Wiko View 2 Pro Smartphone Review

Name: Wiko View 2 Pro
Brand: Wiko

Smartphone from the Mediterranean. From the sunny city of Marseille...the View 2 Pro, created by the French manufacturer Wiko, has found its way to our workbench. What makes the smartphone, priced at 300 Euros (~$350), stand out from other devices in its class? Read our review to find out.

Mike Wobker, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, ✓ Stefanie Voigt (translated by Ariana Brodsky), Published 07/09/2018 🇩🇪 🇫🇷 ...

Android Smartphone Touchscreen

Over the years we have reviewed a number of Wiko devices. They have always made a good impression on us, though the camera quality has often been a weak point. Yet precisely this feature is allegedly outstanding this time around: The 16 MP dual camera setup reportedly takes very good photos. The system runs smoothly, thanks to a team composed of a Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 and Adreno 506 GPU. 4 GB of RAM and 64 GB of eMMC flash storage also join the ranks.

The recommended retail price of 300 Euros (~$350) sorts the View 2 Pro into a price bracket thronged with competitors. For the purposes of this review, we will focus on five comparable devices in the same price range with nearly identical hardware configurations: the Xiaomi Redmi Note 5, the Motorola Moto G6, the Blade V9 from ZTE, the Honor 7X and the Samsung Galaxy A6.

Test device courtesy of Wiko Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Wiko View 2 Pro (View Series)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 8 x 1.8 GHz, Cortex-A53

Graphics adapter

Qualcomm Adreno 506

Memory

4 GB

Display

6.00 inch 19:9, 1528 x 720 pixel 282 PPI, capacitive, IPS, Corning Gorilla Glass, glossy: yes

Storage

64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB

, 54 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5mm jack, Card Reader: microSD (up to 256 GB), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, proximity sensor, magnetic sensor, gyroscope

Networking

802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.2, 4G LTE (B1/ B3 / B7 / B8 / B20), 3G (850/ 900/ 1900/ 2100 MHz), GSM/GPRS/EDGE (850/900/1800/1900 MHz), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8.3 x 153 x 72 ( = 0.33 x 6.02 x 2.83 in)

Battery

3000 mAh Lithium-Polymer, Talk time 2G (according to manufacturer): 42 h, Talk time 3G (according to manufacturer): 30 h, Standby 2G (according to manufacturer): 236 h

Operating System

Android 8.0 Oreo

Camera

Primary Camera: 16 MPix f/1.75
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix f/2

Additional features

Speakers: 2 speakers, Keyboard: onscreen, Keyboard Light: yes, headset, USB-based power supply, SIM ejector tool as key ring, Face Unlock, Wiko Launcher, Wiko Register, 24 Months Warranty, SAR value (head): 1.2 W/kg, SAR value (body): 1.39 W/kg, fanless

Weight

164 g ( = 5.78 oz / 0.36 pounds), Power Supply: 70 g ( = 2.47 oz / 0.15 pounds)

Price

300 Euro

Links

Wiko homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

[+] Add to comparison

» Compare devices

Case - Wiko smartphone with glass-like finish

The Wiko View 2 Pro's case is made of metal, though only the sides are palpably metallic. The back side is sealed with a "glass touch" material that feels much like plastic. All the components are carefully assembled; there are no uneven gaps or rough edges to speak of. On the front side, Wiko has tried to allocate the display as much space as possible. The notch houses only the selfie camera; the speaker occupies a very narrow bar above the display. Buyers can choose between the colors black and gold.

Size Comparison

Connectivity - Dual SIM Android phone

The View 2 Pro runs on a Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SoC, supported by an Adreno 506 graphics unit. With 4 GB of RAM and 64 GB of eMMC flash storage, the Wiko smartphone offers a solid mid-range base configuration. Via microSD card, the internal storage can be expanded by up to 256 GB—though the user then forfeits the possibility of installing a second SIM card.

The slot on the left side of the device can only house two SIM cards or one SIM card and one microSD card. The volume rocker and the power button sit on the right side, secure in their respective casing. The latter has a ribbed surface. A 3.5 mm jack on the top side of the device enables the user to connect the headset that comes with the smartphone. The bottom side houses a second speaker and the microUSB connection. The latter supports OTG and thus allows external USB devices to be connected.

Software - Pure Android from Wiko

Wiko chose Android Oreo Version 8.0 as the View 2 Pro's OS, with security updates dated from May 5, 2018. Users get pure Android without any modifications by the manufacturer. Only the functionality-related apps, for example support for the intelligent cover functions, come preinstalled on our test device.

As soon as an SD card is installed, the user is asked whether the additional storage should be employed as a mobile storage medium or as internal storage. To enable multiple users to make use of the Android smartphone, various accounts can be set up through the menu.

Communication and GPS - Smartphone for accurate location services

The Wiko smartphone can establish wireless connections via GSM, 3G and LTE (Cat. 6). The reception is always good, though in areas with bad network coverage, the View 2 Pro tends to lose connection quicker than other smartphones.

