Notebookcheck Logo

Xiaomi 13 Lite review: Classy mid-range smartphone with an ambitious price tag

Premium value? The Xiaomi 13 Lite is the cheapest smartphone in the Xiaomi 13 series, but still costs up to EUR 500. In return, the 6.55-inch device attempts to win over buyers with features such as a dual selfie camera and a 1000 nits bright rounded display, and is the first EU smartphone with Snapdragon 7 Gen 1. We put the smartphone through its paces.
Xiaomi 13 Lite

Xiaomi has presented its new generation of smartphones. The Xiaomi 13 series replaces the 12th series of last year and is currently available in three versions. In addition to the Xiaomi 13 and the Xiaomi 13 Pro, the manufacturer also offers a Lite version, the Xiaomi 13 Lite. Officially priced around US$450, it is the cheapest iteration of the series and thus differs significantly from the prices of its sister models, the Xiaomi 13 (~US$850) and Xiaomi 13 Pro (~US$1080).

The Xiaomi 13 Lite is technically similar to the Xiaomi 12 Lite in many respects and also falls in the middle class. Only a few major changes have been made, such as the camera setup, for the 108 MP main camera of the Xiaomi 12 Lite has been replaced by a 50 MP camera. In return, the front camera now sees double with its 32 MP main sensor now supported by an 8 MP depth sensor, which should ensure better bokeh effects. The battery capacity has also increased and is now 4500 mAh instead of the old 4300 mAh.

Xiaomi 13 Lite (13 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 8 x 1.8 - 2.4 GHz, Cortex-A710 / A510
Graphics adapter
Memory
8 GB 
, LPDDR4X
Display
6.55 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 402 PPI, capacitive, AMOLED, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Touch sampling rate 240 Hz, up to 1000 nits, 500 Nits typ., glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 256 GB 
, 222.9 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Proximity sensor, Ambient light sensor, Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Electronic compass, Linear motor, IR blaster, VoLTE, VoWiFi, Dolby Atmos, DRM Widevine L1, Camera2 API Level 3
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G (Band 2/3/5/8), 3G (Band 1/2/4/5/6/8/19), 4G (Band 1/2/3/4/5/7/8/12/13/17/18/19/20/26/28/32/38/40/41/42/66), 5G (Band 1/3/5/7/8/20/28/38/40/41/66/77/78); eSIM support, Head SAR 0.994 W/kg, Body SAR 0.998 W/kg, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.23 x 159.2 x 72.7 ( = 0.28 x 6.27 x 2.86 in)
Battery
4500 mAh Lithium-Ion
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 12
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (Sony IMX766, 1/1.56" sensor size, 1.0 µm pixel size, f/1.8, AF, 86° FOV) + 8 MP Ultra wide camera (1.12 µm pixel size, f/2.2, 119° FOV) + 2 MP Macro camera (f/2.4, fixed focus); videos up to 4K@30fps, 1080p@60fps
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix Dual: 32 MP Ultra-wide angle camera (1/2.74" sensor size, 0.8 μm pixel size, f/2.4) + 8 MP Depth sensor (1.12 μm pixel size, f/2.28)
Additional features
Speakers: single, Keyboard: virtual, 67W charger, USB Type-C Cable, SIM Eject Tool, Protective Case, Quick Start Guide, Warranty Card, Safety information, MIUI 14, 12 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
171 g ( = 6.03 oz / 0.38 pounds), Power Supply: 97 g ( = 3.42 oz / 0.21 pounds)
Price
500 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible competitors in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
86.4 %
04/2023
Xiaomi 13 Lite
SD 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644
171 g256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.55"2400x1080
85.8 %
09/2022
Google Pixel 6a
Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20
178 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.10"2400x1080
87.9 %
03/2022
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730
196 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"2400x1080
85.6 %
07/2022
Nothing Phone (1)
SD 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L
193.5 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.55"2400x1080
83.4 %
06/2022
Samsung Galaxy A53
Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4
189 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.50"2400x1080
85.6 %
09/2022
Xiaomi 12 Lite
SD 778G 5G, Adreno 642L
173 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.55"2400x1080

Case - Curved display and glass back

Compared to the low-priced smartphones of the Redmi and Poco series, one immediately notices that the Xiaomi 13 Lite belongs to a higher quality series. At 171 grams, the Xiaomi 13 Lite is a tad lighter than its predecessor and also feels very good to hold due to its unchanged slim design.

