Notebookcheck Logo

Huawei Y6p Smartphone Review – Long runtime without Google

The screen is convincing. Positioning yourself in the low-cost smartphone market without Google services could be difficult. The Huawei Y6p is forced to try. With three cameras on the back and a large battery, it has some arguments on its side. In the test, we will take a closer look at the cheap smartphone.
Huawei Y6p
Huawei Y6p (Y6 Series)
Processor
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 8 x 2 GHz, Cortex-A53
Graphics adapter
Memory
3 GB 
Display
6.30 inch 20:9, 1600 x 720 pixel 278 PPI, Capacitive, IPS, glossy: yes, 60 Hz
Storage
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 55 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5mm, Card Reader: microSD up to 512 GB, dedicated, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Acceleration sensor, Proximity sensor, microUSB
Networking
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B4/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B20/​B28/​B34/​B38/​B39/​B40/​B41) , Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 9 x 159.1 x 74.1 ( = 0.35 x 6.26 x 2.92 in)
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix f/1.8, contrast AF, LED flash, video @1080p/30fps (camera 1); 5.0MP, f/2.2, wide angle lens (camera 2); 2.0MP, f/2.4, depth of field (camera 3)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/2.0
Additional features
Speakers: Mono loudspeaker at the lower edge, Keyboard: Virtual, Charger, USB cable, headset, SIM tool, 24 Months Warranty, FM radio; SAR value: 0.81W/kg (head), 1.27W/kg (body) , fanless
Weight
185 g ( = 6.53 oz / 0.41 pounds), Power Supply: 59 g ( = 2.08 oz / 0.13 pounds)
Price
159 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Comparison devices

Bewertung
Rating Version
Datum
Modell
Gewicht
Laufwerk
Groesse
Aufloesung
Preis ab
74.3 %7
09/2020
Huawei Y6p
Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320
185 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.30"1600x720
77 %7
08/2020
Honor 9X Lite
Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4
188 g128 GB eMMC Flash6.50"2340x1080
74.9 %7
10/2020
Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite
Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320
200 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.50"1600x720
76.3 %7
07/2020
Alcatel 3L 2020
Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320
165 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.22"1520x720

Case, equipment and operation - Colorful and fast WLAN

The smartphone is available in three color variants: Phantom Purple, Emerald Green and Midnight Black. The back of the phone has a high-gloss finish and the frame is matt. On the front there is a small waterdrop notch that contains the front camera. The housing is stable and can hardly be twisted, but pressure on the screen is visible in the liquid crystal.

You have to be content with a microUSB port, also there is no NFC, so mobile payment services cannot be used. Instead, the smartphone comes with some LTE frequencies, so there is a higher chance of using mobile Internet when traveling abroad.

Android 10 is installed, but the security patches are already 5 months old at the time of testing. Google Services are not available on the Huawei Y6p, so you have to do without the Play Store and other Google apps. Instead, you can download apps from Huawe's AppGallery, which is filling up with popular apps, but Netflix for example is not yet available.

As far as WLAN is concerned, WiFi 4 is the maximum available, but at a decent speed, as our tests with the reference router Netgear AX12 Nighthawk show.

Huawei Y6p
Huawei Y6p
Huawei Y6p
Huawei Y6p

Size comparison

164.9 mm / 6.49 inch 75.8 mm / 2.98 inch 9.2 mm / 0.3622 inch 200 g0.4409 lbs160.4 mm / 6.31 inch 76.6 mm / 3.02 inch 7.8 mm / 0.3071 inch 188 g0.4145 lbs159.1 mm / 6.26 inch 74.1 mm / 2.92 inch 9 mm / 0.3543 inch 185 g0.4079 lbs158.7 mm / 6.25 inch 74.6 mm / 2.94 inch 8.45 mm / 0.3327 inch 165 g0.3638 lbs148 mm / 5.83 inch 105 mm / 4.13 inch 1 mm / 0.03937 inch 1.5 g0.00331 lbs
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Honor 9X Lite
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
196 (47min - 258max) MBit/s +34%
Huawei Y6p
802.11 b/g/n
146 (127min - 158max) MBit/s
Alcatel 3L 2020
802.11 b/g/n
63.6 (31min - 67max) MBit/s -56%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite
802.11 b/g/n
62.8 (19min - 99max) MBit/s -57%
iperf3 receive AX12
Honor 9X Lite
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
153 (106min - 195max) MBit/s +83%
Huawei Y6p
802.11 b/g/n
83.5 (69min - 90max) MBit/s
Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite
802.11 b/g/n
74.2 (62min - 73max) MBit/s -11%
Alcatel 3L 2020
802.11 b/g/n
67.6 (57min - 73max) MBit/s -19%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150Tooltip
Huawei Y6p; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø83.1 (69-90)
Huawei Y6p; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø145.9 (127-158)

