Notebookcheck

Wiko View 3 Pro Smartphone Review

Mike Wobker, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by Stephanie Chamberlain), 06/05/2019

AI and triple-camera setup. Wiko is trying to significantly lower the price limit for smartphones with a triple-camera setup. At the same time, it is relying on many AI functions, a large amount of storage and an attractive design. In our review we will reveal what else the Wiko View 3 Pro offers for around 300 Euros (~$338).

Wiko View 3 Pro

Last year the French manufacturer had already made the attempt to put features of high-end phones inside mid-range smartphones, and to offer these at a budget price with the Wiko View 2 Pro. While the main focus back then was on a dual-camera setup, a large display and the very large notch in the display, prospective buyers are greeted this time by the Wiko View 3 Pro with a dewdrop notch, a 6.3-inch display and a triple-camera setup.

Instead of a Qualcomm SoC, Wiko opted this time for a Mediatek Helio P60 and offers 6 GB RAM. 128 GB eMMC flash storage is available for storing apps and data, and an ARM Mali-G72 MP3 brings graphic content to the large screen.

But for a price of about 300 Euros (~$338), the competition offers a wide range of options, which is why we will compare the Wiko View 3 Pro in our review to other devices with a similar price and performance. Among these we can find the Samsung Galaxy A50, the Sony Xperia 10, the Huawei P Smart Plus 2019, the Nokia 8.1 and the BQ Aquaris X2. Further smartphones from our database can be entered into any table and added to the selection.

Wiko View 3 Pro (View Series)
Graphics adapter
Memory
6144 MB 
Display
6.3 inch 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 409 PPI, capacitive, IPS, glossy: yes
Storage
128 GB eMMC Flash, 128 GB 
, 116 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm audio jack, Card Reader: microSD (FAT, FAT32, up to 512 GB), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyroscope, proximity sensor, eCompass, USB Type-C
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM/GPRS/EDGE (850/900/1800/1900 MHz), 3G UMTS (850/900/1900/2100 MHz), 4G LTE (B1(2100)/B3(1800)/B5(850)/B7(2600)/B8(900)/B20(800)/B28(700)/B40(2300)) , Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.1 x 159.5 x 75 ( = 0.32 x 6.28 x 2.95 in)
Battery
4000 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix 13MP (f/1.7, 120°) + 12MP (f/2.4, 1.25µm) + 5MP (f/2.2)
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix f/2.0
Additional features
Speakers: 1 speaker, Keyboard: onscreen, USB power adapter, USB Type-C cable, Stereo-Headset, silicone cover, SIM needle, 24 Months Warranty, SAR value (head): 0.61 W/kg, SAR value (body): 1.5 W/kg, fanless
Weight
184 g ( = 6.49 oz / 0.41 pounds), Power Supply: 78 g ( = 2.75 oz / 0.17 pounds)
Price
300 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Working For Notebookcheck

Are you a techie who knows how to write? Then join our Team! Indian citizens welcome!

Currently wanted: 
News and Editorial Editor - Details here

Case - Wiko smartphone with color gradient

The Wiko View 3 Pro has a stable metal frame and a back side made of glass. The design features rounded edges and colors with a visible gradient. In our review model, the color on the frame goes from rose gold in the top to a dark blue in the bottom. The dark blue back side reflects incident light very strongly.

The View 3 Pro is also available in an alternative color described as Deep Bleen. This offers more of a turquoise tone of green, and it has elements that glow in the dark on the back side. The physical operation buttons are found on the right side of the device and sit firmly in their respective enclosures. The NanoSIM/microSD tray is placed on the left side.

In comparison to other smartphones of its class, the Wiko 3 Pro is the heaviest device in our test field with a weight of 184 grams (~6.5 oz). The physical dimensions are slightly larger too, but with a near bezel-less design a big proportion of the area is used by the display.

Wiko View 3 Pro
Wiko View 3 Pro
Wiko View 3 Pro
Wiko View 3 Pro
Wiko View 3 Pro

Size comparison

159.5 mm / 6.28 inch 75 mm / 2.95 inch 8.1 mm / 0.3189 inch 184 g0.4057 lbs158.5 mm / 6.24 inch 74.7 mm / 2.94 inch 7.7 mm / 0.3031 inch 166 g0.366 lbs156 mm / 6.14 inch 68 mm / 2.68 inch 8.4 mm / 0.3307 inch 162 g0.3571 lbs155.2 mm / 6.11 inch 73.4 mm / 2.89 inch 8 mm / 0.315 inch 160 g0.3527 lbs154.8 mm / 6.09 inch 75.8 mm / 2.98 inch 8 mm / 0.315 inch 180 g0.3968 lbs153 mm / 6.02 inch 72 mm / 2.83 inch 8.3 mm / 0.3268 inch 164 g0.3616 lbs150.7 mm / 5.93 inch 72.3 mm / 2.85 inch 8.3 mm / 0.3268 inch 163 g0.3594 lbs

Connectivity - Mid-range smartphone with large storage space

Wiko provided the View 3 Pro with a Mediatek Helio P60 SoC and an ARM Mali-G72 MP3 graphics unit. Together with 6 GB RAM and 128 GB internal eMMC flash storage this configuration already belongs to the upper mid-range. If the available storage becomes too scarce, this can be expanded by up to 512 GB with the use of a microSD card, according to the manufacturer. The exFAT format is not supported here. By using an external microSD card the dual-SIM function will be lost since the hybrid slot can only handle either a second NanoSIM or a memory card. Settings options for VoLTE or VoWLAN were not available to us in the View 3's menu.

Users have access to a USB Type-C port for wired data transfer, which is internally limited to the USB 2.0 standard though. Headphones and external speakers can be connected to the Wiko smartphone through a 3.5 mm audio jack. Since DRM-L1 is not supported, content from streaming services such as Netflix, Amazon Prime or Maxdome are not available in HD. The Camera2 API is also subject to slight restrictions with the value "Full".

Software - Smartphone with pure Android

The Wiko 3 Pro offers a near pure Android Pie system with version 9.0, and features security patches up to March 5th 2019. At the time of writing this review, an update with the security patch for April 5th 2019 was already available. The manufacturer has abstained itself from installing third-party apps, and it delivers the 6.3-inch smartphone with only the WiLine in-house app. With it, optional interactive covers can be connected to the smartphone and controlled.

