Notebookcheck

Wiko View 5 Smartphone Review - The 3.5-day mobile phone

A game of patience. With the View 5's "infinite" battery life, users of the entry-level smartphone should be particularly independent, according to Wiko. The AI paired with a 5,000-mAh battery is responsible for this. You can find out here whether it is worth buying the Wiko smartphone.
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, Daniel R Deakin (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), 🇩🇪 🇵🇹 ...
Wiko View5 Smartphone

The View 5's large 5,000-mAh battery is said to provide very long runtimes in combination with a 6.55-inch 720p IPS panel and the MediaTek Helio A25. According to the manufacturer, a "panel of experts", called SmartViser, confirms a guaranteed 3.5-day battery life on a single charge through a standardized battery test that simulates normal smartphone use.

In view of the economical hardware, the inexpensive View 5 (RRP: 169 Euros (~$201)) should definitely allow long battery life in our WLAN battery test.

Wiko View5 (View Series)
Processor
Mediatek Helio A25 8 x 1.8 GHz, Cortex-A53
Graphics adapter
Memory
3072 MB 
Display
6.55 inch 20:9, 1600 x 720 pixel 268 PPI, capacitive Touchscreen, LCD IPS, glossy: yes, 60 Hz
Storage
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 49 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5mm jack, Card Reader: microSD (up to 256GB), 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyroscope, proximity sensor, OTG, GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 4.2, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B3/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B20/​B28/​B40), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 9.3 x 165.95 x 76.8 ( = 0.37 x 6.53 x 3.02 in)
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Ion
Operating System
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix 84/5000 + 8 MPix (ultra wide angle) + 5 MPix (macro) + 2 MPix (depth sensor), Camera2 API: Full
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: Mono, Keyboard: Onscreen, headset, charger, USB C cable, Wiko UI, 24 Months Warranty, SAR: Head: 0.914W/kg, Body: 1.538W/kg, Limb: 2.449W/kg, Widevine L3, fanless
Weight
201 g ( = 7.09 oz / 0.44 pounds), Power Supply: 56 g ( = 1.98 oz / 0.12 pounds)
Price
170 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Comparison devices

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
76 %
11/2020
Wiko View5
Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320
201 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.55"1600x720
78 %
09/2020
Xiaomi Redmi 9
Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2
198 g32 GB eMMC Flash6.53"2340x1080
78 %
06/2020
realme 6i
Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2
199 g128 GB eMMC Flash6.50"1600x720
75 %
10/2020
Nokia 2.4
Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320
195 g32 GB eMMC Flash6.50"1600x720
80 %
09/2020
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2
199 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.53"2340x1080
76 %
08/2020
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2
192 g32 GB eMMC Flash6.50"1600x720

Case - Wiko smartphone with punch-hole

Wiko View 5 in Midnight Blue, Peach Gold, Pine Green
Wiko View 5 in Midnight Blue, Peach Gold, Pine Green

The housing, which is mostly made of plastic, is well made, but it does not look very high quality. Thanks to the relatively narrow display edges - with the exception of the "chin" - the display-surface ratio of the Wiko phone is over 81%, which is not bad for this price range.

The controls for volume control and the on/off switch are solidly crafted and have a well defined pressure point. Creaking noises are not audible even with strong pressure on the back, but the plastic gives way noticeably at the height of the fingerprint sensor.

Wiko View5 Smartphone
Wiko View5 Smartphone
Wiko View5 Smartphone

Size comparison

165.95 mm / 6.53 inch 76.8 mm / 3.02 inch 9.3 mm / 0.3661 inch 201 g0.4431 lbs165.9 mm / 6.53 inch 76.3 mm / 3 inch 8.7 mm / 0.3425 inch 195 g0.4299 lbs164.4 mm / 6.47 inch 75.4 mm / 2.97 inch 9 mm / 0.3543 inch 199 g0.4387 lbs163.7 mm / 6.44 inch 75.3 mm / 2.96 inch 8.9 mm / 0.3504 inch 192 g0.4233 lbs163.3 mm / 6.43 inch 77 mm / 3.03 inch 9.1 mm / 0.3583 inch 198 g0.4365 lbs162.3 mm / 6.39 inch 77.2 mm / 3.04 inch 8.9 mm / 0.3504 inch 199 g0.4387 lbs

Equipment - Wiko View 5 with 3.5 mm jack

The Wiko smartphone is equipped with an FM radio and a 3.5 mm jack. 64 GB of internal eMMC memory is available, but only about 49 GB is available to the user when delivered. If the storage space is not enough, it can be expanded with an additional microSD card. However, the exFAT file system is not supported.

By means of OTG adapters, peripheral devices can be connected via the USB-C port. The data transfer of the USB interface is based on the 2.0 standard.

A wireless image transfer of display contents via Miracast does not work with our test device.

Software - View 5 with Android 10

As operating system, the French manufacturer installs Android Version 10, which is supplemented by a minimally adapted user interface. The security patches are still quite up-to-date at the time of testing with the September 2020 update.

DRM-protected content from streaming platforms cannot be played back in HD resolution with the DRM Widevine L3 certification of the View 5.

