, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

ARM Mali-T720 vs ARM Mali-T760 MP8

ARM Mali-T720

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-T720

The ARM Mali-T720 is a mobile graphics solution that can be found in ARM SoCs. The chip is available since 2014. Besides OpenGL ES 3.1, the GPU supports OpenCL 1.1 as well as DirectX 11 FL9_3. According to ARM, the Mali-T720 can be scaled from 1 - 8 cores/clusters (MP1, MP2, ... MP) and clocks up to 650 MHz.

Sometimes the SoC does not specifies the number of cores, therefore this generic page / GPU for the single cluster variant is used and the benchmarks may differ. See e.g. the Mali-T720 MP2 and T720 MP4 pages for comparison.

The MP1 variant is only as fast as the older Mali-400 MP4 graphics card and therefore only suited for low demanding 3D games (Android based). However, the power consumption on the other hand is rather low and therefore the GPU is also suited for small smartphones.

ARM Mali-T760 MP8

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-T760 MP8

The ARM Mali-T760 MP8 is a fast mobile graphics solution that can be found in ARM SoCs like the Samsung Exynos 7420 Octa (Galaxy S6). The chip is available since Q1/2015 and is one of the fastest solutions of its class at the time of the introduction. Besides OpenGL ES 3.1, the GPU supports OpenCL 1.1 as well as DirectX 11. According to ARM, the Mali-T760 can be scaled from 1 - 16 cores/clusters.

The MP8 version offers 8 clusters clocked at up to 772 MHz (302 GFLOPS). In most benchmarks, the GPU is able to beat the competing Adreno 420 (Snapdragon 805) and PowerVR GX6450 (Apple A8). Only a few tablet chips like Tegra K1/X1 or the GXA6850 (Apple A8X) are still somewhat faster. Overall, the Mali-T760 MP8 is the fastest smartphone GPU in early 2015 and will handle even the most demanding Android games fluently in high resolutions.

Despite its impressive performance, the Mali-T760 MP8 / Exynos 7420 has a very modest power consumption thanks to an advanced 14 nm FinFET process (Samsung LPE). Therefore, it can be used even in smaller smartphones.

ARM Mali-T720ARM Mali-T760 MP8
ManufacturerARMARM
Mali-T700 Series
Mali-T760 MP8 8 @ 0.7 - 0.77 GHz
Mali-T760 MP6 compare 6 @ 0.7 GHz
Mali-T760 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.6 GHz
Mali-T760 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.7 GHz
Mali-T720 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.6 GHz
Mali-T720 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.65 GHz
Mali-T720 1 @ 0.6 GHz
Mali-T760 MP8 8 @ 0.7 - 0.77 GHz
Mali-T760 MP6 compare 6 @ 0.7 GHz
Mali-T760 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.6 GHz
Mali-T760 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.7 GHz
Mali-T720 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.6 GHz
Mali-T720 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.65 GHz
Mali-T720 1 @ 0.6 GHz
CodenameMidgard (3rd Generation)Midgard (3rd Generation)
ArchitectureMidgard (3rd-gen)Midgard (3rd-gen)
Pipelines1 - unified8 - unified
Core Speed600 MHz700 - 772 (Boost) MHz
Shared Memorynono
DirectXDirectX 9.3DirectX 11
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.1, OpenCL 1.1, DirectX 11.1, Renderscript, FSAA/MSAAOpenGL ES 3.1, OpenCL 1.1, DirectX 11, Renderscript, FSAA/MSAA
Date of Announcement01.03.2015 01.03.2015
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttp://www.arm.com/products/multimedia/m...http://www.arm.com/products/multimedia/m...
technology14 nm
CPU in Mali-T720GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Mediatek MT67354 x 1500 MHz? MHz600 MHz
Mediatek MT87354 x 1300 MHz? MHz? MHz
Mediatek MT6735P4 x 1000 MHz? MHz600 MHz
min. - max.? MHz? - 600 MHz
CPU in Mali-T760 MP8GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Samsung Exynos 7420 Octa8 x 2100 MHz700 MHz772 MHz