Users can also download the Wiko Live Wallpaper app from the Google Play Store. The app allows for one-second clips to be created or extracted from already existing videos. These are then played as background image when switching screens. Using this for our review was very fun and made for a unique personalization. We must mention, however, that this functionality is also provided by third-party apps.

In the case that several users want to make use of the View 3 Pro, the settings menu allows the configuration of different accounts with this purpose. However, apps cannot be moved to an SD card when the remaining storage space is low, and the card cannot be reformatted as internal storage either.

Wiko View 3 Pro Software
Wiko View 3 Pro Software
Wiko View 3 Pro Software
Wiko View 3 Pro Software
Wiko View 3 Pro Software
Wiko View 3 Pro Software
Wiko View 3 Pro Software
Wiko View 3 Pro Software

Communication and GPS - Smartphone with NFC and good Wi-Fi

The Wiko View 3 Pro can establish a mobile radio connection in GSM, 3G and LTE networks. The latter is possible with category 7 LTE, whereby download speeds of up to 300 Mb/s and upload speeds of up to 150 Mb/s can be reached.

In close range, users have access to NFC, Bluetooth 4.2 and Wi-Fi supporting the 802.11 a, b, g, n and ac standards. On the other hand, users will have to do without 2x2 MIMO antennas. Nevertheless, the transfer speeds that we measured in our review are still very good. With our Linksys EA8500 reference router, the View 3 Pro reached speeds of up to 335 Mb/s for receiving and of up to 308 Mb/s for sending data. As a result, the large Android smartphone sits in one of the top spots of our test field and leaves a big part of the competition behind.

 

 

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mali-G72 MP3, Helio P60, 128 GB eMMC Flash
335 (min: 267, max: 343) MBit/s ∼100%
Sony Xperia 10
Adreno 508, 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash
334 (min: 326, max: 341) MBit/s ∼100% 0%
Nokia 8.1
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
312 (min: 273, max: 341) MBit/s ∼93% -7%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9610, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
294 (min: 278, max: 302) MBit/s ∼88% -12%
BQ Aquaris X2
Adreno 509, 636, 32 GB eMMC Flash
275 MBit/s ∼82% -18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=423)
224 MBit/s ∼67% -33%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
167 (min: 108, max: 214) MBit/s ∼50% -50%
Wiko View 2 Pro
Adreno 506, 450, 64 GB eMMC Flash
43 MBit/s ∼13% -87%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
BQ Aquaris X2
Adreno 509, 636, 32 GB eMMC Flash
322 (min: 275) MBit/s ∼100% +5%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mali-G72 MP3, Helio P60, 128 GB eMMC Flash
308 (min: 302, max: 312) MBit/s ∼96%
Nokia 8.1
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
300 (min: 169, max: 367) MBit/s ∼93% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9610, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
272 (min: 250, max: 285) MBit/s ∼84% -12%
Sony Xperia 10
Adreno 508, 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash
253 (min: 128, max: 283) MBit/s ∼79% -18%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
221 (min: 157, max: 243) MBit/s ∼69% -28%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=423)
214 MBit/s ∼66% -31%
Wiko View 2 Pro
Adreno 506, 450, 64 GB eMMC Flash
47.6 MBit/s ∼15% -85%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø330 (267-343)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø308 (302-312)
GPS test outdoors
GPS test outdoors
GPS test indoors
GPS test indoors

We verify how well the Wiko View 3 Pro can determine its location by using the GPS Test app. The Android smartphone has access to GPS, BeiDou, GLOSNASS and Galileo, whereby we were able to achieve an accuracy of 4 meters (~13 feet) outdoors. On the contrary, establishing a satellite connection was not possible indoors.

In our mandatory bike ride we compare the View 3 Pro with our reference device, the Garmin Edge 500. The registered route on long straight paths often lies next to the actual route, but curves and sudden changes in direction are registered quite well. Therefore the Wiko View 3 Pro is better suited for simple navigation tasks.

GNSS - Wiko View 3 Pro
GNSS - Wiko View 3 Pro
GNSS - Wiko View 3 Pro
GNSS - Wiko View 3 Pro
GNSS - Wiko View 3 Pro
GNSS - Wiko View 3 Pro
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500

Telephone and call quality - Good connection with Wiko View 3 Pro

The Wiko View 3 Pro provides users with Google's standard phone app. This offers a direct view of favorites and allows the quick display of a number keypad. Two other tabs lead to recent calls and all contacts. The Wiko View 3 Pro showed good volume during phone calls, and it filtered ambient noises reliably. Both parties at either side of the conversation are easily understood, and communication is only hindered in loud environments such as busy streets. The included stereo headset can remedy this situation since it protects users better from ambient noises.

Cameras - Budget smartphone with triple-camera setup

Front camera sample
Front camera sample

Wiko has equipped the View 3 Pro with a triple-camera setup in the back side. This provides a 13MP sensor with an aperture of f/1.7 and a 120 ° wide angle, a 12MP sensor with an f/2.4 aperture and a pixel pitch of 1.25 µm, as well as a 5MP sensor with an aperture of f/2.2. There is also a 16MP front camera with an f/2.0 aperture available for portrait photos. This produces selfies of medium quality. Fine details and structures are well captured, but bright areas in photos look excessively bright and unnatural compared to dark colors. Users can influence the quality of photos with the camera app by applying an AI-driven beautifying effect or by regulating the background sharpness with a freely programmable scale. With the exception of color filters and HDR, there are no further functions with which the results can be adjusted.

The main camera in the Wiko View 3 Pro benefits greatly from good lighting conditions. Panoramic images taken on dull days look somewhat dark, whereby many details lack sharpness. The difference between bright and dark image areas is very noticeable here too, creating very bright and comparatively dark spots in the photo. However, strong colors are captured quite well. The excessive emphasis on bright image areas continues to be present in close-ups, whereby colors are also well reproduced here. Fine details and structures can be identified easily as well, and object edges are clearly differentiated from one another. The Wiko View 3 Pro does not produce any usable photos in low light. Even the outlines of objects in the image and the sparse light source are barely identifiable in the test subject that we chose. Alongside the already mentioned adjustment options for the front camera, the camera app allows the use of a wide-angle mode and of Google Lens on objects shown in the view finder. A pro mode or something similar is not offered by the Wiko View 3 Pro.

