Wiko View Series
Processor: unknown, Mediatek Helio 20 Helio P22 MT6762, Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, Mediatek MT6739, Mediatek Mediatek Helio 20 Helio A25, Mediatek Mediatek Helio P60, Qualcomm Snapdragon 425, Qualcomm Snapdragon 430, Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 450Graphics Adapter: unknown, ARM Mali-G72 MP3, Imagination PowerVR GE8100, Imagination PowerVR GE8320, Qualcomm Adreno 308, Qualcomm Adreno 505, Qualcomm Adreno 506
Display: 5.45 inch, 5.70 inch, 5.93 inch, 5.99 inch, 6.00 inch, 6.09 inch, 6.26 inch, 6.30 inch, 6.52 inch, 6.55 inch
Weight: 0.142kg, 0.147kg, 0.153kg, 0.158kg, 0.16kg, 0.162kg, 0.164kg, 0.166kg, 0.171kg, 0.174kg, 0.178kg, 0.18kg, 0.184kg, 0.201kg
Price: 130, 140, 150, 159, 160, 169, 170, 180, 200, 260, 300 euro
Average of 199 scores (from 314 reviews)
Wiko View
A smartphone from France! Yes, the new Wiko models, Wiko View, View XL and View Prime, are being manufactured in France. We will be looking at Wiko View today. All these new models are introduced at IFA 2017. The Wiko View and the other two models are looking pretty nice. They have nice design, look sharp and, most importantly, they are cheap. Wiko is not a well known brand, but that doesn’t mean they cant provide a value smartphone, right? With the Wiko View, you get a 5.7-inch IPS screen with a resolution of 1,440 x 720 pixels; not the best in the market. Moreover, it features 3 GB of RAM, 32 GB of eMMC storage, 2900 Mah battery and a Snapdragon 425 processor with Adreno 308 graphics card. So what does this specification mean in terms of usage? The Snapdragon 425 is an entry level processor. So, you can play games of course, but do not expect to play demanding games. The system might throttle or lag while playing such games. Having said that, this might not be the attracting point of tje Wiko View. It is the cameras. It has a 13 MP rear camera and a 16 MP front camera. While shooting selfies, you get better details. But their quality is not verified yet and we did not have the chance to test it out. But samples provided looks pretty okay. Remind you that this device is totally budget friendly and not a high-end device. It provides what it can. The price/performance ratio is absolutely great. It support LTE and comes with 2 SIM slots. You get microSD slot for storage expansion. It comes with a proximity sensor, an accelerometer, an ambient light sensor, a compass, a fingerprint reader, and a gyroscope. So you do not lack too much; at least sensor-wise. One nice thing is that the fingerprint sensor is placed on the back right the under the camera. This is a questionable placement. For some it might be convenient to use it there, but for some, especially people with maybe smaller hands, can find it hard to use the sensor and activate the phone. Device is only 8.7 mm thick and weighs 160 grams. Nothing special or bad. It starts from 200 Euros. So it is definitely a budget phone. I also have to mention that it comes with Android 7.1. It is an up-to-date device in terms of operating system. Should you buy a Wiko View? Well, maybe. Totally depends on your preferences. If you are someone that just wants to be able to make calls, yeah go for it. But if you need performance, you should look for something else. But it might be hard to find an alternative in this price range. But it is totally recommendable for people who are on a tight budget but looking for a phone which takes nice pictures. Hands-on article by Ümit Yılmaz GüneşSpecifications
Notebook: Wiko ViewProcessor: Qualcomm Snapdragon 425
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 308
Display: 5.70 inch, 2:1, 1440 x 720 pixels
Weight: 0.171kg
Links: Wiko homepage
Pricecompare
Average Score:
Foreign Reviews
Source: Android Pit DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/02/2017
Source: WinFuture DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/01/2017
Source: PC Guia PT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 01/20/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Tutto Android IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/26/2017
Rating: Total score: 76% price: 80% features: 65% display: 72% mobility: 85% ergonomy: 90%
Source: HDblog.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/10/2017
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Impressive design; great built quality; good price.
Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 09/03/2017
Source: All About Phones NL→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/09/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Frandroid FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/11/2017
Rating: Total score: 60% performance: 60% display: 60% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: Erenumerique FR→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Low price; impressive design; nice display; large screen; decent hardware; good dual cameras.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/08/2017
Source: Phonandroid FR→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Elegant design; good price; nice display.
Comparison, online available, Short, Date: 09/04/2017
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Attractive design; compact size; solid workmanship.
Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 09/01/2017
Source: Antyweb PL→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Great built quality; large screen; fast fingerprint sensor; nice selfie camera. Negative: Low gaming performance; mediocre speakers.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/29/2018
Wiko View Prime
Specifications
Notebook: Wiko View PrimeProcessor: Qualcomm Snapdragon 430
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 505
Display: 5.70 inch, 2:1, 1440 x 720 pixels
Weight: 0.162kg
Links: Wiko homepage
Pricecompare
Average Score:
Foreign Reviews
Source: Inside Handy DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/23/2017
Rating: Total score: 79%
Source: Geektopia ES→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/20/2017
Rating: Total score: 78% performance: 80% display: 75% mobility: 75% workmanship: 80%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/05/2018
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 70% features: 75% display: 75% mobility: 75% workmanship: 75% ergonomy: 75%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/28/2017
Rating: Total score: 69% price: 65% display: 69% mobility: 88% workmanship: 72%
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Impressive design; great built quality; good price.
Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 09/03/2017
Source: Nieuwe Mobiel.nl NL→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/08/2018
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/22/2018
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Frandroid FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/28/2017
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 70% display: 50% mobility: 70% workmanship: 70%
Source: Phonandroid FR→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Elegant design; good price; nice display.
Comparison, online available, Short, Date: 09/04/2017
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Attractive design; compact size; solid workmanship.
Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 09/01/2017
Source: Antyweb PL→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/26/2018
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Tabletowo PL→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/31/2018
Rating: Total score: 81% performance: 90% display: 85% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90%
Wiko View XL
Specifications
Notebook: Wiko View XLProcessor: Qualcomm Snapdragon 425
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 308
Display: 5.99 inch, 2:1, 1440 x 720 pixels
Weight: 0.171kg
Links: Wiko homepage
Pricecompare
Average Score:
Foreign Reviews
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/08/2018
Rating: Total score: 75% performance: 60% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: Phonandroid FR→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Elegant design; good price; nice display.