Thanks to its glass back, the 7.3 millimeter flat smartphone feels pleasing in the hands and thus scores additional plus points compared to the Xiaomi 12 Lite, which had to make do with a plastic back cover. Since the glass back is very susceptible to fingerprints, we recommend using the smartphone in the supplied transparent protective case. This also prevents wobbling on flat surfaces, which is otherwise unavoidable due to the camera module protruding around 2.5 millimeters from the chassis.

In contrast to the Xiaomi 12 Lite, the Gorilla Glass 5 protected AMOLED display is rounded on the long sides, which is why the display-to-surface ratio is slightly better at 89 percent (Xiaomi 12 Lite: 88%). Because the front camera has two lenses, the camera notch has widened significantly and resembles the "Dynamic Island" of the iPhone 14 Pro models with its pill-shaped outline, which may not appeal to everyone. A protective film is applied to the curved display ex factory.

As with the Xiaomi 12 Lite, the frame of the Xiaomi 13 Lite is made of plastic and holds the front and back together sturdily. Creaking noises can be heard if the slim smartphone is twisted sideways with minimal effort. The display and back cover, on the other hand, prove to be very stable under pressure and can hardly be pressed in.

The Xiaomi 13 Lite is available in three color variants, namely "Lite blue" (like our test device), "Lite pink" and "Lite black".

Xiaom 13 Lite
Xiaom 13 Lite
Xiaom 13 Lite
Xiaom 13 Lite
Xiaom 13 Lite
Xiaom 13 Lite
Xiaom 13 Lite
Xiaom 13 Lite
Xiaom 13 Lite
Xiaom 13 Lite

Size comparison

163.1 mm / 6.42 in 76 mm / 2.99 in 8.8 mm / 0.3465 in 196 g0.4321 lbs159.6 mm / 6.28 in 74.8 mm / 2.94 in 8.1 mm / 0.3189 in 189 g0.4167 lbs159.2 mm / 6.27 in 75.8 mm / 2.98 in 8.3 mm / 0.3268 in 193.5 g0.4266 lbs159.3 mm / 6.27 in 73.7 mm / 2.9 in 7.29 mm / 0.287 in 173 g0.3814 lbs159.2 mm / 6.27 in 72.7 mm / 2.86 in 7.23 mm / 0.2846 in 171 g0.377 lbs152.2 mm / 5.99 in 71.8 mm / 2.83 in 8.9 mm / 0.3504 in 178 g0.3924 lbs148 mm / 5.83 in 105 mm / 4.13 in 1 mm / 0.03937 in 1.5 g0.00331 lbs

Equipment - 8 GB RAM and up to 256 GB memory

Xiaomi officially offers the 13 Lite in the EU in only one storage variant: 8 GB of LPDDR4X RAM and 128 GB of UFS 2.2 storage for EUR 400-500, depending on location. Online, you can easily buy the second storage variant, which also offers 8 GB RAM and 256 GB storage space and is hardly more expensive. The smartphone does not have a microSD slot for memory expansion.

In addition to an infrared transmitter for devices such as cameras and home cinema devices, there is NFC, Bluetooth 5.2 and an OTG-capable USB-C port that works at USB 2.0 speed. However, the stereo speakers of the Xiaomi 12 Lite are no longer available on the successor. Instead, the Xiaomi 13 Lite has to make do with a single speaker located next to the USB-C port.

Left: no ports
Left: no ports
Right: power button, volume rocker switch
Right: power button, volume rocker switch
Top: microphone, IR sensor
Top: microphone, IR sensor
Bottom: SIM slot (2x Nano SIM), microphone, USB-C 2.0, speaker
Bottom: SIM slot (2x Nano SIM), microphone, USB-C 2.0, speaker

Software - Android 12 and MIUI 14

The Xiaomi 13 Lite runs Android 12 and version 14 of Xiaomi's in-house MIUI user interface. According to Xiaomi, the smartphone will receive three OS upgrades and four years worth of security updates. At the time of review (end of March), the Android security patch were from January 1, 2023 and therefore no longer particularly up to date.

