Notebookcheck

Wiko View 4 Lite Review - Entry-level Smartphone with Strong Battery

Débutants en français. With the View 4 Lite, Wiko polishes up the entry-level model of its mid-range series. While many specifications are rather class-typical, especially the triple camera and the strong battery stand out from the crowd.
Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy),
Wiko View 4 Lite (View Series)
Processor
Mediatek Helio A25 8 x 1.8 GHz, Cortex-A53
Graphics adapter
Memory
2048 MB 
Display
6.52 inch 20:9, 1600 x 720 pixel 269 PPI, Capacitive, IPS, glossy: yes, 60 Hz
Storage
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 20.52 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: Klinkenanschluss (3.5 mm), Card Reader: microSD up to 256 GB (FAT, FAT32), Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Acceleration and proximity sensor, gyroscope, compass, USB-OTG
Networking
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM/GPRS/Edge (850, 900, 1800 and 1900 MHz) UMTS/HSPA+ (850, 900, 1900 and 2100 MHz), LTE Cat. 4 (Band 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28 and 40), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.45 x 167 x 76.8 ( = 0.33 x 6.57 x 3.02 in)
Battery
4000 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix (wide angle, f/2.0) + 5 MPix (ultra wide angle, 114 °, f/2.2) + 2 MPix (depth sensor); Camera2 API level: Full
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: Mono, Keyboard: Virtual, Power supply (7.55 watts), USB cable, SIM tool, headset, documentation, Wiko Launcher, Wiko Health, 24 Months Warranty, Head SAR: 0.538 W/kg, body SAR: 1.582 W/kg, single-band GNSS: GPS, Glonass, BeiDou, Galileo and SBAS, fanless
Weight
174 g ( = 6.14 oz / 0.38 pounds), Power Supply: 64 g ( = 2.26 oz / 0.14 pounds)
Price
130 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Comparison devices

Bewertung
Rating Version
Datum
Modell
Gewicht
Laufwerk
Groesse
Aufloesung
Preis ab
75 %7
06/2020
Wiko View 4 Lite
Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320
174 g32 GB eMMC Flash6.52"1600x720
75 %7
01/2020
Huawei Y6s
Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300
150 g32 GB eMMC Flash6.09"1560x720
75 %7
06/2020
Alcatel 1S (2020)
Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320
165 g32 GB eMMC Flash6.22"1520x720
75 %7
05/2020
Motorola Moto E6s
Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320
160 g32 GB eMMC Flash6.1"1560x720

Case, equipment and operation - View 4 with face recognition

Wiko View 4 Lite has a frame and a plastic back. The former is quite strikingly curved outwards, which makes the smartphone look a bit wider. The gaps are tight and close evenly, and the Smartphone will not make a sound when it tries to twist the frame. The battery is firmly installed and there is no special protection against the penetration of dust and water. 

The micro-USB port looks a bit old-fashioned, but is still quite common in this price range. MicroSD cards are supported up to a size of 256 GB according to the manufacturer's specifications, but without exFAT support. DRM certification is also not available, so that correspondingly protected content can only be played back in SD quality. Corded headphones can be connected to the audio jack, which serve as an antenna for the FM receiver. Unfortunately NFC does not exist.

The Wiko View 4 Lite can only access the mobile internet via the LTE network at best. This is not very fast, but all important frequency bands are supported. Only the 2.4 GHz network is available in the WLAN. This is sufficiently fast, but the View 4 Lite does not manage to establish a stable connection to our reference router Netgear Nighthawk AX12. 

The voice quality is fine. The speaker is occasionally accompanied by a little noise, but is always easy to understand. No noise suppression has not been implemented, but the microphone focuses on the frequency range of the human voice, so that the View 4 user can be easily understood even in noisy environments. The loudspeaker transmits speech somewhat softly and slightly reverberating, but is easy to use in quiet environments. If supported by the provider, the Wiko smartphone can also handle VoLTE and WLAN calling. 

The capacitive touch screen reliably recognizes inputs and converts them accurately. The glass surface offers good sliding properties. Google's GBoard is pre-installed as a keyboard layout.

The View 4 Lite does not have a fingerprint scanner, but face recognition (2D) can be set up. This works very reliably, but is less secure and also takes a moment to identify.

Android 10 is used as the operating system. Unfortunately, the security updates at the time of the test (June 2020) are still at the level of 5 January 2020 and thus already quite old. 

