Notebookcheck Logo
Teaser

OnePlus Nord 4 smartphone review – Unibody case for little money gives the upper class the jitters

A real metal head. With a high-quality metal case, large battery, and fast charging, the OnePlus Nord 4 has the stuff to become a danger to even flagship smartphones, even though it is already available for less than 500 Euros (~$553). But the new SoC might spoil the party, so we take a more detailed look in our test.
Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by Mark Riege) Published 🇩🇪 🇫🇷 ...
5G Android ARM Smartphone

Welcome back, OnePlus! After the manufacturer was unable to do business in Germany for a longer time period - due to a lost patent law case - the devices are now more widely available again, and with the OnePlus Nord 4, a very interesting smartphone has hit the shelves. 

Designed as a high-quality midrange smartphone, it might also attract some high-class buyers - at least it looks good enough, and the equipment also turns out to have a high quality.

We already called the OnePlus Nord 3 an "impressive improvement compared to the Nord 2" in our test, and now we'll take a detailed look whether the OnePlus Nord 4 succeeds in making another great leap ahead.

OnePlus Nord 4 (Nord Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 8 x 1.9 - 2.8 GHz, Cortex-X4, A720, A520
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 732, Core: 950 MHz
Memory
16 GB 
Display
6.74 inch 20:9, 2772 x 1240 pixel 451 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, AMOLED, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 512 GB 
, 495 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: audio via USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration sensor, gyroscope, proximity sensor, compass
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.4, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B4/​B5/​B6/​B8/​B19), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B17/​B18/​B19/​B20/​B26/​B28/​B38/​B39/​B40/​B41/​B66), 5G (n1/​n2/​n3/​n5/​n7/​n8/​n12/​n20/​n28/​n38/​n40/​n41/​n66/​n77/​n78) , Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8 x 162.6 x 75 ( = 0.31 x 6.4 x 2.95 in)
Battery
5500 mAh Lithium-Ion, 100 Watt charging
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 14
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix f/​1.8, phase comparison AF, contrast AF, OIS, dual LED flash, videos @2160p/​60fps (camera 1); 8.0MP, f/​2.2, wide angle lens (camera 2)
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix f/​2.4, videos @1080p/​30fps
Additional features
Speakers: stereo speakers (hybrid), charging cable, SIM tool, 24 Months Warranty, IP65 certified, fanless
Weight
199.5 g ( = 7.04 oz / 0.44 pounds) ( = 0 oz / 0 pounds)
Price
549 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible Competitors in Comparison

Rating
Version
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
80.9 %v8
09/2024
OnePlus Nord 4
SD 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732
199.5 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.74"2772x1240
88.2 %v7 (old)
07/2023
OnePlus Nord 3
Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10
193.5 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.74"2772x1240
87.6 %v7 (old)
05/2024
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
SD 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720
186 g512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.70"2712x1220
87.4 %v7 (old)
05/2024
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530
213 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.60"2340x1080
81.9 %v8
07/2024
Google Pixel 8a
Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7
188 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.10"2400x1080

Note that we updated our rating system and the results of version 8 are not comparable with those of version 7. You can find additional information on this here.

Case – An excellent case made of one piece

The three color versions of the OnePlus Nord 4.
The three color versions of the OnePlus Nord 4.

The OnePlus Nord 4 is available in three color versions. The color of our test unit is called Oasis Green, which varies between green and blue and has a smooth back. You can also get Obsidian Midnight, which is a simple dark gray also with a smooth back cover, and Mercurial Silver as a metal-colored version with a rippled back.

The top quarter is covered with glass and houses the two camera lenses. The rest of the back together with the frame is milled from a single piece of aluminum and looks very elegant.

The smartphone has a very stable build and offers very clean workmanship, which increases the high-quality first impression. The smartphone doesn't mind pressure from the fingers and also cannot be warped using both hands. The Nord 4 offers an IP65 certification, which makes it fairly resistant against dust and even some heavy rain shouldn't create any problems, although it cannot be submerged under water.

The bezels in front are very slim, and a protective screen cover is applied in the state of delivery. Considering its size, the OnePlus Nord 4 isn't too heavy at less than 200 grams (~7 oz), although there are also significantly lighter phones such as the Motorola Edge 50 Pro. The dimensions are at the class level, and the case thickness of only 8 millimeters (~0.3 in) is particularly impressive.

Size Comparison

162.6 mm / 6.4 in 75.1 mm / 2.96 in 8.1 mm / 0.3189 in 193.5 g0.4266 lbs162.6 mm / 6.4 in 75 mm / 2.95 in 8 mm / 0.315 in 199.5 g0.4398 lbs161.2 mm / 6.35 in 72.4 mm / 2.85 in 8.2 mm / 0.3228 in 186 g0.4101 lbs161.1 mm / 6.34 in 77.4 mm / 3.05 in 8.2 mm / 0.3228 in 213 g0.4696 lbs152.2 mm / 5.99 in 72.7 mm / 2.86 in 8.9 mm / 0.3504 in 188 g0.4145 lbs148 mm / 5.83 in 105 mm / 4.13 in 1 mm / 0.03937 in 1.5 g0.00331 lbs

Equipment – Optionally with a lot of storage

The OnePlus Nord 4 is available in two storage versions:

  • 256 GB storage / 12 GB RAM – 499 Euros (~$552)
  • 512 GB storager / 16 GB RAM – 549 Euros (~$607)

With this, the 256-GB version remains at the same price level as its predecessor, while you can get the new, larger storage version for a fair additional 50 Euros (~$55). On the other hand, the more affordable 128-GB storage version won't be available anymore, so that the lowest price of the OnePlus Nord 4 is now 50 Euros higher than that of the OnePlus Nord 3.

