Notebookcheck
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro smartphone review: Lots of power and features at a bargain price

Mid-range sprinter. An excellent price-performance ratio - not only is this characteristic of Xiaomi's Redmi series, but it's even more so when it comes to the manufacturer's Poco smartphones. The Poco X3 Pro is no exception: For 250 Euros (~$305), you get a fast Snapdragon SoC, a 6.7-inch IPS display with 120 Hz, a quad camera, 6 GB of RAM, and 128 GB of UFS 3.1 storage.
Manuel Masiero, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by Stephanie Chamberlain), 🇩🇪 🇳🇱 ...

The equipment list of the Poco X3 Pro is quite impressive considering the starting price of 250 Euros (~$305) that Xiaomi has set for its mid-range smartphone. Two years ago, it would have even passed for a flagship with its specs, since the 6.7-inch device is powered by the Snapdragon 860, a new edition of the Snapdragon 855+, which was used in many high-end devices back then.

The "Pro" in the Poco X3 Pro mainly references the device's power and makes it a kind of performance version of the Poco X3. However, this doesn't mean that corners have been cut in other areas. The features of the Poco X3 Pro include an IPS display with a 120 Hz refresh rate, a quad-camera setup with 48 MP, at least 6 GB of RAM and 128 GB of storage, as well as a 5,120 mAh battery.

The small variant with 6/128 GB of storage is available in the Xiaomi store for 250 Euros (~$305). Alternatively, you can also buy the 8/256 GB version, which costs 300 Euros (~$366).

, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro (Poco X Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 8 x - 3 GHz, Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 485)
Graphics adapter
Memory
6144 MB 
, LPDDR4X
Display
6.67 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 395 PPI, capacitive, IPS, Corning Gorilla Glass 6, glossy: yes, 120 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 107.4 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5 mm audio jack, Card Reader: microSD up to 1 TB (FAT, FAT32, exFAT), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: proximity sensor, accelerometer, gyroscope, electronic compass, 2x2 MIMO, Camera2 API Level 3, DRM Widevine L1, head SAR 0.573 W/kg, body SAR 0.899 W/kg
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (bands 1, 2, 4, 5, 8), 4G/LTE (bands 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 9.4 x 165.3 x 76.8 ( = 0.37 x 6.51 x 3.02 in)
Battery
5160 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix (1/2", f/1.79, 1.6 µm, autofocus); 8 MP ultra wide camera (f/2.2, FOV 119°); 2 MP macro camera (f/2.4); 2 MP depth sensor (f/2.4); videos up to [email protected]
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix f/2.2
Additional features
Speakers: dual, Keyboard: virtual, 33-watt charger, USB cable, SIM tool, protective case, user manual, warranty card, MIUI 12, 12 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
215 g ( = 7.58 oz / 0.47 pounds), Power Supply: 86 g ( = 3.03 oz / 0.19 pounds)
Price
250 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible contenders in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
85 %
05/2021
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
SD 860, Adreno 640
215 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.67"2400x1080
81 %
02/2021
Motorola Moto G 5G
SD 750G 5G, Adreno 619
212 g64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.70"2400x1080
80 %
01/2021
Oppo A73 5G
Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3
177 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.50"2400x1080
82 %
04/2021
realme 8 Pro
SD 720G, Adreno 618
176 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.40"2400x1080
83 %
05/2021
Samsung Galaxy A52
SD 720G, Adreno 618
189 g256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.50"2400x1080
84 %
04/2021
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
SD 732G, Adreno 618
193 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"2400x1080

With 6.67 inches, the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro is a large smartphone, and it's also relatively heavy with 215 grams. With a height of 9.4 millimeters, it isn't among the slimmest ones, either. The quad-camera setup protrudes another 2 millimeters from the case, which makes the Xiaomi wobble quite a bit when it's placed on a table. Once you put it in the included protective case, however, this is almost no longer noticeable.

The Poco X3 Pro scores points with high stability and tight gap dimensions. In addition, it has an IP53 certification. Although this doesn't make it waterproof, it does make it resistant to splashing water, which is why raindrops, for example, can't harm it.

The display of the Poco X3 Pro is protected by Gorilla Glass 6. As a result, the smartphone is supposed to survive a drop from up to 1.6 meters onto hard, rough surfaces - we didn't give this a try, though. The back is made of plastic and has a matte finish towards the edges.

An eye-catching detail is the glossy stripe that runs through the center of the back cover from top to bottom. It's wide enough to enclose the large camera module, and it also carries the Poco logo, which slightly reflects incoming light according to the viewing angle. The feel also fits the "dual" look. The strip in the center provides an even slightly better grip for the fingers than the sides, making the smartphone sit pretty securely in the hand despite its size.

