Wiko View 3 Pro
Specifications

Secondary Camera: 16 MPix f/2.0
Pricecompare
Average of 14 scores (from 24 reviews)
Reviews for the Wiko View 3 Pro
Wiko is trying to significantly lower the price limit for smartphones with a triple-camera setup. At the same time, it is relying on many AI functions, a large amount of storage and an attractive design. In our review we will reveal what else the Wiko View 3 Pro offers for around 300 Euros (~$338).
Source: DxOMark

The Wiko View 3 Pro offers an impressive-looking spec sheet at a budget price point, but unfortunately, at least for the camera, this does not translate into an impressive performance, thus the View 3 Pro achieves one of the lowest camera scores among all the devices we have tested so far. It’s capable of recording acceptable photos and videos in ideal conditions, but in more challenging situations the camera struggles. Overall, there is quite a bit of room for improvement in all areas, making the Wiko hard to recommend to anyone who values camera performance on their smartphone—and that’s true even considering the attractive price point.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/31/2019
Foreign Reviews
Source: Chip.de

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/09/2019
Rating: Total score: 79% performance: 82% features: 74% display: 80% mobility: 92%
Source: Connect - 8/19

Single Review, , Medium, Date: 07/01/2019
Rating: Total score: 77% features: 70% mobility: 98% ergonomy: 69%
Source: Android Pit

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/02/2019
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Tech Stage

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/06/2019
Source: Teltarif

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/05/2019
Rating: Total score: 90% display: 70% mobility: 90% workmanship: 90%
Source: WinFuture

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/28/2019
Source: Inside Handy

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/27/2019
Source: Curved

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/26/2019
Source: MuyComputer

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/03/2019
Rating: Total score: 81% performance: 85% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 75%
Source: Computerhoy

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/06/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% features: 80% display: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Andro 4 All

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/22/2019
Rating: Total score: 71%
Source: Zona Movilidad

Positive: Attractive design; powerful hardware; high performance; good price.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 10/11/2019
Source: El Androide Libre

Positive: Decent hardware; nice design; great built quality.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/22/2019
Source: PC Guia

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/11/2019
Rating: Total score: 71% price: 80%
Source: Android Geek

Positive: Great autonomy; nice design; high performance. Negative: Poor cameras; high price; bulky.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/07/2019
Source: AndroidWorld.it

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/19/2019
Rating: Total score: 74% price: 75% features: 75% display: 80% mobility: 75% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: HDblog.it

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/01/2019
Rating: price: 59% features: 79%
Source: AndroidPit.it

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/26/2019
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: CNet France

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/19/2019
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Frandroid

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/29/2019
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: AndroidPit.fr

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/30/2019
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Top for Phone

Positive: Beautiful design; nice cameras; long battery life.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/10/2019
Source: Phonandroid

Positive: Good price; nice design; great display; long battery life.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/26/2019
Comment
ARM Mali-G72 MP3: Integrated graphics card from ARM with 3 cores based on the 2nd generation of the Bifrost architecture.
Non demanding games should be playable with these graphics cards.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
Helio P60: ARM based octa-core SoC with 4x big ARM Cortex-A73 cores and 4x small and power efficient ARM Cortex-A53 cores. All clocked up to 2 GHz. Integrates a Cat-7 (DL) / Cat-13 (UL) LTE Modem (4G), ARM Mali-G72 MP3 GPU and a dedicated AI processing unit.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
6.30":
Only a few smartphones have larger screens.
Large display-sizes allow higher resolutions. So, details like letters are bigger. On the other hand, the power consumption is lower with small screen diagonals and the devices are smaller, more lightweight and cheaper.
0.184 kg:
Only few smartphones are more lightweight than this.
Wiko:
Wiko SAS was founded as a French smartphone manufacturer in 2011. Since 2014, the Chinese technology group Tinno Mobile has owned a majority of Wiko. They produce in China. The company has already reached a considerable market share in the French market in early years and expanded to Europe and Africa later on. Nevertheless, the world market share is low.
Reviews are only available since 2014, that is since the first international expansion. Recently, the number of reviews has increased. The ratings are average (as of 2016).
72.66%: This rating is bad. Most notebooks are better rated. This is not a recommendation for purchase.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.