Its infrared blaster also allows you to use the smartphone as a remote control for other devices. NFC for mobile payment or data transfer is also included. However, the USB-C port is internally only connected according to the USB-2.0 standard, so you have to make do without display output or faster data transfers. 

Another feature that is lacking is eSIM support and there is also no slot for a microSD, but OnePlus traditionally didn't have a high opinion of that anyways.

Bottom: SIM slot, microphone, USB-C port, speaker
Bottom: SIM slot, microphone, USB-C port, speaker
Top: microphone, infrared sensor
Top: microphone, infrared sensor
Right: standby key, volume rocker
Right: standby key, volume rocker
Left: notification key
Left: notification key

Software – Unfortunately with preinstalled bloatware

OnePlus uses its in-house OxygenOS 14.1, which for the last few generations has been reminding us strongly of ColorOS. This is the operating system of its parent company NNK Electronics, which owns realme, Vivo, and Oppo, among others. The OS is based on Android 14, with the security patches of July 2024, which is still fairly current at the time of this test.

The manufacturer promises four Android updates up to Android 18 and 6 years of security updates. In addition, it possesses a (German) TÜV certification that the device should still run smoothly in 6 years.

You have to live with several preinstalled third-party apps for advertising and gaming, but you can also uninstall them easily.

Sustainability

Its fairly long period of software updates already earns the OnePlus Nord 4 some positive points in its sustainability rating. The packaging is made of cardboard without including a lot of plastic, and for the printing on the box, soy-based instead of oil-based inks were used.

Unfortunately, OnePlus hasn't published any sustainability reports since 2020, which makes the company's efforts appear less credible. There is no data available on the CO2 emissions during production or the life cycle of the smartphone.

A link to the official parts vendor is very difficult to find and we only found it via the search engine. At this point, there are no parts for the OnePlus Nord 4 available yet, although the device is already listed in their database.

There is currently no online repair manual available yet. The ifixit.com repair community only offers repair instructions for older devices, so there appears to be no official cooperation with the manufacturer here.

Communication and GNSS – No 6-GHz WLAN

The OnePlus Nord 4 supports WiFi 6 as its fastest standard, so you have to make do without the lesser used and thus often faster 6-GHz band for wireless network connections. Since the SoC would already include support for WiFi 7, the manufacturer purposefully chose to forego the support of the more modern standard.

The speeds in the tests with our Asus ROG Rapture AXE11000 router remain fairly stable around 900 Mbit/s when receiving. While this allows you to make fairly good use of a Gigabit Internet connection, there are also significantly faster smartphones for internal network data transfer in this price class.

You get full reception close to the router, but at a 10-meter (~33 ft) distance and through three walls, you only get half the signal strength, and it takes considerably longer to load websites than near the router.

The number of 4G and 5G frequency bands the smartphone is capable of using for communication in the mobile networks doesn't leave much to be desired. The OnePlus Nord 4 can be used all over the world.

We take a closer look at the smartphone's reception by repeatedly and randomly comparing the signal quality with that of high-end phones. The OnePlus Nord 4 does a good job here and often performs at the same level with more expensive smartphones.

Networking
OnePlus Nord 4
iperf3 receive AXE11000
893 (min: 779) MBit/s ∼56%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
533 (min: 459) MBit/s ∼36%
OnePlus Nord 3
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1581 (min: 1484) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1488 (min: 1308) MBit/s ∼100%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1600 (min: 1384) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1081 (min: 838) MBit/s ∼80%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
iperf3 receive AXE11000
823 (min: 704) MBit/s ∼52%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
735 (min: 671) MBit/s ∼49%
Google Pixel 8a
iperf3 receive AXE11000
834 (min: 780) MBit/s ∼53%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
856 (min: 450) MBit/s ∼58%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
521 (min: 418) MBit/s ∼33%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
754 (min: 611) MBit/s ∼56%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 receive AXE11000
687 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼43%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
708 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼48%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1456 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼91%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1344 (min: 668) MBit/s ∼100%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900Tooltip
OnePlus Nord 4; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø893 (779-923)
OnePlus Nord 4; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø533 (459-678)
GPS Test outdoors
GPS Test outdoors
Available satellite networks
Available satellite networks

Outdoors, the OnePlus Nord 4 locates our position quickly and with a good accuracy of 3 meters (~10 ft). All the large satellite networks are supported, but the same is not the case for SBAS, which would give a higher accuracy.

We also perform our practical test, taking the smartphone on a bike ride while also bringing the Garmin Venu 2 smartwatch for comparison. The OnePlus Nord 4 shows a good locating accuracy overall here, but when riding through the woods, the displayed route is to the side of our actual route taken, and it also doesn't always show us on the right side of the road in the city.

Those who don't need absolute locating accuracy should be able to rely on the OnePlus Nord 4 for navigation without any concerns.