Benchmarks

min: 23193     avg: 25970     median: 26964 (4%)     max: 28192 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 1375     avg: 1636     median: 1653 (0%)     max: 2008 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 2265     avg: 3255     median: 3387 (0%)     max: 4050 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 148     avg: 190     median: 169.5 (1%)     max: 284 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 120     avg: 157     median: 143 (0%)     max: 237 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 91     avg: 136     median: 116 (1%)     max: 287 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 73     avg: 91.7     median: 87 (1%)     max: 120 Points
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-T720
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-T760 MP8
min: 46     avg: 52.3     median: 53.5 (0%)     max: 56.1 fps
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-T720
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-T760 MP8
min: 30     avg: 34.3     median: 34.5 (1%)     max: 38.1 fps
min: 18     avg: 21.9     median: 22.5 (2%)     max: 25.5 fps
min: 11     avg: 14.4     median: 15 (4%)     max: 16 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
1.8 fps (0%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Onscreen
4 fps (2%)
Basemark ES 2.0 - Basemark ES 2.0
min: 20.86     avg: 32.1     median: 27.8 (46%)     max: 52.11 fps
min: 59.36     avg: 59.9     median: 59.9 (99%)     max: 60.44 fps
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 High Quality
min: 1485     avg: 2119     median: 1837 (4%)     max: 4005 Points
min: 9252     avg: 22140     median: 26124 (59%)     max: 27059 Points
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 Medium Quality
min: 3159     avg: 4471     median: 3911 (9%)     max: 8103 Points
min: 31743     avg: 35781     median: 36339.5 (81%)     max: 38701 Points
NenaMark2 - NenaMark2 Score
min: 46.6     avg: 48.2     median: 46.9 (70%)     max: 51 fps
min: 59.7     avg: 60.1     median: 60.1 (89%)     max: 60.5 fps
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile 2D Graphics Tests
min: 1568     avg: 2323     median: 2320 (2%)     max: 3158 Points
min: 4691     avg: 5019     median: 5054.5 (5%)     max: 5274 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile 3D Graphics Tests
min: 457     avg: 652     median: 577.5 (1%)     max: 1115 Points
min: 2227     avg: 2263     median: 2239.5 (5%)     max: 2345 Points
Smartbench 2012 - Smartbench 2012 Gaming Index
min: 3088     avg: 3261     median: 3183 (69%)     max: 3537
min: 4489     avg: 4519     median: 4510 (98%)     max: 4566

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-T720 → 100% n=12

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-T760 MP8 → 578% n=12

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Mali-T720:
12 fps  fps
Arena of Valor

Arena of Valor

2018
low
100%
Mali-T720:
30  fps
ultra
100%
Mali-T720:
28 fps  fps
Battle Bay

Battle Bay

2018
low
100%
Mali-T720:
38  fps  fps
high
100%
Mali-T720:
35  fps  fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
100%
Mali-T720:
26 29 29 30 30 fps ~ 29 fps
Asphalt 8: Airborne

Asphalt 8: Airborne

2013
low
100%
Mali-T720:
16 20 22 28 30 ~ 23 fps
high
100%
Mali-T720:
10 11 12 12 13 23 ~ 14 fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
100%
Mali-T720:
14 fps 18 fps ~ 16 fps
high
100%
Mali-T720:
10 fps  fps
Real Racing 3

Real Racing 3

2013
low
100%
Mali-T720:
15  fps
Temple Run 2

Temple Run 2

2013
high
100%
Mali-T720:
59  fps

Average Gaming ARM Mali-T720 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
log 06. 00:47:36

#0 checking url part for id 7332 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 6188 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 05 May 2021 17:20:23 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.054s ... 0.054s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.054s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.054s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 7332 +0.024s ... 0.078s

#8 got single benchmarks 7332 +0.023s ... 0.101s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 6188 +0s ... 0.101s

#10 got single benchmarks 6188 +0.007s ... 0.109s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.109s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.013s ... 0.122s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.122s

#14 Got 26 rows for game benchmarks. +0.012s ... 0.134s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.134s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.134s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.009s ... 0.143s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.143s

#19 return log +0.003s ... 0.146s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)