Comparison, online available, Short, Date: 09/04/2017
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Attractive design; compact size; solid workmanship.
Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 09/01/2017
Wiko View 2
Specifications
Notebook: Wiko View 2Processor: Qualcomm Snapdragon 435
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 505
Display: 6.00 inch, 19:9, 1528 x 720 pixels
Weight: 0.153kg
Links: Wiko homepage
Pricecompare
Average Score:
Foreign Reviews
Source: PCtipp.ch DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/27/2018
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Android Pit DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/06/2018
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Netzwelt DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/02/2018
Rating: Total score: 70% features: 80% mobility: 60% workmanship: 90%
Source: Geektopia ES→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/12/2018
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 70% display: 75% mobility: 95% workmanship: 75%
Source: Tuexperto ES→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Impressive display; long battery life; nice selfie camera. Negative: Poor display.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/11/2018
Source: El chapuzas Informatico ES→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Attractive design; great built quality; nice display; large screen; high performance; excellent cameras. Negative: Relatively high price; short battery life.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/25/2018
Source: El Androide Libre ES→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Low price; nice display; good selfie camera.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/17/2018
Source: PC Guia PT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 11/24/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Pplware PT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/20/2018
Rating: Total score: 78% performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/27/2018
Rating: Total score: 71% price: 75% features: 70% display: 75% mobility: 75% workmanship: 75% ergonomy: 75%
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/02/2018
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 70% features: 80% display: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: InstaNews IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Modern design; good price. Negative: Poor display; mediocre speakers.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/20/2018
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Attractive design; nice display; high performance.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 05/25/2018
Source: Tablets Magazine NL→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/18/2018
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: All About Phones NL→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/27/2018
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: All About Phones NL→EN Archive.org version
Comparison, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/06/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: AndroidWorld.nl NL→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Nice display; face ID; good cameras; long battery life. Negative: Weak processor.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/27/2018
Source: Consumentenbond NL→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; decent hardware; face ID. Negative: Poor cameras; poor display.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/14/2018
Source: CNet France FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/01/2018
Rating: Total score: 61%
Source: Les Mobiles FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/01/2018
Rating: Total score: 66%
Source: Phonandroid FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/14/2018
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Top for Phone FR→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Low price; nice screen; fast system. Negative: Short battery life.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/19/2018
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Low price; attractive design; nice display; decent performance.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/28/2018
Source: Tabletowo PL→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/05/2018
Rating: Total score: 69% performance: 60% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 75%
Wiko View 2 Pro
Specifications
Notebook: Wiko View 2 ProProcessor: Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 450
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 506
Display: 6.00 inch, 19:9, 1528 x 720 pixels
Weight: 0.164kg
Price: 300 euro
Links: Wiko homepage
Pricecompare
Average Score:
Reviews
Smartphone from the Mediterranean. From the sunny city of Marseille...the View 2 Pro, created by the French manufacturer Wiko, has found its way to our workbench. What makes the smartphone, priced at 300 Euros (~$350), stand out from other devices in its class? Read our review to find out.
Foreign Reviews
Source: Blick DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/24/2018
Source: Blick DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/24/2018
Source: Tech Stage DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/02/2018
Source: Tech Stage DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/02/2018
Source: Game IT ES→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; great display; compact size.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/23/2018
Source: Game IT ES→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; great display; compact size.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/23/2018
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/08/2018
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 70% features: 80% display: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/08/2018
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 70% features: 80% display: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Androidiani IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/31/2018
Rating: Total score: 70% features: 75% display: 65% mobility: 80% workmanship: 75% ergonomy: 70%
Source: Androidiani IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/31/2018
Rating: Total score: 70% features: 75% display: 65% mobility: 80% workmanship: 75% ergonomy: 70%
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/03/2018
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/03/2018
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Everyeye.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/27/2018
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Everyeye.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/27/2018
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Techzilla.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/26/2018
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 70% display: 60% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: Techzilla.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/26/2018
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 70% display: 60% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: HDblog.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/20/2018
Rating: Total score: 72% price: 60% features: 76%
Source: HDblog.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/20/2018
Rating: Total score: 72% price: 60% features: 76%
Source: Tutto Android IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/02/2018
Rating: Total score: 73% price: 70% features: 70% display: 75% mobility: 85% ergonomy: 77%
Source: Tutto Android IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/02/2018
Rating: Total score: 73% price: 70% features: 70% display: 75% mobility: 85% ergonomy: 77%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/31/2018
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 70% display: 70% mobility: 84% workmanship: 88%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/31/2018
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 70% display: 70% mobility: 84% workmanship: 88%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/28/2018
Rating: Total score: 75% price: 75% features: 75% display: 75% mobility: 75% workmanship: 75% ergonomy: 75%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/28/2018
Rating: Total score: 75% price: 75% features: 75% display: 75% mobility: 75% workmanship: 75% ergonomy: 75%
Source: Chimera Revo IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; nice cameras. Negative: Average performance; short battery life.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/04/2019
Source: Chimera Revo IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; nice cameras. Negative: Average performance; short battery life.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/04/2019
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Low price; decent processor.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/28/2018
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Low price; decent processor.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/28/2018
Source: Tecno Cino IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Pleasant design; solid workmanship; nice display; good price; decent cameras. Negative: Only microUSB port; inflexible fingerprint sensor.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/05/2018
Source: Tecno Cino IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Pleasant design; solid workmanship; nice display; good price; decent cameras. Negative: Only microUSB port; inflexible fingerprint sensor.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/05/2018