Test Wiko View 5 Smartphone
Test Wiko View 5 Smartphone
Test Wiko View 5 Smartphone
Test Wiko View 5 Smartphone

Communication and GPS - Wiko smartphone with band 28

Thanks to the IEEE 802.11 standard, the integrated WLAN module operates in accordance with a/b/g/n/ac in the 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz frequency ranges. The transmission speed between the View 5 and our reference router Netgear Nighthawk AX12 is at a good level for a 170-Euro (~$202) phone and the signal is stable.

The dual SIM smartphone connects to the mobile Internet with up to two nanoSIM cards at LTE speed. As typical for a smartphone in this price range, the number of frequency bands supported by the Wiko phone is low. The View 5 can access only eight LTE bands. For local use, however, no compromises have to be made.

The situation is different for wireless communication capabilities. The entry-level smartphone does not have an NFC chip, and the View 5 is only compatible with Bluetooth version 4.2.

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (15.5 - 1414, n=299, last 2 years)
389 MBit/s ∼100% +17%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
355 (327min - 366max) MBit/s ∼91% +7%
Wiko View5
PowerVR GE8320, Helio A25, 64 GB eMMC Flash
332 (272min - 346max) MBit/s ∼85%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Mali-G52 MP2, Exynos 850, 32 GB eMMC Flash
326 (280min - 333max) MBit/s ∼84% -2%
Xiaomi Redmi 9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash
308 (290min - 337max) MBit/s ∼79% -7%
Nokia 2.4
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22 MT6762, 32 GB eMMC Flash
52.2 (30min - 78max) MBit/s ∼13% -84%
realme 6i
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
36.1 (9min - 57max) MBit/s ∼9% -89%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.59 - 1599, n=299, last 2 years)
374 MBit/s ∼100% +9%
Xiaomi Redmi 9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash
348 (325min - 355max) MBit/s ∼93% +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
347 (172min - 352max) MBit/s ∼93% +1%
Wiko View5
PowerVR GE8320, Helio A25, 64 GB eMMC Flash
342 (172min - 350max) MBit/s ∼91%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Mali-G52 MP2, Exynos 850, 32 GB eMMC Flash
310 (269min - 342max) MBit/s ∼83% -9%
realme 6i
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
66.5 (34min - 69max) MBit/s ∼18% -81%
Nokia 2.4
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22 MT6762, 32 GB eMMC Flash
46.9 (22min - 77max) MBit/s ∼13% -86%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340331334335324338319328324272325330329330327337336327323329336341332346327313337340334345346331334335324338319328324272325330329330327337336327323329336341332346327313337340334345346172341345339337342342341336342340340343340344336330335342332337341344349347350346349350344Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø330 (272-346)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø336 (172-350)
Inside
Inside
Outdoors
Outdoors

In order to be able to assess the positioning accuracy of our test device in practice, we record a route in parallel for comparison purposes with the GPS bicycle computer Garmin Edge 500. However, since problems occurred during the test - even though all energy-saving functions were disabled - the deviations of the GPS module are not available in detail for the View 5.

GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Wiko View5
GPS Wiko View5

Phone features and voice quality - View 5 with Wi-Fi calling

Test Wiko View 5 Smartphone

Despite the low price, the View 5 supports VoLTE and Wi-Fi calling. The voice quality is good and voices are clearly reproduced.

Video calls are also possible with the Wiko smartphone without any problems. The call quality over the speakers via Skype is good and the microphone reproduces voices clearly.

Cameras - Wiko smartphone with quad-cam system

View 5 selfie shot
View 5 selfie shot

The entry-level Wiko smartphone is not a selfie expert. Photos taken with the View 5's 8-megapixel front camera have good dynamics, but they are relatively blurred and lacking in detail.

The 12-megapixel images of the 48-megapixel sensor, which are the result of 4-in-1-pixel binning, show subjects in a natural and appealing way. In view of the low EIA, the main camera of the View 5 lacks hardly anything in sharpness and dynamics. Especially in low light, the illumination is still on a good level, but the autofocus no longer works reliably and the blurriness increases sharply.

Additionally, the View 5 uses an 8-megapixel ultra-wide angle cam. Compared to the main sensor, the Wiko phone lacks good photo quality in this discipline. The pictures are poor in details, especially in the border areas of the photo that are blurred and picture errors creep in.

The low price of the Wiko phone is also noticeable in the video performance. The View 5 does not offer a UHD function.

Test Wiko View 5 Smartphone
Test Wiko View 5 Smartphone
Test Wiko View 5 Smartphone
Test Wiko View 5 Smartphone

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Wide angleWide angleZoomLow LightUltra wide angle
ColorChecker
28.6 ∆E
52.4 ∆E
39.1 ∆E
35.4 ∆E
44.7 ∆E
62.9 ∆E
52.7 ∆E
35.3 ∆E
41.5 ∆E
28.3 ∆E
64.4 ∆E
63.7 ∆E
31.1 ∆E
47.2 ∆E
36.5 ∆E
73.6 ∆E
43.7 ∆E
43.6 ∆E
77.7 ∆E
68.6 ∆E
51 ∆E
36.4 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Wiko View5: 45.66 ∆E min: 13.46 - max: 77.7 ∆E
ColorChecker
5.5 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
4 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
1.2 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
7 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
6 ∆E
ColorChecker Wiko View5: 5.69 ∆E min: 1.23 - max: 10.19 ∆E

Accessories and warranty - Wiko View 5 with headphones

Optional accessories
Optional accessories

The Wiko phone comes with a modular 10-watt power supply, headphones, a USB cable and a protective case. Optionally, the French manufacturer offers a Smart Folio for the View 5 as well as a 2-in-1 protection package, which includes a hybrid casing and a hardened protective glass.

