OnePlus Nord 4 smartphone review – Unibody case for little money gives the upper class the jitters
Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by Mark Riege) Published 🇩🇪 🇫🇷 ...
Welcome back, OnePlus! After the manufacturer was unable to do business in Germany for a longer time period - due to a lost patent law case - the devices are now more widely available again, and with the OnePlus Nord 4, a very interesting smartphone has hit the shelves.
Designed as a high-quality midrange smartphone, it might also attract some high-class buyers - at least it looks good enough, and the equipment also turns out to have a high quality.
We already called the OnePlus Nord 3 an "impressive improvement compared to the Nord 2" in our test, and now we'll take a detailed look whether the OnePlus Nord 4 succeeds in making another great leap ahead.
Possible Competitors in Comparison
Rating | Version | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
80.9 % | v8 | 09/2024 | OnePlus Nord 4 SD 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732 | 199.5 g | 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.74" | 2772x1240 | |
88.2 % | v7 (old) | 07/2023 | OnePlus Nord 3 Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10 | 193.5 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.74" | 2772x1240 | |
87.6 % | v7 (old) | 05/2024 | Motorola Edge 50 Pro SD 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720 | 186 g | 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.70" | 2712x1220 | |
87.4 % | v7 (old) | 05/2024 | Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530 | 213 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.60" | 2340x1080 | |
81.9 % | v8 | 07/2024 | Google Pixel 8a Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7 | 188 g | 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.10" | 2400x1080 |
Note that we updated our rating system and the results of version 8 are not comparable with those of version 7. You can find additional information on this here.
Case – An excellent case made of one piece
The OnePlus Nord 4 is available in three color versions. The color of our test unit is called Oasis Green, which varies between green and blue and has a smooth back. You can also get Obsidian Midnight, which is a simple dark gray also with a smooth back cover, and Mercurial Silver as a metal-colored version with a rippled back.
The top quarter is covered with glass and houses the two camera lenses. The rest of the back together with the frame is milled from a single piece of aluminum and looks very elegant.
The smartphone has a very stable build and offers very clean workmanship, which increases the high-quality first impression. The smartphone doesn't mind pressure from the fingers and also cannot be warped using both hands. The Nord 4 offers an IP65 certification, which makes it fairly resistant against dust and even some heavy rain shouldn't create any problems, although it cannot be submerged under water.
The bezels in front are very slim, and a protective screen cover is applied in the state of delivery. Considering its size, the OnePlus Nord 4 isn't too heavy at less than 200 grams (~7 oz), although there are also significantly lighter phones such as the Motorola Edge 50 Pro. The dimensions are at the class level, and the case thickness of only 8 millimeters (~0.3 in) is particularly impressive.
Equipment – Optionally with a lot of storage
The OnePlus Nord 4 is available in two storage versions:
- 256 GB storage / 12 GB RAM – 499 Euros (~$552)
- 512 GB storager / 16 GB RAM – 549 Euros (~$607)
With this, the 256-GB version remains at the same price level as its predecessor, while you can get the new, larger storage version for a fair additional 50 Euros (~$55). On the other hand, the more affordable 128-GB storage version won't be available anymore, so that the lowest price of the OnePlus Nord 4 is now 50 Euros higher than that of the OnePlus Nord 3.
Its infrared blaster also allows you to use the smartphone as a remote control for other devices. NFC for mobile payment or data transfer is also included. However, the USB-C port is internally only connected according to the USB-2.0 standard, so you have to make do without display output or faster data transfers.
Another feature that is lacking is eSIM support and there is also no slot for a microSD, but OnePlus traditionally didn't have a high opinion of that anyways.
Software – Unfortunately with preinstalled bloatware
OnePlus uses its in-house OxygenOS 14.1, which for the last few generations has been reminding us strongly of ColorOS. This is the operating system of its parent company NNK Electronics, which owns realme, Vivo, and Oppo, among others. The OS is based on Android 14, with the security patches of July 2024, which is still fairly current at the time of this test.
The manufacturer promises four Android updates up to Android 18 and 6 years of security updates. In addition, it possesses a (German) TÜV certification that the device should still run smoothly in 6 years.
You have to live with several preinstalled third-party apps for advertising and gaming, but you can also uninstall them easily.
