Wiko View 3 Pro
Specifications

Secondary Camera: 16 MPix f/2.0
Price comparison
Average of 14 scores (from 24 reviews)
Reviews for the Wiko View 3 Pro
Wiko is trying to significantly lower the price limit for smartphones with a triple-camera setup. At the same time, it is relying on many AI functions, a large amount of storage and an attractive design. In our review we will reveal what else the Wiko View 3 Pro offers for around 300 Euros (~$338).
Source: DxOMark
Archive.org versionThe Wiko View 3 Pro offers an impressive-looking spec sheet at a budget price point, but unfortunately, at least for the camera, this does not translate into an impressive performance, thus the View 3 Pro achieves one of the lowest camera scores among all the devices we have tested so far. It’s capable of recording acceptable photos and videos in ideal conditions, but in more challenging situations the camera struggles. Overall, there is quite a bit of room for improvement in all areas, making the Wiko hard to recommend to anyone who values camera performance on their smartphone—and that’s true even considering the attractive price point.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/31/2019
Foreign Reviews
Source: Chip.de
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/09/2019
Rating: Total score: 79% performance: 82% features: 74% display: 80% mobility: 92%
Source: Connect - 8/19

Single Review, , Medium, Date: 07/01/2019
Rating: Total score: 77% features: 70% mobility: 98% ergonomy: 69%
Source: Android Pit
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/02/2019
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Tech Stage
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/06/2019
Source: Teltarif
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/05/2019
Rating: Total score: 90% display: 70% mobility: 90% workmanship: 90%
Source: WinFuture
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/28/2019
Source: Inside Handy
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/27/2019
Source: Curved
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/26/2019
Source: MuyComputer
ES→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/03/2019
Rating: Total score: 81% performance: 85% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 75%
Source: Computerhoy
ES→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/06/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% features: 80% display: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Andro 4 All
ES→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/22/2019
Rating: Total score: 71%
Source: Zona Movilidad
ES→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Attractive design; powerful hardware; high performance; good price.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 10/11/2019
Source: El Androide Libre
ES→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Decent hardware; nice design; great built quality.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/22/2019
Source: PC Guia
PT→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/11/2019
Rating: Total score: 71% price: 80%
Source: Android Geek
PT→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Great autonomy; nice design; high performance. Negative: Poor cameras; high price; bulky.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/07/2019
Source: AndroidWorld.it
IT→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/19/2019
Rating: Total score: 74% price: 75% features: 75% display: 80% mobility: 75% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: HDblog.it
IT→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/01/2019
Rating: price: 59% features: 79%
Source: AndroidPit.it
IT→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/26/2019
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: CNet France
FR→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/19/2019
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Frandroid
FR→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/29/2019
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: AndroidPit.fr
FR→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/30/2019
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Top for Phone
FR→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Beautiful design; nice cameras; long battery life.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/10/2019
Source: Phonandroid
FR→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Good price; nice design; great display; long battery life.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/26/2019
Comment
ARM Mali-G72 MP3: Integrated graphics card from ARM with 3 cores based on the 2nd generation of the Bifrost architecture.
Non demanding games should be playable with these graphics cards.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
Helio P60: ARM based octa-core SoC with 4x big ARM Cortex-A73 cores and 4x small and power efficient ARM Cortex-A53 cores. All clocked up to 2 GHz. Integrates a Cat-7 (DL) / Cat-13 (UL) LTE Modem (4G), ARM Mali-G72 MP3 GPU and a dedicated AI processing unit.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.