Size comparison

167 mm / 6.57 inch 76.8 mm / 3.02 inch 8.45 mm / 0.3327 inch 174 g0.3836 lbs158.7 mm / 6.25 inch 74.6 mm / 2.94 inch 8.45 mm / 0.3327 inch 165 g0.3638 lbs156.3 mm / 6.15 inch 73.5 mm / 2.89 inch 8 mm / 0.315 inch 150 g0.3307 lbs155.6 mm / 6.13 inch 73 mm / 2.87 inch 8.5 mm / 0.3346 inch 160 g0.3527 lbs
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Alcatel 1S (2020)
802.11 b/g/n
65.7 (60min - 70max) MBit/s ∼100% +77%
Huawei Y6s
802.11 b/g/n
58.3 (55min - 61max) MBit/s ∼89% +57%
Motorola Moto E6s
802.11 b/g/n
43 (26min - 61max) MBit/s ∼65% +16%
Wiko View 4 Lite
802.11 b/g/n
37.2 (2min - 62max) MBit/s ∼57%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Alcatel 1S (2020)
802.11 b/g/n
62.8 (58min - 66max) MBit/s ∼100% +156%
Huawei Y6s
802.11 b/g/n
55.8 (53min - 65max) MBit/s ∼89% +128%
Motorola Moto E6s
802.11 b/g/n
35.4 (5min - 57max) MBit/s ∼56% +44%
Wiko View 4 Lite
802.11 b/g/n
24.5 (1min - 61max) MBit/s ∼39%
010203040506070Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø35.9 (2-62)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø30.4 (1-61)

Cameras - Triple camera with half-hearted ultra-wide angle

Selfie

The front camera does not provide a high resolution, but it can provide good images in daylight. The colors are shown a little too bright, but the optics can cope with difficult light situations quite well, only in low light it quickly reaches its limits.

The main camera takes decent pictures in daylight, but tends to over-expose bright areas of the picture. There is no optical zoom and digital is already over with a fourfold magnification. The ultra wide angle is not really convincing and is also not very wide with just 114°. Especially in terms of sharpness and richness of detail, some concessions have to be made. The third sensor only collects depth information. Videos can be recorded in 1.080p (30 FPS). 

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

NahaufnahmePanoramaLow-LightZoomUltraweitwinkel
click to load images
ColorChecker
29.1 ∆E
54.1 ∆E
39.6 ∆E
35.9 ∆E
45.1 ∆E
61.9 ∆E
52.9 ∆E
35.7 ∆E
42.3 ∆E
28.3 ∆E
64.9 ∆E
63.6 ∆E
31.1 ∆E
48.6 ∆E
36.9 ∆E
75.6 ∆E
43.2 ∆E
44.1 ∆E
89.7 ∆E
70.2 ∆E
52 ∆E
37 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
14 ∆E
ColorChecker Wiko View 4 Lite: 46.67 ∆E min: 14.02 - max: 89.74 ∆E
ColorChecker
6.1 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
2.6 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
1.9 ∆E
1.4 ∆E
1.7 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Wiko View 4 Lite: 5.1 ∆E min: 1.38 - max: 9.2 ∆E

Display - View 4 Lite with large IPS panel

Sub-pixel Array

With 6.52 inches, the Wiko View 4 Lite has a very large display, but due to the small HD resolution, it does not provide a particularly high pixel density and pixel structures are therefore quite visible. 

The brightness is good and there should only be problems to see anything on the display on very sunny days. However, in measurements with evenly distributed bright and dark areas, the values drop somewhat and the View 4 Lite still reaches 492 cd/m² (black value: 0.39 cd/m²; contrast: 1,262:1) in the center of the picture.