Xiaomi offers the Poco X3 Pro in blue, metal bronze, and black.

, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Size comparison

166.1 mm / 6.54 inch 76.1 mm / 3 inch 9.9 mm / 0.3898 inch 212 g0.4674 lbs165.3 mm / 6.51 inch 76.8 mm / 3.02 inch 9.4 mm / 0.3701 inch 215 g0.474 lbs164 mm / 6.46 inch 76.5 mm / 3.01 inch 8.1 mm / 0.3189 inch 193 g0.4255 lbs162 mm / 6.38 inch 75 mm / 2.95 inch 7.9 mm / 0.311 inch 177 g0.3902 lbs161 mm / 6.34 inch 74 mm / 2.91 inch 8 mm / 0.315 inch 176 g0.388 lbs159.9 mm / 6.3 inch 75.1 mm / 2.96 inch 8.4 mm / 0.3307 inch 189 g0.4167 lbs

Connectivity - At least 6 GB of RAM and 128 GB of UFS 3.1 storage in the Poco X3 Pro

The internal storage that varies between 128 and 256 GB depending on the model can be expanded via a microSD card. It can be up to 1 TB in size, but it can't store apps, only media data. Another limitation: There is no real dual SIM. The card slot can hold either two SIM cards or one SIM card and one microSD card.

The Poco X3 Pro has an OTG-compatible USB-C port with USB 2.0 speeds. In addition, there's an IR blaster, a 3.5 mm audio jack, FM radio, a notification LED, as well as Bluetooth 5.0 and NFC, which makes the configuration quite extensive. Since DRM Widevine L1 is also on board, the Xiaomi phone can also reproduce streaming content, such as from Netflix, in HD quality.

Left: SIM/microSD slot
Left: SIM/microSD slot
Right: Volume rocker, power button with fingerprint sensor
Right: Volume rocker, power button with fingerprint sensor
Top: IR blaster, microphone
Top: IR blaster, microphone
Bottom: Speaker, microphone, USB-C, 3.5 mm audio jack
Bottom: Speaker, microphone, USB-C, 3.5 mm audio jack

microSD card reader

The Xiaomi transfers data from microSD cards at a good speed - the sequential read and write rates that we measured can't even be surpassed by high-end smartphones. The copy speed, on the other hand, is quite weak.

SDCardreader Transfer Speed - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
15.75 MB/s ∼100%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

05101520253035404550556065707580859047.951.549.452.752.852.250.645.944.341.539.542.84843.139.242.839.941.538.238.736.435.144.739.634.939.736.546.243.537.144.740.442.539.344.143.545.932.838.44042.540.437.947.346.840.134.644.450.442.343.6434549.641.845.437.738.847.542.546.242.144.844.744.542.541.144.342.339.946.841.743.142.745.441.836.638.64245.346.841.246.43942.437.945.243.940.745.748.142.640.63542.540.246.644.946.640.641.743.940.537.246.242.14436.239.138.640.542.138.539.641.743.8414144.944.645.338.739.540.842.743.642.344.147.951.549.452.752.852.250.645.944.341.539.542.84843.139.242.839.941.538.238.736.435.144.739.634.939.736.546.243.537.144.740.442.539.344.143.545.932.838.44042.540.437.947.346.840.134.644.450.442.343.6434549.641.845.437.738.847.542.546.242.144.844.744.542.541.144.342.339.946.841.743.142.745.441.836.638.64245.346.841.246.43942.437.945.243.940.745.748.142.640.63542.540.246.644.946.640.641.743.940.537.246.242.14436.239.138.640.542.138.539.641.743.8414144.944.645.338.739.540.842.743.642.344.141.887.887.885.580.584.688.565.688.588.986.888.187.185.985.481.479.880.787.788.488.28587.985.588.988.18880.578.583.178.573.587.687.383.688.187.186.686.788.987.884.587.488.787.887.686.380.182.788.486.486.987.884.981.186.482.679.987.585.38586.485.787.689.786.187.184.387.886.687.783.379.888.786.184.390.781.883.886.987.686.186.786.488.288.585.987.385.487.688.783.882.886.886.485.887.686.584.384.988.186.187.28687.486.283.885.783.785.383.887.284.685.587.388.48587.288.384.187.883.387.388.885.28679.894Tooltip
; Sequential write: Ø42.6 (32.8-52.8)
; Sequential read: Ø85.3 (41.8-94)

Software - Android 11 und MIUI 12

Xiaomi equips the Poco X3 Pro with Android 11 and its in-house user interface MIUI 12. The Android security patches were at the level of April 2021 at the time of testing (end of May) and consequently still pretty up to date.

The OS and preinstalled apps use 20.6 GB of the 128 GB of storage, so there's still about 107 GB free. The additional third-party software is limited to a handful of apps like Facebook, Netflix, ebay, and Amazon, which can all be uninstalled.

