ZTE Blade Series
Processor: SC9863A, T618, unknown, Mediatek Helio 20 Helio P22 MT6762, Mediatek MT6572, Mediatek MT6582M, Mediatek MT6735, Mediatek MT6735P, Mediatek MT6737, Mediatek MT6750, Mediatek MT6753, Spreadtrum SC7731, Mediatek Mediatek Helio P60, Mediatek Mediatek Helio P70, Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939, Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952, Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 MSM7227A, Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225Q, Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 450, Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 765GGraphics Adapter: unknown, ARM Mali-400 MP, ARM Mali-400 MP2, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, ARM Mali-G72 MP3, ARM Mali-T720, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, Imagination PowerVR GE8320, PowerVR GE8322 / IMG8322, Qualcomm Adreno 200, Qualcomm Adreno 306, Qualcomm Adreno 405, Qualcomm Adreno 505, Qualcomm Adreno 506, Qualcomm Adreno 620
Display: 4.00 inch, 5.00 inch, 5.20 inch, 5.45 inch, 5.50 inch, 5.70 inch, 6.00 inch, 6.26 inch, 6.30 inch, 6.49 inch, 6.50 inch, 6.52 inch, 6.53 inch, 6.67 inch, 6.82 inch
Weight: 0.118kg, 0.12kg, 0.13kg, 0.134kg, 0.135kg, 0.136kg, 0.14kg, 0.141kg, 0.142kg, 0.143kg, 0.145kg, 0.149kg, 0.153kg, 0.154kg, 0.156kg, 0.157kg, 0.16kg, 0.165kg, 0.17kg, 0.175kg, 0.18kg, 0.185kg, 0.189kg, 0.19kg, 0.193kg, 0.196kg, 0.21kg
Price: 100, 129, 150, 169, 179, 180, 199, 200, 249, 250, 259, 269, 280, 300, 400 euro
Average of 175 scores (from 351 reviews)
ZTE Blade III
Specifications
Notebook: ZTE Blade IIIProcessor: Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 MSM7227A
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 200
Display: 4.00 inch, 16:10, 800 x 480 pixels
Weight: 0.13kg
Price: 199 euro
Links: ZTE homepage
Price comparison
Reviews
An offer you can't resist? ZTE's Blade III is a 4 inch smartphone that is available for less than 100 Euros (~$133) on the internet. Is it worth the money or are there better offers for users looking for an entry-level smartphone?
Foreign Reviews
ZTE Blade V
Specifications
Notebook: ZTE Blade VProcessor: Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225Q
Graphics Adapter: unknown
Display: 4.00 inch, 5:3, 800 x 480 pixels
Weight: 0.13kg
Price: 200 euro
Links: ZTE homepage Blade V (Model)
Price comparison
Average Score:
Reviews
Source: Gadgetspeak Archive.org version
Remembering that this is a budget priced smartphone costing well under £100, its performance is more than reasonable. In a head-to-head contest with the recently released Moto G, it would come in second with regards to speed, functionality and video display but then the Moto G lacks the micro SD option and costs around £50 more.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/30/2014
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% performance: 60%
ZTE Blade L2
Specifications
Notebook: ZTE Blade L2Processor: Mediatek MT6582M
Graphics Adapter: ARM Mali-400 MP2
Display: 5.00 inch, 16:9, 854 x 480 pixels
Weight: 0.17kg
Price: 100 euro
Links: ZTE homepage Blade L2 (Model)
Price comparison
Average Score:
Reviews
Source: Tech Advisor Archive.org version
The Blade L2 has a lot to offer at just £89, with a quad-core processor, a large screen and support for microSDXC. But while it may be faster than the Motorola Moto E, in many respects the ZTE is the inferior phone - and not just in terms of its build quality. This super-budget smartphone even gets shown up by the significantly cheaper ZTE Kis 3.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/04/2014
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 90% performance: 70% features: 70% workmanship: 60%
Foreign Reviews
ZTE Blade S6
The ZTE Blade S6 is a mid-range smartphone which runs on the Android OS v5 (Lollipop). The rounded corners and curved sides of this ZTE smartphone highly resemble the Apple iPhone 6, however the body of the Blade 6 is made up of plastic which is coated to give it a smooth satin finish. It only comes in one color which is white with a gray back. On the back of the smartphone is its speaker. The home button on front has a blue glow which serves as an indication for notifications. The Blade 6 has a 5-inch display with a resolution of 720p with vibrant colors. LTE is supported on this smartphone with Dual SIM (dual stand-by). The device is powered by an octa-core 64 bit Snapdragon processor and an Adreno 405 GPU with 2 GB of RAM. In terms of storage capability, this ZTE smartphone has 16 GB of onboard memory. The memory capacity can be expanded by up to 64 GB with a micro SD card. There are a secondary 5 MP front facing camera and a 13 MP rear camera, which can record videos in 1080p@30fps and provides decent imaging capabilities. Finally, the 2400 mAh battery lasts a day of regular use. All in all, this smartphone provides a mid-range Android experience at an inexpensive price.Specifications
Notebook: ZTE Blade S6Processor: Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 405
Display: 5.00 inch, 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixels
Weight: 0.134kg
Price: 259 euro
Links: ZTE homepage Blade S6 (Model)
Price comparison
Average Score:
Reviews
Short blade. ZTE's Blade S6 is located in the upper mid-range. The 5-inch smartphone wants to attract buyers with plenty of RAM, a high-resolution camera, and decent performance. Find out in our review why the phone from China is not very enduring.
Source: Expert Reviews Archive.org version
The ZTE Blade S6 may be faster than the 3rd Gen Moto G, but when Motorola's handset is better made and has a superior camera and battery life, the money you save with the Blade S6 starts to feel like a false economy. There's also the Vodafone Smart Ultra 6 to consider, which is arguably better value than both handsets as long as you don't mind switching to Vodafone. The Blade S6 certainly hits hard in the budget smartphone arena, but it lacks the stamina to really go head-to-head with Android's cut-price heavyweights.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/21/2015
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Expert Reviews Archive.org version
The ZTE Blade S6 may be faster than the 3rd Gen Moto G, but when Motorola's handset is better made and has a superior camera and battery life, the money you save with the Blade S6 starts to feel like a false economy. There's also the Vodafone Smart Ultra 6 to consider, which is arguably better value than both handsets as long as you don't mind switching to Vodafone. The Blade S6 certainly hits hard in the budget smartphone arena, but it lacks the stamina to really go head-to-head with Android's cut-price heavyweights.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/21/2015
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Gadgetspeak Archive.org version
While the big boys in the arena of Smartphone manufacturing tend to price their hardware at a level that many of us find incompatible with our financial constraints, other manufacturers of these “must-have devices” have a more economically viable approach to the pricing of their various models.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/08/2015
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 60% performance: 80%
Source: Gadgetspeak Archive.org version
While the big boys in the arena of Smartphone manufacturing tend to price their hardware at a level that many of us find incompatible with our financial constraints, other manufacturers of these “must-have devices” have a more economically viable approach to the pricing of their various models.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/08/2015
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 60% performance: 80%
Source: Trusted Reviews Archive.org version
We like what the ZTE Blade S6 is about. It wants to get you something a bit snazzier and more powerful than an ‘upper-entry’ level model like the Motorola Moto G, while still staying significantly below £200. We’re just not all that sure about how ZTE has handled it. The custom UI feels a little unprofessional in parts, and some of the custom software loaded onto the ZTE Blade S6 is rubbish.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/02/2015
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 80% performance: 60% features: 70% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 60%
Source: Trusted Reviews Archive.org version
We like what the ZTE Blade S6 is about. It wants to get you something a bit snazzier and more powerful than an ‘upper-entry’ level model like the Motorola Moto G, while still staying significantly below £200. We’re just not all that sure about how ZTE has handled it. The custom UI feels a little unprofessional in parts, and some of the custom software loaded onto the ZTE Blade S6 is rubbish.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/02/2015
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 80% performance: 60% features: 70% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 60%
Source: Gadgetguy Archive.org version
While the name could certainly do with some work — seriously ZTE, you’re not fooling anyone that this is an S6 — as could the style and design — again, you’re not fooling anyone that this isn’t an iPhone — ZTE’s take on what constitutes a mid-range phone for a less-than mid-range price is intriguing, and would certainly be compelling for someone keen for a new phone who has no qualms about trying a brand that isn’t totally recognisable.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/26/2015
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 100% performance: 70% features: 80% workmanship: 60%
Source: Gadgetguy Archive.org version
While the name could certainly do with some work — seriously ZTE, you’re not fooling anyone that this is an S6 — as could the style and design — again, you’re not fooling anyone that this isn’t an iPhone — ZTE’s take on what constitutes a mid-range phone for a less-than mid-range price is intriguing, and would certainly be compelling for someone keen for a new phone who has no qualms about trying a brand that isn’t totally recognisable.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/26/2015
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 100% performance: 70% features: 80% workmanship: 60%
Source: Cool Smartphone Archive.org version
It has been nice to use the ZTE Blade S6 over the last week as it has been refreshing to see such a new phone from a Chinese manufacturer coming straight to market. Beyond the initial launcher it is a clean(ish) Android Lollipop experience. Whilst it does have some shortcomings in a few areas, this is a good all-round device. If only it had a slightly better battery then it would not be that far off being a genuine Mid tier champion.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/06/2015
Rating: Total score: 84% price: 82% ergonomy: 83%
Source: Cool Smartphone Archive.org version
It has been nice to use the ZTE Blade S6 over the last week as it has been refreshing to see such a new phone from a Chinese manufacturer coming straight to market. Beyond the initial launcher it is a clean(ish) Android Lollipop experience. Whilst it does have some shortcomings in a few areas, this is a good all-round device. If only it had a slightly better battery then it would not be that far off being a genuine Mid tier champion.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/06/2015
Rating: Total score: 84% price: 82% ergonomy: 83%
Source: IT Pro Portal Archive.org version
Obviously, given the interior excellence, compromises would have to be made to keep the ZTE competitively priced. You’ll find those compromises most evident within the design, screen and battery power the phone affords. But the phone truly excels in other areas. Especially thanks to an exceptional combination of software and hardware.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 05/02/2015
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: IT Pro Portal Archive.org version
Obviously, given the interior excellence, compromises would have to be made to keep the ZTE competitively priced. You’ll find those compromises most evident within the design, screen and battery power the phone affords. But the phone truly excels in other areas. Especially thanks to an exceptional combination of software and hardware.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 05/02/2015
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Cool Smartphone Archive.org version
t’s another day and the review kit is coming thick and fast. Today we have the ZTE Blade S6 4G, an affordable Android Lollipop phone sitting in the mid level price bracket (currently £189 on Amazon). The phone is available now, and we had a brief hands on with this phone whilst at MWC in March. We were (say that 3 times fast) quite taken with it
video review
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 04/23/2015
Source: Cool Smartphone Archive.org version
t’s another day and the review kit is coming thick and fast. Today we have the ZTE Blade S6 4G, an affordable Android Lollipop phone sitting in the mid level price bracket (currently £189 on Amazon). The phone is available now, and we had a brief hands on with this phone whilst at MWC in March. We were (say that 3 times fast) quite taken with it
video review
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 04/23/2015
Source: Fudzilla Archive.org version
The ZTE Blade S6 is an interesting package – it’s a good all-round performer, but it doesn’t stand out in any department. Some may argue that this is sort of the point of mid-range devices, and we feel ZTE just wanted to design a straightforward phone with a good price tag. There’s nothing wrong with that and we like what they came up with.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/10/2015
Source: Fudzilla Archive.org version
The ZTE Blade S6 is an interesting package – it’s a good all-round performer, but it doesn’t stand out in any department. Some may argue that this is sort of the point of mid-range devices, and we feel ZTE just wanted to design a straightforward phone with a good price tag. There’s nothing wrong with that and we like what they came up with.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/10/2015
Source: Recombu Archive.org version
The Blade S6 is a decent mid-range handset, packing the major features that you’d expect such as 4G support. At around £170 it’s worthy competition for the Moto G, packing a similarly bright 5-inch 720p screen and a reasonably reliable 13-megapixel camera, although we’re not sold on ZTE’s Android tweaks and the plastic shell scuffs up rather easily.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 04/04/2015
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Recombu Archive.org version
The Blade S6 is a decent mid-range handset, packing the major features that you’d expect such as 4G support. At around £170 it’s worthy competition for the Moto G, packing a similarly bright 5-inch 720p screen and a reasonably reliable 13-megapixel camera, although we’re not sold on ZTE’s Android tweaks and the plastic shell scuffs up rather easily.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 04/04/2015
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Techradar Archive.org version
ZTE has turned out a highly capable Android smartphone for a very reasonable price. In terms of power and photographic capabilities, it wipes the floor with the Motorola Moto G, which is only a little cheaper. However, ZTE could learn a thing or two about design from the current budget champ, as the Blade S6 simply doesn't look or feel very nice in the hand.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/22/2015
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Techradar Archive.org version
ZTE has turned out a highly capable Android smartphone for a very reasonable price. In terms of power and photographic capabilities, it wipes the floor with the Motorola Moto G, which is only a little cheaper. However, ZTE could learn a thing or two about design from the current budget champ, as the Blade S6 simply doesn't look or feel very nice in the hand.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/22/2015
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Tech Advisor Archive.org version
At a touch over £150 the ZTE Blade S6 is a great-value Android Lollipop phone with strong general performance and an attractive iPhone 6-like build. Dual-SIM and 4G LTE connectivity, a selection of smart gestures and a capable Sony camera all add to this phone's appeal, but its battery life is no better than average and we're not so keen on the idea of having all our apps by default laid bare on the home screen.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 03/09/2015
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 90% performance: 80% features: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Tech Advisor Archive.org version
At a touch over £150 the ZTE Blade S6 is a great-value Android Lollipop phone with strong general performance and an attractive iPhone 6-like build. Dual-SIM and 4G LTE connectivity, a selection of smart gestures and a capable Sony camera all add to this phone's appeal, but its battery life is no better than average and we're not so keen on the idea of having all our apps by default laid bare on the home screen.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 03/09/2015