Videos recorded in movement result in a similar quality to the one found in our sample photos. An image stabilizer takes care of evening out camera shake, and the resolution can be set to 720p, 1080p or to the full screen format of the smartphone's display. However, the device does not provide a high-frame-rate mode nor any other adjustment options.

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
ColorChecker Passport
ColorChecker Passport

We verify how well the camera in the Wiko View 3 Pro can capture colors with the ColorChecker Passport. It is shown here that colors appear lighter than they should. On the other hand, gray tones appear darker than in the template.

The Wiko smartphone can reproduce the test chart well under controlled lighting conditions. Fine details and structures can be easily identified, colors look a bit light though. In addition, there is a slight paleness in the lower corners.

Wiko View 3 Pro - Test chart
Wiko View 3 Pro - Test chart (detail)

Accessories and warranty - Smartphone with stereo headset out of the box

WiLine smart folio
WiLine smart folio

The Wiko 3 Pro includes in the box a USB power adapter with a corresponding USB Type-C cable, a silicone cover, a stereo headset and a SIM needle. Further accessories such as the interactive WiLine smart folio cover can be found on the manufacturer's website.

Wiko honors a 24-month warranty on the View 3 Pro. Further information on this can be found in our FAQ about Guarantees, Return policies and Warranties.

Input devices and handling - Good touchscreen with smooth surface

For text input, users of the View 3 Pro will find Google's standard keyboard app, Gboard. Long sentences can be entered quickly and easily with it, whereby the touchscreen reacts reliably to every input. The smooth surface allows for trouble-free drag-and-drop operations.

The Wiko smartphone can be unlocked without issues through the fingerprint scanner in the back. Saved fingerprints are identified quickly, and we rarely needed to use our fingerprint for a second time to unlock the phone during our review.

Display - Wiko View 3 Pro with 6.3-inch display

Subpixel
Subpixel

The display in the Wiko View 3 Pro is made of a 6.3-inch IPS panel and offers a resolution of 2340x1080 pixels. The maximum brightness is 465 cd/m², without using the sensor, and 461 cd/m² in the APL50 test. As a result, brightness sits below the comparison devices in our test field, and even the previous model, the Wiko View 2 Pro, provided higher brightness. The brightness distribution is also only below average with 87%. In return, there is no PWM being used to control brightness, which means that even users with sensitive eyes do not have to fear any problems with the use of the Wiko smartphone.

441
cd/m²
462
cd/m²
453
cd/m²
431
cd/m²
459
cd/m²
466
cd/m²
421
cd/m²
458
cd/m²
459
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 466 cd/m² Average: 450 cd/m² Minimum: 8.54 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 459 cd/m²
Contrast: 1177:1 (Black: 0.39 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.8 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6
ΔE Greyscale 5.5 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.26
Wiko View 3 Pro
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.3
Wiko View 2 Pro
IPS, 1528x720, 6
BQ Aquaris X2
IPS LCD, 2160x1080, 5.65
Sony Xperia 10
IPS-LCD, 2520x1080, 6
Nokia 8.1
IPS, 2246x1080, 6.18
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.21
Samsung Galaxy A50
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.4
Screen
-30%
1%
10%
2%
35%
30%
Brightness middle
459
562
22%
631
37%
547
19%
567
24%
427
-7%
644
40%
Brightness
450
541
20%
622
38%
525
17%
547
22%
415
-8%
628
40%
Brightness Distribution
90
92
2%
96
7%
93
3%
92
2%
84
-7%
91
1%
Black Level *
0.39
0.56
-44%
0.61
-56%
0.36
8%
0.61
-56%
0.2
49%
Contrast
1177
1004
-15%
1034
-12%
1519
29%
930
-21%
2135
81%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.8
7.9
-65%
5.5
-15%
4.6
4%
4.39
9%
1.95
59%
2.64
45%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
9.2
15.7
-71%
8.5
8%
12.1
-32%
7.28
21%
4.47
51%
9.23
-0%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
5.5
10.4
-89%
5.6
-2%
3.9
29%
4.9
11%
2.3
58%
2.5
55%
Gamma
2.26 97%
2.02 109%
2.38 92%
2.17 101%
2.248 98%
2.07 106%
2.024 109%
CCT
7494 87%
8834 74%
7531 86%
7158 91%
7642 85%
6414 101%
6649 98%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9394 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Our measurements show that the View 3 Pro has a contrast ratio of 1177:1 and a slightly high black value of 0.39 cd/m². The latter was even higher in our APL50 test with a value of 0.52 cd/m², which also visibly decreased contrast. This dropped to a value around 887:1 (APL50), whereby colors are not well separated from each other, and black image areas are covered by a gray veil.

Furthermore, the CalMAN analysis shows that the display in the Wiko smartphone has a clear blue tint. Color reproduction can be made warmer or colder through a freely programmable scale found in the settings menu, and a night light mode adds a noticeable yellow tint to the image.

CalMAN - Color accuracy
CalMAN - Color accuracy
CalMAN - Color-space
CalMAN - Color-space
CalMAN - Grayscales
CalMAN - Grayscales
CalMAN - Saturation
CalMAN - Saturation

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
30.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 14.4 ms rise
↘ 16.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 78 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (25 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
50.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 24.4 ms rise
↘ 26.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 85 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (39.8 ms).

The Wiko View 3 Pro can be used outdoors without issues as long as sunny areas are avoided. The provided brightness is enough for the content in the display to be readable. However, surrounding objects are quickly reflected under oblique viewing angles, which severely impairs the view of the display.

Outdoor use
Outdoor use
Outdoor use
Outdoor use

The IPS panel in the Wiko smartphone has very stable viewing angles, which makes the display readable from almost any angle without it showing any distortions or color shifts. As long as the view of the display is not hindered by reflections of surrounding objects, the View 3 Pro can even be used from unusual positions.

Viewing angle stability
Viewing angle stability
Viewing angle stability
Viewing angle stability

Performance - Wiko smartphone with good performance

The Wiko View 3 Pro provides a configuration belonging to the upper mid-range with the use of a Mediatek Helio P60, an ARM Mali-G72 MP3 graphics unit, 6 GB RAM and 128 GB internal eMMC flash storage. This makes it suitable for diverse applications, which go beyond everyday apps like WhatsApp, Netflix and Internet browsers.