Communication and GNSS - Good GPS, 4G, and Wi-Fi 5

The Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro isn't equipped with 5G, but it offers a solid 4G frequency coverage that should be sufficient to use the device in Germany. Wireless connections are stable and reliable in the test.

In terms of WLAN, the Xiaomi phone uses Wi-Fi 5 and 2x2 MIMO antenna technology. The smartphone achieves both stable and quite fast transmission rates of over 600 Mb/s for sending data in the test. However, there's still some room for improvement in terms of receiving data: The Motorola Moto G 5G shows that more than 600 Mb/s can definitely be reached despite only using Wi-Fi 5.

Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Motorola Moto G 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
665 (603min - 673max) MBit/s ∼100% +2%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
652 (326min - 669max) MBit/s ∼98%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.59 - 1599, n=303, last 2 years)
415 MBit/s ∼62% -36%
Oppo A73 5G
Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 720, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
341 (323min - 361max) MBit/s ∼51% -48%
realme 8 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 720G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
323 (279min - 332max) MBit/s ∼49% -50%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
283 (148min - 297max) MBit/s ∼43% -57%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Adreno 618, SD 720G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
282 (141min - 293max) MBit/s ∼42% -57%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Motorola Moto G 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
628 (481min - 662max) MBit/s ∼100% +29%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
486 (425min - 550max) MBit/s ∼77%
Average of class Smartphone
  (15.5 - 1414, n=303, last 2 years)
419 MBit/s ∼67% -14%
Oppo A73 5G
Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 720, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
340 (313min - 353max) MBit/s ∼54% -30%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
331 (158min - 339max) MBit/s ∼53% -32%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Adreno 618, SD 720G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
310 (271min - 334max) MBit/s ∼49% -36%
realme 8 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 720G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
304 (218min - 328max) MBit/s ∼48% -37%
03570105140175210245280315350385420455490525560595630665441430467466487506511477495468479472465506510507481538550480425475521493527442458525481471441430467466487506511477495468479472465506510507481538550480425475521493527442458525481471326655652667654645638646643645639643653657645656655649658657655649669655650662658652656647Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø485 (425-550)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø641 (326-669)
GPS reception indoors
GPS reception indoors
GPS reception outdoors
GPS reception outdoors

The Xiaomi phone obtains its location information via the GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, and Galileo satellite navigation systems, and it can determine our position both indoors and outdoors quite quickly and with an accuracy of 3 meters.

Accuracy remains high when moving as well. On a 10-kilometer bike ride, the Poco X3 Pro is not quite as accurate as the Garmin Edge 500 professional navigation device, and it's frequently a bit off when it comes to dense urban areas in particular, but overall, deviations from the route are hardly worth mentioning.

GPS Test: Summary
GPS Test: Summary
GPS Test: Lake
GPS Test: Lake
GPS Test: Turning point
GPS Test: Turning point

Telephone and call quality

The Poco X3 Pro convinces with good call quality. It transmits voices very naturally and also reproduces them relatively clearly in speakerphone mode, but they sound a bit more muffled in that case. Noise cancellation is also good and works well even in noisy environments.

The Xiaomi smartphone supports VoLTE and Wi-Fi calls but not eSIMs.

Cameras - Quad-camera setup with 48 MP and pixel-binning

Photo taken with the main camera
Photo taken with the main camera

The Poco X3 Pro has an ensemble of four lenses and an LED flash on its back panel. Its core is a 48 MP camera that shoots 12 MP photos using 4-in-1 pixel-binning, but it optionally also uses the full 48 MP resolution.

The main camera takes good pictures in daylight that score points with natural colors and decent image sharpness. Pixel-binning and Night Mode, which can be turned on and off, are intended to improve the light yield in the dark. As the low-light test scene shows, the Xiaomi phone does indeed manage this quite well, but the camera can no longer extract that much image detail in that case.

The additional 119° wide-angle lens with an 8 MP resolution does its job as well as the main camera in terms of colors and contrast. However, pictures taken with the wide-angle camera visibly lack sharpness at the edges of the image. The lens quartet is topped off by a depth-of-field camera with 2 MP and a macro camera that is activated in the camera settings and then has a fixed focus of 4 cm. However, because it also only has a resolution of 2 MP, its use is quite limited.

The main camera records videos at up to 4K and 30 frames per second, and it's supported by electronic image stabilization. The Dual Mode is a nice extra, where the front and rear cameras record simultaneously, and both views are combined into one video.

The 20 MP selfie camera records videos at 720p or 1080p and 30 frames per second. Its image quality is okay for video calls, but it's obviously not a photo pro. Good pictures are possible in daylight, but image sharpness is poor when there's backlight, and it's quickly overtaxed in the dark due to the lack of pixel-binning.