Users can rely on NFC, Bluetooth 4.0 and WLAN for communication over shorter distances. The latter only supports the standards b, g and n on the 2.4 GHz band. The dual SIM smartphone reaches comparatively poor transfer rates of under 50 Mb/s, and its WLAN range is also shorter than those of comparable devices. Compared to the competition, it takes last place in this discipline.

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Average of class Smartphone (42.9 - 884, n=36, last 2 years)	484 MBit/s ∼100% +917%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Adreno 509, SD 636, 32 GB eMMC Flash	273 MBit/s ∼56% +474%
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018 Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 32 GB eMMC Flash	123 MBit/s ∼25% +158%
Motorola Moto G6 Adreno 506, SD 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash	113 MBit/s ∼23% +137%
Wiko View 2 Pro Adreno 506, SD 450, 64 GB eMMC Flash	47.6 MBit/s ∼10%
Huawei Honor 7X Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 32 GB eMMC Flash	47 MBit/s ∼10% -1%
iperf3 receive AX12
Average of class Smartphone (50.4 - 938, n=37, last 2 years)	477 MBit/s ∼100% +1009%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Adreno 509, SD 636, 32 GB eMMC Flash	268 MBit/s ∼56% +523%
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018 Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 32 GB eMMC Flash	120 MBit/s ∼25% +179%
Motorola Moto G6 Adreno 506, SD 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash	113 MBit/s ∼24% +163%
Huawei Honor 7X Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 32 GB eMMC Flash	46.4 MBit/s ∼10% +8%
Wiko View 2 Pro Adreno 506, SD 450, 64 GB eMMC Flash	43 MBit/s ∼9%

To determine its location, the View 2 Pro relies on GPS and A-GPS, as well as Glonass and Beidou. We use the GPS Test app to determine how accurately a smartphone can position us. Outdoors, the View 2 Pro could position us to within three meters (~10 feet) of our actual location. The satellite connection remained stable indoors too—though the accuracy fell to 30 meters (~100 feet).

The View 2 Pro's precision in this area was once again verified by our obligatory bike ride. We assessed the Wiko smartphone's results compared to those of our reference device, the Garmin Edge 500. At times, the Android phone recorded our route more accurately than the professional bike navigation device. Especially along the length of extended curves and on narrow paths, our test device registered the course with a substantially higher level of precision.

Phone Function and Speech Quality - Clear connection with the Android phone

Users of the Wiko View 2 Pro have the standard Android phone app at their command. Phone calls can be placed easily, and finding contacts in the phone book is simple. During conversations, participants are loud and easy to understand. Even in loud environments, the volume is sufficient to drown out background noise. The speakerphone function also produces a clear sound through the built-in speakers. At maximum volume, however, the speakers do buzz somewhat. The headset that comes with the smartphone is good for phone calls and offers a louder volume with good speech output.

Cameras - Android smartphone with dual cameras

In Wiko's advertising, the company focuses primarily on the View 2 Pro's cameras. On the back, users have access to a dual camera system with a 16 MP IMX 499 sensor and an f/1.7 aperture. The front camera also offers 16 MP, though it only has one sensor and an f/2.0 aperture. The front camera only takes acceptable photos in daylight, and even in these circumstances, the pictures look a little pale and could be somewhat sharper in background areas.

Despite its comparatively smaller aperture, the Wiko smartphone's main camera takes somewhat darker photos. On the other hand, the sensor reproduces background details well, and both light and dark areas of an image are clearly distinguished from each other. In close-ups, color transitions are a little washed out, and the background looks especially hazy. In poor lighting, the dual camera system's performance drops significantly. Areas in the direct vicinity of a light source are reproduced decently well, but the image quickly fades into total darkness. Users have more control over photographs in pro mode, where they can manually set lighting, white balance, ISO and color saturation. Manual focus is also available in this mode.

The camera function is accompanied by very few settings options. However, aside from resolution, users can also choose a broader angle. The image stabilizer performs its job well.

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

We evaluate a camera's image colors with ColorChecker Passport. In photos taken with the Wiko View 2 Pro's camera, all colors look substantially too light and only blacks are darker than they ought to be.

In a controlled lighting environment, the image once again looks too dark and faintly blurry around the edges. Details, however—such as fine lines and symbols—remain recognizable. The imaging performance is good primarily in the center of the photo, but colors are too pale, and the image is too dark overall.

Accessories and Warranty - MicroUSB and headset in the box

The Wiko View 2 Pro's box contents include a USB power supply with a matching microUSB cable and a stereo headset. The latter is good for conversations, but due to the relatively low volume, playing media content over long periods is not recommendable. Also enclosed in the box is a SIM ejector tool packaged in a rubber key ring.

On the manufacturer's website, customers can purchase universal smartphone accessories. Cases and protective films customized for the View 2 Pro are also available on that site, though they can only be obtained through an intermediary distributor.

Buyers of the Wiko View 2 Pro will receive a 24-month warranty for the smartphone. Please see our Guarantees, Return policies and Warranties FAQ for country-specific information.

Input Devices and Operation - Smartphone with face-recognition

For text input on the Wiko smartphone, Google's standard GBoard keyboard stands at the ready. This keyboard enables users to type texts quickly and easily. The touchscreen reacts promptly and features an especially smooth surface. It is easy to execute drag-and-drop gestures, and the position sensor reacts quickly and reliably.

