Notebookcheck

ZTE Blade V10 Vita: Short review of the low-radiation smartphone

Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by Mark Riege), 07/05/2019

Affordable with an exotic SoC. The smaller sibling of the Blade V10 is priced significantly below 180 Euros (~$203), offers a large display, good storage equipment, and the current Android 9.0 Pie, but makes some compromises in terms of the camera.

The ZTE Blade V10 Vita is the most affordable mid-range device from the Chinese manufacturer. While its suggested retail price of about 179 Euros (~$202) places it more into the lower price segment, it still offers a 6.26-inch LCD display with the small HD resolution. The ZTE smartphone is run by a UNISOC processor (former Spreadtrum) that is found rather rarely. In addition, there are 3 GB of working memory and 64 GB of internal storage. The latter can be expanded via microSD card and also supports the exFAT file format requiring a licence, allowing you to even store larger files on the microSD card.

Compared to the larger Blade V10, there are primarily some compromises in the camera equipment. While the Vita model also still offers a dual-camera, it has a much lower resolution. The selfie camera also offers more of a standard fare. With 3200 mAh, the battery has the same capacity as that of its sibling model.

The case of the ZTE Blade V10 Vita is made entierly of plastic, but its workmanship is good. It is available in the colors black, green, and blue. Due to the hybrid slots, you can either use two Nano-SIM cards or one SIM and one microSD card.

Alternatives in the price range of the ZTE Blade V10 include the Nokia 4.2, the Huawei Y7 (2019), the Samsung Galaxy A20e, the Sony Xperia L3, and the Wiko View 3.

ZTE Blade V10 Vita (Blade Series)
Graphics adapter
Memory
3072 MB 
Display
6.26 inch 19:9, 1520 x 720 pixel 269 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, 10 multi-touchpoints, TFT-LCD, glossy: yes
Storage
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 56.98 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm audio port, Card Reader: microSD up to 256 GB (FAT, FAT32, exFAT), 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: position sensor, proximity sensor, microUSB
Networking
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM/GPRS/Edge (850, 900, 1800, and 1900 MHz), UMTS/HSPA+ (850, 900, and 2100 MHz), LTE Cat. 7 (Band 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, and 20), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.1 x 157.1 x 75.8 ( = 0.32 x 6.19 x 2.98 in)
Battery
3200 mAh Lithium-Ion
Operating System
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix (f/2.0) + 2 MPix (Camera2 API Level: Limited)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix (f/2.0, fixed focus)
Additional features
Speakers: mono speaker, Keyboard: onscreen, charger, USB cable, headset, 24 Months Warranty, head SAR: 0.284 W/kg, body SAR: 0.556 W/kg, FM radio, fanless
Weight
153 g ( = 5.4 oz / 0.34 pounds), Power Supply: 60 g ( = 2.12 oz / 0.13 pounds)
Price
179 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

159 mm / 6.26 inch 76.5 mm / 3.01 inch 8.2 mm / 0.3228 inch 178 g0.3924 lbs158.92 mm / 6.26 inch 76.91 mm / 3.03 inch 8.1 mm / 0.3189 inch 168 g0.3704 lbs157.1 mm / 6.19 inch 75.8 mm / 2.98 inch 8.1 mm / 0.3189 inch 153 g0.3373 lbs154 mm / 6.06 inch 72 mm / 2.83 inch 8.9 mm / 0.3504 inch 156 g0.3439 lbs148.95 mm / 5.86 inch 71.3 mm / 2.81 inch 8.39 mm / 0.3303 inch 161 g0.3549 lbs147.4 mm / 5.8 inch 69.7 mm / 2.74 inch 8.4 mm / 0.3307 inch 141 g0.3109 lbs

Communication and GNSS - The Blade V10 is cutting some corners

The ZTE Blade V10 Vita can only be connected to WLAN using the 2.4-GHz frequency range (IEEE-802.11 b/g/n). The transfer rates we measured with our Linksys EA 8500 reference router are at a decent and constant level during reception, and only the sending could have been slightly faster.

With LTE Cat. 7 and all the usual 3G and 2G frequency bands in Europe being supported, you should not have any trouble with the reception. The Blade V10 Vita supports WLAN telephony as well as VoLTE, as long as the provider offers this and supports the smartphone.

The location is determined via GPS and GLONASS. In our test, it takes a long time before our position is located accurately, and the signal is shifting from time to time. This is also reflected in our bike tour, where the ZTE smartphone only offers an accuracy that is less than satisfying.

