ZTE Blade V7 Lite
Specifications

Secondary Camera: 8 MPix
Price comparison
Average of 17 scores (from 22 reviews)
Reviews for the ZTE Blade V7 Lite
Darkness favors secret dealings! ZTE's Blade V7 Lite is an affordable mid-range smartphone with very appealing looks. Compared with its Blade V7 sister model, it is cheaper and aims to attract price-conscious buyers. However, the Lite version is equipped with a somewhat weaker SoC. Furthermore, it presented its dark side in our test.
Source: Trusted Reviews
Archive.org versionThe ZTE Blade V7 Lite is cheap, but not quite cheerful enough to justify the savings, with poor performance and a sub-par camera.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/20/2016
Rating: Total score: 60% price: 70% performance: 40% display: 60% mobility: 70% workmanship: 60%
Source: Gear Open
Archive.org versionFactor in a chipset which offers thoroughly average performance levels and the Blade V7 Lite begins to look more like its £150/$225 price tag – despite the admittedly gorgeous metal bodywork, which is both svelte and comfortable to hold.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/07/2016
Source: What Mobile
Archive.org versionA solid build quality and acceptable camera help this phone to stand out against similar budget handsets, but overall performance can feel slow and sluggish at times. If ZTE had included a slightly better processor, the Blade V7 Lite would’ve made a very attractive package. As it stands, this is just another good budget phone.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/03/2016
Rating: Total score: 72% price: 80% performance: 60% display: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: Recombu
Archive.org versionFor less than £10 a month on contract, the Blade V7 Lite does a good job of offering a strong set of features while keeping the cost down. You get a sturdy, attractive Android handset packed with all kinds of gesture controls, plus a solid HD display and a fingerprint sensor for extra security.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/24/2016
Rating: Total score: 70%
Foreign Reviews
Source: PCtipp.ch
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/31/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: e-media - Heft 09/2016

Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 08/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: WinFuture
DE→EN Archive.org versionComparison, online available, Medium, Date: 07/21/2016
Source: Curved
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/13/2016
Rating: Total score: 68% performance: 82% display: 65% mobility: 78%
Source: Android Magazin - Heft 4/2016

Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 07/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Blick
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/30/2016
Source: Chinahandys.net
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/09/2016
Rating: Total score: 58% performance: 40% display: 60% mobility: 50% workmanship: 70%
Source: FAQsAndroid
ES→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/14/2017
Rating: Total score: 68% price: 70% display: 65% mobility: 75% workmanship: 70%
Source: Tuexperto
ES→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Low price; excellent speakers; flexible fingerprint sensor; good cameras; nice display. Negative: Mediocre hardware; unsupport fast charge.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/15/2016
Source: AndroidPit.it
IT→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/28/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Chimera Revo
IT→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/22/2016
Rating: Total score: 69% price: 65% features: 65% mobility: 70% workmanship: 75% ergonomy: 75%
Source: Smartphone Italia
IT→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/04/2016
Rating: Total score: 70% features: 60% display: 70% mobility: 60% ergonomy: 80%
Source: AndroidPit.fr
FR→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/19/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Hitek
FR→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/21/2016
Rating: Total score: 68% price: 80% performance: 60% display: 80% mobility: 80%
Source: Top for Phone
FR→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Nice screen; high autonomy; beautiful design.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/11/2016
Source: Teknokulis
TR→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/07/2016
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 70% workmanship: 75%
Source: Log.com.tr
TR→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Good fingerprint reader; decent front cameras; metal case. Negative: Average speakers; thick screen.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 09/06/2016
Source: Helpix
RU→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/21/2017
Rating: Total score: 73%
Comment
ARM Mali-T720: Integrated graphics card in ARM based SoCs. Can be configured with up to 8 cores (T720 MP8) and 650 MHz core clock (at 28nm). Supports OpenGL ES 3.1, OpenCL 1.1, DirectX 11 FL9_3, and Renderscript.
These graphics cards are not suited for Windows 3D games. Office and Internet surfing however is possible.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
MT6735: A 64-bit quad-core SoC (4x ARM Cortex-A53) clocked at up to 1.5 GHz and designed for inexpensive tablets and smartphones.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.