In addition to the obligatory Google apps and some of the manufacturer's own tools such as File Manager, Mi Remote Control and Xiaomi Community, some third-party apps are also installed on the Xiaomi 13 Lite. But if you don't need Audible, Bing, Booking.com, Facebook, TikTok, Spotify and others, these can be simply uninstalled. 

Xiaom 13 Lite
Xiaom 13 Lite
Xiaom 13 Lite
Xiaom 13 Lite
Xiaom 13 Lite
Xiaom 13 Lite
Xiaom 13 Lite
Xiaom 13 Lite

Communication and GNSS - Very fast WiFi 6E & precise GPS

The Xiaomi 13 Lite supports all current mobile phone standards, including 5G-Sub6. Owing to broad frequency coverage, which includes 13 5G and 21 4G bands, the smartphone should have little issue connecting to the mobile network at most locations.

Regarding WLAN, the Xiaomi 13 connects to WiFi networks via WiFi 6. Although it cannot communicate via the 6 GHz band, it is still very fast on account of the 160 MHz spectrum.

In tandem with our Asus ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 reference router, the smartphone achieves stable and, above all, excellent transfer rates, which peak at 1757 MBit/s. In doing so, the Xiaomi 13 clearly surpasses its predecessor. Other mid-range competitors, such as the Google Pixel 6a and the Samsung Galaxy A53, cannot keep up with the Xiaomi 13 Lite in the Wi-Fi test.

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1440 (1312min - 1540max) MBit/s
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
933 (833min - 949max) MBit/s -35%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
897 (449min - 907max) MBit/s -38%
Average of class Smartphone
  (34.8 - 1875, n=197, last 2 years)
664 MBit/s -54%
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
633 (204min - 699max) MBit/s -56%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
345 (328min - 351max) MBit/s -76%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1757 (1611min - 1817max) MBit/s
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
976 (863min - 1003max) MBit/s -44%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
946 (459min - 973max) MBit/s -46%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
898 (852min - 931max) MBit/s -49%
Average of class Smartphone
  (40.5 - 1810, n=198, last 2 years)
698 MBit/s -60%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
269 (255min - 281max) MBit/s -85%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Average of class Smartphone
  (229 - 1894, n=61, last 2 years)
1529 MBit/s
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
946 (926min - 951max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Average of class Smartphone
  (598 - 1844, n=61, last 2 years)
1364 MBit/s
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
598 (517min - 731max) MBit/s
095190285380475570665760855950104511401235133014251520161517101805Tooltip
Xiaomi 13 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 644; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1440 (1312-1540)
Xiaomi 12 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 642L; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø626 (204-699)
Xiaomi 13 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 644; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1757 (1611-1817)
Xiaomi 12 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 642L; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø976 (863-1003)
GPS-Empfang im Gebäude
GPS-Empfang im Gebäude
GPS-Empfang im Freien
GPS-Empfang im Freien

Localization of the Xiaomi 13 Lite takes place via GPS (L1), Glonass (L1), Galileo (E1) and Beidou (B1, B1C). This functions very swifly both indoors and outdoors at an accuracy of 3 meters.

We also tested the smartphone's real world tracking capabilities on a 10-kilometer bike ride, also taking the Garmin Venu2 fitness tracker along for direct comparison. The smartphone does its job very well, recording the route covered almost as precisely, aside from minimal outliers, and is thus ideally equipped for everyday navigation tasks à la Google Maps.

GPS test: summary
GPS test: summary
GPS test: Around the lake
GPS test: Around the lake
GPS test: loop
GPS test: loop

Telephony and Voice Quality

The Xiaomi 13 Lite supports VoLTE as well as Wi-Fi calls and can use two nano-SIM cards as well as one nano-SIM card together with an eSIM.

Under testing, the Xiaomi 13 Lite delivered good voice quality. The voices of the callers were reproduced clearly and naturally, and distracting background noise was suppressed quite reliably. In hands-free mode, a slight echo crept in from time to time, but the otherwise good intelligibility remained so.

Cameras - Dual selfie camera and Sony IMX766 with 50 MP

Photo with the selfie camera
Photo with the selfie camera

The Xiaomi 13 Lite uses a dual front camera consisting of a 32 MP selfie camera and an 8 MP depth sensor. This also explains the notch format, which is unusual by Android standards because it is pill-shaped, as it now houses two sensors instead of the usual one.