The warranty period is 24 months from the date of purchase.

Input Devices and Operation - Wiko phone without face unlock

The capacitive multi-touch screen pleases in the test with precise operation. The glass surface feels pleasant to the touch and has good sliding properties.

To unlock the Wiko smartphone, biometric identification by face is not available. However, an active fingerprint sensor is hidden on the back. The recognition rate is good, even if the sensor is not really fast.

Thanks to a dedicated Google Assistant button, the personal Google Helper is quickly available at the touch of a button to activate voice control.

Test Wiko View 5 Smartphone
Test Wiko View 5 Smartphone
Test Wiko View 5 Smartphone

Display - View 5 only with 720p panel

Sub-pixels
Sub-pixels

The IPS LC display measures 6.55 inches diagonally. With a resolution of 1600x720 pixels, this results in a low pixel density of only 268 ppi, which is sufficient at normal viewing distances.

The maximum luminance of 495 cd/m² measured by us is not very high, but it is on par with the competition in this price segment. The realistic APL50 test (Average Picture Level) with evenly distributed bright and dark areas also results in an almost equal maximum brightness of 485 cd/m².

The high minimum brightness of the Wiko phone is striking. Here we measure a luminance of over 19 cd/m².

443
cd/m²
485
cd/m²
465
cd/m²
435
cd/m²
495
cd/m²
462
cd/m²
442
cd/m²
475
cd/m²
445
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 495 cd/m² Average: 460.8 cd/m² Minimum: 19.2 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 495 cd/m²
Contrast: 3536:1 (Black: 0.14 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.5 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.6
ΔE Greyscale 6.2 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9
89.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.22
Wiko View5
LCD IPS, 1600x720, 6.55
Xiaomi Redmi 9
IPS LCD, 2340x1080, 6.53
realme 6i
IPS, 1600x720, 6.50
Nokia 2.4
IPS, 1600x720, 6.50
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
IPS LCD, 2340x1080, 6.53
Samsung Galaxy A21s
PLS, 1600x720, 6.50
Screen
-43%
-17%
-12%
24%
-27%
Brightness middle
495
476
-4%
518
5%
445
-10%
553
12%
540
9%
Brightness
461
436
-5%
484
5%
405
-12%
527
14%
509
10%
Brightness Distribution
88
86
-2%
89
1%
85
-3%
89
1%
91
3%
Black Level *
0.14
0.67
-379%
0.26
-86%
0.26
-86%
0.12
14%
0.36
-157%
Contrast
3536
710
-80%
1992
-44%
1712
-52%
4608
30%
1500
-58%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
6.5
3.51
46%
5.8
11%
4.73
27%
3.8
42%
6.58
-1%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
10
9.38
6%
11
-10%
8.83
12%
8.7
13%
11.55
-16%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
6.2
1.5
76%
7.3
-18%
4.2
32%
2.2
65%
6.4
-3%
Gamma
2.22 99%
2.166 102%
2.23 99%
2.292 96%
2.3 96%
2.206 100%
CCT
8157 80%
6485 100%
8037 81%
7378 88%
6727 97%
8482 77%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9716 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 151500) Hz was measured.

The black value of the IPS panel of 0.14 cd/m² results in a very good contrast ratio of about 3,500:1. In the realistic APL50 measurement we determine a black value of 0.39 cd/m², so that the contrast ratio is significantly reduced (1,244:1) but still competitive.

Using the X-Rite i1pro 2 photo spectrometer and the CalMAN analysis software, the display color of the IPS panel is checked. The sRGB color space is largely covered by the IPS panel. However, the average delta E deviation in the range of grayscales and mixed colors is 6.2 and 6.5 in the "Standard" profile, respectively, which is well above the ideal range of <3.

Color accuracy (profile: standard, target color space: sRGB)
Color accuracy (profile: standard, target color space: sRGB)
Color space (profile: standard, target color space: sRGB)
Color space (profile: standard, target color space: sRGB)
Grayscale (profile: standard, target color space: sRGB)
Grayscale (profile: standard, target color space: sRGB)
Color saturation (profile: standard, target color space: sRGB)
Color saturation (profile: standard, target color space: sRGB)
Color accuracy (profile: warm, target color space: sRGB)
Color accuracy (profile: warm, target color space: sRGB)
Grayscale (profile: warm, target color space: sRGB)
Grayscale (profile: warm, target color space: sRGB)
Color saturation (profile: warm, target color space: sRGB)
Color saturation (profile: warm, target color space: sRGB)
Color space (profile: warm, target color space: sRGB)
Color space (profile: warm, target color space: sRGB)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
30.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16.4 ms rise
↘ 14 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 76 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (24.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
54 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 26.4 ms rise
↘ 27.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 87 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (38.5 ms).

Even on sunny days, the liquid crystal display offers enough luminosity to read screen contents. However, if reflections occur on the display glass, the readability is visibly reduced. The viewing angle stability is good.

Performance - Wiko smartphone with Helio A25

The MediaTek Helio A25 used in the Wiko View 5 has eight Cortex-A53 processor cores, divided into two clusters. To save power, four cores are operated at up to 1.5 GHz, and the remaining four A53 cores clock at 1.8 GHz. An IMG PowerVR GE8320 is integrated as graphics chip.

