Notebookcheck Logo

Leagoo T1 Plus

Specifications

Leagoo T1 Plus
Leagoo T1 Plus
Processor
Mediatek MT6735 4 x 1.5 GHz, Cortex-A53
Graphics adapter
Memory
3 GB 
Display
5.00 inch 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixel, glossy: yes
Weight
173 g ( = 6.1 oz / 0.38 pounds) ( = 0 oz / 0 pounds)

 

Pricecompare

Average Score: 75% - good
Average of 1 scores (from 2 reviews)
price: - %, performance: 80%, features: - %, display: 80% mobility: 70%, workmanship: 90%, ergonomy: - %, emissions: - %

Reviews for the Leagoo T1 Plus

75% Leagoo T1 Plus
Source: Chinahandys.net German DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/28/2016
Rating: Total score: 75% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 90%
Test du Leagoo T1 Plus : un selfie-phone à la chinoise
Source: Top for Phone French FR→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good cameras; long battery life; solid workmanship. Negative: Mediocre APN.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/27/2016

Comment

ARM Mali-T720: Integrated graphics card in ARM based SoCs. Can be configured with up to 8 cores (T720 MP8) and 650 MHz core clock (at 28nm). Supports OpenGL ES 3.1, OpenCL 1.1, DirectX 11 FL9_3, and Renderscript.

These graphics cards are not suited for Windows 3D games. Office and Internet surfing however is possible.

» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.


MT6735: A 64-bit quad-core SoC (4x ARM Cortex-A53) clocked at up to 1.5 GHz and designed for inexpensive tablets and smartphones.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.


5.00":

This display is tiny. You will probably see very little on the screen and be able to use mini-resolutions.

» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.


Leagoo:

Leagoo is a brand created by the Chinese company Shenzhen OTEDA Technology Co. Ltd in 2014. The market share is just as low as the number of test reports in the media. Before 2016, there are hardly any tests. The achieved ratings are slightly below average (as of 2016).


75%: This rating is poor. More than three quarters of the models are rated better. That is rather not a purchase recommendation. Even if verbal ratings in this area do not sound that bad ("sufficient" or "satisfactory"), they are usually euphemisms that disguise a classification as a below-average laptop.


» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.

 

Please share our article, every link counts!

Similar devices from a different Manufacturer

Wiko Harry
Mali-T720
Doogee T3
Mali-T720
Huawei Y6 Pro
Mali-T720
Doogee Y300
Mali-T720
Wiko U Feel
Mali-T720

Devices from a different Manufacturer and/or with a different CPU

Coolpad Note 5 Lite C
Mali-T720, Mediatek MT6735M
Alcatel Pixi 4 (5)
Mali-T720, Mediatek MT6735M
Blackview A9 Pro
Mali-T720, Mediatek MT6737
Lenovo Moto C
Mali-T720, Mediatek MT6737
Panasonic P77
Mali-T720, Mediatek MT6735P
Oukitel C5 Pro
Mali-T720, Mediatek MT6737
Nokia 3
Mali-T720, Mediatek MT6737
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
Mali-T720, Exynos Exynos 7570
Lenovo Moto E3
Mali-T720, Mediatek MT6735P
Ulefone Metal
Mali-T720, Mediatek MT6753

Devices with the same GPU

Doro 8020X
Mali-T720, Mediatek MT6735M, 4.50", 0.185 kg
Wileyfox Spark X Add-X
Mali-T720, Mediatek MT6735, 5.50", 0.1625 kg
Wiko UPulse
Mali-T720, unknown, 5.50", 0.167 kg
ZTE Blade A910
Mali-T720, Mediatek MT6735, 5.50", 0.135 kg
Lenovo Vibe B
Mali-T720, Mediatek MT6735M, 4.50", 0.144 kg
Archos 55 Helium Ultra
Mali-T720, Mediatek MT6737, 5.50", 0.162 kg
Current Prices
Stefan Hinum (Update: 2016-09-28)