ZTE Blade V7 Plus
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix
Average of 1 scores (from 2 reviews)
Reviews for the ZTE Blade V7 Plus
The ZTE Blade V7 Plus is priced in the low end range and performs very well for a $290 phone. The hardware is great quality and the software is decent without being intrusive or covered in bells and whistles that you’ll never use. While the processor/RAM combination is a tad slow at times it is not like you spend a multitude of seconds waiting for it to stop hanging up. Not once did I experience a hang up, so although the apps took a fraction of a second longer to open than usual they still opened in a reasonable amount of time.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/20/2017
Rating: Total score: 76% price: 90% mobility: 69%
Source: Smartphone e tablet android IT→EN
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/31/2017
Rating: performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 70%
CommentARM Mali-T720 MP4: Integrated graphics card with four clusters clocked at up to 600 MHz. The chip supports OpenGL ES 3.1 and is typically produced in 28nm. These graphics cards are not suited for Windows 3D games. Office and Internet surfing however is possible. » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
MT6753: » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
This display is quite big for a smartphone but frequently used for smartphones.
Large display-sizes allow higher resolutions. So, details like letters are bigger. On the other hand, the power consumption is lower with small screen diagonals and the devices are smaller, more lightweight and cheaper.» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.
Only few smartphones are more lightweight than this.
ZTE is short for Zhong Xing Telecommunication Equipment Company Limited, which was founded in China in 1985. The product range includes, for example, USB sticks, routers, smartphones and tablets.
The ratings of the relatively many reviews have a wide range from below-average to very good (as of 2016).
76%: This rating is not convincing. The laptop is evaluated below average, this is not really a recommendation for purchase.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.