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=414)
224 MBit/s ∼100% +337%
Sony Xperia L3
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22 MT6762, 32 GB eMMC Flash
128 (min: 81, max: 129) MBit/s ∼57% +150%
Wiko View 3
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22 MT6762, 64 GB eMMC Flash
70 (min: 57, max: 83) MBit/s ∼31% +36%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Mali-G71 MP2, 7884B, 32 GB eMMC Flash
60 (min: 47, max: 67) MBit/s ∼27% +17%
Nokia 4.2
Adreno 505, 439, 32 GB eMMC Flash
52.6 (min: 35, max: 52) MBit/s ∼23% +3%
Huawei Y7 2019
Adreno 506, 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash
52.5 (min: 50, max: 54) MBit/s ∼23% +2%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
GE8322 / IMG8322, SC9863A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
51.3 (min: 42, max: 55) MBit/s ∼23%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=414)
213 MBit/s ∼100% +484%
Sony Xperia L3
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22 MT6762, 32 GB eMMC Flash
102 (min: 90, max: 111) MBit/s ∼48% +179%
Wiko View 3
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22 MT6762, 64 GB eMMC Flash
55 (min: 47, max: 62) MBit/s ∼26% +51%
Huawei Y7 2019
Adreno 506, 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash
47.7 (min: 43, max: 52) MBit/s ∼22% +31%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Mali-G71 MP2, 7884B, 32 GB eMMC Flash
39.7 (min: 23, max: 50) MBit/s ∼19% +9%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
GE8322 / IMG8322, SC9863A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
36.5 (min: 21, max: 43) MBit/s ∼17%
Nokia 4.2
Adreno 505, 439, 32 GB eMMC Flash
35.2 (min: 24, max: 40) MBit/s ∼17% -4%
0102030405060Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø50.4 (42-55)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø36.8 (21-43)
GPS Test: outdoors
GPS Test: indoors
GPS Test: GNSS supported
Garmin Edge 500 - overview
Garmin Edge 500 - overview
Garmin Edge 500 - around the lake
Garmin Edge 500 - around the lake
Garmin Edge 500 - turning point
Garmin Edge 500 - turning point
ZTE Blade V10 Vita - overview
ZTE Blade V10 Vita - overview
ZTE Blade V10 Vita - around the lake
ZTE Blade V10 Vita - around the lake
ZTE Blade V10 Vita - turning point
ZTE Blade V10 Vita - turning point

Cameras - The Blade V10 Vita offers a slim fare

Selfie taken with the Blade V10 Vita

The front camera of the ZTE Blade V10 Vita offers an 8-MP resolution and has a nominally strong light sensitivity with an f/2.0 aperture. Videos can only be recorded at 720p. The quality is decent, but the preset beauty filter is exaggerating a lot and turns the object into a porcelain doll. In addition, bright backgrounds tend to appear burnt out. If there is little surrounding light, the image can also quickly become grainy.

The dual-camera of the ZTE smartphone consists of one 13-MP and one 2-MP lens. The latter mainly serves to gather some depth information in order to calculate a better Bokeh effect in the Aperture mode. However, this does not work well at all in practice, and the depth effect is applied to the wrong places, at times, for example, even in the middle of the face of the person we are portraying. The calculation of the effect also takes a very long time.

In daylight, it succeeds in getting some decent pictures in automatic mode, but they lack some dynamic range. In addition, bright areas can quickly appear burnt out. In lower light conditions, the images become very grainy, and the autofocus has some trouble in adjusting to the object correctly, so that you should use the LED in such situations.

Videos can be recorded in Full HD at 30 frames per second at best. 

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
Test chart
Test chart
Test chart detail
ColorChecker: The target color is displayed in the bottom half of each field.
Test chart in the dark (1 Lux)

Display - A ZTE smartphone with a decent IPS display

Subpixel grid

The IPS display of the ZTE Blade V10 Vita, which measures 6.26 inches (15.9 cm) and offers a sufficiently high resolution with 1520x720 pixels, is able to convince in the test. The brightness is at a decent level and in combination with the low black value, offers a strong contrast ratio.

The measurements are at the same level, whether we display a full-screen area or an APL-50 image. It is also great, that the full brightness of the panel is also available when manually adjusting the brightness. The minimum brightness is still at a good level, which in combination with the eye-comfort mode ensures good conditions for reading in the dark, especially since there is no PWM.