To unlock the device, users can turn to the fingerprint reader or face-recognition. While the sensor only reacts if a registered finger touches the surface nearly exactly as it was saved, the face-recognition system functions reliably. Unlocking the device with face-recognition takes hardly any longer than entering a PIN or pattern.

Display - Bright display with low contrast

The Wiko View 2 Pro's display consists of a 6-inch IPS panel protected by Corning Gorilla Glass. It has a resolution of 1528x720 pixels. At an average brightness level of around 541 cd/m², the View 2 Pro offers the brightest screen among the competitors. On the other hand, other manufacturers have equipped their smartphones in this price bracket with displays that offer substantially higher resolutions in 2:1 format.


518 cd/m²	557 cd/m²	560 cd/m²
527 cd/m²	562 cd/m²	553 cd/m²
536 cd/m²	529 cd/m²	530 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 562 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 541.3 cd/m² Minimum: 4.68 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 562 cd/m²
Contrast: 1004:1 (Black: 0.56 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.9 | 0.55-29.43 Ø5.1
ΔE Greyscale 10.4 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.02

	Wiko View 2 Pro IPS, 1528x720, 6.00	Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 IPS, 2160x1080, 5.99	Motorola Moto G6 IPS, 2160x1080, 5.70	ZTE Blade V9 IPS, 2160x1080, 5.70	Huawei Honor 7X IPS, 2160x1080, 5.93	Samsung Galaxy A6 2018 Super AMOLED, 1480x720, 5.60
Screen		34%	22%	9%	32%	27%
Brightness middle	562	518 -8%	488 -13%	459 -18%	533.2 -5%	453 -19%
Brightness	541	532 -2%	478 -12%	437 -19%	511 -6%	459 -15%
Brightness Distribution	92	94 2%	95 3%	90 -2%	88 -4%	93 1%
Black Level *	0.56	0.23 59%	0.42 25%	0.62 -11%	0.35 37%
Contrast	1004	2252 124%	1162 16%	740 -26%	1523 52%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	7.9	5.66 28%	3.9 51%	4.5 43%	2.83 64%	2.6 67%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	15.7	10.32 34%	6.8 57%	7.3 54%	6.72 57%	9.2 41%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	10.4	6.8 35%	5.3 49%	4.9 53%	3.7 64%	1.6 85%
Gamma	2.02 ^109%	2.269 ^97%	2.41 ^91%	2.17 ^101%	1.9 ^116%	2.07 ^106%
CCT	8834 ^74%	8564 ^76%	7146 ^91%	7261 ^90%	6918 ^94%	6356 ^102%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

2347 Hz

≤ 4 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 2347 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 4 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 2347 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18993 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Apart from its good brightness level, the Wiko smartphone's display performed mostly below average in our tests. At 0.56, the black value is significantly elevated compared to the Wiko device's competitors, and the contrast ratio of 1004:1 is weaker than the competition. In addition, the DeltaE values we measured exceed those of the devices we have selected for comparison. In everyday use, these results manifest themselves in the display content's somewhat pale colors and a gray haze that covers the entire image.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
21.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 6 ms rise
21.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 15.6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 39 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
38.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 8.4 ms rise
38.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 30 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (34.5 ms).

On cloudy days, even outdoors the display content on the Wiko View 2 Pro is clearly visible. In direct sunlight, however, the luminosity is not sufficient to overcome the intense ambient light. The screen's reflective surface can further obscure the display content.

The Wiko smartphone's IPS panel offers very stable viewing angles. As a result, the screen content looks correct from every position, provided no objects in the surrounding environment are reflected on the display.

Performance - Lower mid-range Wiko phone

In the Wiko View 2 Pro, a Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 and an Adreno 506 GPU provide the necessary processing power for the system to run smoothly. Combined with 4 GB of RAM and 64 GB of flash storage, the components in this lower mid-range smartphone do in fact perform quite well.

The Android phone's benchmark results are a mixed bag. While the Wiko smartphone takes last place in some tests, it secures a top position in others. In everyday use, our test device functions unproblematically and opens apps without long lags.

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Wiko View 2 Pro	57201 Points ∼62%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5	92672 Points ∼100% +62%
Motorola Moto G6	59454 Points ∼64% +4%
ZTE Blade V9	60077 Points ∼65% +5%
Huawei Honor 7X	62810 Points ∼68% +10%
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018	46779 Points ∼50% -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (54731 - 60077, n=10)	57703 Points ∼62% +1%

AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Wiko View 2 Pro	69661 Points ∼60%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5	115654 Points ∼100% +66%
Motorola Moto G6	71352 Points ∼62% +2%
ZTE Blade V9	71712 Points ∼62% +3%
Huawei Honor 7X	81992 Points ∼71% +18%
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018	61794 Points ∼53% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (56497 - 73468, n=11)	69869 Points ∼60% 0%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Wiko View 2 Pro	5395 Points ∼40%
Motorola Moto G6	5321 Points ∼39% -1%
ZTE Blade V9	4967 Points ∼37% -8%
Huawei Honor 7X	6213 Points ∼46% +15%
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018	4878 Points ∼36% -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (4836 - 6062, n=14)	5364 Points ∼39% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (10619 - 19297, n=3, last 2 years)	13600 Points ∼100% +152%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Wiko View 2 Pro	4637 Points ∼44%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5	5642 Points ∼54% +22%
Motorola Moto G6	4552 Points ∼43% -2%
ZTE Blade V9	4401 Points ∼42% -5%
Huawei Honor 7X	4859 Points ∼46% +5%
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018	3809 Points ∼36% -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (4171 - 4759, n=14)	4502 Points ∼43% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (7100 - 12871, n=15, last 2 years)	10509 Points ∼100% +127%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Wiko View 2 Pro	1159 Points ∼22%
Motorola Moto G6	1069 Points ∼20% -8%
ZTE Blade V9	1169 Points ∼22% +1%
Huawei Honor 7X	1334 Points ∼25% +15%
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018	985 Points ∼19% -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (389 - 1337, n=14)	1083 Points ∼21% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (411 - 9679, n=166, last 2 years)	5243 Points ∼100% +352%
System (sort by value)
Wiko View 2 Pro	2894 Points ∼32%
Motorola Moto G6	2560 Points ∼28% -12%
ZTE Blade V9	2772 Points ∼31% -4%
Huawei Honor 7X	2899 Points ∼32% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018	2201 Points ∼24% -24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (2560 - 2898, n=14)	2736 Points ∼30% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (2376 - 19657, n=166, last 2 years)	9025 Points ∼100% +212%
Memory (sort by value)
Wiko View 2 Pro	861 Points ∼15%
Motorola Moto G6	770 Points ∼14% -11%
ZTE Blade V9	962 Points ∼17% +12%
Huawei Honor 7X	1788 Points ∼31% +108%
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018	1096 Points ∼19% +27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (770 - 1522, n=14)	1058 Points ∼19% +23%
Average of class Smartphone (670 - 11617, n=166, last 2 years)	5681 Points ∼100% +560%
Graphics (sort by value)
Wiko View 2 Pro	975 Points ∼8%
Motorola Moto G6	965 Points ∼8% -1%
ZTE Blade V9	956 Points ∼8% -2%
Huawei Honor 7X	845 Points ∼7% -13%
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018	533 Points ∼5% -45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (943 - 984, n=14)	962 Points ∼8% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (697 - 31928, n=166, last 2 years)	11779 Points ∼100% +1108%
Web (sort by value)
Wiko View 2 Pro	743 Points ∼51%
Motorola Moto G6	688 Points ∼47% -7%
ZTE Blade V9	731 Points ∼50% -2%
Huawei Honor 7X	724 Points ∼50% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018	732 Points ∼50% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (10 - 981, n=14)	671 Points ∼46% -10%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 2392, n=166, last 2 years)	1461 Points ∼100% +97%

Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Wiko View 2 Pro	778 Points ∼18%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5	1339 Points ∼30% +72%
Motorola Moto G6	743 Points ∼17% -4%
ZTE Blade V9	769 Points ∼17% -1%
Huawei Honor 7X	869 Points ∼20% +12%
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018	732 Points ∼17% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (741 - 787, n=13)	761 Points ∼17% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (800 - 8424, n=86, last 2 years)	4424 Points ∼100% +469%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Wiko View 2 Pro	4022 Points ∼34%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5	4943 Points ∼42% +23%
Motorola Moto G6	3868 Points ∼33% -4%
ZTE Blade V9	3907 Points ∼33% -3%
Huawei Honor 7X	3342 Points ∼29% -17%
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018	3741 Points ∼32% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (3272 - 4022, n=13)	3862 Points ∼33% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 21505, n=86, last 2 years)	11698 Points ∼100% +191%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Wiko View 2 Pro	3362 Points ∼37%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5	4578 Points ∼50% +36%
Motorola Moto G6	2777 Points ∼31% -17%
ZTE Blade V9	3157 Points ∼35% -6%
Huawei Honor 7X	2772 Points ∼31% -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (2777 - 3374, n=10)	3146 Points ∼35% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (2053 - 14785, n=66, last 2 years)	9087 Points ∼100% +170%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Wiko View 2 Pro	12878 Points ∼21%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5	20033 Points ∼33% +56%
Motorola Moto G6	12756 Points ∼21% -1%
ZTE Blade V9	12764 Points ∼21% -1%
Huawei Honor 7X	10882 Points ∼18% -15%
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018	5537 Points ∼9% -57%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (12562 - 13203, n=12)	12801 Points ∼21% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (53961 - 68549, n=2, last 2 years)	61255 Points ∼100% +376%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Wiko View 2 Pro	12550 Points ∼14%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5	20909 Points ∼23% +67%
Motorola Moto G6	12441 Points ∼14% -1%
ZTE Blade V9	12482 Points ∼14% -1%
Huawei Honor 7X	10332 Points ∼12% -18%
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018	5376 Points ∼6% -57%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (12281 - 12736, n=12)	12470 Points ∼14% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (88482 - 90133, n=2, last 2 years)	89308 Points ∼100% +612%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Wiko View 2 Pro	15177 Points ∼50%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5	17471 Points ∼57% +15%
Motorola Moto G6	13997 Points ∼46% -8%
ZTE Blade V9	13862 Points ∼46% -9%
Huawei Honor 7X	13372 Points ∼44% -12%
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018	6184 Points ∼20% -59%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (13596 - 15273, n=12)	14216 Points ∼47% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (22441 - 38328, n=2, last 2 years)	30385 Points ∼100% +100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Wiko View 2 Pro	818 Points ∼25%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5	1458 Points ∼45% +78%
Motorola Moto G6	800 Points ∼25% -2%
ZTE Blade V9	807 Points ∼25% -1%
Huawei Honor 7X	622 Points ∼19% -24%
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018	325 Points ∼10% -60%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (800 - 829, n=14)	812 Points ∼25% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (712 - 7285, n=82, last 2 years)	3248 Points ∼100% +297%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Wiko View 2 Pro	706 Points ∼20%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5	1313 Points ∼38% +86%
Motorola Moto G6	690 Points ∼20% -2%
ZTE Blade V9	697 Points ∼20% -1%
Huawei Honor 7X	528 Points ∼15% -25%
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018	264 Points ∼8% -63%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (690 - 716, n=14)	701 Points ∼20% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (618 - 9025, n=82, last 2 years)	3496 Points ∼100% +395%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Wiko View 2 Pro	1833 Points ∼62%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5	2379 Points ∼81% +30%
Motorola Moto G6	1803 Points ∼61% -2%
ZTE Blade V9	1813 Points ∼62% -1%
Huawei Honor 7X	1656 Points ∼56% -10%
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018	1705 Points ∼58% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (1504 - 1901, n=14)	1785 Points ∼61% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4535, n=82, last 2 years)	2946 Points ∼100% +61%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Wiko View 2 Pro	449 Points ∼18%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5	934 Points ∼37% +108%
Motorola Moto G6	442 Points ∼18% -2%
ZTE Blade V9	444 Points ∼18% -1%
Huawei Honor 7X	409 Points ∼16% -9%
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018	262 Points ∼10% -42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (438 - 449, n=14)	443 Points ∼18% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 7890, n=126, last 2 years)	2506 Points ∼100% +458%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Wiko View 2 Pro	369 Points ∼15%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5	797 Points ∼32% +116%
Motorola Moto G6	363 Points ∼15% -2%
ZTE Blade V9	365 Points ∼15% -1%
Huawei Honor 7X	338 Points ∼14% -8%
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018	211 Points ∼8% -43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (349 - 382, n=14)	365 Points ∼15% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 9814, n=126, last 2 years)	2503 Points ∼100% +578%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Wiko View 2 Pro	1855 Points ∼61%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5	2346 Points ∼78% +26%
Motorola Moto G6	1834 Points ∼61% -1%
ZTE Blade V9	1841 Points ∼61% -1%
Huawei Honor 7X	1553 Points ∼51% -16%
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018	1709 Points ∼57% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (1521 - 1860, n=14)	1790 Points ∼59% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 4679, n=126, last 2 years)	3017 Points ∼100% +63%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Wiko View 2 Pro	33 fps ∼41%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5	35 fps ∼44% +6%
Motorola Moto G6	20 fps ∼25% -39%
ZTE Blade V9	fps ∼0% -100%
Huawei Honor 7X	18 fps ∼23% -45%
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018	19 fps ∼24% -42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (20 - 34, n=13)	28.1 fps ∼35% -15%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 165, n=193, last 2 years)	79.9 fps ∼100% +142%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Wiko View 2 Pro	22 fps ∼10%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5	35 fps ∼17% +59%
Motorola Moto G6	22 fps ∼10% 0%
ZTE Blade V9	fps ∼0% -100%
Huawei Honor 7X	19 fps ∼9% -14%
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018	12 fps ∼6% -45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (21 - 23, n=13)	21.8 fps ∼10% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 497, n=193, last 2 years)	210 fps ∼100% +855%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Wiko View 2 Pro	17 fps ∼25%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5	15 fps ∼22% -12%
Motorola Moto G6	8.9 fps ∼13% -48%
ZTE Blade V9	fps ∼0% -100%
Huawei Honor 7X	7.9 fps ∼12% -54%
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018	10 fps ∼15% -41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (8.7 - 18, n=13)	13.9 fps ∼21% -18%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 161, n=193, last 2 years)	67.4 fps ∼100% +296%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Wiko View 2 Pro	9.4 fps ∼8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5	16 fps ∼14% +70%
Motorola Moto G6	9.4 fps ∼8% 0%
ZTE Blade V9	fps ∼0% -100%
Huawei Honor 7X	8 fps ∼7% -15%
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018	5.4 fps ∼5% -43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (9.2 - 9.4, n=13)	9.3 fps ∼8% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (9.2 - 331, n=194, last 2 years)	117.5 fps ∼100% +1150%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Wiko View 2 Pro	12 fps ∼22%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5	10 fps ∼18% -17%
Motorola Moto G6	5.8 fps ∼11% -52%
ZTE Blade V9	fps ∼0% -100%
Huawei Honor 7X	4.5 fps ∼8% -62%
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018	6.9 fps ∼13% -42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (5.7 - 13, n=13)	9.98 fps ∼18% -17%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 143, n=194, last 2 years)	54.5 fps ∼100% +354%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Wiko View 2 Pro	6.1 fps ∼8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5	9.8 fps ∼12% +61%
Motorola Moto G6	6.1 fps ∼8% 0%
ZTE Blade V9	fps ∼0% -100%
Huawei Honor 7X	4.7 fps ∼6% -23%
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018	3.2 fps ∼4% -48%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (6 - 6.9, n=13)	6.15 fps ∼8% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (6.2 - 223, n=194, last 2 years)	80.2 fps ∼100% +1215%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Wiko View 2 Pro	6.6 fps ∼18%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5	6 fps ∼16% -9%
Motorola Moto G6	3.3 fps ∼9% -50%
ZTE Blade V9	fps ∼0% -100%
Huawei Honor 7X	2.9 fps ∼8% -56%
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018	4 fps ∼11% -39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (3.3 - 7, n=13)	5.4 fps ∼14% -18%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 110, n=194, last 2 years)	37.7 fps ∼100% +471%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Wiko View 2 Pro	3.5 fps ∼7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5	6.3 fps ∼13% +80%
Motorola Moto G6	3.4 fps ∼7% -3%
ZTE Blade V9	fps ∼0% -100%
Huawei Honor 7X	2.9 fps ∼6% -17%
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018	2 fps ∼4% -43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (3.3 - 3.6, n=13)	3.44 fps ∼7% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (2.9 - 166, n=194, last 2 years)	48.9 fps ∼100% +1297%

Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G6	5.38 fps ∼99%
ZTE Blade V9	5.41 fps ∼100%
Huawei Honor 7X	4.32 fps ∼80%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (5.38 - 5.41, n=2)	5.4 fps ∼100%

Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5	255 Points ∼14%
Motorola Moto G6	129 Points ∼7%
ZTE Blade V9	129 Points ∼7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (129 - 129, n=2)	129 Points ∼7%
Average of class Smartphone (177 - 5296, n=61, last 2 years)	1801 Points ∼100%

Legend

Wiko View 2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash

Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Qualcomm Adreno 509, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Motorola Moto G6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 32 GB eMMC Flash

ZTE Blade V9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Huawei Honor 7X HiSilicon Kirin 659, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Samsung Galaxy A6 2018 Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450

Average of class Smartphone

In the browser benchmarks, the Wiko phone's performance is standard for a lower mid-range device—in every test, the results position our test device in the middle or lower portion of our list. Surfing the Internet is still a smooth experience, though media content (e.g. YouTube videos) sometimes requires longer load times.

JetStream 1.1 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | WebXPRT 2015

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (31.3 - 414, n=52, last 2 years)	150.4 Points ∼100% +576%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 (Chrome 67)	44.32 Points ∼29% +99%
Huawei Honor 7X (Chrome 63.0.3239.111)	31.3 Points ∼21% +41%
Motorola Moto G6 (Chrome 66)	22.56 Points ∼15% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (22 - 22.7, n=13)	22.4 Points ∼15% +1%
Wiko View 2 Pro (Chrome 67)	22.26 Points ∼15%
ZTE Blade V9 (Ume Browser 1.2.18)	22.01 Points ∼15% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018 (Chrome 64.0.3282.137)	20.88 Points ∼14% -6%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 74261, n=205, last 2 years)	30474 Points ∼100% +662%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 (Chrome 67)	8422 Points ∼28% +110%
Huawei Honor 7X (Chrome 63.0.3239.111)	5302 Points ∼17% +33%
Wiko View 2 Pro (Chrome 67)	4001 Points ∼13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (3470 - 4115, n=14)	3981 Points ∼13% 0%
ZTE Blade V9 (Ume Browser 1.2.18)	3969 Points ∼13% -1%
Motorola Moto G6 (Chrome 66)	3943 Points ∼13% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018 (Chrome 64.0.3282.137)	3739 Points ∼12% -7%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
ZTE Blade V9 (Ume Browser 1.2.18)	11863 ms * ∼100% -4%
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018 (Chrome 64.0.3282.137)	11808 ms * ∼100% -3%
Motorola Moto G6 (Chrome 66)	11751 ms * ∼99% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (11012 - 11863, n=14)	11506 ms * ∼97% -0%
Wiko View 2 Pro (Chrome 67)	11456 ms * ∼97%
Huawei Honor 7X (Chrome 63.0.3239.111)	8684 ms * ∼73% +24%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 (Chrome 67)	4740 ms * ∼40% +59%
Average of class Smartphone (414 - 9999, n=171, last 2 years)	1881 ms * ∼16% +84%

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 (Chrome 67)	158 Points ∼100%
Huawei Honor 7X (Chrome 63.0.3239.111)	111 Points ∼70%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (90 - 103, n=7)	97 Points ∼61%
ZTE Blade V9 (Ume Browser 1.2.18)	90 Points ∼57%
Motorola Moto G6 (Chrome 66)	90 Points ∼57%
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018 (Chrome 64.0.3282.137)	89 Points ∼56%

* ... smaller is better

Of the 64 GB of internal storage, around 54 GB remains available to the user. The write and read speeds are appropriate for a device in this price bracket. If we average the results from all of the smartphones we have reviewed, the Wiko View 2 Pro surpasses those speeds by around 15%. With our Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 reference memory card, the microSD card reader also reached speeds that are more or less on par with the devices we have selected for comparison.