Cameras - Blurred images on all sides

Recording front camera - Normal lighting
Recording front camera - Normal lighting
Recording front camera – LowLight
Recording front camera – LowLight

3 camera lenses shows the Y6p on the back, the main camera has a resolution of 13 megapixels. In addition there is a wide angle camera with 5 megapixels and a depth of field camera. Zooming in several steps between wide angle and main camera is not possible, only direct switching.

The pictures of the main camera are not too badly exposed, but they are a bit poor in detail and not very sharp when you look closer. With weak lighting there is also a lack of sharpness and details, but the brightening is OK. The wide angle lens also takes pictures with little detail. For snapshots the cameras are OK, but if you want more flexibility and a really good camera system, you have to dig deeper into your pocket.

Videos can be recorded in 1080p and 30 fps at most, the autofocus is quite slow here, but otherwise the image quality is OK. The wide angle lens can also be used for videos, but you have to decide on one of the two lenses before you start recording.

The selfie camera of the Huawei Y6p has a resolution of 8 Megapixel. In low light, it is only usable with a bright screen that illuminates the subject. Under normal lighting, the picture is not very sharp in detail, but it is enough for snapshots.

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Hauptobjektiv BlumeHauptobjektiv UmgebungHauptobjektiv Low LightUltraweitwinkel
click to load images
ColorChecker
12.6 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
14.7 ∆E
13 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
11 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
8 ∆E
10 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
12 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
5 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Huawei Y6p: 9.51 ∆E min: 4.23 - max: 14.7 ∆E
ColorChecker
30.4 ∆E
54.8 ∆E
40.1 ∆E
35.7 ∆E
45.6 ∆E
62.4 ∆E
53.7 ∆E
35.6 ∆E
43.4 ∆E
28.6 ∆E
65.1 ∆E
64.3 ∆E
30.6 ∆E
48.1 ∆E
36.9 ∆E
75.9 ∆E
44 ∆E
43.8 ∆E
88.4 ∆E
70.2 ∆E
52 ∆E
37 ∆E
24.4 ∆E
14 ∆E
ColorChecker Huawei Y6p: 46.88 ∆E min: 14.02 - max: 88.4 ∆E

Display - Good color accuracy

Sub-pixel Array
Sub-pixel Array

The Huawei Y6p has an IPS screen with a resolution of 1,600 x 720 pixels. The Honor 9X Lite is a tip for those who are looking for more resolution, but even so, hardly any individual pixels are visible and the display looks relatively sharp.

The brightness of the screen is more convincing: with an average of 538 cd/m², the smartphone is considerably brighter than the comparable devices and can therefore still be used in somewhat brighter environments. Despite the higher brightness, the black level of 0.39 cd/m² is convincing, so that the contrast of 1,444:1 is also quite good.

We don't notice any PWM flickering and the response times of the screen are acceptable.

In our tests with the spectrophotometer and the CalMAN software we found a slight blue cast in the display. But apart from some blue tones, colors and grayscales are reproduced quite realistically. 

544
cd/m²
562
cd/m²
538
cd/m²
561
cd/m²
563
cd/m²
503
cd/m²
566
cd/m²
533
cd/m²
476
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 566 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 538.4 cd/m² Minimum: 2.4 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 84 %
Center on Battery: 563 cd/m²
Contrast: 1444:1 (Black: 0.39 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.52 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 4.9 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
94.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.236
Huawei Y6p
IPS, 1600x720, 6.30
Honor 9X Lite
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.50
Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite
IPS, 1600x720, 6.50
Alcatel 3L 2020
IPS, 1520x720, 6.22
Response Times
0%
-88%
-40%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
36 ?(17, 19)
36 ?(17, 19)
-0%
70.4 ?(29.2, 41.2)
-96%
44.8 ?(20.4, 24.4)
-24%
Response Time Black / White *
18 ?(7, 11)
18 ?(7, 11)
-0%
32.4 ?(13.2, 19.2)
-80%
28 ?(11.6, 16.4)
-56%
PWM Frequency
Screen
-13%
-22%
-7%
Brightness middle
563
435
-23%
493
-12%
463
-18%
Brightness
538
422
-22%
462
-14%
449
-17%
Brightness Distribution
84
93
11%
91
8%
91
8%
Black Level *
0.39
0.77
-97%
0.47
-21%
0.25
36%
Contrast
1444
565
-61%
1049
-27%
1852
28%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.52
3.31
27%
5.7
-26%
6
-33%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
8.86
6.8
23%
12.8
-44%
11.5
-30%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
4.9
3.2
35%
6.8
-39%
6.5
-33%
Gamma
2.236 98%
2.3 96%
2.31 95%
2.3 96%
CCT
7654 85%
6894 94%
7596 86%
8233 79%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-7% / -11%
-55% / -35%
-24% / -14%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
18 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7 ms rise
↘ 11 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 34 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17 ms rise
↘ 19 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.