Source: Leonardo.it Tech IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; decent cameras; powerful processor; beautiful design.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/04/2018
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Large screen; nice display; powerful hardware; excellent cameras; elegant design; metal case.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/04/2018
Source: Leonardo.it Tech IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; decent cameras; powerful processor; beautiful design.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/04/2018
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Large screen; nice display; powerful hardware; excellent cameras; elegant design; metal case.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/04/2018
Source: Panorama IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; nice display.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 06/11/2018
Source: Panorama IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; nice display.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 06/11/2018
Source: All About Phones NL→EN Archive.org version
Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 03/06/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: All About Phones NL→EN Archive.org version
Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 03/06/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Fredzone FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/22/2018
Rating: Total score: 73% price: 70% display: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 70% ergonomy: 70%
Source: Fredzone FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/22/2018
Rating: Total score: 73% price: 70% display: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 70% ergonomy: 70%
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/20/2018
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/20/2018
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Frandroid FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/10/2018
Rating: Total score: 60% performance: 60% display: 70% mobility: 60% workmanship: 70%
Source: Frandroid FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/10/2018
Rating: Total score: 60% performance: 60% display: 70% mobility: 60% workmanship: 70%
Source: Top for Phone FR→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Impressive display; nice cameras; decent hardware. Negative: Relatively high price; low autonomy.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/22/2018
Source: Top for Phone FR→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Impressive display; nice cameras; decent hardware. Negative: Relatively high price; low autonomy.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/22/2018
Source: Fredzone FR→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Compact size; nice design; good built quality. Negative: Plastic case.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/20/2018
Source: Fredzone FR→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Compact size; nice design; good built quality. Negative: Plastic case.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/20/2018
Source: Tabletowo PL→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Decent cameras; fast fingerprint sensor; face ID; long battery life; support dual SIM; decent hardware. Negative: Poor display; mediocre speakers.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/05/2018
Source: Tabletowo PL→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Decent cameras; fast fingerprint sensor; face ID; long battery life; support dual SIM; decent hardware. Negative: Poor display; mediocre speakers.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/05/2018
Wiko View Max
Launched in July 2018, the Wiko View Max is quickly gaining the attention of mobile phone users worldwide. With its economical price, native features and more-than-adequate hardware specifications, it is easy to see why. The latest model of Wiko's extended line of smartphones, the View Max is the French company's largest phone to date. It comes with a 5.99-inch display with an IPS HD+ resolution of 1440 x 720 pixels. The widescreen 18:9 format allows the users to view more of the screen and pretty much guarantee a much larger surface area for a more significant visual experience while maintaining its relatively compact size. It's always nice to see a screen that almost fills out the entire front of the device. Under the bonnet, the Wiko View Max runs on a Quad-Core MediaTek MT6739WA processor, complemented with 3 GB of RAM and built-in 32 GB of internal storage. The generous 3 GB of RAM makes the phone very well suited for multitasking with running two apps at the same time. It is by no means a giant, in terms of hardware specifications, but it is indeed more than enough for the average user. There is also the option to add storage, up to 128 GB, with a microSD card. Like most modern smartphones in the market, the Wiko View Max comes with front and rear cameras. Its front camera has an 8 MP sensor with a 'selfie' LED flash that makes taking selfies in a low light condition an easy feat. Even though the back camera has an underwhelming 13 MP sensor, it shoots in high-resolution and in crisp colors. Making use of the front camera, the View Max also comes with a facial recognition feature called the Face Unlock. Connectivity-wise, this dual-sim 4G LTE phone also has Bluetooth 4.2, Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, the usual 3.5 mm audio jack and a fingerprint reader at the back of the phone. Surprisingly, this phone also comes with a native FM radio chip, a feature that most phone manufacturers have done away with. The phone is also powered by a massive 4000 mAh battery that offers up to 42 hours of talk time. As for the operating system, the View Max runs on Android 8.0 Oreo out-of-the-box. The Wiko View Max is an excellent buy for its price, especially with its generous features and hardware specifications. However, the phone is far from perfect. The phone only comes with an HD resolution and not the current market-norm Full HD resolution. The lack of Full HD resolution may be the deal-breaker for a lot of mobile phone users, especially those who spend a great deal of time watching videos on their phones. The View Max comes in 2 colors - matte gold and glossy black. Hands-on article by Jagadisa RajarathnamSpecifications
Notebook: Wiko View MaxProcessor: Mediatek MT6739
Graphics Adapter: Imagination PowerVR GE8100
Display: 5.99 inch, 18:9, 1440 x 720 pixels
Weight: 0.158kg
Price: 170 euro
Links: Wiko homepage
Pricecompare
Reviews
For fans of bigger smartphones, Wiko has the 6-inch device View Max on offer. Featuring mid-range technology and the modern Android 8.1 operating system, it should satisfy most demands customers could make on a current phone. In our review, we determine what buyers can expect from the Wiko View Max.
Wiko View Go
The Wiko View Go smartphone was unveiled during the 2018 Mobile World Congress. For an entry-level phone in the View Series, the View Go packs quite a punch under its hood. First, let's take a look at its hardware specifications. The View Go runs with a 1.3 GHz MT6739 MediaTek processor. It also has 2 GB of RAM and 16 GB of internal storage. If 16 GB is not enough to store your data, you can expand the storage by up to 128 GB with its microSD card slot. As for the battery, the View Go comes with a generous 3000 mAh battery with 16-hour standby time. The View Go also comes with a fairly large HD+ 5.7" screen with 1440 x 720 resolution. The immersive 18:9 widescreen format display lets you see more on the screen, from binge-watching Netflix videos to scrolling Instagram photos. Even though this is an entry-level phone, the visuals are bright and clear on the sizeable HD+ display. As with the norm with most of the smartphones in the market, the View Go comes with two cameras. The rear camera has a 13 MP sensor, with a 4x digital zoom on an autofocus lens. For the selfie-lovers, View Go's front camera has a 5 MP sensor and a flash for low light conditions. For connectivity, the usual suspects come built-in with the Wiko View Go. The smartphone has the options to run on either the 3G or the 4G network. Other than that, it has a dual SIM slot, Bluetooth 4.2, WiFi, a micro USB port, a 3.5 mm audio out and a microSD card slot. Wiko took a few steps further with the View Go. Not only does the phone runs on the latest Android Oreo, but it also comes with Face Unlock technology, which enables you to access your phone in an instant, a feature that always seemed to be missing from entry-level phones. View Go is also optimized to multitask so you can smoothly run two apps at the same time. Made for users who prefer one-handed use of their phones, the View Go's compact build ensures that the phone is a snug fit in their palm. The View Go's build measures precisely 152.5 x 72.6 x 8.3 mm and weighs only 142 grams. The phone also comes in 3 colors - black, gold, and grey. It is easy to see why the online communities rave about this entry-level phone; for its small price, Wiko's View Go is undoubtedly the bang-for-buck choice for many. For a fraction of the price of a mainstream brand's flagship model, you get a decent phone with many of their similar features. Hands-on article by Jagadisa RajarathnamSpecifications
Notebook: Wiko View GoProcessor: Mediatek MT6739
Graphics Adapter: Imagination PowerVR GE8100
Display: 5.70 inch, 18:9, 1440 x 720 pixels
Weight: 0.142kg
Price: 140 euro
Links: Wiko homepage
Pricecompare
Average Score:
Reviews
The Wiko View Go is another entry-level smartphone at a competitive price, with which the French manufacturer also covers the last range of affordable phones. In our review we show what you can expect for about 140 Euros (~$163).