Photo taken with the selfie camera
Photo taken with the selfie camera
Photo taken with the main camera
Photo taken with the main camera
Photo taken with the main camera
Photo taken with the main camera

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Daylight scene 1Daylight scene 2Ultra wide-angle5x zoomLow-light photo

Under controlled lighting conditions, the camera renders the test chart sharply and provides a fairly accurate color reproduction. Both are poor in low ambient light, but the test chart is still quite easy to recognize.

ColorChecker
11.1 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
6 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
1.9 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro: 8.22 ∆E min: 1.91 - max: 16.7 ∆E
ColorChecker
28.7 ∆E
42.8 ∆E
31.2 ∆E
30.7 ∆E
34.7 ∆E
51.1 ∆E
42 ∆E
24.3 ∆E
29.1 ∆E
21.7 ∆E
50.5 ∆E
52 ∆E
19.9 ∆E
36 ∆E
23.8 ∆E
48.4 ∆E
31 ∆E
37.1 ∆E
46.8 ∆E
45.8 ∆E
40.7 ∆E
34 ∆E
23.4 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro: 34.97 ∆E min: 13.55 - max: 51.98 ∆E

Accessories and warranty - 33-watt power adapter included

Xiaomi includes a 33-watt fast charger, a USB-C cable (Type-A to C), a SIM eject tool, a protective case, a user manual, and a warranty card with the Poco X3 Pro. The manufacturer doesn't offer any special accessories for the smartphone.

The Poco X3 Pro comes with a 12-month warranty from the manufacturer. This doesn't affect the legal retailer warranty.

Input devices and handling - 240 Hz touch sampling rate, very fast fingerprint scanner

The Xiaomi smartphone was practically born with the ability to provide fast operation: The IPS touchscreen responds quickly and precisely to inputs with its 240 Hz touch sampling rate. In addition, the refresh rate can be set to 60 or 120 Hz, making operation even smoother in the 120 Hz setting.

The fingerprint sensor integrated into the power button works very quickly - it unlocks the smartphone immediately after you put your finger on it. A further biometric login method is facial scan. The unlocking speed is high here as well, but the detection rate is only good when either the ambient light or the display are bright enough.

Keyboard in portrait mode
Keyboard in portrait mode
Keyboard in landscape mode
Keyboard in landscape mode

Display - Birght IPS panel with 120 Hz refresh rate

Subpixel grid
Subpixel grid

The Poco X3 Pro has an IPS display with a resolution of 2400x1080 pixels, a diagonal size of 6.67 inches, a refresh rate of 120 Hz, and a touch sampling rate of 240 Hz - these are the same specs as in the Poco X3 NFC. Xiaomi itself proves that it's definitely possible to use an OLED panel instead of an IPS one in this price range with the 6.67-inch Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, for example, which is available for under 300 Euros (~$366).

With an average of 524.1 cd/m², the Poco X3 Pro has almost the same brightness as the Poco X3 NFC (600.2 cd/m²), and it's also practically on par with its sibling model in terms of contrast ratio with a good 995:1. We can get a maximum brightness of 556 cd/m² from the smartphone in the APL50 measurement, while the maximum value is still 479 cd/m² when the brightness sensor is turned off. In the lowest brightness setting, the luminosity is 1.15 cd/m².

The IPS panel adjusts its brightness using pulse width modulation (PWM). However, it operates in such a high-frequency range at 2,404 Hz that the resulting PWM flickering shouldn't be bothersome for the vast majority of users.

514
cd/m²
541
cd/m²
529
cd/m²
496
cd/m²
567
cd/m²
534
cd/m²
494
cd/m²
514
cd/m²
528
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 567 cd/m² Average: 524.1 cd/m² Minimum: 1.15 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 567 cd/m²
Contrast: 995:1 (Black: 0.57 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.6
ΔE Greyscale 1.7 | 0.64-98 Ø5.8
95.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.16
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.67
Motorola Moto G 5G
LTPS LCD, 2400x1080, 6.70
Oppo A73 5G
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.50
realme 8 Pro
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.40
Samsung Galaxy A52
Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.50
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.67
Screen
-30%
-64%
-126%
-42%
-2%
Brightness middle
567
586
3%
527
-7%
581
2%
694
22%
653
15%
Brightness
524
565
8%
499
-5%
563
7%
696
33%
651
24%
Brightness Distribution
87
88
1%
87
0%
86
-1%
98
13%
98
13%
Black Level *
0.57
0.61
-7%
0.38
33%
Contrast
995
961
-3%
1387
39%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1
1.74
-74%
3.5
-250%
4.34
-334%
2
-100%
1.2
-20%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
2.1
4.09
-95%
7.3
-248%
7.15
-240%
6.7
-219%
2.9
-38%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.7
3
-76%
2.9
-71%
4.9
-188%
1.7
-0%
1.8
-6%
Gamma
2.16 102%
2.244 98%
2.29 96%
2.327 95%
2.1 105%
2.25 98%
CCT
6343 102%
6000 108%
6502 100%
7658 85%
6440 101%
6426 101%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 2404 Hz ≤ 38 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 2404 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 38 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 2404 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 14793 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

In the "Automatic" preset color scheme, the display adjusts its colors to the ambient light. The other color schemes are "Saturated" and "Standard", which also offers the best image quality. The deviations in colors and grayscales are minimal in the "Standard" color scheme, and the color temperature is very good.

