Verdict on the Honor X80 Pro Max
A sleek, relatively slim phone that still withstands the elements and has a battery that lasts for days—that seemed like an unattainable dream just a few years ago.
With the Honor X80 Pro Max, however, the Chinese manufacturer is bringing exactly that kind of smartphone to market: It survives drops from a height of 3 meters with at most a few scratches, can be submerged in water, and can even be used in dusty environments; plus, its massive 11,000-mAh battery delivers battery life exceeding 29 hours in our Wi-Fi test. Of course, charging takes a while given its size.
The smartphone is affordable and offers solid performance, but it’s not a high-end phone, so you’ll have to do without features like really fast Wi-Fi and, above all, a versatile camera system: a single rear camera is really no longer up to date.
However, for those who prioritize stability, a bright screen, and their smartphone’s battery life, there’s currently hardly a more attractive alternative.
But you shouldn’t shy away from products imported from China, nor should you be too sensitive to PWM flicker on the screen.
Pros
Cons
Price and availability
The durable Honor X80 Pro Max is currently only available as a China import, for example from our rental partner TradingShenzhen starting at US$ 463.
Table of Contents
- Verdict on the Honor X80 Pro Max
- Specifications
- Case and features – Very durable
- Communication and operation – WiFi 7 with slow speeds
- Software and sustainability – No real promise of updates
- Cameras – Single on the back
- Display – Bright AMOLED
- Performance, emissions, and battery life – Progress and regression
- Notebookcheck Overall Rating
- Comparison of Possible Alternatives
Specifications
Case and features – Very durable
Despite its massive battery and IP69K certification, the Honor X80 Pro Max doesn’t look much different from other mid-range phones: It features a glossy metal frame and a smooth or faux-leather-covered back in light beige, red, or gray.
The chassis is just over 8 millimeters thick, and the phone weighs only 203 grams. The build quality is high; the Honor phone doesn’t creak or flex. According to the manufacturer, the phone has been tested to withstand drops from heights of up to 3 meters without significant damage.
When it comes to features, there are a few compromises: For example, there’s only a USB 2.0 port, and—due to the Chinese origin of our test unit—no eSIM support. However, it does feature NFC and an infrared sensor.
It comes with either 8 or 12 GB of RAM and 256 or 512 GB of storage.
Communication and operation – WiFi 7 with slow speeds
On paper, the Honor X80 Pro Max supports Wi-Fi 7 and actually connects to our router via the 6 GHz band. However, speeds are more on par with Wi-Fi 5; we achieve just above 500 Mbit/s. This is usually sufficient for everyday use.
It supports the essential 5G and 4G frequencies, so you can use it in Europe without any problems. When importing it to other countries, you should check which frequencies your mobile carrier requires, as the X80 Pro Max doesn’t support a very wide range of frequency bands.
The touchscreen is very responsive, and the side buttons have a distinct click and are easy to feel.
A fingerprint sensor is hidden behind the display; once set up, it unlocks the phone quickly and reliably. 2D facial recognition is also available.
| Networking | |
| Honor X80 Pro Max | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| Honor Magic8 Lite | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Gigaset GS6 Pro | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| Motorola Moto G87 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| Average of class Smartphone | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
Software and sustainability – No real promise of updates
Android 16 comes preinstalled, with Honor’s MagicOS 10 on top, which has a very clean and uncluttered interface. The security patches are from August 2026, so they’re quite up-to-date as of the time of testing. Security updates are scheduled to be released once per quarter.
There is no specific update promise for the Honor X80 Pro Max; the manufacturer announced some time ago that security patches would be provided for at least 2 years for all devices—which isn’t exactly a long time.
There is no information regarding sustainability.
Cameras – Single on the back
The Honor X80 Pro Max also breaks new ground with its camera system: By 2026, a single rear camera might be common on tablets, but it’s actually no longer typical for smartphones.
The main camera features a 50-megapixel sensor, producing fairly sharp photos that, however, appear to have been heavily post-processed.