Sustainability
Its fairly long period of software updates already earns the OnePlus Nord 4 some positive points in its sustainability rating. The packaging is made of cardboard without including a lot of plastic, and for the printing on the box, soy-based instead of oil-based inks were used.
Unfortunately, OnePlus hasn't published any sustainability reports since 2020, which makes the company's efforts appear less credible. There is no data available on the CO2 emissions during production or the life cycle of the smartphone.
A link to the official parts vendor is very difficult to find and we only found it via the search engine. At this point, there are no parts for the OnePlus Nord 4 available yet, although the device is already listed in their database.
There is currently no online repair manual available yet. The ifixit.com repair community only offers repair instructions for older devices, so there appears to be no official cooperation with the manufacturer here.
Communication and GNSS – No 6-GHz WLAN
The OnePlus Nord 4 supports WiFi 6 as its fastest standard, so you have to make do without the lesser used and thus often faster 6-GHz band for wireless network connections. Since the SoC would already include support for WiFi 7, the manufacturer purposefully chose to forego the support of the more modern standard.
The speeds in the tests with our Asus ROG Rapture AXE11000 router remain fairly stable around 900 Mbit/s when receiving. While this allows you to make fairly good use of a Gigabit Internet connection, there are also significantly faster smartphones for internal network data transfer in this price class.
You get full reception close to the router, but at a 10-meter (~33 ft) distance and through three walls, you only get half the signal strength, and it takes considerably longer to load websites than near the router.
The number of 4G and 5G frequency bands the smartphone is capable of using for communication in the mobile networks doesn't leave much to be desired. The OnePlus Nord 4 can be used all over the world.
We take a closer look at the smartphone's reception by repeatedly and randomly comparing the signal quality with that of high-end phones. The OnePlus Nord 4 does a good job here and often performs at the same level with more expensive smartphones.
Networking | |
OnePlus Nord 4 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
OnePlus Nord 3 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
Motorola Edge 50 Pro | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz |
|
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
Google Pixel 8a | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz |
|
Average of class Smartphone | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz |
|
Outdoors, the OnePlus Nord 4 locates our position quickly and with a good accuracy of 3 meters (~10 ft). All the large satellite networks are supported, but the same is not the case for SBAS, which would give a higher accuracy.
We also perform our practical test, taking the smartphone on a bike ride while also bringing the Garmin Venu 2 smartwatch for comparison. The OnePlus Nord 4 shows a good locating accuracy overall here, but when riding through the woods, the displayed route is to the side of our actual route taken, and it also doesn't always show us on the right side of the road in the city.
Those who don't need absolute locating accuracy should be able to rely on the OnePlus Nord 4 for navigation without any concerns.
Phone Functions and Voice Quality – Crystal clear
For making phone calls, OnePlus uses the Google app that should look familiar to users of many other Android phones. It automatically identifies business callers and also offers all the important calling functions. Optionally, you can also replace it with another phone app.
We really like the voice quality, with our conversation partner sounding clear and present. If necessary, you can also listen at a fairly high volume, although your surroundings can then also hear what is coming from your earpiece. According to our conversation partner, our own voice also sounds crystal clear.
Listening to our conversation partner via speaker phone, the voice also sounds very clear, and our own voice is transferred clearly, even when speaking with a slightly lower voice.
Cameras – In-sensor zoom and 4K videos
In the camera system, OnePlus removed one lens compared to the predecessor. Even though the lack of the 2-Megapixel macro camera isn't a very great loss, it also means that you can hardly get any sharp closeups anymore.
Nothing has changed in the remaining cameras. As the main camera, a 50-Megapixel sensor that is also supported by optical image stabilization is used. It usually creates 12.5-Megapixel images, and you can only get the full resolution by using a special mode.
The pictures taken with the main camera appear sharp, and the Bokeh effect when taking pictures of objects looks credible. In the image of the surroundings, the details could have been slightly sharper, but we also like the overall quality here. A 2x in-sensor zoom is available again, where a picture is recorded using the full resolution of the sensor and then cut to the selected image section. While this actually results in a significantly better image quality than with a pure digital zoom, it is rarely very useful with its low zoom level.
Under low light conditions and with high contrasts, the main camera does a more mediocre job: On one hand, the picture of the candle flame looks good without the image becoming too dark, but at the same time details are not visible in the darker areas anymore.