Color accuracy (Standard color scheme, sRGB target color space)
Color accuracy (Standard color scheme, sRGB target color space)
Color space (Standard color scheme, sRGB target color space)
Color space (Standard color scheme, sRGB target color space)
Grayscales (Standard color scheme, sRGB target color space)
Grayscales (Standard color scheme, sRGB target color space)
Saturation (Standard color scheme, sRGB target color space)
Saturation (Standard color scheme, sRGB target color space)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9.2 ms rise
↘ 14.8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 38 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (24 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
50.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 23.2 ms rise
↘ 27.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 83 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (38.1 ms).

The Poco X3 Pro scores points with high viewing-angle stability, and it also performs well outdoors. However, due to the smartphone's brightness potential that isn't exactly ample, it's best to use it in places in the shade. Content remains visible in direct sunlight, but it's difficult to read.

Outdoor use (shade)
Outdoor use (shade)
Outdoor use (sunlight)
Outdoor use (sunlight)
Viewing angles
Viewing angles

Performance - A refreshed Snapdragon 855+

The Poco X3 Pro is the first smartphone to use the Snapdragon 860. However, the mid-range SoC isn't exactly new, but it's an almost unchanged update to the Snapdragon 855+ that was launched in mid-2019. Therefore, the Snapdragon 860 also makes use of 4 Cortex-A76 cores with at up to 2.96 GHz and 4 power-saving Cortex-A55 cores with clock rates of up to 1.8 GHz. The SoC is supported by the Adreno 640 graphics chip and up to 8 GB of LPDDR4x RAM.

Although the Snapdragon 860 is based on technology that is almost two years old, which is almost as old as the Bible by smartphone standards, it performs very well in the benchmarks. The Poco X3 Pro is currently one of the fastest mid-range smartphones and can clearly beat the Poco X3 NFC that is equipped with the Snapdragon 732G. Overall, the Poco X3 Pro even comes quite close to the Poco F3, which is powered by the Snapdragon 870.

Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
728 Points ∼100%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
657 Points ∼90% -10%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
516 Points ∼71% -29%
realme 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
570 Points ∼78% -22%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
545 Points ∼75% -25%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
563 Points ∼77% -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
 
728 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1604, n=235, last 2 years)
565 Points ∼78% -22%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
2657 Points ∼100%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1987 Points ∼75% -25%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
1638 Points ∼62% -38%
realme 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
1694 Points ∼64% -36%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
1622 Points ∼61% -39%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
1728 Points ∼65% -35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
 
2657 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4455, n=235, last 2 years)
1939 Points ∼73% -27%
Vulkan Score 5.3 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
2324 Points ∼100%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1143 Points ∼49% -51%
realme 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
1198 Points ∼52% -48%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
1176 Points ∼51% -49%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
1182 Points ∼51% -49%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
 
2324 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (72 - 6524, n=125, last 2 years)
2045 Points ∼88% -12%
OpenCL Score 5.3 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
2668 Points ∼100%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1245 Points ∼47% -53%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
1537 Points ∼58% -42%
realme 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
1237 Points ∼46% -54%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
1226 Points ∼46% -54%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
1293 Points ∼48% -52%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
 
