Notebookcheck

Wiko View 3 Review: The affordable smartphone turns out as an endurance champion

Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by Mark Riege), 07/29/2019

XXL battery life with some compromises. According to Wiko, the View 3 is the first smartphone with a triple camera in the price range below 200 Euros (~$223). Find out in our review of the Wiko smartphone whether the endurance champion of the View 3 series deserves a recommendation.

Wiko View 3 smartphone review

With the View 3, Wiko aims to bring the newest smartphone technology to the entry-level range. To do this, the French smartphone brand has equipped a Wiko smartphone that is sold in Germany for less than 200 Euros (~$223) with a triple camera for the first time. 

Wiko promises a battery life of two full days for its View smartphone. Supposedly, this is made possible by a 4000 mAh battery for one and also by the 6.26-inch IPS display with a resolution of only 1520x720 pixels. The View 3 is run by a MediaTek octa-core SoC that is accompanied by 3 GB of RAM. Using standard microSD cards, the internal storage can be expanded from 64 GB up to a maximum of 320 GB.

The competitors of the Wiko smartphone include the Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, the Huawei Y7 2019, the ZTE Blade V10 Vita, the Sony Xperia L3, and the Nokia 4.2. Together with the Wiko View 3, the View 3 Pro and the Wiko View 3 Lite sibling models complete the View series of the French smartphone vendor

Wiko View 3 (View Series)
Graphics adapter
Memory
3072 MB 
Display
6.26 inch 19:9, 1520 x 720 pixel 269 PPI, capacitive multitouch, IPS, glossy: yes
Storage
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, , 52 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm audio port, Card Reader: microSD up to 256 GB, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: proximity sensor, compass, gyroscope, acceleration sensor, OTG, Miracast, status LED
Networking
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4), Bluetooth 4.2, 4G LTE: B1 (2100)/ B3 (1800)/ B5 (850) / B7 (2600)/ B8 (900) / B20 (800) / B28B(700) / B40 (2300), H+/3G+/3G HSPA+: 850/ 900/ 1900/ 2100 MHz; GSM/GPRS/EDGE: 850/900/1800/1900 MHz, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.2 x 159 x 76.5 ( = 0.32 x 6.26 x 3.01 in)
Battery
4000 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix 12 MP (1.25 µm pixel size) + 2 MP (depth) + 13 MP (super wide angle), CameraAPI: limited
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: mono, Keyboard: virtual, headset, MicroUSB cable, modular charger, Wiko UI, 24 Months Warranty, SAR head: 0.248 W/Kg, body: 1.089 W/Kg, LTE Category 4 DL 150 Mbps, UL 50Mbps, fanless
Weight
178 g ( = 6.28 oz / 0.39 pounds), Power Supply: 56 g ( = 1.98 oz / 0.12 pounds)
Price
180 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Working For Notebookcheck

Are you a techie who knows how to write? Then join our Team! Especially English native speakers welcome!

Currently wanted: 
News and Editorial Editor - Details here

Case - The View 3 with small bezels and a lot of display

Wiko View 3 smartphone
Wiko View 3 smartphone
Color variants of the Wiko View 3
Color variants of the Wiko View 3
 

The case of the Wiko View 3 is available in three color options. You can choose among blue (Anthracite Blue), gold (Blush Gold), and turquoise (Electric Bleen). Considering the price, the workmanship is on a solid level. Although Wiko specifies a glass back, we have some doubts if we look at the haptics and temperature behavior of the surface. The plastic frame and the plastic-like feel of the back will make users notice the affordable sales price. In addition, the flat back does not really contribute to a more comfortable grip.   

On the other hand, the buttons for volume and standby show a good workmanship and posses a well-defined pressure point. The stability of the case also makes a decent impression. 

Considering the price range, the bezels above and below the display of the View 3 turned out quite slim. Expressed in numbers, 80% of the front consists of the display, which is very satisfactory for an affordable smartphone.

Wiko View 3 smartphone
Wiko View 3 smartphone
Wiko View 3 smartphone
Wiko View 3 smartphone

Size Comparison

159.21 mm / 6.27 inch 75.21 mm / 2.96 inch 8.1 mm / 0.3189 inch 186 g0.4101 lbs159 mm / 6.26 inch 76.5 mm / 3.01 inch 8.2 mm / 0.3228 inch 178 g0.3924 lbs158.92 mm / 6.26 inch 76.91 mm / 3.03 inch 8.1 mm / 0.3189 inch 168 g0.3704 lbs157.1 mm / 6.19 inch 75.8 mm / 2.98 inch 8.1 mm / 0.3189 inch 153 g0.3373 lbs154 mm / 6.06 inch 72 mm / 2.83 inch 8.9 mm / 0.3504 inch 156 g0.3439 lbs148.95 mm / 5.86 inch 71.3 mm / 2.81 inch 8.39 mm / 0.3303 inch 161 g0.3549 lbs

Equipment - Wiko smartphone with only Widevine L3

The internal eMMC storage of our test unit has a capacity of 64 GB with only 52 GB still available to users in the state of delivery. You can also expand the storage of the dual-SIM smartphone by up to 256 GB via microSD, as long as you use only a single SIM card in the hybrid slot. However, the microSD card cannot be used as internal storage and the exFAT file system is also not supported.