440
cd/m²
478
cd/m²
459
cd/m²
444
cd/m²
464
cd/m²
440
cd/m²
442
cd/m²
452
cd/m²
452
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 478 cd/m² Average: 452.3 cd/m² Minimum: 6.77 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 464 cd/m²
Contrast: 1657:1 (Black: 0.28 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.8 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6.1
ΔE Greyscale 2 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
92.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.33
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
TFT-LCD, 1520x720, 6.26
Huawei Y7 2019
IPS, 1520x720, 6.26
Nokia 4.2
IPS, 1520x720, 5.71
Samsung Galaxy A20e
IPS, 1560x720, 5.8
Sony Xperia L3
IPS, 1440x720, 5.7
Wiko View 3
IPS, 1520x720, 6.26
Screen
-39%
-51%
-79%
11%
-18%
Brightness middle
464
547
18%
445
-4%
475
2%
533
15%
574
24%
Brightness
452
543
20%
424
-6%
473
5%
533
18%
552
22%
Brightness Distribution
92
94
2%
91
-1%
93
1%
89
-3%
91
-1%
Black Level *
0.28
0.49
-75%
0.26
7%
0.35
-25%
0.25
11%
0.19
32%
Contrast
1657
1116
-33%
1712
3%
1357
-18%
2132
29%
3021
82%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.8
4.5
-61%
5.9
-111%
6.8
-143%
2.8
-0%
5.5
-96%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
6.1
7.9
-30%
9.3
-52%
13.4
-120%
5.1
16%
9.5
-56%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2
5
-150%
6.8
-240%
8.7
-335%
1.9
5%
5
-150%
Gamma
2.33 94%
2.35 94%
2.2 100%
2.33 94%
2.11 104%
2.1 105%
CCT
6611 98%
7400 88%
8443 77%
9385 69%
6149 106%
7610 85%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9451 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.


Grayscales (sRGB target space)
Grayscales (sRGB target space)
Mixed colors (sRGB target space)
Mixed colors (sRGB target space)
Color space (sRGB target space)
Color space (sRGB target space)
Saturation (sRGB target space)
Saturation (sRGB target space)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
24.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 10.8 ms rise
↘ 14 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 39 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (25.1 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
54.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 26.8 ms rise
↘ 28 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 89 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (40.1 ms).
The Blade V10 Vita has a hard time in direct sunlight.
The viewing angle stability is good.

Performance - An exotic SoC in the ZTE Blade

The UNISOC SC9863A is an octa-core processor with eight Cortex-A55 cores that are divided into two clusters. The performance cluster runs at up to 1.6 GHz, and the four power-saving cores run at up to 1.2 GHz. As the graphics unit, a PowerVR GE8322 is used, and the system is supported by 3 GB of working memory.

The CPU performance falls between the Snapdragon 439 and the SD450, but the GPU is considerably slower than those of the Qualcomm SoCs. This has a particularly negative impact during gaming.

We tested a few games with GameBench, and the results were sobering. "Asphalt 9" crashed after a short time, and even when it worked, the frame rates were subterranean (11 FPS). "PUBG" is barely playable in the minimal setting and often stutters. So the ZTE Blade V10 Vita is at best suitable only for the occasional gamer.

However, the system performance is okay and easily sufficient for messenger or surfing the web. 

Geekbench 4.3
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
2744 Points ∼60%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
2940 Points ∼64% +7%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
3183 Points ∼69% +16%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
3271 Points ∼71% +19%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
Points ∼0% -100%
Average UNISOC SC9863A
 
2744 Points ∼60% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=310)
4584 Points ∼100% +67%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
3526 Points ∼77%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
3870 Points ∼85% +10%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
3267 Points ∼71% -7%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
3714 Points ∼81% +5%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
Points ∼0% -100%
Average UNISOC SC9863A
 
3526 Points ∼77% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1174 - 11598, n=365)
4570 Points ∼100% +30%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
827 Points ∼61%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
761 Points ∼56% -8%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
891 Points ∼65% +8%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
1212 Points ∼89% +47%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
Points ∼0% -100%
Average UNISOC SC9863A
 
827 Points ∼61% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (691 - 4824, n=367)
1365 Points ∼100% +65%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
4558 Points ∼86%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
4499 Points ∼85% -1%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
4623 Points ∼87% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
5305 Points ∼100% +16%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
4912 Points ∼93% +8%
Average UNISOC SC9863A
 
4558 Points ∼86% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3227 - 11440, n=359)
5004 Points ∼94% +10%
Work performance score (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
6861 Points ∼99%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
5431 Points ∼79% -21%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
6228 Points ∼90% -9%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
6902 Points ∼100% +1%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
6385 Points ∼93% -7%
Average UNISOC SC9863A
 
