Gretel GT6000 Smartphone Review

Gretel is a Chinese smartphone manufacturer that generally specializes in low-end devices. Like many other Asian producers, they rely on chips from Mediatek that run at moderate to slow speeds. The GT6000’s processor team consists of an MT6737 CPU and a Mali-T720 graphics chip. The two have 2 GB of working memory at their command. The device is equipped with 16 GB of storage space, 12 GB of which remain available to the user. The 6000 mAh battery is a special feature. For a price of a little over 90 Euros (~$110), other Chinese manufacturers have offered better specs.
We are pitting the Gretel GT6000 against other competitors of Chinese origin: Like the GT6000, the Blackview P2 has a 6000 mAh battery. The Lenovo Moto C Plus and the Blackview A8 Max are equipped with batteries only half as big, but otherwise their features are comparable. Alongside similar specs, the Blackview A9 Pro also has a dual-camera that we determined to be quite good.
Are you a techie who knows how to write? Then join our Team! Wanted:
- Specialist News Writer
- Magazine Writer
- Translator (DE<->EN)
Details here
Case
The case is made of aluminum, and at first glance appears very robust. The edges are well-defined and the speaker grille is cut cleanly. The keys have a distinct click point. As a result of its weight and material composition, the GT6000 feels very stable and high-quality. The device’s shape is easy to grip and sits comfortably in your hand. But there is a little problem on the back side: Directly adjacent to the USB port, there is a small indentation where something inside the phone did not quite fit. Or perhaps the smartphone was not assembled correctly. This does not influence the device’s function, and is only visible upon closer inspection. Even so, it detracts from our otherwise positive overall impression.
The battery cannot be switched out - though considering its size, this should not be necessary. Logically, the back cover cannot be removed either. The SIM card slips into a tray, as in the iPhone. The tray has space for a micro SIM card and a nano SIM card, which makes the device dual-SIM capable. In place of the micro SIM card, the user can choose to insert an SD card with up to 32 GB of storage.
Top 10 Laptops
Multimedia, Budget Multimedia, Gaming, Budget Gaming, Lightweight Gaming, Business, Budget Office, Workstation, Subnotebooks, Ultrabooks, Chromebooks
under 300 USD/Euros, under 500 USD/Euros, 1,000 USD/Euros, for University Students, Best Displays
Top 10 Smartphones
Smartphones, Phablets, ≤6-inch, Camera Smartphones
Connectivity
The device runs on a sedate Mediatek MT6737 quad-core processor at 1.3 GHz. The ARM Mali T720 graphics unit takes things at a similarly leisurely pace. Even so, for the most part the smartphone operates fluidly - a happy circumstance that arises from the lack of bloatware. At 2 GB, the RAM is not exactly bountiful; but today’s iOS devices generally do not offer more here. 16 GB of storage space is skirting the lower limit for these Chinese smartphones. According to the manufacturer, the GT6000 supports memory expansion to up to 32 GB. This additional memory can be formatted as internal.
In terms of connections, the Gretel proves spartan: The bottom edge houses a micro-USB connection, mirrored in placement by the headphone jack. The volume rocker and power button reside to the right - the tray for the SIM and/or SD card is located opposite. In our tests, the GT6000 did not accept any cards larger than the stated 32 GB. The connections and buttons are all spaced far apart, which should prevent users from accidentally hitting the wrong keys or sticking things in the wrong slot. The only potential problem we encountered was with the USB port, which holds USB cables a little loosely.
Software
The relatively up-to-date Android version 7.0 serves as the operating system. The Android security updates date from the end of July 2017. Aside from the altered standard icons in the interface, the system appears unchanged. The UI also lacks an app drawer, so the icons are immediately visible on the front screen. Gretel abstained from loading the smartphone with unnecessary bloatware. Some additional apps like FM radio, Parallel Space, Facebook and WhatsApp come pre-installed. The latter two can be deleted.
Communication and GPS
In terms of communication, the GT6000 offers the standard fare: Bluetooth 4.0, WLAN in the standards 802.11 b/g/n (including the 5-GHz band), as well as LTE in the frequencies 800, 900, 1800, 2100 and 2600 MHz. With those specs, the smartphone can be used in many places (including Germany).
