Notebookcheck Logo

Wiko View 3 Lite


Wiko View 3 Lite
Wiko View 3 Lite (View Series)
Graphics adapter
2048 MB 
6.09 inch 18:9, 1520 x 720 pixel 276 PPI, Capacitive, IPS, 2.5D curved, glossy: yes
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
Audio Connections: 3.5mm, Card Reader: microSD (128GB), Sensors: Accelerometer, Magnetic sensor, Proximity sensor, Light sensor, microUSB
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.2, GSm, UMTS, LTE, Dual SIM, GPS
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.7 x 155.5 x 73 ( = 0.34 x 6.12 x 2.87 in)
4000 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Android 9.0 Pie
Primary Camera: 13 MPix Dual: 13MP + 2MP
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix Digital Zoom 4x
Additional features
Keyboard: Virtual
160 g ( = 5.64 oz / 0.35 pounds) ( = 0 oz / 0 pounds)
150 Euro



Average Score: 73% - average
Average of 3 scores (from 9 reviews)
price: 90%, performance: 60%, features: - %, display: 78% mobility: 80%, workmanship: 80%, ergonomy: - %, emissions: - %

Reviews for the Wiko View 3 Lite

81% Handy-Test: Wiko View 3 Lite für unter 130 Euro
Source: Teltarif German DE→EN version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/27/2019
Rating: Total score: 81% price: 100% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 90%
72% Análisis: View3 Lite de Wiko
Source: Geektopia Spanish ES→EN version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/21/2019
Rating: Total score: 72% performance: 60% display: 75% mobility: 90% workmanship: 70%
66% Wiko View3 Lite
Source: PC Guia Portuegese PT→EN version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 09/22/2019
Rating: Total score: 66% price: 80%
Wiko View 3 Lite, que de "Lite" não aparenta nada
Source: Android Geek Portuegese PT→EN version
Positive: High autonomy; great built quality; attractive price. Negative: Average performance; weak hardware.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/09/2019
Wiko View 3 Lite: come va e le differenze con il resto della serie
Source: Italian IT→EN version
Positive: Beautiful design; great built quality; long battery life; good price.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/09/2019
Test du Wiko View 3 Lite : le plus accessible des View 3
Source: Top for Phone French FR→EN version
Positive: Decent hardware; nice cameras. Negative: Average performance.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/02/2019
Đánh giá nhanh Wiko View 3 Lite: Giá mềm, pin “trâu”
Source: Danviet VN→EN version
Positive: Low price; long battery life; premium design; solid workmanship.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/05/2019
Wiko View3 Lite - đối thủ nặng ký trong tầm giá 2 triệu đồng
Source: Zing VN→EN version
Positive: Low price; premium design; great built quality; nice performance.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/04/2019
Có nên mua Wiko View 3 Lite không?
Source: Viettelstore VN→EN version
Positive: Frameless design; high performance; nice dual cameras; low price.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 05/29/2019



These graphics cards are not suited for Windows 3D games. Office and Internet surfing however is possible.

» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.

unknown: » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.


It is a small display format for smartphones. You shouldn't be severely defective in vision, and you won't see much detail on the screen and only have a small resolution available. For that, the device should be small and handy, easy to transport.

» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.


Wiko SAS was founded as a French smartphone manufacturer in 2011. Since 2014, the Chinese technology group Tinno Mobile has owned a majority of Wiko. They produce in China. The company has already reached a considerable market share in the French market in early years and expanded to Europe and Africa later on. Nevertheless, the world market share is low.

Reviews are only available since 2014, that is since the first international expansion. Recently, the number of reviews has increased. The ratings are average (as of 2016).

73%: This rating is poor. More than three quarters of the models are rated better. That is rather not a purchase recommendation. Even if verbal ratings in this area do not sound that bad ("sufficient" or "satisfactory"), they are usually euphemisms that disguise a classification as a below-average laptop.

» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.


Please share our article, every link counts!

Devices from a different Manufacturer and/or with a different CPU

Blu G52L
unknown, unknown
Huawei Enjoy 50Z
unknown, unknown
Crosscall Core-Z5
unknown, unknown
Huawei Nova Y61
unknown, unknown
Xiaomi Civi 2
unknown, unknown
Vivo iQOO Z6 Lite 5G
unknown, unknown
AGM H5 Pro
unknown, unknown
Blu G61s
unknown, unknown
Blu G50 Mega 2022
unknown, unknown
Blu G71 Plus
unknown, unknown
Blu C5 Max
unknown, unknown
Blu C5L Max
unknown, unknown
Vivo S15e
unknown, unknown
Nokia C2 2nd Edition
unknown, unknown
BQ RU BQ 5765L Clever
unknown, unknown
Blu G51S
unknown, unknown
Oukitel C25
unknown, unknown
Ulefone Note 6
unknown, unknown
Oukitel K15 Plus
unknown, unknown
realme Q3 Pro
unknown, unknown
Vivo Y51s
unknown, unknown
Huawei Nova 8 SE
unknown, unknown
Huawei Mate 40
unknown, unknown
realme X7
unknown, unknown
realme Narzo 20 Pro
unknown, unknown
realme X7 Pro
unknown, unknown
realme V3
unknown, unknown
Honor 30 Lite (30 Youth)
unknown, unknown
Huawei Enjoy 20 Pro
unknown, unknown
Current Prices
Stefan Hinum (Update: 2019-06-23)