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 90% performance: 80% features: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: GSM Arena Archive.org version
The ZTE Blade S6 is definitely an eye-catcher but the iPhone looks may be doing it more harm than favors at some markets. Apple is a natural target for replicas - there are blatant copycats and then there are phones like the Blade S6, which manage to retain an identity if their own. Still, brands like ZTE and Lenovo don't have to go there to get noticed.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/23/2015
Source: GSM Arena Archive.org version
The ZTE Blade S6 is definitely an eye-catcher but the iPhone looks may be doing it more harm than favors at some markets. Apple is a natural target for replicas - there are blatant copycats and then there are phones like the Blade S6, which manage to retain an identity if their own. Still, brands like ZTE and Lenovo don't have to go there to get noticed.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/23/2015
Foreign Reviews
Source: MobiFlip DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/19/2015
Source: MobiFlip DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/19/2015
Source: Allround-PC.com DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/16/2015
Source: Allround-PC.com DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/16/2015
Source: Area DVD DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/01/2015
Source: Area DVD DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/01/2015
Source: Area DVD - Heft 6/2015
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 05/01/2015
Rating: Total score: 82%
Source: Area DVD - Heft 6/2015
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 05/01/2015
Rating: Total score: 82%
Source: Chip.de DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/23/2015
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 79% performance: 81% features: 80% display: 93% mobility: 72%
Source: Chip.de DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/23/2015
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 79% performance: 81% features: 80% display: 93% mobility: 72%
Source: Tom's Hardware DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/01/2015
Source: Tom's Hardware DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/01/2015
ZTE Blade S6 Plus
In this modern age, where smartphones come with all sorts of fancy additives and features, one might struggle to find a fuss free but practical phone that gives users easy usability but comes with a reasonable price tag. In steps the ZTE Blade S6 Plus. The external design of this smartphone may not look very original, as it bears a strong resemblance to many generic boxy designs. However, one must not judge its by appearances alone. IPS LCD display screen measures 5.5 inches with a 720p resolution and a pixel density of 267 ppi. The IPS technology is especially crucial for color vibrancy, brightness and viewing angles. As to the hardware in this phone, we start with a Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 64-bit octa core processor with a clock rate of 1.5 GHz. This is paired with an Adreno 405 GPU and 2 GB of RAM. The octa core processor and the other equally impressive hardware ensure that the smartphone responds rapidly and efficiently with no hint of a lag. Additionally there is a 16 GB built-in storage which can be expanded by up to 32 GB with a microSD card. The memory is partitioned: a 4.29 GB area for the system function, a 3.87 GB area for apps and the remaining 7.83 GB for various user data and entertainment.Specifications
Notebook: ZTE Blade S6 PlusProcessor: Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 405
Display: 5.50 inch, 16:9, 280 x 720 pixels
Weight: 0.14kg
Price: 300 euro
Links: ZTE homepage
Price comparison
Average Score:
Reviews
Source: Tech Advisor Archive.org version
The ZTE Blade S6 Plus is a nice phablet for £200, but it doesn't offer enough to make it worth an extra £50 on top of the standard model, which already has a large 5in screen. In comparison to that phone it's lost some of the features we liked, and despite having a larger battery runtime still isn't great. If you're looking for a 5.5in phablet at £200, our money would be on the Kingzone Z1.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 04/30/2015
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% performance: 80% features: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: Android Authority Archive.org version
The ZTE Blade S6 Plus is available globally now from eBay and several other different online retailers. For the launch there is a special discounted price of $269.99 (which is £182.99 or €252.99). It’s normal retail price will be $299. For those in European and Asian markets, this device is a very solid wallet-friendly smartphone that you should definitely consider if you are looking for a device with a larger display.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/08/2015
Rating: Total score: 85%
Foreign Reviews
Source: MobiFlip DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/04/2015
Source: Pocket Navigation DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/02/2015
ZTE Blade L3
The ZTE Blade L3 is a surprisingly stylish and thin smartphone. Like all current smartphones, it has a capacitive TFT touchscreen. This 5 inch screen features 16 M colors and a resolution of 480 x 854 pixels and supports multi touch input. The smartphone with a quad core processor clocked at up to 1,3 GHz and 1 GB RAM runs Android OS v5.0, (Lollipop). Additionally, the L3 features a dual sim function, a microSD slot with up to 32 GB, in addition to the 8 GB internal storage. It comes with a 8 MP rear camera with autofocus, LED flash and geo-tagging function, which can capture up to 3264 x 2448 pixels, and a secondary front camera with a resolution of only 2 MP. The smartphone comes with a speaker and a standard 3.5 mm jack located on the bottom of the smartphone frame. Finally, it delivers the standard connectivity features with 11 b/g/n WiFi with hotspot function, Bluetooth 4.0, and a built-in GPS. The smartphone charges via the microUSB 2.0 port which it has located directly bottom of the screen in the smartphone frame and is powered by a 2000 mAh lithium ion battery. It is sold in only two colors, which are black and white.Specifications
Notebook: ZTE Blade L3Processor: Mediatek MT6582M
Graphics Adapter: ARM Mali-400 MP2
Display: 5.00 inch, 16:9, 854 x 480 pixels
Weight: 0.154kg
Price: 100 euro
Links: ZTE homepage Blade L3 (Model)
Price comparison
Average Score:
Reviews
Source: Gadgetspeak Archive.org version
Although the Blade L3 felt comfortable in the hand, it did have a tendency to slip and slide if not gripped firmly or when it was placed on a sloping surface. The unit’s screen was reasonably responsive to touch and gestures but did suffer a little from finger smears although not as much as some handsets I have used.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/25/2015
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 80% performance: 60%
ZTE Blade V6
Specifications
Notebook: ZTE Blade V6Processor: Mediatek MT6735
Graphics Adapter: ARM Mali-T720 MP2
Display: 5.00 inch, 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixels
Weight: 0.12kg
Price: 250 euro
Links: ZTE homepage
Price comparison
Average Score:
Reviews
Sturdy aluminum blade. ZTE’s new mainstream smartphone, Blade V6, attracts attention mainly due to its well-built and slim aluminum chassis. However, is this enough to compete with the similarly equipped rivals?
Source: The Mobile Indian Archive.org version
ZTE Blade V6 is good looking and offers a decent performance. But in terms of specs, it isn't the best out there. Also, I could not find it on any e-retailer's website but it's a decent purchase at Rs 9,999.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 09/05/2016
Source: The Mobile Indian Archive.org version
ZTE Blade V6 is good looking and offers a decent performance. But in terms of specs, it isn't the best out there. Also, I could not find it on any e-retailer's website but it's a decent purchase at Rs 9,999.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 09/05/2016
Source: Fone Arena Archive.org version
The ZTE Blade V6 is no competition for any of the existing online smartphones (e.g. Redmi Note 3) at this price point. The only good part about this smartphone is that it boasts of a really good and premium design that no other competitor is offering. One more thing goes in the favour of Blade V6 and that is its availability in offline retail, where consumers prefer having a look at the phone. But then of course it is average on performance and all other aspects.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/30/2016
Source: Fone Arena Archive.org version
The ZTE Blade V6 is no competition for any of the existing online smartphones (e.g. Redmi Note 3) at this price point. The only good part about this smartphone is that it boasts of a really good and premium design that no other competitor is offering. One more thing goes in the favour of Blade V6 and that is its availability in offline retail, where consumers prefer having a look at the phone. But then of course it is average on performance and all other aspects.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/30/2016
Source: NDTV Gadgets Archive.org version
It's not really clear why ZTE chose to launch this model now, especially when it has already shown of its successor at this year's Mobile World Congress. The Blade V6 is priced at Rs. 9,999 and is currently only available at Hotshot retail outlets in Delhi. The nice design and decent battery life aside, there's really nothing else going for the phone to warrant a purchase. The dated software and security patch are two of its biggest flaws and are good enough reasons to avoid this altogether.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/24/2016
Rating: Total score: 50% price: 50% performance: 60% display: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 70%
Source: NDTV Gadgets Archive.org version
It's not really clear why ZTE chose to launch this model now, especially when it has already shown of its successor at this year's Mobile World Congress. The Blade V6 is priced at Rs. 9,999 and is currently only available at Hotshot retail outlets in Delhi. The nice design and decent battery life aside, there's really nothing else going for the phone to warrant a purchase. The dated software and security patch are two of its biggest flaws and are good enough reasons to avoid this altogether.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/24/2016
Rating: Total score: 50% price: 50% performance: 60% display: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 70%
Source: Gadgets Now Archive.org version
ZTE Blade V6 sure has got our positive feedback on the premium looking design and its processing power. The display too is bright and good. With a 13MP camera and an above-average display, the Blade V6 is definitely worth its price tag. However, the handset's closest competitor is its own sibling, the Blade S6 Plus, with same specifications except for a slightly larger display and 1GB extra RAM. It is priced at Rs 10,000. Some of the other competitors are Asus Zenfone Max, Redmi Note 3, Lenovo and more.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 08/16/2016
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Gadgets Now Archive.org version
ZTE Blade V6 sure has got our positive feedback on the premium looking design and its processing power. The display too is bright and good. With a 13MP camera and an above-average display, the Blade V6 is definitely worth its price tag. However, the handset's closest competitor is its own sibling, the Blade S6 Plus, with same specifications except for a slightly larger display and 1GB extra RAM. It is priced at Rs 10,000. Some of the other competitors are Asus Zenfone Max, Redmi Note 3, Lenovo and more.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 08/16/2016
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Techradar Archive.org version
The battle for the ZTE Blade V6 will be won and loss with its price tag. Make it competitive with the Moto G and ZTE could be onto a winner, but price it too high and there are better options out there. The Blade V6 is well designed, packs some solid features and the inclusion of stock Android helps to elevate above rival Chinese handsets from Huawei and co.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 09/02/2015
Source: Techradar Archive.org version
The battle for the ZTE Blade V6 will be won and loss with its price tag. Make it competitive with the Moto G and ZTE could be onto a winner, but price it too high and there are better options out there. The Blade V6 is well designed, packs some solid features and the inclusion of stock Android helps to elevate above rival Chinese handsets from Huawei and co.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 09/02/2015
Foreign Reviews
Source: Stiftung Warentest - Heft 5/2016
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 04/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 76%
Source: Stiftung Warentest - Heft 5/2016
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 04/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 76%
Source: Teltarif DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/22/2015
Rating: Total score: 90% features: 90% workmanship: 87% ergonomy: 92%
Source: Teltarif DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/22/2015
Rating: Total score: 90% features: 90% workmanship: 87% ergonomy: 92%
Source: Chip.de DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 09/11/2015
Rating: Total score: 85% price: 75% features: 96% display: 80% mobility: 78%
Source: Chip.de DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 09/11/2015
Rating: Total score: 85% price: 75% features: 96% display: 80% mobility: 78%
Source: Turn On DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/19/2015
Source: Turn On DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/19/2015
ZTE Blade V220
The ZTE Blade V220, or ZTE V5 Lux, is the smaller sibling of the ZTE Blade S6, which was released at the same time. This device is equipped with a Qualcomm MSM8916 Snapdragon 410 quad core processor clocked at 1.2 GHz and an Adreno 306 GPU. This is not going to take over any flagship phones out there, but it is very reasonable for its mid-range price tag. The 5.0 inch capacitive touchscreen features IPS technology, 16 M colors and a resolution of 720 x 1280 pixels (~294 ppi pixel density). It does not have the greatest resolution, but the viewing angles are stunning for this device. The 13 MP rear camera features a resolution of 4128 x 3096 pixels, autofocus and a LED flash and is capable of recording 1080p@30fps videos, while the one on the front side is just a 5 MP, 1080p camera. The internal memory is 8 GB and the device supports microSDs up to 32 GB. The few interfaces available are a 3.5 mm headphone jack and microUSB v2.0. This phone is rather suitable for those looking for a decent mid-range phone for a good price.Specifications
Notebook: ZTE Blade V220Processor: Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 306
Display: 5.00 inch, 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixels
Weight: 0.14kg
Price: 200 euro
Links: ZTE homepage Blade V220 (Model)
Price comparison
Average Score:
Foreign Reviews
Source: Netzwelt DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/06/2015
Rating: Total score: 66% features: 80% mobility: 60% workmanship: 80%
ZTE Blade A452
The ZTE Blade A452 is a classy looking smartphone that is bang for the buck. With just 158 g and a thickness of just 9.25 mm, the device fits perfectly in hand even with the somewhat large display. The back panel is simple and bottom is perforated for sound to escape the speaker. There are several colors to choose; white, black and gold. The dual-SIM device comes with a 5.0 inch IPS LCD touchscreen with 294 PPI pixel density. This allows for vivid and clear image quality, which is great for multimedia purposes. On-board is a Cortex-A53 quad-core processor clocked at 1 GHz, 1 GB of RAM and a Mali-T720MP2 GPU. Storage on the ZTE Blade A452 is 8 GB and the storage capacity can be expanded by 64 GB thanks to microSD support. There is a primary 8 MP autofocus rear camera and a 5 MP front camera. The Android 5.1 Lollipop system comes with Bluetooth 4.0, A-GPS, microUSB v2.0, and an FM radio module. Battery life on the device is provided by a non-removable lithium ion pack rated at 4000 mAh. Overall, the ZTE Blade A452 is a decent smartphone at low cost.Specifications
Notebook: ZTE Blade A452Processor: Mediatek MT6735
Graphics Adapter: ARM Mali-T720
Display: 5.00 inch, 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixels
Weight: 0.157kg
Price: 150 euro
Links: ZTE homepage
Price comparison
Average Score:
Reviews
Big battery. While focus is placed on a thin-as-possible line in many other smartphones, ZTE's Blade A456 sacrifices that for a relatively generously sized 4000 mAh battery. Our report reveals whether that also ensures a long battery life.
