Wiko View 2 Pro
Specifications
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix f/2
Price comparison
Average of 14 scores (from 25 reviews)
Reviews for the Wiko View 2 Pro
Smartphone from the Mediterranean. From the sunny city of Marseille...the View 2 Pro, created by the French manufacturer Wiko, has found its way to our workbench. What makes the smartphone, priced at 300 Euros (~$350), stand out from other devices in its class? Read our review to find out.
Source: Blick DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/24/2018
Source: Tech Stage DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/02/2018
Source: Game IT ES→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; great display; compact size.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/23/2018
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/08/2018
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 70% features: 80% display: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Androidiani IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/31/2018
Rating: Total score: 70% features: 75% display: 65% mobility: 80% workmanship: 75% ergonomy: 70%
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/03/2018
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Everyeye.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/27/2018
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Techzilla.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/26/2018
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 70% display: 60% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: HDblog.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/20/2018
Rating: Total score: 72% price: 60% features: 76%
Source: Tutto Android IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/02/2018
Rating: Total score: 73% price: 70% features: 70% display: 75% mobility: 85% ergonomy: 77%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/31/2018
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 70% display: 70% mobility: 84% workmanship: 88%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/28/2018
Rating: Total score: 75% price: 75% features: 75% display: 75% mobility: 75% workmanship: 75% ergonomy: 75%
Source: Chimera Revo IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; nice cameras. Negative: Average performance; short battery life.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/04/2019
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Low price; decent processor.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/28/2018
Source: Tecno Cino IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Pleasant design; solid workmanship; nice display; good price; decent cameras. Negative: Only microUSB port; inflexible fingerprint sensor.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/05/2018
Source: Leonardo.it Tech IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; decent cameras; powerful processor; beautiful design.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/04/2018
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Large screen; nice display; powerful hardware; excellent cameras; elegant design; metal case.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/04/2018
Source: Panorama IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; nice display.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 06/11/2018
Source: All About Phones NL→EN Archive.org version
Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 03/06/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Fredzone FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/22/2018
Rating: Total score: 73% price: 70% display: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 70% ergonomy: 70%
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/20/2018
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Frandroid FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/10/2018
Rating: Total score: 60% performance: 60% display: 70% mobility: 60% workmanship: 70%
Source: Top for Phone FR→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Impressive display; nice cameras; decent hardware. Negative: Relatively high price; low autonomy.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/22/2018
Source: Fredzone FR→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Compact size; nice design; good built quality. Negative: Plastic case.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/20/2018
Source: Tabletowo PL→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Decent cameras; fast fingerprint sensor; face ID; long battery life; support dual SIM; decent hardware. Negative: Poor display; mediocre speakers.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/05/2018
Comment
Qualcomm Adreno 506: Integrated graphics card in the Snapdragon 625 SoC and based on the new 500-series architecture with support for Vulkan, OpenGL ES 3.1 + AE (3.2) and UBWC.
Only some 3D games with very low demands are playable with these cards.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
SD 450: Lower mainstream octa-core ARM Cortex-A53 SoC clocked at up to 1.8 GHz and the Adreno 506 GPU, a LPDDR3 single channel memory controller as well as an X9 LTE (Cat. 7 300 / 150 Mbps) modem.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
6.00":
It is a very small display format for smartphones. You should by no means be mis-sighted and you will generally see very little on the screen and only have a small resolution available. In return, the device should be very small and handy.
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.Wiko:
Wiko SAS was founded as a French smartphone manufacturer in 2011. Since 2014, the Chinese technology group Tinno Mobile has owned a majority of Wiko. They produce in China. The company has already reached a considerable market share in the French market in early years and expanded to Europe and Africa later on. Nevertheless, the world market share is low.
Reviews are only available since 2014, that is since the first international expansion. Recently, the number of reviews has increased. The ratings are average (as of 2016).
72.2%: This rating is poor. More than three quarters of the models are rated better. That is rather not a purchase recommendation. Even if verbal ratings in this area do not sound that bad ("sufficient" or "satisfactory"), they are usually euphemisms that disguise a classification as a below-average laptop.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.