6861 Points ∼99% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4096 - 14439, n=527)
5476 Points ∼79% -20%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
Points ∼0%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
2096 Points ∼88%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
2172 Points ∼91%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
2018 Points ∼84%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
Points ∼0%
Average UNISOC SC9863A
 
0 Points ∼0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2720 - 15735, n=47)
2395 Points ∼100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
Points ∼0%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
401 Points ∼16%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
401 Points ∼16%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
498 Points ∼20%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
Points ∼0%
Average UNISOC SC9863A
 
0 Points ∼0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5565 - 14536, n=47)
2477 Points ∼100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
Points ∼0%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
489 Points ∼23%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
490 Points ∼23%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
598 Points ∼28%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
Points ∼0%
Average UNISOC SC9863A
 
0 Points ∼0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4515 - 14786, n=50)
2133 Points ∼100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
1136 Points ∼62%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
1779 Points ∼97% +57%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
1500 Points ∼82% +32%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
1628 Points ∼89% +43%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
980 Points ∼53% -14%
Average UNISOC SC9863A
 
1136 Points ∼62% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 4535, n=375)
1836 Points ∼100% +62%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
376 Points ∼23%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
414 Points ∼26% +10%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
413 Points ∼26% +10%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
440 Points ∼27% +17%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
391 Points ∼24% +4%
Average UNISOC SC9863A
 
376 Points ∼23% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (76 - 8206, n=375)
1607 Points ∼100% +327%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
442 Points ∼30%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
499 Points ∼33% +13%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
492 Points ∼33% +11%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
525 Points ∼35% +19%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
451 Points ∼30% +2%
Average UNISOC SC9863A
 
442 Points ∼30% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (94 - 6312, n=378)
1493 Points ∼100% +238%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
1144 Points ∼63%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
1765 Points ∼97% +54%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
1516 Points ∼84% +33%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
1624 Points ∼90% +42%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
987 Points ∼55% -14%
Average UNISOC SC9863A
 
1144 Points ∼63% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 4703, n=389)
1811 Points ∼100% +58%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
629 Points ∼29%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
715 Points ∼32% +14%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
712 Points ∼32% +13%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
659 Points ∼30% +5%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
663 Points ∼30% +5%
Average UNISOC SC9863A
 
629 Points ∼29% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (131 - 14951, n=389)
2202 Points ∼100% +250%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
699 Points ∼37%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
824 Points ∼44% +18%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
807 Points ∼43% +15%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
759 Points ∼41% +9%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
715 Points ∼38% +2%
Average UNISOC SC9863A
 
699 Points ∼37% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (159 - 8141, n=390)
1869 Points ∼100% +167%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
1108 Points ∼63%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
1707 Points ∼97% +54%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
1575 Points ∼89% +42%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
1630 Points ∼92% +47%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
998 Points ∼57% -10%
Average UNISOC SC9863A
 
1108 Points ∼63% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (486 - 4320, n=451)
1765 Points ∼100% +59%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
297 Points ∼22%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
367 Points ∼28% +24%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
366 Points ∼27% +23%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
443 Points ∼33% +49%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
378 Points ∼28% +27%
Average UNISOC SC9863A
 
297 Points ∼22% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (65 - 6362, n=453)
1333 Points ∼100% +349%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
355 Points ∼28%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
445 Points ∼35% +25%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
441 Points ∼35% +24%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
526 Points ∼41% +48%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
439 Points ∼35% +24%
Average UNISOC SC9863A
 
355 Points ∼28% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (80 - 5734, n=461)
1270 Points ∼100% +258%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
1101 Points ∼62%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
1766 Points ∼100% +60%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
1568 Points ∼89% +42%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
1646 Points ∼93% +50%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1026 Points ∼58% -7%
Average UNISOC SC9863A
 
1101 Points ∼62% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (512 - 4454, n=483)
1673 Points ∼95% +52%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
466 Points ∼26%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
704 Points ∼39% +51%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
704 Points ∼39% +51%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
637 Points ∼35% +37%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
624 Points ∼34% +34%
Average UNISOC SC9863A
 
466 Points ∼26% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 10008, n=483)
1811 Points ∼100% +289%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
535 Points ∼35%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
813 Points ∼52% +52%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
802 Points ∼52% +50%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
737 Points ∼48% +38%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
684 Points ∼44% +28%
Average UNISOC SC9863A
 
535 Points ∼35% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 7820, n=491)
1550 Points ∼100% +190%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
12578 Points ∼92%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
13655 Points ∼100% +9%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
12390 Points ∼91% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
12075 Points ∼88% -4%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
11696 Points ∼86% -7%
Average UNISOC SC9863A
 