The 4000 mAh battery can be charged using the micro-USB connection at the bottom of the entry-level smartphone that supports the USB 2.0 standard. You can also connect peripheral devices such as USB sticks via an OTG adapter to the USB port.

Wireless transfer of the display content to an external monitor via Miracast is also supported. However, you cannot watch video content in HD quality on Netflix, Amazon Prime Video, and other video-streaming services on the View 3, since the Widevine DRM level is only specified as L3.  

Software - Stock Android 9 in the View 3

As the operating system, the French manufacturer has installed Android version 9, which is expanded with an in-house user interface. At the time of our test, the security patches (April 2019) are not really current anymore.

Compared to stock Android, the user interface of the manufacturer appears with only a few modifications. Similarly, there are hardly any third-party apps preinstalled on the Wiko View 3.

Wiko View 3 software
Wiko View 3 software
Wiko View 3 software
Wiko View 3 software

Communication and GPS - The Wiko View 3 with accurate GPS

Wiko has equipped its entry-level model with a hybrid slot with two slots for nano-SIM cards. The smartphone connects to the mobile internet via the LTE standard with both card slots. All the frequency bands that are relevant in Germany are supported by the View 3. For wireless communication, there is Bluetooth version 4.2. There is no chip for Near-Field-Communication (NFC). 

The WLAN module can handle only the IEEE-802.11b/g/n standards and therefore communicates only in the 2.4-GHz frequency band, resulting in slow transfer rates of 70 Mb/s and 55 Mb/s in our WLAN test. However, the values we measured with our Linksys EA8500 reference router remain constant. 

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
350 (min: 327, max: 361) MBit/s ∼100% +400%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=461)
230 MBit/s ∼66% +229%
Sony Xperia L3
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22 MT6762, 32 GB eMMC Flash
128 (min: 81, max: 129) MBit/s ∼37% +83%
Wiko View 3
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22 MT6762, 64 GB eMMC Flash
70 (min: 57, max: 83) MBit/s ∼20%
Nokia 4.2
Adreno 505, 439, 32 GB eMMC Flash
52.6 (min: 35, max: 52) MBit/s ∼15% -25%
Huawei Y7 2019
Adreno 506, 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash
52.5 (min: 50, max: 54) MBit/s ∼15% -25%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
GE8322 / IMG8322, SC9863A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
51.3 (min: 42, max: 55) MBit/s ∼15% -27%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
238 (min: 189, max: 285) MBit/s ∼100% +333%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=461)
219 MBit/s ∼92% +298%
Sony Xperia L3
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22 MT6762, 32 GB eMMC Flash
102 (min: 90, max: 111) MBit/s ∼43% +85%
Wiko View 3
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22 MT6762, 64 GB eMMC Flash
55 (min: 47, max: 62) MBit/s ∼23%
Huawei Y7 2019
Adreno 506, 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash
47.7 (min: 43, max: 52) MBit/s ∼20% -13%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
GE8322 / IMG8322, SC9863A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
36.5 (min: 21, max: 43) MBit/s ∼15% -34%
Nokia 4.2
Adreno 505, 439, 32 GB eMMC Flash
35.2 (min: 24, max: 40) MBit/s ∼15% -36%
0102030405060708090Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø67.3 (57-83)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø55 (47-62)
GPS Test of the Wiko View 3 indoors
GPS Test of the Wiko View 3 indoors
GPS Test of the Wiko View 3 outdoors
GPS Test of the Wiko View 3 outdoors

The Wiko View 3 can locate its position via the GPS, Beidou, GLONASS, and Galileo satellite systems. Outdoors, the location determination is fairly fast with an accuracy of about three meters. Even though the Wiko smartphone is also able to locate its position indoors, the satellite connection takes a very long time in the test.

In order to evaluate the locating accuracy of our test unit in practice, we record a route with both the Garmin Edge 500 bicycle computer and the Wiko smartphone in parallel. The difference in the distances measured by the View 3 and the professional navigation device at the end of the about 9-km long (~5.6 miles) test route is about 30 meters (98 ft). For a device of this price range, the deviations of the GPS module are small, and the locating capabilities are pleasing.

GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Wiko View 3
GPS Wiko View 3
GPS Wiko View 3
GPS Wiko View 3
GPS Wiko View 3
GPS Wiko View 3

Telephone Functions and Voice Quality - Inconspicuous Wiko smartphone

Wiko View 3 smartphone
Wiko View 3 smartphone

We feel that both the understandability as well as the maximum volume are satisfactory during our test calls using the Vodafone network. We also didn't notice any conspicuous negative characteristics in terms of the quality of the built-in microphone, which our conversation partner described as "understandable." We do not find any options for calling using the WLAN network or VoLTE in the settings menu.    