In our benchmark tests, the Wiko smartphone achieved results, which allow it to ensure itself a solid position in the upper range of our test field. The pure system performance is often enough to come out in first place, but smartphones like the Nokia 8.1 or the Samsung Galaxy A50 are one step ahead when it comes to graphically intensive tests.

Geekbench 4.4
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
5309 Points ∼78%
BQ Aquaris X2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
4309 Points ∼63% -19%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
3763 Points ∼55% -29%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
6813 Points ∼100% +28%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
3133 Points ∼46% -41%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
4913 Points ∼72% -7%
Wiko View 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 4096
3362 Points ∼49% -37%
Average Mediatek Helio P60
  (5172 - 5309, n=2)
5241 Points ∼77% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=317)
4676 Points ∼69% -12%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
5743 Points ∼98%
BQ Aquaris X2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
4974 Points ∼85% -13%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
3986 Points ∼68% -31%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
5856 Points ∼100% +2%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
5426 Points ∼93% -6%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
5605 Points ∼96% -2%
Wiko View 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 4096
4022 Points ∼69% -30%
Average Mediatek Helio P60
  (5554 - 5743, n=2)
5649 Points ∼96% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (883 - 11598, n=376)
4682 Points ∼80% -18%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1487 Points ∼83%
BQ Aquaris X2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1323 Points ∼74% -11%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
837 Points ∼47% -44%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1799 Points ∼100% +21%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
1539 Points ∼86% +3%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1721 Points ∼96% +16%
Wiko View 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 4096
778 Points ∼43% -48%
Average Mediatek Helio P60
  (1472 - 1487, n=2)
1480 Points ∼82% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (390 - 4824, n=376)
1413 Points ∼79% -5%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
7486 Points ∼100%
BQ Aquaris X2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
5706 Points ∼76% -24%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
5987 Points ∼80% -20%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
6887 Points ∼92% -8%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
5855 Points ∼78% -22%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
5827 Points ∼78% -22%
Wiko View 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 4096
4637 Points ∼62% -38%
Average Mediatek Helio P60
  (6950 - 7486, n=5)
7255 Points ∼97% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 11440, n=367)
5225 Points ∼70% -30%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
10757 Points ∼100%
BQ Aquaris X2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6437 Points ∼60% -40%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
4948 Points ∼46% -54%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
8309 Points ∼77% -23%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
7004 Points ∼65% -35%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
7029 Points ∼65% -35%
Wiko View 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 4096
5395 Points ∼50% -50%
Average Mediatek Helio P60
  (9065 - 10757, n=5)
9884 Points ∼92% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 14439, n=538)
5652 Points ∼53% -47%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2518 Points ∼94%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
2167 Points ∼81% -14%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
2272 Points ∼85% -10%
Average Mediatek Helio P60
 
2518 Points ∼94% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 15735, n=54)
2680 Points ∼100% +6%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
997 Points ∼37%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
693 Points ∼26% -30%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
1121 Points ∼42% +12%
Average Mediatek Helio P60
 
997 Points ∼37% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 14536, n=54)
2699 Points ∼100% +171%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1152 Points ∼47%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
861 Points ∼35% -25%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
1263 Points ∼51% +10%
Average Mediatek Helio P60
 