481
cd/m²
491
cd/m²
444
cd/m²
484
cd/m²
501
cd/m²
439
cd/m²
475
cd/m²
476
cd/m²
443
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 501 cd/m² Average: 470.4 cd/m² Minimum: 9.52 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 501 cd/m²
Contrast: 2004:1 (Black: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.5 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.8
ΔE Greyscale 2.7 | 0.64-98 Ø6
92.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.2
Wiko View 4 Lite
IPS, 1600x720, 6.52
Huawei Y6s
IPS, 1560x720, 6.09
Alcatel 1S (2020)
IPS, 1520x720, 6.22
Motorola Moto E6s
IPS, 1560x720, 6.1
Response Times
13%
31%
17%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
66 (34.8, 31.2)
54 (25, 29)
18%
48 (21.2, 26.8)
27%
64 (31, 33)
3%
Response Time Black / White *
34.4 (16.4, 18)
32 (15, 17)
7%
22.8 (9.2, 13.6)
34%
24 (3, 21)
30%
PWM Frequency
100 (10)
Screen
-50%
-41%
-8%
Brightness middle
501
424
-15%
470
-6%
488
-3%
Brightness
470
397
-16%
456
-3%
481
2%
Brightness Distribution
88
85
-3%
87
-1%
95
8%
Black Level *
0.25
0.35
-40%
0.33
-32%
0.25
-0%
Contrast
2004
1211
-40%
1424
-29%
1952
-3%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.5
6.45
-43%
6.7
-49%
5.02
-12%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
9.8
12.76
-30%
12.1
-23%
8.99
8%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.7
8.5
-215%
7.6
-181%
4.4
-63%
Gamma
2.2 100%
2.231 99%
2.36 93%
2.252 98%
CCT
6962 93%
9108 71%
8732 74%
7841 83%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-19% / -38%
-5% / -26%
5% / -3%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
34.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16.4 ms rise
↘ 18 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 90 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (24.4 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
66 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 34.8 ms rise
↘ 31.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 97 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (38.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17520 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.


Grayscale (Target color space: sRGB)
Grayscale (Target color space: sRGB)
Mixed colors (Target color space: sRGB)
Mixed colors (Target color space: sRGB)
Color space (Target color space: sRGB)
Color space (Target color space: sRGB)
Saturation (Target color space: sRGB)
Saturation (Target color space: sRGB)
Outdoor use
Viewing angles

Performance, emissions and battery life - Short waiting moments paired with long endurance

The Helio A25 is an entry-level SoC at the lower end of the performance scale, which is certainly reflected in the benchmarks. Nevertheless, the Wiko phone achieves a decent system performance, which is perfectly sufficient for everyday tasks and simple casual games. However, the View 4 Lite likes to allow itself an extra second of memory, which is mainly due to the rather slow memory. 

The surface temperatures are harmless and even under constant load the smartphone doesn't even get hand-warm. 

The loudspeaker on the bottom edge can't really convince, sounds dull and doesn't offer any depth. If you want to listen to something longer with the View 4 Lite, you'd better reach for an external sound output. The audio jack delivers a much better sound image, even if the signal to noise ratio of 48.28 dBFS is only satisfactory. 

With 4,000 mAh, the battery of Wiko View 4 Lite offers a lot of power and can also convert this into very good runtimes in the test. 