Foreign Reviews
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/05/2018
Rating: Total score: 68% performance: 40% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/05/2018
Rating: Total score: 68% performance: 40% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Wiko View Lite
Specifications
Notebook: Wiko View LiteProcessor: Mediatek MT6739
Graphics Adapter: Imagination PowerVR GE8100
Display: 5.45 inch, 18:9, 1440 x 720 pixels
Weight: 0.147kg
Price: 160 euro
Links: Wiko homepage
Pricecompare
Reviews
The Wiko View Lite features an ergonomic design and is well-suited for small hands, thanks to its small size. In this review, we examine the performance of the View Lite and compare it to the competition.
Wiko View 2 Plus
Specifications
Notebook: Wiko View 2 PlusProcessor: Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 450
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 506
Display: 5.93 inch, 19:9, 1512 x 720 pixels
Weight: 0.166kg
Price: 260 euro
Links: Wiko homepage
Pricecompare
Average Score:
Reviews
The Wiko View 2 Plus picks up on many of last year’s smartphone trends and combines them in an affordable package. The View 2 Plus integrates a dual rear-facing camera system and a large battery among other things, but its imposing notch may put off some potential buyers.
Foreign Reviews
Source: El Androide Libre ES→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Beautiful design; nice performance; long battery life.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/12/2018
Source: El Androide Libre ES→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Beautiful design; nice performance; long battery life.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/12/2018
Source: PC Guia PT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 02/10/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: PC Guia PT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 02/10/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/13/2018
Rating: Total score: 73% price: 65% features: 70% display: 70% mobility: 85% workmanship: 75% ergonomy: 75%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/13/2018
Rating: Total score: 73% price: 65% features: 70% display: 70% mobility: 85% workmanship: 75% ergonomy: 75%
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/27/2018
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/27/2018
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Panorama IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Nice design; great built quality; attractive price; decent cameras.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/16/2018
Source: Panorama IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Nice design; great built quality; attractive price; decent cameras.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/16/2018
Source: HDblog.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; long battery life; nice design; good display. Negative: Only microUSB; no NFC.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/07/2018
Source: HDblog.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; long battery life; nice design; good display. Negative: Only microUSB; no NFC.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/07/2018
Source: Tablets Magazine NL→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/12/2018
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Tablets Magazine NL→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/12/2018
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: AndroidWorld.nl NL→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/11/2018
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: AndroidWorld.nl NL→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/11/2018
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Computer Totaal NL→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/10/2018
Rating: Total score: 62%
Source: Computer Totaal NL→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/10/2018
Rating: Total score: 62%
Source: 01Net FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/26/2018
Rating: Total score: 76% performance: 50% mobility: 100%
Source: 01Net FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/26/2018
Rating: Total score: 76% performance: 50% mobility: 100%
Source: Frandroid FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/01/2018
Rating: Total score: 50% performance: 40% display: 60% mobility: 70% workmanship: 40%
Source: Frandroid FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/01/2018
Rating: Total score: 50% performance: 40% display: 60% mobility: 70% workmanship: 40%
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/14/2018
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/14/2018
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Top for Phone FR→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Attractive price; nice design; high performance; great cameras; decent autonomy. Negative: No NFC chip; poor display.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/23/2019
Source: Top for Phone FR→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Attractive price; nice design; high performance; great cameras; decent autonomy. Negative: No NFC chip; poor display.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/23/2019
Wiko View 2 Go
Specifications
Notebook: Wiko View 2 GoProcessor: Qualcomm Snapdragon 430
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 505
Display: 5.93 inch, 19:9, 1512 x 720 pixels
Weight: 0.16kg
Price: 159 euro
Links: Wiko homepage
Pricecompare
Average Score:
Reviews
Who needs a fingerprint scanner? The Wiko View 2 Go relies on facial recognition and traditional security methods instead. Read on to find out what other compromises Wiko has made to cut costs and how the View 2 Go stands up to other budget smartphones.
Foreign Reviews
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/28/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% features: 70% display: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/28/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% features: 70% display: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/07/2019
Rating: Total score: 75% price: 75% features: 75% display: 75% mobility: 80% workmanship: 75% ergonomy: 75%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/07/2019
Rating: Total score: 75% price: 75% features: 75% display: 75% mobility: 80% workmanship: 75% ergonomy: 75%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 12/22/2018
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 80% display: 75% mobility: 90% workmanship: 65%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 12/22/2018
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 80% display: 75% mobility: 90% workmanship: 65%
Source: Techzilla.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/23/2018
Rating: Total score: 67% price: 65% display: 60% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: Techzilla.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/23/2018
Rating: Total score: 67% price: 65% display: 60% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/08/2018
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/08/2018
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Everyeye.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/24/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Everyeye.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/24/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Big screen; nice display; powerful processor; elegant design; long battery life.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/26/2019
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Big screen; nice display; powerful processor; elegant design; long battery life.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/26/2019
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/22/2018
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/22/2018
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Top for Phone FR→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Beautiful design; low price; high autonomy; fast system. Negative: No fingerprint sensor; no NFC chip.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/19/2019
Source: Top for Phone FR→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Beautiful design; low price; high autonomy; fast system. Negative: No fingerprint sensor; no NFC chip.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/19/2019
Source: Clubic FR→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Low price; nice performance; long battery life.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/27/2018
Source: Clubic FR→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Low price; nice performance; long battery life.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/27/2018
Wiko View 3 Pro
Specifications
Notebook: Wiko View 3 ProProcessor: Mediatek Mediatek Helio P60
Graphics Adapter: ARM Mali-G72 MP3
Display: 6.30 inch, 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.184kg
Price: 300 euro
Links: Wiko homepage
Pricecompare
Average Score:
Reviews
Wiko is trying to significantly lower the price limit for smartphones with a triple-camera setup. At the same time, it is relying on many AI functions, a large amount of storage and an attractive design. In our review we will reveal what else the Wiko View 3 Pro offers for around 300 Euros (~$338).
