Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A
Specifications
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix
Pricecompare
Average of 7 scores (from 26 reviews)
Reviews for the Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A
Source: Tech Advisor Archive.org version
The 2GB RAM model we reviewed lacks features compared to the better-specced Redmi Note 5A options that cost only slightly more. There's no fingerprint scanner, a slower processor, a less impressive selfie camera and less memory and storage.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/30/2018
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: GSM Arena Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A stays true to traditions with a bargain price and a reasonable level of equipment. Just don't be misled that the 'Note' moniker means the same it meant for the Redmi Note 4. This one is positioned lower in the foodchain. If you are alright with that, it won't disappoint a Redmi fan. And if you're keen on selfies it's quite a tempting offer.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/05/2018
Rating: Total score: 62%
Source: Phone World Archive.org version
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A is a mid-range device with average features in very reasonable price range. It has given us a very good camera results and performance in every section but it should have at least 3GB RAM. Rest of the features are good in this price. If you are looking for 4G device with good price and features, go for Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/27/2017
Source: Yugatech Archive.org version
The popularity of Xiaomi’s Redmi phones, which can easily be seen online, does not come without good reason. The Redmi Note 5A is surely no exception. While it has a downgraded chipset compared to its predecessors, it is still a very capable phone in terms of performance. Its overall camera performance is very good, and its great design and UI make it a device that’s great to have.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/03/2017
Source: Igeekphone Archive.org version
Redmi Note 5A advanced version is a good smartphone to enjoy some advantages like battery, camera, design, if you want a budget affordable phone with good front camera, Redmi note 5A will be the first choice. Right now Redmi Note 5A 2GB 16GB is in flash sale at $119.99, 3GB 32GB at $159.99, valid for 50 units. 4GB 64GB version will update later. Just hurry up.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/30/2017
Source: Igeekphone Archive.org version
In all, Redmi Note 5A has no much highlights, but it can win over most other brands in specs and price. So if you think well, just have a try.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/22/2017
Foreign Reviews
Source: Hartware DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/25/2017
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/20/2017
Rating: Total score: 67% performance: 50% display: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: FAQsAndroid ES→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Low price; metal case; long battery life. Negative: No USB-C.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/17/2018
Source: Movil Zona ES→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Decent display; good hardware; nice cameras; high autonomy; decent connectivity; good price.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/04/2017
Source: Techzilla.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/02/2017
Rating: Total score: 64% display: 60% mobility: 70% workmanship: 60%
Source: Chimera Revo IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/21/2017
Rating: Total score: 76% price: 80% features: 72% display: 70% mobility: 90% workmanship: 75% ergonomy: 75%
Source: Tutto App Android IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; nice performance; decent hardware.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/05/2018
Source: Cinafoniaci IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Decent cameras; good price. Negative: Mediocre design.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/19/2017
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; nice design; decent cameras; solid workmanship.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/12/2017
Source: Frandroid FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/08/2017
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 60% display: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: Top for Phone FR→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Solid workmanship; high autonomy. Negative: No fingerprint sensor; no backlit keys.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/10/2017
Source: Antyweb PL→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; decent performance; both dual sim and microSD slot; nice display. Negative: No fingerprint sensor.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/06/2018
Source: Helpix RU→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/05/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Product Test RU→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/25/2017
Rating: performance: 60% display: 78% mobility: 76%
Source: Yamobi RU→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Solid workmanship; nice screen; long battery life; support LTE; both dual Sim and memory card slot. Negative: Heavy and bulky; poor cameras.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/07/2018
Source: CZC CZ→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Low price; nice display; solid workmanship; support both dual sim and memory card slots; decent stamina; good cameras. Negative: Relatively bulky.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/10/2017
Source: The Gioididong VN→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Low price; nice gaming performance; long battery life; decent cameras. Negative: Poor display.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/28/2017
Source: The Gioididong VN→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Large screen; decent hardware; low price.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/26/2017
Source: Zing VN→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; large screen; support dual sim; microSD card slot; good hardware; metal case; fast fingerprint sensor.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/29/2017
Source: Jagat Review ID→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Nice design; good ergonomy; compact size; support both dual sim and microSD card slot; long battery life. Negative: Slow charging; poor cameras; low performance; no NFC; no fingerprint sensor.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/30/2017
Comment
Qualcomm Adreno 308: Integrated mid-range graphics card in the Snapdragon 425 SoCs that supports OpenGL ES 3.0 and features unified shaders.
These graphics cards are not suited for Windows 3D games. Office and Internet surfing however is possible.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
425: Entry-level SoC that was announced in February 2016. It integrates 4 ARM Cortex-A53 CPU cores clocked at up to 1.4 GHz, an LPDDR3 memory controller and wireless radios for WiFi and 4G/LTE.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
5.50":
It is a very small display format for smartphones. You should by no means be mis-sighted and you will generally see very little on the screen and only have a small resolution available. In return, the device should be very small and handy.
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.Xiaomi:
Founded in 2010, Xiaomi Corporation is a Chinese multinational electronics company and produces consumer electronics and related products, including smartphones, televisions, fitness bands, power banks, headphones, smart devices and accessories. Xiaomi offers its products under the Mi, Redmi and POCO brands.
69.86%: This rating is poor. More than three quarters of the models are rated better. That is rather not a purchase recommendation. Even if verbal ratings in this area do not sound that bad ("sufficient" or "satisfactory"), they are usually euphemisms that disguise a classification as a below-average laptop.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.