	Wiko View 2 Pro	Xiaomi Redmi Note 5	Motorola Moto G6	ZTE Blade V9	Huawei Honor 7X	Samsung Galaxy A6 2018	Average 64 GB eMMC Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		16%	124%	0%	18%	-10%	59%	1044%
Sequential Read 256KB	265.4	287.6 8%	238.2 -10%	265.4 0%	265.3 0%	208.4 -21%	273 ?(95.6 - 704, n=200) 3%	1230 ?(215 - 4512, n=237, last 2 years) 363%
Sequential Write 256KB	194.3	121.6 -37%	117.2 -40%	119.4 -39%	127.9 -34%	100.6 -48%	176.6 ?(40 - 274, n=200) -9%	819 ?(57.5 - 3062, n=237, last 2 years) 322%
Random Read 4KB	65.6	48.9 -25%	69.9 7%	29.81 -55%	81.4 24%	24.54 -63%	59.1 ?(9.58 - 148.5, n=200) -10%	215 ?(22.2 - 543, n=237, last 2 years) 228%
Random Write 4KB	6.72	16.3 143%	59.9 791%	12.47 86%	20.24 201%	10.68 59%	31.7 ?(2.34 - 146.9, n=200) 372%	226 ?(13 - 572, n=238, last 2 years) 3263%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	82.3 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	83.4 1%	75.3 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -9%	83.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 2%	52.7 -36%	81.4 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -1%	77.4 ?(21.1 - 107.6, n=144) -6%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	57.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	62.4 8%	61.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 6%	62.1 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 7%	30.55 -47%	65.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 14%	58.3 ?(11.2 - 83.3, n=144) 1%

Games - No "Back" with the Wiko smartphone

In our test device, a Qualcomm Adreno 506 graphics unit provides the necessary performance to render graphics-heavy apps and games. The games we tested - Temple Run 2 and Dead Trigger 2 - ran flawlessly and started without long load times. The controls on the touchscreen did not present us with any problems, and apps that make use of the position sensor worked cleanly as well. However, a bug in the software left us incapable of accessing the navigation buttons from within the games. The only way out was to hold down the power key until the Android controls appeared.

Emissions - Lukewarm and medium-loud

In everyday use, the Wiko View 2 Pro hardly seems to warm up at all—and our measurements verified this subjective impression. Under load, the surface temperatures reached a maximum of 32 °C (89.6 °F) and felt only about as warm as our hand. As a result, problems that arise when devices heat to high temperatures are not a concern for the Wiko View 2 Pro.

Max. Load

Idle


31.3 °C 88 F	30.7 °C 87 F	31.6 °C 89 F
31.6 °C 89 F	30.2 °C 86 F	31.6 °C 89 F
30.8 °C 87 F	30.3 °C 87 F	29.6 °C 85 F

Maximum: 31.6 °C = 89 F
Average: 30.9 °C = 88 F


27.8 °C 82 F	30.2 °C 86 F	30.2 °C 86 F
27.8 °C 82 F	29.4 °C 85 F	29.9 °C 86 F
28 °C 82 F	28.6 °C 83 F	29 °C 84 F

Maximum: 30.2 °C = 86 F
Average: 29 °C = 84 F

Power Supply (max.) 24.7 °C = 76 F | Room Temperature 21.5 °C = 71 F | Voltcraft IR-260

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30.9 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 31.6 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 30.2 °C / 86 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.9 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

Speakers

The Wiko smartphone's speakers only reach a moderate volume—though on the plus side, mid-range tones in particular are very balanced. Very high notes and bass notes are underrepresented, and the high and low tones that do appear buzz a little at maximum volume. The headset that comes with the smartphone can help somewhat here, though only high tones are present—which, fortunately, is sufficient for conversations. The headphones do not produce a good enough sound for listening to music, but other headsets or external speakers can be connected via the 3.5 mm jack.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Wiko View 2 Pro audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 43% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 39%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 63% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 26%, worst was 134%

Motorola Moto G6 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 39%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 26%, worst was 134%

Battery Life - Phone with long battery life

The Wiko View 2 Pro is more efficient with its energy usage than other devices in its price bracket, though it cannot keep up with the low levels of power draw achieved by other Snapdragon 450 smartphones. At a maximum power draw of 5 watts, the 10-watt power supply that comes with the device should have no problem charging the Wiko phone, no matter the circumstances.