The interaction of low-budget SoC and 3 GB RAM makes for a jerky everyday usage. When multitasking or as soon as there are working processes in the background, not only micro jerking occurs but there are also longer phases in which the View 5 cannot be operated. Due to the slow eMMC memory the loading times are also very pronounced.

The results of the benchmarks show a similar picture. Especially in the system benchmark of PCMark for Android as well as in the graphics-intensive benchmarks, the values of the Wiko phone are significantly below the comparison devices.

Geekbench 5.3
Vulkan Score 5.3 (sort by value)
Wiko View5
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
75 Points ∼4%
Xiaomi Redmi 9
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
1109 Points ∼60% +1379%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
1179 Points ∼63% +1472%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
565 Points ∼30% +653%
Average Mediatek Helio A25
  (72 - 75, n=3)
73 Points ∼4% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (72 - 6524, n=89, last 2 years)
1862 Points ∼100% +2383%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Wiko View5
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
865 Points ∼46%
Xiaomi Redmi 9
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
1281 Points ∼68% +48%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1348 Points ∼71% +56%
Nokia 2.4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
475 Points ∼25% -45%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
1259 Points ∼66% +46%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
1081 Points ∼57% +25%
Average Mediatek Helio A25
  (445 - 867, n=4)
758 Points ∼40% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4201, n=193, last 2 years)
1896 Points ∼100% +119%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Wiko View5
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
140 Points ∼26%
Xiaomi Redmi 9
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
363 Points ∼66% +159%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
387 Points ∼71% +176%
Nokia 2.4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
134 Points ∼24% -4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
356 Points ∼65% +154%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
182 Points ∼33% +30%
Average Mediatek Helio A25
  (124 - 141, n=4)
136 Points ∼25% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1604, n=193, last 2 years)
547 Points ∼100% +291%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Wiko View5
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
4302 Points ∼49%
Xiaomi Redmi 9
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
8795 Points ∼100% +104%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
8733 Points ∼99% +103%
Nokia 2.4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
5380 Points ∼61% +25%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
8698 Points ∼99% +102%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
5457 Points ∼62% +27%
Average Mediatek Helio A25
  (4302 - 5364, n=5)
4871 Points ∼55% +13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 15299, n=278, last 2 years)
7530 Points ∼86% +75%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Wiko View5
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
6032 Points ∼50%
Xiaomi Redmi 9
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
11534 Points ∼96% +91%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
12043 Points ∼100% +100%
Nokia 2.4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
7465 Points ∼62% +24%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
11421 Points ∼95% +89%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
7113 Points ∼59% +18%
Average Mediatek Helio A25
  (6032 - 7655, n=3)
6704 Points ∼56% +11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2689 - 19989, n=256, last 2 years)
9609 Points ∼80% +59%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Wiko View5
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
2012 Points ∼76%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2474 Points ∼94% +23%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
2059 Points ∼78% +2%
Average Mediatek Helio A25
  (2012 - 2037, n=2)
2025 Points ∼77% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 4061, n=219, last 2 years)
2632 Points ∼100% +31%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Wiko View5
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
455 Points ∼15%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1174 Points ∼40% +158%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
775 Points ∼26% +70%
Average Mediatek Helio A25
  (454 - 455, n=2)
455 Points ∼15% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 11259, n=219, last 2 years)
2955 Points ∼100% +549%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Wiko View5
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
559 Points ∼21%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1329 Points ∼51% +138%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
900 Points ∼34% +61%
Average Mediatek Helio A25
  (549 - 559, n=2)
554 Points ∼21% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 6977, n=219, last 2 years)
2611 Points ∼100% +367%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Wiko View5
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
858 Points ∼30%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2689 Points ∼96% +213%
Nokia 2.4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
981 Points ∼35% +14%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
2168 Points ∼77% +153%
Average Mediatek Helio A25
  (744 - 1160, n=5)
944 Points ∼34% +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (620 - 5780, n=279, last 2 years)
2814 Points ∼100% +228%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Wiko View5
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
387 Points ∼12%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1179 Points ∼36% +205%
Nokia 2.4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
408 Points ∼13% +5%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
784 Points ∼24% +103%
Average Mediatek Helio A25
  (377 - 427, n=5)
393 Points ∼12% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (73 - 12616, n=279, last 2 years)
3234 Points ∼100% +736%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Wiko View5
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
432 Points ∼15%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1347 Points ∼46% +212%
Nokia 2.4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
469 Points ∼16% +9%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
914 Points ∼31% +112%
Average Mediatek Helio A25
  (424 - 497, n=5)
449 Points ∼15% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (91 - 9643, n=279, last 2 years)
2933 Points ∼100% +579%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Wiko View5
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
892 Points ∼32%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2552 Points ∼92% +186%
Nokia 2.4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
973 Points ∼35% +9%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
2190 Points ∼79% +146%
Average Mediatek Helio A25
  (795 - 1165, n=5)
970 Points ∼35% +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (620 - 5765, n=277, last 2 years)
2767 Points ∼100% +210%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Wiko View5
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
712 Points ∼16%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1630 Points ∼36% +129%
Nokia 2.4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
775 Points ∼17% +9%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
1157 Points ∼26% +63%
Average Mediatek Helio A25
  (712 - 825, n=5)
747 Points ∼17% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 22052, n=279, last 2 years)
4501 Points ∼100% +532%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Wiko View5
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
747 Points ∼21%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1772 Points ∼49% +137%
