Notebookcheck Logo

Xiaomi 13 review - Compact powerhouse with Leica camera

Small yet powerful. The Xiaomi 13 is one of the most compact high-end phones and features the latest Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 and a camera module developed in cooperation with Leica. Read our review to find out whether this combination works out well.
(Photo: Daniel Schmidt/notebookcheck.com)

The Xiaomi 13 is the follow-up to last year's Xiaomi 12 and stays true to the series by being a compact high-end smartphone. The display on the 13 is only marginally larger. And as expected, the phone once again features Qualcomm's latest flagship SoC – this time around the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2.

Whilst the device shares a lot of the same specs as its predecessor, Xiaomi has completely revamped the camera setup. We are referring not just to the cooperation with Leica, but also to the sensors. Besides having a new main sensor, the camera module is now equipped an optical zoom lens rather than a dedicated macro lens. 

Our review unit is an import version from China. The international version of the Xiaomi 13 is expected to arrive in March (see our news coverage in German) and will reportedly cost €999 (US$1073). If you decide to purchase an import model, the phone can be had for much lower than €800 (US$860) from retailers.

Xiaomi 13 (13 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 8 x 2 - 3.2 GHz, Cortex-X3 / A715 / A710 / A510 (Kryo)
Graphics adapter
Memory
8 GB 
, LPDDR5x
Display
6.36 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 414 PPI, capacitive, 240Hz touch sampling rate, OLED, 8-bit, LTPO 4.0, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 256 GB 
, 224.5 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Proximity, G-sensor, accelerometer, electronical compass, rotation, flicker sensor, IR blaster, OTG
Networking
Wi-Fi 7 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.3, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19), LTE (Band 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42), 5G-Sub6 (Band 1, 3, 5, 8, 28a, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.98 x 152.8 x 71.5 ( = 0.31 x 6.02 x 2.81 in)
Battery
4500 mAh Lithium-Ion
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 13
Camera
Primary Camera: 54 MPix (effective 50 MP, Sony IMX800, 1/1.49", 1.0 µm, 23 mm, f/1.8, HyperOIS) 12 MP (ultrawide, f/2.2) 10 MP (optical zoom, 1/3.75", 1.0 µm, 75 mm, f/2.0, OIS); 8K video, Camera2 API: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix (89.6°, 1.4 µm, 5P, f/2.0), 1080p video
Additional features
Speakers: Dual, Keyboard: On-screen, 67W charger, USB cable, SIM ejector tool, silicone case, MIUI 14, 12 Months Warranty, SAR: -; DRM Widevine L1, GNSS: GPS (L1, L5), Glonass (L1), BeiDou (B1, B1c, B2a), Galileo (E1, E5a), QZSS (L1, L5), NavIC (L5), fanless, waterproof
Weight
189 g ( = 6.67 oz / 0.42 pounds), Power Supply: 134 g ( = 4.73 oz / 0.3 pounds)
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Comparison with possible competitors

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
89.1 %
02/2023
Xiaomi 13
SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740
189 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.36"2400x1080
89.3 %
05/2022
Samsung Galaxy S22
Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920
167 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.10"2340x1080
89.3 %
10/2022
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730
198.5 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.67"2400x1080
89.1 %
11/2022
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7
212 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"3120x1440
89.2 %
04/2022
Oppo Find X5 Pro
SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730
221 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"3216x1440
90.3 %
01/2023
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16, A16 GPU 5-Core
206 g256 GB NVMe6.10"2556x1179

Case - Glass and aluminium design feels great in the hand

The Xiaomi 13 is available in a host of colours on the Chinese market: black, white, blue (pleather finish) and jade green, which is the colour of our review unit. In China, the company is also offering limited-edition models in Flame Red, Sapphire Blue, Hurricane Yellow, Jungle Green and Cement Gray.

The front and back of the phone are protected by Corning Gorilla Glass Victus and feel good to the touch, but they are real fingerprint magnets. The same goes for the glossy polished aluminium frame. The device is very well built, and all the gaps on the chassis are tight and even. The SIM slot's cover is made of the same material as the frame and forms a whole with the frame that looks and feels clean.