The WLAN speed is reasonably high for its class, as our comparison chart with other phones from Asia demonstrates. Here the GT6000 easily takes the lead, by and large. But compared with high-end devices, the Gretel phone cannot claim to hold its own. High-end devices generally possess considerably more powerful WLAN chips and reach speeds around 5x as fast.
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Blackview P2 | |
Gretel GT6000 | |
Blackview A8 Max | |
Blackview A9 Pro | |
Lenovo Moto C Plus | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Gretel GT6000 | |
Blackview P2 | |
Blackview A9 Pro | |
Lenovo Moto C Plus | |
Blackview A8 Max |
The GPS module yields below-average results. According to our GPS test, it is only accurate to about 8 meters (~26 feet). At that level of inexactitude, obviously it does not matter whether the user is located in a building or outside. Top-of-the-line devices are accurate to around 3 meters (~10 feet), though the signal strength is weaker indoors. The Gretel GT6000 uses exclusively GPS data; there is no receiver for Glonass or other satellite systems.
This inaccuracy was clearly noticeable on our test track; Gretel went especially far astray in the vicinity of the forest. The altitude measurement deviated by up to 20 meters (~65 feet) from that of our Garmin Edge 500 reference device. As a general rule, that is a fairly trivial matter. Nevertheless: Anyone who values accuracy here should back away from this device.
Phone Function and Speech Quality
To perform the original primary function of a smartphone - phone calls - Gretel employs the standard Android telephone app. In contrast to the app logo, within the application the company uses unchanged symbols. Our test phone call went smoothly. Our conversation partner was easy to understand, though the finer sounds associated with speech were a bit muffled. We did not hear any distortion or background noise.
The smartphone does not come with a headset.
Cameras
The camera equipment looks truly impressive on paper: a 5 MP selfie camera, and a dual camera with 13 MP on the back. These specs piqued our curiosity, especially given that the Blackview A9 Pro’s dual camera takes astonishingly good photos, even though it only offers 8 MP. Unfortunately, the GT6000 isn’t quite as convincing here. The front camera generates washed out and blurry pictures, much like one would expect of a 2 MP camera. Due to the higher resolution, the back camera’s pictures contain more detail. Zooming in closer, a bit of a pixelated effect is detectable. The bokeh effect (background blur) doesn’t come close to that of the A9 Pro. But in principle, the back camera’s performance is solid. In poor lighting, the photos are extremely dark - as our sample shot demonstrates.
The colors according to ColorChecker are perfectly alright. But if you look at the actual photos, enthusiasm wanes. There seems to be a problem with contrast here, clearly noticeable in the picture with the daises. Despite several attempts, we were unable to capture the petals as a crisp image; they came out as uniform white spots. Even the yellow centers of the flowers blur into the white petals. However, the blades of grass behind the flowers are composed of different shades and rendered out of focus - just as they ought to be. Pictures with less in the way of color contrast look reasonably good.
Accessories and Warranty
The selection of accessories included with the smartphone is rather spartan: a silicone shell and a USB cable with a charging device are all you will find. The manufacturer does not offer any other customized accessories.
There is little to say on the subject of warranty conditions either: The manufacturer does not provide any information here. Chinese companies often accept returns, as long as it can be proven from a distance that the item is defective. But return shipment is quite difficult, especially given that it usually costs 40-50 Euros (~$50-60). Considering the price of the device, customers are unlikely to want to go to the trouble. If you order the device from China, please take a look at our article on CE marking and customs clearance. Moreover, please see our Guarantees, Return Policies & Warranties FAQ for country-specific information. If you want to play it safe, purchase the device through a distributor in your home country. If you buy the device from a distributor in the EU, the distributor is legally required to accept returns for 14 days, and the minimum warranty period is two years.
Input Devices and Operation
The keyboard does not have any special features; Gretel employs the standard Android keyboard. The concept behind the operation of the standard Android buttons is more interesting, though, as they are constructed as separate buttons. The Home button has an integrated fingerprint reader, which the user can utilize to unlock the phone in standby mode - though the process is rather slow. The home button’s functionality is comparable to that of the A9 Pro: It is only touch-sensitive and cannot be pressed down. If the user holds it continuously, the phone displays an overview of open apps. To the right of the Home button is the Back button; to the left the Properties button.
The touchscreen supports 5-point touch and is comfortable to use. It reacts sufficiently fast - though in our test with a piano playing app, a slight delay was perceptible. That should only matter for apps that require a quick response time. The automatic rotation is also a little slow.