Nokia 2.4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
812 Points ∼22% +9%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
1292 Points ∼36% +73%
Average Mediatek Helio A25
  (731 - 882, n=5)
787 Points ∼22% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (149 - 11895, n=279, last 2 years)
3614 Points ∼100% +384%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Wiko View5
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1032 Points ∼38%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2607 Points ∼96% +153%
Nokia 2.4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
1126 Points ∼41% +9%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
2037 Points ∼75% +97%
Average Mediatek Helio A25
  (1016 - 1138, n=5)
1060 Points ∼39% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5318, n=273, last 2 years)
2721 Points ∼100% +164%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Wiko View5
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
320 Points ∼12%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1179 Points ∼43% +268%
Nokia 2.4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
350 Points ∼13% +9%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
788 Points ∼29% +146%
Average Mediatek Helio A25
  (315 - 376, n=5)
336 Points ∼12% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (62 - 11573, n=273, last 2 years)
2742 Points ∼100% +757%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Wiko View5
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
377 Points ∼15%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1342 Points ∼52% +256%
Nokia 2.4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
413 Points ∼16% +10%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
912 Points ∼36% +142%
Average Mediatek Helio A25
  (372 - 442, n=5)
396 Points ∼15% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (78 - 9138, n=273, last 2 years)
2566 Points ∼100% +581%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Wiko View5
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1033 Points ∼39%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2610 Points ∼97% +153%
Nokia 2.4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
1130 Points ∼42% +9%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
2034 Points ∼76% +97%
Average Mediatek Helio A25
  (1033 - 1146, n=5)
1072 Points ∼40% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (607 - 5301, n=273, last 2 years)
2683 Points ∼100% +160%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Wiko View5
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
659 Points ∼17%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1625 Points ∼42% +147%
Nokia 2.4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
731 Points ∼19% +11%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
1157 Points ∼30% +76%
Average Mediatek Helio A25
  (656 - 752, n=5)
683 Points ∼18% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (54 - 16670, n=273, last 2 years)
3853 Points ∼100% +485%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Wiko View5
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
712 Points ∼22%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1774 Points ∼54% +149%
Nokia 2.4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
793 Points ∼24% +11%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
1280 Points ∼39% +80%
Average Mediatek Helio A25
  (712 - 814, n=5)
742 Points ∼23% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 11256, n=273, last 2 years)
3264 Points ∼100% +358%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Wiko View5
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
11236 Points ∼50%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
16820 Points ∼75% +50%
Nokia 2.4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
11885 Points ∼53% +6%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
18816 Points ∼84% +67%
Average Mediatek Helio A25
  (11166 - 14306, n=3)
12236 Points ∼55% +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4811 - 59268, n=247, last 2 years)
22400 Points ∼100% +99%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Wiko View5
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
12401 Points ∼23%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
25518 Points ∼48% +106%
Nokia 2.4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
13222 Points ∼25% +7%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
16301 Points ∼30% +31%
Average Mediatek Helio A25
  (12185 - 13006, n=3)
12531 Points ∼23% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2177 - 224130, n=246, last 2 years)
53562 Points ∼100% +332%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Wiko View5
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
12047 Points ∼32%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
22888 Points ∼61% +90%
Nokia 2.4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
12900 Points ∼34% +7%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
16800 Points ∼45% +39%
Average Mediatek Helio A25
  (11943 - 13274, n=3)
12421 Points ∼33% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2920 - 117606, n=246, last 2 years)
37592 Points ∼100% +212%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Wiko View5
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
20 fps ∼21%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
44 fps ∼47% +120%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
24 fps ∼26% +20%
Average Mediatek Helio A25
  (20 - 21, n=2)
20.5 fps ∼22% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.3 - 322, n=231, last 2 years)
93.7 fps ∼100% +369%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Wiko View5
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
26 fps ∼47%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
55 fps ∼100% +112%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
34 fps ∼62% +31%
Average Mediatek Helio A25
  (26 - 29, n=2)
27.5 fps ∼50% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8.2 - 143, n=231, last 2 years)
51.9 fps ∼94% +100%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Wiko View5
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
11 fps ∼20%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
24 fps ∼44% +118%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
15 fps ∼27% +36%
Average Mediatek Helio A25
  (11 - 11, n=2)
11 fps ∼20% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 180, n=230, last 2 years)
54.8 fps ∼100% +398%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Wiko View5
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
18 fps ∼42%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
43 fps ∼100% +139%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
28 fps ∼65% +56%
Average Mediatek Helio A25
  (18 - 19, n=2)
18.5 fps ∼43% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.5 - 120, n=229, last 2 years)
40.4 fps ∼94% +124%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Wiko View5
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
6.7 fps ∼18%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
16 fps ∼43% +139%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
9.4 fps ∼25% +40%
Average Mediatek Helio A25
  (6.7 - 7.1, n=2)
6.9 fps ∼18% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 117, n=227, last 2 years)
37.4 fps ∼100% +458%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Wiko View5
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
12 fps ∼38%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
31 fps ∼99% +158%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
19 fps ∼61% +58%
Average Mediatek Helio A25
  (12 - 13, n=2)
12.5 fps ∼40% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.1 - 106, n=227, last 2 years)
31.4 fps ∼100% +162%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Wiko View5
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
4.3 fps ∼32%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
11 fps ∼83% +156%
Nokia 2.4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
4.5 fps ∼34% +5%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
7.2 fps ∼54% +67%
Average Mediatek Helio A25
