Secondary Camera: 13 MPix
Average of 3 scores (from 3 reviews)
Reviews for the Gigaset GS280
German manufacturer Gigaset aims primarily at video streamers with its latest GS280 smartphone and equips it with a large battery as well as a bright high-resolution display. In addition, it is also supposed to house a decent camera and offer adequate system performance. Find out in our test whether or not Gigaset succeeded with its ambitious goals.
Source: Android Mag DE→EN
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/14/2019
Rating: Total score: 62% performance: 60% display: 80% mobility: 78% workmanship: 80%
Source: WinFuture DE→EN
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/03/2019
Source: Tech.de DE→EN
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/17/2019
Rating: Total score: 84% performance: 81% display: 80% mobility: 95% workmanship: 80%
CommentQualcomm Adreno 505: Only some 3D games with very low demands are playable with these cards. » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
430: Lower mainstream octa-core ARM Cortex-A53 SoC clocked at up to 1.4 GHz and the Adreno 505 GPU, a DDR3L-1600 memory controller as well as an X6 LTE (Cat. 4) modem.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
This display is quite big for a smartphone but frequently used for smartphones.
Large display-sizes allow higher resolutions. So, details like letters are bigger. On the other hand, the power consumption is lower with small screen diagonals and the devices are smaller, more lightweight and cheaper.» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.
Only few smartphones are more lightweight than this.
Gigaset Communications GmbH is a manufacturer of DECT phones, tablets and smartphones, headquartered in Germany and originated from a subsidiary of Siemens, but has been part of Arques Industries since 2008.
The market shares in the smartphone range are just as low as the amount of test reports. The achieved ratings are average (as of 2016).
74.67%: This rating is bad. Most notebooks are better rated. This is not a recommendation for purchase.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.