Notebookcheck Logo
Teaser

Motorola Edge 50 smartphone review – When luxury features meet a mid-range price

Framelessly good.

The Motorola Edge 50 is barely bigger than its predecessor, but it features a larger screen and a much more powerful battery. In addition, it boasts lots of storage and speedy 6 GHz WLAN. This is all good news, but are there also negatives about the phone?
Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by Daisy Dickson) Published 🇩🇪 🇫🇷 ...
5G Android ARM Smartphone
Motorola Edge 50 (Edge 50 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 8 x 1.8 - 2.4 GHz, Cortex-A710 / A510
Graphics adapter
Memory
12 GB 
Display
6.70 inch 20:9, 2712 x 1220 pixel 444 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, P-OLED, Gorilla Glass 5, 360Hz sampling rate, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 512 GB 
, 495 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: audio via USB-C, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration sensor, gyroscope, proximity sensor, compass
Networking
Wi-Fi 6E (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B4/​B5/​B8/​B19), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B13/​B17/​B18/​B19/​B20/​B25/​B26/​B28/​B32/​B38/​B39/​B40/​B41/​B42/​B43/​B48/​B66), 5G (n1/​n2/​n3/​n5/​n7/​n8/​n20/​n28/​n38/​n40/​n41/​n66/​n77/​n78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.8 x 160.8 x 72.4 ( = 0.31 x 6.33 x 2.85 in)
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 68W charging (Motorola TurboPower), 15W wireless charging (Qi)
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 14
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix f/​1.8, phase comparison-AF (All-pixel AF), OIS, LED-flash, Videos @2160p/​30fps (Camera 1); 13.0MP, f/​2.2, phase comparison-AF, wide angle lens, macro lens (Camera 2); 10.0MP, f/​2.0, phase comparison-AF, OIS, telephoto lens (Camera 3)
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix f/​2.4, Videos @1080p/​60fps
Additional features
Speakers: stereo speakers (hybrid), USB-C cable, SIM tool, silicone bumper, 24 Months Warranty, IP68-certified; eSIM-support (1x Nano-SIM, 1x eSIM); SAR: 0.88W/​kg Head, 1.33W/​kg Body , fanless, waterproof
Weight
180 g ( = 6.35 oz / 0.4 pounds) ( = 0 oz / 0 pounds)
Price
600 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible competitors compared

Rating
Version
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Price
78.6 %v8
10 / 2024
Motorola Edge 50
SD 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644
180 g512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.70"2712x1220
86.8 %
v7 (old)
v7 (old)
07 / 2023
Motorola Edge 40
Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9
171 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.55"2400x1080
80.9 %v8
09 / 2024
OnePlus Nord 4
SD 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732
199.5 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.74"2772x1240
81.9 %v8
07 / 2024
Google Pixel 8a
Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7
188 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.10"2400x1080
87.4 %
v7 (old)
v7 (old)
05 / 2024
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530
213 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.60"2340x1080

Please note: We have updated our rating system and the results of version 8 are not comparable with the results of version 7. More information is available here.

Case and connectivity – Colorful if desired

The Motorola Edge 50 is part of Motorola's high-end series, but costing only around $600, it is situated more in between the premium mid-range and high-end class.

Screen glass extending over its edges matches the name of the Motorola Edge 50 and the entire series, as (almost) all of the devices look like this. Of course, the mid-range phone isn't completely borderless, but a screen-to-body ratio of 93.1% is still impressive. There are also only narrow bezels along the top and bottom.

In addition to the chic Koala Gray, the phone comes in the colorways Jungle Green and Peach Fuzz—two brighter colors. The back is covered with artificial leather or artificial suede and boasts a very high-quality feel.

While the phone is slightly longer than its predecessor, it is still quite compact with regard to its 6.7-inch screen. Plus, weighing in at 180 grams, it is comparatively lightweight. Thanks to its rounded sides, the phone feels super slim and is comfortable to hold. The metal frame only protrudes slightly at the top and bottom corners, creating unpleasant edges that can impair the feel of it.

The Edge 50 has been built very stably and can neither be affected through twisting nor by applying strong pressure. Its screen is protected by Gorilla Glass 5 and if you accidentally drop the Edge 50 into freshwater, then you needn't panic, as it is IP68 protected against dust and water.