2668 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (255 - 7514, n=129, last 2 years)
2133 Points ∼80% -20%
PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
9794 Points ∼92%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
10673 Points ∼100%
realme 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
9668 Points ∼91%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
9898 Points ∼93%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
8543 Points ∼80%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2689 - 19989, n=223, last 2 years)
9982 Points ∼94%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
11699 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
11699 Points ∼100% 0%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
8076 Points ∼69% -31%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
7395 Points ∼63% -37%
realme 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
8463 Points ∼72% -28%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
8411 Points ∼72% -28%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
8688 Points ∼74% -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
  (11699 - 11699, n=2)
11699 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 15299, n=267, last 2 years)
7878 Points ∼67% -33%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
39807 Points ∼99%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
23548 Points ∼59%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
40241 Points ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2920 - 117606, n=207, last 2 years)
40247 Points ∼100%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
54788 Points ∼94%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
29682 Points ∼51%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
49743 Points ∼86%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2177 - 224130, n=207, last 2 years)
58049 Points ∼100%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
20351 Points ∼84%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
13664 Points ∼57%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
24117 Points ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8324 - 59268, n=207, last 2 years)
23323 Points ∼97%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
Points ∼0%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3998 Points ∼99%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3521 Points ∼88%
realme 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3678 Points ∼91%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3683 Points ∼92%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
4021 Points ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 11256, n=261, last 2 years)
3370 Points ∼84%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
Points ∼0%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
4097 Points ∼97%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3694 Points ∼87%
realme 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3839 Points ∼91%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3853 Points ∼91%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
4232 Points ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (54 - 16670, n=261, last 2 years)
3942 Points ∼93%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
Points ∼0%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3657 Points ∼100%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3024 Points ∼83%
realme 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3208 Points ∼88%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3190 Points ∼87%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3375 Points ∼92%
Average of class Smartphone
  (607 - 5301, n=261, last 2 years)
2757 Points ∼75%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
7752 Points ∼100%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
4098 Points ∼53% -47%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3377 Points ∼44% -56%
realme 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3782 Points ∼49% -51%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3783 Points ∼49% -51%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3887 Points ∼50% -50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
 
7752 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (149 - 11895, n=277, last 2 years)
3947 Points ∼51% -49%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
12070 Points ∼100%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
4211 Points ∼35% -65%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3497 Points ∼29% -71%
realme 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
4008 Points ∼33% -67%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
4005 Points ∼33% -67%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
4038 Points ∼33% -67%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
 
12070 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 22052, n=277, last 2 years)
4982 Points ∼41% -59%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
3442 Points ∼100%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3014 Points ∼88% -12%
realme 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3160 Points ∼92% -8%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3167 Points ∼92% -8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3372 Points ∼98% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
 
3442 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (620 - 5784, n=275, last 2 years)
2908 Points ∼84% -16%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
Points ∼0%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2798 Points ∼100%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2529 Points ∼90%
realme 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2590 Points ∼93%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2577 Points ∼92%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2783 Points ∼99%
Average of class Smartphone
  (78 - 9138, n=259, last 2 years)
2628 Points ∼94%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
Points ∼0%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2549 Points ∼92%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2418 Points ∼87%
realme 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2462 Points ∼88%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2450 Points ∼88%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2694 Points ∼97%
Average of class Smartphone
  (62 - 11573, n=259, last 2 years)
2784 Points ∼100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
Points ∼0%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3566 Points ∼100%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3011 Points ∼84%
realme 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3168 Points ∼89%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3149 Points ∼88%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3372 Points ∼95%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5318, n=259, last 2 years)
2803 Points ∼79%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
6871 Points ∼100%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2956 Points ∼43% -57%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2653 Points ∼39% -61%
realme 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2743 Points ∼40% -60%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2727 Points ∼40% -60%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2938 Points ∼43% -57%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
 
6871 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (91 - 9839, n=275, last 2 years)
3191 Points ∼46% -54%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
8218 Points ∼100%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2762 Points ∼34% -66%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2561 Points ∼31% -69%
realme 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2642 Points ∼32% -68%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2620 Points ∼32% -68%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2832 Points ∼34% -66%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
 
8218 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (73 - 12914, n=275, last 2 years)
3565 Points ∼43% -57%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
4367 Points ∼100%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3659 Points ∼84% -16%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3037 Points ∼70% -30%
realme 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3164 Points ∼72% -28%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3184 Points ∼73% -27%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3311 Points ∼76% -24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
 
4367 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (620 - 5793, n=275, last 2 years)
2959 Points ∼68% -32%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
5406 Points ∼100%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2601 Points ∼48% -52%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2410 Points ∼45% -55%
realme 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2454 Points ∼45% -55%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2437 Points ∼45% -55%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2610 Points ∼48% -52%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
 
5406 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (426 - 6977, n=216, last 2 years)
2634 Points ∼49% -51%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
6987 Points ∼100%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2479 Points ∼35% -65%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2354 Points ∼34% -66%
realme 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2382 Points ∼34% -66%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2373 Points ∼34% -66%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2562 Points ∼37% -63%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
 
6987 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (349 - 11259, n=216, last 2 years)
2956 Points ∼42% -58%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
3017 Points ∼100%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2876 Points ∼95% -5%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2631 Points ∼87% -13%
realme 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2747 Points ∼91% -9%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2693 Points ∼89% -11%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2773 Points ∼92% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
 
3017 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1786 - 4061, n=216, last 2 years)
2651 Points ∼88% -12%
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
3488 Points ∼95%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3658 Points ∼100% +5%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
1233 Points ∼34% -65%
realme 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
1052 Points ∼29% -70%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
1052 Points ∼29% -70%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
1143 Points ∼31% -67%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
 