OnePlus Nord 4 locating – overview
OnePlus Nord 4 locating – overview
OnePlus Nord 4 locating – turning point
OnePlus Nord 4 locating – turning point
OnePlus Nord 4 locating – city
OnePlus Nord 4 locating – city
Garmin Venu 2 locating – overview
Garmin Venu 2 locating – overview
Garmin Venu 2 locating – turning point
Garmin Venu 2 locating – turning point
Garmin Venu 2 locating – city
Garmin Venu 2 locating – city

Phone Functions and Voice Quality – Crystal clear

For making phone calls, OnePlus uses the Google app that should look familiar to users of many other Android phones. It automatically identifies business callers and also offers all the important calling functions. Optionally, you can also replace it with another phone app.

We really like the voice quality, with our conversation partner sounding clear and present. If necessary, you can also listen at a fairly high volume, although your surroundings can then also hear what is coming from your earpiece. According to our conversation partner, our own voice also sounds crystal clear.

Listening to our conversation partner via speaker phone, the voice also sounds very clear, and our own voice is transferred clearly, even when speaking with a slightly lower voice.

Cameras – In-sensor zoom and 4K videos

Picture taken with the front camera
Picture taken with the front camera

In the camera system, OnePlus removed one lens compared to the predecessor. Even though the lack of the 2-Megapixel macro camera isn't a very great loss, it also means that you can hardly get any sharp closeups anymore.

Nothing has changed in the remaining cameras. As the main camera, a 50-Megapixel sensor that is also supported by optical image stabilization is used. It usually creates 12.5-Megapixel images, and you can only get the full resolution by using a special mode.

The pictures taken with the main camera appear sharp, and the Bokeh effect when taking pictures of objects looks credible. In the image of the surroundings, the details could have been slightly sharper, but we also like the overall quality here. A 2x in-sensor zoom is available again, where a picture is recorded using the full resolution of the sensor and then cut to the selected image section. While this actually results in a significantly better image quality than with a pure digital zoom, it is rarely very useful with its low zoom level.

Under low light conditions and with high contrasts, the main camera does a more mediocre job: On one hand, the picture of the candle flame looks good without the image becoming too dark, but at the same time details are not visible in the darker areas anymore.

Videos can be recorded in 4K resolution at 60 fps. The image quality is attractive with an accurate color reproduction and good sharpness. The autofocus also responds quickly and without becoming noticeable.

The ultra-wide angle camera with 8 Megapixels brightens the scenery well, although the detail level of the pictures isn't very exact.

The front houses a selfie camera with 16 Megapixels that also takes solid pictures and is not confused by some larger differences in brightness within the depicted objects. If you zoom far into the picture, you can see some slight blurriness, and the detail could be better in very dark areas. But we like the selfies overall.

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

PflanzeUmgebungLow LightUltraweitwinkelkameraNahaufnahme

The main camera also has to prove itself in the lab, where we take pictures in full studio light and also at only a single Lux of illumination. In good light conditions, the contrasts could have been even better, and the sharpness is at a medium level.

In very low light, the object is still recognizable, but the sharpness has decreased significantly.

ColorChecker
8.6 ∆E
5 ∆E
14.8 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
15 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
2.1 ∆E
9 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
13 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
ColorChecker OnePlus Nord 4: 8.5 ∆E min: 2.14 - max: 14.98 ∆E
ColorChecker
26.6 ∆E
41.2 ∆E
29.7 ∆E
27.7 ∆E
31.8 ∆E
43.2 ∆E
41.1 ∆E
27 ∆E
29.1 ∆E
23.5 ∆E
46.7 ∆E
47.7 ∆E
23.6 ∆E
37.9 ∆E
23.6 ∆E
40.3 ∆E
30.3 ∆E
32.6 ∆E
44.6 ∆E
45.4 ∆E
39.9 ∆E
30.7 ∆E
22.2 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
ColorChecker OnePlus Nord 4: 33.34 ∆E min: 13.67 - max: 47.72 ∆E

Accessories and Warranty – A lot of accessories available for purchase

In addition to the smartphone itself, the box also includes a USB cable in the iconic red and white design and a SIM tool. At the time of this test, those who order their smartphone directly from the OnePlus online shop (in Germany) will also get a free charger.

OnePlus offers a bunch of accessories on its website, including chargers for 40 to 60 Euros (~$44-66). You can also get a charger for the cigarette lighter in the car for 60 Euros (~$66). Suitable cases in the sandstone design that remind of the OnePlus One or with Aramid fiber are available for 23 to 40 Euros (~$25-44).

OnePlus offers a one-year warranty for its smartphones.

Input Devices and Operation – Reliable control

The 120-Hz screen responds very quickly and accurately to inputs, including in the corners.

On the left side of the case is a physical notification slider key that allows you to quickly mute or un-mute the smartphone. The keys on the right side control the volume or turn the phone on or off. All the keys are made of metal, which gives them a high-quality look. They also offer a very clear pressure point.

The fingerprint sensor is housed beneath the display, placed fairly low toward the bottom, which makes it easy to reach also for users with small hands. It unlocks the phone reliably and almost without any delay at all.

You can also unlock the phone via face recognition, which works very reliably after the initial setup. However, since there is no infrared sensor for more accurate face recognition, this method is slightly less secure against manipulation.

Keyboard - portrait
Keyboard - portrait
Keyboard - landscape
Keyboard - landscape

Display – Very bright and highly resolving

Subpixel grid
Subpixel grid

With a 6.7-inch diagonal, the OnePlus Nord 4 offers a fairly large display. The AMOLED screen has a high resolution at 2772x1240 pixels, allowing for a high level of detail, where you can hardly detect any single pixels with the bare eyes.