Design-wise, the camera module now sets itself further apart from those on other Xiaomi phones and is featured prominently on the back, sticking out considerable 2.25 mm (0.09 inch) from the body. The Xiaomi 13 has an IP68 rating, meaning it is water resistant and protected from dust.

(Image: Daniel Schmidt/notebookcheck.com)
(Image: Daniel Schmidt/notebookcheck.com)
(Image: Daniel Schmidt/notebookcheck.com)
(Image: Daniel Schmidt/notebookcheck.com)
(Image: Daniel Schmidt/notebookcheck.com)
(Image: Daniel Schmidt/notebookcheck.com)

Size comparison

163.7 mm / 6.44 inch 73.9 mm / 2.91 inch 8.5 mm / 0.3346 inch 221 g0.4872 lbs162.9 mm / 6.41 inch 76.6 mm / 3.02 inch 8.9 mm / 0.3504 inch 212 g0.4674 lbs161.76 mm / 6.37 inch 73.5 mm / 2.89 inch 8.39 mm / 0.3303 inch 198.5 g0.4376 lbs152.7 mm / 6.01 inch 69.9 mm / 2.75 inch 8.66 mm / 0.3409 inch 179 g0.3946 lbs152.8 mm / 6.02 inch 71.5 mm / 2.81 inch 7.98 mm / 0.3142 inch 189 g0.4167 lbs147.5 mm / 5.81 inch 71.5 mm / 2.81 inch 7.85 mm / 0.3091 inch 206 g0.4542 lbs146 mm / 5.75 inch 70.6 mm / 2.78 inch 7.6 mm / 0.2992 inch 167 g0.3682 lbs148 mm / 5.83 inch 105 mm / 4.13 inch 1 mm / 0.03937 inch 1.5 g0.00331 lbs

Specifications - Still only supports USB 2.0

As with its predecessor, the Xiaomi 13 is equipped with a USB-C port that doesn't support video output over a cable. But at least it is capable of OTG, thus enabling users to connect external peripherals and storage devices. Unfortunately, the interface only supports USB 2.0 and managed to achieve transfer speeds of just 37.7 MB/s during our testing.

The phone also doesn't have an audio jack or a microSD slot. In return, you'll get an IR blaster that lets you remotely control things like multimedia devices, air conditioners and cameras. The Xiaomi 13 also has Bluetooth 5.3, NFC and UWB capability (for turning the device into a digital car key).

In China, the flagship phone is available in four memory/storage configurations: 8/128 GB, 8/256 GB, 12/256 GB and 12/512 GB. Based on experience, there will likely be fewer options for the international version.

Top: Microphone, speaker, IR blaster, microphone (image: Daniel Schmidt)
Top: Microphone, speaker, IR blaster, microphone
Left side (miage: Daniel Schmidt)
Left side
Right side: Volume rocker, power button (image: Daniel Schmidt)
Right side: Volume rocker, power button
Bottom: Speaker, USB port, microphone, SIM slot (image: Daniel Schmidt)
Bottom: Speaker, USB port, microphone, SIM slot

Software - Xiaomi 13 ships with Android 13 and MIUI 14

The Xiaomi 13 ships with the current Android 13. Our import version from China comes preinstalled with many Chinese apps. Google Play Store was missing on our review unit, but this can be easily remedied afterwards using an APK. However, if you purchase the phone from TradingShenzhen (who kindly loaned us the review unit), Google Play Store will come preinstalled on the device.

The phone already has basic Google services out of the box, but Android Auto doesn't work on the import version, which only supports the following system languages: Chinese, Tibetan, Uyghur and English – something we've already have seen on the Mix Fold 2. It should be possible to view DRM-protected content in HD on the Xiaomi 13 because the device has Widevine L1 certification.