Videos can be recorded in 4K resolution at 60 fps. The image quality is attractive with an accurate color reproduction and good sharpness. The autofocus also responds quickly and without becoming noticeable.
The ultra-wide angle camera with 8 Megapixels brightens the scenery well, although the detail level of the pictures isn't very exact.
The front houses a selfie camera with 16 Megapixels that also takes solid pictures and is not confused by some larger differences in brightness within the depicted objects. If you zoom far into the picture, you can see some slight blurriness, and the detail could be better in very dark areas. But we like the selfies overall.
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
PflanzeUmgebungLow LightUltraweitwinkelkameraNahaufnahmeThe main camera also has to prove itself in the lab, where we take pictures in full studio light and also at only a single Lux of illumination. In good light conditions, the contrasts could have been even better, and the sharpness is at a medium level.
In very low light, the object is still recognizable, but the sharpness has decreased significantly.
Accessories and Warranty – A lot of accessories available for purchase
In addition to the smartphone itself, the box also includes a USB cable in the iconic red and white design and a SIM tool. At the time of this test, those who order their smartphone directly from the OnePlus online shop (in Germany) will also get a free charger.
OnePlus offers a bunch of accessories on its website, including chargers for 40 to 60 Euros (~$44-66). You can also get a charger for the cigarette lighter in the car for 60 Euros (~$66). Suitable cases in the sandstone design that remind of the OnePlus One or with Aramid fiber are available for 23 to 40 Euros (~$25-44).
OnePlus offers a one-year warranty for its smartphones.
Input Devices and Operation – Reliable control
The 120-Hz screen responds very quickly and accurately to inputs, including in the corners.
On the left side of the case is a physical notification slider key that allows you to quickly mute or un-mute the smartphone. The keys on the right side control the volume or turn the phone on or off. All the keys are made of metal, which gives them a high-quality look. They also offer a very clear pressure point.
The fingerprint sensor is housed beneath the display, placed fairly low toward the bottom, which makes it easy to reach also for users with small hands. It unlocks the phone reliably and almost without any delay at all.
You can also unlock the phone via face recognition, which works very reliably after the initial setup. However, since there is no infrared sensor for more accurate face recognition, this method is slightly less secure against manipulation.
Display – Very bright and highly resolving
With a 6.7-inch diagonal, the OnePlus Nord 4 offers a fairly large display. The AMOLED screen has a high resolution at 2772x1240 pixels, allowing for a high level of detail, where you can hardly detect any single pixels with the bare eyes.
In terms of brightness, at more than 1,100 cd/m² with a full white display, the result is also very good. With a smaller area (APL18), we measure an even higher brightness at 1,345 cd/m².
We notice PWM flickering, which at a frequency 119.2 Hz comes close to the refresh rate. The amplitude of the variation is around 12%, which is still within an acceptable range. However, sensitive users should still try out the display before purchasing the smartphone, to make sure that the flickering won't create any problems for them.
|
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 1102 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.43 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.95
ΔE Greyscale 2.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.213
OnePlus Nord 4 AMOLED, 2772x1240, 6.7" | OnePlus Nord 3 AMOLED, 2772x1240, 6.7" | Motorola Edge 50 Pro P-OLED, 2712x1220, 6.7" | Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.6" | Google Pixel 8a AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.1" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | -20% | 10% | 7% | 19% | |
Brightness middle | 1102 | 481 -56% | 1064 -3% | 962 -13% | 1518 38% |
Brightness | 1102 | 478 -57% | 1038 -6% | 967 -12% | 1466 33% |
Brightness Distribution | 94 | 91 -3% | 88 -6% | 99 5% | 88 -6% |
Black Level * | |||||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.43 | 1.4 2% | 1.17 18% | 1.6 -12% | 1.2 16% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.04 | 3.87 4% | 2.47 39% | 2.6 36% | 3.3 18% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.4 | 2.6 -8% | 2 17% | 1.5 37% | 2 17% |
Gamma | 2.213 99% | 2.28 96% | 2.238 98% | 2.13 103% | 2.2 100% |
CCT | 6385 102% | 6395 102% | 6423 101% | 6382 102% | 6786 96% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 119.2 Hz Amplitude: 12 % | ||
The display backlight flickers at 119.2 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 119.2 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17348 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
Measurement series at fixed zoom level and various brightness settings
The accuracy of the display turns out fairly good overall in the colors and grayscale, but full white is displayed with a minimal yellow tint.