Source: DxOMark Archive.org version
The Wiko View 3 Pro offers an impressive-looking spec sheet at a budget price point, but unfortunately, at least for the camera, this does not translate into an impressive performance, thus the View 3 Pro achieves one of the lowest camera scores among all the devices we have tested so far. It’s capable of recording acceptable photos and videos in ideal conditions, but in more challenging situations the camera struggles. Overall, there is quite a bit of room for improvement in all areas, making the Wiko hard to recommend to anyone who values camera performance on their smartphone—and that’s true even considering the attractive price point.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/31/2019
Source: DxOMark Archive.org version
The Wiko View 3 Pro offers an impressive-looking spec sheet at a budget price point, but unfortunately, at least for the camera, this does not translate into an impressive performance, thus the View 3 Pro achieves one of the lowest camera scores among all the devices we have tested so far. It’s capable of recording acceptable photos and videos in ideal conditions, but in more challenging situations the camera struggles. Overall, there is quite a bit of room for improvement in all areas, making the Wiko hard to recommend to anyone who values camera performance on their smartphone—and that’s true even considering the attractive price point.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/31/2019
Foreign Reviews
Source: Chip.de DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/09/2019
Rating: Total score: 79% performance: 82% features: 74% display: 80% mobility: 92%
Source: Chip.de DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/09/2019
Rating: Total score: 79% performance: 82% features: 74% display: 80% mobility: 92%
Source: Connect - 8/19
Single Review, , Medium, Date: 07/01/2019
Rating: Total score: 77% features: 70% mobility: 98% ergonomy: 69%
Source: Connect - 8/19
Single Review, , Medium, Date: 07/01/2019
Rating: Total score: 77% features: 70% mobility: 98% ergonomy: 69%
Source: Android Pit DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/02/2019
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Android Pit DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/02/2019
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Tech Stage DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/06/2019
Source: Tech Stage DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/06/2019
Source: Teltarif DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/05/2019
Rating: Total score: 90% display: 70% mobility: 90% workmanship: 90%
Source: Teltarif DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/05/2019
Rating: Total score: 90% display: 70% mobility: 90% workmanship: 90%
Source: WinFuture DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/28/2019
Source: WinFuture DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/28/2019
Source: Inside Handy DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/27/2019
Source: Inside Handy DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/27/2019
Source: Curved DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/26/2019
Source: Curved DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/26/2019
Source: MuyComputer ES→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/03/2019
Rating: Total score: 81% performance: 85% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 75%
Source: MuyComputer ES→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/03/2019
Rating: Total score: 81% performance: 85% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 75%
Source: Computerhoy ES→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/06/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% features: 80% display: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Computerhoy ES→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/06/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% features: 80% display: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Andro 4 All ES→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/22/2019
Rating: Total score: 71%
Source: Andro 4 All ES→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/22/2019
Rating: Total score: 71%
Source: Zona Movilidad ES→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Attractive design; powerful hardware; high performance; good price.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 10/11/2019
Source: Zona Movilidad ES→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Attractive design; powerful hardware; high performance; good price.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 10/11/2019
Source: El Androide Libre ES→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Decent hardware; nice design; great built quality.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/22/2019
Source: El Androide Libre ES→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Decent hardware; nice design; great built quality.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/22/2019
Source: PC Guia PT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/11/2019
Rating: Total score: 71% price: 80%
Source: PC Guia PT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/11/2019
Rating: Total score: 71% price: 80%
Source: Android Geek PT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Great autonomy; nice design; high performance. Negative: Poor cameras; high price; bulky.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/07/2019
Source: Android Geek PT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Great autonomy; nice design; high performance. Negative: Poor cameras; high price; bulky.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/07/2019
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/19/2019
Rating: Total score: 74% price: 75% features: 75% display: 80% mobility: 75% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/19/2019
Rating: Total score: 74% price: 75% features: 75% display: 80% mobility: 75% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: HDblog.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/01/2019
Rating: price: 59% features: 79%
Source: HDblog.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/01/2019
Rating: price: 59% features: 79%
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/26/2019
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/26/2019
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: CNet France FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/19/2019
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: CNet France FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/19/2019
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Frandroid FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/29/2019
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: Frandroid FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/29/2019
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/30/2019
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/30/2019
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Top for Phone FR→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Beautiful design; nice cameras; long battery life.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/10/2019
Source: Top for Phone FR→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Beautiful design; nice cameras; long battery life.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/10/2019
Source: Phonandroid FR→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; nice design; great display; long battery life.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/26/2019
Source: Phonandroid FR→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; nice design; great display; long battery life.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/26/2019
Wiko View 3
The Wiko View 3 is a mid-range smartphone that features a triple camera with super wide angle, large memory and long-lasting battery life. Users can discover an elegant classy design with this smartphone. The smartphone features a glass-like back cover and glossy mirror frame, with deep reflections and an elegant gradient effect. Users can choose between three brand-new gradient colors, namely Night Blue, Blush Gold and Electro Bleen. The smart triple camera has it all. It has a Sony IMX486 camera sensor with 12 MP and 1.25 µm pixel size, which will allow capturing astonishing, colorful and sharp shots even in low light condition, a 13 MP Super Wide Angle to widen vision up to 120°, and a 2 MP Bokeh lens to reveal artistic soul with the blur mode. Besides that, with the View 3’s AI 8 MP front camera, users can look at their beautiful self in every situation. The high quality 13 MP Super Wide Angle sensor will enable users to capture sharp and detailed 120°shots. Without stepping back, users will easily immortalize massive landscapes, or make large group pictures with everybody in the frame. The View 3 AI-powered camera takes care of everything for users. It analyses the environment, adjusts the settings and optimizes the picture. As for storage, with 32 GB ROM, there is always space for favorite games, music and movies. Users can also appreciate a smooth multitasking experience with 3 GB of RAM. Furthermore, users can expand storage by up to 256 GB with a micro SD card. The performance is provided by an MediaTek Helio P22 octa core processor with 3 GB RAM. The battery won’t let users down with 4,000 mAh. They can enjoy two days use with one charge, validated by Smartviser. The 12 nm processor technology helps to reduce power consumption by up to 15 % (vs 14 nm processors). Users can unlock their phone with face recognition in just one look with AI Face Unlock. It has faster recognition and more safety. The enhanced full screen, with 88 % display-to-body ratio and smaller notch, allows users to enjoy more useful space on the display for maximum immersion. The screen also features an ultra-resistant layer of protection to preserve the touchscreen sensitivity with anti-fingerprint coating. Besides that, it also features a smart minimalist window with a hard frame to protect the phone from everyday harm. The reflective patch provides better visibility at night while looking trendy. As a conclusion, the Wiko View 3 is one of the most affordable triple-camera smartphones. Although it is a budget smartphone, it stills deliver good performance, which can satisfy most of the normal smartphone users. Users who wanted an affordable smartphone with a good camera can definitely consider this model. Hands-on article by Jagadisa RajarathnamSpecifications
Notebook: Wiko View 3Processor: Mediatek Helio 20 Helio P22 MT6762
Graphics Adapter: Imagination PowerVR GE8320
Display: 6.26 inch, 19:9, 1520 x 720 pixels
Weight: 0.178kg
Price: 180 euro
Links: Wiko homepage
Pricecompare
Average Score:
Reviews
According to Wiko, the View 3 is the first smartphone with a triple camera in the price range below 200 Euros (~$223). Find out in our review of the Wiko smartphone whether the endurance champion of the View 3 series deserves a recommendation.
