Wiko View 4

Specifications

Pricecompare

Reviews for the Wiko View 4

Wiko View 4 Gute Kamera und starker Akku im Billig-Smartphone
Source: WinFuture DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/07/2020

60% Wiko View 4 Drei Tage wach
Source: Android Pit DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/13/2020
Rating: Total score: 60%

70% Prueba Wiko View4, con la autonomía por bandera
Source: Zona Movilidad ES→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/01/2020
Rating: Total score: 70%

74% Wiko View4, análisis y opinión
Source: Computerhoy ES→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/14/2020
Rating: Total score: 74% features: 60% display: 70% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%

62% Wiko View 4, análisis: batería y nada más
Source: MuyComputer ES→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/21/2020
Rating: Total score: 62% performance: 60% display: 60% mobility: 100% workmanship: 40%

55% Análise Wiko View4. Power para três dias
Source: Android Geek PT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/26/2020
Rating: Total score: 55% performance: 56% workmanship: 60%

70% Wiko View4
Source: PC Guia PT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/09/2020
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 90%

80% Recensione Wiko View4 by Smartphone italia
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/27/2020
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 90% features: 70% display: 70% mobility: 100% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%

75% Recensione Wiko View 4
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/09/2020
Rating: Total score: 75% price: 75% features: 70% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 65% ergonomy: 65%

Unboxing Wiko View4 by Smartphone italia
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Premium design; metal case; solid workmanship; powerful hardware; high performance; large battery capacity.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/13/2020

50% Test du Wiko View 4 : l’autonomie pour véritable argument
Source: Frandroid FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/26/2020
Rating: Total score: 50% performance: 30% display: 60% mobility: 90% workmanship: 60%

60% Wiko View4 : Endurant et bien plus encore
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/07/2020
Rating: Total score: 60%

Wiko View 4 et View 4 Lite officialisés : notre prise en main… sans empreintes digitales
Source: Frandroid FR→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Powerful hardware; high performance; premium design; metal case; solid workmanship; nice cameras.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/20/2020

Comment

Imagination PowerVR GE8320: Integrated graphics card for mid-range ARM SoCs.

These graphics cards are not suited for Windows 3D games. Office and Internet surfing however is possible.

» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.

Helio A25: ARM based octa core SoC (8x ARM Cortex-A53) clocked at up to 1.8 GHz. The chip also includes a Cat.4 LTE modem.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.

6.52":

It is a small display format for smartphones. You shouldn't be severely defective in vision, and you won't see much detail on the screen and only have a small resolution available. For that, the device should be small and handy, easy to transport.

Wiko:

Wiko SAS was founded as a French smartphone manufacturer in 2011. Since 2014, the Chinese technology group Tinno Mobile has owned a majority of Wiko. They produce in China. The company has already reached a considerable market share in the French market in early years and expanded to Europe and Africa later on. Nevertheless, the world market share is low.

Reviews are only available since 2014, that is since the first international expansion. Recently, the number of reviews has increased. The ratings are average (as of 2016).

66.48%: This rating is poor. More than three quarters of the models are rated better. That is rather not a purchase recommendation. Even if verbal ratings in this area do not sound that bad ("sufficient" or "satisfactory"), they are usually euphemisms that disguise a classification as a below-average laptop.

» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.

Similar devices with the Same Specs

Similar devices from a different Manufacturer

Devices from a different Manufacturer and/or with a different CPU