In terms of brightness, at more than 1,100 cd/m² with a full white display, the result is also very good. With a smaller area (APL18), we measure an even higher brightness at 1,345 cd/m².

We notice PWM flickering, which at a frequency 119.2 Hz comes close to the refresh rate. The amplitude of the variation is around 12%, which is still within an acceptable range. However, sensitive users should still try out the display before purchasing the smartphone, to make sure that the flickering won't create any problems for them.

1083
cd/m²
1078
cd/m²
1125
cd/m²
1091
cd/m²
1102
cd/m²
1127
cd/m²
1076
cd/m²
1093
cd/m²
1144
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 1144 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1102.1 cd/m² Minimum: 1.96 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 1102 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.43 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.95
ΔE Greyscale 2.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.213
OnePlus Nord 4
AMOLED, 2772x1240, 6.7"
OnePlus Nord 3
AMOLED, 2772x1240, 6.7"
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
P-OLED, 2712x1220, 6.7"
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.6"
Google Pixel 8a
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.1"
Screen
-20%
10%
7%
19%
Brightness middle
1102
481
-56%
1064
-3%
962
-13%
1518
38%
Brightness
1102
478
-57%
1038
-6%
967
-12%
1466
33%
Brightness Distribution
94
91
-3%
88
-6%
99
5%
88
-6%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.43
1.4
2%
1.17
18%
1.6
-12%
1.2
16%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
4.04
3.87
4%
2.47
39%
2.6
36%
3.3
18%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.4
2.6
-8%
2
17%
1.5
37%
2
17%
Gamma
2.213 99%
2.28 96%
2.238 98%
2.13 103%
2.2 100%
CCT
6385 102%
6395 102%
6423 101%
6382 102%
6786 96%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 119.2 Hz
Amplitude: 12 %

The display backlight flickers at 119.2 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 119.2 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17348 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Minimum brightness
Minimum brightness
25% brightness
25% brightness
50% brightness
50% brightness
75% brightness
75% brightness
100% brightness
100% brightness

Measurement series at fixed zoom level and various brightness settings

The accuracy of the display turns out fairly good overall in the colors and grayscale, but full white is displayed with a minimal yellow tint.

The response times turn out average, which would be unconvincing for hardcore gamers. But for all other users, the display should be responsive enough.

CalMAN Grayscale
CalMAN Grayscale
CalMAN Color Accuracy
CalMAN Color Accuracy
CalMAN sRGB Color Space
CalMAN sRGB Color Space
CalMAN AdobeRGB Color Space
CalMAN AdobeRGB Color Space
CalMAN DCI P3 Color Space
CalMAN DCI P3 Color Space
CalMAN Saturation
CalMAN Saturation

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
2.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1 ms rise
↘ 1.3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.1 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.9 ms rise
↘ 9.1 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 19 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.2 ms).

Outdoors, the display can also be read easily on bright days, but direct sunlight will still create some stronger reflections.

The viewing angles are optimal from all sides. While there are some minimal shifts in the brightness at most, the display contents always remain easy to read.

Outdoor use
Outdoor use
Viewing angles
Viewing angles

Performance – Only middling processing power but a high graphics performance

With the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen3, the manufacturer uses a completely new SoC that we haven't tested yet in any other smartphone either. Compared to the MediaTek Dimensity 9000 in the OnePlus Nord 3 from last year, the new SoC is unable to impress in terms of processor performance, which turns out significantly slower, particularly in the single-core performance.

If we look at all the comparison devices in this price range, our test unit places in the middle of the field. Especially smartphones like the Google Pixel 8a show that significantly more power is also possible. The performance in the AI computations is also lower than that of many comparison devices.

In everyday operation, you will still get a mostly smooth system, and only very demanding apps can cause the smartphone to stutter.