  (4.2 - 4.5, n=5)
4.32 fps ∼32% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=278, last 2 years)
13.3 fps ∼100% +209%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Wiko View5
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1.2 fps ∼13%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
3.3 fps ∼36% +175%
Nokia 2.4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
1.4 fps ∼15% +17%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
2.2 fps ∼24% +83%
Average Mediatek Helio A25
  (1.2 - 1.4, n=5)
1.3 fps ∼14% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.26 - 101, n=277, last 2 years)
9.17 fps ∼100% +664%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Wiko View5
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
6.9 fps ∼35%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
18 fps ∼90% +161%
Nokia 2.4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
7.1 fps ∼36% +3%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
12 fps ∼60% +74%
Average Mediatek Helio A25
  (6.7 - 7.2, n=5)
6.88 fps ∼34% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 66, n=278, last 2 years)
20 fps ∼100% +190%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Wiko View5
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
3.5 fps ∼15%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
9.2 fps ∼40% +163%
Nokia 2.4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
4 fps ∼17% +14%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
6.2 fps ∼27% +77%
Average Mediatek Helio A25
  (3.5 - 4, n=5)
3.72 fps ∼16% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.94 - 257, n=278, last 2 years)
23 fps ∼100% +557%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Wiko View5
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1.8 fps ∼8%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
9.4 fps ∼42% +422%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
5.9 fps ∼26% +228%
Average Mediatek Helio A25
  (1.8 - 3, n=2)
2.4 fps ∼11% +33%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.89 - 75, n=226, last 2 years)
22.5 fps ∼100% +1150%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Wiko View5
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
5.6 fps ∼28%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
17 fps ∼86% +204%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
11 fps ∼56% +96%
Average Mediatek Helio A25
  (5.4 - 5.6, n=2)
5.5 fps ∼28% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 60, n=226, last 2 years)
19.7 fps ∼100% +252%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Wiko View5
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
97328 Points ∼30%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
181928 Points ∼55% +87%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
124232 Points ∼38% +28%
Average Mediatek Helio A25
  (93758 - 97328, n=2)
95543 Points ∼29% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 727247, n=166, last 2 years)
328950 Points ∼100% +238%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Wiko View5
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
934 Points ∼75%
Xiaomi Redmi 9
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
1243 Points ∼100% +33%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1211 Points ∼97% +30%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
1198 Points ∼96% +28%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
990 Points ∼80% +6%
Average Mediatek Helio A25
  (916 - 934, n=2)
925 Points ∼74% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2169, n=216, last 2 years)
1197 Points ∼96% +28%
Graphics (sort by value)
Wiko View5
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
912 Points ∼18%
Xiaomi Redmi 9
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
1759 Points ∼35% +93%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1735 Points ∼35% +90%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
1845 Points ∼37% +102%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
1159 Points ∼23% +27%
Average Mediatek Helio A25
  (912 - 967, n=2)
940 Points ∼19% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (186 - 16996, n=216, last 2 years)
4972 Points ∼100% +445%
Memory (sort by value)
Wiko View5
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1047 Points ∼27%
Xiaomi Redmi 9
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
2654 Points ∼69% +153%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2542 Points ∼66% +143%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
2536 Points ∼66% +142%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
1884 Points ∼49% +80%
Average Mediatek Helio A25
  (975 - 1047, n=2)
1011 Points ∼26% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (434 - 9044, n=216, last 2 years)
3829 Points ∼100% +266%
System (sort by value)
Wiko View5
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
2492 Points ∼41%
Xiaomi Redmi 9
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
4865 Points ∼79% +95%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
4516 Points ∼74% +81%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
5010 Points ∼82% +101%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
3382 Points ∼55% +36%
Average Mediatek Helio A25
  (2479 - 2492, n=2)
2486 Points ∼40% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1160 - 14189, n=216, last 2 years)
6140 Points ∼100% +146%
Overall (sort by value)
Wiko View5
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1255 Points ∼38%
Xiaomi Redmi 9
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
2273 Points ∼69% +81%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2216 Points ∼67% +77%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
2285 Points ∼69% +82%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
1644 Points ∼50% +31%
Average Mediatek Helio A25
  (1209 - 1255, n=2)
1232 Points ∼37% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (179 - 6959, n=216, last 2 years)
3295 Points ∼100% +163%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (12.4 - 161, n=194, last 2 years)
46.6 Points ∼100% +277%
Xiaomi Redmi 9 (Chrome 85)
30.521 Points ∼65% +147%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 (Chrome 85)
29.951 Points ∼64% +142%
realme 6i (Chrome 81)
28.96 Points ∼62% +134%
Samsung Galaxy A21s (Chrome 84)
19.147 Points ∼41% +55%
Average Mediatek Helio A25 (12.4 - 13.7, n=2)
13.1 Points ∼28% +6%
Wiko View5 (Chrome 86)
12.372 Points ∼27%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (9 - 196, n=173, last 2 years)
47.9 runs/min ∼100%
Xiaomi Redmi 9 (Chrome 85)
28.1 runs/min ∼59%
realme 6i (Chrome 81)
27.7 runs/min ∼58%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 (Chrome 85)
27 runs/min ∼56%
Samsung Galaxy A21s (Chome 84)
15 runs/min ∼31%
Average Mediatek Helio A25
13.6 runs/min ∼28%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 194, n=215, last 2 years)
74.8 Points ∼100% +240%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 (Chrome 85)
45 Points ∼60% +105%
Xiaomi Redmi 9
45 Points ∼60% +105%
realme 6i (Chrome 81)
43 Points ∼57% +95%
Samsung Galaxy A21s (Chrome 84)
35 Points ∼47% +59%
Average Mediatek Helio A25 (22 - 24, n=2)
23 Points ∼31% +5%
Wiko View5 (Chrome 86)
22 Points ∼29%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (1986 - 58632, n=226, last 2 years)
15721 Points ∼100% +346%
realme 6i (Chrome 81)
10485 Points ∼67% +197%
Xiaomi Redmi 9 (Chrome 85)
10432 Points ∼66% +196%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 (Chrome 85)
10299 Points ∼66% +192%
Samsung Galaxy A21s (Chrome 84)
4976 Points ∼32% +41%
Average Mediatek Helio A25 (3526 - 4033, n=2)
3780 Points ∼24% +7%
Wiko View5 (Chrome 86)
3526 Points ∼22%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Wiko View5 (Chrome 86)
14832.2 ms * ∼100%
Average Mediatek Helio A25 (12118 - 14832, n=2)
13475 ms * ∼91% +9%
Samsung Galaxy A21s (Chrome 84)
9174.1 ms * ∼62% +38%
Average of class Smartphone (460 - 29635, n=227, last 2 years)
4635 ms * ∼31% +69%
Xiaomi Redmi 9 (Chrome 85)
4076.3 ms * ∼27% +73%
realme 6i (Chrome 81)
3937.5 ms * ∼27% +73%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 (Chrome 85)
3901.3 ms * ∼26% +74%