CalMAN Grayscale
CalMAN Grayscale
CalMAN Color accuracy
CalMAN Color accuracy
CalMAN Color space sRGB
CalMAN Color space sRGB
CalMAN Saturation
CalMAN Saturation

Performance, emissions and battery life - Less power, but long battery life

A MediaTek Helio P22 is responsible for the performance of the Huawei Y6p, although it operates somewhat slower in the Huawei Y6p than, for example, in the Alcatel 3L 2020, possibly due to the smaller RAM. In general, the performance is sufficient for everyday use, but with more complex apps, for example, the volume control comes to a standstill.

In terms of memory speed, the Huawei Y6p with its eMMC flash probably doesn't win any prizes either, but is on a class level overall. The memory card reader also achieves decent transfer rates with our reference microSD Toshiba Exceria Pro M501.

The warming is quite low and should hardly be noticed in everyday life, even under heavy load.

The small mono loudspeaker on the lower edge sounds very high pitched and pleasant in the ear at highest volume. If you lower the volume, the sound is a bit muffled. The sound reproduction via Bluetooth or 3.5mm cable works without problems.

The 5,000-mAh battery has a great runtime of almost 16 hours in our WLAN test. Under normal use, this should be enough for several days without charging. In fact, the Huawei Y6p seems to be quite economical with energy, the Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite with the same size battery does not reach these runtimes. But it's also good that you don't have to charge so often, because due to the missing quick charging technology, charging the high-capacity battery takes quite a long time.