Geekbench 6.2
Single-Core
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
1699 Points +45%
OnePlus Nord 3
MediaTek Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10, 16384
1608 Points +38%
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 - 2930, n=143, last 2 years)
1361 Points +17%
OnePlus Nord 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 16384
1168 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3
  ()
1168 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
1157 Points -1%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288
1147 Points -2%
Multi-Core
OnePlus Nord 3
MediaTek Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10, 16384
4482 Points +16%
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
4408 Points +14%
OnePlus Nord 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 16384
3865 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3
  ()
3865 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (845 - 7408, n=143, last 2 years)
3798 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
3456 Points -11%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288
3129 Points -19%
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
1267 Points +45%
OnePlus Nord 3
MediaTek Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10, 16384
1211 Points +38%
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2138, n=183, last 2 years)
935 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
891 Points +2%
OnePlus Nord 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 16384
876 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3
  ()
876 Points 0%
Multi-Core
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
4366 Points +19%
OnePlus Nord 3
MediaTek Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10, 16384
4051 Points +11%
OnePlus Nord 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 16384
3661 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3
  ()
3661 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
3349 Points -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6681, n=183, last 2 years)
3128 Points -15%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (142748 - 2162423, n=82, last 2 years)
1159866 Points +6%
OnePlus Nord 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 16384
1095324 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3
  ()
1095324 Points 0%
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
1049981 Points -4%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288
767395 Points -30%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
740935 Points -32%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288
15165 Points +7%
OnePlus Nord 3
MediaTek Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10, 16384
14915 Points +6%
OnePlus Nord 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 16384
14109 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3
  ()
14109 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
13393 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 21385, n=193, last 2 years)
12453 Points -12%
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
11565 Points -18%
CrossMark - Overall
OnePlus Nord 3
MediaTek Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10, 16384
1051 Points +46%
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
919 Points +27%
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 1474, n=153, last 2 years)
850 Points +18%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
784 Points +9%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288
759 Points +5%
OnePlus Nord 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 16384
722 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3
  ()
722 Points 0%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
OnePlus Nord 3
MediaTek Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10, 16384
7714 Points +12%
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
7088 Points +3%
OnePlus Nord 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 16384
6899 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3
  ()
6899 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 11438, n=153, last 2 years)
6068 Points -12%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288
6028 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
4964 Points -28%
System
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
11778 Points +29%
OnePlus Nord 3
MediaTek Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10, 16384
11650 Points +28%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288
11239 Points +23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 16475, n=153, last 2 years)
9958 Points +9%
OnePlus Nord 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 16384
9114 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3
  ()
9114 Points 0%
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
7828 Points -14%
Memory
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
9837 Points +50%
OnePlus Nord 3
MediaTek Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10, 16384
7602 Points +16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 12716, n=153, last 2 years)
6551 Points 0%
OnePlus Nord 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 16384
6544 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3
  ()
6544 Points 0%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288
5719 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
4109 Points -37%
Graphics
OnePlus Nord 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 16384
23684 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3
  ()
23684 Points 0%
OnePlus Nord 3
MediaTek Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10, 16384
20494 Points -13%
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
18837 Points -20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=153, last 2 years)
15841 Points -33%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288
13308 Points -44%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
8511 Points -64%
Web
OnePlus Nord 3
MediaTek Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10, 16384
1951 Points +22%
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
1762 Points +10%
OnePlus Nord 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 16384
1604 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3
  ()
1604 Points 0%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288
1543 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (747 - 2145, n=153, last 2 years)
1537 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
1474 Points -8%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
29654 Points +173%
OnePlus Nord 3
MediaTek Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10, 16384
29236 Points +169%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 - 78964, n=146, last 2 years)
17406 Points +60%
OnePlus Nord 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 16384
10851 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3
  ()
10851 Points 0%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288
8985 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
5205 Points -52%
AImark - Score v3.x
OnePlus Nord 3
MediaTek Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10, 16384
28688 Points +3437%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 245629, n=129, last 2 years)
18451 Points +2175%
OnePlus Nord 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 16384
811 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3
  ()
811 Points 0%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288
717 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
585 Points -28%
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
Points -100%
Geekbench ML
0.6 TensorFlow Lite CPU
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
998 Points +6%
OnePlus Nord 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 16384
939 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3
  ()
939 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (246 - 1342, n=34, last 2 years)
824 Points -12%
0.6 TensorFlow Lite GPU
OnePlus Nord 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 16384
783 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3
  ()
783 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (123 - 1478, n=33, last 2 years)
746 Points -5%
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
704 Points -10%
0.6 TensorFlow Lite NNAPI
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
2488 Points +872%
Average of class Smartphone
  (186 - 3410, n=29, last 2 years)
647 Points +153%
OnePlus Nord 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 16384
256 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3
  ()
256 Points 0%

On the other hand, those who value a lot of graphics power will get their money's worth with the OnePlus Nord 4: In our benchmarks, the smartphone often places ahead of the pack. Even at higher resolutions such as 1440p, the SoC still allows for playable frame rates.

We take a closer look at the gaming power in our gaming section below.

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
OnePlus Nord 4
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2844 Points
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2385 Points -16%
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2353 Points -17%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1451 Points -49%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
915 Points -68%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
OnePlus Nord 4
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2937 Points
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2373 Points -19%
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2359 Points -20%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1474 Points -50%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
926 Points -68%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
OnePlus Nord 4
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
11512 Points
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8960 Points -22%
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8667 Points -25%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5434 Points -53%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3992 Points -65%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8976 Points
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8394 Points
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4752 Points
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3897 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5850 Points +65%
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5193 Points +47%
OnePlus Nord 4
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3536 Points
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3005 Points -15%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
14498 Points +26%
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
14348 Points +25%
OnePlus Nord 4
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
11506 Points
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7170 Points -38%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10309 Points +34%
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7856 Points +2%
OnePlus Nord 4
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
7666 Points
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6828 Points -11%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps +98%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
116 fps +93%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
111 fps +85%
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps 0%
OnePlus Nord 4
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
OnePlus Nord 4
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
491 fps
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
373 fps -24%
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
297 fps -40%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
174 fps -65%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
134 fps -73%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps +98%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
81 fps +35%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
78 fps +30%
OnePlus Nord 4
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59 fps -2%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
OnePlus Nord 4
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
271 fps
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
241 fps -11%
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
218 fps -20%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
107 fps -61%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
95 fps -65%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98 fps +63%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
60 fps 0%
OnePlus Nord 4
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59 fps -2%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
57 fps -5%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
OnePlus Nord 4
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
191 fps
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
154 fps -19%
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
117 fps -39%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
84 fps -56%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
67 fps -65%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
75 fps +25%
OnePlus Nord 4
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
53 fps -12%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
32 fps -47%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
31 fps -48%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
OnePlus Nord 4
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
105 fps
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
81 fps -23%
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
74 fps -30%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
36 fps -66%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
OnePlus Nord 4
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59 fps -2%
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
43 fps -28%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
27 fps -55%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
27 fps -55%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
OnePlus Nord 4
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
49 fps
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
43 fps -12%
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
36 fps -27%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
23 fps -53%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
19 fps -61%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
81 fps +35%
OnePlus Nord 4
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
56 fps -7%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
42 fps -30%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
40 fps -33%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
OnePlus Nord 4
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
130 fps
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
103 fps -21%
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
96 fps -26%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
57 fps -56%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
49 fps -62%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
OnePlus Nord 4
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
22 fps
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
19 fps -14%
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
16 fps -27%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
11 fps -50%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7.9 fps -64%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
989 Points +2%
OnePlus Nord 4
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
966 Points
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
994 Points +2%
OnePlus Nord 4
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
979 Points

Surfing the Internet, the performance of the OnePlus Nord 4 is mediocre overall. At times, it is only sufficient for placing last in the benchmarks, but sometimes the smartphone also performs at the head of the pack.