Foreign Reviews
Source: Netzwelt DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/04/2016
Rating: Total score: 73% features: 70% mobility: 100% workmanship: 80%
Source: Netzwelt DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/04/2016
Rating: Total score: 73% features: 70% mobility: 100% workmanship: 80%
Source: Teltarif DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/18/2016
Rating: Total score: 86% features: 80% workmanship: 90% ergonomy: 90%
Source: Teltarif DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/18/2016
Rating: Total score: 86% features: 80% workmanship: 90% ergonomy: 90%
Source: Tom's Hardware DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/09/2016
Source: Tom's Hardware DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/09/2016
Source: Netzwelt DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/28/2016
Rating: Total score: 72% features: 70% mobility: 100% workmanship: 80%
Source: Netzwelt DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/28/2016
Rating: Total score: 72% features: 70% mobility: 100% workmanship: 80%
ZTE Blade V7
The ZTE Blade V7 is a Dual SIM smartphone with good performance for an affordable price. The Android OS v6.0 (Marshmallow) system features a capacitive 5.2 inch IPS LCD touchscreen with a resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels and multi-touch support, a 1.3 GHz Cortex-A53 octa core processor with Mediatek MT6753 chipset, a Mali-T720MP3 GPU, 16 GB storage and 2 GB RAM. The storage of the smartphone can be expanded by using a microSD card with up to 256 GB. The smartphone's 13 MP rear camera features phase detection autofocus, dual-LED (dual tone) flash, geo-tagging, touch focus, face detection, HDR and panorama. In addition, it is capable of recording 1080p videos at 30 fps. The 5 MP front camera is decent for normal usage. The lithium ion battery rated at 2500 mAh is not removable. The connectivity includes WiFi, Bluetooth v4.0, GPS, FM Radio and a microUSB v2.0 port. In addition, the smartphone features an accelerometer, a gyroscope, a proximity sensor and a compass.Specifications
Notebook: ZTE Blade V7Processor: Mediatek MT6753
Graphics Adapter: ARM Mali-T720 MP4
Display: 5.20 inch, 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.136kg
Price: 249 euro
Links: ZTE homepage
Price comparison
Average Score:
Reviews
All-rounder. The Blade V7 is the newest mid-price product in ZTE's successful Blade lineup. The device offers a decent configuration at a fair price of 250 Euros (~$282, RRP). Read in our report whether the manufacturer has eliminated the former model's drawbacks and improved in the right places.
Source: Mobile Choice Archive.org version
At £129, this is one of the best budget handsets available to buy right now. If you buy it from Three on a pay monthly contract, expect to pay less than £10 for it. In terms of value for money, the Blade V7 is hard to beat. We do miss the presence of a fingerprint sensor and it would be good to have a slightly higher specced battery but at that price we are definitely not complaining!
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/18/2017
Rating: Total score: 90% performance: 60% mobility: 80%
Source: Mobile Choice Archive.org version
At £129, this is one of the best budget handsets available to buy right now. If you buy it from Three on a pay monthly contract, expect to pay less than £10 for it. In terms of value for money, the Blade V7 is hard to beat. We do miss the presence of a fingerprint sensor and it would be good to have a slightly higher specced battery but at that price we are definitely not complaining!
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/18/2017
Rating: Total score: 90% performance: 60% mobility: 80%
Foreign Reviews
Source: Android Mag DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/28/2016
Rating: Total score: 89% price: 86% performance: 60% features: 60% display: 80% mobility: 60% workmanship: 100% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Android Mag DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/28/2016
Rating: Total score: 89% price: 86% performance: 60% features: 60% display: 80% mobility: 60% workmanship: 100% ergonomy: 80%
Source: WinFuture DE→EN Archive.org version
Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 07/21/2016
Source: WinFuture DE→EN Archive.org version
Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 07/21/2016
Source: Netzwelt DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/15/2016
Rating: Total score: 70% features: 70% mobility: 50% workmanship: 90%
Source: Netzwelt DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/15/2016
Rating: Total score: 70% features: 70% mobility: 50% workmanship: 90%
Source: Android Magazin - Heft 4/2016
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 07/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Android Magazin - Heft 4/2016
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 07/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: PocketPC DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/16/2016
Source: PocketPC DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/16/2016
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/10/2016
Rating: Total score: 77% performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 90%
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/10/2016
Rating: Total score: 77% performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 90%
Source: PocketPC DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/06/2016
Source: PocketPC DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/06/2016
Source: Android Mag DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/03/2016
Source: Android Mag DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/03/2016
Source: Teltarif DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/29/2016
Rating: Total score: 88% features: 90% workmanship: 85% ergonomy: 85%
Source: Teltarif DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/29/2016
Rating: Total score: 88% features: 90% workmanship: 85% ergonomy: 85%
Source: Inside Handy DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/20/2016
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Inside Handy DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/20/2016
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Curved DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/13/2016
Rating: Total score: 74% performance: 62% display: 82% mobility: 73%
Source: Curved DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/13/2016
Rating: Total score: 74% performance: 62% display: 82% mobility: 73%
Source: Smartphone Magazin - Heft 5/2016
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 04/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 89% price: 86%
Source: Smartphone Magazin - Heft 5/2016
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 04/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 89% price: 86%
Source: eTest DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/23/2016
Source: eTest DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/23/2016
Source: Kelisto.es ES→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Premium design; fast fingerprint sensor; good cameras; low price. Negative: No NFC.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/12/2017
Source: Kelisto.es ES→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Premium design; fast fingerprint sensor; good cameras; low price. Negative: No NFC.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/12/2017
Source: DGL.ru RU→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good design. Negative: Mediocre hardware.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/12/2016
Source: DGL.ru RU→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good design. Negative: Mediocre hardware.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/12/2016
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
Specifications
Notebook: ZTE Blade V7 LiteProcessor: Mediatek MT6735
Graphics Adapter: ARM Mali-T720
Display: 5.00 inch, 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixels
Weight: 0.135kg
Price: 169 euro
Links: ZTE homepage
Price comparison
Average Score:
Reviews
Darkness favors secret dealings! ZTE's Blade V7 Lite is an affordable mid-range smartphone with very appealing looks. Compared with its Blade V7 sister model, it is cheaper and aims to attract price-conscious buyers. However, the Lite version is equipped with a somewhat weaker SoC. Furthermore, it presented its dark side in our test.
Source: Trusted Reviews Archive.org version
The ZTE Blade V7 Lite is cheap, but not quite cheerful enough to justify the savings, with poor performance and a sub-par camera.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/20/2016
Rating: Total score: 60% price: 70% performance: 40% display: 60% mobility: 70% workmanship: 60%
Source: Trusted Reviews Archive.org version
The ZTE Blade V7 Lite is cheap, but not quite cheerful enough to justify the savings, with poor performance and a sub-par camera.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/20/2016
Rating: Total score: 60% price: 70% performance: 40% display: 60% mobility: 70% workmanship: 60%
Source: Gear Open Archive.org version
Factor in a chipset which offers thoroughly average performance levels and the Blade V7 Lite begins to look more like its £150/$225 price tag – despite the admittedly gorgeous metal bodywork, which is both svelte and comfortable to hold.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/07/2016
Source: Gear Open Archive.org version
Factor in a chipset which offers thoroughly average performance levels and the Blade V7 Lite begins to look more like its £150/$225 price tag – despite the admittedly gorgeous metal bodywork, which is both svelte and comfortable to hold.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/07/2016
Source: What Mobile Archive.org version
A solid build quality and acceptable camera help this phone to stand out against similar budget handsets, but overall performance can feel slow and sluggish at times. If ZTE had included a slightly better processor, the Blade V7 Lite would’ve made a very attractive package. As it stands, this is just another good budget phone.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/03/2016
Rating: Total score: 72% price: 80% performance: 60% display: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: What Mobile Archive.org version
A solid build quality and acceptable camera help this phone to stand out against similar budget handsets, but overall performance can feel slow and sluggish at times. If ZTE had included a slightly better processor, the Blade V7 Lite would’ve made a very attractive package. As it stands, this is just another good budget phone.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/03/2016
Rating: Total score: 72% price: 80% performance: 60% display: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: Recombu Archive.org version
For less than £10 a month on contract, the Blade V7 Lite does a good job of offering a strong set of features while keeping the cost down. You get a sturdy, attractive Android handset packed with all kinds of gesture controls, plus a solid HD display and a fingerprint sensor for extra security.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/24/2016
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Recombu Archive.org version
For less than £10 a month on contract, the Blade V7 Lite does a good job of offering a strong set of features while keeping the cost down. You get a sturdy, attractive Android handset packed with all kinds of gesture controls, plus a solid HD display and a fingerprint sensor for extra security.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/24/2016
Rating: Total score: 70%
Foreign Reviews
Source: PCtipp.ch DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/31/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: PCtipp.ch DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/31/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: e-media - Heft 09/2016
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 08/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: e-media - Heft 09/2016
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 08/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: WinFuture DE→EN Archive.org version
Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 07/21/2016
Source: WinFuture DE→EN Archive.org version
Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 07/21/2016
Source: Curved DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/13/2016
Rating: Total score: 68% performance: 82% display: 65% mobility: 78%
Source: Curved DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/13/2016
Rating: Total score: 68% performance: 82% display: 65% mobility: 78%
Source: Android Magazin - Heft 4/2016
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 07/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Android Magazin - Heft 4/2016
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 07/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Blick DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/30/2016
Source: Blick DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/30/2016
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/09/2016
Rating: Total score: 58% performance: 40% display: 60% mobility: 50% workmanship: 70%
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/09/2016
Rating: Total score: 58% performance: 40% display: 60% mobility: 50% workmanship: 70%
Source: FAQsAndroid ES→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/14/2017
Rating: Total score: 68% price: 70% display: 65% mobility: 75% workmanship: 70%
Source: FAQsAndroid ES→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/14/2017
Rating: Total score: 68% price: 70% display: 65% mobility: 75% workmanship: 70%
Source: Tuexperto ES→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Low price; excellent speakers; flexible fingerprint sensor; good cameras; nice display. Negative: Mediocre hardware; unsupport fast charge.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/15/2016
Source: Tuexperto ES→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Low price; excellent speakers; flexible fingerprint sensor; good cameras; nice display. Negative: Mediocre hardware; unsupport fast charge.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/15/2016
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/28/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/28/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Chimera Revo IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/22/2016
Rating: Total score: 69% price: 65% features: 65% mobility: 70% workmanship: 75% ergonomy: 75%
Source: Chimera Revo IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/22/2016
Rating: Total score: 69% price: 65% features: 65% mobility: 70% workmanship: 75% ergonomy: 75%