Geekbench 5.1 / 5.2
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Wiko View 4 Lite
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
445 Points ∼23%
Alcatel 1S (2020)
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
794 Points ∼41% +78%
Average Mediatek Helio A25
  (445 - 855, n=2)
650 Points ∼33% +46%
Average of class Smartphone
  (421 - 3531, n=122)
1956 Points ∼100% +340%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Wiko View 4 Lite
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
124 Points ∼22%
Alcatel 1S (2020)
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
136 Points ∼24% +10%
Average Mediatek Helio A25
  (124 - 141, n=2)
133 Points ∼24% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (124 - 1342, n=122)
556 Points ∼100% +348%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Wiko View 4 Lite
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
5060 Points ∼85%
Huawei Y6s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
3936 Points ∼66% -22%
Alcatel 1S (2020)
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
4817 Points ∼81% -5%
Motorola Moto E6s
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
5197 Points ∼87% +3%
Average Mediatek Helio A25
  (5027 - 5364, n=3)
5150 Points ∼86% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 15299, n=525)
5982 Points ∼100% +18%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Huawei Y6s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
4658 Points ∼66%
Motorola Moto E6s
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
6873 Points ∼98%
Average Mediatek Helio A25
  (6426 - 7655, n=2)
7041 Points ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 19989, n=683)
6565 Points ∼93%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Wiko View 4 Lite
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
1131 Points ∼51%
Huawei Y6s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
1061 Points ∼47% -6%
Alcatel 1S (2020)
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1055 Points ∼47% -7%
Motorola Moto E6s
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
1187 Points ∼53% +5%
Average Mediatek Helio A25
  (825 - 1160, n=3)
1039 Points ∼46% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5780, n=528)
2235 Points ∼100% +98%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Wiko View 4 Lite
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
395 Points ∼18%
Huawei Y6s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
443 Points ∼20% +12%
Alcatel 1S (2020)
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
394 Points ∼18% 0%
Motorola Moto E6s
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
451 Points ∼21% +14%
Average Mediatek Helio A25
  (377 - 427, n=3)
400 Points ∼18% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 10043, n=528)
2173 Points ∼100% +450%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Wiko View 4 Lite
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
462 Points ∼23%
Huawei Y6s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
509 Points ∼25% +10%
Alcatel 1S (2020)
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
458 Points ∼23% -1%
Motorola Moto E6s
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
523 Points ∼26% +13%
Average Mediatek Helio A25
  (429 - 497, n=3)
463 Points ∼23% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 8386, n=529)
2026 Points ∼100% +339%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Wiko View 4 Lite
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
1121 Points ∼52%
Huawei Y6s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
1015 Points ∼47% -9%
Alcatel 1S (2020)
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1053 Points ∼49% -6%
Motorola Moto E6s
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
1189 Points ∼55% +6%
Average Mediatek Helio A25
  (878 - 1165, n=3)
1055 Points ∼49% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5765, n=560)
2150 Points ∼100% +92%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Wiko View 4 Lite
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
768 Points ∼26%
Huawei Y6s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
712 Points ∼24% -7%
Alcatel 1S (2020)
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
763 Points ∼26% -1%
Motorola Moto E6s
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
742 Points ∼25% -3%
Average Mediatek Helio A25
  (717 - 825, n=3)
770 Points ∼26% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=560)
2926 Points ∼100% +281%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Wiko View 4 Lite
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
826 Points ∼34%
Huawei Y6s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
763 Points ∼31% -8%
Alcatel 1S (2020)
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
813 Points ∼33% -2%
Motorola Moto E6s
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
810 Points ∼33% -2%
Average Mediatek Helio A25
  (747 - 882, n=3)
818 Points ∼33% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10699, n=560)
2454 Points ∼100% +197%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Wiko View 4 Lite
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
1099 Points ∼52%
Huawei Y6s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
435 Points ∼21% -60%
Alcatel 1S (2020)
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1011 Points ∼48% -8%
Motorola Moto E6s
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
1131 Points ∼54% +3%
Average Mediatek Helio A25
  (1016 - 1138, n=3)
1084 Points ∼51% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5209, n=609)
2112 Points ∼100% +92%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Wiko View 4 Lite
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
340 Points ∼19%
Huawei Y6s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
508 Points ∼28% +49%
Alcatel 1S (2020)
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
337 Points ∼18% -1%
Motorola Moto E6s
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
397 Points ∼22% +17%
Average Mediatek Helio A25
  (329 - 376, n=3)
348 Points ∼19% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 9167, n=609)
1833 Points ∼100% +439%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Wiko View 4 Lite
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
402 Points ∼23%
Huawei Y6s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
304 Points ∼17% -24%
Alcatel 1S (2020)
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
396 Points ∼23% -1%
Motorola Moto E6s
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
464 Points ∼27% +15%
Average Mediatek Helio A25
  (387 - 442, n=3)
410 Points ∼24% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 7678, n=610)
1742 Points ∼100% +333%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Wiko View 4 Lite
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
1096 Points ∼55%
Huawei Y6s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
1017 Points ∼51% -7%
Alcatel 1S (2020)
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1014 Points ∼51% -7%
Motorola Moto E6s
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
1124 Points ∼57% +3%
Average Mediatek Helio A25
  (1045 - 1146, n=3)
1096 Points ∼55% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 5274, n=652)
1982 Points ∼100% +81%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Wiko View 4 Lite
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
694 Points ∼29%
Huawei Y6s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
403 Points ∼17% -42%
Alcatel 1S (2020)
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
678 Points ∼28% -2%
Motorola Moto E6s
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
655 Points ∼27% -6%
Average Mediatek Helio A25
  (656 - 752, n=3)
701 Points ∼29% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 13305, n=651)
2428 Points ∼100% +250%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Wiko View 4 Lite
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
756 Points ∼36%
Huawei Y6s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
465 Points ∼22% -38%
Alcatel 1S (2020)
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
732 Points ∼35% -3%
Motorola Moto E6s
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
722 Points ∼35% -4%
Average Mediatek Helio A25
  (715 - 814, n=3)
762 Points ∼37% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 9611, n=654)
2080 Points ∼100% +175%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Wiko View 4 Lite
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
14306 Points ∼92%
Alcatel 1S (2020)
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
13728 Points ∼88% -4%
Motorola Moto E6s
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
14651 Points ∼94% +2%
Average Mediatek Helio A25
 