Some larger websites can take their time until all the content and pictures are loaded when scrolling quickly. But overall, the OnePlus Nord 4 allows for some fairly smooth Internet surfing.

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
OnePlus Nord 3 (Chrome 114)
148.56 Points +24%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G (Chrome 123)
131.393 Points +10%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro (Chrome 124)
123.193 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 ()
119.9 Points 0%
OnePlus Nord 4 (Chrome 127)
119.886 Points
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=159, last 2 years)
111.4 Points -7%
Google Pixel 8a (Chrome 126)
94.765 Points -21%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Google Pixel 8a (Chrome 126)
161 runs/min +50%
OnePlus Nord 3 (Chrome 114)
151 runs/min +41%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro (Chrome 124)
147 runs/min +37%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 445, n=147, last 2 years)
119.3 runs/min +11%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G (Chrome 123)
116 runs/min +8%
OnePlus Nord 4 (Chrome 127)
107 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 ()
107 runs/min 0%
Speedometer 3.0 - Score
OnePlus Nord 4 (Chrome 127)
11 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 ()
11 runs/min 0%
Google Pixel 8a (Chrome 126)
10.5 runs/min -5%
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 16.2, n=44, last 2 years)
8.13 runs/min -26%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro (Chrome 124)
7.04 runs/min -36%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G (Chrome 123)
6.3 runs/min -43%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
OnePlus Nord 3 (Chrome 114)
153 Points +39%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G (Chrome 123)
126 Points +15%
OnePlus Nord 4 (Chrome 127)
110 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 ()
110 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 212, n=150, last 2 years)
105.9 Points -4%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro (Chrome 124)
103 Points -6%
Google Pixel 8a (Chrome 126)
95 Points -14%
Octane V2 - Total Score
OnePlus Nord 4 (Chrome 127)
55668 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 ()
55668 Points 0%
OnePlus Nord 3 (Chrome 114)
50714 Points -9%
Google Pixel 8a (Chrome 126)
46738 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G (Chrome 123)
41576 Points -25%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro (Chrome 124)
39130 Points -30%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 89112, n=202, last 2 years)
34402 Points -38%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 28190, n=158, last 2 years)
1676 ms * -45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 ()
1153 ms * -0%
OnePlus Nord 4 (Chrome 127)
1152.9 ms *
Motorola Edge 50 Pro (Chrome 124)
1150 ms * -0%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G (Chrome 123)
1012.6 ms * +12%
Google Pixel 8a (Chrome 126)
886.7 ms * +23%
OnePlus Nord 3 (Chrome 114)
847.9 ms * +26%

* ... smaller is better

None of the other comparison devices offer UFS 4.0 storage, so OnePlus landed a real coup here: The currently fastest UFS storage is otherwise only used in some really high-end devices. It allows you to read and write large amounts of data quickly, and load times can be shortened.

In random reads, so particularly with smaller files that are spread across the whole storage, there are no speed advantages compared to other UFS versions, though.

OnePlus Nord 4OnePlus Nord 3Motorola Edge 50 ProSamsung Galaxy A55 5GGoogle Pixel 8aAverage 512 GB UFS 4.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-11%
-15%
-34%
-49%
33%
-24%
Sequential Read 256KB
3592.8
1617.78
-55%
1023.6
-72%
1688.53
-53%
1509.65
-58%
Sequential Write 256KB
2898.2
1525.8
-47%
1025.9
-65%
831.44
-71%
255.31
-91%
Random Read 4KB
250.4
308.68
23%
337
35%
351.47
40%
165.98
-34%
Random Write 4KB
276.2
376.9
36%
390.2
41%
132.11
-52%
243.82
-12%

Games – Gaming like with the big league

In the three mobile games that we tested, the OnePlus Nord 4 revealed an above-average performance for its price class. If you set the graphics details to the minimum in Genshin Impact, even a stable 87 fps are possible. Diablo Immortal runs very stably and smoothly at 60 fps.

You can also reach a smooth 58 frames, if you forgo the best graphics in Genshin Impact, but even around 40 fps are still possible if you use the high settings. Some high-end smartphones can learn a thing or two from the OnePlus here.

We measure the frame rates using the software from GameBench.

So overall, gaming is easily possible on the OnePlus Nord 4, even at high quality levels.

PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
Genshin Impact
Genshin Impact
0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
OnePlus Nord 4; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps: Ø58.1 (50-60)
OnePlus Nord 4; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps: Ø40.7 (33-45)
OnePlus Nord 4; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø87.1 (80-90)
OnePlus Nord 4; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD: Ø39.4 (35-41)
OnePlus Nord 4; Diablo Immortal; Medium Mobile Low: Ø59.9 (57-61)
OnePlus Nord 4; Diablo Immortal; Ultra Mobile Very High: Ø59.7 (56-62)

Emissions – It can get really hot

Temperature

We measure up to 47.5 °C (117.5 °F) of heat development on the case with the system under heavy load. This is clearly noticeable and can get even hotter on hot days outdoors.