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/04/2016
Rating: Total score: 70% features: 60% display: 70% mobility: 60% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/04/2016
Rating: Total score: 70% features: 60% display: 70% mobility: 60% ergonomy: 80%
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/19/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/19/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Hitek FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/21/2016
Rating: Total score: 68% price: 80% performance: 60% display: 80% mobility: 80%
Source: Hitek FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/21/2016
Rating: Total score: 68% price: 80% performance: 60% display: 80% mobility: 80%
Source: Top for Phone FR→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Nice screen; high autonomy; beautiful design.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/11/2016
Source: Top for Phone FR→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Nice screen; high autonomy; beautiful design.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/11/2016
Source: Teknokulis TR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/07/2016
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 70% workmanship: 75%
Source: Teknokulis TR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/07/2016
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 70% workmanship: 75%
Source: Log.com.tr TR→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good fingerprint reader; decent front cameras; metal case. Negative: Average speakers; thick screen.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 09/06/2016
Source: Log.com.tr TR→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good fingerprint reader; decent front cameras; metal case. Negative: Average speakers; thick screen.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 09/06/2016
Source: Helpix RU→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/21/2017
Rating: Total score: 73%
Source: Helpix RU→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/21/2017
Rating: Total score: 73%
ZTE Blade A610
Specifications
Notebook: ZTE Blade A610Processor: Mediatek MT6735
Graphics Adapter: ARM Mali-T720 MP2
Display: 5.00 inch, 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixels
Weight: 0.14kg
Links: ZTE homepage
Price comparison
Foreign Reviews
Source: Zona Movilidad ES→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; decent cameras; fast fingerprint sensor.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/11/2017
Source: DGL.ru RU→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; long battery life; solid workmanship.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/19/2016
Source: Smartphone.bg BU→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Elegant design; nice display; decent hardware; long battery life.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/14/2017
ZTE Blade V7 Max
Specifications
Notebook: ZTE Blade V7 MaxProcessor: Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 405
Display: 5.50 inch, 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.145kg
Links: ZTE homepage
Price comparison
Average Score:
Reviews
Source: KL Gadget Guy Archive.org version
ZTE has definitely stepped up its game in making decent smartphones, the Blade V7 series have made it to my recommendation list for mid-range smartphones, in this case, the V7 Max is one of the best mid-rangers I've seen this year as it offers a solid build with great performance internals, retailing at RM999, it is a beautiful yet hilarious price tag to make it to the below RM1000 smartphone list, probably the only thing that ZTE really needs to fix is the ugly software experience, if not, just leave it stock and I would be extremely happy to recommend this phone to anyone out there.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/12/2016
Rating: Total score: 78% price: 80% performance: 90% features: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Foreign Reviews
Source: Smartphone e tablet android IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/19/2016
Rating: performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 70%
ZTE Blade A2
Specifications
Notebook: ZTE Blade A2Processor: unknown
Graphics Adapter: ARM Mali-T860 MP2
Display: 5.00 inch, 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixels
Weight: 0.135kg
Links: ZTE homepage
Price comparison
Average Score:
Reviews
Source: Think Digit Archive.org version
The ZTE Blade A2 Plus is pretty much average. It does have long battery life, but is outdone in every department by its competitors. Unlike the Nubia series, this isn't ZTE's best work.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/02/2017
Rating: Total score: 67%
Foreign Reviews
Source: Smartphone e tablet android IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/27/2016
Rating: performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 60% workmanship: 60%
ZTE Blade A610 Plus
Specifications
Notebook: ZTE Blade A610 PlusProcessor: unknown
Graphics Adapter: ARM Mali-T860 MP2
Display: 5.50 inch, 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.189kg
Links: ZTE homepage
Price comparison
Average Score:
Foreign Reviews
Source: Movil Zona ES→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/13/2017
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 70% performance: 70% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 60%
Source: Zona Movilidad ES→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Long battery life; nice display.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/11/2017
Source: Tuexperto ES→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Nice design; good display; long battery life. Negative: Poor cameras.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/28/2017
Source: Media Trends ES→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Stylish design; flexible fingerprint sensor; long battery life.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/27/2017
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/18/2017
Rating: Total score: 65% price: 65% display: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 69%
Source: HDblog.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/07/2017
Rating: Total score: 72%
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/02/2017
Rating: price: 80% features: 80% display: 70% mobility: 100% ergonomy: 80%
Source: 01Net FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/05/2016
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 60% display: 90% mobility: 100%
ZTE Blade V8 Pro
Specifications
Notebook: ZTE Blade V8 ProProcessor: Qualcomm Snapdragon 625
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 506
Display: 5.50 inch, 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.185kg
Price: 400 euro
Links: ZTE homepage
Price comparison
Average Score:
Reviews
Source: Talk Android Archive.org version
When it comes down to it, the ZTE Blade V8 Pro isn’t a bad phone. There’s not too much that makes it stand out from the rest of the crowd, except for the price. On Amazon, you can get all of this for a meager $230 — that’s easily the most impressive part of the phone. For the hardware you’re getting, you really can’t find something similar at that price point, possibly less depending on what other retailers are charging, specials going on or any discounts that might be happening.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/05/2017
Source: Neowin Archive.org version
The Blade V8 Pro is a phone that has a lot of potential. On paper, it offers the perfect package of price and specifications. But, like many things that look good on paper, the Blade V8 Pro just doesn't live up to expectations. Now, I understand this is a $289.98 device, but there are couple things that you just can't get wrong on a smartphone in 2017, and one of those things is the camera. But first the positive.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/07/2017
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: CNet Archive.org version
The ZTE's Blade V8 Pro has long battery life and a budget price, but the Asus ZenFone 3 is simply better.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/04/2017
Rating: Total score: 74% performance: 70% mobility: 90% workmanship: 70%
Source: Greenbot Archive.org version
That said, at $230 there’s going to be some give and take. And for the price, this is a good enough phone for young kids, tweens, and teens. Or simply for someone who doesn’t want too much from a phone.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/15/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: PC World Archive.org version
Beyond the price, there's a lot to like about the Blade V8 Pro. It's unlocked, has microSD support, strong battery life, and performance that doesn’t disappoint.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/15/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Tom's Guide Archive.org version
Right now, the ZTE Blade V8 Pro and the Honor 6X are easily the cream of the budget phone crop, so much so that choosing between the two is difficult. Both phones have bright, 5.5-inch, full-HD screens, along with dual rear cameras and built-in fingerprint readers. They also share the same flaw in that they're shipping with an outdated version of Android.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/13/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Phone Arena Archive.org version
It's not the perfect budget phone, but it hits a whole lot of critical stops on the way to that goal. With another few tweaks here and there, ZTE's next mid-ranger could easily change our expectations for the sort of quality we can hope to get from one very affordable smartphone.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/08/2017
Source: Pocket Lint Archive.org version
These are the first ZTE Blade smartphones to come to the US. The line has been available in Europe, Asia, and Latin America, with more than 50 million Blade phones worldwide. The Blade V8 Pro is available to pre-order now and will begin shipping 11 January.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/09/2017
Source: GSM Arena Archive.org version
As far as CES 2017 is concerned, there's a definite trend that dual cameras are making the headlines. We'll see if users appreciate the added benefit of altering the focus post-shooting. In any case, the competition in this particular segment is a sure way to make dual-cameras something customers would expect in a modern smartphone.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/05/2017
Source: iTech Post Archive.org version
Furthermore, the ZTE Blade V8 Pro is running Android Marshmallow out of the box, which is something extraordinary for a budget phone. In short, we´re talking about a mobile device that has all the characteristics of a flagship killer, and it wouldn't be a huge surprise if it ends up being considered as one of the greatest Chinese smartphones in 2017.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/05/2017
Source: Techradar Archive.org version
ZTE Blade V8 Pro has a lot of the features we've liked about flagship phones, and it offers them at a much cheaper price.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/04/2017
Foreign Reviews
Source: WinFuture DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/06/2017
Source: Smartphone e tablet android IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/28/2017
Rating: performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 70%
ZTE Blade V6 Plus
Specifications
Notebook: ZTE Blade V6 PlusProcessor: Mediatek MT6735
Graphics Adapter: ARM Mali-T720
Display: 5.00 inch, 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixels
Weight: 0.135kg
Links: ZTE homepage
Price comparison
Average Score:
Foreign Reviews
Source: Arturogoga ES→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/19/2017
Rating: Total score: 52% performance: 40% display: 60% mobility: 40% workmanship: 60%
ZTE Blade A510
As smartphones rapidly progress with the integration of VR and AI technology, there is a segment of the market which is still comfortable with a no frills smartphone. The ZTE Blade A510 is one such device. Being no frills nevertheless does not render the ZTE Blade A510 unexceptional. A first impression of this device is that of a good looking and solid smartphone. Its corners are curved with the microphone and speaker at its bottom. The design is also kept minimal. It weighs 130g with its dimensions measuring at 143 x 71.5 x 8.2mm. The back cover is removable yet the battery is non-removable. It is fitted with a 5-inch display (1280x720 pixels at a density of 294 ppi). The scratch resistant screen is also enhanced with S-IPS technology and no air gap. Colours appear clear and it is also adequately bright. It delivers slightly more than its asking price. In terms of its performance, the ZTE Blade A510 is powered by a 64-bit MediaTek MT6735P quad-core processor with 1GB of RAM. Available storage is 8GB (which is pretty limited compared to similar models) and is expandable up to 32GB via a microSD card (again arguably limited). Its specs are far from what is needed for heavy multitasking and gaming. However, given the price and the user base it is targeted for, its low end specs are good enough.
It is fitted with a 13MP rear facing camera with LED Flash and a 5MP front camera. Image quality is average at best and video calls appear sharp and clear. Features on the cameras are standard which includes auto-focus, geo-tagging and panorama. The Blade A510 has dual SIM capability, which means that users can insert two different SIM cards and use them both from one phone (both 3G and 4G connectivity supported). It runs on the latest Android Marshmallow with a tweaked UI that is distinctive to ZTE. Battery life is pretty decent as it comes with a 2,200 mAh Li-Ion battery. Connectivity includes both Bluetooth and WiFi, FM stereo is also built in. It comes in two colour variants, namely grey and blue. Although there is nothing extraordinary with the ZTE Blade A510, it scores well on the fundamentals of a full-fledged smartphone. In fact, there is hardly anything lacking on this phone. Its inexpensive price factor ultimately makes the ZTE Blade A510 a smartphone for the person who just wants it for communicating, running a few social networking apps and some casual internet browsing.
Hands-on article by Jagadisa Rajarathnam
Specifications
Notebook: ZTE Blade A510Processor: Mediatek MT6735P
Graphics Adapter: ARM Mali-T720
Display: 5.00 inch, 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixels
Weight: 0.13kg
Price: 129 euro
Links: ZTE homepage
Price comparison
Reviews
Photo expert in the low-cost sector? The Chinese manufacturer ZTE advertises its latest entry-level smartphone Blade A510 as the absolutely best choice for price-conscious buyers wanting first-rate photos and videos. Find out just how good the rear-facing, 13-MP camera in the low-cost handset really is in our in-depth review.