At the time of this review, the security patches were last updated on 1 December 2022 and thus not the very latest. Right now, Xiaomi hasn't announced how many years of updates the device is going to receive. Though it is likely that Xiaomi is planning to offer three Android updates and four years of security patches (rolled out quarterly) for the phone. More information will certainly be made available during the global launch.

Connectivity and GNSS - Exceptional performance in the 6GHz band

The Xiaomi 13 is able to access a local data network using the speedy Wi-Fi 6E and can thus utilise the 6GHz band. Paired with our reference router (Asus ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000), the phone not delivered immensely high transfer speeds but also maintained a very stable connection. In the 5GHz band, the Xiaomi device managed to produced similarly great performance, only slowing down when transmitting data. On paper, the Xiaomi 13 currently also supports Wi-Fi 7, but we were unable to test it out  because we didn't have an appropriate router on hand.

The mobile frequency bands on our import unit are tailored to the Asian market. This doesn't pose any problem in Europe for sub-6 5G because all the necessary bands are supported. The story is different with LTE. The lack of support for band 20 (800MHz) is especially worth pointing out as it is used by service providers for wide-area coverage. As a result, you probably wouldn't notice this in urban areas and big cities, but it can definitely become an issue in more rural areas as well as on highways.

This limitation doesn't apply to the international version because, based on experience, it will likely support a much wider range of mobile frequency bands.

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
904 (453min - 912max) MBit/s +1%
Xiaomi 13
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
894 (803min - 944max) MBit/s
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
881 (446min - 922max) MBit/s -1%
Xiaomi 12
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
854 (763min - 898max) MBit/s -4%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
820 (799min - 837max) MBit/s -8%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
763 (386min - 780max) MBit/s -15%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
723 (365min - 741max) MBit/s -19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (34.8 - 1875, n=211, last 2 years)
653 MBit/s -27%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
945 (917min - 968max) MBit/s +23%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
890 (433min - 934max) MBit/s +16%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
839 (531min - 913max) MBit/s +9%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
823 (418min - 852max) MBit/s +7%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
822 (409min - 835max) MBit/s +7%
Xiaomi 13
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
770 (459min - 912max) MBit/s
Xiaomi 12
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
757 (380min - 826max) MBit/s -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (40.5 - 1810, n=212, last 2 years)
689 MBit/s -11%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Xiaomi 13
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1894 (955min - 1923max) MBit/s
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1657 (1379min - 1781max) MBit/s -13%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1645 (1586min - 1695max) MBit/s -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (229 - 1894, n=61, last 2 years)
1549 MBit/s -18%
Xiaomi 12
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1407 (872min - 1714max) MBit/s -26%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Xiaomi 12
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1751 (879min - 1776max) MBit/s +6%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1743 (1585min - 1798max) MBit/s +5%
Xiaomi 13
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1656 (1620min - 1684max) MBit/s
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1522 (1278min - 1606max) MBit/s -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (598 - 1844, n=61, last 2 years)
1376 MBit/s -17%
01002003004005006007008009001000110012001300140015001600170018001900Tooltip
Xiaomi 13 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1862 (955-1923)
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1657 (1379-1781)
Xiaomi 13 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1655 (1620-1684)
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1520 (1278-1606)
Xiaomi 13 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø892 (803-944)
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø865 (446-922)
Xiaomi 13 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø755 (459-912)
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø839 (531-913)
GPS test: in a building
in a building
GPS test: outdoors
outdoors
GPS test: supported GNSS
GNSS

During our testing, satfix didn't work inside buildings, and the Xiaomi 13 needed a few seconds to get it working outdoors. It likewise took a while before accuracy settled down at five metres. However, the GNSS support is exemplary in theory.

We took the phone on a bike ride to pit it against the Garmin Venu 2. Over the roughly 10 km route (6.2 mi), the difference between the distances measured by the two devices was a mere 40 m (131 ft) – a superb result. That said, the detailed route traced by the Xiaomi 13 showed a few overexaggerated bends. Even though this probably isn't going to cause any limitations for navigation purposes, we wish that the phone's location tracking would be somewhat more accurate.