OnePlus often had problems with the cooling of its smartphones already in the past, with benchmarks getting aborted automatically in order to allow the device to cool. Although the same doesn't happen this time, the drop in performance is clearly noticeable already after a short time. While the system tries to go back to its full performance again after that, it only succeeds for a short time.

Max. Load
 47.5 °C
118 F
43.9 °C
111 F
41.7 °C
107 F
 
 47.3 °C
117 F
44 °C
111 F
41.4 °C
107 F
 
 46.7 °C
116 F
44.6 °C
112 F
41.5 °C
107 F
 
Maximum: 47.5 °C = 118 F
Average: 44.3 °C = 112 F
40.3 °C
105 F
42.7 °C
109 F
41 °C
106 F
41 °C
106 F
42.7 °C
109 F
42 °C
108 F
41.3 °C
106 F
42.6 °C
109 F
43.8 °C
111 F
Maximum: 43.8 °C = 111 F
Average: 41.9 °C = 107 F
Power Supply (max.)  42.3 °C = 108 F | Room Temperature 21 °C = 70 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 44.3 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47.5 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.8 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.7 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.7 % +65%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
88.6 % +47%
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
83 % +37%
OnePlus Nord 4
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60.4 %
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
51.4 % -15%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.3 % +72%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98.9 % +72%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
98.8 % +72%
OnePlus Nord 4
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
57.6 %
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
51.3 % -11%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
54.1 % +2%
OnePlus Nord 4
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
53 %
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
OnePlus Nord 4 Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø12.2 (9.82-17)
OnePlus Nord 3 Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø14.2 (14.1-14.2)
Motorola Edge 50 Pro Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø8.78 (8.73-8.83)
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø5.59 (5.56-5.63)
Google Pixel 8a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø9.87 (7.57-14.8)
OnePlus Nord 4 Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø43.4 (36.9-61.1)
OnePlus Nord 3 Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø49.2 (42.7-51.5)
Motorola Edge 50 Pro Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø29.7 (28.6-32.3)
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø23.1 (23.1-23.1)
Google Pixel 8a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø33.9 (26-50.6)
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø23.7 (23.6-23.7)
OnePlus Nord 4 Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.0.15: Ø5.8 (3.85-7.27)
Google Pixel 8a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.0.15: Ø5.33 (3.92-7.24)
Heatmap front
Heatmap front
Heatmap back
Heatmap back

Speakers

In addition to a dedicated speaker at the bottom edge, the earpiece is also used as a speaker, allowing the OnePlus Nord 4 to create a light stereo effect. The sound is very attractive for a midrange smartphone. Even some lower mids are audible, giving the speakers a fuller and warmer sound.

While you can easily enjoy some pop music on the smartphone, when listening to classical music, you might have to turn the volume slightly lower, so you won't be able to hear every instrument in the orchestra. These are some very small speakers, after all.

Those who prefer to use headphones or external speakers can connect them via Bluetooth or the USB-C port. Both methods work without any problems in our test. The following wireless Bluetooth codecs for audio transfer are supported: SBC, AAC, Qualcomm aptX, aptX HD, LDAC, LHDC, aptX Adaptive and aptX TWS+. You have to make do without some of the more exotic codecs such as LC3 or Opus.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.6412538.2353129.223.44031.229.5503940.76324.523.48018.719.410023.326.712517.334.316014.743.920010.449.625012.551.731512.356.44009.660.850010.162.763013.463.28001364.1100015.565.3125010.665.7160010.373.4200010.775.2250011.272.7315013.171.5400013.665.5500014.666.4630014.472.9800015.4711000016.373.31250016.367.6160001752SPL25.682.8N0.753median 13.4median 65.3Delta2.39.533.229.731.83118.224.423.427.532.436.619.428.618.825.417.630.613.841.615.956.51654.316.456.815.161.513.864.112.97213.873.513.574.313.175.713.874.712.570.21372.313.274.714.577.413.482.5148315.276.51571.313.674.41772.515.564.72689.30.778.4median 13.8median 72.516.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseOnePlus Nord 4Google Pixel 8a
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
OnePlus Nord 4 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Google Pixel 8a audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Battery Life - Efficient smartphone with a good battery life

Power Consumption

In terms of power consumption, the OnePlus Nord 4 shows itself fairly efficient as long as you don't demand a high performance. At a maximum of 1.5 watts, we even measure the lowest maximum consumption in idle mode among our comparison devices.

But as soon as the system has to do some work, the power consumption increases drastically, reaching one of the highest values in our comparison field with up to 11.3 watts.

The phone can be charged at up to 100 watts, but the corresponding charger is not included. Using the SuperVOOC charger that we already had, it takes about 35 minutes to completely recharge the battery from 0 to 100%. You can also get enough power for several hours of regular operation after charging for a few minutes.

However, it is still annoying that there continues to be no option to charge the smartphone wirelessly.