Cameras - The View 3 with a usable triple camera

Picture taken with the front camera
Picture taken with the front camera

As its cameras, the Wiko View 3 has an integrated triple camera system that includes a 13-MP and 120° wide angle lens and a depth lens with a resolution of 2 MP. The main Sony IMX 486 sensor has a resolution of 12 MP and pixel size of 1.25 μm. 

The picture quality of the main camera module with phase detection autofocus is at a very decent level - at least in good light conditions. Compared to the Honor View 20 with its Sony IMX 586, the View 3 does not need to hide with our test pictures. However, recording the variable depth sharpness does not really work well with the Wiko smartphone.

The wide angle lens also delivers some usable results, but they often remind us of the over-saturation in reproductions of nature scenes that is typical for Samsung.    

At the front there is the 8-MP selfie camera that has an f/2.0 aperture. Considering the price, the quality is good and quite suited for multimedia content and snapshots.

The 12-MP CMOS image sensor that was used can record videos with a maximum Full HD resolution at 30 FPS. If you use the front 8-MP lens, you can also record moving images in 1080p resolution.

Picture taken with the 12-MP main camera
Picture taken with the 12-MP main camera
Picture taken with the 13-MP wide angle camera
Picture taken with the 13-MP wide angle camera
Wiko View 3 smartphone
Wiko View 3 smartphone
Wiko View 3 smartphone
Wiko View 3 smartphone

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
Wiko View 3 smartphone
Wiko View 3 smartphone
Wiko View 3 smartphone
Wiko View 3 smartphone

Accessories and Warranty - The Wiko smartphone includes headphones

Optional case for the Wiko View 3
Optional case for the Wiko View 3

In addition to the View 3 itself, the box includes a quick-start manual, a modular 10-watt charger (2 A, 5 V), and a USB charging cable. There are also Wiko headphones. 

Wiko offers a 24-month warranty period for its smartphones.

Input Devices and Operation - The View 3 with a bad oleophobic coating

The capacitive multi-touchscreen is able to recognize up to five touch points simultaneously. It has a smooth surface, but the grease-repellent coating (oleophobic coating) works less well in the View 3. The screen responds to input up to the corner areas precisely. 

To unlock the Wiko smartphone, you can use biometric identification via fingerprint or face recognition. The active fingerprint sensor on the back of the case works fairly reliably with dry fingers but is not very fast. This is similar for the face unlock function: Even though it is slow, it does its work without any problems.

Wiko View 3 smartphone
Wiko View 3 smartphone
Wiko View 3 smartphone

Display - An IPS panel with a 720p resolution in the View 3

Subpixel grid
Subpixel grid

The 6.26-inch LCD display in the 19:9 format has a resolution of 1520x720 pixels. With this, the pixel density of the View 3 remains significantly below the magical 300-ppi mark. In everyday operation, the low resolution is negatively noticeable, particularly with small writing.   

With a pure white display background, the maximum brightness is 574 cd/m², which is a good value, considering the price. With the brightness sensor activated to control the display brightness, we measure a very similar brightness of 577 cd/m². In addition, we also evaluate the brightness of the panel with an even distribution of bright and dark areas in our test (APL50). Here, we measure a maximum brightness of 569 cd/m². 

530
cd/m²
571
cd/m²
552
cd/m²
550
cd/m²
574
cd/m²
550
cd/m²
523
cd/m²
564
cd/m²
557
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 574 cd/m² Average: 552.3 cd/m² Minimum: 12 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 574 cd/m²
Contrast: 3021:1 (Black: 0.19 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.5 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6
ΔE Greyscale 5 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
92.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.1
Wiko View 3
IPS, 1520x720, 6.26
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.3
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
TFT-LCD, 1520x720, 6.26
Nokia 4.2
IPS, 1520x720, 5.71
Huawei Y7 2019
IPS, 1520x720, 6.26
Sony Xperia L3
IPS, 1440x720, 5.7
Screen
2%
2%
-21%
-24%
11%
Brightness middle
574
541
-6%
464
-19%
445
-22%
547
-5%
533
-7%
Brightness
552
540
-2%
452
-18%
424
-23%
543
-2%
533
-3%
Brightness Distribution
91
91
0%
92
1%
91
0%
94
3%
89
-2%
Black Level *
0.19
0.33
-74%
0.28
-47%
0.26
-37%
0.49
-158%
0.25
-32%
Contrast
3021
1639
-46%
1657
-45%
1712
-43%
1116
-63%
2132
-29%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.5
2.7
51%
2.8
49%
5.9
-7%
4.5
18%
2.8
49%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
9.5
4.6
52%
6.1
36%
9.3
2%
7.9
17%
5.1
46%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
5
3.1
38%
2
60%
6.8
-36%
5
-0%
1.9
62%
Gamma
2.1 105%
2.26 97%
2.33 94%
2.2 100%
2.35 94%
2.11 104%
CCT
7610 85%
6853 95%
6611 98%
8443 77%
7400 88%
6149 106%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9331 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

The combination of the display brightness and the black value of 0.19 cd/m² results in a very good contrast ratio of 1:3021 (APL-50: 0.34 cd/m², 1:1674). The display analysis with a photo spectrometer and the CalMAN software shows in parts significant deviations in the color (5.5) and grayscale (5.0) reproduction. In addition, the measured color temperature of 7610 Kelvin is too cool, resulting in a slight blue tint in practice.