GNSS test ride: around the lake
GNSS test ride: around the lake
GNSS test ride: turning point
GNSS test ride: turning point
GNSS test ride: summary
GNSS test ride: summary

Telephony and voice quality

The Xiaomi 13 supports wireless features such as VoLTE and Wi-Fi calling but doesn't offer any built-in SIP account management. The two nano SIM slots are both 5G-enabled. However, the device lacks eSIM support. Unlike the international version of the Xiaomi 13, the Chinese variant is able to record phone calls.

We are impressed by the voice quality on the Xiaomi 13. When the phone is held to the ear, voices sound natural when transmitted, and minor background noises are reliably suppressed. In speakerphone mode, the device has decent microphone pick-up range and a relatively low echo effect.

Cameras - Triple-camera setup with Leica partnership

Selfie in portrait mode (image: Daniel Schmidt)
Selfie in portrait mode
Selfie in photo mode (image: Daniel Schmidt)
Selfie in photo mode

The front camera is very similar to the one on the Xiaomi 12. It once again has a whopping 32MP resolution but is equipped with a wider f/2.0 aperture. The front camera is a step backwards in terms of video capability. It is able to record videos at up to Full HD but only at 30 fps. In contrast, the Xiaomi 12 can do Full HD videos at 60 fps. The camera produces pleasant image quality in good lighting. And photos are available at full resolution because the sensor doesn't use pixel binning.

Xiaomi has been touting the triple-camera array developed in conjunction with Leica as one of the phone's highlights. The main camera has a Sony IMX800 sensor with 54 megapixels (of which 50 megapixels are effectively usable) and carries the the label Leica Vario-Summicron 1:18-2.2/15-75 ASPH. You'll also find an ultrawide camera and a telephoto lens with 3.2x optical zoom. The partnership with Leica appears to go beyond just software and also includes an ALD coating on the lenses that is designed to improve their quality. Leica offers two modes in the software: Vibrant and Authentic. The former makes colours look brighter and more saturated, whereas the latter is meant to replicate the original Leica look and allow for vivid light and saturated shadows. All our test shots were taken in Authentic mode.

Images taken using the main camera stand out with very high contrast and a high degree of detail. This level of contrast makes photos look slightly too dark. The ultrawide camera has a decent depth of field, but images become visibly less sharp towards the edges. Dark areas also exhibit perceptible noise. The zoom camera offers reasonable image quality, even at 5x zoom. However, contours are very heavily sharpened in post, thus causing the subject to look extremely unnatural. 

The rear camera array can record Ultra HD videos at up to 60 fps or 8K videos at 24 fps. The latter option ends up being quite average because dark areas in 8K videos have visible noise.

3.2x optical zoom (image: Daniel Schmidt)
5x digital zoom (image: Daniel Schmidt)
10x digital zoom (image: Daniel Schmidt)
30x digital zoom (image: Daniel Schmidt)

Zoom images (from left): 3.2x, 5x, 10x and 30x zoom

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

HauptkameraHauptkameraUltraweitwinkel5-facher ZoomLow-Light
click to load images

Under controlled lighting conditions, the main camera reproduced our test chart in great detail in the centre of the photo. The image loses a bit of sharpness and contrast towards the edges, but this loss isn't excessive.

Despite the Leica Authentic mode, the camera system is remarkably similar to the one on the Xiaomi 12 in terms of colour reproduction. Delta E values have been marginally improved, but shades of green in particular still deviate greatly from how they are supposed to look in real life. 

ColorChecker
10.1 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
18 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
8 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
16.5 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
8 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi 13: 8.86 ∆E min: 3.26 - max: 18.01 ∆E
ColorChecker
30 ∆E
53.5 ∆E
40.3 ∆E
33.8 ∆E
46.7 ∆E
61.1 ∆E
51.9 ∆E
36.5 ∆E
42.6 ∆E
31.2 ∆E
63.5 ∆E
62.6 ∆E
32.6 ∆E
46.9 ∆E
36.7 ∆E
74.3 ∆E
44.3 ∆E
42.4 ∆E
88.5 ∆E
70.3 ∆E
51.5 ∆E
37 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi 13: 46.49 ∆E min: 13.91 - max: 88.45 ∆E

Accessories and warranty - A mere 12-month warranty

The Xiaomi 13 comes with a modular 67-watt power adapter with a USB-A port. If you decide to go with an import device, you'll receive a model that is compatible with the Type A electrical plug. However, TradingShenzhen, who loaned us the device, has included an appropriate adapter. Also inside the box are a corresponding USB cable (Type A to C), a SIM ejector tool and a clear silicone case.