1152 Points ∼47% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 14786, n=54)
2460 Points ∼100% +114%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2918 Points ∼100%
BQ Aquaris X2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2396 Points ∼82% -18%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1664 Points ∼57% -43%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2534 Points ∼87% -13%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
2006 Points ∼69% -31%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2266 Points ∼78% -22%
Wiko View 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 4096
1808 Points ∼62% -38%
Average Mediatek Helio P60
  (2013 - 2918, n=5)
2520 Points ∼86% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 4535, n=373)
1938 Points ∼66% -34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
993 Points ∼54%
BQ Aquaris X2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
872 Points ∼47% -12%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
792 Points ∼43% -20%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1845 Points ∼100% +86%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
770 Points ∼42% -22%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1188 Points ∼64% +20%
Wiko View 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 4096
415 Points ∼22% -58%
Average Mediatek Helio P60
  (721 - 993, n=5)
875 Points ∼47% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 8206, n=373)
1701 Points ∼92% +71%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1164 Points ∼59%
BQ Aquaris X2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1016 Points ∼52% -13%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
896 Points ∼46% -23%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1964 Points ∼100% +69%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
892 Points ∼45% -23%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1328 Points ∼68% +14%
Wiko View 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 4096
501 Points ∼26% -57%
Average Mediatek Helio P60
  (853 - 1164, n=5)
1023 Points ∼52% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 6312, n=374)
1589 Points ∼81% +37%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2924 Points ∼100%
BQ Aquaris X2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2359 Points ∼81% -19%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1732 Points ∼59% -41%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2516 Points ∼86% -14%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
1887 Points ∼65% -35%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2241 Points ∼77% -23%
Wiko View 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 4096
1810 Points ∼62% -38%
Average Mediatek Helio P60
  (2388 - 2924, n=4)
2711 Points ∼93% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 4703, n=401)
1848 Points ∼63% -37%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1605 Points ∼56%
BQ Aquaris X2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1402 Points ∼49% -13%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1299 Points ∼45% -19%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2855 Points ∼100% +78%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
1065 Points ∼37% -34%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1553 Points ∼54% -3%
Wiko View 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 4096
716 Points ∼25% -55%
Average Mediatek Helio P60
  (1159 - 1605, n=4)
1407 Points ∼49% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 14951, n=401)
2227 Points ∼78% +39%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1784 Points ∼64%
BQ Aquaris X2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1540 Points ∼56% -14%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1375 Points ∼50% -23%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2772 Points ∼100% +55%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
1179 Points ∼43% -34%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1667 Points ∼60% -7%
Wiko View 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 4096
827 Points ∼30% -54%
Average Mediatek Helio P60
  (1309 - 1784, n=4)
1567 Points ∼57% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 8141, n=401)
1905 Points ∼69% +7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2528 Points ∼100%
BQ Aquaris X2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2353 Points ∼93% -7%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1645 Points ∼65% -35%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2514 Points ∼99% -1%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
2246 Points ∼89% -11%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2351 Points ∼93% -7%
Wiko View 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 4096
1855 Points ∼73% -27%
Average Mediatek Helio P60
  (2149 - 2528, n=5)
2434 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (486 - 4320, n=452)
1844 Points ∼73% -27%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
986 Points ∼58%
BQ Aquaris X2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
816 Points ∼48% -17%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
704 Points ∼41% -29%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1702 Points ∼100% +73%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
692 Points ∼41% -30%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1149 Points ∼68% +17%
Wiko View 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 4096
369 Points ∼22% -63%
Average Mediatek Helio P60
  (628 - 986, n=5)
790 Points ∼46% -20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 6362, n=452)
1404 Points ∼82% +42%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1141 Points ∼62%
BQ Aquaris X2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
955 Points ∼52% -16%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
809 Points ∼44% -29%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1834 Points ∼100% +61%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
818 Points ∼45% -28%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1296 Points ∼71% +14%
Wiko View 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 4096
449 Points ∼24% -61%
Average Mediatek Helio P60
  (733 - 1141, n=5)
924 Points ∼50% -19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 5734, n=453)
1357 Points ∼74% +19%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2720 Points ∼100%
BQ Aquaris X2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2338 Points ∼86% -14%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1687 Points ∼62% -38%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2467 Points ∼91% -9%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
2307 Points ∼85% -15%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2432 Points ∼89% -11%
Wiko View 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 4096
1833 Points ∼67% -33%
Average Mediatek Helio P60
  (2159 - 2720, n=4)
2494 Points ∼92% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 4454, n=494)
1714 Points ∼63% -37%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1593 Points ∼58%
BQ Aquaris X2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1337 Points ∼48% -16%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1235 Points ∼45% -22%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2763 Points ∼100% +73%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
744 Points ∼27% -53%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1279 Points ∼46% -20%
Wiko View 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 4096
706 Points ∼26% -56%
Average Mediatek Helio P60
  (861 - 1593, n=4)
1137 Points ∼41% -29%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 10008, n=493)
1844 Points ∼67% +16%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1755 Points ∼65%
BQ Aquaris X2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1478 Points ∼55% -16%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1315 Points ∼49% -25%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2691 Points ∼100% +53%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
876 Points ∼33% -50%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1430 Points ∼53% -19%
Wiko View 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 4096
818 Points ∼30% -53%
Average Mediatek Helio P60
  (1008 - 1755, n=4)
1289 Points ∼48% -27%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 7820, n=496)
1603 Points ∼60% -9%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
24165 Points ∼100%
BQ Aquaris X2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
16747 Points ∼69% -31%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
12437 Points ∼51% -49%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
14820 Points ∼61% -39%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
14353 Points ∼59% -41%
Wiko View 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 4096
15177 Points ∼63% -37%
Average Mediatek Helio P60
  (18065 - 24828, n=5)
22578 Points ∼93% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 45072, n=653)
13917 Points ∼58% -42%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
21847 Points ∼55%
BQ Aquaris X2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
20806 Points ∼52% -5%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
17878 Points ∼45% -18%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
39655 Points ∼100% +82%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
16593 Points ∼42% -24%
Wiko View 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 4096
12550 Points ∼32% -43%
Average Mediatek Helio P60
  (16820 - 21847, n=5)
19897 Points ∼50% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 162695, n=651)
20570 Points ∼52% -6%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
22323 Points ∼77%
BQ Aquaris X2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
19743 Points ∼68% -12%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
16290 Points ∼56% -27%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
28895 Points ∼100% +29%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
16037 Points ∼56% -28%
Wiko View 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 4096
12878 Points ∼45% -42%
Average Mediatek Helio P60
  (17082 - 22323, n=5)
20432 Points ∼71% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 83518, n=651)
17077 Points ∼59% -24%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
38 fps ∼58%
BQ Aquaris X2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
36 fps ∼55% -5%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
29 fps ∼45% -24%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
65 fps ∼100% +71%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
34 fps ∼52% -11%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
39 fps ∼60% +3%
Wiko View 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 4096
22 fps ∼34% -42%
Average Mediatek Helio P60
  (30 - 38, n=5)
35.4 fps ∼54% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 251, n=675)
36 fps ∼55% -5%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
34 fps ∼60%
BQ Aquaris X2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
34 fps ∼60% 0%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
25 fps ∼44% -26%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
57 fps ∼100% +68%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
32 fps ∼56% -6%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
36 fps ∼63% +6%
Wiko View 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 4096
33 fps ∼58% -3%
Average Mediatek Helio P60
  (31 - 40, n=5)
34.4 fps ∼60% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 120, n=684)
27.6 fps ∼48% -19%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
20 fps ∼63%
BQ Aquaris X2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
16 fps ∼50% -20%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
13 fps ∼41% -35%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
32 fps ∼100% +60%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
19 fps ∼59% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
23 fps ∼72% +15%
Wiko View 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 4096
9.4 fps ∼29% -53%
Average Mediatek Helio P60
  (16 - 20, n=5)
18.8 fps ∼59% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 132, n=581)
20.5 fps ∼64% +3%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
19 fps ∼61%
BQ Aquaris X2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
15 fps ∼48% -21%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
11 fps ∼35% -42%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
31 fps ∼100% +63%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
17 fps ∼55% -11%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
21 fps ∼68% +11%
Wiko View 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 4096
17 fps ∼55% -11%
Average Mediatek Helio P60
  (17 - 29, n=5)
20.4 fps ∼66% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=590)
18.9 fps ∼61% -1%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
12 fps ∼52%
BQ Aquaris X2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
10 fps ∼43% -17%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
9.5 fps ∼41% -21%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
23 fps ∼100% +92%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
13 fps ∼57% +8%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
14 fps ∼61% +17%
Wiko View 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 4096
6.1 fps ∼27% -49%
Average Mediatek Helio P60
  (9.6 - 12, n=5)
11.5 fps ∼50% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 88, n=447)
16.8 fps ∼73% +40%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
11 fps ∼50%
BQ Aquaris X2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
9.8 fps ∼45% -11%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
7.8 fps ∼35% -29%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
22 fps ∼100% +100%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
12 fps ∼55% +9%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
13 fps ∼59% +18%
Wiko View 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 4096
12 fps ∼55% +9%
Average Mediatek Helio P60
  (11 - 20, n=5)
12.8 fps ∼58% +16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=449)
16.2 fps ∼74% +47%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
4.3 fps ∼46%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
2.7 fps ∼29% -37%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
8.2 fps ∼88% +91%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
4.1 fps ∼44% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
4.9 fps ∼52% +14%
Average Mediatek Helio P60
  (2.6 - 6.4, n=4)
4.35 fps ∼46% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 59, n=165)
9.37 fps ∼100% +118%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2.7 fps ∼41%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1.7 fps ∼26% -37%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
5 fps ∼76% +85%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
2.6 fps ∼40% -4%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
3.1 fps ∼47% +15%
Average Mediatek Helio P60
  (2.1 - 4.3, n=4)
2.93 fps ∼45% +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 31, n=164)
6.54 fps ∼100% +142%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
7 fps ∼50%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
4.4 fps ∼32% -37%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
13 fps ∼94% +86%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
6.9 fps ∼50% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
8.2 fps ∼59% +17%
Average Mediatek Helio P60
  (6.6 - 8.6, n=4)
7.28 fps ∼52% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 59, n=169)
13.9 fps ∼100% +99%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
7.5 fps ∼49%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
4.9 fps ∼32% -35%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
14 fps ∼92% +87%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
6.4 fps ∼42% -15%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
9 fps ∼59% +20%
Average Mediatek Helio P60
  (6.2 - 7.6, n=4)
7.13 fps ∼47% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 63, n=169)
15.3 fps ∼100% +104%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
7.4 fps ∼57%
BQ Aquaris X2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6.3 fps ∼48% -15%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
5.3 fps ∼41% -28%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
13 fps ∼100% +76%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
7.7 fps ∼59% +4%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
8.9 fps ∼68% +20%
Wiko View 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 4096
3.5 fps ∼27% -53%
Average Mediatek Helio P60
  (5.8 - 7.4, n=5)
6.92 fps ∼53% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 54, n=372)
11.5 fps ∼88% +55%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
6.8 fps ∼57%
BQ Aquaris X2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6 fps ∼50% -12%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
4.3 fps ∼36% -37%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
12 fps ∼100% +76%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
6.8 fps ∼57% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
8.1 fps ∼68% +19%
Wiko View 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 4096
6.6 fps ∼55% -3%
Average Mediatek Helio P60
  (6.7 - 7.4, n=5)
6.98 fps ∼58% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 58, n=376)
10.4 fps ∼87% +53%
Basemark GPU
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
7.5 fps ∼44%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
14.3 fps ∼84%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
14.51 fps ∼85%
Average Mediatek Helio P60
  (7.98 - 11.7, n=2)
9.84 fps ∼58%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.24 - 37.4, n=59)
17 fps ∼100%
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6.63 fps ∼47%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
12.1 fps ∼85%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
11.59 fps ∼82%
Average Mediatek Helio P60
 