14306 Points ∼92% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 58293, n=796)
15601 Points ∼100% +9%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Wiko View 4 Lite
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
13006 Points ∼48%
Alcatel 1S (2020)
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
12309 Points ∼45% -5%
Motorola Moto E6s
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
11220 Points ∼41% -14%
Average Mediatek Helio A25
 
13006 Points ∼48% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209431, n=794)
27343 Points ∼100% +110%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Wiko View 4 Lite
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
13274 Points ∼63%
Alcatel 1S (2020)
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
12598 Points ∼59% -5%
Motorola Moto E6s
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
11836 Points ∼56% -11%
Average Mediatek Helio A25
 
13274 Points ∼63% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 117606, n=794)
21234 Points ∼100% +60%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Wiko View 4 Lite
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
4.2 fps ∼37%
Huawei Y6s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
4.2 fps ∼37% 0%
Alcatel 1S (2020)
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
4.4 fps ∼38% +5%
Motorola Moto E6s
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
4.2 fps ∼37% 0%
Average Mediatek Helio A25
  (4.2 - 4.5, n=3)
4.33 fps ∼38% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=321)
11.5 fps ∼100% +174%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Wiko View 4 Lite
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
1.3 fps ∼16%
Huawei Y6s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
1.4 fps ∼17% +8%
Alcatel 1S (2020)
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1.3 fps ∼16% 0%
Motorola Moto E6s
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
1.4 fps ∼17% +8%
Average Mediatek Helio A25
  (1.3 - 1.4, n=3)
1.333 fps ∼16% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 101, n=319)
8.16 fps ∼100% +528%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Wiko View 4 Lite
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
6.7 fps ∼39%
Huawei Y6s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
6.9 fps ∼40% +3%
Alcatel 1S (2020)
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
7.1 fps ∼41% +6%
Motorola Moto E6s
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
6.7 fps ∼39% 0%
Average Mediatek Helio A25
  (6.7 - 7.2, n=3)
6.9 fps ∼40% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=325)
17.2 fps ∼100% +157%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Wiko View 4 Lite
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
3.7 fps ∼19%
Huawei Y6s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
3.8 fps ∼19% +3%
Alcatel 1S (2020)
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
3.7 fps ∼19% 0%
Motorola Moto E6s
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
3.8 fps ∼19% +3%
Average Mediatek Helio A25
  (3.7 - 4, n=3)
3.8 fps ∼19% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 257, n=324)
19.7 fps ∼100% +432%
Wiko View 4 LiteHuawei Y6sAlcatel 1S (2020)Motorola Moto E6sAverage 32 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
3%
3%
10%
-7%
28%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
62.57 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
60.6 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-3%
62.36 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
63.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
52.3 (3.4 - 87.1, n=169)
-16%
51.1 (1.7 - 87.1, n=536)
-18%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
81.76 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
80.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-1%
82.03 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
82.3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
71.2 (8.2 - 96.5, n=169)
-13%
69.1 (8.1 - 96.5, n=536)
-15%
Random Write 4KB
17.92
18.6
4%
20.27
13%
17.7
-1%
19.3 (0.75 - 89.5, n=212)
8%
36.9 (0.14 - 319, n=892)
106%
Random Read 4KB
46.19
46.7
1%
26.57
-42%
69.4
50%
41.2 (3.59 - 117, n=212)
-11%
60.1 (1.59 - 324, n=892)
30%
Sequential Write 256KB
121.85
118
-3%
146.02
20%
103.5
-15%
97.1 (14.8 - 189, n=212)
-20%
130 (2.99 - 911, n=892)
7%
Sequential Read 256KB
219.04
263.2
20%
273.28
25%
275
26%
239 (25.8 - 452, n=212)
9%
347 (12.1 - 1802, n=892)
58%