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core (sort by value)
Huawei Y6p
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
136 Points
Honor 9X Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
331 Points +143%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
173 Points +27%
Alcatel 3L 2020
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
147 Points +8%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (134 - 155, n=9)
142.1 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 2138, n=217, last 2 years)
918 Points +575%
Multi-Core (sort by value)
Huawei Y6p
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
488 Points
Honor 9X Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1320 Points +170%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
902 Points +85%
Alcatel 3L 2020
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
863 Points +77%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (475 - 883, n=9)
761 Points +56%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6681, n=217, last 2 years)
3009 Points +517%
PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Huawei Y6p
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
5258 Points
Honor 9X Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
9322 Points +77%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (4404 - 7465, n=18)
5847 Points +11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10884 - 19297, n=2, last 2 years)
15091 Points +187%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Huawei Y6p
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
4323 Points
Honor 9X Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
6887 Points +59%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
5325 Points +23%
Alcatel 3L 2020
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
5227 Points +21%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (3805 - 5380, n=21)
4696 Points +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9101 - 12871, n=4, last 2 years)
10872 Points +151%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y6p
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
11352 Points
Honor 9X Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
21504 Points +89%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
12132 Points +7%
Alcatel 3L 2020
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
13960 Points +23%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (9835 - 13960, n=20)
11460 Points +1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y6p
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
12226 Points
Honor 9X Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
21470 Points +76%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
11217 Points -8%
Alcatel 3L 2020
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
13491 Points +10%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (9536 - 13491, n=20)
11373 Points -7%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Y6p
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
9080 Points
Honor 9X Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
21625 Points +138%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
16978 Points +87%
Alcatel 3L 2020
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
15891 Points +75%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (9080 - 15891, n=20)
12110 Points +33%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Huawei Y6p
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
489 Points
Honor 9X Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1503 Points +207%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
742 Points +52%
Alcatel 3L 2020
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
803 Points +64%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (428 - 830, n=23)
633 Points +29%
Average of class Smartphone
  (712 - 7285, n=50, last 2 years)
3766 Points +670%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Y6p
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
425 Points
Honor 9X Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1355 Points +219%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
675 Points +59%
Alcatel 3L 2020
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
750 Points +76%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (370 - 750, n=23)
572 Points +35%
Average of class Smartphone
  (618 - 9451, n=50, last 2 years)
4186 Points +885%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Y6p
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1044 Points
Honor 9X Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2429 Points +133%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1140 Points +9%
Alcatel 3L 2020
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1064 Points +2%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (854 - 1185, n=23)
1026 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1093 - 4525, n=50, last 2 years)
3082 Points +195%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Huawei Y6p
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
777 Points
Honor 9X Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1518 Points +95%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
830 Points +7%
Alcatel 3L 2020
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
870 Points +12%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (513 - 873, n=23)
770 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (704 - 23024, n=114, last 2 years)
9351 Points +1103%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Y6p
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
722 Points
Honor 9X Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1369 Points +90%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
764 Points +6%
Alcatel 3L 2020
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
823 Points +14%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (452 - 823, n=23)
719 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (607 - 45492, n=113, last 2 years)
16352 Points +2165%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Y6p
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1056 Points
Honor 9X Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2456 Points +133%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1191 Points +13%
Alcatel 3L 2020
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1088 Points +3%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (900 - 1195, n=23)
1032 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1075 - 8749, n=113, last 2 years)
4426 Points +319%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Huawei Y6p
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
288 Points
Honor 9X Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1002 Points +248%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
486 Points +69%
Alcatel 3L 2020
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
440 Points +53%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (269 - 470, n=22)
383 Points +33%
Average of class Smartphone
  (286 - 7890, n=103, last 2 years)
2770 Points +862%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Y6p
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
239 Points
Honor 9X Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
857 Points +259%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
418 Points +75%
Alcatel 3L 2020
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
376 Points +57%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (222 - 405, n=22)
326 Points +36%
Average of class Smartphone
  (240 - 9814, n=103, last 2 years)
2769 Points +1059%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Y6p
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1023 Points
Honor 9X Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2459 Points +140%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1134 Points +11%
Alcatel 3L 2020
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1088 Points +6%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (860 - 1175, n=22)
1022 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (858 - 4679, n=103, last 2 years)
3166 Points +209%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Huawei Y6p
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
457 Points
Honor 9X Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
992 Points +117%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
539 Points +18%
Alcatel 3L 2020
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
494 Points +8%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (426 - 536, n=22)
482 Points +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (317 - 20131, n=180, last 2 years)
6789 Points +1386%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Y6p
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
393 Points
Honor 9X Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
847 Points +116%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
466 Points +19%
Alcatel 3L 2020
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
426 Points +8%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (368 - 467, n=22)
418 Points +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (267 - 33376, n=179, last 2 years)
9811 Points +2396%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Y6p
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1058 Points
Honor 9X Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2479 Points +134%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1193 Points +13%
Alcatel 3L 2020
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1127 Points +7%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (912 - 1188, n=22)
1036 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (938 - 8480, n=179, last 2 years)
4236 Points +300%
GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Y6p
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
6.9 fps
Honor 9X Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
6.4 fps -7%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
6.7 fps -3%
Alcatel 3L 2020
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
7.6 fps +10%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (6.4 - 7.6, n=21)
6.9 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.6 - 123, n=225, last 2 years)
44.2 fps +541%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Y6p
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
3.9 fps
Honor 9X Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
7 fps +79%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
3.8 fps -3%
Alcatel 3L 2020
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
4 fps +3%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (3.5 - 4.7, n=21)
3.81 fps -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.3 - 229, n=225, last 2 years)
64.5 fps +1554%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Y6p
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
4.3 fps
Honor 9X Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
4.2 fps -2%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
4.2 fps -2%
Alcatel 3L 2020
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
4.8 fps +12%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (4.1 - 4.8, n=21)
4.35 fps +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.8 - 119, n=225, last 2 years)
32.9 fps +665%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Y6p
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1.4 fps
Honor 9X Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2.6 fps +86%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1.4 fps 0%
Alcatel 3L 2020
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1.5 fps +7%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (1.3 - 1.6, n=21)
1.39 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 94, n=225, last 2 years)
25.7 fps +1736%
Huawei Y6pHonor 9X LiteMotorola Moto G8 Power LiteAlcatel 3L 2020Average 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
48%
14%
-18%
11%
670%
Sequential Read 256KB
278
286.8
3%
284
2%
287.7
3%
Sequential Write 256KB
160
200.9
26%
226.5
42%
173.4
8%
176.8 ?(40 - 274, n=201)
11%
Random Read 4KB
55.2
44.8
-19%
59.9
9%
20.91
-62%
Random Write 4KB
19.4
72.4
273%
24.17
25%
8.68
-55%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
82.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
76 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-8%
83.4 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
82.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
62.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
69.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
11%
63.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
62 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-1%