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.9 / 1.1 / 1.5 Watt
Load midlight 6.7 / 11.3 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
OnePlus Nord 4
5500 mAh
OnePlus Nord 3
5000 mAh
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
4500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
5000 mAh
Google Pixel 8a
4492 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-38%
9%
-4%
-12%
0%
-3%
Idle Minimum *
0.9
1.46
-62%
0.9
-0%
0.85
6%
0.92
-2%
0.9 ?()
-0%
Idle Average *
1.1
1.84
-67%
1.3
-18%
1.51
-37%
1.46
-33%
1.1 ?()
-0%
Idle Maximum *
1.5
2.14
-43%
1.6
-7%
1.71
-14%
1.65
-10%
1.5 ?()
-0%
Load Average *
6.7
8.64
-29%
4.8
28%
4.87
27%
7.96
-19%
6.7 ?()
-0%
Load Maximum *
11.3
9.99
12%
6.7
41%
11.73
-4%
10.74
5%
11.3 ?()
-0%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678Tooltip
OnePlus Nord 4; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.68 (0.881-8.63)
OnePlus Nord 4; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.906 (0.806-1.147)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

01234567891011Tooltip
OnePlus Nord 4; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø11 (10.3-11.3)
OnePlus Nord 4; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.906 (0.806-1.147)

Battery Life

With a 5,500 mAh capacity, our test unit has the most powerful battery in our comparison field, increasing its battery capacity by 10% compared to its OnePlus Nord 3 predecessor.

This also becomes noticeable in the battery life, which turns out very good: Even though 16:38 hours of surfing in the WLAN aren't a record, they still tell us that the smartphone can also last through two days of regular usage at times without getting recharged.

You can even watch movies from the internal storage for much longer: Lasting 23:45 hours, watching all the Harry Potter movies in a row shouldn't pose any problems for the battery, and there should even be enough power left to watch one or two more movies.

You can play demanding games for more than 6 hours, before the smartphone needs to be recharged again.

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
34h 34min
WiFi Websurfing
16h 38min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
23h 45min
Load (maximum brightness)
6h 04min
OnePlus Nord 4
5500 mAh
OnePlus Nord 3
5000 mAh
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
4500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
5000 mAh
Google Pixel 8a
4492 mAh
Battery Runtime
-4%
-12%
-5%
-24%
Reader / Idle
2074
1755
-15%
1895
-9%
2202
6%
1803
-13%
H.264
1425
1725
21%
1120
-21%
1511
6%
1132
-21%
WiFi v1.3
998
815
-18%
979
-2%
1077
8%
796
-20%
Load
364
350
-4%
302
-17%
220
-40%
211
-42%

Pros

+ very high-quality unibody case
+ fast storage
+ good battery life
+ promise of long update period
+ a lot of gaming power
+ bright AMOLED display

Cons

- processor is a bit slow
- no wireless charging
- no eSIM support
- slow USB-2.0 port
- no real optical zoom
- preinstalled bloatware
- white balance could be more accurate

Verdict – High-quality and a real gamer

Testing the OnePlus Nord 4. Test unit provided by OnePlus Europe.
Testing the OnePlus Nord 4. Test unit provided by OnePlus Europe.

The OnePlus Nord 4 looks quite impressive: With its unibody case, the slim bezels around the display, and the faultless workmanship, it doesn't have to hide from smartphones that cost twice as much.

The very fast storage, high charging performance, bright OLED display, large battery, and long promise of updates also add to the impression of some luxury.

But if you take a closer look at the equipment, you can see that it is positioned in the midrange rather than in the high-end segment: There is no wireless charging, no optical zoom, only WiFi 6 as its fastest WLAN standard, a lame USB-2.0 port, and a lack of modern equipment such as ultra-wide band connections. The case lacks better water proofing. And in terms of the performance, we even see some steps back compared to the predecessor.

On the other hand, what you get with the Nord 4 is a lot of gaming power. OnePlus has performed some really good optimizations here, allowing even for almost 90 fps in PUBG Mobile.

In the end, you have to ask what is really important for you in a smartphone with the OnePlus Nord 4: While it offers many features that you would expect in significantly more expensive smartphones, it also leaves some equipment gaps at the same time.

Thanks to its great case, the OnePlus Nord 4 offers a higher-quality feel than you would expect, seeing its price of around 500 Euros (~$553).

There is no lack in alternatives: At this point, the OnePlus Nord 3 predecessor is already available for much less than 400 Euros (~$443). The Google Pixel 8a is more compact and offers more AI power.

Price and Availability

Although the OnePlus Nord 4 is listed on Amazon.com, it is not compatible with CDMA networks in the US. Worldwide, it is available from Amazon in the UK for £357 and India starting from IRS 30,000, for example. In many countries, you can also purchase it from OnePlus directly.

Note that we updated our rating system and the results from version 8 are not comparable with those from version 7. You can find additional information on this here.

OnePlus Nord 4 - 09/02/2024 v8
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
90%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 90%
Pointing Device
94%
Connectivity
46 / 69 → 66%
Weight
88%
Battery
91%
Display
91%
Games Performance
39 / 55 → 70%
Application Performance
64 / 85 → 75%
AI Performance
39%
Temperature
85%
Noise
100%
Audio
77 / 90 → 85%
Camera
60%
Average
66%
81%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
15%
Packaging
90%
Power Use
96%
Repairability
16%
Software Updates
81.7%
Total Sustainability Score: 49.8%

Transparency

The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.

Price comparison

Read all 1 comments / answer
static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > OnePlus Nord 4 smartphone review – Unibody case for little money gives the upper class the jitters
Florian Schmitt, 2024-09- 3 (Update: 2024-09- 3)