Leagoo T1 Plus

Name: Leagoo T1 Plus
Brand: Leagoo
Rating: 75 (1 reviews)

Specifications

Leagoo T1 Plus

Processor

Mediatek MT6735

Graphics adapter

ARM Mali-T720

Memory

3072 MB

Display

5 inch 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixel, glossy: yes

Weight

173 g ( = 6.1 oz / 0.38 pounds) ( = 0 oz / 0 pounds)

[+] Add to comparison

» Compare devices

Pricecompare

Average Score: 75% - good
Average of 1 scores (from 2 reviews)

price: - %, performance: 80%, features: - %, display: 80% mobility: 70%, workmanship: 90%, ergonomy: - %, emissions: - %

Reviews for the Leagoo T1 Plus

75% Leagoo T1 Plus
Source: Chinahandys.net German

DE→EN
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/28/2016
Rating: Total score: 75% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 90%

Test du Leagoo T1 Plus : un selfie-phone à la chinoise
Source: Top for Phone French

FR→EN
Positive: Good cameras; long battery life; solid workmanship. Negative: Mediocre APN.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/27/2016

Comment

ARM Mali-T720: Integrated graphics card in ARM based SoCs. Can be configured with up to 8 cores (T720 MP8) and 650 MHz core clock (at 28nm). Supports OpenGL ES 3.1, OpenCL 1.1, DirectX 11 FL9_3, and Renderscript.

These graphics cards are not suited for Windows 3D games. Office and Internet surfing however is possible.

» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.

MT6735: A 64-bit quad-core SoC (4x ARM Cortex-A53) clocked at up to 1.5 GHz and designed for inexpensive tablets and smartphones.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.

5":

This is a typical smartphone diagonal.

» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.

0.173 kg:

Only few smartphones are more lightweight than this.

Leagoo:

Leagoo is a brand created by the Chinese company Shenzhen OTEDA Technology Co. Ltd in 2014. The market share is just as low as the number of test reports in the media. Before 2016, there are hardly any tests. The achieved ratings are slightly below average (as of 2016).

75%: This rating is bad. Most notebooks are better rated. This is not a recommendation for purchase.

» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.