The response times turn out average, which would be unconvincing for hardcore gamers. But for all other users, the display should be responsive enough.
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
2.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1 ms rise | |
↘ 1.3 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.1 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.9 ms rise | |
↘ 9.1 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 19 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.2 ms). |
Outdoors, the display can also be read easily on bright days, but direct sunlight will still create some stronger reflections.
The viewing angles are optimal from all sides. While there are some minimal shifts in the brightness at most, the display contents always remain easy to read.
Performance – Only middling processing power but a high graphics performance
With the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen3, the manufacturer uses a completely new SoC that we haven't tested yet in any other smartphone either. Compared to the MediaTek Dimensity 9000 in the OnePlus Nord 3 from last year, the new SoC is unable to impress in terms of processor performance, which turns out significantly slower, particularly in the single-core performance.
If we look at all the comparison devices in this price range, our test unit places in the middle of the field. Especially smartphones like the Google Pixel 8a show that significantly more power is also possible. The performance in the AI computations is also lower than that of many comparison devices.
In everyday operation, you will still get a mostly smooth system, and only very demanding apps can cause the smartphone to stutter.
Antutu v10 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (142748 - 2162423, n=82, last 2 years) | |
OnePlus Nord 4 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 () | |
Google Pixel 8a | |
Motorola Edge 50 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G |
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI | |
Google Pixel 8a | |
OnePlus Nord 3 | |
Average of class Smartphone (1267 - 78964, n=146, last 2 years) | |
OnePlus Nord 4 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 () | |
Motorola Edge 50 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G |
Geekbench ML | |
0.6 TensorFlow Lite CPU | |
Google Pixel 8a | |
OnePlus Nord 4 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 () | |
Average of class Smartphone (246 - 1342, n=34, last 2 years) | |
0.6 TensorFlow Lite GPU | |
OnePlus Nord 4 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 () | |
Average of class Smartphone (123 - 1478, n=33, last 2 years) | |
Google Pixel 8a | |
0.6 TensorFlow Lite NNAPI | |
Google Pixel 8a | |
Average of class Smartphone (186 - 3410, n=29, last 2 years) | |
OnePlus Nord 4 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 () |
On the other hand, those who value a lot of graphics power will get their money's worth with the OnePlus Nord 4: In our benchmarks, the smartphone often places ahead of the pack. Even at higher resolutions such as 1440p, the SoC still allows for playable frame rates.
We take a closer look at the gaming power in our gaming section below.
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark: Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Score
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | |
OnePlus Nord 4 | |
OnePlus Nord 3 | |
Google Pixel 8a | |
Motorola Edge 50 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G |
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme | |
OnePlus Nord 4 | |
OnePlus Nord 3 | |
Google Pixel 8a | |
Motorola Edge 50 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G |
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score | |
OnePlus Nord 4 | |
Google Pixel 8a | |
OnePlus Nord 3 | |
Motorola Edge 50 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G |
3DMark / Wild Life Score | |
Google Pixel 8a | |
OnePlus Nord 3 | |
Motorola Edge 50 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | |
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G | |
OnePlus Nord 3 | |
OnePlus Nord 4 | |
Google Pixel 8a |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | |
Google Pixel 8a | |
OnePlus Nord 3 | |
OnePlus Nord 4 | |
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited | |
OnePlus Nord 3 | |
Google Pixel 8a | |
OnePlus Nord 4 | |
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen | |
Google Pixel 8a | |
Motorola Edge 50 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G | |
OnePlus Nord 3 | |
OnePlus Nord 4 |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen | |
OnePlus Nord 4 | |
Google Pixel 8a | |
OnePlus Nord 3 | |
Motorola Edge 50 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G |
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
Google Pixel 8a | |
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G | |
Motorola Edge 50 Pro | |
OnePlus Nord 4 | |
OnePlus Nord 3 |
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen | |
OnePlus Nord 4 | |
Google Pixel 8a | |
OnePlus Nord 3 | |
Motorola Edge 50 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G |
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
Google Pixel 8a | |
Motorola Edge 50 Pro | |
OnePlus Nord 4 | |
OnePlus Nord 3 | |
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G |
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
OnePlus Nord 4 | |
OnePlus Nord 3 | |
Google Pixel 8a | |
Motorola Edge 50 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G |
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen | |
Google Pixel 8a | |
OnePlus Nord 4 | |
OnePlus Nord 3 | |
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G | |
Motorola Edge 50 Pro |
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen | |
OnePlus Nord 4 | |
OnePlus Nord 3 | |
Google Pixel 8a | |
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
OnePlus Nord 4 | |
Google Pixel 8a | |
OnePlus Nord 3 | |
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G | |
Motorola Edge 50 Pro |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
OnePlus Nord 4 | |
OnePlus Nord 3 | |
Google Pixel 8a | |
Motorola Edge 50 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
Google Pixel 8a | |
OnePlus Nord 4 | |
OnePlus Nord 3 | |
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G | |
Motorola Edge 50 Pro |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
OnePlus Nord 4 | |
OnePlus Nord 3 | |
Google Pixel 8a | |
Motorola Edge 50 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G |
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
OnePlus Nord 4 | |
OnePlus Nord 3 | |
Google Pixel 8a | |
Motorola Edge 50 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G |
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | |
Google Pixel 8a | |
OnePlus Nord 4 |
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score | |
Google Pixel 8a | |
OnePlus Nord 4 |
Surfing the Internet, the performance of the OnePlus Nord 4 is mediocre overall. At times, it is only sufficient for placing last in the benchmarks, but sometimes the smartphone also performs at the head of the pack.
Some larger websites can take their time until all the content and pictures are loaded when scrolling quickly. But overall, the OnePlus Nord 4 allows for some fairly smooth Internet surfing.
Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
OnePlus Nord 3 (Chrome 114) | |
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G (Chrome 123) | |
Motorola Edge 50 Pro (Chrome 124) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 () | |
OnePlus Nord 4 (Chrome 127) | |
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=159, last 2 years) | |
Google Pixel 8a (Chrome 126) |
Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
Google Pixel 8a (Chrome 126) | |
OnePlus Nord 3 (Chrome 114) | |
Motorola Edge 50 Pro (Chrome 124) | |
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 445, n=147, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G (Chrome 123) | |
OnePlus Nord 4 (Chrome 127) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 () |
Speedometer 3.0 - Score | |
OnePlus Nord 4 (Chrome 127) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 () | |
Google Pixel 8a (Chrome 126) | |
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 16.2, n=44, last 2 years) | |
Motorola Edge 50 Pro (Chrome 124) | |
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G (Chrome 123) |
WebXPRT 4 - Overall | |
OnePlus Nord 3 (Chrome 114) | |
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G (Chrome 123) | |
OnePlus Nord 4 (Chrome 127) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 () | |
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 212, n=150, last 2 years) | |
Motorola Edge 50 Pro (Chrome 124) | |
Google Pixel 8a (Chrome 126) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
OnePlus Nord 4 (Chrome 127) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 () | |
OnePlus Nord 3 (Chrome 114) | |
Google Pixel 8a (Chrome 126) | |
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G (Chrome 123) | |
Motorola Edge 50 Pro (Chrome 124) | |
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 89112, n=202, last 2 years) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 28190, n=158, last 2 years) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 () | |
OnePlus Nord 4 (Chrome 127) | |
Motorola Edge 50 Pro (Chrome 124) | |
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G (Chrome 123) | |
Google Pixel 8a (Chrome 126) | |
OnePlus Nord 3 (Chrome 114) |
* ... smaller is better
None of the other comparison devices offer UFS 4.0 storage, so OnePlus landed a real coup here: The currently fastest UFS storage is otherwise only used in some really high-end devices. It allows you to read and write large amounts of data quickly, and load times can be shortened.
In random reads, so particularly with smaller files that are spread across the whole storage, there are no speed advantages compared to other UFS versions, though.