Xiaomi unfortunately only provides a 12-month warranty on the phone, but your warranty rights are not affected by this (where applicable). 

Input devices and operation - Optical fingerprint scanner

The capacitive touchscreen on the Xiaomi 13 can recognise up to ten simultaneous touch events and has a touch sampling rate of up to 240Hz, which is half of what the predecessor is capable of. But you won't notice this in everyday use. The phone responds quickly and accurately to inputs, and the screen's glass surface is exceptionally smooth and lets you slide your finger across effortlessly.

The vibration motor produces a nice tactile haptic feedback and is hardly audible when running. The one-handed mode took a cue from the iPhone and works very well. Xiaomi has also implemented many other gestures designed to make using the phone easier.

An optical fingerprint scanner built into the display can be used for biometric authentication. During our testing, the scanner delivered a high recognition rate and promptly unlocked the Xiaomi 13. Apart from the fingerprint reader, you can also use the front camera to unlock the phone, though it is less secure.

Display - Ultra-bright AMOLED capable of up to 120Hz

Subpixel structure
Subpixel structure
Flicker mode
Flicker mode

The display on the Xiaomi 13 measures 6.36 inches (16.15 cm) and has a Full HD resolution – equivalent to a pixel density of 400 PPI. The smartphone also supports all modern HDR standards, including HDR10+ and Dolby Vision. Less up to date, however, is the screen's adaptive refresh rate, which can only switch dynamically between 60, 90 and 120Hz.

With the ambient light sensor enabled, the screen had a peak brightness of 1,217 cd/m² when displaying a fully white image, which is a substantial improvement over the predecessor (max. 875 cd/m²). Whilst Xiaomi promises a local peak brightness of 1,900 nits, we only managed to get a maximum of 1,756 cd/m² (APL18) out of the review unit. Still an excellent result nonetheless. If you prefer to adjust screen brightness manually, you'll have up to 506 cd/m² at your disposal.

As with most smartphones with an OLED panel, the Xiaomi 13 has issues with flicker. At the lowest brightness, the display flickers at a fairly rough 162 to 488Hz. The waveform becomes smoother with increasing brightness. At brightness levels above 65%, we were only able to detect flicker amounting to the refresh rate. So if you are sensitive to the use of pulse-wave modulation, you should enable the DC dimming option (anti-flicker mode). Once it was activated, we could only detect flicker equalling to the refresh rate across the entire brightness range. 

1217
cd/m²
1208
cd/m²
1204
cd/m²
1215
cd/m²
1209
cd/m²
1195
cd/m²
1217
cd/m²
1204
cd/m²
1202
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1217 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1207.9 cd/m² Minimum: 2.06 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 1209 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 2.1 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
98.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.26
Xiaomi 13
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.36
Samsung Galaxy S22
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.10
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
pOLED, 2400x1080, 6.67
Google Pixel 7 Pro
OLED, 3120x1440, 6.70
Oppo Find X5 Pro
AMOLED, 3216x1440, 6.70
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
Super Retina XDR OLED, 2556x1179, 6.10
Xiaomi 12
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.28
Screen
-19%
-2%
12%
3%
-2%
-22%
Brightness middle
1209
853
-29%
1020
-16%
1022
-15%
746
-38%
1046
-13%
867
-28%
Brightness
1208
858
-29%
1020
-16%
1025
-15%
744
-38%
1049
-13%
867
-28%
Brightness Distribution
98
96
-2%
96
-2%
99
1%
97
-1%
98
0%
98
0%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.2
1.9
-58%
1
17%
0.9
25%
0.9
25%
1.2
-0%
1.7
-42%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3
3.2
-7%
2.8
7%
2.1
30%
1.6
47%
3.1
-3%
4.4
-47%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.1
1.9
10%
2.1
-0%
1.1
48%
1.6
24%
1.7
19%
1.8
14%
Gamma
2.26 97%
2.07 106%
2.29 96%
2.22 99%
2.23 99%
2.19 100%
2.2 100%
CCT
6504 100%
6460 101%
6502 100%
6650 98%
6499 100%
6538 99%
6762 96%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 488 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 488 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 488 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17788 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