Unfortunately, Motorola has installed a USB 2.0 port, so data transfers are only possible at standard speed and mirroring the display can only be done wirelessly. However, NFC for mobile payments is on board. It only has one nano-SIM slot, but you can also store an eSIM profile. This means that the phone supports dual SIM operation.

Size comparison

162.6 mm / 6.4 in 75 mm / 2.95 in 8 mm / 0.315 in 199.5 g0.4398 lbs161.1 mm / 6.34 in 77.4 mm / 3.05 in 8.2 mm / 0.3228 in 213 g0.4696 lbs160.8 mm / 6.33 in 72.4 mm / 2.85 in 7.8 mm / 0.3071 in 180 g0.3968 lbs158.43 mm / 6.24 in 71.99 mm / 2.83 in 7.49 mm / 0.2949 in 171 g0.377 lbs152.2 mm / 5.99 in 72.7 mm / 2.86 in 8.9 mm / 0.3504 in 188 g0.4145 lbs148 mm / 5.83 in 105 mm / 4.13 in 1 mm / 0.03937 in 1.5 g0.00331 lbs

Communication and software – Very fast WLAN on the Edge 50

Motorola's smartphone features WiFi 6E, meaning it can also access the lesser-used 6-GHz frequency for WLAN connections. This yields good results: During our test, we measured receiving values of over 1,600 MBit/s. As a result, you can make use of a gigabit data line very well, but such speeds only really become interesting when using a fast internal network structure.

The smartphone boasts similarly good mobile frequency support, including enough 4G and 5G frequencies to allow it to be used further afield to access the web on the go. We repeatedly tested its reception on a random basis during our test and compared it with high-end smartphones. The Motorola Edge 50 performed well and often showed just as good reception as the even more high-end devices.

The smartphone can be located via satellite and we set off on a bike ride to determine the accuracy of its positioning capabilities. The Edge 50 scored highly, deviating only minimally from our actual route in very few places and not even being disturbed by narrow old town streets with a weak signal. All in all, the Edge 50 gains our full recommendation for navigation tasks.

Its operating system is based on Android 14 and Motorola has changed very little about it. All in-house functions are outsourced to separate apps so that they can be kept up to date without needing a complete system update. Some, perhaps unwanted, third-party apps come pre-installed—such as social networks or games. However, they can be uninstalled easily. At the time of testing, the latest security patches were from August 2024, so they could do with an update.

Motorola's update policy is somewhat strange: While the cheaper Edge 50 Neo has more up-to-date security patches and is supposed to receive updates for 5 years, the Edge 50 only has a 3-year update promise and will see new Android versions up to Android 17.

Networking
Motorola Edge 50
Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
589 (min: 439) MBit/s ∼63%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
902 (min: 791) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
717 (min: 525) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1637 (min: 1566) MBit/s ∼100%
Motorola Edge 40
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
942 (min: 912) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
839 (min: 774) MBit/s ∼93%
OnePlus Nord 4
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
533 (min: 459) MBit/s ∼57%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
893 (min: 779) MBit/s ∼99%
Google Pixel 8a
Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
856 (min: 450) MBit/s ∼91%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
834 (min: 780) MBit/s ∼92%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
521 (min: 418) MBit/s ∼73%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
754 (min: 611) MBit/s ∼46%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
735 (min: 671) MBit/s ∼78%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
823 (min: 704) MBit/s ∼91%
08517025534042551059568076585093510201105119012751360144515301615Tooltip
Motorola Edge 50; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø717 (525-1188)
Motorola Edge 50; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1637 (1566-1664)
Motorola Edge 50; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø902 (791-924)
Motorola Edge 50; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø589 (439-783)
Motorola Edge 50 location services – overview
Motorola Edge 50 location services – overview
Motorola Edge 50 location services – turning point
Motorola Edge 50 location services – turning point
Motorola Edge 50 location services – bridge
Motorola Edge 50 location services – bridge
Garmin Venu 2 location services – overview
Garmin Venu 2 location services – overview
Garmin Venu 2 location services – turning point
Garmin Venu 2 location services – turning point
Garmin Venu 2 location services – bridge
Garmin Venu 2 location services – bridge

Sustainability and operation – Still some catching up to do, except for in its packaging

So, we aren't terribly enthusiastic about its software supply, nor about how long the device's service life is. From a sustainability point of view, its packaging is good, as it is plastic-free, the adhesives are water-based and the cardboard parts are largely made from recycled material.

