Crosscall Core-Z5
Specifications
Crosscall Core-Z5 (Core Series)
Processor
unknown
Graphics adapter
unknown
Memory
4 GB
Display
6.08 inch 19:9, 1520 x 720 pixel 277 PPI, Capacitive, IPS, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, glossy: yes
Storage
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB
Connections
USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5mm, Card Reader: microSD, Sensors: Accelerometer, Proximity, Light sensor, Gyro, E-Compass
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.2, GSM, UMTS, LTE, 5G, Dual SIM, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 14 x 175 x 81 ( = 0.55 x 6.89 x 3.19 in)
Battery
4950 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Android 12
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix
Additional features
Keyboard: OnScreen
Weight
281 g ( = 9.91 oz / 0.62 pounds) ( = 0 oz / 0 pounds)
Links
Price comparison
Average Score:
Average of 2 scores (from 3 reviews)
Average of 2 scores (from 3 reviews)
price: - %, performance: 90%, features: - %, display: 40% mobility: 85%, workmanship: 80%, ergonomy: 80%, emissions: - %
Reviews for the Crosscall Core-Z5
Crosscall Core-Z5 Camera test
Source: DxOMark
The Crosscall Core-Z5 smartphone from the French maker of durable phones is primarily intended for users who need devices that are resistant to shocks and drops and that can perform in extreme conditions.The Core-Z5 is also the brand’s first 5G phone, and it finds itself in our premium price segment ($600 to $799). When it comes to image quality from the single rear camera, however, the Core-Z5 still has far to go before it can compete with other phones in this segment. The camera, in general, is capable of capturing basic correct images in standard outdoor conditions, where the device is most likely to be used. In our testing, the Core-X5’s photos and videos turned out better than those taken with the Action-X5, a Crosscall model we evaluated previously, but the Core-Z5’s image quality was severely limited because of the lack of an ultra-wide camera module, which affected the device’s zoom and overall score. The lack of a tele module on the Core-Z5, a feature that is commonly found on devices in this price range, also hindered the device’s camera performance.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 12/23/2022
Source: DxOMark
The Crosscall Core-Z5 smartphone from the French maker of durable phones is primarily intended for users who need devices that are resistant to shocks and drops and that can perform in extreme conditions.The Core-Z5 is also the brand’s first 5G phone, and it finds itself in our premium price segment ($600 to $799). When it comes to image quality from the single rear camera, however, the Core-Z5 still has far to go before it can compete with other phones in this segment. The camera, in general, is capable of capturing basic correct images in standard outdoor conditions, where the device is most likely to be used. In our testing, the Core-X5’s photos and videos turned out better than those taken with the Action-X5, a Crosscall model we evaluated previously, but the Core-Z5’s image quality was severely limited because of the lack of an ultra-wide camera module, which affected the device’s zoom and overall score. The lack of a tele module on the Core-Z5, a feature that is commonly found on devices in this price range, also hindered the device’s camera performance.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 12/23/2022
Foreign Reviews
Test Labo du Crosscall Core-Z5 : un smartphone increvable qui a de la ressource
Source: L' Eclaireur FNAC
FR→EN
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/25/2023
Rating: Total score: 60% performance: 100% display: 20% mobility: 90%
Source: L' Eclaireur FNAC
FR→ENSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/25/2023
Rating: Total score: 60% performance: 100% display: 20% mobility: 90%
Crosscall Core-Z5
Source: Les Numeriques FR→EN
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/18/2022
Rating: Total score: 60% performance: 80% display: 60% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Les Numeriques
FR→ENSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/18/2022
Rating: Total score: 60% performance: 80% display: 60% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Comment
unknown:
These graphics cards are not suited for Windows 3D games. Office and Internet surfing however is possible.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
unknown: » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