ZTE Blade A910
Specifications
Notebook: ZTE Blade A910Processor: Mediatek MT6735
Graphics Adapter: ARM Mali-T720
Display: 5.50 inch, 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixels
Weight: 0.135kg
Price: 200 euro
Links: ZTE homepage
Price comparison
Foreign Reviews
Source: WinFuture DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/27/2017
ZTE Blade V8
The ZTE Blade V8 is an affordable new option that packs a fancy dual camera system on the rear side, just like some expensive flagships. Packing a 2 GHz Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 CPU, 3 GB of RAM and 32 GB of storage, the Blade V8 Pro's overall performance compares well to that of its peers. The hardware specification is sufficiently armed for some moderate multitasking. For more storage, the Blade V8 dual SIM card tray has one slot that also doubles as a microSD card reader, capable of adding up to 128 GB of storage. The handset features a metal band around its frame with attractive bevelled edges, 2.5 D curved glass, and a subtly arching back panel. The phone's rear is crafted out of rubberized plastic. This makes the Blade V8 Pro a solid, sturdy and nice looking smartphone. The Blade V8 Pro also features a modern USB Type-C connector on the handsets bottom edge where it sits next to the phone's speaker, and a headphone jack on the top edge. ZTE makes the interesting choice to go with a front-mounted fingerprint scanner, integrated into the home button. The ZTE Blade V8 is thicker, taller, heavier, and just generally feels bulkier. The combination of that Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 chip and the Blade V8 Pro's 3,140 mAh battery adds up to a phone that won't struggle to achieve day-long battery life. Besides that, the ZTE Blade V8 Pro charges really fast with its included fast charger. That huge battery went from zero to full in ninety minutes. The Blade V8 Pro comes with Android 6.0 out of the box, which isn't the most recent version of the Android operating system. However, the implementation is pretty close to stock and does not come with a lot of bloats which is good. ZTE hooks the Blade V8 Pro up with a 5.5-inch screen offering a 1080 x 1920 resolution, a combination which is considered as mid-range display these days. It is big enough to scratch that phablet itch that so inescapably has infiltrated phone design, while also providing a suitably sharp screen. The Blade V8 Pro registered a strong 430 nits of brightness, which is around the 432 nit average for smartphones. The Blade V8 features an 8 MP front camera in front, which delivers solid selfies and two 13 MP shooters in the back. ZTE's camera menu did a good job of highlighting the dual-camera functions by adding an option for Dual next to the standard Photo and Video settings on camera app's mode dial. This immediately calls attention to the camera's extra functionality. When the button is touched, the user can select from one of three options: Bokeh, Monocolor and Monochrome. The latter two options allow the user to take black-and-white photos or photos with selective colours. Bokeh simulates varying depths of field. Hands-on article by Jagadisa RajarathnamSpecifications
Notebook: ZTE Blade V8Processor: Qualcomm Snapdragon 435
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 505
Display: 5.20 inch, 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.142kg
Price: 269 euro
Links: ZTE homepage
Price comparison
Average Score:
Reviews
Big mid-range. The Chinese manufacturer enters the next round in the fight for the low-price crown with the ZTE Blade V8. At a current RRP of 269 Euros (~$291), the new device sounds like a bargain and the technical specifications let the heart beat faster. Read whether this sense of delight can be maintained throughout the test.
Foreign Reviews
Source: Go2 Mobile DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/23/2017
Rating: Total score: 69% price: 80% performance: 70% mobility: 90% workmanship: 90%
Source: Go2 Mobile DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/23/2017
Rating: Total score: 69% price: 80% performance: 70% mobility: 90% workmanship: 90%
Source: Area DVD DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/16/2017
Source: Area DVD DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/16/2017
Source: WinFuture DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/20/2017
Source: WinFuture DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/20/2017
Source: Android Mag DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/04/2017
Rating: Total score: 87% price: 89% performance: 40% features: 60% display: 100% mobility: 40% workmanship: 100% ergonomy: 100%
Source: Android Mag DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/04/2017
Rating: Total score: 87% price: 89% performance: 40% features: 60% display: 100% mobility: 40% workmanship: 100% ergonomy: 100%
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/03/2017
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 50% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/03/2017
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 50% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: Curved DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/20/2017
Rating: Total score: 77% performance: 62% display: 82% mobility: 83%
Source: Curved DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/20/2017
Rating: Total score: 77% performance: 62% display: 82% mobility: 83%
Source: El Androide Libre ES→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/02/2017
Rating: Total score: 68%
Source: El Androide Libre ES→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/02/2017
Rating: Total score: 68%
Source: Computerhoy ES→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/27/2017
Rating: Total score: 75% price: 80% features: 80% display: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Computerhoy ES→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/27/2017
Rating: Total score: 75% price: 80% features: 70% display: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Computerhoy ES→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/27/2017
Rating: Total score: 75% price: 80% features: 80% display: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Computerhoy ES→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/27/2017
Rating: Total score: 75% price: 80% features: 70% display: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Movil Zona ES→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/27/2017
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 70% performance: 70% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 70%
Source: Movil Zona ES→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/27/2017
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 70% performance: 70% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 70%
Source: Zona Movilidad ES→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good cameras; nice display; solid workmanship. Negative: Short battery life.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/04/2017
Source: Zona Movilidad ES→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good cameras; nice display; solid workmanship. Negative: Short battery life.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/04/2017
Source: Tuexperto ES→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good cameras; nice design; lightweight; decent speakers; good price. Negative: No NFC; no USB-C; low autonomy.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/27/2017
Source: Tuexperto ES→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good cameras; nice design; lightweight; decent speakers; good price. Negative: No NFC; no USB-C; low autonomy.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/27/2017
Source: Media Trends ES→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; impressive design.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/27/2017
Source: Media Trends ES→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; impressive design.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/27/2017
Source: Smartphone e tablet android IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/23/2017
Rating: performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 70%
Source: Smartphone e tablet android IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/23/2017
Rating: performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 70%
Source: Top for Phone FR→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Stylish design; nice screen; good display. Negative: High price.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/23/2017
Source: Top for Phone FR→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Stylish design; nice screen; good display. Negative: High price.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/23/2017
Source: Tek.no NO→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/18/2017
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Tek.no NO→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/18/2017
Rating: Total score: 75%
ZTE Blade A2 Plus
Specifications
Notebook: ZTE Blade A2 PlusProcessor: Mediatek MT6750
Graphics Adapter: ARM Mali-T860 MP2
Display: 5.50 inch, 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.189kg
Price: 200 euro
Links: ZTE homepage
Price comparison
Average Score:
Reviews
Source: NDTV Gadgets Archive.org version
It’s definitely not a good all-rounder as Xiaomi’s offering so if you do manage to snag one, we still recommend it over the ZTE. Alternately, you can even look at the Asus ZenFone 3S Max (Review), which we recently tested and found it to be a pretty good smartphone for the price.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/12/2017
Rating: Total score: 60% price: 60% performance: 60% display: 70% mobility: 90% workmanship: 60%
Source: Fone Arena Archive.org version
The ZTE Blade A2 Plus is an average phone that fails to impress in terms of camera performance. The UI on the device is definitely not the best we have seen on phones and needs a major revamp. Although the price tag of Rs. 11,999 looks decent, the phone falls short to justify it. However, one area where the Blade A2 Plus scores is the battery performance and I am not sure how many customers would go for the device only because of the large 5000mAh battery. It is available exclusively from Flipkart. Check out this list if you are looking for smartphones with long battery life.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/07/2017
Source: iTech Post Archive.org version
The problem with many budget smartphone these days is that it struggles with battery life. But what if I told you that there is a $179 smartphone that could easily last for two days? Well, if you're interested, then the ZTE Blade A2 Plus is probably the best budget smartphone that you are looking for.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/08/2017
Source: The Mobile Indian Archive.org version
For the initial verdict, apart from the 5000 mAh battery, ZTE Blade A2 Plus plays it too safe to move the market. We already have smartphones with enough battery life, better processor, better camera and with a similar design. Priced at Rs 11,999, the Blade A2 Plus will find it hard to stand out in the crowd.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/03/2017
Source: Tech2.in.com Archive.org version
ZTE Blade A2 Plus is a strictly average smartphone by the company. But despite the decent attempt at going with tried and tested way with a good battery life, there is no way that I would recommend this smartphone to people despite the decent price point of Rs 11,999. There are much better smartphones in the market at the same price point offering a much better value for money. The best option right now for budget buyers should be the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4. In fact, the Xiaomi Redmi 3S Prime also outperforms ZTE Blade A2 Plus in performance. Other options that you may look at is Moto G4 Plus which is priced a little higher.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/03/2017
Rating: Total score: 60% performance: 60% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Foreign Reviews
Source: Smartphone e tablet android IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/24/2017
Rating: performance: 70% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
ZTE Blade Velocity
Specifications
Notebook: ZTE Blade VelocityProcessor: Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 405
Display: 5.20 inch, 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.145kg
Price: 200 euro
Links: ZTE homepage
Price comparison
Average Score:
Reviews
Source: V3.co.uk Archive.org version
While there's not much to get excited about here, the Blade Velocity actually offers more than you might expect for its bargain-basement price. It feels like an own-brand smartphone - you don't get the pretty design or fun features of the pricier models, but you don't pay for the brand name either.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/25/2017
Rating: Total score: 60%
ZTE Blade V7 Plus
Specifications
Notebook: ZTE Blade V7 PlusProcessor: Mediatek MT6753
Graphics Adapter: ARM Mali-T720 MP4
Display: 5.20 inch, 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.143kg
Price: 300 euro
Links: ZTE homepage
Price comparison
Average Score:
Reviews
Source: Ausdroid Archive.org version
The ZTE Blade V7 Plus is priced in the low end range and performs very well for a $290 phone. The hardware is great quality and the software is decent without being intrusive or covered in bells and whistles that you’ll never use. While the processor/RAM combination is a tad slow at times it is not like you spend a multitude of seconds waiting for it to stop hanging up. Not once did I experience a hang up, so although the apps took a fraction of a second longer to open than usual they still opened in a reasonable amount of time.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/20/2017
Rating: Total score: 76% price: 90% mobility: 69%
Foreign Reviews
Source: Smartphone e tablet android IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/31/2017
Rating: performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 70%
ZTE Blade V8 Lite
Specifications
Notebook: ZTE Blade V8 LiteProcessor: Mediatek MT6750
Graphics Adapter: ARM Mali-T860 MP2
Display: 5.00 inch, 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixels
Weight: 0.141kg
Links: ZTE homepage
Price comparison
Average Score:
Foreign Reviews
Source: Android Mag DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/30/2017
Rating: Total score: 84% price: 92% performance: 40% features: 60% display: 60% mobility: 40% workmanship: 100% ergonomy: 100%
Source: Product Test RU→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Nice design; metal case. Negative: Short battery life; weak hardware.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/03/2017
ZTE Blade V8 Mini
The ZTE Blade V8 Mini offers one of the cheapest ways to upgrade to the newer version of Google's operating system and walk away with a dual-lens camera. The ultra-affordable Android 7.0 Nougat smartphone is the lighter variant of the ZTE Blade V8 Pro revealed at CES 2017. The ZTE Blade V8 Mini does not have the most powerful specs, of course, but many casual phone owners want a fancy camera. The ZTE Blade V8 Mini has a 5-inch HD screen, meaning it is at the lower 720p resolution. It is more powerful than the ZTE Blade V8 Lite, but it lacks in pixel count. Brightness and viewing angles were respectable. It delivers slightly fuzzy text when a user gets right up close to the screen, but it gets the job done. It has a one-hand friendly design at 143.5 x 70 x 8.9 mm in a metallic body, which was surprising. It does not feel like a very cheap phone. There is a circular fingerprint sensor pad on the back and mini USB port on the bottom, and the users get a headphone jack on this phone. The fingerprint sensor’s 360-degree finger scan enables touch access in 0.3 seconds. The ZTE Blade V8 Mini's big highlight is the dual-lens camera consisting of a 13 MP and 2 MP sensor. Users can refocus photos, which is something the new iPhone can not do, and the Blade Mini camera supports 3D shooting to generate 3D photos. With the depth and distance information, the Blade V8 Mini can make the effect of the pictures as similar as taken by bokeh of SLR camera or even flagships like the iPhone 8 Plus and iPhone X. On the front, it has a 5 MP camera with Beauty mode. As for hardware specification, it has the Qualcomm 435 chipset, 2 GB of RAM and 16 GB of internal storage and a microSD card slot. The phone is not meant for serious gaming, but it is enough for most everything else. It felt speedy enough for an entry-level handset. ZTE added a custom skin onto Android 7, which kind of takes the sheen off having a cheap phone running Android. It is still as different and divisive as it was on Marshmallow. Hence, Google purists are not going to have a good time. While the battery is not removable, it has a capacity of 2,800 mAh, which is a pretty decent size, given the money. What should help out is the fact that it runs Android 7.0 Nougat, which contains a bunch of battery-saving tricks like Doze Mode 2.0. The battery is charged by a microUSB port on the bottom; not USB-C yet. Other sensors built into the smartphone includes a Proximity sensor, an accelerometer, a compass, and a gyroscope. Hands-on article by Jagadisa RajarathnamSpecifications
Notebook: ZTE Blade V8 MiniProcessor: Qualcomm Snapdragon 435
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 505
Display: 5.00 inch, 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixels
Weight: 0.149kg
Price: 179 euro
Links: ZTE homepage
Price comparison
Reviews
An inexpensive smartphone with a dual camera. ZTE is expanding their lower mid-range product line. Alongside the ZTE Blade V8 64 GB, the Chinese smartphone manufacturer has now introduced the ZTE Blade V8 Mini to the mobile market. The ZTE Blade V8's smaller sibling costs only 179 Euros (~$215, recommended retail price; not yet available on the American market). It is equipped with a dual camera, a fingerprint scanner and Android 7.0.
