Alcatel A5 LED
Specifications

Secondary Camera: 5 MPix FF, front flash
Price comparison
Average of 11 scores (from 33 reviews)
Reviews for the Alcatel A5 LED
Source: PC Quest
Archive.org versionAlcatel recently announced the launch its new smartphone variants A5 LED and A7. With the launch of multiple functionalities, as well as immersive selfie features, the A5 and A7 bring a new level of performance and experience, opening up a new era of smartphone interface.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/15/2017
Source: Techradar
Archive.org versionAlcatel is still taking a gimmicky approach to the budget Android phone market, but a flashy LED array fails to mask a long list of distinctly disappointing compromises.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/18/2017
Rating: Total score: 50%
Source: Trusted Reviews
Archive.org versionThe Alcatel A5 LED is certainly different, and while the LED-packed back is eye-catching, there are too many problems at the phone’s core to make this a serious consideration over the Lenovo Moto G5.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/27/2017
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Stuff TV
Archive.org versionThe A5 LED is a fun gimmick, tacked onto a bad phone - the opposite of what you might expect with a high-concept mobile like this.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/08/2017
Rating: Total score: 40%
Source: Stuff TV
Archive.org versionThe A5 LED is undeniably attention-grabbing, and the price is right too. It’s set to arrive in Europe from May onwards for €199, which should mean £170 here in the UK. That’s not bad at all given the spec, and an absolute bargain if you want a unique phone that’s guaranteed to grab attention.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/28/2017
Source: Trusted Reviews
Archive.org versionThe big question is whether you can get more phone for your money, and while we need to live with the A5 for a bit before properly judging it, my suspicion is it will pale in comparison to affordable wonders like the new Moto G5, which is available at the same price point but boasts superior hardware and newer software.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/27/2017
Foreign Reviews
Source: Curved
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/27/2017
Source: Computerhoy
ES→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/10/2017
Rating: price: 70% features: 60% display: 60% mobility: 70% workmanship: 70%
Source: Android Geek
PT→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Impressive led light; nice display. Negative: Short battery life; low performance; poor cameras.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/23/2017
Source: Canaltech
PT→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Impressive design; support dual sim. Negative: High price.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/02/2017
Source: 4G News
PT→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Low price; decent hardware; nice display. Negative: Average performance.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/20/2017
Source: Andrea Galeazzi
IT→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/23/2017
Rating: Total score: 75% price: 75% display: 65% mobility: 65% workmanship: 90%
Source: Ridble
IT→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/16/2017
Rating: Total score: 50%
Source: AndroidWorld.it
IT→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/09/2017
Rating: Total score: 68% price: 65% features: 65% display: 65% mobility: 65% workmanship: 80%
Source: HDblog.it
IT→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/04/2017
Rating: Total score: 66%
Source: Smartphone e tablet android
IT→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/16/2017
Rating: performance: 60% display: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 70%
Source: Androidiani
IT→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Low price; impressive design. Negative: No fingerprint sensor; poor cameras.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/19/2017
Source: Tutto App Android
IT→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Impressive LED design; long battery life. Negative: Poor display.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/31/2017
Source: Tecno Cino
IT→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Impressive design; decent battery life. Negative: Poor display.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/26/2017
Source: Frandroid
FR→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/11/2017
Rating: Total score: 50% performance: 50% display: 40% mobility: 60% workmanship: 50%
Source: AndroidPit.fr
FR→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/10/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Top for Phone
FR→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Impressive design; decent hardware.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/04/2017
Source: AndroidPit.fr
FR→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Low price. Negative: Average performance.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/07/2017
Source: Teleguru
PL→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Impressive LED design; decent performance; support 4G LTE; radio FM. Negative: Poor display; poor cameras; short battery life.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/20/2017
Source: Log.com.tr
TR→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/30/2017
Rating: Total score: 72%
Source: Helpix
RU→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/08/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Mobileimho.ru
RU→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Impressive LED design; nice display; decent performance. Negative: Poor cameras; short battery life.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/03/2017
Source: Yamobi
RU→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Nice display; support LTE; impressive design. Negative: Short battery life; poor cameras.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/02/2017
Source: DGL.ru
RU→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Nice design; impressive led; decent battery life. Negative: Average performance.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/23/2017
Source: Mobile Review
RU→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Good speakers. Negative: High price; poor cameras; average performance.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/14/2017
Source: Hitech Vesti
RU→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Solid workmanship; good cameras. Negative: Uncomfortable buttons.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/24/2017
Source: AndroidInsider.ru
RU→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Low price; impressive design. Negative: Average performance.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/16/2017
Source: CNews.cz
CZ→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Support dual sim; original backlight. Negative: Low performance; weak hardware; average stamina; slow charging.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/03/2017
Comment
ARM Mali-T720 MP4: Integrated graphics card with four clusters clocked at up to 600 MHz. The chip supports OpenGL ES 3.1 and is typically produced in 28nm.
These graphics cards are not suited for Windows 3D games. Office and Internet surfing however is possible.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
MT6753: » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