CalMAN Color Accuracy (sRGB color space)
CalMAN Color Accuracy (sRGB color space)
CalMAN Color Space (sRGB color space)
CalMAN Color Space (sRGB color space)
CalMAN Grayscale (sRGB color space)
CalMAN Grayscale (sRGB color space)
CalMAN Saturation (sRGB color space)
CalMAN Saturation (sRGB color space)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
16.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6 ms rise
↘ 10.8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 19 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.8 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
49.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 31.2 ms rise
↘ 18 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 82 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (39.5 ms).

Even on sunny days, the liquid crystal display offers sufficient brightness to read the screen content. However in direct sunlight, the reflective display makes it difficult to perfectly read the screen. In addition, the bad grease-repellent coating on the touchscreen is annoying. 

As typical for an IPS panel, the viewing-angle stability is good, and there is only little brightness reduction from extreme viewing angles. 

Wiko View 3 smartphone
Wiko View 3 smartphone
Wiko View 3 smartphone
Wiko View 3 smartphone
Wiko View 3 smartphone
 

Performance - MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 and 3 GB of RAM

The MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 integrates eight ARM Cortex-A53 cores in two clusters. The four cores of the performance cluster offer a clock speed of up to 2 GHz, while the energy-efficient cluster in the View 3 runs at a maximum of 1.5 GHz. Thanks to their big.LITTLE configuration, all the cores can be used together. The integrated graphics card is a PowerVR GE8320k, which has a clock speed of 650 MHz.

In the benchmarks, the MediaTek CPU makes a good impression. The Wiko View 3 ranges at about the level of the Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 in the Huawei Y7 2019. The situation is similar in the graphics tests of the GFXBench benchmarks. 

Subjectively, the system performance could still be optimized despite the low display resolution. The View 3 often shows smaller delays, and scrolling in the browser often appears to be stuttering. The speed of the flash storage is also relatively slow, so that apps and games need a fairly long time to load. 

Compared to our low-budget competitors, the read and write access rates to our reference microSD card (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501; max. reading: 270 MB/s, writing: 150 MB/s) are within the average. 