3488 Points ∼95% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (153 - 7275, n=91, last 2 years)
2735 Points ∼75% -22%
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
3455 Points ∼100%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1098 Points ∼32% -68%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
1207 Points ∼35% -65%
realme 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
1052 Points ∼30% -70%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
1044 Points ∼30% -70%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
1124 Points ∼33% -67%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
 
3455 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (205 - 8672, n=88, last 2 years)
2941 Points ∼85% -15%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
119 fps ∼100%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
60 fps ∼50% -50%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
55 fps ∼46% -54%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
70 fps ∼59% -41%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
81 fps ∼68% -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
 
119 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8.2 - 143, n=216, last 2 years)
57 fps ∼48% -52%
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
184 fps ∼100%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
90 fps ∼49% -51%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
67 fps ∼36% -64%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
77 fps ∼42% -58%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
91 fps ∼49% -51%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
 
184 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.3 - 322, n=216, last 2 years)
106 fps ∼58% -42%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
103 fps ∼100%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
40 fps ∼39% -61%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
37 fps ∼36% -64%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
37 fps ∼36% -64%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
40 fps ∼39% -61%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
 
103 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.5 - 120, n=214, last 2 years)
44.9 fps ∼44% -56%
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
110 fps ∼100%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
45 fps ∼41% -59%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
37 fps ∼34% -66%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
39 fps ∼35% -65%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
45 fps ∼41% -59%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
 
110 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 180, n=215, last 2 years)
61.9 fps ∼56% -44%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
74 fps ∼100%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
29 fps ∼39% -61%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
24 fps ∼32% -68%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
27 fps ∼36% -64%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
29 fps ∼39% -61%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
 
74 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.1 - 106, n=213, last 2 years)
35.4 fps ∼48% -52%
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
77 fps ∼100%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
33 fps ∼43% -57%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
27 fps ∼35% -65%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
31 fps ∼40% -60%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
33 fps ∼43% -57%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
 
77 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 121, n=213, last 2 years)
42.4 fps ∼55% -45%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
44 fps ∼100%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
16 fps ∼36% -64%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
13 fps ∼30% -70%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
15 fps ∼34% -66%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps ∼39% -61%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
 
44 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 61, n=212, last 2 years)
22.1 fps ∼50% -50%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
46 fps ∼100%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
18 fps ∼39% -61%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
15 fps ∼33% -67%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
17 fps ∼37% -63%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
19 fps ∼41% -59%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
 
46 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 75, n=212, last 2 years)
25.4 fps ∼55% -45%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
45 fps ∼100%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
17 fps ∼38% -62%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
15 fps ∼33% -67%
realme 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
17 fps ∼38% -62%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
17 fps ∼38% -62%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
18 fps ∼40% -60%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
 
45 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 73, n=281, last 2 years)
22.2 fps ∼49% -51%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
46 fps ∼100%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
19 fps ∼41% -59%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
17 fps ∼37% -63%
realme 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
19 fps ∼41% -59%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
19 fps ∼41% -59%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
21 fps ∼46% -54%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
 
46 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.95 - 257, n=280, last 2 years)
25.5 fps ∼55% -45%
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
29 fps ∼100%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
11 fps ∼38% -62%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
9.2 fps ∼32% -68%
realme 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
11 fps ∼38% -62%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
11 fps ∼38% -62%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
11 fps ∼38% -62%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
 
29 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 60, n=281, last 2 years)
14.7 fps ∼51% -49%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
17 fps ∼100%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
7.5 fps ∼44% -56%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
6.1 fps ∼36% -64%
realme 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
7 fps ∼41% -59%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
7.1 fps ∼42% -58%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
7.4 fps ∼44% -56%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
 
17 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.35 - 101, n=280, last 2 years)
10.1 fps ∼59% -41%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
483527 Points ∼100%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
291387 Points ∼60% -40%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
253013 Points ∼52% -48%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
288306 Points ∼60% -40%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
292450 Points ∼60% -40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
 
483527 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 727247, n=187, last 2 years)
331119 Points ∼68% -32%
VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
6950 Score ∼100%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2506 Score ∼36% -64%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2538 Score ∼37% -63%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
 
6950 Score ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (421 - 7649, n=57, last 2 years)
3256 Score ∼47% -53%
AImark - Score v2.x (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
46152 Points ∼79%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
13120 Points ∼23% -72%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
21348 Points ∼37% -54%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
4958 Points ∼9% -89%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
 
46152 Points ∼79% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4293 - 264766, n=65, last 2 years)
58160 Points ∼100% +26%
Basemark GPU 1.2
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
67.6 fps ∼85%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
23.47 fps ∼29% -65%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
28.82 (1629min - 40.39max) fps ∼36% -57%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
 