There are no wide-angle or telephoto cameras, so only a digital zoom of up to 10x is available. The zoom quality is acceptable thanks to AI enhancements.
The front camera takes decent selfies, but you shouldn’t zoom in too much, or the lack of detail will become noticeable.
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
PlantSurroundingLow Light

Display – Bright AMOLED
The Honor phone’s AMOLED screen can display up to 120 frames per second and offers a fairly high resolution for its price range.
The main focus is on brightness, which, according to Honor, is said to reach up to 10,000 cd/m² in HDR mode. We didn’t quite reach that level in our tests, but 5,358 cd/m² is still extremely high. In everyday use, the screen can also get very bright at 1,828 cd/m², which is sufficient for outdoor use. Color reproduction is also very accurate.
However, you’ll have to put up with PWM flicker; we measured a fairly low frequency of around 60 Hz.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Center on Battery: 1828 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 0.73 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.7}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.1 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.95}
98.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.222
CCT: 6734 K
| Honor X80 Pro Max AMOLED, 2788x1280, 6.8" | Honor Magic8 Lite OLED, 2640x1200, 6.8" | Gigaset GS6 Pro AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7" | Motorola Moto G87 AMOLED, 2772x1272, 6.8" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 2% | -68% | 17% | |
| APL18 Peak Brightness (cd/m²) | 1922 | 1785 -7% | 926 -52% | 3463 80% |
| HDR Peak Brightness (cd/m²) | 5358 | 5962 11% | 922 -83% | 2845 -47% |
| Response Times | 68% | 61% | 59% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 8.9 ? | 0.68 ? 92% | 1.2 ? 87% | 3.1 ? 65% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 18.5 ? | 1.07 ? 94% | 1.07 ? 94% | 3.1 ? 83% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 60 | 60 | 485 | 361.6 |
| PWM Amplitude * (%) | 18 | 14.56 19% | 17.65 2% | 13 28% |
| Screen | -74% | -256% | -60% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 1828 | 1754 -4% | 810 -56% | 1850 1% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | ||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 0.73 | 1.5 -105% | 4.5 -516% | 1.21 -66% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.1 | 3.5 -67% | 6.8 -224% | 4.01 -91% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.1 | 2.4 -118% | 3.6 -227% | 2 -82% |
| Gamma | 2.222 99% | 2.27 97% | 2.25 98% | 2.229 99% |
| CCT | 6734 97% | 6358 102% | 7131 91% | 6439 101% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 1748 | 1813 | ||
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 98 | 96 | ||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -1% /
-9% | -88% /
-108% | 5% /
-3% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 60 Hz Amplitude: 18 % | ||
The display backlight flickers at 60 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 60 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7659 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Series of measurements with a fixed zoom level and different brightness settings (Although the amplitude curve appears flat at minimum brightness, this is due to the scaling. The info box shows a magnified version of the amplitude at minimum brightness.)
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 18.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.1 ms rise | |
| ↘ 17.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 42 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (19.7 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 8.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 8.5 ms rise | |
| ↘ 0.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.13 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (30.8 ms). | ||
Performance, emissions, and battery life – Progress and regression
In some respects, the Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 5 is a step backward compared to the previous generation; for example, it features an older processor architecture. In everyday use, the processor usually has enough power and can handle simple tasks quite easily. The UFS 3.1 storage can transfer data quickly.
The heat on the case is definitely noticeable, but it does not affect the processor’s performance: It remains stable in all 3DMark stress tests.
The speaker on the bottom edge is complemented by the earpiece. The speakers can get reasonably loud and produce a fairly balanced sound, though it lacks bass. The most important codecs are available for wireless audio transmission.
The battery is certainly one of the highlights of the Honor X80 Pro Max: 11,000 mAh in a relatively slim body is a rare find. In our Wi-Fi test, the phone achieved runtimes of over 29 hours, significantly outperforming most other phones. This means it easily lasts two days even with more intensive use. If you use the battery sparingly, you can get significantly more runtime.
