Secondary Camera: 16 MPix
Average of 4 scores (from 7 reviews)
Reviews for the Oppo AX7
Source: Good Gear Guide
Unless you’re particularly spurred by the choice to feature a teardrop-style notch and more-powerful front-facing camera over the traditional wedge found in the AX5, there’s not a huge number of reasons to opt for this device over its predecessor.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/05/2019
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Gadget Diary
It is a great, honest entry level phone with features well about its price. Add OPPO’s superb construction, Canstar customer satisfaction rating, and excellent local support, and it is another winner.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/14/2019
Source: HDblog.it IT→EN
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/19/2019
Rating: Total score: 69%
Source: Computer Totaal NL→EN
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/18/2019
Rating: Total score: 40%
Source: Frandroid FR→EN
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/17/2019
Rating: Total score: 50% performance: 40% display: 50% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: Mega Obzor RU→EN
Positive: Excellent autonomy; modern design; nice display. Negative: Weak processor; poor cameras; no NFC.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/10/2019
Source: DGL.ru RU→EN
Positive: Nice design. Negative: Weak hardware; low performance.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/23/2019
CommentQualcomm Adreno 506: Integrated graphics card in the Snapdragon 625 SoC and based on the new 500-series architecture with support for Vulkan, OpenGL ES 3.1 + AE (3.2) and UBWC. Only some 3D games with very low demands are playable with these cards. » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
450: Lower mainstream octa-core ARM Cortex-A53 SoC clocked at up to 1.8 GHz and the Adreno 506 GPU, a LPDDR3 single channel memory controller as well as an X9 LTE (Cat. 7 300 / 150 Mbps) modem.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
Only a few smartphones have larger screens.
Large display-sizes allow higher resolutions. So, details like letters are bigger. On the other hand, the power consumption is lower with small screen diagonals and the devices are smaller, more lightweight and cheaper.
Only few smartphones are more lightweight than this.
58.5%: Such a bad rating is rare. There exist hardly any notebooks, which are rated worse.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.