Geekbench 4.4
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
3015 Points ∼54%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
5576 Points ∼100% +85%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
2744 Points ∼49% -9%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
3183 Points ∼57% +6%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
2940 Points ∼53% -2%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (2166 - 3015, n=6)
2664 Points ∼48% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=328)
4681 Points ∼84% +55%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
3655 Points ∼62%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
5913 Points ∼100% +62%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
3526 Points ∼60% -4%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
3267 Points ∼55% -11%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
3870 Points ∼65% +6%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (3300 - 3660, n=7)
3468 Points ∼59% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (883 - 11598, n=387)
4727 Points ∼80% +29%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
749 Points ∼46%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1639 Points ∼100% +119%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
827 Points ∼50% +10%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
891 Points ∼54% +19%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
761 Points ∼46% +2%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (749 - 824, n=7)
778 Points ∼47% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (390 - 4824, n=387)
1429 Points ∼87% +91%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
5135 Points ∼83%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
6187 Points ∼100% +20%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
4558 Points ∼74% -11%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
4623 Points ∼75% -10%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
4499 Points ∼73% -12%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
4912 Points ∼79% -4%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (3805 - 5237, n=9)
4644 Points ∼75% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 11690, n=399)
5379 Points ∼87% +5%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
6912 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
6870 Points ∼99% -1%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
6861 Points ∼99% -1%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
6228 Points ∼90% -10%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
5431 Points ∼79% -21%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
6385 Points ∼92% -8%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (4404 - 6922, n=9)
5891 Points ∼85% -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 15193, n=566)
5844 Points ∼85% -15%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2768 Points ∼100%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
1136 Points ∼41%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
1500 Points ∼54%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
1779 Points ∼64%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
980 Points ∼35%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (912 - 1183, n=8)
992 Points ∼36%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5576, n=406)
2002 Points ∼72%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1262 Points ∼69%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
376 Points ∼21%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
413 Points ∼23%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
414 Points ∼23%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
391 Points ∼21%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (376 - 449, n=8)
420 Points ∼23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 8374, n=406)
1824 Points ∼100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1436 Points ∼85%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
442 Points ∼26%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
492 Points ∼29%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
499 Points ∼29%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
451 Points ∼27%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (435 - 521, n=8)
481 Points ∼28%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 6916, n=407)
1693 Points ∼100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
975 Points ∼35%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2772 Points ∼100% +184%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
1144 Points ∼41% +17%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
1516 Points ∼55% +55%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
1765 Points ∼64% +81%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
987 Points ∼36% +1%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (900 - 1195, n=9)
987 Points ∼36% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5133, n=435)
1910 Points ∼69% +96%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
452 Points ∼19%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2006 Points ∼82% +344%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
629 Points ∼26% +39%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
712 Points ∼29% +58%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
715 Points ∼29% +58%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
663 Points ∼27% +47%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (452 - 740, n=9)
665 Points ∼27% +47%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=435)
2432 Points ∼100% +438%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
513 Points ∼25%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2073 Points ∼100% +304%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
699 Points ∼34% +36%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
807 Points ∼39% +57%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
824 Points ∼40% +61%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
715 Points ∼34% +39%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (513 - 808, n=9)
715 Points ∼34% +39%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10427, n=435)
2040 Points ∼98% +298%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2708 Points ∼100%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
1108 Points ∼41%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
1575 Points ∼58%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
1707 Points ∼63%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
998 Points ∼37%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (860 - 1130, n=8)
971 Points ∼36%
Average of class Smartphone
  (486 - 4909, n=486)
1907 Points ∼70%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1189 Points ∼79%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
297 Points ∼20%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
366 Points ∼24%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
367 Points ∼24%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
378 Points ∼25%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (257 - 392, n=8)
328 Points ∼22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 7150, n=486)
1510 Points ∼100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1358 Points ∼93%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
355 Points ∼24%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
441 Points ∼30%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
445 Points ∼31%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
439 Points ∼30%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (305 - 459, n=8)
385 Points ∼26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 6319, n=487)
1453 Points ∼100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
943 Points ∼33%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2834 Points ∼100% +201%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
1101 Points ∼39% +17%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
1568 Points ∼55% +66%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
1766 Points ∼62% +87%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1026 Points ∼36% +9%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (854 - 1139, n=9)
979 Points ∼35% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 4900, n=527)
1770 Points ∼62% +88%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
370 Points ∼19%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1925 Points ∼97% +420%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
466 Points ∼24% +26%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
704 Points ∼36% +90%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
704 Points ∼36% +90%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
624 Points ∼31% +69%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (370 - 645, n=9)
523 Points ∼26% +41%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 11302, n=526)
1982 Points ∼100% +436%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
428 Points ∼21%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2073 Points ∼100% +384%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
535 Points ∼26% +25%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
802 Points ∼39% +87%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
813 Points ∼39% +90%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
684 Points ∼33% +60%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (428 - 714, n=9)
582 Points ∼28% +36%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 8338, n=529)
1708 Points ∼82% +299%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
14036 Points ∼74%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
19087 Points ∼100% +36%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
12578 Points ∼66% -10%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
12390 Points ∼65% -12%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
13655 Points ∼72% -3%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
11696 Points ∼61% -17%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (9674 - 15069, n=9)
11940 Points ∼63% -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 45072, n=687)
14357 Points ∼75% +2%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
10689 Points ∼36%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
29496 Points ∼100% +176%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
9603 Points ∼33% -10%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
13440 Points ∼46% +26%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
12281 Points ∼42% +15%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
10008 Points ∼34% -6%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (9536 - 11349, n=9)
10461 Points ∼35% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209204, n=685)
22559 Points ∼76% +111%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
11287 Points ∼43%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
26308 Points ∼100% +133%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
10136 Points ∼39% -10%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
13192 Points ∼50% +17%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
12562 Points ∼48% +11%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
10340 Points ∼39% -8%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (9835 - 11921, n=9)
10713 Points ∼41% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 97276, n=685)
18200 Points ∼69% +61%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
20 fps ∼39%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
51 fps ∼100% +155%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
18 fps ∼35% -10%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
23 fps ∼45% +15%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
22 fps ∼43% +10%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
