Wiko View 2 Plus
Specifications
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix , f/2.0
Price comparison
Average of 10 scores (from 13 reviews)
Reviews for the Wiko View 2 Plus
The Wiko View 2 Plus picks up on many of last year’s smartphone trends and combines them in an affordable package. The View 2 Plus integrates a dual rear-facing camera system and a large battery among other things, but its imposing notch may put off some potential buyers.
Source: El Androide Libre ES→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Beautiful design; nice performance; long battery life.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/12/2018
Source: PC Guia PT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 02/10/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/13/2018
Rating: Total score: 73% price: 65% features: 70% display: 70% mobility: 85% workmanship: 75% ergonomy: 75%
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/27/2018
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Panorama IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Nice design; great built quality; attractive price; decent cameras.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/16/2018
Source: HDblog.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; long battery life; nice design; good display. Negative: Only microUSB; no NFC.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/07/2018
Source: Tablets Magazine NL→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/12/2018
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: AndroidWorld.nl NL→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/11/2018
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Computer Totaal NL→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/10/2018
Rating: Total score: 62%
Source: 01Net FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/26/2018
Rating: Total score: 76% performance: 50% mobility: 100%
Source: Frandroid FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/01/2018
Rating: Total score: 50% performance: 40% display: 60% mobility: 70% workmanship: 40%
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/14/2018
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Top for Phone FR→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Attractive price; nice design; high performance; great cameras; decent autonomy. Negative: No NFC chip; poor display.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/23/2019
Comment
Qualcomm Adreno 506: Integrated graphics card in the Snapdragon 625 SoC and based on the new 500-series architecture with support for Vulkan, OpenGL ES 3.1 + AE (3.2) and UBWC.
Only some 3D games with very low demands are playable with these cards.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
SD 450: Lower mainstream octa-core ARM Cortex-A53 SoC clocked at up to 1.8 GHz and the Adreno 506 GPU, a LPDDR3 single channel memory controller as well as an X9 LTE (Cat. 7 300 / 150 Mbps) modem.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
5.93":
It is a very small display format for smartphones. You should by no means be mis-sighted and you will generally see very little on the screen and only have a small resolution available. In return, the device should be very small and handy.
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.Wiko:
Wiko SAS was founded as a French smartphone manufacturer in 2011. Since 2014, the Chinese technology group Tinno Mobile has owned a majority of Wiko. They produce in China. The company has already reached a considerable market share in the French market in early years and expanded to Europe and Africa later on. Nevertheless, the world market share is low.
Reviews are only available since 2014, that is since the first international expansion. Recently, the number of reviews has increased. The ratings are average (as of 2016).
70.71%: This rating is poor. More than three quarters of the models are rated better. That is rather not a purchase recommendation. Even if verbal ratings in this area do not sound that bad ("sufficient" or "satisfactory"), they are usually euphemisms that disguise a classification as a below-average laptop.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.