12578 Points ∼92% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4811 - 45072, n=643)
13678 Points ∼100% +9%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
9603 Points ∼48%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
12281 Points ∼61% +28%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
13440 Points ∼67% +40%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
11427 Points ∼57% +19%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
10008 Points ∼50% +4%
Average UNISOC SC9863A
 
9603 Points ∼48% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (11358 - 162695, n=643)
20096 Points ∼100% +109%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
10136 Points ∼61%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
12562 Points ∼75% +24%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
13192 Points ∼79% +30%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
11565 Points ∼69% +14%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
10340 Points ∼62% +2%
Average UNISOC SC9863A
 
10136 Points ∼61% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (11565 - 83518, n=644)
16657 Points ∼100% +64%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
18 fps ∼51%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
22 fps ∼63% +22%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
23 fps ∼66% +28%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
20 fps ∼57% +11%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
fps ∼0% -100%
Average UNISOC SC9863A
 
18 fps ∼51% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6 - 251, n=671)
35.1 fps ∼100% +95%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
25 fps ∼74%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
33 fps ∼97% +32%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
34 fps ∼100% +36%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
31 fps ∼91% +24%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
fps ∼0% -100%
Average UNISOC SC9863A
 
25 fps ∼74% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.8 - 120, n=674)
27 fps ∼79% +8%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
8.6 fps ∼44%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
9.3 fps ∼48% +8%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
9.8 fps ∼51% +14%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
11 fps ∼57% +28%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
fps ∼0% -100%
Average UNISOC SC9863A
 
8.6 fps ∼44% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.7 - 132, n=590)
19.4 fps ∼100% +126%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
15 fps ∼75%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
17 fps ∼85% +13%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
18 fps ∼90% +20%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
20 fps ∼100% +33%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
fps ∼0% -100%
Average UNISOC SC9863A
 
15 fps ∼75% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.4 - 115, n=595)
17.8 fps ∼89% +19%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
5.7 fps ∼36%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
6.1 fps ∼38% +7%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
6.4 fps ∼40% +12%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
6.5 fps ∼41% +14%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
fps ∼0% -100%
Average UNISOC SC9863A
 
5.7 fps ∼36% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.6 - 88, n=451)
16 fps ∼100% +181%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
10 fps ∼66%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
13 fps ∼86% +30%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
13 fps ∼86% +30%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
14 fps ∼92% +40%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
fps ∼0% -100%
Average UNISOC SC9863A
 
10 fps ∼66% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.4 - 110, n=454)
15.2 fps ∼100% +52%
GFXBench
High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
3.6 fps ∼40%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
3.7 fps ∼41% +3%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
3.9 fps ∼43% +8%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
4.8 fps ∼54% +33%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
fps ∼0% -100%
Average UNISOC SC9863A
 
3.6 fps ∼40% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.86 - 59, n=154)
8.97 fps ∼100% +149%
2560x1440 High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
1.1 fps ∼18%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
1.1 fps ∼18% 0%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
1.2 fps ∼19% +9%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
1.4 fps ∼22% +27%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
fps ∼0% -100%
Average UNISOC SC9863A
 
1.1 fps ∼18% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.26 - 31, n=154)
6.24 fps ∼100% +467%
Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
5.8 fps ∼43%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
6.1 fps ∼45% +5%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
6.6 fps ∼49% +14%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
7.8 fps ∼58% +34%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
fps ∼0% -100%
Average UNISOC SC9863A
 
5.8 fps ∼43% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 59, n=156)
13.5 fps ∼100% +133%
1920x1080 Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
3.2 fps ∼21%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
3.4 fps ∼23% +6%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
3.6 fps ∼24% +13%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
4 fps ∼27% +25%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
fps ∼0% -100%
Average UNISOC SC9863A
 
3.2 fps ∼21% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.94 - 63, n=155)
15 fps ∼100% +369%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
2.6 fps ∼24%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
3.4 fps ∼31% +31%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
3.5 fps ∼32% +35%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
4.2 fps ∼39% +62%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
fps ∼0% -100%
Average UNISOC SC9863A
 
2.6 fps ∼24% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.89 - 54, n=380)
10.8 fps ∼100% +315%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
3.8 fps ∼39%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
6.8 fps ∼70% +79%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
7 fps ∼72% +84%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
8.6 fps ∼89% +126%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
fps ∼0% -100%
Average UNISOC SC9863A
 
3.8 fps ∼39% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.6 - 58, n=384)
9.67 fps ∼100% +154%
Basemark GPU
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
fps ∼0%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
4.41 fps ∼29%
Average UNISOC SC9863A
 
