Wiko View 2 Pro
Specifications

Secondary Camera: 16 MPix f/2
Price comparison
Average of 14 scores (from 25 reviews)
Reviews for the Wiko View 2 Pro
Smartphone from the Mediterranean. From the sunny city of Marseille...the View 2 Pro, created by the French manufacturer Wiko, has found its way to our workbench. What makes the smartphone, priced at 300 Euros (~$350), stand out from other devices in its class? Read our review to find out.
Source: Blick
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/24/2018
Source: Tech Stage
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/02/2018
Source: Game IT
ES→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Good price; great display; compact size.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/23/2018
Source: Smartphone Italia
IT→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/08/2018
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 70% features: 80% display: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Androidiani
IT→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/31/2018
Rating: Total score: 70% features: 75% display: 65% mobility: 80% workmanship: 75% ergonomy: 70%
Source: AndroidPit.it
IT→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/03/2018
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Everyeye.it
IT→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/27/2018
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Techzilla.it
IT→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/26/2018
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 70% display: 60% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: HDblog.it
IT→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/20/2018
Rating: Total score: 72% price: 60% features: 76%
Source: Tutto Android
IT→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/02/2018
Rating: Total score: 73% price: 70% features: 70% display: 75% mobility: 85% ergonomy: 77%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi
IT→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/31/2018
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 70% display: 70% mobility: 84% workmanship: 88%
Source: AndroidWorld.it
IT→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/28/2018
Rating: Total score: 75% price: 75% features: 75% display: 75% mobility: 75% workmanship: 75% ergonomy: 75%
Source: Chimera Revo
IT→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Good price; nice cameras. Negative: Average performance; short battery life.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/04/2019
Source: Pianeta Cellulare
IT→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Low price; decent processor.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/28/2018
Source: Tecno Cino
IT→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Pleasant design; solid workmanship; nice display; good price; decent cameras. Negative: Only microUSB port; inflexible fingerprint sensor.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/05/2018
Source: Leonardo.it Tech
IT→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Good price; decent cameras; powerful processor; beautiful design.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/04/2018
Source: Smartphone Italia
IT→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Large screen; nice display; powerful hardware; excellent cameras; elegant design; metal case.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/04/2018
Source: Panorama
IT→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Good price; nice display.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 06/11/2018
Source: All About Phones
NL→EN Archive.org versionComparison, online available, Medium, Date: 03/06/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Fredzone
FR→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/22/2018
Rating: Total score: 73% price: 70% display: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 70% ergonomy: 70%
Source: AndroidPit.fr
FR→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/20/2018
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Frandroid
FR→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/10/2018
Rating: Total score: 60% performance: 60% display: 70% mobility: 60% workmanship: 70%
Source: Top for Phone
FR→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Impressive display; nice cameras; decent hardware. Negative: Relatively high price; low autonomy.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/22/2018
Source: Fredzone
FR→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Compact size; nice design; good built quality. Negative: Plastic case.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/20/2018
Source: Tabletowo
PL→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Decent cameras; fast fingerprint sensor; face ID; long battery life; support dual SIM; decent hardware. Negative: Poor display; mediocre speakers.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/05/2018
Comment
Qualcomm Adreno 506: Integrated graphics card in the Snapdragon 625 SoC and based on the new 500-series architecture with support for Vulkan, OpenGL ES 3.1 + AE (3.2) and UBWC.
Only some 3D games with very low demands are playable with these cards.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
SD 450: Lower mainstream octa-core ARM Cortex-A53 SoC clocked at up to 1.8 GHz and the Adreno 506 GPU, a LPDDR3 single channel memory controller as well as an X9 LTE (Cat. 7 300 / 150 Mbps) modem.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