7.78 fps ∼55%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.57 - 37.3, n=53)
14.2 fps ∼100%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
13 fps ∼74%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
13.03 fps ∼74%
Average Mediatek Helio P60
 
8.99 fps ∼51%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.88 - 39.7, n=50)
17.5 fps ∼100%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
138589 Points ∼82%
BQ Aquaris X2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
116748 Points ∼69% -16%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
88287 Points ∼52% -36%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
169262 Points ∼100% +22%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
124870 Points ∼74% -10%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
144194 Points ∼85% +4%
Wiko View 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 4096
69661 Points ∼41% -50%
Average Mediatek Helio P60
  (119367 - 138589, n=5)
131946 Points ∼78% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (17073 - 398720, n=283)
136819 Points ∼81% -1%
VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
681 Score ∼32%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1681 Score ∼79%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1656 Score ∼77%
Average Mediatek Helio P60
  (1029 - 1119, n=2)
1074 Score ∼50%
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 5025, n=57)
2139 Score ∼100%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1146 Points ∼100%
BQ Aquaris X2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1059 Points ∼92% -8%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
815 Points ∼71% -29%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1077 Points ∼94% -6%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
1051 Points ∼92% -8%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
927 Points ∼81% -19%
Wiko View 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 4096
743 Points ∼65% -35%
Average Mediatek Helio P60
  (1083 - 1161, n=4)
1130 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1731, n=621)
751 Points ∼66% -34%
Graphics (sort by value)
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1590 Points ∼52%
BQ Aquaris X2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1597 Points ∼52% 0%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1409 Points ∼46% -11%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
3086 Points ∼100% +94%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
1465 Points ∼47% -8%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1957 Points ∼63% +23%
Wiko View 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 4096
975 Points ∼32% -39%
Average Mediatek Helio P60
  (1262 - 1590, n=4)
1468 Points ∼48% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 15969, n=621)
1986 Points ∼64% +25%
Memory (sort by value)
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1958 Points ∼66%
BQ Aquaris X2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2016 Points ∼68% +3%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
983 Points ∼33% -50%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2947 Points ∼100% +51%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
2823 Points ∼96% +44%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2492 Points ∼85% +27%
Wiko View 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 4096
861 Points ∼29% -56%
Average Mediatek Helio P60
  (1958 - 2721, n=4)
2276 Points ∼77% +16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 7500, n=621)
1487 Points ∼50% -24%
System (sort by value)
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
3915 Points ∼69%
BQ Aquaris X2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
4434 Points ∼78% +13%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
3159 Points ∼56% -19%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
5681 Points ∼100% +45%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
4826 Points ∼85% +23%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
5112 Points ∼90% +31%
Wiko View 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 4096
2894 Points ∼51% -26%
Average Mediatek Helio P60
  (3817 - 4736, n=4)
4114 Points ∼72% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 12202, n=621)
2910 Points ∼51% -26%
Overall (sort by value)
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1933 Points ∼71%
BQ Aquaris X2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1972 Points ∼72% +2%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1374 Points ∼50% -29%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2731 Points ∼100% +41%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
2140 Points ∼78% +11%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2193 Points ∼80% +13%
Wiko View 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 4096
1159 Points ∼42% -40%
Average Mediatek Helio P60
  (1830 - 2096, n=4)
1980 Points ∼73% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6097, n=621)
1460 Points ∼53% -24%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
260 Points ∼36%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
482 Points ∼66%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
504 Points ∼69%
Average Mediatek Helio P60
  (322 - 413, n=2)
368 Points ∼50%
Average of class Smartphone
  (35 - 2754, n=102)
730 Points ∼100%

In the browser benchmarks, the Wiko View 3 Pro is able to ensure itself a solid place in the midfield of our chosen comparison devices. In everyday usage, websites are presented quickly, and media content is loaded with ease.

