagicPad 2
10050 mAh
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
10200 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
10000 mAh
Battery Runtime
9%
-13%
-7%
16%
Reader / Idle
1523
1469
-4%
1422
-7%
2236
47%
H.264
1018
880
-14%
998
-2%
1052
3%
WiFi v1.3
798
866
9%
606
-24%
768
-4%
924
16%
Load
256
232
-9%
219
-14%
245
-4%

Notebookcheck total rating

Lenovo Idea Tab Pro review. Test device provided by Lenovo Germany.
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro review. Test device provided by Lenovo Germany.

The Lenovo Idea Tab Pro offers sufficient performance for everyday use, long runtimes, great speakers, a large flicker-free display and even a satellite positioning function. All this is available for less than $450.

So, if you are looking for an affordable, large tablet with pen support and Android optimized for productivity, this tablet is highly recommended.

Lenovo Idea Tab Pro - 02/11/2025 v8
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
86 / 98 → 88%
Keyboard
77 / 80 → 97%
Pointing Device
94%
Connectivity
49 / 69 → 71%
Weight
81 / 40-88 → 86%
Battery
89%
Display
78%
Games Performance
24 / 65 → 37%
Application Performance
70 / 92 → 76%
AI Performance
50%
Temperature
94%
Noise
100%
Audio
89 / 91 → 97%
Camera
53 / 90 → 59%
Average
64%
82%
Tablet - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
10%
Packaging
85%
Power Use
95.7%
Repairability
11%
Software Updates
56.7%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 43.1%

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Read all 1 comments / answer
static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > Lenovo Idea Tab Pro review – The large tablet with a pen and long runtimes costs less than $450
Florian Schmitt, 2025-02-13 (Update: 2025-02-13)