* ... smaller is better

Wiko View5Xiaomi Redmi 9realme 6iNokia 2.4Xiaomi Redmi Note 9Samsung Galaxy A21sAverage 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
40%
152%
-4%
144%
78%
11%
140%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
62.69 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
65 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
4%
64.46 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
3%
63 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
63.51 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
66.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
6%
58.5 (11.2 - 83.3, n=143)
-7%
59 (1.7 - 83.3, n=204, last 2 years)
-6%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
82 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
84.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
3%
84.56 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
3%
82.6 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
84.37 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
3%
80 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-2%
77.5 (21.1 - 108, n=143)
-5%
76.8 (13.4 - 154, n=204, last 2 years)
-6%
Random Write 4KB
16.29
60.71
273%
150.87
826%
22.5
38%
146.94
802%
89.5
449%
28.8 (3.4 - 147, n=162)
77%
101 (4.31 - 319, n=285, last 2 years)
520%
Random Read 4KB
49.56
49.09
-1%
73.46
48%
46
-7%
65.13
31%
77.2
56%
58.1 (11.4 - 149, n=162)
17%
122 (13.5 - 325, n=285, last 2 years)
146%
Sequential Write 256KB
223.45
119.76
-46%
256.36
15%
119.5
-47%
248.14
11%
104.3
-53%
177 (40 - 274, n=162)
-21%
287 (11.9 - 1321, n=285, last 2 years)
28%
Sequential Read 256KB
268.4
289.87
8%
309.45
15%
245.7
-8%
306.57
14%
307
14%
274 (95.6 - 704, n=162)
2%
686 (41.9 - 2037, n=285, last 2 years)
156%

Games - Gaming is not the strength of the View 5

The built-in IMG PowerVR GE8320 is not very powerful, but thanks to the low display resolution of the entry-level phone, it allows mostly smooth playback of older games. Demanding Android games, such as Asphalt 9 Legends or PUBG Mobile, do not run smoothly with the GPU built into the View 5 at the lowest graphics settings.

Both the touchscreen control and the position sensors react quickly and precisely in the test.

PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
Asphalt 9 Legends
Asphalt 9 Legends

Emissions - Cool Wiko View 5

Temperature

The housing of the Wiko smartphone heats up very little, even under permanent load.

Max. Load
 27.5 °C
82 F
27.6 °C
82 F
30.7 °C
87 F
 
 27.3 °C
81 F
27.5 °C
82 F
30.8 °C
87 F
 
 27.5 °C
82 F
27.6 °C
82 F
29.6 °C
85 F
 
Maximum: 30.8 °C = 87 F
Average: 28.5 °C = 83 F
26.9 °C
80 F
26.9 °C
80 F
27.5 °C
82 F
26.9 °C
80 F
27.3 °C
81 F
28.2 °C
83 F
26.7 °C
80 F
27.4 °C
81 F
28.2 °C
83 F
Maximum: 28.2 °C = 83 F
Average: 27.3 °C = 81 F
Power Supply (max.)  23.8 °C = 75 F | Room Temperature 20 °C = 68 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 28.5 °C / 83 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 30.8 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 28.2 °C / 83 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.4 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.

Speakers

In everyday use, the mono loudspeaker, which is located on the underside of the housing, produces a maximum volume of almost 93 dB. As expected, the sound image is characterized by sounds from mid and high frequencies, which are reproduced linearly for the price class.