The selfies make appear decent in good lighting conditions and the 100° viewing angle means that several people can be included in the picture. The 8 MP sensor is responsible for depth information in portrait mode. Under testing, however, it does not really deliver any added value compared to standard selfie cameras.

On paper, the camera setup is a step backwards: Xiaomi omits the 108 MP main sensor of the Xiaomi 12 Lite (Samsung HM2) and installs the well-known Sony IMX766, which has a resolution of 50 MP and shoots 12 MP photos via 4-in-1 pixels. If you want full resolution, you can switch to the 50 MP picture mode.

Megapixel specs say little about the image quality, which is also evident in our tests. The main camera of the Xiaomi 13 Lite has to make do with less than half the MP number of the Xiaomi 12 Lite, but takes better pictures both in daylight and in poor light conditions and is thus far ahead in the mid-range range.

The Sony IMX766 captures contrasts and colors well. The colors fade somewhat in low residual light, but the level of detail is still above average, which is particularly noticeable in direct comparison with the Xiaomi 12 Lite. On the other hand, the main camera delivers only average quality in zoom shots, since photos no longer look very crisp at more than 2x magnification. The maximum zoom level is 10x.

The 8 MP ultra wide-angle camera and the 2 MP macro camera fall behind the 50 MP main sensor in terms of quality. The former does its job quite well, but struggles with blurring towards the edges. The macro camera hardly has any added value owing to its low resolution.

Videos are recorded in a maximum of 4K at 30 frames per second, while up to 60 FPS is possible with Full HD. The recordings are impressive and are reliably stable. 

Photo with the main camera
Photo with the main camera
Photo with the main camera
Photo with the main camera
Photo with the ultra-wide-angle lens
Photo with the ultra-wide-angle lens
Photo with the main camera
Photo with the main camera
Photo with the main camera
Photo with the main camera
Photo with the main camera
Photo with the main camera

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Daylight photo 1Daylight photo 2Ultra wide angle5x zoomLow light

Under controlled lighting conditions, the Sony IMX766 of the Xiaomi 13 Lite reproduces colors reasonably realistically. However, the sensor struggles to accurately capture the cyan, darker brown and green tones. The main camera reproduces the test chart in detail, but still shows blurring towards the edges of the image. On the other hand, the test chart is still fully visible even at 1 lux of residual light.

ColorChecker
25.2 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
20.6 ∆E
30.2 ∆E
17.7 ∆E
11 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
18.8 ∆E
17.8 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
17 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
12 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
1.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi 13 Lite: 13.45 ∆E min: 1.21 - max: 30.24 ∆E
ColorChecker
28.6 ∆E
47.4 ∆E
36.8 ∆E
33.9 ∆E
42.6 ∆E
56.1 ∆E
47.1 ∆E
30.1 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
27.6 ∆E
58.4 ∆E
59.7 ∆E
27 ∆E
42.8 ∆E
29.1 ∆E
67.4 ∆E
37.9 ∆E
38.9 ∆E
63.8 ∆E
63.8 ∆E
49 ∆E
35.9 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi 13 Lite: 41.53 ∆E min: 13.91 - max: 67.45 ∆E

Accessories and Warranty - 67 watt power supply unit included in the scope of delivery

The included 67 watt power supply unit.
The included 67 watt power supply unit.

The scope of delivery of the Xiaomi 13 Pro includes a 67-watt power supply, a transparent protective cover, a USB cable (type A to C), a SIM tool, a quick start guide and another leaflet with safety instructions.

Xiaomi provides a 12-month warranty on its smartphone in the EU. This may differ in non-EU countries, so be sure to check with your vendor before purchasing.

Input Devices & Operation - Fingerprint sensor with heart rate monitor

The capacitive touchscreen of the Xiaomi 13 Lite works at a touch sampling rate of 240 Hz, reacts quickly to inputs and also implements them precisely. Together with a refresh rate of up to 120 Hz, this makes for nice and smooth operation.

The optical fingerprint sensor located under the display unlocks the Xiaomi 13 Lite quickly and reliably. Alternatively, biometric authentication is possible via the less secure 2D facial recognition method. Another plus point is the Always-on display, which can be switched on at any time and can permanently display elements such as the time, date and battery level.

