Huawei Y6 2018
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix LED flash
Average of 4 scores (from 10 reviews)
Reviews for the Huawei Y6 2018
Still affordable. The Huawei Y6 2018 is a device that has a lot of power for the money. The device looks modern and has a decent display, but can it be crowned the king of budget devices?
The Huawei Y6 2018 has its imperfections but for an entry-level smartphone, its specs are competitive. While its performance is average, the good viewing experience, camera quality, and face unlock capabilities are what it makes the device unique than the other smartphones out in the market. This device is one of our recommended smartphones if users are tight on budget.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/25/2018
Aside from that, the Y6 2018 will face competition against ASUS’ lite versions of the ZenFone 4 Selfie and Max—both retailing for under Php 8,000. On the local side, there’s the Cloudfone Next Infinity and Cherry Mobile Flare S6 Deluxe: Both sport an 18:9 display, and are priced at Php 6,999 and Php 5,999 respectively.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/23/2018
On the first impression, the Y6 2018’s display has decent viewing angles even on direct sunlight. We have yet tried the Y6 2018 for viewing graphics-heavy content like HD YouTube videos so stay tuned for the full review on our verdict regarding its Fullview display.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/09/2018
Source: Chip.de DE→EN
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/31/2018
Rating: Total score: 63% performance: 65% features: 41% display: 84%
Source: Tech Stage DE→EN
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/14/2018
Source: Curved DE→EN
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/08/2018
Rating: Total score: 69% performance: 65% display: 66% mobility: 80%
Source: Tuexperto ES→EN
Positive: Modern design; nice dual cameras; big screen.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/09/2019
Source: Frandroid FR→EN
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/22/2018
Rating: Total score: 50% performance: 60% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Antyweb PL→EN
Positive: Nice design; large screen; support both dual SIM and microSD card slot; decent speakers. Negative: Poor cameras; low performance; poor display; high price.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/07/2018
Source: The Gioididong VN→EN
Positive: Large screen; decent hardware; nice cameras; impressive design; light weight; low price.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/13/2018
Qualcomm Adreno 308: Integrated mid-range graphics card in the Snapdragon 425 SoCs that supports OpenGL ES 3.0 and features unified shaders.
These graphics cards are not suited for Windows 3D games. Office and Internet surfing however is possible.
425: Entry-level SoC that was announced in February 2016. It integrates 4 ARM Cortex-A53 CPU cores clocked at up to 1.4 GHz, an LPDDR3 memory controller and wireless radios for WiFi and 4G/LTE.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
This display is quite big for a smartphone but frequently used for smartphones.
Large display-sizes allow higher resolutions. So, details like letters are bigger. On the other hand, the power consumption is lower with small screen diagonals and the devices are smaller, more lightweight and cheaper.» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.
Only few smartphones are more lightweight than this.
Huawei: Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. is a Chinese company founded in 1987 with focus on telecommunications hardware and 170000 employees. In the first quarter of 2016, Huawei had a market share of 8.2% in the smartphone market, making it the third-largest smartphone manufacturer in the world. Compared to the same quarter of 2015, Huawei increased its market share by more than 58%.
In 2014, Huawei created the sub brand Honor and offers certain smartphone series under this name. The name Huawei is usually not listed for these products.
There are a lot of reviews on Huawei phones with slightly above average ratings (as of 2016).
65.18%: This rating is bad. Most notebooks are better rated. This is not a recommendation for purchase.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.