Unfortunately, there is no data on the smartphone's CO2 consumption during its life cycle. There are also no repair instructions or spare parts for self-repair available for Motorola Edge smartphones.

The Edge 50's 120-Hz display is scanned for touches up to 360 times per second and can therefore be operated very quickly. The hardware buttons on the right-hand side of the case are for volume control and standby. They are easy to feel and have a clean pressure point.

A fingerprint sensor is hidden behind the screen. It is positioned quite far down so that it is easy to reach even with small hands. Once saved, fingerprints are recognized reliably and the phone is unlocked quickly. You can also gain access via facial recognition, which works just as reliably and even in low ambient light: the screen serves as a light source for recognition.

Cameras – Powerful even when zooming

Photo taken using front-facing camera
Photo taken using front-facing camera

Motorola has installed three fully-fledged, decent camera sensors on the back of the phone. Its main camera uses a 50-megapixel sensor from Sony. It takes quite good pictures, which are still reasonably sharp even when enlarged. Colors appear vibrant but not oversaturated and the dramatic sky in the photo of our surroundings didn't overwhelm the sensor.

In low light and high contrasts, the main camera could do with brightening up a little better in dark areas, but overall, it showed good sharpness and a decent representation of this difficult scene. The main camera also had to prove itself in our test lab: It showed slight weaknesses with very fine structures and its contrast also wasn't quite as high with a red background, for example. In very low light, the subject was still recognizable, but barely brightened.

The camera can record videos in a maximum of 4K at 30fps. The autofocus works quickly and you can usually rely on it without a doubt. The exposure compensation is also competent and, in most cases, works fast enough not to be unpleasantly noticeable.

A 13-megapixel wide-angle camera has also been installed. Unfortunately, it didn't produce a sharp image in our test and didn't brighten up the photos particularly well. It also features a 10-megapixel telephoto lens, which is supported by an optical image stabilizer. This enables a hybrid zoom and even higher zoom rates still look quite good thanks to the dedicated lens with a higher focal length.

There is a 32-megapixel camera on the front of the phone, which works using pixel binning and therefore usually takes 8-megapixel pictures. These could have a little more dynamic range in the shots, but the selfies still look sharp and rich in detail.

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera plantMain camera surroundingsMain camera low lightUltra-wide-angle camera
orginal image
click to load images
ColorChecker
5 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
6 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
1.5 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
2.2 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Edge 50: 4.94 ∆E min: 1.5 - max: 11.23 ∆E
ColorChecker
30.2 ∆E
54.5 ∆E
39 ∆E
34.4 ∆E
44.9 ∆E
61.2 ∆E
52.6 ∆E
32.7 ∆E
43.8 ∆E
29 ∆E
63.4 ∆E
63.5 ∆E
31.2 ∆E
46.9 ∆E
36.7 ∆E
73.5 ∆E
44.1 ∆E
40.9 ∆E
76.5 ∆E
68.1 ∆E
50.2 ∆E
36.4 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Edge 50: 45.48 ∆E min: 13.91 - max: 76.5 ∆E

Display – Bright and color-accurate

Sub-pixel array
Sub-pixel array

The Edge 50 comes with a 6.7-inch P-OLED display. It can handle a frame rate of up to 120 Hz and in our tests using a spectrophotometer and the CalMAN software, its brightness was similar to that of other smartphones in the same price range: we measured up to 1,185 cd/m² when depicting a full white screen and up to 1,546 cd/m² when showing smaller excerpts (APL 18). This means you can use the phone very well outdoors and the screen content is still easy to see even on brighter days.

We hardly have anything negative to say about its color reproduction in "natural" mode and a color cast isn't visible to the naked eye. This means that with the right settings, screen colors can be evaluated very well for professional purposes.

We measured flickering at low brightness levels at a frequency of 397 Hz and an amplitude of 22 %. This could be an issue for sensitive people, who should definitely try out the screen before buying to avoid any problems. However, Motorola also makes use of DC dimming at a frequency of 1,626 Hz, which can reduce the flickering.