A one-handed mode can also be activated under Additional settings. There is also the option of measuring the heart rate via a fingerprint sensor. A measurement takes 15 seconds.

Keyboard in portrait mode
Keyboard in portrait mode
Keyboard in landscape mode
Keyboard in landscape mode

Display - AMOLED panel with 1000 nits

Subpixel matrix
Subpixel matrix

The 6.55-inch AMOLED display of the Xiaomi 13 Lite has a resolution of 2400 x 1080 pixels, which ostensibly makes it no different from the Xiaomi 12 Lite. The refresh rate, which is up to 120 Hz depending on the content displayed, and support for all common HDR standards (Dolby Vision HDR10, HDR10+ and HLG) have also remained the same.

Compared to its predecessor, however, the AMOLED display has increased in terms of brightness. It averages 903.6 cd/m², which is even higher than the Xiaomi 12 Lite, where we measured an average of 772.9 cd/m².

With evenly distributed bright and dark image areas (APL18 measurement), the Xiaomi 13 Lite increases to a maximum of 1036 cd/m². A maximum of 516 cd/m² is possible when the brightness sensor is switched off. At the lowest brightness level, the luminance is 1.89 cd/m².

As in most smartphones with OLED panels, the display of the Xiaomi 13 Pro also flickers. Then again, because Xiaomi uses an eye-friendly DC dimming method at 1920 Hz, users who otherwise react sensitively to pulse width modulation should not be bothered by this.

Xiaomi's special DC dimming process, at a constant 120 Hz, is noticeable across the entire brightness spectrum on our oscilloscope. Small outliers can be seen in the 71-421 Hz frequency range.

900
cd/m²
902
cd/m²
906
cd/m²
900
cd/m²
905
cd/m²
903
cd/m²
908
cd/m²
905
cd/m²
903
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 908 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 903.6 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 99 %
Center on Battery: 905 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.99
ΔE Greyscale 2.2 | 0.57-98 Ø5.2
97.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.23
Xiaomi 13 Lite
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.55
Google Pixel 6a
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.10
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.70
Nothing Phone (1)
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.55
Samsung Galaxy A53
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.50
Xiaomi 12 Lite
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.55
Screen
3%
-2%
-7%
-23%
-15%
Brightness middle
905
758
-16%
649
-28%
620
-31%
718
-21%
757
-16%
Brightness
904
767
-15%
649
-28%
625
-31%
730
-19%
773
-14%
Brightness Distribution
99
93
-6%
98
-1%
98
-1%
92
-7%
97
-2%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1
0.9
10%
1.18
-18%
1.24
-24%
1.62
-62%
1.3
-30%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3
2.5
17%
2.07
31%
2.31
23%
4.21
-40%
3.4
-13%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.2
1.6
27%
1.5
32%
1.7
23%
2
9%
2.5
-14%
Gamma
2.23 99%
2.2 100%
2.236 98%
2.318 95%
2.156 102%
2.22 99%
CCT
6382 102%
6599 98%
2538 256%
6325 103%
6545 99%
6403 102%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 120 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17708 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Minimum display brightness
Min.
25% display brightness
25%
50% display brightness
50%
75% display brightness
75%
Maximum manual display brightness
100%

Series of measurements at a fixed zoom level and different brightness settings

The AMOLED display of the Xiaomi 13 Lite delivers very precise color representation. This can be brought about by switching from the standard color scheme, Vivid, to Original Color. The panel then delivers exemplary color reproduction with DeltaE values of well under 3, although it only uses the sRGB color space. In the standard Vivid setting, on the other hand, the much larger DCI-P3 color space is used.

Color fidelity (color scheme: Original Color, target color space: sRGB)
Color fidelity (color scheme: Original Color, target color space: sRGB)
Color space (color scheme: Original Color, target color space: sRGB)
Color space (color scheme: Original Color, target color space: sRGB)
Grayscale (color scheme: Original Color, target color space: sRGB)
Grayscale (color scheme: Original Color, target color space: sRGB)
Color saturation (color scheme: Original Color, target color space: sRGB)
Color saturation (color scheme: Original Color, target color space: sRGB)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
1.22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.671 ms rise
↘ 0.5445 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.4 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.25 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.5935 ms rise
↘ 0.6525 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.6 ms).

