Oppo AX7
Specifications
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix
Pricecompare
Average of 5 scores (from 9 reviews)
Reviews for the Oppo AX7
Source: Good Gear Guide Archive.org version
Unless you’re particularly spurred by the choice to feature a teardrop-style notch and more-powerful front-facing camera over the traditional wedge found in the AX5, there’s not a huge number of reasons to opt for this device over its predecessor.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/05/2019
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Gadget Diary Archive.org version
It is a great, honest entry level phone with features well about its price. Add OPPO’s superb construction, Canstar customer satisfaction rating, and excellent local support, and it is another winner.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/14/2019
Foreign Reviews
Source: Tutto Android IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/09/2019
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 65% features: 70% display: 70% mobility: 86% ergonomy: 80%
Source: HDblog.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/19/2019
Rating: Total score: 69%
Source: Computer Totaal NL→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/18/2019
Rating: Total score: 40%
Source: Frandroid FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/17/2019
Rating: Total score: 50% performance: 40% display: 50% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: DGL.ru RU→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Long battery life; elegant design. Negative: No NFC; high price.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/02/2019
Source: Mega Obzor RU→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Excellent autonomy; modern design; nice display. Negative: Weak processor; poor cameras; no NFC.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/10/2019
Source: DGL.ru RU→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Nice design. Negative: Weak hardware; low performance.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/23/2019
Comment
Qualcomm Adreno 506: Integrated graphics card in the Snapdragon 625 SoC and based on the new 500-series architecture with support for Vulkan, OpenGL ES 3.1 + AE (3.2) and UBWC.
Only some 3D games with very low demands are playable with these cards.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
SD 450: Lower mainstream octa-core ARM Cortex-A53 SoC clocked at up to 1.8 GHz and the Adreno 506 GPU, a LPDDR3 single channel memory controller as well as an X9 LTE (Cat. 7 300 / 150 Mbps) modem.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
6.20":
It is a small display format for smartphones. You shouldn't be severely defective in vision, and you won't see much detail on the screen and only have a small resolution available. For that, the device should be small and handy, easy to transport.
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.60.8%: Such a poor rating is rare. There are only a few notebooks that were rated even worse. The rating websites do not give a purchase recommendation here.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.