ZTE Blade V

Specifications

ZTE Blade V (Blade Series)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225Q

Graphics adapter

unknown

Display

4 inch 5:3, 800 x 480 pixel, glossy: yes

Weight

130 g ( = 4.59 oz / 0.29 pounds) ( = 0 oz / 0 pounds)

Price

200 Euro

Links

ZTE homepage

[+] Add to comparison

» Compare devices

Pricecompare

Average Score: 80% - good
Average of 1 scores (from 1 reviews)

price: 80%, performance: 60%, features: - %, display: - % mobility: - %, workmanship: - %, ergonomy: - %, emissions: - %

Reviews for the ZTE Blade V

80% ZTE Blade V
Source: Gadgetspeak English

Remembering that this is a budget priced smartphone costing well under £100, its performance is more than reasonable. In a head-to-head contest with the recently released Moto G, it would come in second with regards to speed, functionality and video display but then the Moto G lacks the micro SD option and costs around £50 more.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/30/2014
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% performance: 60%

Comment

unknown: These graphics cards are not suited for Windows 3D games. Office and Internet surfing however is possible. » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
S4 Play MSM8225Q: » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
4":

This is one of the smallest diagonal for smartphones.

Large display-sizes allow higher resolutions. So, details like letters are bigger. On the other hand, the power consumption is lower with small screen diagonals and the devices are smaller, more lightweight and cheaper.

» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.
0.13 kg:

Only few smartphones are more lightweight than this.

ZTE:

ZTE is short for Zhong Xing Telecommunication Equipment Company Limited, which was founded in China in 1985. The product range includes, for example, USB sticks, routers, smartphones and tablets.

The ratings of the relatively many reviews have a wide range from below-average to very good (as of 2016).

80%: This rating is not convincing. The laptop is evaluated below average, this is not really a recommendation for purchase.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.