Temperature

Max. Load
 33.1 °C
92 F
34 °C
93 F
32.8 °C
91 F
 
 33.7 °C
93 F
33.2 °C
92 F
34 °C
93 F
 
 32.9 °C
91 F
32.9 °C
91 F
32.7 °C
91 F
 
Maximum: 34 °C = 93 F
Average: 33.3 °C = 92 F
31.7 °C
89 F
31.9 °C
89 F
34.2 °C
94 F
31.5 °C
89 F
32 °C
90 F
33.7 °C
93 F
31.5 °C
89 F
31.8 °C
89 F
33.3 °C
92 F
Maximum: 34.2 °C = 94 F
Average: 32.4 °C = 90 F
Power Supply (max.)  30.6 °C = 87 F | Room Temperature 22 °C = 72 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.3 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.2 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.9 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.


Speakers

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.834.22519.625.73123.929.34024.325.95030.532.96318.723.98020.420.610018.618.912517.518.416019.528.220019.237.225016.447.531515.25540014.251.650014.757.363013.865.180014.671.8100014.174.9125013.572.3160014.471.7200013.972.1250013.868.6315013.867.5400014.775.4500014.274.2630014.463.6800014.962100001562.41250015.1621600015.351.8SPL26.583.1N0.852.6median 14.7median 62.4Delta0.810.632.531.829.424.422.826.225.325.430.233.323.326.621.923.21922.319.619.51919.616.121.118.927.316.634.114.341.31550.215.253.814.362.914.368.814.270.714.871.714.871.914.470.714.367.214.668.614.769.614.96714.96514.665.314.86715.454.226.880.80.943.5median 14.8median 651.415.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseWiko View 4 LiteAlcatel 1S (2020)
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Wiko View 4 Lite audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 66% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 78% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Alcatel 1S (2020) audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 41% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 9.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 86% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 90% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 7% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Loudspeaker (Pink-Noise)
Audio jack (Pink-Noise)
Audio jack (THD / THD+N)

Battery life

Wiko View 4 Lite
4000 mAh
Huawei Y6s
3020 mAh
Alcatel 1S (2020)
4000 mAh
Motorola Moto E6s
3000 mAh
Average of class Smartphone
 
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing 1.3
1133
743
-34%
1226
8%
806
-29%
697 (223 - 2636, n=757)
-38%
Battery Runtime
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Chrome 81)
18h 53min

Pros

+ long battery life
+ decent voice quality
+ Dual SIM plus microSD

Cons

- mediocre speaker
- no DRM certification
- slow SoC/memory

Verdict - Good beginner with long battery life

In review: Wiko View 4 Lite. Test device provided by Wiko Germany.
In review: Wiko View 4 Lite. Test device provided by Wiko Germany.

Compared to its predecessor, Wiko View 4 Lite is only a smooth upgrade, but it can be considered a success. Due to the strong battery, it delivers very good runtimes and can also convince with a decent voice quality. The memory equipment is appropriate for its class. However, exFAT support for microSD cards would be desirable. 

The Wiko View 4 Lite convinces with a long battery life and good telephony characteristics. 

The display is quite good considering the low price and the camera is sufficient for occasional snapshots, only the ultra wide angle lens isn't really convincing. This also applies to the speaker. Moreover, security updates come only very irregularly. For this, it additionally offers full Dual-SIM support. 

Wiko View 4 Lite - 06/23/2020 v7
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
77%
Keyboard
66 / 75 → 88%
Pointing Device
83%
Connectivity
37 / 70 → 53%
Weight
90%
Battery
92%
Display
84%
Games Performance
7 / 64 → 10%
Application Performance
53 / 86 → 61%
Temperature
93%
Noise
100%
Audio
68 / 90 → 76%
Camera
50%
Average
69%
75%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Read all 1 comments / answer
static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Reviews > Wiko View 4 Lite Review - Entry-level Smartphone with Strong Battery
Daniel Schmidt, 2020-06-24 (Update: 2020-06-24)
Daniel Schmidt
Editor of the original article: Daniel Schmidt - Managing Editor Mobile - @Tellheim
Already as a little dwarf I was fascinated by my Commodore 16 and ignited my enthusiasm for computers. With my first modem I surfed the Btx and later also the World Wide Web. The latest technology trends have always fascinated me and this is especially true for mobile devices like smartphones and tablets. For Notebookcheck, I have been on the ball since 2013 and I am looking forward to the innovations that are still to come and that we will put to the acid test for you.