Secondary Camera: 8 MPix
Average of 1 scores (from 2 reviews)
Reviews for the Doogee S86
Despite the problems in the software and the fact that the quad-cameras are really going to leave you using only one, the Doogee S86 impressed us. It’s not often that a phone with a battery that can last up to four days with regular usage crosses our desk. Let alone one that combines unheard-of battery life with some of the best-rugged abilities in a smartphone today. Plus, for less than $300, you really can’t expect this to blow you away in any other manner. If you need a smartphone to take with you to the job site while lasting at least a few days, the Doogee S86 at $270 is arguably the best option. There’s really not anything else to consider at this price point, and it will serve its purpose of being a more basic smartphone.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/23/2021
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→EN
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/29/2021
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 100% workmanship: 100%
ARM Mali-G72 MP3: Integrated graphics card from ARM with 3 cores based on the 2nd generation of the Bifrost architecture.
Non demanding games should be playable with these graphics cards.
Helio P60: ARM based octa-core SoC with 4x big ARM Cortex-A73 cores and 4x small and power efficient ARM Cortex-A53 cores. All clocked up to 2 GHz. Integrates a Cat-7 (DL) / Cat-13 (UL) LTE Modem (4G), ARM Mali-G72 MP3 GPU and a dedicated AI processing unit.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
Only a few smartphones have larger screens.
Large display-sizes allow higher resolutions. So, details like letters are bigger. On the other hand, the power consumption is lower with small screen diagonals and the devices are smaller, more lightweight and cheaper.
This weight is somewhat high for a smartphone. Smartphones with a big screen and small tablets weigh as much, usually.
Doogee Mobile Limited Company produces smarpthones under the Doogee brand. Their products have first been reviewed from 2015 and only sporadically. The ratings are below-average (as of 2016).
80%: This rating is not convincing. The laptop is evaluated below average, this is not really a recommendation for purchase.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.