Foreign Reviews
Source: Chip.de DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/30/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 85% features: 82% display: 85% mobility: 98%
Source: Chip.de DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/30/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 85% features: 82% display: 85% mobility: 98%
Source: Netzwelt DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/28/2019
Source: Netzwelt DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/28/2019
Source: Tech Stage DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/15/2019
Source: Tech Stage DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/15/2019
Source: Geektopia ES→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/03/2020
Rating: Total score: 77% performance: 70% display: 75% workmanship: 75%
Source: Geektopia ES→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/03/2020
Rating: Total score: 77% performance: 70% display: 75% workmanship: 75%
Source: Techzilla.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/04/2019
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 80% display: 65% mobility: 90% workmanship: 65%
Source: Techzilla.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/04/2019
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 80% display: 65% mobility: 90% workmanship: 65%
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/27/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% features: 70% display: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/27/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% features: 70% display: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/30/2019
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/30/2019
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Everyeye.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/02/2019
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Everyeye.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/02/2019
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/27/2019
Rating: Total score: 75% price: 75% features: 75% display: 70% mobility: 85% workmanship: 75% ergonomy: 75%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/27/2019
Rating: Total score: 75% price: 75% features: 75% display: 70% mobility: 85% workmanship: 75% ergonomy: 75%
Source: Chimera Revo IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; nice design; great built quality; decent hardware.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/15/2019
Source: Chimera Revo IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; nice design; great built quality; decent hardware.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/15/2019
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Large battery capacity; nice display; beautiful design; attractive price.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/01/2019
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Large battery capacity; nice display; beautiful design; attractive price.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/01/2019
Source: Computer Totaal NL→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/27/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Computer Totaal NL→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/27/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/30/2019
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/30/2019
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Frandroid FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/07/2019
Rating: Total score: 60% performance: 50% display: 70% mobility: 90% workmanship: 70%
Source: Frandroid FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/07/2019
Rating: Total score: 60% performance: 50% display: 70% mobility: 90% workmanship: 70%
Source: Top for Phone FR→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Stylish design; fast system; decent hardware; long battery life. Negative: Relatively high price.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/30/2019
Source: Top for Phone FR→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Stylish design; fast system; decent hardware; long battery life. Negative: Relatively high price.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/30/2019
Wiko View 3 Lite
Specifications
Notebook: Wiko View 3 LiteProcessor: unknown
Graphics Adapter: unknown
Display: 6.09 inch, 18:9, 1520 x 720 pixels
Weight: 0.16kg
Price: 150 euro
Links: Wiko homepage
Pricecompare
Average Score:
Foreign Reviews
Source: Teltarif DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/27/2019
Rating: Total score: 81% price: 100% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 90%
Source: Geektopia ES→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/21/2019
Rating: Total score: 72% performance: 60% display: 75% mobility: 90% workmanship: 70%
Source: PC Guia PT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 09/22/2019
Rating: Total score: 66% price: 80%
Source: Android Geek PT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: High autonomy; great built quality; attractive price. Negative: Average performance; weak hardware.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/09/2019
Source: HDblog.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Beautiful design; great built quality; long battery life; good price.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/09/2019
Source: Top for Phone FR→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Decent hardware; nice cameras. Negative: Average performance.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/02/2019
Source: Danviet VN→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Low price; long battery life; premium design; solid workmanship.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/05/2019
Source: Zing VN→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Low price; premium design; great built quality; nice performance.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/04/2019
Source: Viettelstore VN→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Frameless design; high performance; nice dual cameras; low price.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 05/29/2019
Wiko View 4
Specifications
Notebook: Wiko View 4Processor: Mediatek Mediatek Helio 20 Helio A25
Graphics Adapter: Imagination PowerVR GE8320
Display: 6.52 inch, 20:9, 1600 x 720 pixels
Weight: 0.18kg
Price: 169 euro
Links: Wiko homepage
Pricecompare
Average Score:
Reviews
With an unusual appearance, Wiko View 4 tries to convince its buyers, but the inner values remain rather modest. Whether the smartphone with a French design can still convince, you can find out in the review.