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.01 / 0.16 Watt
Idle	0.64 / 2.07 / 2.13 Watt
Load	2.69 / 4.46 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Wiko View 2 Pro 3000 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 4000 mAh	Motorola Moto G6 3000 mAh	ZTE Blade V9 3200 mAh	Huawei Honor 7X 3340 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A6 2018 3000 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-58%	8%	4%	-37%	7%	-24%	-25%
Idle Minimum *	0.64	1 -56%	0.6 6%	0.71 -11%	1.02 -59%	0.81 -27%	0.794 ?(0.51 - 1.26, n=14) -24%	0.876 ?(0.12 - 2.37, n=166, last 2 years) -37%
Idle Average *	2.07	2.6 -26%	1.81 13%	1.73 16%	2.46 -19%	1.26 39%	2.27 ?(0.96 - 4.45, n=14) -10%	1.491 ?(0.69 - 4.26, n=166, last 2 years) 28%
Idle Maximum *	2.13	2.9 -36%	1.86 13%	1.78 16%	2.51 -18%	1.3 39%	2.48 ?(0.99 - 4.51, n=14) -16%	1.699 ?(0.79 - 4.45, n=166, last 2 years) 20%
Load Average *	2.69	5 -86%	2.78 -3%	2.74 -2%	4.16 -55%	2.87 -7%	3.95 ?(1.85 - 7.1, n=14) -47%	4.55 ?(2.1 - 10.9, n=166, last 2 years) -69%
Load Maximum *	4.46	8.2 -84%	4.04 9%	4.36 2%	5.87 -32%	4.82 -8%	5.38 ?(3.04 - 8.8, n=14) -21%	7.4 ?(3.56 - 13.7, n=166, last 2 years) -66%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Life

In our WLAN test, which is designed to simulate everyday use, the Wiko View 2 Pro ran for over 14 hours—leaving most of the competition behind. The power supply that comes with the smartphone fully charges the 3000 mAh battery in around two hours.

Battery Runtime


WiFi Websurfing		14h 17min

	Wiko View 2 Pro 3000 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 4000 mAh	Motorola Moto G6 3000 mAh	ZTE Blade V9 3200 mAh	Huawei Honor 7X 3340 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A6 2018 3000 mAh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3	857	872 2%	553 -35%	790 -8%	664 -23%	608 -29%

Pros

+ precise GPS

+ long battery life

+ bright display

Cons

- no USB Type-C

- slow WLAN

- no access to navigation keys within games

Verdict - Solid smartphone with good battery life

In review: Wiko View 2 Pro. Test device courtesy of: Wiko Germany

In our tests, the Wiko View 2 Pro proves to be a solid lower mid-range smartphone. The much-advertised camera does not offer the promised imaging performance, but it does produce somewhat better photos than many of its competitors. The system performance is appropriate for a smartphone with this hardware configuration.

The Wiko View 2 Pro is a solid mid-range smartphone that can hold its own among the competitors in its price bracket.

Primary concerns for interested customers may include the lack of a USB Type-C connection and the slow WLAN. On the other hand, the smartphone offers a very accurate GPS sensor and long battery life. In the end, personal taste plays a significant role in this price bracket, especially given that the Wiko View 2 Pro's notch design is executed somewhat clumsily.

Wiko View 2 Pro - 2018-06-29 06/29/2018 v6^(old)
Mike Wobker

Chassis

85%

Keyboard

69%

Pointing Device

90%

Connectivity

39%

Weight

91%

Battery

97 / 70 → 100%

Display

82%

Games Performance

27%

Application Performance

48 / 91 → 53%

Temperature

93%

Noise

100%

Audio

74%

Camera

58%

Average

73%

83%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Loading Comments

Comment on this article

Editor of the original article: Mike Faust - Senior Tech Writer - 424 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2017

I carried out my first IT experiments with a 386-based system and a whole 4 MB RAM. This was followed by work on various PCs and laptops that I maintained and repaired for friends and acquaintances. After training to become a Telecommunications Systems Technician and gaining a few years of experience, I graduated with a Bachelor’s degree in Industrial Engineering. Currently, I pursue my fascination for IT, technology, and mobile devices by writing reviews and articles for Notebookcheck. I have also worked for Gamestar, Netzwelt, and Golem, among others.

contact me via: @mornoc_mw, Xing

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Reviews > Wiko View 2 Pro Smartphone Review

Mike Wobker, 2018-07- 9 (Update: 2019-03- 9)

Wiko View 2 Pro Smartphone Review

Case - Wiko smartphone with glass-like finish

Size Comparison

Connectivity - Dual SIM Android phone

Software - Pure Android from Wiko

Communication and GPS - Smartphone for accurate location services

Phone Function and Speech Quality - Clear connection with the Android phone

Cameras - Android smartphone with dual cameras

Accessories and Warranty - MicroUSB and headset in the box

Input Devices and Operation - Smartphone with face-recognition

Display - Bright display with low contrast

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

Performance - Lower mid-range Wiko phone

Games - No "Back" with the Wiko smartphone

Emissions - Lukewarm and medium-loud

Speakers

Wiko View 2 Pro audio analysis

Motorola Moto G6 audio analysis

Battery Life - Phone with long battery life

Battery Life

Pros

Cons

Verdict - Solid smartphone with good battery life

More articles related to this device

Pricecompare