0 fps ∼0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.53 - 37.4, n=61)
15.1 fps ∼100%
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
fps ∼0%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
6.62 fps ∼55%
Average UNISOC SC9863A
 
0 fps ∼0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.91 - 36.2, n=56)
12.1 fps ∼100%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
fps ∼0%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
4.16 fps ∼29%
Average UNISOC SC9863A
 
0 fps ∼0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.2 - 38.6, n=56)
14.3 fps ∼100%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
72796 Points ∼56%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
73468 Points ∼56% +1%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
77652 Points ∼60% +7%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
95464 Points ∼73% +31%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
77798 Points ∼60% +7%
Average UNISOC SC9863A
 
72796 Points ∼56% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (52607 - 398720, n=272)
130479 Points ∼100% +79%
VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
Score ∼0%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
552 Score ∼29%
Average UNISOC SC9863A
 
0 Score ∼0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (552 - 5025, n=58)
1911 Score ∼100%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
765 Points ∼69%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
835 Points ∼75% +9%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
834 Points ∼75% +9%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
1106 Points ∼100% +45%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
776 Points ∼70% +1%
Average UNISOC SC9863A
 
765 Points ∼69% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1731, n=602)
742 Points ∼67% -3%
Graphics (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
678 Points ∼35%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
964 Points ∼50% +42%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
1000 Points ∼51% +47%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
893 Points ∼46% +32%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
760 Points ∼39% +12%
Average UNISOC SC9863A
 
678 Points ∼35% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 15969, n=602)
1943 Points ∼100% +187%
Memory (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
790 Points ∼39%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
1377 Points ∼69% +74%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
1316 Points ∼66% +67%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
2008 Points ∼100% +154%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1247 Points ∼62% +58%
Average UNISOC SC9863A
 
790 Points ∼39% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 7500, n=602)
1449 Points ∼72% +83%
System (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
2707 Points ∼80%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
2879 Points ∼85% +6%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
2687 Points ∼80% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
3372 Points ∼100% +25%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
2517 Points ∼75% -7%
Average UNISOC SC9863A
 
2707 Points ∼80% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 12202, n=602)
2857 Points ∼85% +6%
Overall (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
1026 Points ∼64%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
1337 Points ∼83% +30%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
1310 Points ∼81% +28%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
1608 Points ∼100% +57%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1166 Points ∼73% +14%
Average UNISOC SC9863A
 
1026 Points ∼64% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (150 - 6097, n=606)
1420 Points ∼88% +38%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
124 Points ∼17%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
133 Points ∼19% +7%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
242 Points ∼34% +95%
Average UNISOC SC9863A
 
124 Points ∼17% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (35 - 2754, n=102)
709 Points ∼100% +472%


Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (14.5 - 108, n=81)
30.6 Points ∼100% +108%
Samsung Galaxy A20e (Chrome 72.0.3626.121)
21.488 Points ∼70% +46%
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74)
15.921 Points ∼52% +8%
Average UNISOC SC9863A
14.7 Points ∼48% 0%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita (Chrome 74)
14.694 Points ∼48%
Huawei Y7 2019 (Chrome 73.0.3683.90)
14.579 Points ∼48% -1%
Sony Xperia L3 (Chrome 72)
13.684 Points ∼45% -7%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 123, n=73)
34.4 runs/min ∼100% +159%
Samsung Galaxy A20e (Chrome 72.0.3626.121)
21.63 runs/min ∼63% +63%
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74)
18.23 runs/min ∼53% +37%
Sony Xperia L3 (Chrome 72)
14.7 runs/min ∼43% +11%
Huawei Y7 2019 (Chrome 73.0.3683.90)
14.6 runs/min ∼42% +10%
Average UNISOC SC9863A
13.3 runs/min ∼39% 0%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita (Chrome 74)
13.26 runs/min ∼39%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 161, n=134)
63.4 Points ∼100% +98%
Samsung Galaxy A20e (Chrome 72.0.3626.121)
48 Points ∼76% +50%
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74)
38 Points ∼60% +19%
Huawei Y7 2019 (Chrome 73.0.3683.90)
34 Points ∼54% +6%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita (Chrome 74)
32 Points ∼50%
Average UNISOC SC9863A
32 Points ∼50% 0%
Sony Xperia L3 (Chrome 72)
30 Points ∼47% -6%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy A20e (Chrome 72.0.3626.121)
7470 Points ∼100% +86%
Average of class Smartphone (1994 - 43280, n=663)
6281 Points ∼84% +56%
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74)
4810 Points ∼64% +20%
Sony Xperia L3 (Chrome 72)
4422 Points ∼59% +10%
Huawei Y7 2019 (Chrome 73.0.3683.90)
4115 Points ∼55% +2%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita (Chrome 74)
4018 Points ∼54%
Average UNISOC SC9863A
4018 Points ∼54% 0%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average UNISOC SC9863A
11698 ms * ∼100% -0%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita (Chrome 74)
11697.7 ms * ∼100%
Sony Xperia L3 (Chrome 72)
11184.8 ms * ∼96% +4%
Huawei Y7 2019 (Chrome 73.0.3683.90)
11012.1 ms * ∼94% +6%
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=683)
10792 ms * ∼92% +8%
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74)
9768.3 ms * ∼84% +16%
Samsung Galaxy A20e (Chrome 72.0.3626.121)
5546.4 ms * ∼47% +53%