fps ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (17 - 20, n=8)
19 fps ∼37% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=705)
38.5 fps ∼75% +93%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
27 fps ∼61%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
44 fps ∼100% +63%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
25 fps ∼57% -7%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
34 fps ∼77% +26%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
33 fps ∼75% +22%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
fps ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (24 - 27, n=8)
26 fps ∼59% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 120, n=714)
28.3 fps ∼64% +5%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
10 fps ∼43%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
23 fps ∼100% +130%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
8.6 fps ∼37% -14%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
9.8 fps ∼43% -2%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
9.3 fps ∼40% -7%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
fps ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (9.1 - 10, n=8)
9.64 fps ∼42% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=610)
22.3 fps ∼97% +123%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
17 fps ∼85%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
20 fps ∼100% +18%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
15 fps ∼75% -12%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
18 fps ∼90% +6%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
17 fps ∼85% 0%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
fps ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (15 - 17, n=8)
16.5 fps ∼83% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=619)
19.6 fps ∼98% +15%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
6.2 fps ∼34%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
15 fps ∼82% +142%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
5.7 fps ∼31% -8%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
6.4 fps ∼35% +3%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
6.1 fps ∼34% -2%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
fps ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (4.6 - 6.2, n=8)
5.85 fps ∼32% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=475)
18.2 fps ∼100% +194%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
11 fps ∼65%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
13 fps ∼76% +18%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
10 fps ∼59% -9%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
13 fps ∼76% +18%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
13 fps ∼76% +18%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
fps ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (10 - 11, n=8)
10.6 fps ∼62% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=477)
17 fps ∼100% +55%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
4.3 fps ∼42%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
4.8 fps ∼47% +12%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
3.6 fps ∼35% -16%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
3.9 fps ∼38% -9%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
3.7 fps ∼36% -14%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
fps ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (4.1 - 4.3, n=8)
4.25 fps ∼42% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=198)
10.2 fps ∼100% +137%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1.6 fps ∼23%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
3.2 fps ∼45% +100%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
1.1 fps ∼16% -31%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
1.2 fps ∼17% -25%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
1.1 fps ∼16% -31%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
fps ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (1.3 - 1.6, n=8)
1.388 fps ∼20% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 33, n=197)
7.08 fps ∼100% +343%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
6.8 fps ∼45%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
7.6 fps ∼51% +12%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
5.8 fps ∼39% -15%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
6.6 fps ∼44% -3%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
6.1 fps ∼41% -10%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
fps ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (6.7 - 6.8, n=8)
6.78 fps ∼45% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=202)
15 fps ∼100% +121%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
4.7 fps ∼28%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
8.7 fps ∼52% +85%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
3.2 fps ∼19% -32%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
3.6 fps ∼21% -23%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
3.4 fps ∼20% -28%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
fps ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (3.5 - 4.7, n=8)
3.78 fps ∼23% -20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 87, n=202)
16.8 fps ∼100% +257%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
2.9 fps ∼23%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
9.1 fps ∼73% +214%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
2.6 fps ∼21% -10%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
3.5 fps ∼28% +21%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
3.4 fps ∼27% +17%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
fps ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (2.1 - 2.9, n=8)
2.68 fps ∼22% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=400)
12.4 fps ∼100% +328%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
4.7 fps ∼42%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
7.8 fps ∼70% +66%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
3.8 fps ∼34% -19%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
7 fps ∼63% +49%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
6.8 fps ∼61% +45%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
fps ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (3.8 - 5.1, n=8)
4.44 fps ∼40% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=404)
11.1 fps ∼100% +136%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
76398 Points ∼53%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
143352 Points ∼100% +88%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
72796 Points ∼51% -5%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
77652 Points ∼54% +2%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
73468 Points ∼51% -4%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
77798 Points ∼54% +2%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (71347 - 88242, n=9)
76135 Points ∼53% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (17073 - 462516, n=296)
143005 Points ∼100% +87%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
703 Points ∼65%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1086 Points ∼100% +54%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
765 Points ∼70% +9%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
834 Points ∼77% +19%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
835 Points ∼77% +19%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
776 Points ∼71% +10%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (10 - 835, n=8)
578 Points ∼53% -18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1745, n=643)
765 Points ∼70% +9%
Graphics (sort by value)
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
799 Points ∼35%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2308 Points ∼100% +189%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
678 Points ∼29% -15%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
1000 Points ∼43% +25%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
964 Points ∼42% +21%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
760 Points ∼33% -5%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (744 - 799, n=8)
769 Points ∼33% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=643)
2116 Points ∼92% +165%
Memory (sort by value)
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1019 Points ∼44%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2332 Points ∼100% +129%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
790 Points ∼34% -22%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
1316 Points ∼56% +29%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
1377 Points ∼59% +35%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1247 Points ∼53% +22%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (661 - 1247, n=8)
928 Points ∼40% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 7500, n=643)
1558 Points ∼67% +53%
System (sort by value)
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
2619 Points ∼51%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
5141 Points ∼100% +96%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
2707 Points ∼53% +3%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
2687 Points ∼52% +3%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
2879 Points ∼56% +10%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
2517 Points ∼49% -4%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (2165 - 2619, n=8)
2343 Points ∼46% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=643)
3039 Points ∼59% +16%
Overall (sort by value)
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1106 Points ∼47%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2342 Points ∼100% +112%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
1026 Points ∼44% -7%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
1310 Points ∼56% +18%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
1337 Points ∼57% +21%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1166 Points ∼50% +5%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (323 - 1166, n=8)
896 Points ∼38% -19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6097, n=643)
1526 Points ∼65% +38%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 133, n=115)
36.4 Points ∼100% +181%
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74)
15.921 Points ∼44% +23%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita (Chrome 74)
14.694 Points ∼40% +14%
Huawei Y7 2019 (Chrome 73.0.3683.90)
14.579 Points ∼40% +13%
Sony Xperia L3 (Chrome 72)
13.684 Points ∼38% +6%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (12.9 - 13.9, n=3)
13.5 Points ∼37% +4%
Wiko View 3 (Chrome 75)
12.933 Points ∼36%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 (Chrome 72)
10679 Points ∼100% +160%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=701)
6908 Points ∼65% +68%
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74)
4810 Points ∼45% +17%
Sony Xperia L3 (Chrome 72)
4422 Points ∼41% +7%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (3312 - 4508, n=9)
4166 Points ∼39% +1%
Huawei Y7 2019 (Chrome 73.0.3683.90)
4115 Points ∼39% 0%
Wiko View 3 (Chrome 75)
4114 Points ∼39%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita (Chrome 74)
4018 Points ∼38% -2%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Wiko View 3 (Chrome 75)
11757.3 ms * ∼100%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (10846 - 12799, n=9)
11753 ms * ∼100% -0%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita (Chrome 74)
11697.7 ms * ∼99% +1%
Sony Xperia L3 (Chrome 72)
11184.8 ms * ∼95% +5%
Huawei Y7 2019 (Chrome 73.0.3683.90)
11012.1 ms * ∼94% +6%
Average of class Smartphone (571 - 59466, n=726)
10451 ms * ∼89% +11%
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74)
9768.3 ms * ∼83% +17%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 (Chrome 72)
3948 ms * ∼34% +66%