The 3.5 millimeter jack connector allows a more bass rich reproduction, but the noise level is pronounced.

Speaker test: Pink Noise
Speaker test: Pink Noise
Noise level
Noise level
3.5 mm jack: Pink Noise
3.5 mm jack: Pink Noise
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2039.541.62527.641.73120.741.5402340.35033.550.16326.843.68020.844.71002244.112518.246.516017.847.520014.749.425015.153.131513.455.840012.259.850012.864.363011.571.480011.678.110001282.8125011.481.2160011.381.5200011.981.7250012.482.7315012.583.9400013.183.4500013.578.7630013.173.2800013.972.61000013.171125001474.21600013.768.7SPL24.892.6N0.689.8median 13.1median 72.6Delta1.512.536.934.52941.421.939.42241.729.942.82245.419.343.716.343.71445.816.951.314.952.514.155.91058.81163.111.768.210.97211.973.71180.110.279.711.478.912.879.512.980.912.581.71384.913.184.513.478.215.775.213.5761474.313.763.224.892.40.691.6median 13median 74.31.19.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseWiko View5Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Wiko View5 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (92.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 34% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (92.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Battery life - Wiko smartphone with 5,000 mAh

Energy consumption

In terms of energy consumption, the View 5 is exemplary. However, the lower power consumption in idle and especially under load is also due to the low-performance hardware.

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.14 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.68 / 1.94 / 1.96 Watt
Load midlight 2.62 / 3.81 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Wiko View5
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi 9
5020 mAh
realme 6i
5000 mAh
Nokia 2.4
4500 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
5020 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A21s
5000 mAh
Average Mediatek Helio A25
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-68%
-3%
-30%
-65%
-9%
-38%
Idle Minimum *
0.68
1.4
-106%
0.37
46%
0.74
-9%
1.5
-121%
0.89 (0.68 - 1.22, n=3)
-31%
0.911 (0.37 - 2.3, n=244, last 2 years)
-34%
Idle Average *
1.94
1.7
12%
1.62
16%
2.17
-12%
2.1
-8%
1.973 (1.79 - 2.19, n=3)
-2%
1.818 (0.82 - 3.94, n=244, last 2 years)
6%
Idle Maximum *
1.96
2.1
-7%
1.69
14%
2.2
-12%
2.9
-48%
2.01 (1.86 - 2.22, n=3)
-3%
2.11 (0.85 - 4.2, n=244, last 2 years)
-8%
Load Average *
2.62
5.7
-118%
3.61
-38%
4.17
-59%
4.6
-76%
2.69 (2.46 - 3, n=3)
-3%
4.4 (1.94 - 8.4, n=244, last 2 years)
-68%
Load Maximum *
3.81
8.5
-123%
5.9
-55%
6.11
-60%
6.6
-73%
4.01 (3.81 - 4.41, n=3)
-5%
7.12 (3.06 - 12.3, n=244, last 2 years)
-87%

* ... smaller is better

Battery life

In our WLAN test the Wiko phone shows very good runtimes under practical conditions (display brightness at 150 cd/m²). However, a realme 6i gets more than 3 hours extra out of the 5,000-mAh battery with similar hardware.

Battery Runtime
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
18h 52min
Wiko View5
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi 9
5020 mAh
realme 6i
5000 mAh
Nokia 2.4
4500 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
5020 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A21s
5000 mAh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3
1132
804
-29%
1318
16%
826
-27%
867
-23%
943
-17%

Pros

+ long runtimes
+ high-contrast IPS panel
+ solid loudspeaker
+ hardly any waste heat

Cons

- 720p panel
- performance
- load time

Verdict about Wiko View 5: At a snail's pace to the goal

In review: Wiko View 5. Test device provided by Wiko Germany.
In review: Wiko View 5. Test device provided by Wiko Germany.

The latest Wiko offspring is a visually successful, well-manufactured smartphone in the entry-level class. In the lower price segment, the View 5 shines with a good speaker, a high-contrast IPS panel and a surprisingly good main camera.

A somewhat more powerful chipset would have suited the View 5 well.

On the other hand, the performance of the cheap Wiko phone leaves a lot to be desired, and the low resolution of the display is also suboptimal at over 6.5 inches. Especially the low performance level reduces the user experience in everyday life noticeably.

If you can invest a little more money, then the Poco X3 - which is sometimes available for less than 200 Euros (~$237) - is a much better alternative.

Wiko View5 - 10/30/2020 v7
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
81%
Keyboard
66 / 75 → 88%
Pointing Device
84%
Connectivity
45 / 70 → 64%
Weight
88%
Battery
92%
Display
82%
Games Performance
5 / 64 → 7%
Application Performance
44 / 86 → 52%
Temperature
94%
Noise
100%
Audio
76 / 90 → 84%
Camera
62%
Average
71%
76%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Reviews > Wiko View 5 Smartphone Review - The 3.5-day mobile phone
Marcus Herbrich, 2020-11- 7 (Update: 2020-11- 7)
Marcus Herbrich
Editor of the original article: Marcus Herbrich - Editor - 231 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2016
My great passion has always been mobile technologies, especially smartphones. As a technology enthusiast, the half-life of my devices is not exactly high and the latest hardware is just good enough - manufacturer or operating system plays a minor role, the main thing is state-of-the-art