Display
In choosing the display, Gretel certainly did some things right. The IPS panel is especially good in the realm of brightness - at well over 600 cd/m², it manages to stand out from the not necessarily weak competition. On other other hand, the resolution of 720 x 1280 pixels is not exactly up-to-date. But to complain here is to have exceedingly high standards - even at this resolution, individual pixels are only visible at close range at best. Considering the screen’s other qualities and the price, Gretel chose the right place to cut costs.
|
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 669 cd/m²
Contrast: 1858:1 (Black: 0.36 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.4 | 0.55-29.43 Ø5.1
ΔE Greyscale 6.9 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
Gamma: 2.34
Gretel GT6000 IPS, 1280x720, 5.50 | Blackview P2 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.50 | Blackview A9 Pro IPS, 1280x720, 5.00 | Blackview A8 Max IPS, 1280x720, 5.50 | Lenovo Moto C Plus IPS, 1280x720, 5.00 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | -39% | -8% | -51% | -2% | |
Brightness middle | 669 | 424 -37% | 473 -29% | 435 -35% | 492 -26% |
Brightness | 644 | 420 -35% | 466 -28% | 407 -37% | 472 -27% |
Brightness Distribution | 92 | 85 -8% | 91 -1% | 86 -7% | 90 -2% |
Black Level * | 0.36 | 0.15 58% | 0.35 3% | 1.08 -200% | 0.23 36% |
Contrast | 1858 | 2827 52% | 1351 -27% | 403 -78% | 2139 15% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.4 | 9.5 -116% | 4.4 -0% | 5.7 -30% | 5.4 -23% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9 | 19.7 -119% | 10.5 -17% | 12.3 -37% | 12 -33% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.9 | 14.5 -110% | 4.7 32% | 5.9 14% | 3.7 46% |
Gamma | 2.34 94% | 2.28 96% | 2.33 94% | 2.18 101% | 2.05 107% |
CCT | 6675 97% | 10840 60% | 7343 89% | 8164 80% | 7182 91% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19019 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
The image display is also pretty impressive. Though the device does not take the crown here, the quality it achieves is above average. The display’s black value and contrast are very good, and its color reproduction is above average too. For this price, there is nothing whatsoever to complain about.
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
19.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6 ms rise | |
↘ 13.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 34 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
33.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 12.4 ms rise | |
↘ 21.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 37 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (34.6 ms). |
The viewing angle stability is excellent. From nearly every angle, the display is easily readable and exhibits no discernible distortions in color. The black along the edges is displayed as gray, but the high display brightness is responsible for that alteration. The edges look the same whether viewed from the side or straight on.
Performance
The Mediatek MT6737 at work in the Gretel GT6000 is, by today’s standards, an absolute low-end CPU. Even so, the device performs its duties valiantly: In our tests, we hardly noticed any delays. The smartphone ran fluidly in almost every instance. Even with numerous open tabs, the browser functioned smoothly - even if the Mozilla Kraken benchmark scores were rather weak. Overall, that is truly astonishing. Gretel seems to have done something right here.
The hardware’s weak constitution does start to show when loading previously photographed images. These shots are clearly saved as progressive JPEGs and load very slowly when opened. This means that shortly after a photo is taken, it always looks blurry. A little patience is needed before the image’s true sharpness can be evaluated.
For an inexpensive smartphone, the performance is acceptable. Today’s high-end smartphones are around 5-6 times faster.