OnePlus Nord 4 | OnePlus Nord 3 | Motorola Edge 50 Pro | Samsung Galaxy A55 5G | Google Pixel 8a | Average 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | -11% | -15% | -34% | -49% | 33% | -24% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 3592.8 | 1617.78 -55% | 1023.6 -72% | 1688.53 -53% | 1509.65 -58% | 3610 ? 0% | 1715 ? -52% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 2898.2 | 1525.8 -47% | 1025.9 -65% | 831.44 -71% | 255.31 -91% | 2940 ? 1% | 1327 ? -54% |
Random Read 4KB | 250.4 | 308.68 23% | 337 35% | 351.47 40% | 165.98 -34% | 393 ? 57% | 265 ? 6% |
Random Write 4KB | 276.2 | 376.9 36% | 390.2 41% | 132.11 -52% | 243.82 -12% | 474 ? 72% | 291 ? 5% |
Games – Gaming like with the big league
In the three mobile games that we tested, the OnePlus Nord 4 revealed an above-average performance for its price class. If you set the graphics details to the minimum in Genshin Impact, even a stable 87 fps are possible. Diablo Immortal runs very stably and smoothly at 60 fps.
You can also reach a smooth 58 frames, if you forgo the best graphics in Genshin Impact, but even around 40 fps are still possible if you use the high settings. Some high-end smartphones can learn a thing or two from the OnePlus here.
We measure the frame rates using the software from GameBench.
So overall, gaming is easily possible on the OnePlus Nord 4, even at high quality levels.
Emissions – It can get really hot
Temperature
We measure up to 47.5 °C (117.5 °F) of heat development on the case with the system under heavy load. This is clearly noticeable and can get even hotter on hot days outdoors.
OnePlus often had problems with the cooling of its smartphones already in the past, with benchmarks getting aborted automatically in order to allow the device to cool. Although the same doesn't happen this time, the drop in performance is clearly noticeable already after a short time. While the system tries to go back to its full performance again after that, it only succeeds for a short time.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47.5 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.8 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.7 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
3DMark Steel Nomad Stress Test
3DMark | |
Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G | |
Motorola Edge 50 Pro | |
OnePlus Nord 3 | |
OnePlus Nord 4 | |
Google Pixel 8a | |
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
OnePlus Nord 3 | |
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G | |
Motorola Edge 50 Pro | |
OnePlus Nord 4 | |
Google Pixel 8a | |
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability | |
Google Pixel 8a | |
OnePlus Nord 4 |
Speakers
In addition to a dedicated speaker at the bottom edge, the earpiece is also used as a speaker, allowing the OnePlus Nord 4 to create a light stereo effect. The sound is very attractive for a midrange smartphone. Even some lower mids are audible, giving the speakers a fuller and warmer sound.
While you can easily enjoy some pop music on the smartphone, when listening to classical music, you might have to turn the volume slightly lower, so you won't be able to hear every instrument in the orchestra. These are some very small speakers, after all.
Those who prefer to use headphones or external speakers can connect them via Bluetooth or the USB-C port. Both methods work without any problems in our test. The following wireless Bluetooth codecs for audio transfer are supported: SBC, AAC, Qualcomm aptX, aptX HD, LDAC, LHDC, aptX Adaptive and aptX TWS+. You have to make do without some of the more exotic codecs such as LC3 or Opus.
OnePlus Nord 4 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Google Pixel 8a audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Battery Life - Efficient smartphone with a good battery life
Power Consumption
In terms of power consumption, the OnePlus Nord 4 shows itself fairly efficient as long as you don't demand a high performance. At a maximum of 1.5 watts, we even measure the lowest maximum consumption in idle mode among our comparison devices.
But as soon as the system has to do some work, the power consumption increases drastically, reaching one of the highest values in our comparison field with up to 11.3 watts.
The phone can be charged at up to 100 watts, but the corresponding charger is not included. Using the SuperVOOC charger that we already had, it takes about 35 minutes to completely recharge the battery from 0 to 100%. You can also get enough power for several hours of regular operation after charging for a few minutes.
However, it is still annoying that there continues to be no option to charge the smartphone wirelessly.