Temperature

Max. Load
 40.5 °C
105 F
36.2 °C
97 F
35.3 °C
96 F
 
 40.5 °C
105 F
37.1 °C
99 F
36.1 °C
97 F
 
 39.8 °C
104 F
37.1 °C
99 F
35.6 °C
96 F
 
Maximum: 40.5 °C = 105 F
Average: 37.6 °C = 100 F
34.1 °C
93 F
37.4 °C
99 F
39.7 °C
103 F
35.4 °C
96 F
37.1 °C
99 F
40 °C
104 F
35.2 °C
95 F
37.1 °C
99 F
39.1 °C
102 F
Maximum: 40 °C = 104 F
Average: 37.2 °C = 99 F
Power Supply (max.)  36.8 °C = 98 F | Room Temperature 21.4 °C = 71 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.6 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.5 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.3 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.


Heatmap Back side
Heatmap Back side
Heatmap Front
Heatmap Front

Speakers

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2039.751.12537.343.53129.234.74032.437.7503240.26323.629.58021.721.810021.925.112522.532.116018.539.920014.843.525012.346.831512.553.840011.959.250013.161.463014.56480018.766.9100019.372.7125018.274.3160016.473.2200014.374250014.973315014.668400015.467.1500016.172.5630016.773.2800017.771.81000018.673.41250019.463.61600020.350.4SPL56.366.463.728.783.7N10.719.118.1156.6median 16.4median 66.4median 40.9median 14.9median 70.1Delta3.113.522.813.813.639.739.237.334.929.229.632.432.13240.223.623.721.721.621.930.622.524.418.531.314.84012.339.512.549.111.953.413.156.114.563.818.766.919.370.718.269.416.466.714.366.314.963.814.661.615.469.616.161.416.762.517.769.618.668.119.449.620.350.756.366.463.728.778.610.719.118.1142.6median 16.4median 61.6median 40.9median 14.9median 60.63.111.722.813.818hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHuawei Y6pHonor 9X Lite
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Huawei Y6p audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 70.1% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 70.1% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 70.1% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (118.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 85% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Honor 9X Lite audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 58% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 75% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Battery life

Huawei Y6p
5000 mAh
Honor 9X Lite
3750 mAh
Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite
5000 mAh
Alcatel 3L 2020
4000 mAh
Average of class Smartphone
 
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
953
793
-17%
833
-13%
1456
53%
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
15h 53min

Pros

+ long battery life
+ stable case
+ true color screen without PWM
+ hardly any heating
+ relatively many LTE frequencies
+ fast WLAN in class comparison

Cons

- poorly detailed camera images
- no Google services
- outdated security patches
- no NFC
- weak power
- mediocre speaker

Verdict - Standard smartphone with a good screen

In review: Huawei Y6p. Test device provided by:
In review: Huawei Y6p. Test device provided by:
notebooksbilliger.de

The Huawei Y6p is a reasonably equipped entry-level smartphone with good battery life. The fact that it is not suitable for everyone is due to the lack of Google services, which makes it difficult to access many popular apps.

If you can live with it, you can get three cameras for quite little money, but only two of them effectively take pictures, and that with quite blurry details. The processing power of the smartphone is OK for its price range, but by no means outstanding. The screen is good, displaying colors quite well, offering good contrast and even at low brightness it doesn't flicker.

The Huawei Y6p is a cheap smartphone with a long battery life, a good screen and limitations in the availability of apps.

If you know what you're getting into when you don't have Google services, if you don't care much about the camera and don't need a lot of power, you can take a look at the cheap Y6p.

Huawei Y6p - 09/02/2020 v7
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
80%
Keyboard
65 / 75 → 87%
Pointing Device
89%
Connectivity
39 / 70 → 56%
Weight
89%
Battery
91%
Display
84%
Games Performance
6 / 64 → 10%
Application Performance
48 / 86 → 56%
Temperature
89%
Noise
100%
Audio
60 / 90 → 67%
Camera
45%
Average
68%
74%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Read all 1 comments / answer
static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > Huawei Y6p Smartphone Review – Long runtime without Google
Florian Schmitt, 2020-09- 2 (Update: 2020-09- 2)