1125
cd/m²
1146
cd/m²
1185
cd/m²
1155
cd/m²
1164
cd/m²
1174
cd/m²
1177
cd/m²
1124
cd/m²
1155
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 1185 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1156.1 cd/m² Minimum: 2.7 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 1164 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.14 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.83
ΔE Greyscale 2 | 0.09-98 Ø5.1
96.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.213
Motorola Edge 50
P-OLED, 2712x1220, 6.7"
Motorola Edge 40
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.6"
OnePlus Nord 4
AMOLED, 2772x1240, 6.7"
Google Pixel 8a
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.1"
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.6"
Response Times
4%
-298%
-61%
-43%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
1.1 ?(0.5, 0.6)
1.14 ?(0.5225, 0.6135)
-4%
10 ?(0.9, 9.1)
-809%
2.83 ?(1.338, 1.494)
-157%
1.53 ?(0.7745, 0.7575)
-39%
Response Time Black / White *
1 ?(0.5, 0.5)
0.89 ?(0.419, 0.473)
11%
2.3 ?(1, 1.3)
-130%
1.05 ?(0.4965, 0.5575)
-5%
1.47 ?(0.754, 0.7145)
-47%
PWM Frequency
397
144
119.2
120
120
PWM Amplitude *
22
12
45%
26.3
-20%
Screen
-22%
-12%
8%
-3%
Brightness middle
1164
1023
-12%
1102
-5%
1518
30%
962
-17%
Brightness
1156
1042
-10%
1102
-5%
1466
27%
967
-16%
Brightness Distribution
95
90
-5%
94
-1%
88
-7%
99
4%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.14
1.6
-40%
1.43
-25%
1.2
-5%
1.6
-40%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.46
4.3
-24%
4.04
-17%
3.3
5%
2.6
25%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2
2.8
-40%
2.4
-20%
2
-0%
1.5
25%
Gamma
2.213 99%
2.27 97%
2.213 99%
2.2 100%
2.13 103%
CCT
6553 99%
6457 101%
6385 102%
6786 96%
6382 102%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-9% / -16%
-155% / -107%
-27% / -15%
-23% / -13%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.5 ms rise
↘ 0.5 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.5 ms rise
↘ 0.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.1 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 397 Hz
Amplitude: 22 %
Secondary Frequency: 1626 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 397 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 397 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8354 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

minimum brightness
minimum brightness
25 % brightness
25 % brightness
50 % brightness
50 % brightness
75 % brightness
75 % brightness
100 % brightness
100 % brightness

Measurement series with fixed zoom level and different brightness settings

CalMAN grayscale
CalMAN grayscale
CalMAN color accuracy
CalMAN color accuracy
CalMAN sRGB color space
CalMAN sRGB color space
CalMAN saturation
CalMAN saturation

Performance, emissions and battery life – More could've been possible

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 is used as the phone's SoC. It ensures that the system runs smoothly in the vast majority of situations but is still relatively weak for this price range, and during our test, it was in some cases significantly outperformed by the SoC in its predecessor (the Motorola Edge 40), namely the MediaTek Dimensity 8020.

The Edge 50 also lags a little behind devices in the same price range in terms of graphics performance, and is more designed for gaming at 30fps than 60fps. Motorola has additionally made some savings when it comes to its storage, as the phone only uses UFS 2.2 storage which, although its capacity is large, is comparatively quite slow.

We measured a significant temperature increase on its case under prolonged load: Up to 55.9 °C at room temperature is certainly not pleasant and is clearly too high; on hot summer days, the temperature can rise to a critical level and shut down the device. Interestingly, the SoC didn't seem to be affected by these high temperatures and wasn't throttled even after numerous runs of a benchmark.

The speaker on the bottom edge is supported by the earphones, which enables slight stereo effects and makes the sound feel a little fuller. In general, the sound is pretty good—music is played quite loudly and isn't distorted even at maximum level. However, you shouldn't expect too much bass or low mids.

External speakers or headphones can be connected via the USB-C port or Bluetooth. Both worked without any problems during our test. Almost every Bluetooth audio codec currently available is supported, so even more exotic codecs can be used.

At 5000 mAh, its battery is significantly more powerful than that of its predecessor, but the phone's runtimes are only marginally better: 16:06 hours in our Wi-Fi test is by no means bad and should be enough to ensure that the phone doesn't have to be charged every single day with moderate use. Other smartphones, such as the Samsung Galaxy A55 5G, last significantly longer with the same battery capacity.

The Edge 50 can be charged using a cable at up to 68 watts. It then takes a maximum of just over an hour to reach 100 % charge again. Wireless charging is possible at up to 15 watts, but you'll have to provide your own charger as Motorola does not supply one.