minimum screen brightness
min.
25% screen brightness
25%
50% screen brightness
50%
75% screen brightness
75%
maximum screen brightness (manual adjustment)
100%

We examined the panel's colour reproduction more closely using a spectrophotometer and the Calman analysis software. The Xiaomi 13's display is most true to life in the "Original" colour mode, but this option only targets the smaller sRGB colour gamut. In this mode, there aren't any perceivable colour differences. The default "Vivid" mode makes colours appear more saturated and has a much cooler white balance. However, it supports the larger DCI-P3 colour space.

Greyscale (colour mode: Original; target colour gamut: sRGB)
Greyscale (colour mode: Original; target colour gamut: sRGB)
Colours (colour mode: Original; target colour gamut: sRGB)
Colours (colour mode: Original; target colour gamut: sRGB)
Colour space (colour mode: Original; target colour gamut: sRGB)
Colour space (colour mode: Original; target colour gamut: sRGB)
Saturation (colour mode: Original; target colour gamut: sRGB)
Saturation (colour mode: Original; target colour gamut: sRGB)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
1.16 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.6315 ms rise
↘ 0.533 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.4 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.67 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.8355 ms rise
↘ 0.834 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.6 ms).

The Xiaomi 13 is very much in its element outdoors and has enough screen brightness at its disposal to ensure that the display remains highly readable even on a sunny day. At most, the viewing experience may be disrupted by reflections on the display.

The Xiaomi 13's OLED panel has an great viewing angle. Though when the display is viewed from a very sharp angle, the brightness decreases noticeably and you can see a slight tint on the content being shown. However, it doesn't result in any colour distortion.

Viewing angle of the Xiaomi 13
Viewing angle of the Xiaomi 13

Performance - Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 in Xiaomi 13

The Xiaomi 13 sports the latest Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 made by Qualcomm, which is flanked by 8 GB of LPDDR5x memory in our review unit. The high-end SoC comprises a total of four clusters. The first has a single Prime core that can run at up to 3.2 GHz. The two performance clusters feature two Cortex A715 cores and two Cortex A710 cores (each capable of up to 2.8 GHz) respectively, whilst the final cluster has three Cortex A510 cores for running tasks at high efficiency.

In terms of pure CPU speed, the device is leaps and bounds ahead of the Xiaomi 12 (Snapdragon 8 Gen 1). It scored 19% higher in the Geekbench single-core test, with the lead extending to 42% in the multi-core test. What's more, the SoC even showed great performance gains over the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (+11% / +20%).

Not only is the phone's performance fantastic in day-to-day use, but we also couldn't find any faults with it in benchmarks. Although the Xiaomi 13 trails behind the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra in Basemark OS II, it beats the Motorala phone by a larger margin in AnTuTu.

Evaluating the phone's AI performance isn't such an easy undertaking. AIMark didn't run on the Xiaomi 13. In Procyon, the device is only marginally faster than the Edge 30 Ultra. The Pixel 7 Pro and iPhone 14 Pro completely blew away the Xiaomi in Geekbench ML. But this could also be due to poor driver optimisation. Upcoming reviews of smartphones with the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 will shed more light on this topic.