Source: Stuff TV Archive.org version
Otherwise the Blade V8 Mini looks like a fairly tidy budget handset. Sure, it's got more than a few tweaks and changes, courtesy of a custom skin, but underneath you're getting Google's latest and greatest OS.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/27/2017
Source: Stuff TV Archive.org version
Otherwise the Blade V8 Mini looks like a fairly tidy budget handset. Sure, it's got more than a few tweaks and changes, courtesy of a custom skin, but underneath you're getting Google's latest and greatest OS.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/27/2017
Foreign Reviews
Source: Area DVD DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/29/2017
Source: Area DVD DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/29/2017
Source: Curved DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/01/2017
Source: Curved DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/01/2017
Source: Media Trends ES→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; compact size; nice design.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/16/2017
Source: Media Trends ES→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; compact size; nice design.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/16/2017
Source: Product Test RU→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Compact size; good dual cameras; powerful processor; fast fingerprint sensor. Negative: Sim and microSD are on the same slot.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/04/2017
Source: Product Test RU→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Compact size; good dual cameras; powerful processor; fast fingerprint sensor. Negative: Sim and microSD are on the same slot.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/04/2017
ZTE Blade L5
Specifications
Notebook: ZTE Blade L5Processor: Mediatek MT6572
Graphics Adapter: ARM Mali-400 MP
Display: 5.00 inch, 16:9, 854 x 480 pixels
Weight: 0.17kg
Price: 100 euro
Links: ZTE homepage
Price comparison
Foreign Reviews
Source: Tech Stage DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/30/2017
ZTE Blade A520
Specifications
Notebook: ZTE Blade A520Processor: Mediatek MT6737
Graphics Adapter: ARM Mali-T720 MP2
Display: 5.00 inch, 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixels
Weight: 0.13kg
Links: ZTE homepage
Price comparison
Foreign Reviews
Source: Smartphone e tablet android IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/19/2017
Rating: performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 70%
ZTE Blade X Max
Specifications
Notebook: ZTE Blade X MaxProcessor: Qualcomm Snapdragon 435
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 505
Display: 6.00 inch, 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.196kg
Price: 200 euro
Links: ZTE homepage
Price comparison
Average Score:
Reviews
Source: PC Mag Archive.org version
For $150, the ZTE Blade X Max offers great value for the price. You get solid overall performance, a big, bright 1080p screen, the latest Android software, and a fingerprint sensor. We like it just a smidge more than the Max 2, but if you really want dual-band Wi-Fi or a slightly faster processor, that phone remains a strong option. The LG Stylo 3 is another alternative worth considering if you like to take a lot of notes, thanks to its useful built-in stylus, but it costs $20 more and has a lower-resolution display. That makes the ZTE Blade X Max your best overall bet, and our Editors' Choice on Cricket.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/08/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
ZTE Blade Z Max
Specifications
Notebook: ZTE Blade Z MaxProcessor: Qualcomm Snapdragon 435
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 505
Display: 6.00 inch, 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.175kg
Price: 200 euro
Links: ZTE homepage
Price comparison
Average Score:
Reviews
Source: Android Authority Archive.org version
The ZTE Blade Z Max brings a lot to the table with its dual camera setup, fingerprint scanner, large display, and even larger battery. The only small thing about this device is its price point. While initially launched at a very affordable $130, the device is currently available from MetroPCS for just $99!
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/05/2017
Rating: Total score: 77% performance: 70% display: 85% mobility: 87% workmanship: 70%
Source: Tom's Guide Archive.org version
Mark 2017 down as the year that premium phones started to cost more than tablets and laptops. But it will also be the year that phones under $200 finally started to deliver. The Blade Z Max is one of the best of the bunch.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/28/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: PC Mag Archive.org version
Although it certainly isn't competition for higher-end handsets, the ZTE Blade Z Max is a midrange powerhouse in the MetroPCS lineup. For $129 you get a big screen and battery, along with capable performance and a dual-camera setup that provides capabilities usually only found in more expensive devices. It's a great deal for the price, and a worthy successor to the ZMax Pro. If you're looking for something smaller, the Moto E4 is available for the same price and offers a similar level of performance. But for everyone who loves a big screen, the Blade Z Max is our Editors' Choice.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/28/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Android Guys Archive.org version
I feel like it’s utterly redundant of me to say that this phone is an amazing value if you’re on the Metro network, or if you can buy it at retail and unlock it for use on T-Mobile or AT&T. At $130, that’s certainly an option. The Blade Z Max, as mentioned above, is a tremendous value phone for people that don’t need a workhorse phone.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/28/2017
Rating: Total score: 84% price: 100% display: 80% mobility: 100% workmanship: 70%
Source: PC Mag Archive.org version
The ZTE Blade Z Max looks to be a real contender in the MetroPCS lineup. For $129 you get a big screen and battery, along with capable performance and a dual rear camera setup. We plan to evaluate more of the Z Max's capabilities ahead of the phone's release on August 28, so check back then for a full review and rating.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/14/2017
ZTE Blade V9
Specifications
Notebook: ZTE Blade V9Processor: Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 450
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 506
Display: 5.70 inch, 2:1, 2160 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.153kg
Price: 269 euro
Links: ZTE homepage
Price comparison
Average Score:
Reviews
Are we wandering in the dark? ZTE promises buyers of the Blade V9 better photos in bad lighting. We were not quite convinced by the low-light feature. In this review, we want to clarify whether or not the Blade V9's night shots are still better than those of other smartphones.
Source: Techradar Archive.org version
The Blade V9 is designed to attract those with a taste for premium tech. With a stack of features, and impressive design both in and out, this is one to watch out for.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/25/2018
Source: Android Authority Archive.org version
Do either of these phones sound appealing to you? ZTE has definitely stepped up their build-quality since the last Blade, so it’s good to see consistent improvement.
Comparison, online available, Short, Date: 02/25/2018
Source: Techradar Archive.org version
The Blade V9 is designed to attract those with a taste for premium tech. With a stack of features, and impressive design both in and out, this is one to watch out for.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/25/2018
Source: Android Authority Archive.org version
Do either of these phones sound appealing to you? ZTE has definitely stepped up their build-quality since the last Blade, so it’s good to see consistent improvement.
Comparison, online available, Short, Date: 02/25/2018
Foreign Reviews
Source: Area DVD DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/23/2018
Source: Area DVD DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/23/2018
Source: Chip.de DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/04/2018
Rating: Total score: 83% performance: 79% features: 79% display: 92% mobility: 85%
Source: Chip.de DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/04/2018
Rating: Total score: 83% performance: 79% features: 79% display: 92% mobility: 85%
Source: Android Mag DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/27/2018
Source: Android Mag DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/27/2018
Source: Netzwelt DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/12/2018
Rating: Total score: 80% features: 90% mobility: 60% workmanship: 90%
Source: Netzwelt DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/12/2018
Rating: Total score: 80% features: 90% mobility: 60% workmanship: 90%
Source: Android Pit DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/05/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Android Pit DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/05/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Tech Stage DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/28/2018
Source: Tech Stage DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/28/2018
Source: Allround-PC.com DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/19/2018
Source: Allround-PC.com DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/19/2018
Source: Android Pit DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/25/2018
Source: Curved DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/25/2018
Source: Android Pit DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/25/2018
Source: Curved DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/25/2018
Source: Movil Zona ES→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/21/2018
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 70% performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: Movil Zona ES→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/21/2018
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 70% performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Attractive design; good price.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/25/2018
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Attractive design; good price.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/25/2018
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/17/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/17/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Top for Phone FR→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Nice display; great built quality; long battery life. Negative: No USB-C; classic design.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/12/2018
Source: Top for Phone FR→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Nice display; great built quality; long battery life. Negative: No USB-C; classic design.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/12/2018
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Attractive design; good price.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/25/2018
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Attractive design; good price.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/25/2018
Source: Mega Obzor RU→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Elegant design; high performance; excellent display; powerful processor; nice cameras. Negative: Only microUSB; slow charging.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/07/2018
Source: Mega Obzor RU→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Elegant design; high performance; excellent display; powerful processor; nice cameras. Negative: Only microUSB; slow charging.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/07/2018
Source: Zoom RU→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; nice performance; decent hardware.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/18/2018
Source: Zoom RU→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; nice performance; decent hardware.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/18/2018
Source: Ferra.ru RU→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Impressive design; nice display; good price.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/01/2018
Source: Ferra.ru RU→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Impressive design; nice display; good price.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/01/2018
Source: Product Test RU→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; nice dual cameras; good display; large screen; support NFC.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/23/2018
Source: Product Test RU→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; nice dual cameras; good display; large screen; support NFC.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/23/2018
ZTE Blade V9 Vita
Specifications
Notebook: ZTE Blade V9 VitaProcessor: Qualcomm Snapdragon 435
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 505
Display: 5.45 inch, 18:9, 2160 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.118kg
Price: 200 euro
Links: ZTE homepage
Price comparison
Average Score:
Reviews
Source: Techradar Archive.org version
The Blade V9 Vita may be the cheapest way to upgrade to an all-screen phone thanks to its bezel-reduced 5.5-inch display. It's the lite version of the ZTE Blade V9 with a more compact size and budget specs to match, just in case you want today's tall screen look with yesterday's entry-level performance.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/26/2018
Source: Android Authority Archive.org version
Do either of these phones sound appealing to you? ZTE has definitely stepped up their build-quality since the last Blade, so it’s good to see consistent improvement.
Comparison, online available, Short, Date: 02/25/2018
Foreign Reviews
Source: Android Pit DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/01/2018
Source: Arturogoga ES→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; high autonomy.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/07/2019
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; nice design; great built quality.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/03/2018
Source: Helpix RU→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/18/2020
Rating: Total score: 100%
ZTE Blade Max View
Specifications
Notebook: ZTE Blade Max ViewProcessor: Qualcomm Snapdragon 435
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 505
Display: 6.00 inch, 18:9, 2160 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.16kg
Price: 200 euro
Links: ZTE homepage
Price comparison
Average Score:
Reviews
Source: Tom's Guide Archive.org version
The Blade Max View does have the benefit of being quite cheap upon launch. But its rivals have fallen in price as well, and all things considered, we still find the Moto G6 and the Nokia 6.1 to offer more well-rounded experiences, with considerably more up-to-date software and a level of quality that is likely to last you a few years longer, too. That leaves ZTE's comeback feeling like a somewhat compelling alternative, though well short of a leader in its class.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/18/2019
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Android Guys Archive.org version
The Blade Max View can be purchased for $170 through ZTE’s website as part of what appears to be a limited time promotion. That’s a great price point and we’d like to see it stick around. At this cost it goes from being just another device to consider to something more appealing and even borders on a “steal”.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/13/2018
Source: Android Guys Archive.org version
The Blade Max View can be purchased for $170 through ZTE’s website as part of what appears to be a limited time promotion. That’s a great price point and we’d like to see it stick around. At this cost it goes from being just another device to consider to something more appealing and even borders on a “steal”.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/13/2018
Source: Phone Scoop Archive.org version
ZTE is looking to the Blade Max View, an inexpensive Android phone with a huge screen and a massive battery, to help it regain its place in the U.S. market. The phone follows ZTE's mantra of offering affordable devices with good performance, but the Blade Max View is held back by a few core features. Is is worth taking another look at ZTE? Find out in Phone Scoop's in-depth report.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 12/03/2018
Source: Ubergizmo English Archive.org version
We know that ZTE is a good performer in the Low mid-range market segment for smartphones and in that sense the Blade Max View delivers very good performance for the price range ($199.99). The experience will be complete by December with the expected Android Oreo update.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/05/2018
Foreign Reviews
Source: Tom's Hardware DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/27/2019
Rating: Total score: 60%
ZTE Blade Max 2s
Specifications
Notebook: ZTE Blade Max 2sProcessor: Qualcomm Snapdragon 435
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 505
Display: 6.00 inch, 18:9, 2160 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.18kg
Price: 200 euro
Links: ZTE homepage
Price comparison
Reviews
Source: Android Guys Archive.org version
The Blade Max 2S can be purchased for $180 through ZTE’s website — a reasonably set price point. Can we recommend it? Yes… we do, but we’d love it at $150. We’re far more fond of the Moto G6 Play at its current price and we imagine US consumers would trust that brand more, too.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/19/2019
ZTE Blade V10
Need a cheap, affordable smartphone that comes easy and handy? The ZTE Blade V10 is one of the available choices that users can scour for in the market. The ZTE Blade V10 does not lack in terms of style and has a few simple key features that can be operated with nary a fuss. First and foremost, it is to be brought into immediate attention that the physical structure of the ZTE Blade V10 is constructed through a multi-layer stacking process to create an almost surreal-looking porcelain appearance on its body. Not only that, the ZTE Blade V10 also traces a ceramic feeling to the touch, as if one is handling a delicate slab of ceramic rather than a smartphone in their hand. The combination of both modern technology and the artistic theme of surrealism of this smartphone design has somehow established a sweet position in the expression of creative freedom. The ZTE Blade V10 is available in three colors – classic black, turquoise blue, and a deep blue shade, which has been cleverly brushed with a fading purple-colored gradient edging towards the bottom of the device. The ZTE Blade V10 has a 6.3-inch full density screen which expands close to its curved edges. The 90.3% screen ratio enables users to gaze into their smartphone with a 400 PPI broader view for a more immersive experience in general. The ZTE Blade V10 does have a mandatory fingerprint sensor as a privacy and security measure but there is not much else to gawk about aside from its camera feature. A smartphone would not be complete without a defining camera feature. The ZTE Blade V10 is no less a contender in that regard despite coming off as a meek representation of a budget smartphone. Selfie lovers will be enlightened to learn that the ZTE Blade V10 is well-equipped with a 32 MP photosensitive front camera with f/2.0 large aperture. The front camera is enhanced with several other features such as AI selfie and also an outstanding new generation four-in-one technology which effectively increases the camera’s unit pixel in order to produce a better photo resolution. The four-in-one technology introduces low-light shooting onto the table and pictures are claimed to be more breathtaking if taken in a dark environment. On top of that, selfie lovers are going to be delighted that the ZTE Blade V10 is incorporated with AI beauty technology, which accentuates its user’s facial features from selecting the best solution from a million beauty programs. Combined with backlight HDR from negatively affecting the outcome of the picture, the portrait effect is bound to bring more focus to the user rather than the distractions that exist around the environment. Bokeh effect cleverly comes in handy should one feels the need to blur things out in the background. Hands-on article by Jagadisa RajarathnamSpecifications
Notebook: ZTE Blade V10Processor: Mediatek Mediatek Helio P70
Graphics Adapter: ARM Mali-G72 MP3
Display: 6.30 inch, 19:9, 2280 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.156kg
Price: 250 euro
Links: ZTE homepage
Price comparison
Average Score:
Reviews
The Blade V10 replaces the Blade V9. ZTE has decided to build on the predecessor's strengths and is offering a lot of features for an affordable price. And it is not only the 32-MP front camera that looks promising. We will take a look at what potential buyers can expect from this affordable mid-range device in our review.