Geekbench 6.4
Single-Core
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
1699 Points +57%
Average of class Smartphone
  (196 - 3479, n=207, last 2 years)
1608 Points +49%
OnePlus Nord 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 16384
1168 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
1157 Points +7%
Motorola Edge 40
MediaTek Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
1120 Points +4%
Motorola Edge 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288
1081 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
  (1016 - 1119, n=6)
1062 Points -2%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (830 - 10401, n=207, last 2 years)
4626 Points +57%
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
4408 Points +50%
OnePlus Nord 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 16384
3865 Points +31%
Motorola Edge 40
MediaTek Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
3617 Points +23%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
3456 Points +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
  (2601 - 3261, n=6)
2954 Points 0%
Motorola Edge 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288
2942 Points
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Motorola Edge 40
MediaTek Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
16611 Points +9%
Motorola Edge 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288
15189 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (4507 - 27169, n=194, last 2 years)
14304 Points -6%
OnePlus Nord 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 16384
14109 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
13393 Points -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
  (10389 - 15189, n=7)
12330 Points -19%
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
11565 Points -24%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Average of class Smartphone
  (508 - 23762, n=143, last 2 years)
8862 Points +39%
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
7856 Points +24%
OnePlus Nord 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 16384
7666 Points +21%
Motorola Edge 40
MediaTek Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
7606 Points +20%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
6828 Points +7%
Motorola Edge 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288
6361 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
  (5501 - 6466, n=7)
6187 Points -3%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
14498 Points +105%
Average of class Smartphone
  (453 - 40163, n=143, last 2 years)
13558 Points +92%
OnePlus Nord 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 16384
11506 Points +63%
Motorola Edge 40
MediaTek Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
8601 Points +22%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
7170 Points +1%
Motorola Edge 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288
7073 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
  (6767 - 7388, n=7)
7042 Points 0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
5850 Points +24%
Motorola Edge 40
MediaTek Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
5415 Points +15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (877 - 10632, n=143, last 2 years)
5005 Points +6%
Motorola Edge 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288
4704 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
  (3325 - 4704, n=7)
4369 Points -7%
OnePlus Nord 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 16384
3536 Points -25%
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
3005 Points -36%
Wild Life Score
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
8976 Points +182%
Motorola Edge 40
MediaTek Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
4490 Points +41%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
3897 Points +23%
Motorola Edge 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288
3181 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
  (3095 - 3181, n=7)
3141 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (270 - 13896, n=102, last 2 years)
2963 Points -7%
Wild Life Unlimited Score
OnePlus Nord 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 16384
11512 Points +267%
Average of class Smartphone
  (271 - 27493, n=189, last 2 years)
9650 Points +208%
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
8960 Points +186%
Motorola Edge 40
MediaTek Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
4405 Points +41%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
3992 Points +27%
Motorola Edge 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288
3133 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
  (3035 - 3184, n=7)
3133 Points 0%
Wild Life Extreme
OnePlus Nord 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 16384
2937 Points +253%
Average of class Smartphone
  (61 - 7094, n=194, last 2 years)
2605 Points +213%
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
2359 Points +184%
Motorola Edge 40
MediaTek Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
1262 Points +52%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
926 Points +11%
Motorola Edge 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288
832 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
  (819 - 854, n=7)
832 Points 0%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
OnePlus Nord 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 16384
2844 Points +244%
Average of class Smartphone
  (62 - 7212, n=193, last 2 years)
2594 Points +214%
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
2353 Points +185%
Motorola Edge 40
MediaTek Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
1228 Points +48%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
915 Points +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
  (825 - 854, n=7)
832 Points +1%
Motorola Edge 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288