Off / Standby | 0.1 / 0.2 Watt |
Idle | 0.9 / 1.1 / 1.5 Watt |
Load |
6.7 / 11.3 Watt |
OnePlus Nord 4 5500 mAh | OnePlus Nord 3 5000 mAh | Motorola Edge 50 Pro 4500 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A55 5G 5000 mAh | Google Pixel 8a 4492 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -38% | 9% | -4% | -12% | 0% | -3% | |
Idle Minimum * | 0.9 | 1.46 -62% | 0.9 -0% | 0.85 6% | 0.92 -2% | 0.9 ? -0% | 0.91 ? -1% |
Idle Average * | 1.1 | 1.84 -67% | 1.3 -18% | 1.51 -37% | 1.46 -33% | 1.1 ? -0% | 1.441 ? -31% |
Idle Maximum * | 1.5 | 2.14 -43% | 1.6 -7% | 1.71 -14% | 1.65 -10% | 1.5 ? -0% | 1.607 ? -7% |
Load Average * | 6.7 | 8.64 -29% | 4.8 28% | 4.87 27% | 7.96 -19% | 6.7 ? -0% | 6.22 ? 7% |
Load Maximum * | 11.3 | 9.99 12% | 6.7 41% | 11.73 -4% | 10.74 5% | 11.3 ? -0% | 9.17 ? 19% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)
Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)
Battery Life
With a 5,500 mAh capacity, our test unit has the most powerful battery in our comparison field, increasing its battery capacity by 10% compared to its OnePlus Nord 3 predecessor.
This also becomes noticeable in the battery life, which turns out very good: Even though 16:38 hours of surfing in the WLAN aren't a record, they still tell us that the smartphone can also last through two days of regular usage at times without getting recharged.
You can even watch movies from the internal storage for much longer: Lasting 23:45 hours, watching all the Harry Potter movies in a row shouldn't pose any problems for the battery, and there should even be enough power left to watch one or two more movies.
You can play demanding games for more than 6 hours, before the smartphone needs to be recharged again.
OnePlus Nord 4 5500 mAh | OnePlus Nord 3 5000 mAh | Motorola Edge 50 Pro 4500 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A55 5G 5000 mAh | Google Pixel 8a 4492 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -4% | -12% | -5% | -24% | |
Reader / Idle | 2074 | 1755 -15% | 1895 -9% | 2202 6% | 1803 -13% |
H.264 | 1425 | 1725 21% | 1120 -21% | 1511 6% | 1132 -21% |
WiFi v1.3 | 998 | 815 -18% | 979 -2% | 1077 8% | 796 -20% |
Load | 364 | 350 -4% | 302 -17% | 220 -40% | 211 -42% |
Pros
Cons
Verdict – High-quality and a real gamer
The OnePlus Nord 4 looks quite impressive: With its unibody case, the slim bezels around the display, and the faultless workmanship, it doesn't have to hide from smartphones that cost twice as much.
The very fast storage, high charging performance, bright OLED display, large battery, and long promise of updates also add to the impression of some luxury.
But if you take a closer look at the equipment, you can see that it is positioned in the midrange rather than in the high-end segment: There is no wireless charging, no optical zoom, only WiFi 6 as its fastest WLAN standard, a lame USB-2.0 port, and a lack of modern equipment such as ultra-wide band connections. The case lacks better water proofing. And in terms of the performance, we even see some steps back compared to the predecessor.
On the other hand, what you get with the Nord 4 is a lot of gaming power. OnePlus has performed some really good optimizations here, allowing even for almost 90 fps in PUBG Mobile.
In the end, you have to ask what is really important for you in a smartphone with the OnePlus Nord 4: While it offers many features that you would expect in significantly more expensive smartphones, it also leaves some equipment gaps at the same time.
Thanks to its great case, the OnePlus Nord 4 offers a higher-quality feel than you would expect, seeing its price of around 500 Euros (~$553).
There is no lack in alternatives: At this point, the OnePlus Nord 3 predecessor is already available for much less than 400 Euros (~$443). The Google Pixel 8a is more compact and offers more AI power.
Price and Availability
Although the OnePlus Nord 4 is listed on Amazon.com, it is not compatible with CDMA networks in the US. Worldwide, it is available from Amazon in the UK for £357 and India starting from IRS 30,000, for example. In many countries, you can also purchase it from OnePlus directly.
Note that we updated our rating system and the results from version 8 are not comparable with those from version 7. You can find additional information on this here.
OnePlus Nord 4
-
09/02/2024 v8
Florian Schmitt
Transparency
The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.