Foreign Reviews
Source: Tech.de DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/20/2019
Rating: Total score: 86%
Source: Tech.de DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/20/2019
Rating: Total score: 86%
Source: Android User DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/19/2019
Source: Android User DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/19/2019
Source: WinFuture DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/10/2019
Source: WinFuture DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/10/2019
Source: Der Standard DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/01/2019
Source: Der Standard DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/01/2019
Source: MobiFlip DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/01/2019
Rating: Total score: 76%
Source: MobiFlip DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/01/2019
Rating: Total score: 76%
Source: Mega Obzor RU→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Nice display; decent processor; great cameras; NFC.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/31/2019
Source: Mega Obzor RU→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Nice display; decent processor; great cameras; NFC.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/31/2019
Source: Ferra.ru RU→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Great cameras; good price; decent hardware.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/04/2019
Source: Ferra.ru RU→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Great cameras; good price; decent hardware.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/04/2019
Source: Hi-Tech Mail RU→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; nice cameras; long battery life.
Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 05/20/2019
Source: Hi-Tech Mail RU→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; nice cameras; long battery life.
Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 05/20/2019
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
The Blade family series hailing from the ZTE brand has long made itself known as a line of affordable but competent budget smartphones. The release of the Blade V10 Vita serves as an augmented version of the initial Blade V10 model for those who are able to cash in a few extra bucks in order to secure a mobile device with more ample features in their hands. First and foremost, let us talk about the physical design of the smartphone. In terms of comparison, the ZTE Blade V10 Vita does not differ much compared to the frame structure of the original Blade V10. It is to be noted, however, that the Vita version of the Blade V10 adopts a brand new water-drop screen across a horizontal 6.26 inches display. The frontal screen design of the Blade V10 Vita works in tandem with the device’s biometric face identification technology. The algorithm programmed inside of the smartphone is capable of tracing real facial features with much precision and perform accurate face-matching to achieve both live face unlocking and raise to wake in one single step. The ZTE Blade V10 Vita is believed to be packed with considerable high-end micro-architecture despite living its name and legacy as a budget smartphone. To start, the ZTE Blade V10 Vita operates using an octa-core (Cortex-A55) processor with a consistent frequency up to 1.6 GHz. This entails that even for a smartphone to be bought on a dime, the ZTE Blade V10 Vita is more than capable of delivering great performance in spite of its affordable pricing. The octa-core Cortex-A55 processor is said to be capable of addressing a wide range of applications with diverging cost. The comprehensiveness of the processor’s AI performance harbors a direct correlation towards a smoother overall performance for ZTE Blade V10 Vita. The rear side of the Blade V10 Vita has a dual camera, which undoubtedly requires further elaboration. The dual camera in question is better known as the 13 MP AI Dual camera. The 13 MP AI Dual camera comes with certain technical features which can be eventually explored and learned even for new smartphone users. The dual rear camera supports the professional background out-of-focus effect made traceable by what ZTE terms as an intelligent AI system as well as an advanced beauty algorithm for immediate visual enhancements. Essentially, this applies some sort of a filter to the facial details to smoothen and touch-up parts of it. In addition, the aforementioned camera AI does not only administer bokeh effect on an automatic basis; it is also capable of recognizing scenic backgrounds and thus react accordingly to the external environmental factors in order to produce the best snapshot that the ZTE Blade V10 Vita has to offer. Hands-on article by Jagadisa RajarathnamSpecifications
Notebook: ZTE Blade V10 VitaProcessor: SC9863A
Graphics Adapter: PowerVR GE8322 / IMG8322
Display: 6.26 inch, 19:9, 1520 x 720 pixels
Weight: 0.153kg
Price: 179 euro
Links: ZTE homepage
Price comparison
Reviews
The smaller sibling of the Blade V10 is priced significantly below 180 Euros (~$203), offers a large display, good storage equipment, and the current Android 9.0 Pie, but makes some compromises in terms of the camera.
Foreign Reviews
Source: Hi-Tech Mail RU→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; nice cameras; long battery life.
Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 05/20/2019
Source: Hi-Tech Mail RU→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; nice cameras; long battery life.
Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 05/20/2019
ZTE Blade 20 Smart
Specifications
Notebook: ZTE Blade 20 SmartProcessor: Mediatek Mediatek Helio P60
Graphics Adapter: ARM Mali-G72 MP3
Display: 6.49 inch, 19.5:9, 1560 x 720 pixels
Weight: 0.19kg
Links: ZTE homepage
Price comparison
Foreign Reviews
Source: Yamobi RU→EN
Positive: Bright display; long battery life; NFC module; good hardware; nice cameras; low price. Negative: Slow charging; combined slot.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/25/2021
Source: DGL.ru RU→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Nice cameras; decent performance; long battery life; modern design; great built quality.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/25/2020
Source: i2Hard RU→EN Archive.org version
Positive: High performance; no NFC; high autonomy. Negative: Mediocre case.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/08/2020
Source: DGL.ru RU→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Nice cameras; decent hardware; NFC chip; LED notification; USB-C. Negative: Plastic case; combined slot.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/27/2020
ZTE Blade 10 Prime
Specifications
Notebook: ZTE Blade 10 PrimeProcessor: Mediatek Mediatek Helio P60
Graphics Adapter: ARM Mali-G72 MP3
Display: 6.30 inch, 19:9, 2280 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.165kg
Price: 200 euro
Links: ZTE homepage
Price comparison
Average Score:
Reviews
Source: PC Mag Archive.org version
The ZTE Blade 10 Prime for Visible offers a gorgeous display, snappy performance, and a smooth software experience for under $200.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/31/2020
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Phandroid Archive.org version
The ZTE Blade 10 Prime delivers in a lot of areas with solid photo quality, respectable performance, and a great looking display. Battery life is unquestionably my biggest complaint with the slow camera launch coming in second. With those caveats in mind, if you need or want to stay below spending $200 on your smartphone the Blade 10 Prime is an excellent value.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/24/2020
Source: Tom's Guide Archive.org version
If you're determined to pay less than $200 for a new smartphone, you're going to have to make some compromises. The ZTE Blade 10 Prime is a reminder of that. For everything ZTE's phone gets right — the respectable performance and solid image quality, first and foremost — it gets hung up in other areas, like with its short battery life and a display that's so dim, it can be hard to see outdoors.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/17/2019
Rating: Total score: 70%
ZTE Blade V2020
Specifications
Notebook: ZTE Blade V2020Processor: Mediatek Mediatek Helio P70
Graphics Adapter: ARM Mali-G72 MP3
Display: 6.53 inch, 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.185kg
Price: 280 euro
Links: ZTE homepage
Price comparison
Average Score:
Reviews
ZTE places the Blade V2020 in the price range between 200 and 300 Euros (~$236 and ~$354). The installed hardware is powerful but is outperformed by the competition. Our review clarifies whether a purchase is still worth it.
Foreign Reviews
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/16/2020
Rating: Total score: 78% performance: 75% display: 80% mobility: 75% workmanship: 80%
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/16/2020
Rating: Total score: 78% performance: 75% display: 80% mobility: 75% workmanship: 80%
Source: Yamobi RU→EN
Positive: Stylish design; great built quality; nice display; NFC module; good cameras. Negative: Bulky; slow charging; combined slot.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/15/2021
Source: Yamobi RU→EN
Positive: Stylish design; great built quality; nice display; NFC module; good cameras. Negative: Bulky; slow charging; combined slot.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/15/2021
Source: Mega Obzor RU→EN Archive.org version
Positive: NFC module; thin frames; nice design; impressive fingerprint sensor; elegant design. Negative: Many bloatwares.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/27/2020
Source: Mega Obzor RU→EN Archive.org version
Positive: NFC module; thin frames; nice design; impressive fingerprint sensor; elegant design. Negative: Many bloatwares.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/27/2020
Source: DGL.ru RU→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Modern design; great built quality. Negative: Poor cameras; slow system; short battery life.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/25/2020
Source: DGL.ru RU→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Modern design; great built quality. Negative: Poor cameras; slow system; short battery life.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/25/2020
ZTE Blade X1 5G
Specifications
Notebook: ZTE Blade X1 5GProcessor: Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 765G
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 620
Display: 6.50 inch, 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.19kg
Price: 400 euro
Links: ZTE homepage
Price comparison
Average Score:
Reviews
Source: Android Authority
If you’re on a budget and itching to try Verizon’s Visible service, this is the way to do it. However, there’s no good way to get your hands on a ZTE Blade X1 with any other carrier in the US. That’s a shame because the ZTE Blade X1 is more than competitive when it comes to the camera, processor, and RAM with many phones in its price tier. Where the Blade X1 comes up well short is the software. It’s not good enough to have a device running on an outdated security patch for more than a year and the lack of a long-term promise for platform upgrades is far behind rivals from Samsung and Google. We’ve already mentioned the closest alternatives to the Blade X1 in the Pixel 5a ($449), Galaxy A52 5G ($499), and OnePlus Nord N200 ($239). The former two hold more value and power for your money, while the Nord N200 is a cheaper entry into 5G, albeit with a similarly questionable software situation.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/09/2021
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Phandroid
But the real question is whether you should buy the Blade X1 5G. If you’re looking to switch to Visible (or Yahoo Mobile) and definitely want 5G, then this is more than enough of a phone to handle anything you need. The phone is snappy, has a solid quad-camera system, and is extremely comfortable in the hand. Our biggest complaint comes down to the lack of software updates, which we are hoping to see the company improve upon in the very near future.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/27/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
ZTE Blade 11 Prime
Specifications
Notebook: ZTE Blade 11 PrimeProcessor: Mediatek Helio 20 Helio P22 MT6762
Graphics Adapter: Imagination PowerVR GE8320
Display: 6.52 inch, 20:9, 1600 x 720 pixels
Weight: 0.19kg
Price: 180 euro
Links: ZTE homepage
Price comparison
Average Score:
Reviews
Source: Talk Android
There’s a lot to like, especially if you’re primarily using your phone for gaming or watching videos. If you’re big into taking photos or social media, however, it’s just not a pleasant experience. That processor really puts a black eye on the package, even without any additional software fluff from ZTE. You can completely count out any kind of productivity work. If you fit the bill, however, you can get a phone with a pretty good, very large screen with wireless charging for less than a couple hundred bucks, and that’s nuts. If ZTE can tweak this just a bit for the next iteration, they’re going to have a budget-friendly king on their hands.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/31/2021