827 Points
GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
81 fps +189%
OnePlus Nord 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 16384
60 fps +114%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.5 - 166, n=202, last 2 years)
56 fps +100%
Motorola Edge 40
MediaTek Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
46 fps +64%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
42 fps +50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
  (28 - 39, n=7)
33.4 fps +19%
Motorola Edge 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288
28 fps
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
OnePlus Nord 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 16384
130 fps +217%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.4 - 332, n=202, last 2 years)
104.4 fps +155%
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
96 fps +134%
Motorola Edge 40
MediaTek Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
50 fps +22%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
49 fps +20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
  (41 - 49, n=7)
45.3 fps +10%
Motorola Edge 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288
41 fps
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
OnePlus Nord 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 16384
60 fps +233%
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
59 fps +228%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 144, n=203, last 2 years)
44.4 fps +147%
Motorola Edge 40
MediaTek Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
33 fps +83%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
27 fps +50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
  (18 - 24, n=7)
20.9 fps +16%
Motorola Edge 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288
18 fps
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
OnePlus Nord 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 16384
49 fps +227%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 129, n=202, last 2 years)
41 fps +173%
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
36 fps +140%
Motorola Edge 40
MediaTek Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
21 fps +40%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
19 fps +27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
  (15 - 18, n=7)
16.4 fps +9%
Motorola Edge 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288
15 fps
3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
OnePlus Nord 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 16384
22 fps +210%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.54 - 53, n=203, last 2 years)
19.1 fps +169%
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
16 fps +125%
Motorola Edge 40
MediaTek Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
9.2 fps +30%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
7.9 fps +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
  (7 - 7.9, n=7)
7.41 fps +4%
Motorola Edge 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288
7.1 fps
Octane V2 - Total Score
OnePlus Nord 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 16384
55668 Points +70%
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
46738 Points +43%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2228 - 100368, n=205, last 2 years)
44496 Points +36%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
41576 Points +27%
Motorola Edge 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288
32706 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
  (21143 - 34866, n=7)
28984 Points -11%
Motorola Edge 40
MediaTek Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
28282 Points -14%
Geekbench ML
0.6 TensorFlow Lite NNAPI
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
2488 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (186 - 3410, n=29, last 2 years)
647 Points
OnePlus Nord 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 16384
256 Points
0.6 TensorFlow Lite GPU
OnePlus Nord 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 16384
783 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (123 - 1478, n=33, last 2 years)
746 Points
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
704 Points
0.6 TensorFlow Lite CPU
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
998 Points
OnePlus Nord 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 16384
939 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (246 - 1342, n=34, last 2 years)
824 Points
Geekbench AI
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 4122, n=43, last 2 years)
591 Points +209%
Motorola Edge 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288
191 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
  (n=1)
191 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
122 Points -36%
Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 32120, n=43, last 2 years)
2213 Points +1053%
Motorola Edge 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288
192 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
  (n=1)
192 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
122 Points -36%
Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1
Average of class Smartphone
  (118 - 44381, n=43, last 2 years)
3296 Points +610%
Motorola Edge 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288
464 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
  (n=1)
464 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
444 Points -4%
Motorola Edge 50Motorola Edge 40OnePlus Nord 4Google Pixel 8aSamsung Galaxy A55 5GAverage 512 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
26%
110%
-24%
4%
-11%
49%
Sequential Read 256KB
1002.6
1876.88
87%
3592.8
258%
1509.65
51%
1688.53
68%
Sequential Write 256KB
909.6
1587.93
75%
2898.2
219%
255.31
-72%
831.44
-9%
Random Read 4KB
296.6
235.66
-21%
250.4
-16%
165.98
-44%
351.47
18%
Random Write 4KB
358.3
229.44
-36%
276.2
-23%
243.82
-32%
132.11
-63%