WebXPRT 3 - ---
Nokia 8.1 (Chrome 71)
72 Points ∼100% +36%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 161, n=150)
64.2 Points ∼89% +21%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019 (Chrome 74)
63 Points ∼88% +19%
Samsung Galaxy A50 (Chrome 73)
62 Points ∼86% +17%
BQ Aquaris X2 (Chrome 67)
54 Points ∼75% +2%
Wiko View 3 Pro (Chrome 74)
53 Points ∼74%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (49 - 54, n=3)
52 Points ∼72% -2%
Sony Xperia 10 (Chrome Version 73)
39 Points ∼54% -26%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Nokia 8.1 (Chrome 71)
12717 Points ∼100% +45%
Samsung Galaxy A50 (Chrome 73)
10322 Points ∼81% +18%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019 (Chrome 74)
9695 Points ∼76% +10%
BQ Aquaris X2 (Chrome 67)
9004 Points ∼71% +3%
Wiko View 3 Pro (Chrome 74)
8778 Points ∼69%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (8287 - 9059, n=5)
8699 Points ∼68% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 43280, n=677)
6450 Points ∼51% -27%
Sony Xperia 10 (Chrome Version 73)
4865 Points ∼38% -45%
Wiko View 2 Pro (Chrome 67)
4001 Points ∼31% -54%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Wiko View 2 Pro (Chrome 67)
11455.8 ms * ∼100% -158%
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=702)
10678 ms * ∼93% -140%
Sony Xperia 10 (Chrome Version 73)
10256.9 ms * ∼90% -131%
BQ Aquaris X2
4733 ms * ∼41% -6%
Wiko View 3 Pro (Chrome 74)
4447.6 ms * ∼39%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (4309 - 4611, n=5)
4428 ms * ∼39% -0%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019 (Chrome 74)
4250.7 ms * ∼37% +4%
Samsung Galaxy A50 (Chrome 73)
3897 ms * ∼34% +12%
Nokia 8.1 (Chrome 71)
3034.9 ms * ∼26% +32%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Nokia 8.1 (Chrome 71)
66.048 Points ∼100% +37%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019 (Chrome 74)
51.398 Points ∼78% +7%
Wiko View 3 Pro (Chrome 74)
48.107 Points ∼73%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (41.7 - 48.9, n=5)
45.9 Points ∼69% -5%
BQ Aquaris X2 (Chrome 67)
44.245 Points ∼67% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 273, n=518)
39.6 Points ∼60% -18%
Wiko View 2 Pro (Chrome 67)
22.257 Points ∼34% -54%

* ... smaller is better

The internal storage in the View 3 Pro reached good read speeds on our storage benchmarks, but it showed weaknesses in writing speeds. However, in comparison to other smartphones of its class, the values reached are above average and enough to gain second place in our test field.

According to the manufacturer the internal storage can be expanded by up to 512 GB through a microSD card. The internal card reader reached good read and write speeds with our Toshiba Exceria M501 reference memory card, which are on par with the competing devices in our test field.

Wiko View 3 ProBQ Aquaris X2Sony Xperia 10Nokia 8.1Huawei P Smart Plus 2019Samsung Galaxy A50Wiko View 2 ProAverage 128 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-16%
-9%
-14%
15%
7%
-17%
-1%
-28%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
60.51 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
62.28 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
3%
63.81 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
5%
58.27 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-4%
66.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
10%
60.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
57.83 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-4%
65.9 (58.8 - 73.5, n=13)
9%
49 (3.4 - 87.1, n=410)
-19%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
77.38 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
82.91 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
7%
83.23 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
8%
84.65 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
9%
76.3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-1%
73.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-4%
82.29 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
6%
77.6 (72.3 - 85.9, n=13)
0%
67.2 (8.1 - 96.5, n=410)
-13%
Random Write 4KB
31.2
14.4
-54%
14.39
-54%
7.3
-77%
77.3
148%
18.2
-42%
6.72
-78%
35.4 (8.48 - 127, n=15)
13%
21.3 (0.14 - 250, n=730)
-32%
Random Read 4KB
89.67
43.9
-51%
53.12
-41%
69.9
-22%
40.3
-55%
98.9
10%
65.63
-27%
68.5 (20.7 - 108, n=15)
-24%
46.1 (1.59 - 196, n=730)
-49%
Sequential Write 256KB
171.57
188.7
10%
232.87
36%
203.8
19%
152.8
-11%
192.1
12%
194.28
13%
172 (90 - 201, n=15)
0%
94.6 (2.99 - 590, n=730)
-45%
Sequential Read 256KB
302.74
270.5
-11%
273.8
-10%
279.3
-8%
295.4
-2%
507.3
68%
265.37
-12%
286 (144 - 499, n=15)
-6%
266 (12.1 - 1504, n=730)
-12%

Games - Wiko smartphone suitable for gaming

The ARM Mali-G72 MP3 internal graphics unit is a mid-range GPU, which is suitable for devices with moderate demand for graphics performance. Therefore, modern games can be played smoothly at medium quality levels, whereby a bit of choppiness can be noticed with particularly demanding titles. The games tested by us, Arena of Valor and PUBG Mobile ran without issues all the time, and were able to be controlled reliably through the touchscreen. The smooth display surface made it possible to go through long gaming sessions without the fingertips becoming strained. The position sensor reacted reliably in games that required it for their control, and it transferred the movements of the smartphone directly to the system.

Since smartphones with a similar configuration only reached frame rates of 25 fps in our PUBG Mobile tests, we cannot rule out the possibility of users of the Wiko View 3 Pro also facing small frame drops during long gaming sessions.

Arena of Valor
Arena of Valor
PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile

Emissions - View 3 Pro gets slightly warm

Temperature

According to our measurements, the View 3 Pro exhibited maximum surface temperatures of 33.6 °C (~92 °F) in idle usage and 36.4 °C (~98 °F) under load. With this, the smartphone feels warm particularly in the top, which is also perceived by the hands when playing in landscape mode. But the device never becomes so hot that it cannot be held in the hand. We were unable to detect restrictions resulting from the temperature on the inside of the device being too high in our review.