The Xiaomi 13 Lite performs very well outdoors thanks to its viewing angle stable and bright AMOLED panel. Even on sunny days, it still has enough brightness reserves to ensure good readability. Optionally, you can deactivate the auto-brightness in the display settings and switch on a sunlight mode instead to squeeze out the maximum brightness from the panel.

Outdoor use (cloudy sky, auto brightness)
Outdoor use (cloudy sky, auto brightness)
Outdoor use (cloudy sky, auto brightness)
Outdoor use (cloudy sky, auto brightness)
Outdoor use (in the sun, auto brightness)
Outdoor use (in the sun, auto brightness)
Viewing angle stability
Viewing angle stability

Performance - Premiere for the Snapdragon 7 Gen 1

The Xiaomi 13 Lite is the first smartphone in Germany to be equipped with the Snapdragon 7 Gen 1. The mid-range SoC uses four ARM Cortex-A710 performance cores with clock frequencies of up to 2.4 GHz and an efficiency cluster consisting of four Cortex-A510 cores with a clock frequency of 1.8 GHz. According to ARM, the performance cores are 10 percent faster and 35 percent more efficient than the Cortex-A78 cores. The efficiency cores are said to be 35 percent more powerful and 20 percent more efficient than the old Cortex-A55 cores.

The Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 delivers good mid-range performance in our tests. In the synthetic benchmarks, however, the performance advantage over the Snapdragon 778G 5G of the Xiaomi 12 Lite is quite small. The Google Tensor in the Google Pixel 6a and the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 in the Motorola Edge 30 Pro are in a higher league, as expected.

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1195 Points +51%
Google Pixel 6a
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144
1025 Points +30%
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 2138, n=201, last 2 years)
918 Points +16%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
824 Points +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
  (775 - 826, n=4)
793 Points 0%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
791 Points
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
783 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
740 Points -6%
Multi-Core
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
3659 Points +26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6681, n=201, last 2 years)
3039 Points +5%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
2998 Points +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
  (2854 - 3094, n=4)
2943 Points +2%
Google Pixel 6a
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144
2940 Points +2%
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
2932 Points +1%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
2894 Points
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
1878 Points -35%
Geekbench 6.0
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (188 - 2531, n=44, last 2 years)
1279 Points +37%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
934 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
  ()
934 Points 0%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (512 - 6460, n=44, last 2 years)
3412 Points +33%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
2571 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
  ()
2571 Points 0%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
970465 Points +67%
Average of class Smartphone
  (102602 - 1650926, n=138, last 2 years)
765421 Points +32%
Google Pixel 6a
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144
715338 Points +23%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
582264 Points 0%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
581838 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
  (544011 - 593635, n=5)
568349 Points -2%
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
516991 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
409976 Points -30%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
13611 Points +14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 21385, n=200, last 2 years)
11960 Points +1%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
11890 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
  (10389 - 12632, n=6)
11853 Points 0%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
11662 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
11470 Points -4%
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
11461 Points -4%
Google Pixel 6a
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144
9717 Points -18%
CrossMark - Overall
Google Pixel 6a
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144
865 Points +31%
Average of class Smartphone
  (200 - 1474, n=158, last 2 years)
852 Points +29%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
760 Points +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
  (662 - 704, n=5)
683 Points +3%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
662 Points
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
658 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
579 Points -13%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
7070 Points +56%
Average of class Smartphone
  (411 - 11438, n=155, last 2 years)
5955 Points +31%
Google Pixel 6a
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144
5950 Points +31%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
4768 Points +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
  (4296 - 4805, n=6)
4653 Points +3%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
4539 Points
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
4314 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
3626 Points -20%
System
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
10739 Points +22%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
10424 Points +18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2376 - 16475, n=155, last 2 years)
9867 Points +12%
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
9517 Points +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
  (8634 - 10293, n=6)
9495 Points +8%
Google Pixel 6a
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144
9109 Points +4%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
8797 Points
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
7157 Points -19%
Memory
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
7357 Points +68%
Google Pixel 6a
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144
6592 Points +50%
Average of class Smartphone
  (670 - 12716, n=155, last 2 years)
6465 Points +47%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
4763 Points +9%
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
4602 Points +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
  (3640 - 4970, n=6)
4533 Points +3%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
4385 Points
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
3855 Points -12%
Graphics
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
17159 Points +125%
Average of class Smartphone
  (697 - 58651, n=155, last 2 years)
15040 Points +98%
Google Pixel 6a
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144
14148 Points +86%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
8175 Points +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
  (7612 - 8150, n=6)
7747 Points +2%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
7612 Points
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
6681 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
5178 Points -32%
Web
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1843 Points +28%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2145, n=155, last 2 years)
1528 Points +6%
Google Pixel 6a
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144
1476 Points +2%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
1445 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
  (1330 - 1525, n=6)
1413 Points -2%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
1273 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
1210 Points -16%
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
1184 Points -18%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
29413 Points
Google Pixel 6a
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144
21639 Points -26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (207 - 84787, n=144, last 2 years)
21310 Points -28%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
20784 Points -29%
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
18855 Points -36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
  (7374 - 29413, n=5)
12886 Points -56%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
4239 Points -86%
AImark - Score v3.x
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
44527 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
  (668 - 47384, n=4)
34697 Points -22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (298 - 245629, n=111, last 2 years)
17287 Points -61%

