Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A
Specifications

Secondary Camera: 5 MPix
Price comparison
Average of 7 scores (from 26 reviews)
Reviews for the Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A
Source: Tech Advisor
Archive.org versionThe 2GB RAM model we reviewed lacks features compared to the better-specced Redmi Note 5A options that cost only slightly more. There's no fingerprint scanner, a slower processor, a less impressive selfie camera and less memory and storage.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/30/2018
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: GSM Arena
Archive.org versionThe Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A stays true to traditions with a bargain price and a reasonable level of equipment. Just don't be misled that the 'Note' moniker means the same it meant for the Redmi Note 4. This one is positioned lower in the foodchain. If you are alright with that, it won't disappoint a Redmi fan. And if you're keen on selfies it's quite a tempting offer.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/05/2018
Rating: Total score: 62%
Source: Phone World
Archive.org versionXiaomi Redmi Note 5A is a mid-range device with average features in very reasonable price range. It has given us a very good camera results and performance in every section but it should have at least 3GB RAM. Rest of the features are good in this price. If you are looking for 4G device with good price and features, go for Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/27/2017
Source: Yugatech
Archive.org versionThe popularity of Xiaomi’s Redmi phones, which can easily be seen online, does not come without good reason. The Redmi Note 5A is surely no exception. While it has a downgraded chipset compared to its predecessors, it is still a very capable phone in terms of performance. Its overall camera performance is very good, and its great design and UI make it a device that’s great to have.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/03/2017
Source: Igeekphone
Archive.org versionRedmi Note 5A advanced version is a good smartphone to enjoy some advantages like battery, camera, design, if you want a budget affordable phone with good front camera, Redmi note 5A will be the first choice. Right now Redmi Note 5A 2GB 16GB is in flash sale at $119.99, 3GB 32GB at $159.99, valid for 50 units. 4GB 64GB version will update later. Just hurry up.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/30/2017
Source: Igeekphone
Archive.org versionIn all, Redmi Note 5A has no much highlights, but it can win over most other brands in specs and price. So if you think well, just have a try.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/22/2017
Foreign Reviews
Source: Hartware
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/25/2017
Source: Chinahandys.net
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/20/2017
Rating: Total score: 67% performance: 50% display: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: FAQsAndroid
ES→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Low price; metal case; long battery life. Negative: No USB-C.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/17/2018
Source: Movil Zona
ES→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Decent display; good hardware; nice cameras; high autonomy; decent connectivity; good price.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/04/2017
Source: Techzilla.it
IT→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/02/2017
Rating: Total score: 64% display: 60% mobility: 70% workmanship: 60%
Source: Chimera Revo
IT→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/21/2017
Rating: Total score: 76% price: 80% features: 72% display: 70% mobility: 90% workmanship: 75% ergonomy: 75%
Source: Tutto App Android
IT→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Good price; nice performance; decent hardware.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/05/2018
Source: Cinafoniaci
IT→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Decent cameras; good price. Negative: Mediocre design.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/19/2017
Source: Pianeta Cellulare
IT→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Good price; nice design; decent cameras; solid workmanship.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/12/2017
Source: Frandroid
FR→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/08/2017
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 60% display: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: Top for Phone
FR→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Solid workmanship; high autonomy. Negative: No fingerprint sensor; no backlit keys.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/10/2017
Source: Antyweb
PL→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Good price; decent performance; both dual sim and microSD slot; nice display. Negative: No fingerprint sensor.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/06/2018
Source: Helpix
RU→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/05/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Product Test
RU→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/25/2017
Rating: performance: 60% display: 78% mobility: 76%
Source: Yamobi
RU→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Solid workmanship; nice screen; long battery life; support LTE; both dual Sim and memory card slot. Negative: Heavy and bulky; poor cameras.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/07/2018
Source: CZC
CZ→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Low price; nice display; solid workmanship; support both dual sim and memory card slots; decent stamina; good cameras. Negative: Relatively bulky.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/10/2017
Source: The Gioididong
VN→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Low price; nice gaming performance; long battery life; decent cameras. Negative: Poor display.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/28/2017
Source: The Gioididong
VN→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Large screen; decent hardware; low price.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/26/2017
Source: Zing
VN→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Good price; large screen; support dual sim; microSD card slot; good hardware; metal case; fast fingerprint sensor.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/29/2017
Source: Jagat Review
ID→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Nice design; good ergonomy; compact size; support both dual sim and microSD card slot; long battery life. Negative: Slow charging; poor cameras; low performance; no NFC; no fingerprint sensor.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/30/2017
Comment
Qualcomm Adreno 308: Integrated mid-range graphics card in the Snapdragon 425 SoCs that supports OpenGL ES 3.0 and features unified shaders.
These graphics cards are not suited for Windows 3D games. Office and Internet surfing however is possible.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
425: Entry-level SoC that was announced in February 2016. It integrates 4 ARM Cortex-A53 CPU cores clocked at up to 1.4 GHz, an LPDDR3 memory controller and wireless radios for WiFi and 4G/LTE.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.