You can charge the phone at up to 90 watts, but due to the massive battery capacity, a full charge still takes over two hours.
| Honor X80 Pro Max | Honor Magic8 Lite | Gigaset GS6 Pro | Motorola Moto G87 | Average 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -2% | -46% | -44% | -17% | -1% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s) | 2001.1 | 1948.54 -3% | 983.23 -51% | 987.6 -51% | 1877 ? -6% | 2283 ? 14% |
| Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s) | 1852 | 1828.13 -1% | 823.09 -56% | 701.3 -62% | 1397 ? -25% | 1965 ? 6% |
| Random Read 4KB (MB/s) | 365.2 | 344.19 -6% | 232.28 -36% | 224.6 -38% | 290 ? -21% | 316 ? -13% |
| Random Write 4KB (MB/s) | 409.5 | 412.87 1% | 243.83 -40% | 302.6 -26% | 344 ? -16% | 362 ? -12% |
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.2 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.7 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
3DMark Stress Tests
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Honor X80 Pro Max | |
| Honor Magic8 Lite | |
| Motorola Moto G87 | |
| Gigaset GS6 Pro | |
| Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
| Honor X80 Pro Max | |
| Honor Magic8 Lite | |
| Motorola Moto G87 | |
| Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability | |
| Honor X80 Pro Max | |
| Honor Magic8 Lite | |
| Gigaset GS6 Pro | |
Honor X80 Pro Max audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 62.7% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 62.7% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 62.7% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (135.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 100% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 34%, worst was 136%
Compared to all devices tested
» 100% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%
Honor Magic8 Lite audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 34%, worst was 136%
Compared to all devices tested
» 31% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%
| Off / Standby | |
| Idle | |
Key:
min: | |
| Honor X80 Pro Max 11000 mAh | Honor Magic8 Lite 7500 mAh | Gigaset GS6 Pro 5300 mAh | Motorola Moto G87 5200 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 5 | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -59% | 43% | 0% | 6% | ||
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 1.1 | 1.36 -24% | 0.55 50% | 1.1 ? -0% | 0.878 ? 20% | |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 1.2 | 2.68 -123% | 0.9 25% | 1.2 ? -0% | 1.46 ? -22% | |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 2.1 | 2.76 -31% | 0.98 53% | 2.1 ? -0% | 1.655 ? 21% |
* ... smaller is better
| Honor X80 Pro Max 11000 mAh | Honor Magic8 Lite 7500 mAh | Gigaset GS6 Pro 5300 mAh | Motorola Moto G87 5200 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | -21% | -45% | -40% | |
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 29.1 | 23 -21% | 15.9 -45% | 17.4 -40% |
| Reader / Idle (h) | 34.2 | |||
| Load (h) | 5.1 |
Notebookcheck Overall Rating
Honor X80 Pro Max
- 09/10/2026 v8
Florian Schmitt
Comparison of Possible Alternatives
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Honor X80 Pro Max Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 5 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 812 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 3.1 | Amazon: 1. $1,259.00 HONOR Magic8 Pro Dual-SIM 51... 2. $1,230.00 HONOR Magic8 Pro Dual-SIM 51... 3. $505.00 XIAOMI Poco X8 PRO MAX 5G Ai... List Price: 397€ | 203 g | 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.80" 2788x1280 451 PPI AMOLED | |
| Honor Magic8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 810 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 3.1 | List Price: 400€ | 189 g | 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.79" 2640x1200 427 PPI OLED | |
| Gigaset GS6 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 7300 ⎘ ARM Mali-G57 MP2 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.2 | List Price: 449€ | 230 g | 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.67" 2400x1080 395 PPI AMOLED | |
| Motorola Moto G87 Mediatek Dimensity 6400 ⎘ ARM Mali-G57 MP2 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.2 | List Price: 400€ | 183 g | 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.78" 2772x1272 450 PPI AMOLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.


