For graphics acceleration, the SoC uses the Adreno 644 GPU, which is said to be around 20 percent faster than the pixel accelerator integrated in the Snapdragon 778G 5G. In the synthetic benchmarks, the Xiaomi 13 Lite performs better than the Xiaomi 12 Lite, but the performance advantage is not significant, like in the synthetic benchmarks.

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1626 Points +96%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1567 Points +89%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
829 Points
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
686 Points -17%
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
684 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
621 Points -25%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2040 Points +143%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1629 Points +94%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
838 Points
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
692 Points -17%
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
687 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
636 Points -24%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7261 Points +139%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6483 Points +114%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3035 Points
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2576 Points -15%
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2483 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2275 Points -25%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6695 Points +116%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6351 Points +105%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3095 Points
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2570 Points -17%
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2468 Points -20%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2293 Points -26%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3335 Points
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2854 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2689 Points -19%
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2550 Points -24%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points -100%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6053 Points
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5412 Points -11%
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5277 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3902 Points -36%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points -100%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5125 Points
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4513 Points -12%
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4264 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3546 Points -31%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points -100%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4833 Points +45%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4518 Points +36%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4277 Points +29%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3325 Points
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3097 Points -7%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8957 Points +32%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6767 Points
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5759 Points -15%
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5577 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3982 Points -41%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7205 Points +31%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5501 Points
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5428 Points -1%
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5393 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3746 Points -32%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps +5%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
113 fps 0%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
113 fps
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
108 fps -4%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
81 fps -28%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -47%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
306 fps +108%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
252 fps +71%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
147 fps
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
141 fps -4%
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
133 fps -10%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
92 fps -37%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps +57%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
76 fps
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
74 fps -3%
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
68 fps -11%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -21%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
56 fps -26%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
158 fps +80%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
151 fps +72%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
88 fps
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
82 fps -7%
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
77 fps -12%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
61 fps -31%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
109 fps +85%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps +2%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
59 fps
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
58 fps -2%
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
49 fps -17%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
35 fps -41%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps +89%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
100 fps +59%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
64 fps +2%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
63 fps
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
56 fps -11%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
38 fps -40%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
68 fps +100%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
54 fps +59%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
34 fps
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
33 fps -3%
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
28 fps -18%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
20 fps -41%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
86 fps +132%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
52 fps +41%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
37 fps 0%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
37 fps
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
33 fps -11%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
23 fps -38%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps +150%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
39 fps +63%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
24 fps
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
22 fps -8%
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
20 fps -17%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
15 fps -37%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
42 fps +163%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
28 fps +75%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
16 fps
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
15 fps -6%
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
14 fps -12%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
10 fps -37%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98 fps +151%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
43 fps +10%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
39 fps
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
36 fps -8%
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
33 fps -15%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
23 fps -41%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
101 fps +120%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
58 fps +26%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
46 fps
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
40 fps -13%
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
38 fps -17%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
26 fps -43%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
14 fps +92%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
7.3 fps
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6.7 fps -8%
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6.1 fps -16%

Basemark GPUScore