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
1878 Points +27%
Xiaomi 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
1478 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (1048 - 1574, n=19)
1453 Points -2%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1328 Points -10%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1257 Points -15%
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
1237 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
1145 Points -23%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
1048 Points -29%
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 2138, n=211, last 2 years)
914 Points -38%
Multi-Core
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
5538 Points +9%
Xiaomi 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
5090 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (4192 - 5243, n=19)
4924 Points -3%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
4251 Points -16%
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
3581 Points -30%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
3488 Points -31%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
3474 Points -32%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
3222 Points -37%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6681, n=211, last 2 years)
3005 Points -41%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Xiaomi 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
1273775 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (1111522 - 1322448, n=16)
1262734 Points -1%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1073804 Points -16%
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
982789 Points -23%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
965593 Points -24%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
856953 Points -33%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
813746 Points -36%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
773857 Points -39%
Average of class Smartphone
  (102602 - 1650926, n=146, last 2 years)
748379 Points -41%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
17340 Points +23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (11562 - 19783, n=21)
15678 Points +11%
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
14508 Points +3%
Xiaomi 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
14094 Points
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
14068 Points 0%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
12144 Points -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4761 - 21385, n=210, last 2 years)
11860 Points -16%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
11397 Points -19%
CrossMark - Overall
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
1332 Points +9%
Xiaomi 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
1219 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (778 - 1356, n=19)
1150 Points -6%
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
1109 Points -9%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1103 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
957 Points -21%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
956 Points -22%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
886 Points -27%
Average of class Smartphone
  (200 - 1474, n=163, last 2 years)
843 Points -31%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (7354 - 9730, n=19)
8746 Points +7%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
8164 Points 0%
Xiaomi 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
8153 Points
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
6991 Points -14%
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
6860 Points -16%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
6799 Points -17%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
6164 Points -24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (411 - 11438, n=161, last 2 years)
5883 Points -28%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
Points -100%
System
Xiaomi 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
13646 Points
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
13412 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (10786 - 15148, n=19)
13114 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
11210 Points -18%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
10340 Points -24%
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
10334 Points -24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2376 - 16475, n=161, last 2 years)
9825 Points -28%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
9294 Points -32%
Memory
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (6601 - 10821, n=19)
9421 Points +15%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
8777 Points +7%
Xiaomi 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
8179 Points
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
6535 Points -20%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
6523 Points -20%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
6413 Points -22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (670 - 12716, n=161, last 2 years)
6394 Points -22%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
5456 Points -33%
Graphics
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (22837 - 32334, n=19)
27332 Points +14%
Xiaomi 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
23966 Points
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
21944 Points -8%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
19247 Points -20%
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
18370 Points -23%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
17269 Points -28%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
16375 Points -32%
Average of class Smartphone
  (697 - 58651, n=161, last 2 years)
14727 Points -39%
Web
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1960 Points +19%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
1924 Points +16%
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
1785 Points +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (1077 - 2044, n=19)
1763 Points +7%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
1739 Points +5%
Xiaomi 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
1652 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2145, n=161, last 2 years)
1511 Points -9%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1444 Points -13%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
68880 Points +332%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
42662 Points +167%
Average of class Smartphone
  (207 - 84787, n=146, last 2 years)
21632 Points +36%
Xiaomi 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
15961 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (11338 - 16880, n=18)
15279 Points -4%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
14572 Points -9%
Geekbench ML
TensorFlow Lite CPU 0.5
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
1043 Points +80%
Average of class Smartphone
  (215 - 1418, n=18, last 2 years)
615 Points +6%
Xiaomi 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
579 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (547 - 608, n=3)
578 Points 0%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
568 Points -2%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
319 Points -45%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
284 Points -51%
TensorFlow Lite GPU 0.5
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
2522 Points +38%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
2186 Points +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (1833 - 2202, n=3)
2037 Points +11%
Xiaomi 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
1833 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (474 - 2842, n=18, last 2 years)
1775 Points -3%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1631 Points -11%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
1002 Points -45%
TensorFlow Lite NNAPI / Core ML 0.5
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
3190 Points +485%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
2164 Points +297%
Average of class Smartphone
  (344 - 3638, n=16, last 2 years)
1643 Points +201%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
619 Points +14%
Xiaomi 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
545 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (401 - 633, n=3)
526 Points -3%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
441 Points -19%

The Adreno 740 integrated in the SoC is responsible for graphics processing. The GPU's performance is a bit of a mixed bag. In older benchmarks with OpenGL ES API, the new GPU is sometimes slower than the Adreno 730 on the previous Snapdragon 8 – but this could likewise be caused by a driver issue. Once the Vulkan API is used, we saw performance gains of up to 34%, and the Xiaomi 13 even outperformed the current-gen iPhone.