Foreign Reviews
Source: WinFuture DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/07/2020
Source: WinFuture DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/07/2020
Source: Android Pit DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/13/2020
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Android Pit DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/13/2020
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Zona Movilidad ES→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/01/2020
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Zona Movilidad ES→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/01/2020
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Computerhoy ES→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/14/2020
Rating: Total score: 74% features: 60% display: 70% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Computerhoy ES→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/14/2020
Rating: Total score: 74% features: 60% display: 70% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: MuyComputer ES→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/21/2020
Rating: Total score: 62% performance: 60% display: 60% mobility: 100% workmanship: 40%
Source: MuyComputer ES→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/21/2020
Rating: Total score: 62% performance: 60% display: 60% mobility: 100% workmanship: 40%
Source: Android Geek PT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/26/2020
Rating: Total score: 55% performance: 56% workmanship: 60%
Source: Android Geek PT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/26/2020
Rating: Total score: 55% performance: 56% workmanship: 60%
Source: PC Guia PT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/09/2020
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 90%
Source: PC Guia PT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/09/2020
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 90%
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/27/2020
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 90% features: 70% display: 70% mobility: 100% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/27/2020
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 90% features: 70% display: 70% mobility: 100% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/09/2020
Rating: Total score: 75% price: 75% features: 70% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 65% ergonomy: 65%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/09/2020
Rating: Total score: 75% price: 75% features: 70% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 65% ergonomy: 65%
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Premium design; metal case; solid workmanship; powerful hardware; high performance; large battery capacity.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/13/2020
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Premium design; metal case; solid workmanship; powerful hardware; high performance; large battery capacity.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/13/2020
Source: Frandroid FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/26/2020
Rating: Total score: 50% performance: 30% display: 60% mobility: 90% workmanship: 60%
Source: Frandroid FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/26/2020
Rating: Total score: 50% performance: 30% display: 60% mobility: 90% workmanship: 60%
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/07/2020
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/07/2020
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Frandroid FR→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Powerful hardware; high performance; premium design; metal case; solid workmanship; nice cameras.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/20/2020
Source: Frandroid FR→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Powerful hardware; high performance; premium design; metal case; solid workmanship; nice cameras.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/20/2020
Wiko View 4 Lite
Specifications
Notebook: Wiko View 4 LiteProcessor: Mediatek Mediatek Helio 20 Helio A25
Graphics Adapter: Imagination PowerVR GE8320
Display: 6.52 inch, 20:9, 1600 x 720 pixels
Weight: 0.174kg
Price: 130 euro
Links: Wiko homepage
Pricecompare
Average Score:
Reviews
With the View 4 Lite, Wiko polishes up the entry-level model of its mid-range series. While many specifications are rather class-typical, especially the triple camera and the strong battery stand out from the crowd.
Foreign Reviews
Source: Techtest.org DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/12/2020
Source: Techtest.org DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/12/2020
Source: Geektopia ES→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/22/2020
Rating: Total score: 74% performance: 70% display: 75% mobility: 90% workmanship: 70%
Source: Geektopia ES→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/22/2020
Rating: Total score: 74% performance: 70% display: 75% mobility: 90% workmanship: 70%
Source: Android Geek PT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/28/2020
Rating: Total score: 54% performance: 40% display: 50% mobility: 80% workmanship: 60%
Source: Android Geek PT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/28/2020
Rating: Total score: 54% performance: 40% display: 50% mobility: 80% workmanship: 60%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/29/2020
Rating: Total score: 72% price: 70% features: 70% display: 80% mobility: 75% workmanship: 70% ergonomy: 70%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/29/2020
Rating: Total score: 72% price: 70% features: 70% display: 80% mobility: 75% workmanship: 70% ergonomy: 70%
Source: Chimera Revo IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/28/2020
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Chimera Revo IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/28/2020
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Low price; big screen; nice display; great cameras; large battery capacity.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/15/2020
Source: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Low price; big screen; nice display; great cameras; large battery capacity.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/15/2020
Source: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Low price; decent autonomy; nice dual AI cameras; good hardware; modern design; thin frames.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/13/2020
Source: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Low price; decent autonomy; nice dual AI cameras; good hardware; modern design; thin frames.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/13/2020
Wiko View5
Specifications
Notebook: Wiko View5Processor: Mediatek Mediatek Helio 20 Helio A25
Graphics Adapter: Imagination PowerVR GE8320
Display: 6.55 inch, 20:9, 1600 x 720 pixels
Weight: 0.201kg
Price: 170 euro
Links: Wiko homepage
Pricecompare
Average Score:
Reviews
With the View 5's "infinite" battery life, users of the entry-level smartphone should be particularly independent, according to Wiko. The AI paired with a 5,000-mAh battery is responsible for this. You can find out here whether it is worth buying the Wiko smartphone.
Foreign Reviews
Source: Techtest.org DE→EN
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/29/2021
Source: Techtest.org DE→EN
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/29/2021
Source: Computerbild DE→EN
Positive: Large and bright display; nice cameras; long battery life; support dual SIM. Negative: Weak processor.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/08/2021
Source: Computerbild DE→EN
Positive: Large and bright display; nice cameras; long battery life; support dual SIM. Negative: Weak processor.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/08/2021
Source: Geektopia ES→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/27/2020
Rating: Total score: 77% performance: 70% display: 75% mobility: 95% workmanship: 70%
Source: Geektopia ES→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/27/2020
Rating: Total score: 77% performance: 70% display: 75% mobility: 95% workmanship: 70%
Source: Notebook Italia IT→EN
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/01/2021
Rating: Total score: 72% price: 80% performance: 70% workmanship: 75%
Source: Notebook Italia IT→EN
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/01/2021
Rating: Total score: 72% price: 80% performance: 70% workmanship: 75%
Source: HDblog.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/30/2020
Rating: price: 57% features: 59%
Source: HDblog.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/30/2020
Rating: price: 57% features: 59%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/25/2020
Rating: Total score: 74% price: 75% features: 65% mobility: 90% workmanship: 70% ergonomy: 70%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/25/2020
Rating: Total score: 74% price: 75% features: 65% mobility: 90% workmanship: 70% ergonomy: 70%
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Long battery life; decent hardware; nice cameras.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/16/2020
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Long battery life; decent hardware; nice cameras.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/16/2020
Source: Batista70Phone IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Long battery life; nice cameras; elegant design; great built quality; good price.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/08/2020
Source: Batista70Phone IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Long battery life; nice cameras; elegant design; great built quality; good price.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/08/2020
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Big screen; powerful hardware; high performance; beautiful design; nice cameras.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/26/2020
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Big screen; powerful hardware; high performance; beautiful design; nice cameras.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/26/2020
Wiko View5 Plus
Specifications
Notebook: Wiko View5 PlusProcessor: Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
Graphics Adapter: Imagination PowerVR GE8320
Display: 6.55 inch, 20:9, 1600 x 720 pixels
Weight: 0.201kg
Price: 200 euro
Links: Wiko homepage
Pricecompare
Average Score:
Reviews
Compared with its smaller brother, the Wiko View5 Plus has a stronger processor and more storage. In addition, the smartphone from Marseille wants to score with up to three and a half days of battery life and a quad camera, and that for less than 200 Euros.