Source: The Verge
This year’s Motorola Moto G Power would be a worthwhile alternative if you can spend a little more; you’ll get a faster processor and better battery life, though you should definitely plan on buying a microSD card to supplement its meager 32GB of storage. The G Play is a good alternative, too, even with a processor that’s a bit slower than the G Power’s.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/08/2021
Rating: Total score: 55%
ZTE Blade L210
Specifications
Notebook: ZTE Blade L210Processor: Spreadtrum SC7731
Graphics Adapter: ARM Mali-400 MP2
Display: 6.00 inch, 18:9, 960 x 480 pixels
Weight: 0.165kg
Price: 100 euro
Links: ZTE homepage
Price comparison
Foreign Reviews
Source: Mega Obzor RU→EN
Positive: Good price. Negative: Poor display; low performance; weak connectivity.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/25/2021
ZTE Blade V30 Vita
Specifications
Notebook: ZTE Blade V30 VitaProcessor: unknown
Graphics Adapter: unknown
Display: 6.82 inch, 20.5:9, 1640 x 720 pixels
Weight: 0.21kg
Links: ZTE homepage
Price comparison
Average Score:
Reviews
Source: OI Spice Tech News
The ZTE Blade V30 Vita smartphone is built for the entry-level segment and does not offer high-end specs. You’re getting a larger display phone with a flashy triple camera setup design and long battery life. With this combo, you will get the user’s attention. But at the same time, the phone’s main selling point would be its camera and a huge battery. However, the competition has always been tough on budget phones. In the end, if you’re looking for a smartphone for general uses the Blade V30 Vita is a great deal. If the device is not available in your country, you can also check out the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 as an alternative with almost similar specs and features.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/29/2021
Source: Technobig
A smartphone for those who are not looking for something special and outstanding in devices, but are on a budget and want not the simplest, but at the same time convenient phone. In the ZTE Blade V30 Vita, we get decent autonomy, a tolerable camera, and nice bonuses like NFC or an interface without overloaded elements.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/06/2021
Foreign Reviews
Source: Tech Stage DE→EN
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/13/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Chip Online TR TR→EN
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/14/2022
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: i2Hard RU→EN
Positive: Excellent autonomy; good screen; nice design. Negative: Combined slot.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/02/2022
Source: Yamobi RU→EN
Positive: Stylish design; good display; NFC module; support Google services. Negative: Very bulky; slow charging; weak hardware; low performance; combined slot.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/26/2021
ZTE Blade V30
Specifications
Notebook: ZTE Blade V30Processor: T618
Graphics Adapter: ARM Mali-G52 MP2
Display: 6.67 inch, 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.193kg
Price: 200 euro
Links: ZTE homepage
Price comparison
Reviews
Source: OI Spice Tech News
The ZTE Blade V30 is an entry-level phone so you will not get a 5G smartphone. As the battery is powerful, the cameras are well developed and the FHD screen catches your eye, this phone definitely not going to disappoint you. When it comes to gaming or judging the phone’s performance, you might be disappointed as the chipset is an entry-level addition. If you look for alternatives, you will get many phones in this budget range with advanced features.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/18/2021
Foreign Reviews
Source: Yamobi RU→EN
Positive: Stylish design; great built quality; nice display; NFC module; good cameras; suppport Google services. Negative: Bulky; slow charging; average performance; combined slot.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/24/2021
ZTE Blade L9
Specifications
Notebook: ZTE Blade L9Processor: unknown
Graphics Adapter: ARM Mali-400 MP2
Display: 5.00 inch, 18:9, 960 x 480 pixels
Weight: 0.143kg
Links: ZTE homepage
Price comparison
Reviews
Source: OI Spice Tech News
ZTE Blade L9 is released in Mexico on 10th October 2021, where the expected price would be roughly $80 (Rs 5,999). The phone is the successor of the Blade L8, and it offers almost similar specs. The Blade L9 smartphone equips a pretty regular 5-inches TFT screen and you will get the compact look. But, the phone weighs 143-grams, and the front display has the thickest bezels we have seen in 2021. The hardware section arrives with a Unisoc SC7731e chipset that onboard along with a quad-core processor. The software layering of the Android 11 Go edition attains on the phone. Single-camera on the back panel present; it’s none other than a 5MP lens (up-scaled to 8MP) that can record up to 720p video recording. The 2MP (up-scaled to 5MP) selfie is also present. Under the hood, you will only get the average sensor—such as an accelerometer. For power supply, you are getting a Li-Ion 2000 mAh battery that grants average screen time, while you can choose from color options of Blue and Black. The phone is available in 1GB RAM with a 32GB storage variant.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 12/18/2021
Comment
ZTE:
ZTE is short for Zhong Xing Telecommunication Equipment Company Limited, which was founded in China in 1985 and is partly state-owned. ZTE's core business is wireless, optical transmission, data transmission equipment, telecommunications software and cell phones, USB sticks, routers and tablets.
These graphics cards are not suited for Windows 3D games. Office and Internet surfing however is possible.
Qualcomm Adreno 200: Integrated GPU in the Snapdragon S1 SoCs and based on the AMD Z430. Later called Adreno 200 with higher clock speeds.
unknown:
ARM Mali-400 MP2: OpenGL ES 2.0 GPU for ARM based SoCs with 2 fragment processors and 1 vertex processor.
ARM Mali-T720 MP2: Integrated graphics card in ARM based SoCs. Can be configured with up to 8 cores (T720 MP8) and 650 MHz core clock (at 28nm). Supports OpenGL ES 3.1, OpenCL 1.1, DirectX 11 FL9_3, and Renderscript.
Qualcomm Adreno 306: Integrated mid-range graphics card in the Snapdragon 410 SoCs that supports OpenGL ES 3.0 and features unified shaders.
ARM Mali-T720: Integrated graphics card in ARM based SoCs. Can be configured with up to 8 cores (T720 MP8) and 650 MHz core clock (at 28nm). Supports OpenGL ES 3.1, OpenCL 1.1, DirectX 11 FL9_3, and Renderscript.
ARM Mali-T720 MP4: Integrated graphics card with four clusters clocked at up to 600 MHz. The chip supports OpenGL ES 3.1 and is typically produced in 28nm.
ARM Mali-400 MP: OpenGL ES 2.0 graphics card for ARM SoCs that is scaleable from one to four fragment processors and has got one vertex processor. Mainly used in conjunction with ARM A9 cores in tablets and smartphones.
Imagination PowerVR GE8320: Integrated graphics card for mid-range ARM SoCs.
Only some 3D games with very low demands are playable with these cards.
Qualcomm Adreno 405: Integrated graphics card for ARM based SoCs. Depending on the used SoC the clock rate is around 500 MHz and features 48 unified shaders.
ARM Mali-T860 MP2: Dual-Core version of the Mali-T860 graphics card from ARM for mostly Android based smartphones and tablets. E.g. in the Mediatek Helio P10 clocked at 700 MHz and produced in 28nm.
Qualcomm Adreno 506: Integrated graphics card in the Snapdragon 625 SoC and based on the new 500-series architecture with support for Vulkan, OpenGL ES 3.1 + AE (3.2) and UBWC.
Qualcomm Adreno 505: Mid range graphics card integrated in the Snapdragon 430 and 435 SoCs. Based on the 500 generation and supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0, OpenGL ES 3.1 + AE, OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 12.
PowerVR GE8322 / IMG8322: Entry level graphics card based on the PowerVR Rogue architecture with support for OpenGL ES 3.2 and Vulkan 1.1.
Non demanding games should be playable with these graphics cards.
ARM Mali-G72 MP3: Integrated graphics card from ARM with 3 cores based on the 2nd generation of the Bifrost architecture.
Qualcomm Adreno 620: Integrated (in the Snapdragon 765 and 765G) graphics card based on the Adreno 600 architecture. Supports DirectX11_1, Vulkan 1.0, OpenCL 2.0, OpenGL ES 3.2. The 765G variant is 10% faster than the one integrated in the 765 and 20% faster than the Adreno 618 predecessor.
ARM Mali-G52 MP2: Integrated mid range graphics card with 2 clusters. ARM states that the G52 series is 30% faster and 15% more efficient compared to the G51 series on the same process node.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
Qualcomm Snapdragon:
S1 MSM7227A: Entry level Soc with one Cortex-A5 processor core and a Adreno 200 GPU.
615 MSM8939:
Mid-range ARM SoC with 8 CPU cores (Cortex-A53, 64-bit capable) and an Adreno 405 GPU. Manufactured in a 28 nm LP process.
410 MSM8916: 64-Bit Cortex-A53 Quad-Core with an Adreno 306 GPU manufactured in 28nm
617 MSM8952: Mid-range ARM SoC with 8 CPU cores (Cortex-A53, 64-bit capable) and an Adreno 405 GPU. Manufactured in a 28 nm LP process.
625: Mid-range octa-core SoC with eight ARM Cortex-A53 cpu cores at up to 2 GHz, an Adreno 506 GPU, a DDR3L-1866 memory controller and a X9 LTE (Cat 7) modem. Manufactured in the modern 14nm process.
435: Lower mainstream octa-core ARM Cortex-A53 SoC clocked at up to 1.4 GHz and the Adreno 505 GPU, a DDR3L-1600 memory controller as well as an X9 LTE (Cat. 7) modem.
SD 450: Lower mainstream octa-core ARM Cortex-A53 SoC clocked at up to 1.8 GHz and the Adreno 506 GPU, a LPDDR3 single channel memory controller as well as an X9 LTE (Cat. 7 300 / 150 Mbps) modem.
SD 765G: Fast mid-range ARM SoC with 8 CPU Kryo 475 cores (one fast ARM Cortex-A76 prime core at up to 2.4 GHz, one A76 gold core at 2.2 GHz and 6 small ARM Cortex-A55 cores at up to 1.8 GHz). As one of the first SoCs it also integrates a 5G modem (Snapdragon X52 up to 3,7 / 1,6 Mbps down- and upload, mmWave and Sub-6 support). The processor is manufactured in the modern and energy efficient 7nm EUV process at Samsung.
Mediatek Mediatek:
MT6582M: Quad-core SoC (Cortex-A7) for tablets and smartphones.
MT6735: A 64-bit quad-core SoC (4x ARM Cortex-A53) clocked at up to 1.5 GHz and designed for inexpensive tablets and smartphones.
MT6735P: A 64-bit quad-core SoC (4x ARM Cortex-A53) clocked at up to 1 GHz and designed for inexpensive tablets and smartphones.
MT6750: ARM-based octa-core SoC (4x Cortex-A53 up to 1.5 GHz + 4x Cortex-A53 up to 1 GHz) with 64-Bit support and integrated LTE Cat. 6 radio.
MT6572:
Dual-Core Cortex-A7 SoC with an integrated ARM Mali-400 GPU.
MT6737: ARM based quad-core SOC (4x Cortex-A53) with 64-bit support and a clock of up to 1.3 GHz.
Helio P70: ARM based octa-core SoC with 4x big ARM Cortex-A73 cores and 4x small and power efficient ARM Cortex-A53 cores. All clocked up to 2.1 GHz. Integrates a Cat-7 (DL) / Cat-13 (UL) LTE Modem (4G), ARM Mali-G72 MP3 GPU and a dedicated AI processing unit.
Helio P60: ARM based octa-core SoC with 4x big ARM Cortex-A73 cores and 4x small and power efficient ARM Cortex-A53 cores. All clocked up to 2 GHz. Integrates a Cat-7 (DL) / Cat-13 (UL) LTE Modem (4G), ARM Mali-G72 MP3 GPU and a dedicated AI processing unit.
:
SC9863A: Entry level octa core SoC with 8 ARM Cortex-A55 cores in two clusters. One performance cluster with up to 1.6 GHz and a efficiency cluster with up to 1.2 GHz. The SoC also integrates an LTE modem, a IMG8322 GPU and 1080p video support.
T618: Entry level octa core SoC with two fast ARM Cortex A75 cores at up to 2 GHz and six power efficient ARM Cortex A55 cores at up to 2 GHz. The SoC furthermore includes a LTE modem (TDD-LTE, FDD-LTE, TDSCDMA, WCDMA, CDMA, GSM), an ARM Mali G52MP2 GPU and a tri core ISP. The chip is manufactured at TSMC in 12nm FinFET.
Mediatek Helio 20:
Helio P22 MT6762: ARM based octa core SoC (8x ARM Cortex-A53) clocked at up to 2 GHz. The chip also includes a Cat.7 LTE modem (300 Mbps download).
Spreadtrum:
SC7731: Entry level smartphone SoC with a ARM Mali-400 MP2 and wireless radios (up to HSPA+).
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
5.00:
It is a very small display format for smartphones. You should by no means be mis-sighted and you will generally see very little on the screen and only have a small resolution available. In return, the device should be very small and handy.
6.00:
It is a small display format for smartphones. You shouldn't be severely defective in vision, and you won't see much detail on the screen and only have a small resolution available. For that, the device should be small and handy, easy to transport.
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.
No weight comment found (one expected)!
74.68%: This rating is poor. More than three quarters of the models are rated better. That is rather not a purchase recommendation. Even if verbal ratings in this area do not sound that bad ("sufficient" or "satisfactory"), they are usually euphemisms that disguise a classification as a below-average laptop.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.