* ... smaller is better

Wiko View 3Xiaomi Redmi Note 7ZTE Blade V10 VitaNokia 4.2Huawei Y7 2019Sony Xperia L3Average 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
30%
-22%
-37%
21%
-1%
31%
13%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
63.57 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
59.51 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-6%
61.08 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-4%
65.87 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
4%
65.77 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
3%
61.67 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-3%
57.5 (11.2 - 74.7, n=105)
-10%
49.5 (1.7 - 87.1, n=437)
-22%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
81.74 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
83.18 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
81.34 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
86.74 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
6%
86.38 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
6%
80.91 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-1%
76.5 (21.1 - 87.2, n=105)
-6%
67.7 (8.1 - 96.5, n=437)
-17%
Random Write 4KB
8.98
16.06
79%
9.99
11%
4.31
-52%
17.48
95%
16.36
82%
24.8 (3.4 - 125, n=118)
176%
23.1 (0.14 - 259, n=762)
157%
Random Read 4KB
55.23
82.94
50%
20.32
-63%
17.51
-68%
83.53
51%
28.83
-48%
55 (11.4 - 149, n=118)
0%
48.5 (1.59 - 226, n=762)
-12%
Sequential Write 256KB
132.39
204.72
55%
119.45
-10%
18.17
-86%
88.77
-33%
87.52
-34%
171 (40 - 246, n=118)
29%
99.5 (2.99 - 590, n=762)
-25%
Sequential Read 256KB
287.32
283.36
-1%
95.57
-67%
220.39
-23%
305.05
6%
290.89
1%
273 (95.6 - 704, n=118)
-5%
280 (12.1 - 1781, n=762)
-3%

Games - Hardly any chance for fun in gaming with the PowerVR GE8320k

More-demanding 3D games from the Android Play Store such as PUBG Mobile can only be played with reduced graphics details. But even then, the reproduction is marred by drops in the frame rate. The Asphalt 9 Legends racing game that we tested cannot even be played with minimal graphics settings anywhere near smoothly. 

Thanks to the well-functioning position sensor and the satisfactory accuracy of the display, the control and inputs succeed without any problems.

Asphalt 9 Legends
Asphalt 9 Legends
PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile

Emissions - A cool Wiko smartphone

Temperature

Our measurements of the surface temperatures are very low, and in everyday operation noticeable warming only occurs during load. 

Max. Load
 29.7 °C
85 F
30 °C
86 F
28.8 °C
84 F
 
 29.7 °C
85 F
29.8 °C
86 F
29.6 °C
85 F
 
 29.1 °C
84 F
29.1 °C
84 F
30.1 °C
86 F
 
Maximum: 30.1 °C = 86 F
Average: 29.5 °C = 85 F
28 °C
82 F
28.7 °C
84 F
29.6 °C
85 F
28.5 °C
83 F
28.8 °C
84 F
29.8 °C
86 F
28 °C
82 F
28.2 °C
83 F
29.4 °C
85 F
Maximum: 29.8 °C = 86 F
Average: 28.8 °C = 84 F
Power Supply (max.)  26.2 °C = 79 F | Room Temperature 20 °C = 68 F | Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 29.5 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 30.1 °C / 86 F, compared to the average of 35.5 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 29.8 °C / 86 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.8 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
Wiko View 3
Wiko View 3

Speaker

Speaker test: Pink Noise
Speaker test: Pink Noise

In everyday usage, the mono speaker that is positioned at the bottom edge of the case already distorts at low volumes. As expected, the sound spectrum is dominated by sounds in the mid and high ranges that are not reproduced very linear. Bass frequencies are not audible.  

The View 3 includes a 3.5-mm audio port, so that you can use headphones without any problems. 