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi 13
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3707 Points
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
3265 Points -12%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2768 Points -25%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2523 Points -32%
Xiaomi 12
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2418 Points -35%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1855 Points -50%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1807 Points -51%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi 13
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3751 Points
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
3383 Points -10%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2796 Points -25%
Xiaomi 12
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2586 Points -31%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2575 Points -31%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1946 Points -48%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1847 Points -51%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi 13
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
14002 Points
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
12429 Points -11%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10982 Points -22%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10175 Points -27%
Xiaomi 12
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9782 Points -30%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7458 Points -47%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6721 Points -52%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5857 Points +40%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4672 Points +12%
Xiaomi 12
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4303 Points +3%
Xiaomi 13
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4177 Points
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4000 Points -4%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3902 Points -7%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi 13
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
25306 Points
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
20640 Points -18%
Xiaomi 12
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
18286 Points -28%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
18090 Points -29%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11893 Points -53%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10987 Points -57%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
13223 Points +11%
Xiaomi 13
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
11914 Points
Xiaomi 12
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10618 Points -11%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10005 Points -16%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8449 Points -29%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8268 Points -31%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
144 fps +20%
Xiaomi 12
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
121 fps +1%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi 13
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps -1%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -50%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps -50%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
462 fps +17%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
456 fps +15%
Xiaomi 12
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
428 fps +8%
Xiaomi 13
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
395 fps
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
380 fps -4%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
302 fps -24%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
251 fps -36%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
144 fps +20%
Xiaomi 12
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
121 fps +1%
Xiaomi 13
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps -1%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
84 fps -30%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -50%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps -50%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
292 fps +14%
Xiaomi 13
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
257 fps
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
237 fps -8%
Xiaomi 12
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
213 fps -17%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
193 fps -25%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
181 fps -30%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
139 fps -46%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi 12
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
121 fps +1%
Xiaomi 13
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps -1%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
113 fps -6%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps -50%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
56 fps -53%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
56 fps -53%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
197 fps +9%
Xiaomi 13
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
181 fps
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
179 fps -1%
Xiaomi 12
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
164 fps -9%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
123 fps -32%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
111 fps -39%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
101 fps -44%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi 13
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
93 fps
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
89 fps -4%
Xiaomi 12
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
81 fps -13%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -35%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps -35%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
39 fps -58%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
37 fps -60%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
114 fps +9%
Xiaomi 13
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
105 fps
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
103 fps -2%
Xiaomi 12
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
78 fps -26%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
68 fps -35%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
67 fps -36%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
63 fps -40%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi 12
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
69 fps +5%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
68 fps +3%
Xiaomi 13
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
66 fps
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
59 fps -11%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
51 fps -23%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
36 fps -45%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
28 fps -58%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi 13
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
56 fps
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
52 fps -7%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
44 fps -21%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
40 fps -29%
Xiaomi 12
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
39 fps -30%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
31 fps -45%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
29 fps -48%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi 13
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
113 fps
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
104 fps -8%
Xiaomi 12
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
93 fps -18%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
66 fps -42%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps -47%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
53 fps -53%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
38 fps -66%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi 13
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
142 fps
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
133 fps -6%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps -16%
Xiaomi 12
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99 fps -30%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
94 fps -34%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
75 fps -47%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
67 fps -53%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi 13
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
25 fps
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
23 fps -8%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
23 fps -8%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
14 fps -44%

Basemark GPUScore