Foreign Reviews
Source: n-tv DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/17/2020
Source: n-tv DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/17/2020
Source: Computerhoy ES→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/09/2020
Rating: Total score: 77% features: 60% display: 70% mobility: 90% workmanship: 70%
Source: Computerhoy ES→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/09/2020
Rating: Total score: 77% features: 60% display: 70% mobility: 90% workmanship: 70%
Source: El Androide Libre ES→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Nice display; elegant design; high autonomy. Negative: Poor display; average performance; slow charging; relatively high price.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/15/2020
Source: El Androide Libre ES→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Nice display; elegant design; high autonomy. Negative: Poor display; average performance; slow charging; relatively high price.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/15/2020
Source: PC Guia PT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 12/05/2020
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 100%
Source: PC Guia PT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 12/05/2020
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 100%
Source: Android Geek PT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/09/2020
Rating: Total score: 64% performance: 50% display: 60% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: Android Geek PT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/09/2020
Rating: Total score: 64% performance: 50% display: 60% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: Android Geek PT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/01/2020
Rating: Total score: 52% performance: 40% display: 40% mobility: 80% workmanship: 50%
Source: Android Geek PT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/01/2020
Rating: Total score: 52% performance: 40% display: 40% mobility: 80% workmanship: 50%
Source: Frandroid FR→EN
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/08/2021
Rating: Total score: 50% performance: 30% display: 70% mobility: 100% workmanship: 60%
Source: Frandroid FR→EN
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/08/2021
Rating: Total score: 50% performance: 30% display: 70% mobility: 100% workmanship: 60%
Source: CNet France FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/30/2020
Rating: Total score: 50%
Source: CNet France FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/30/2020
Rating: Total score: 50%
Source: Le monde numerique FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/26/2020
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 60% performance: 60% workmanship: 80%
Source: Le monde numerique FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/26/2020
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 60% performance: 60% workmanship: 80%
Comment
Wiko:
Wiko SAS was founded as a French smartphone manufacturer in 2011. Since 2014, the Chinese technology group Tinno Mobile has owned a majority of Wiko. They produce in China. The company has already reached a considerable market share in the French market in early years and expanded to Europe and Africa later on. Nevertheless, the world market share is low.
Reviews are only available since 2014, that is since the first international expansion. Recently, the number of reviews has increased. The ratings are average (as of 2016).
These graphics cards are not suited for Windows 3D games. Office and Internet surfing however is possible.
Qualcomm Adreno 308: Integrated mid-range graphics card in the Snapdragon 425 SoCs that supports OpenGL ES 3.0 and features unified shaders.
Imagination PowerVR GE8100: Integrated graphics card for entry level ARM SoCs. Smallest variant of the Series8XE series of GPUs (GE8xx0) with a peak fillrate of only one pixel/clock.
Imagination PowerVR GE8320: Integrated graphics card for mid-range ARM SoCs.
unknown:
Only some 3D games with very low demands are playable with these cards.
Qualcomm Adreno 505: Mid range graphics card integrated in the Snapdragon 430 and 435 SoCs. Based on the 500 generation and supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0, OpenGL ES 3.1 + AE, OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 12.
Qualcomm Adreno 506: Integrated graphics card in the Snapdragon 625 SoC and based on the new 500-series architecture with support for Vulkan, OpenGL ES 3.1 + AE (3.2) and UBWC.
Non demanding games should be playable with these graphics cards.
ARM Mali-G72 MP3: Integrated graphics card from ARM with 3 cores based on the 2nd generation of the Bifrost architecture.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
Qualcomm Snapdragon:
425: Entry-level SoC that was announced in February 2016. It integrates 4 ARM Cortex-A53 CPU cores clocked at up to 1.4 GHz, an LPDDR3 memory controller and wireless radios for WiFi and 4G/LTE.
430: Lower mainstream octa-core ARM Cortex-A53 SoC clocked at up to 1.4 GHz and the Adreno 505 GPU, a DDR3L-1600 memory controller as well as an X6 LTE (Cat. 4) modem.
435: Lower mainstream octa-core ARM Cortex-A53 SoC clocked at up to 1.4 GHz and the Adreno 505 GPU, a DDR3L-1600 memory controller as well as an X9 LTE (Cat. 7) modem.
SD 450: Lower mainstream octa-core ARM Cortex-A53 SoC clocked at up to 1.8 GHz and the Adreno 506 GPU, a LPDDR3 single channel memory controller as well as an X9 LTE (Cat. 7 300 / 150 Mbps) modem.
Mediatek:
MT6739: Entry level quad core soc (4x Cortex-A53 at up to 1.5 GHz) with an integrated LTE modem (Cat. 4 DL / Cat 5 UL), Wifi and PowerVR GE8100 GPU.
Helio P60: ARM based octa-core SoC with 4x big ARM Cortex-A73 cores and 4x small and power efficient ARM Cortex-A53 cores. All clocked up to 2 GHz. Integrates a Cat-7 (DL) / Cat-13 (UL) LTE Modem (4G), ARM Mali-G72 MP3 GPU and a dedicated AI processing unit.
Helio P35 MT6765: ARM based octa core SoC (8x ARM Cortex-A53) clocked at up to 2.3 GHz. The chip also includes a Cat.7 LTE modem (300 Mbps download).
Mediatek Mediatek Helio 20:
Helio P22 MT6762: ARM based octa core SoC (8x ARM Cortex-A53) clocked at up to 2 GHz. The chip also includes a Cat.7 LTE modem (300 Mbps download).
Helio A25: ARM based octa core SoC (8x ARM Cortex-A53) clocked at up to 1.8 GHz. The chip also includes a Cat.4 LTE modem.
:
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
6.00:
It is a small display format for smartphones. You shouldn't be severely defective in vision, and you won't see much detail on the screen and only have a small resolution available. For that, the device should be small and handy, easy to transport.
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.
No weight comment found (one expected)!
71.06%: This rating is poor. More than three quarters of the models are rated better. That is rather not a purchase recommendation. Even if verbal ratings in this area do not sound that bad ("sufficient" or "satisfactory"), they are usually euphemisms that disguise a classification as a below-average laptop.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.