Realme GT 7T
Specifications

Secondary Camera: 32 MPix f/2.5, 21mm
Price comparison
Average of 12 scores (from 24 reviews)
Reviews for the Realme GT 7T
Source: NDTV Gadgets

The Realme GT 7 is being marketed as a flagship killer phone, and I think that's a fair description. In everyday use, the GT 7 is a beast - whether it's battery, performance, or even the cameras. The AI feature additions make it more up-to-date in terms of the offerings we see from other players in the same price bracket. Design-wise, the GT 7 could have had a USP more than just a graphene back. Out of the two phones, the GT 7T wins the "who's the best-looking phone", and I'm only talking about the Racing Yellow colour variant of the 7T. Of course, if you consider all three GT 7 variants, then Realme GT 7 Dream Edition wins the competition hands down, but it also costs more.
Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 06/06/2025
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 90% performance: 80% display: 90% mobility: 100% workmanship: 80%
Source: Manila Shaker

Overall, for this price, it offers great value. You get a huge battery with ultra-fast charging, a premium and durable build, and solid performance. Even though it’s primarily a gaming device, the camera still holds its own, making it a well-rounded smartphone. Would we recommend it? Yes. If you’re upgrading from an older realme phone or looking for a performance-focused device, the realme GT 7T is a solid choice.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/27/2025
Foreign Reviews
Source: Computerhoy
ES→ENSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/11/2025
Rating: Total score: 85%
Source: HDblog.it
IT→ENSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/06/2025
Rating: price: 66% features: 79%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi
IT→ENSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/30/2025
Rating: Total score: 84% price: 80% display: 85% mobility: 98% workmanship: 85%
Source: Batista70Phone
IT→ENSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/27/2025
Rating: Total score: 80% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Batista70Phone
IT→ENSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/27/2025
Rating: Total score: 80% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Multiplayer IT
IT→ENSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/27/2025
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Tecno Cino
IT→ENPositive: Excellent performance; large and fast ROM; long battery life; quick 120W charging; affordable price.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/27/2025
Source: Journal du Geek
FR→ENComparison, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/15/2025
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Charles Tech
FR→ENSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/14/2025
Rating: Total score: 83% price: 80% performance: 90% display: 100% mobility: 90%
Source: Frandroid
FR→ENSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/25/2025
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 90% workmanship: 90%
Source: Les Mobiles
FR→ENSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/20/2025
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: ITHardware.pl
PL→ENSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/31/2025
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Instalki
PL→ENPositive: Long battery life; quick 120W charging; bright AMOLED display; waterproof IP68/IP69; high performance; great cameras. Negative: No telephoto lens; without LTPO; unsupported eSIM; average speakers; plastic case; mediocre AI Functions.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/11/2025
Source: Co Nowego
PL→ENPositive: Decent performance; beautiful display; long battery life; modern design; affordable price.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/02/2025
Source: Unite4buy
PL→ENPositive: Elegant design; bright AMOLED display; powerful hardware; high performance; impressive autonomy; nice main camera; stereo speakers; 5G; NFC module. Negative: Plastic case; unsupported wireless charging; no telephoto lens; without microSD card slot.
Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 05/30/2025
Source: GSM Maniak
PL→ENPositive: Powerful hardware; high performance; long battery life; quick 120W charging; waterproof IP69; decent speakers; affordable price. Negative: Average cameras.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/30/2025
Source: GSM Online PL
PL→ENPositive: Powerful hardware; high performance; decent display; good speakers; impressive battery capacity; quick 120W charging; modern connectivity. Negative: Average cameras.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/27/2025
Source: Unite4buy
PL→ENPositive: Decent hardware; nice performance; large battery capacity; quick 120W charging; great AMOLED display; modern design; waterproof IP68; good cameras; NFC module; 5G; stereo speakers. Negative: No telephoto lens; without wireless charging; plastic case; lack of MicroSD card slot.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/06/2025
Source: Mobilmania.cz
CZ→ENSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/22/2025
Rating: Total score: 80% features: 70% display: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Arena IT
→ENPositive: Excellent battery life; quick charging; waterproof IP68/IP69; great speakers; powerful hardware; good price. Negative: No optical zoom; poor video recording.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/29/2025
Source: Computerblog.ro
→ENPositive: Decent processor; long battery life; beautiful display; nice cameras; good price. Negative: No zoom optical and 8 megapixel ultrawide; no headphone jack; lack of memory card slot.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/28/2025
Comment
ARM Mali-G720 MP7: High-end graphics chip for smartphones with 7 of the 16 possible cores. Based on the new "5th Gen" architecture (successor to Valhall) including Variable Rate Shading (VRS) and Ray Racing. Compared to the G715, 15% higher performance should be possible at the same clock rates.
Modern games should be playable with these graphics cards at low settings and resolutions. Casual gamers may be happy with these cards.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
Dimensity 8400: The MediaTek Dimensity 8400 operates with eight ARM Cortex-A725 cores based on an "all-big-core design" that relies entirely on performance cores. One ARM Cortex-A725 core operates at 3.25 GHz, three others at 3.0 GHz, while the remaining four cores serve as energy-efficient performance cores and run at up to 2.1 GHz. » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.