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Gretel GT6000 | |
Blackview P2 | |
Blackview A9 Pro | |
Blackview A8 Max | |
Lenovo Moto C Plus |
PCMark for Android | |
Work performance score (sort by value) | |
Gretel GT6000 | |
Blackview P2 | |
Blackview A9 Pro | |
Blackview A8 Max | |
Lenovo Moto C Plus | |
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
Gretel GT6000 | |
Blackview P2 | |
Blackview A9 Pro | |
Blackview A8 Max | |
Lenovo Moto C Plus |
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
Gretel GT6000 | |
Blackview P2 | |
Blackview A9 Pro | |
Lenovo Moto C Plus | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
Gretel GT6000 | |
Blackview P2 | |
Blackview A9 Pro | |
Lenovo Moto C Plus | |
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value) | |
Gretel GT6000 | |
Blackview P2 | |
Blackview A9 Pro |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Gretel GT6000 | |
Blackview P2 | |
Blackview A9 Pro | |
Blackview A8 Max | |
Lenovo Moto C Plus | |
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Gretel GT6000 | |
Blackview P2 | |
Blackview A9 Pro | |
Blackview A8 Max | |
Lenovo Moto C Plus |
GFXBench 3.0 | |
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
Gretel GT6000 | |
Blackview P2 | |
Blackview A9 Pro | |
Blackview A8 Max | |
Lenovo Moto C Plus | |
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Gretel GT6000 | |
Blackview P2 | |
Blackview A9 Pro | |
Blackview A8 Max | |
Lenovo Moto C Plus |
GFXBench 3.1 | |
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Gretel GT6000 | |
Blackview P2 | |
Blackview A9 Pro | |
Blackview A8 Max | |
Lenovo Moto C Plus | |
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Gretel GT6000 | |
Blackview P2 | |
Blackview A9 Pro | |
Blackview A8 Max | |
Lenovo Moto C Plus |
GFXBench | |
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Gretel GT6000 | |
Blackview P2 | |
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Gretel GT6000 | |
Blackview P2 |
Epic Citadel - Ultra High Quality (sort by value) | |
Blackview A8 Max |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
Blackview P2 (Chrome Version 58) | |
Blackview A8 Max (Chrome Version 53) | |
Gretel GT6000 (Chrome Version 51) | |
Blackview A9 Pro (Chrome Browser Version 59) | |
Lenovo Moto C Plus (Chrome Version 60) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Blackview P2 (Chrome Version 58) | |
Blackview A8 Max (Chrome Version 53) | |
Gretel GT6000 (Chrome Version 51) | |
Blackview A9 Pro (Chrome Browser Version 59) | |
Lenovo Moto C Plus (Chrome Version 60) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score | |
Gretel GT6000 (Chrome Version 51) | |
Blackview A9 Pro (Chrome Browser Version 59) | |
Lenovo Moto C Plus (Chrome Version 60) | |
Blackview A8 Max (Chrome Version 53) | |
Blackview P2 (Chrome Version 58) |
* ... smaller is better
Compared with the throngs of current smartphones, our mass storage device’s speeds fall among the lower third. However, these speeds are on par with our device’s true competition. Only the more expensive and better equipped Blackview P2 achieves significantly better results here.
The GT6000’s SD card slot leaves much to be desired. In our test with a Toshiba Exceria SD-CX32UHS1, we recorded write speeds of a little over 8 MB per second. The competition manages speeds nearly twice as fast, and that despite not being particularly fast in its own right. In terms of read speeds, the competitors all obtain similarly low results.
Gretel GT6000 | Blackview P2 | Blackview A9 Pro | Blackview A8 Max | Lenovo Moto C Plus | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | 64% | 2% | 7% | 5% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 215 | 264.8 23% | 189.6 -12% | 141.8 -34% | 186.7 -13% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 44.16 | 133.8 203% | 37.63 -15% | 47.25 7% | 44.45 1% |
Random Read 4KB | 19.4 | 22.07 14% | 12.18 -37% | 16.15 -17% | 18.1 -7% |
Random Write 4KB | 8.46 | 9.54 13% | 7.1 -16% | 5.65 -33% | 15.4 82% |
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 36.76 ? | 34.26 ? -7% | 33.07 ? -10% | 35.94 ? -2% | 13.5 -63% |
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 8.29 ? | 19.61 ? 137% | 16.47 ? 99% | 18.5 ? 123% | 10.7 29% |
Games
The GT6000’s gaming performance is surprisingly good. Despite its very feeble ARM Mali T720 processor, even demanding titles like Asphalt 8 are playable on the device. This is astounding, particularly as the smartphone’s scores in the benchmarks are little to no better than those of comparably equipped competitors - and the competitors start to stutter very quickly in this game. Even so, potential buyers should consider the fact that this graphics chip stems from the lower league. If you’re a big gamer and want to invest in a smartphone that will continue to serve you well in the future, it would be prudent to look elsewhere. Among our comparison devices, only the Blackview P2 performs substantially better here, owing to its better graphics chip.
Subjectively, the position and acceleration sensors register changes a little slowly. This means the controls in racing games and the like feel somewhat spongy.