Max. Load
 35.6 °C
96 F
35.5 °C
96 F
35 °C
95 F
 
 36.2 °C
97 F
35.1 °C
95 F
34.5 °C
94 F
 
 32.1 °C
90 F
35 °C
95 F
34.1 °C
93 F
 
Maximum: 36.2 °C = 97 F
Average: 34.8 °C = 95 F
31.9 °C
89 F
32.6 °C
91 F
35.9 °C
97 F
32.2 °C
90 F
33.2 °C
92 F
36.4 °C
98 F
30.9 °C
88 F
32.6 °C
91 F
36 °C
97 F
Maximum: 36.4 °C = 98 F
Average: 33.5 °C = 92 F
Power Supply (max.)  27 °C = 81 F | Room Temperature 21.3 °C = 70 F | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.8 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.2 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 35.5 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.4 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.1 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
Heat development - Top
Heat development - Top
Heat development - Bottom
Heat development - Bottom

Speaker

Speaker
Speaker

The speaker in the Wiko smartphone provides relatively high volume with a sound spectrum characterized by low highs. However, sounds below the high mids decline quite quickly, making the View 3 Pro only partially suitable for playing media content. External speakers or headphones are recommended in the long run, which can be connected to the smartphone through the 3.5 mm audio jack, among other ways. This connector holds corresponding plugs firmly in place, and does not have a negative impact on sound quality. The included stereo headset is rather suitable for voice reproduction and is only adequate for music playback when no other alternatives are available.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.137.92527.427.53125.5224024.5245036.138.86326.125.28024.321.610022.124.412519.12516020.241.520019.445.925016.555.331515.160.440015.363.95001466.563014.567.78001471.8100014.576.4125014.577160014.377.8200014.678.325001479.1315014.779.6400014.379.7500014.875.8630014.675.5800014.474.21000014.671.41250014.763.6160001544.4SPL26.788.9N0.875.4median 14.6median 71.4Delta1.512.442.246.742.143.934.636.737.342.739.84532.736.427.729.327.83125.734.323.340.22344.221.449.221.455.720.161.620.563.421.869.520.472.12074.618.273.918.972.9187419.174.518.276.71871.21968.21872.418.17518.166.418.252.318.148.365.965.66267.731.38518.518.514.623.11.662.7median 19.1median 68.21.811.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseWiko View 3 ProSamsung Galaxy A50
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Wiko View 3 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 54% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Samsung Galaxy A50 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 37% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 61% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Battery life - Large smartphone with long battery life

Energy consumption

Our measurements show that the Wiko View 3 Pro has an energy requirement of at least 0.77 watts in idle usage and of 5.53 watts maximum under load. This makes the energy consumption significantly lower than the one observed in most devices in our test field. Only the Nokia 8.1 and the Wiko View 2 Pro predecessor exhibit a similarly low requirement.

The provided charger offers an output of 18 watts and has therefore sufficient capacity to be able to supply the Wiko View 3 Pro with enough energy.

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.02 / 0.27 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.77 / 1.79 / 1.86 Watt
Load midlight 2.74 / 5.53 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Wiko View 3 Pro
4000 mAh
BQ Aquaris X2
3100 mAh
Sony Xperia 10
2870 mAh
Nokia 8.1
3500 mAh
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
3400 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A50
4000 mAh
Wiko View 2 Pro
3000 mAh
Average Mediatek Helio P60
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-19%
-10%
0%
-18%
-29%
1%
Idle Minimum *
0.77
0.65
16%
0.72
6%
0.8
-4%
0.8
-4%
0.8
-4%
0.64
17%
Idle Average *
1.79
2.24
-25%
2.16
-21%
1.5
16%
1.2
33%
1.5
16%
2.07
-16%
Idle Maximum *
1.86
2.26
-22%
2.17
-17%
1.8
3%
2.3
-24%
1.7
9%
2.13
-15%
Load Average *
2.74
3.87
-41%
3.32
-21%
3.2
-17%
4.5
-64%
5.9
-115%
2.69
2%
Load Maximum *
5.53
6.8
-23%
5.34
3%
5.4
2%
7.3
-32%
8.3
-50%
4.46
19%

* ... smaller is better

Battery life

In our practical Wi-Fi test, the Wiko View 3 Pro reached a runtime of 14 hours and 46 minutes. The large Android smartphone can earn a spot above the rest of the devices in our test field, whereby the View 3 Pro also sports the largest battery among our chosen comparison devices.

The included charger supports the Pump Express fast charging technology and requires around two hours to fully charge the 4000-mAh battery.

Battery Runtime
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
14h 46min
Wiko View 3 Pro
4000 mAh
BQ Aquaris X2
3100 mAh
Sony Xperia 10
2870 mAh
Nokia 8.1
3500 mAh
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
3400 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A50
4000 mAh
Wiko View 2 Pro
3000 mAh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3
886
617
-30%
541
-39%
738
-17%
523
-41%
701
-21%
857
-3%

Pros

+ attractive design
+ large display
+ long battery life
+ good system performance

Cons

- moderate camera performance for triple-camera setup
- no dual-SIM when a microSD card is used
- display is comparatively very reflective

Verdict - Wiko View 3 Pro convinces with performance, but camera shows weaknesses

In review: Wiko View 3 Pro. Review device provided by: Wiko Germany.
In review: Wiko View 3 Pro. Review device provided by: Wiko Germany.

The Wiko View 3 Pro scores points in our review with its design, which is embossed with an attractive color gradient. The 6.3-inch Android smartphone does not show any shortcomings in its build quality, and it continues to show its qualities with the system performance too. The mid-range performance is refined by an upscale storage configuration, which results in a smooth operating system.

Not only does the Wiko View 3 Pro shine with its large display but also with its large storage configuration. However, the camera is not able to fully meet our expectations.

The greatly advertised triple-camera setup does not manage to completely meet our expectations. While close-ups look pleasing under good lighting conditions, subjects become dark under poor lighting conditions, and brighter areas are overexposed. Buyers that can deal with this shortcoming will be thrilled with the long battery life, and will find joy in the device's design and the large display.

Wiko View 3 Pro - 06/03/2019 v6(old)
Mike Wobker

Chassis
85%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
90%
Connectivity
45 / 60 → 75%
Weight
89%
Battery
98%
Display
81%
Games Performance
50 / 63 → 79%
Application Performance
66 / 70 → 95%
Temperature
91%
Noise
100%
Audio
69 / 91 → 76%
Camera
54%
Average
76%
84%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Reviews > Wiko View 3 Pro Smartphone Review
Mike Wobker, 2019-06- 5 (Update: 2019-06- 8)