Temperature

Max. Load
 52.4 °C
126 F
49.9 °C
122 F
46.7 °C
116 F
 
 52 °C
126 F
49.9 °C
122 F
46.2 °C
115 F
 
 51.8 °C
125 F
49.7 °C
121 F
46.4 °C
116 F
 
Maximum: 52.4 °C = 126 F
Average: 49.4 °C = 121 F
47.9 °C
118 F
51.8 °C
125 F
48.6 °C
119 F
47.3 °C
117 F
50.2 °C
122 F
51.3 °C
124 F
45.4 °C
114 F
51.6 °C
125 F
55.9 °C
133 F
Maximum: 55.9 °C = 133 F
Average: 50 °C = 122 F
Power Supply (max.)  45.2 °C = 113 F | Room Temperature 20 °C = 68 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 49.4 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 52.4 °C / 126 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 55.9 °C / 133 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.7 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.


Heat map front
Heat map front
Heat map back
Heat map back

3DMark Stress Test

051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Motorola Edge 50 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø4.95 (4.94-4.96)
Motorola Edge 40 Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø7.53 (7.51-7.56)
OnePlus Nord 4 Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø12.2 (9.82-17)
Google Pixel 8a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø9.87 (7.57-14.8)
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø5.59 (5.56-5.63)
Motorola Edge 50 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø18.7 (18.7-18.7)
Motorola Edge 40 Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø26.6 (26.5-26.7)
OnePlus Nord 4 Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø43.4 (36.9-61.1)
Google Pixel 8a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø33.9 (26-50.6)
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø23.1 (23.1-23.1)
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø23.7 (23.6-23.7)
Motorola Edge 50 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø2.05 (2.04-2.06)
OnePlus Nord 4 Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.0.15: Ø5.8 (3.85-7.27)
Google Pixel 8a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.0.15: Ø5.33 (3.92-7.24)
Motorola Edge 50 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø2.06 (2.05-2.08)
OnePlus Nord 4 Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.0.15: Ø6.47 (3.86-7.27)

Speakers

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2046.446.52546.143.33138.834.54040.737.75045.342.56334.532.38030.126.9100303312531.23816024.54420021.449.625019.655.631519.760.240018.46250018.667.263021.272.180023.272.8100021.174.5125016.580160017.179.2200016.577.5250016.178.6315016.577.5400016.777.1500017.174.9630017.170.680001769.31000016.9741250016.779.51600015.867.9SPL30.788.5N1.573.8median 17.1median 72.8Delta2.39.127.333.426.235.525.938.429.240.335.642.325.935.822.14117.840.517.146.518.157.414.255.214.15610.758.61159.312.863.711.164.61271.111.774.71279.312.877.412.479.512.379.713.3821384.213.581.613.278.913.878.213.776.113.469.313.360.624.991.40.685.1median 13.2median 74.719.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMotorola Edge 50Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Motorola Edge 50 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy A55 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.4% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Runtimes

Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
5000 mAh
1077 min +11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (575 - 3244, n=202, last 2 years)
1066 min +10%
OnePlus Nord 4
5500 mAh
998 min +3%
Motorola Edge 50
5000 mAh
966 min
Motorola Edge 40
4400 mAh
924 min -4%
Google Pixel 8a
4492 mAh
796 min -18%
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
16h 06min

Pros

+ stable and attractive case
+ relatively lightweight
+ fast 6-GHz WLAN
+ accurate location services
+ precise operation
+ extensive camera setup
+ bright and color-accurate display
+ fast charging

Cons

- heats up considerably under load
- poor update promise
- comparatively low performance
- makes little use of its large battery

Verdict – The Edge 50 is good, but its SoC is tripping it up

Motorola Edge 50 review.
Motorola Edge 50 review.

The Motorola Edge 50 features a design and a storage configuration that wouldn't look out of place on much more expensive phones. This includes fast 6 GHz Wi-Fi, a large battery, a powerful zoom camera system and wireless charging functionality. Its precise location services and bright screen are also fun.

Even so, Motorola has made savings when it comes to the phone's SoC and memory modules, and you can really tell when using the Edge 50: Although you can navigate through the system smoothly most of the time, the phone falters with more complex apps and gaming at more than 30fps is hardly possible when running demanding games.

It is also a mystery why Motorola has promised longer updates for its cheaper Edge 50 Neo than for its more expensive devices. You'll only get updates for a standard period of 3 years. It also still has some catching up to do when it comes to sustainability criteria such as self-repair.

If you're on the hunt for a high-quality mid-range device that wouldn't be out of place amongst high-end phones, then the Motorola Edge 50 could be the one for you. However, it doesn't boast the highest performance.

If your smartphone needs to be a little more compact, then the cheaper Edge 50 Neo—also from Motorola—could be a good alternative. The Samsung Galaxy A55 5G offers significantly longer runtimes.

Price and availability

At the time of writing, the Motorola Edge 50 is not yet available to purchase in the United States.

Please note: We have updated our rating system and the results of version 8 are not comparable with the results of version 7. More information is available here.

Motorola Edge 50 - 10/18/2024 v8
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
87%
Keyboard
65 / 75 → 87%
Pointing Device
94%
Connectivity
47 / 69 → 68%
Weight
90%
Battery
91%
Display
90%
Games Performance
14 / 55 → 25%
Application Performance
66 / 85 → 77%
AI Performance
13%
Temperature
77%
Noise
100%
Audio
82 / 90 → 91%
Camera
74%
Average
58%
79%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
5%
Packaging
90%
Power Use
50%
Repairability
6%
Software Updates
46.7%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 32.9%

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > Motorola Edge 50 smartphone review – When luxury features meet a mid-range price
Florian Schmitt, 2024-10-19 (Update: 2024-10-19)