Emissions
The GT6000 proves to set store by modesty in the realm of temperatures, too. In use, the phone hardly feels warm at all. Our temperature measurements substantiate this subjective impression. In almost every spot, the device remains below body temperature. Only one corner of the front side warms to slightly over 40°C (104°F).
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.6 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.6 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
Speakers
Overall, the speakers perform decently. Like nearly all smartphone speakers, the sound lacks bass. The rest of the results are in the normal range, and the volume is above average. The speakers deliver no more and no less than one would expect. We did not detect any buzzing or other undesirable noises.
The exact number of speakers built into the device was not ascertainable. Obstructing the speaker grille had a negligible effect on the volume.
Gretel GT6000 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 37% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 70% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 39%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 84% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 26%, worst was 134%
Blackview A9 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (32.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 79% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 39%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 90% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 26%, worst was 134%
Frequenzdiagramm im Vergleich (Checkboxen oben an-/abwählbar!)
Battery Life
In the realm of energy consumption, the Gretel device produced similar results to all inexpensive phones from China: The rate of power usage is quite high. Though in the GT6000’s case, one culprit for this is the extra bright display. The competition from Blackview does not prove to manage energy usage much better. The only exception here is the Lenovo device, which particularly under load generates better results.
The power supply charges the smartphone fully in just under three and a half hours - an appropriate amount of time for such a large battery.
Off / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Idle | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Load |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Gretel GT6000 6000 mAh | Blackview P2 6000 mAh | Blackview A9 Pro 3000 mAh | Blackview A8 Max 3000 mAh | Lenovo Moto C Plus 4000 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 1% | -21% | 6% | 23% | |
Idle Minimum * | 0.96 | 0.99 -3% | 1.06 -10% | 0.74 23% | 0.8 17% |
Idle Average * | 1.8 | 2.04 -13% | 2.31 -28% | 1.97 -9% | 1.87 -4% |
Idle Maximum * | 1.89 | 2.12 -12% | 2.43 -29% | 2.09 -11% | 1.89 -0% |
Load Average * | 5.3 | 3.77 29% | 6.51 -23% | 4.89 8% | 2.18 59% |
Load Maximum * | 6.15 | 5.78 6% | 6.96 -13% | 5.09 17% | 3.61 41% |
* ... smaller is better
Battery Life
Despite its high energy consumption, when it comes to battery life, the GT6000 outpaces all its competitors. For the devices with substantially smaller batteries, that is no surprise. Only the Blackview P2 plays in the same league here, and our test device even beats the P2 by a margin of about 10%. Having said that, the P2 does provide considerably more processing power. In idle mode, at minimum brightness, with WLAN deactivated and the screen turned on, the smartphone should run for up to two days. If the device’s energy management were better, it would be possible to surpass even that run time. The world should pay attention - when it comes to energy consumption, Chinese smartphones are slowly but surely catching up.
If the battery is empty, it cannot be switched out - though when carrying a device with a 6000 mAh battery, users are unlikely to bring along a second battery in any case.
Gretel GT6000 6000 mAh | Blackview P2 6000 mAh | Blackview A9 Pro 3000 mAh | Blackview A8 Max 3000 mAh | Lenovo Moto C Plus 4000 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -13% | -48% | -58% | -29% | |
Reader / Idle | 2327 | 1957 -16% | 1157 -50% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 1201 | 1083 -10% | 711 -41% | 506 -58% | 858 -29% |
Load | 643 | 563 -12% | 293 -54% |
Pros
Cons
Verdict
The Gretel is no marvel of technology or speed. But that is no reason to take Hansel’s tack and ridicule it. Nearly every physical component offers good quality for the price. The device performs well in every discipline. The camera shoots reasonably good photos in good light. It has the most difficulty with strong contrasts, and the strange pixelated effect could serve as an insider tip for Minecraft fans. Despite the imprecise GPS, it should be possible to find one’s way out of the forest and back to papa’s house. Even without pebbles.
Solid entry-level device with an acceptable camera and good battery life.
A highlight is the especially bright display. Any real criticism is undeserved; all our complaints are trivial and certainly endurable.
This smartphone is very well suited for those in need of a long battery life, but with a slim wallet. If a little extra weight does not bother you, at a price of just under 100 Euros (~$120), we deem this product worthy of our recommendation.
Gretel GT6000
-
09/15/2017 v6(old)
Florian Schaar