Wiko View 2
Specifications

Secondary Camera: 16 MPix
Price comparison
Average of 15 scores (from 24 reviews)
Reviews for the Wiko View 2
Source: PCtipp.ch

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/27/2018
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Android Pit

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/06/2018
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Netzwelt

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/02/2018
Rating: Total score: 70% features: 80% mobility: 60% workmanship: 90%
Source: Geektopia

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/12/2018
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 70% display: 75% mobility: 95% workmanship: 75%
Source: Tuexperto

Positive: Impressive display; long battery life; nice selfie camera. Negative: Poor display.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/11/2018
Source: El chapuzas Informatico

Positive: Attractive design; great built quality; nice display; large screen; high performance; excellent cameras. Negative: Relatively high price; short battery life.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/25/2018
Source: El Androide Libre

Positive: Low price; nice display; good selfie camera.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/17/2018
Source: PC Guia

Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 11/24/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Pplware

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/20/2018
Rating: Total score: 78% performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: AndroidWorld.it

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/27/2018
Rating: Total score: 71% price: 75% features: 70% display: 75% mobility: 75% workmanship: 75% ergonomy: 75%
Source: Smartphone Italia

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/02/2018
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 70% features: 80% display: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: InstaNews

Positive: Modern design; good price. Negative: Poor display; mediocre speakers.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/20/2018
Source: Smartphone Italia

Positive: Attractive design; nice display; high performance.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 05/25/2018
Source: Tablets Magazine

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/18/2018
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: All About Phones

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/27/2018
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: All About Phones

Comparison, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/06/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: AndroidWorld.nl

Positive: Nice display; face ID; good cameras; long battery life. Negative: Weak processor.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/27/2018
Source: Consumentenbond

Positive: Good price; decent hardware; face ID. Negative: Poor cameras; poor display.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/14/2018
Source: CNet France

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/01/2018
Rating: Total score: 61%
Source: Les Mobiles

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/01/2018
Rating: Total score: 66%
Source: Phonandroid

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/14/2018
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Top for Phone

Positive: Low price; nice screen; fast system. Negative: Short battery life.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/19/2018
Source: AndroidPit.fr

Positive: Low price; attractive design; nice display; decent performance.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/28/2018
Source: Tabletowo

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/05/2018
Rating: Total score: 69% performance: 60% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 75%
Comment
Qualcomm Adreno 505: Mid range graphics card integrated in the Snapdragon 430 and 435 SoCs. Based on the 500 generation and supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0, OpenGL ES 3.1 + AE, OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 12.
Only some 3D games with very low demands are playable with these cards.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
435: Lower mainstream octa-core ARM Cortex-A53 SoC clocked at up to 1.4 GHz and the Adreno 505 GPU, a DDR3L-1600 memory controller as well as an X9 LTE (Cat. 7) modem. » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.