* ... smaller is better

ZTE Blade V10 VitaHuawei Y7 2019Nokia 4.2Samsung Galaxy A20eSony Xperia L3Wiko View 3Average 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
99%
-2%
88%
47%
2%
87%
55%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
61.08 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
65.77 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
8%
65.87 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
8%
64.28 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
5%
61.67 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
63.57 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
4%
56.3 (58.4 - 74.7, n=100)
-8%
48.6 (9.5 - 87.1, n=405)
-20%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
81.34 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
86.38 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
6%
86.74 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
7%
79.23 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-3%
80.91 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-1%
81.74 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
74.3 (76.1 - 87.2, n=100)
-9%
66.7 (8.1 - 96.5, n=405)
-18%
Random Write 4KB
9.99
17.48
75%
4.31
-57%
13.18
32%
16.36
64%
24.2 (3.4 - 88.2, n=110)
142%
20.1 (0.14 - 250, n=712)
101%
Random Read 4KB
20.32
83.53
311%
17.51
-14%
79.76
293%
28.83
42%
54.4 (11.4 - 149, n=110)
168%
44.8 (1.59 - 175, n=712)
120%
Sequential Write 256KB
119.45
88.77
-26%
18.17
-85%
103.57
-13%
87.52
-27%
172 (40 - 246, n=110)
44%
92.2 (2.99 - 503, n=712)
-23%
Sequential Read 256KB
95.57
305.05
219%
220.39
131%
300.36
214%
290.89
204%
272 (95.6 - 704, n=110)
185%
259 (12.1 - 1468, n=712)
171%
PUBG (lowest detail settings)
0102030Tooltip
; 0.13.0: Ø24.7 (7-26)
Dead Trigger 2
0102030405060Tooltip
; 1.5.5: Ø56.5 (50-58)

Emissions - The Blade V10 offers a solid performance

Temperature

In the test, the surface temperatures of the ZTE Blade V10 Vita remain at a level that gives no reason for concern. 

Max. Load
 35 °C
95 F
35.5 °C
96 F
34.3 °C
94 F
 
 35.8 °C
96 F
36 °C
97 F
34.9 °C
95 F
 
 33.2 °C
92 F
34.1 °C
93 F
35 °C
95 F
 
Maximum: 36 °C = 97 F
Average: 34.9 °C = 95 F
33.2 °C
92 F
34.2 °C
94 F
35 °C
95 F
32.7 °C
91 F
32.5 °C
91 F
35.3 °C
96 F
31.8 °C
89 F
33 °C
91 F
34.2 °C
94 F
Maximum: 35.3 °C = 96 F
Average: 33.5 °C = 92 F
Power Supply (max.)  27.9 °C = 82 F | Room Temperature 20 °C = 68 F | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.9 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 35.5 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.3 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.5 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.

Speaker

Pink Noise levels

The speaker at the bottom of the ZTE Blade V10 Vita only offers a mediocre audio experience. However, those who like to listen to music with their smartphone still find a good companion in this, since in addition to Bluetooth audio, there is also an audio port. 

Besides SBC, the Bluetooth module also supports the high-resolution LDAC codec. 

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.740.92533.635.33134.3294033.830503934.26334.828.8803125.110030.229.412523.22616022.832.220022.633.425019.838.731520.144.440016.952.750016.859.363015.263.680015.859.2100015.869.8125014.571.416001573200014.172.7250015.372.1315014.973.1400014.974.8500014.772.6630014.770800014.972.81000014.875.11250015.363.91600015.449.3SPL27.883.9N155.4median 15.3median 63.9Delta2.113.732.233.727.830.124.123.224.926.333.337.123.827.926.226.726.228.817.422.417.23017.337.816.44516.248.315.755.214.663.816.36713.470.613.872.914.373.213.869.714.370.214.669.313.777.114.580.714.479.314.373.814.668.214.66514.557.414.842.626.786.70.862.2median 14.6median 671.413.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseZTE Blade V10 VitaHuawei Y7 2019
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
ZTE Blade V10 Vita audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 71% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 81% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Huawei Y7 2019 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 58% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 74% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Battery Life - A whole day should easily be possible

Power Consumption

The power consumption of the ZTE Blade V10 Vita is fairly low. Only under load, the large structure width (28 nm) of the SoC becomes noticeable, and modern processors are more efficient in this regard.

