Wiko View XL

Specifications

Pricecompare

Reviews for the Wiko View XL

75% Wiko View XL
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/08/2018
Rating: Total score: 75% performance: 60% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%

Wiko View, View XL et View Prime : notre prise en main en direct de l’IFA [Vidéo]
Source: Phonandroid FR→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Elegant design; good price; nice display.
Comparison, online available, Short, Date: 09/04/2017

Prise En Main Des Wiko View, View Xl Et View Prime : Des Smartphones Borderless À Prix Cassé
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Attractive design; compact size; solid workmanship.
Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 09/01/2017

Comment

Qualcomm Adreno 308: Integrated mid-range graphics card in the Snapdragon 425 SoCs that supports OpenGL ES 3.0 and features unified shaders.

These graphics cards are not suited for Windows 3D games. Office and Internet surfing however is possible.

» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.

425: Entry-level SoC that was announced in February 2016. It integrates 4 ARM Cortex-A53 CPU cores clocked at up to 1.4 GHz, an LPDDR3 memory controller and wireless radios for WiFi and 4G/LTE.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.

5.99":

It is a very small display format for smartphones. You should by no means be mis-sighted and you will generally see very little on the screen and only have a small resolution available. In return, the device should be very small and handy.

Wiko:

Wiko SAS was founded as a French smartphone manufacturer in 2011. Since 2014, the Chinese technology group Tinno Mobile has owned a majority of Wiko. They produce in China. The company has already reached a considerable market share in the French market in early years and expanded to Europe and Africa later on. Nevertheless, the world market share is low.

Reviews are only available since 2014, that is since the first international expansion. Recently, the number of reviews has increased. The ratings are average (as of 2016).

75%: This rating is poor. More than three quarters of the models are rated better. That is rather not a purchase recommendation. Even if verbal ratings in this area do not sound that bad ("sufficient" or "satisfactory"), they are usually euphemisms that disguise a classification as a below-average laptop.

» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.

Similar devices with the Same Specs

Similar devices from a different Manufacturer

Devices from a different Manufacturer and/or with a different CPU

Devices with the same GPU