Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 5G
Secondary Camera: 24 MPix Pop-up, Dual: 24MP (1/2.8", 0.9µm) + 2MP
Average of 4 scores (from 7 reviews)
Reviews for the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 5G
Now, after half a year, although the existence of the national version, the release time, and the price have not been announced, but with the multiple factors such as the decline in component costs, and the rumored millet 9S 5G version on the road, Xiaomi Mi MIX 3 5G does not return Then, once the return is bound to give a surprising price.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/08/2019
If you can get past the fact the Mi Mix 3 5G will accidentally slide open and start doing stuff when you take it out of your pocket every so often, it’s a great phone and among the most affordable 5G options around. Whether you need a 5G option is another conversation entirely.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/29/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Stuff TV
As with all of the 5G phones we've reviewed, in isolation, the Mi Mix 5G is a great bit of kit, but the premium 5G adds is hard to justify until the service really takes off. We were only able to reach speeds of 250Mbps in our time with the phone, and we had to hunt for 5G in central London. And while we found EE to perform faster than Vodafone in general when we did have 5G signal in London, the service is in its infancy, and both networks are live in a handful of postcodes.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/29/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: PC Advisor
The Mi Mix 3 5G is faster and has a higher-capacity battery than the standard Mi Mix 3, yet weighs only 8g more. And while Vodafone’s 5G network is patchy right now, by the time you’re even halfway through your 24-month contract we should be in a completely different situation in terms of coverage. But are you prepared to pay double dollar for the priviledge of future-proofed connectivity and slightly better performance on an already fast phone?
Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 08/01/2019
Source: PCtipp.ch DE→EN
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/21/2019
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Movil Zona ES→EN
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/18/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Computerblog.ro →EN
Positive: High performance; nice cameras; support 5G; modern design; large battery capacity. Negative: Relatively high price; plastic case; poor display; no microSD card slot; no headphone jack.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/16/2019
CommentQualcomm Adreno 640: Graphics chip for smartphones and tablets that is intergrated within the Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SoC. Qualcomm claims that it is 20% faster than the Adreno 630 in the Snapdragon 845 SoC and offers 50% more compute units (ALUs). Non demanding games should be playable with these graphics cards. » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
855: High-end SoC for smartphones that was introduced in late 2018 and manufactured in 7 nm at TSMC. Integrates one “Prime Core” based on a modified ARM Cortex-A76 architecture clocked at up to 2.84 GHz. Three more performance cores are also based on the A76 but clock up to 2.42 GHz. Furthermore, four energy saving cores are integrated that are based on the ARM Cortex-A55 architecture and clock at up to 1.8 GHz. In addition to the processor cores, the SoC integrates a X24 LTE modem (up to 2 Gigbit download), a new Wi-Fi modem (Wi-Fi 6 ready, 60 GHz mmWave), Hexagon 690 DSP with new Tensor cores for AI processing, a Spectra 380 ISP with an integrated computer vision engine and an integrated LPDDR4x memory controller.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
Only a few smartphones have larger screens.
Large display-sizes allow higher resolutions. So, details like letters are bigger. On the other hand, the power consumption is lower with small screen diagonals and the devices are smaller, more lightweight and cheaper.
This weight is typical for smartphones.
Xiaomi Tech was founded as a Chinese smartphone producer in 2010 and soon reached high market shares in its home market. Although Xiaomi is not one of the Top 5 smartphone manufacturers worldwide in 2016, it is nevertheless one of the big global players in this market segment.
Since 2015 there are many reviews. The ratings have been above average since 2016.
82.5%: This rating should be considered to be average. This is because the proportion of notebooks which have a higher rating is approximately equal to the proportion which have a lower rating.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.