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2042.235.32531.230.93127.227.34023.729.6503139.66322.728.18022.830.910024.42112520.923.216020.337.520019.141.525016.4473151650.740017.658.850015.26063014.661.980015.471.3100014.875.2125015.276.1160015.675.9200014.878.2250014.678.6315014.379.6400014.678.3500014.770.9630015.373.8800015.369.81000014.966.11250015.354.91600015.639SPL27.387.8N0.967.3median 15.3median 66.1Delta1.215.236.635.428.224.524.6242124.42834.727.226.825.422.223.621.519.223.92040.816.449.71756.616.560.415.665.214.37012.869.71470.314.67314.276.81476.914.179.514.479.414.277.414.675.514.173.114.666.914.767.715.17314.968.4155726.687.60.869median 14.6median 69.71.69hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseWiko View 3Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Wiko View 3 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 76% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 85% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Battery Life - The View 3 is an endurance champion

Power Consumption

The power consumption of the View 3 is inconspicuous and remains in part significantly below that of the comparison devices.

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.14 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.67 / 1.73 / 1.79 Watt
Load midlight 2.18 / 3.43 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Wiko View 3
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
4000 mAh
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
3200 mAh
Nokia 4.2
3000 mAh
Huawei Y7 2019
4000 mAh
Sony Xperia L3
3300 mAh
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-59%
-35%
-21%
-10%
-4%
-17%
-41%
Idle Minimum *
0.67
0.61
9%
0.69
-3%
0.74
-10%
0.51
24%
0.57
15%
0.711 (0.57 - 1, n=9)
-6%
0.882 (0.2 - 3.4, n=791)
-32%
Idle Average *
1.73
1.95
-13%
2.03
-17%
1.9
-10%
1.7
2%
1.5
13%
1.589 (1 - 2.4, n=9)
8%
1.74 (0.6 - 6.2, n=790)
-1%
Idle Maximum *
1.79
2.03
-13%
2.06
-15%
2.21
-23%
1.85
-3%
1.51
16%
1.982 (1.51 - 2.9, n=9)
-11%
2.03 (0.74 - 6.6, n=791)
-13%
Load Average *
2.18
4.56
-109%
3.55
-63%
3.04
-39%
3.17
-45%
3.09
-42%
3.05 (2.18 - 4, n=9)
-40%
4.07 (0.8 - 10.8, n=785)
-87%
Load Maximum *
3.43
9.15
-167%
6.15
-79%
4.15
-21%
4.44
-29%
4.15
-21%
4.65 (3.43 - 5.9, n=9)
-36%
5.94 (1.2 - 14.2, n=785)
-73%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Life

At more than 16.5 hours, the 4000 mAh battery of the Wiko smartphone lasts for a very long time in our WLAN surf test with adjusted brightness.  After being completely discharged, the View can be recharged back up to 100% relatively quickly (2.5 h), thanks to fast charging using the 10-watt charger.

Battery Runtime
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
16h 35min
Wiko View 3
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
4000 mAh
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
3200 mAh
Nokia 4.2
3000 mAh
Huawei Y7 2019
4000 mAh
Sony Xperia L3
3300 mAh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3
995
768
-23%
644
-35%
696
-30%
1113
12%
641
-36%

Pros

+ bright IPS panel
+ long battery life
+ accurate GPS
+ modern design
+ solid cameras
+ hardly any warming

Cons

- bad speaker
- only a 720p display resolution
- Widevine L3
- weak SoC

Verdict - Too many negatives with plenty of positives

In review: Wiko View 3. Test unit provided by Wiko Germany.
In review: Wiko View 3. Test unit provided by Wiko Germany.

Wiko has done a lot of things right with its View 3 entry-level smartphone. Despite the affordable price, the design is modern, the bezels turned out relatively slim, and the workmanship is satisfactory. In addition, it offers solid cameras that turn out surprisingly good in parts, and it has a very long battery life combined with proven equipment features such as a status LED and a 3.5 mm audio port. 

Those who are looking for an affordable smartphone with a modern design and long battery life and are willing to live with some compromises might be happy with the Wiko View 3. 

On the other hand, the Wiko View 3 also fails in some areas that play an important role in everyday operation. While you still might be able to live with the really bad speaker and the low resolution of the otherwise good IPS panel – although the Redmi series from Xiaomi has had usable 1080p panels for years even in the price range below 200 Euros (~$223)  it might be much harder to live with the low system performance of the Helio P22. With the compromise of a 720p display in 2019, users should be able to expect a better performance in everyday use, particularly since the View 3 runs with an almost unmodified vanilla Android OS. We reduced our performance evaluation slightly because of this. 

Wiko View 3 - 07/27/2019 v6(old)
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
83%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
88%
Connectivity
36 / 60 → 60%
Weight
90%
Battery
100%
Display
84%
Games Performance
22 / 63 → 35%
Application Performance
36 / 70 → 51%
Temperature
94%
Noise
100%
Audio
52 / 91 → 57%
Camera
52%
Average
70%
81%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Reviews > Wiko View 3 Review: The affordable smartphone turns out as an endurance champion
Marcus Herbrich, 2019-07-29 (Update: 2019-07-29)