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.16 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.69 / 2.03 / 2.06 Watt
Load midlight 3.55 / 6.15 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
3200 mAh
Nokia 4.2
3000 mAh
Huawei Y7 2019
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A20e
3000 mAh
Sony Xperia L3
3300 mAh
Wiko View 3
4000 mAh
Average UNISOC SC9863A
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
8%
18%
21%
23%
23%
0%
-4%
Idle Minimum *
0.69
0.74
-7%
0.51
26%
0.66
4%
0.57
17%
0.67
3%
0.69
-0%
0.879 (0.2 - 3.4, n=747)
-27%
Idle Average *
2.03
1.9
6%
1.7
16%
1.63
20%
1.5
26%
1.73
15%
2.03
-0%
1.733 (0.6 - 6.2, n=746)
15%
Idle Maximum *
2.06
2.21
-7%
1.85
10%
1.67
19%
1.51
27%
1.79
13%
2.06
-0%
2.02 (0.74 - 6.6, n=747)
2%
Load Average *
3.55
3.04
14%
3.17
11%
2.77
22%
3.09
13%
2.18
39%
3.55
-0%
4.06 (0.8 - 10.8, n=741)
-14%
Load Maximum *
6.15
4.15
33%
4.44
28%
3.66
40%
4.15
33%
3.43
44%
6.15
-0%
5.88 (1.2 - 14.2, n=741)
4%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Life

While the battery life of the Blade V10 Vita is not outstanding, it is decent, considering the small battery capacity. Not only do competitors such as the Huawei Y7 have a larger battery capacity, but they also use the available resources more efficiently, so that the runtimes turn out disproportionately longer. 

Battery Runtime
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Chrome 75)
10h 44min
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
3200 mAh
Huawei Y7 2019
4000 mAh
Nokia 4.2
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A20e
3000 mAh
Sony Xperia L3
3300 mAh
Wiko View 3
4000 mAh
Battery Runtime
73%
8%
11%
0%
Reader / Idle
2350
1432
2127
WiFi v1.3
644
1113
73%
696
8%
715
11%
641
0%
Load
296
250
242
H.264
938
753
750

Pros

+ low radiation values
+ decent workmanship
+ large display with good color accuracy
+ a lot of storage + microSD support
+ hybrid SIM
+ audio port

Cons

- no NFC
- mediocre speaker
- inaccurate locating characteristics
- no DRM-L1 certification

Verdict - The Blade V10 Vita is a solid everyday companion

Testing the ZTE Blade V10 Vita. Test unit provided by cyberport.
Testing the ZTE Blade V10 Vita. Test unit provided by cyberport.

The ZTE Blade V10 Vita is trying to fight for a small piece of the very competitive entry-level segment. Those who are looking for a compact smartphone with a large display might be very happy with this smartphone. Particularly since the panel is already very well calibrated in the state of delivery and offers a very good color reproduction. The lower SAR values have become rare at this point, and the camera is also quite usable in daylight. The relatively large storage, which can be optionally expanded via microSD card, should also be positively mentioned, and also the corresponding exFAT support, which is not obligatory in this price range.

The ZTE Blade V10 Vita convinces with a good display and low radiation values. While the equipment is solid, gamers should leave their hands off the smartphone.

Only those who like to play demanding games on their smartphone should stay clear of the ZTE Blade V10 Vita, since with the weak graphics unit, playing games will not be any fun. In addition, the locating capabilities of the smartphone were similarly unable to convince us.

ZTE Blade V10 Vita - 07/04/2019 v6
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
81%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
82%
Connectivity
35 / 60 → 59%
Weight
92%
Battery
93%
Display
88%
Games Performance
21 / 63 → 34%
Application Performance
46 / 70 → 65%
Temperature
92%
Noise
100%
Audio
56 / 91 → 62%
Camera
46%
Average
69%
80%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Read all 1 comments / answer
static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Reviews > ZTE Blade V10 Vita: Short review of the low-radiation smartphone
Daniel Schmidt, 2019-07- 5 (Update: 2019-07- 6)