67.6 fps ∼85% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.7 - 1902, n=43, last 2 years)
79.9 fps ∼100% +18%
OpenGL Medium Native (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
59.89 fps ∼83%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
20.93 fps ∼29% -65%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
28.12 (16.2min - 63.34max) fps ∼39% -53%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
 
59.9 fps ∼83% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5 - 1736, n=42, last 2 years)
71.8 fps ∼100% +20%
1280x720 Vulkan Simple Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
448.9 fps ∼100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
232.33 (92.39min - 1023.24max) fps ∼52% -48%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
 
449 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (29.8 - 2982, n=38, last 2 years)
296 fps ∼66% -34%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
64.92 fps ∼80%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
44.63 fps ∼55% -31%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
28.78 (16.88min - 48.34max) fps ∼36% -56%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
 
64.9 fps ∼80% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8.79 - 1962, n=42, last 2 years)
80.9 fps ∼100% +25%
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
57.37 fps ∼82%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
18.02 fps ∼26% -69%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
25.21 (14.33min - 52.34max) fps ∼36% -56%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
 
57.4 fps ∼82% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10.5 - 1746, n=42, last 2 years)
70.3 fps ∼100% +23%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
5224 Points ∼100%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3654 Points ∼70% -30%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3019 Points ∼58% -42%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3287 Points ∼63% -37%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3365 Points ∼64% -36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
 
5224 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (323 - 6959, n=199, last 2 years)
3623 Points ∼69% -31%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
8549 Points ∼100%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
7064 Points ∼83% -17%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
5692 Points ∼67% -33%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
5783 Points ∼68% -32%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
5972 Points ∼70% -30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
 
8549 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1160 - 14189, n=199, last 2 years)
6633 Points ∼78% -22%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
5716 Points ∼100%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
4769 Points ∼83% -17%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
4185 Points ∼73% -27%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3845 Points ∼67% -33%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
4043 Points ∼71% -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
 
5716 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (522 - 9044, n=199, last 2 years)
4238 Points ∼74% -26%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
10549 Points ∼100%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3987 Points ∼38% -62%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2687 Points ∼25% -75%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3830 Points ∼36% -64%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
4086 Points ∼39% -61%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
 
10549 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (349 - 16996, n=199, last 2 years)
5605 Points ∼53% -47%
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
1445 Points ∼100%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1233 Points ∼85% -15%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
1297 Points ∼90% -10%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
1371 Points ∼95% -5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
1228 Points ∼85% -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
 
1445 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2169, n=199, last 2 years)
1272 Points ∼88% -12%

The Poco X3 Pro delivers the same impressive performance in the browser benchmarks. It doesn't give the assembled mid-range competitors a chance and takes the top spot in all benchmarks.

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro (Chrome 90.0.4430.210)
62.028 Points ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
62 Points ∼100% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A52 (Chrome 90)
54.419 Points ∼88% -12%
Motorola Moto G 5G (Chrome88)
52.751 Points ∼85% -15%
Average of class Smartphone (12.4 - 161, n=185, last 2 years)
50 Points ∼81% -19%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (Chrome98)
49.472 Points ∼80% -20%
Oppo A73 5G (Chrome 83)
34.002 Points ∼55% -45%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro (Chrome 90.0.4430.210)
110.16 Points ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
110 Points ∼100% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A52 (Chrome 90)
94.658 Points ∼86% -14%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (Chrome98)
89.832 Points ∼82% -18%
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 375, n=193, last 2 years)
89.7 Points ∼81% -19%
Oppo A73 5G (Chrome 83)
70.069 Points ∼64% -36%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro (Chrome 90.0.4430.210)
59 runs/min ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
59 runs/min ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (9 - 196, n=166, last 2 years)
50.7 runs/min ∼86% -14%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (Chrome98)
43.2 runs/min ∼73% -27%
Samsung Galaxy A52 (Chrome 90)
37.9 runs/min ∼64% -36%
Oppo A73 5G (Chrome 83)
37.7 runs/min ∼64% -36%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro (Chrome 90.0.4430.210)
90 Points ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
90 Points ∼100% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A52 (Chrome 90)
78 Points ∼87% -13%
Average of class Smartphone (20 - 194, n=203, last 2 years)
77.9 Points ∼87% -13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (Chrome98)
71 Points ∼79% -21%
Oppo A73 5G (Chrome 83)
49 Points ∼54% -46%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro (Chrome 90.0.4430.210)
23902 Points ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
23902 Points ∼100% 0%
Motorola Moto G 5G (Chrome88)
17786 Points ∼74% -26%
Samsung Galaxy A52 (Chrome 90)
17734 Points ∼74% -26%
Average of class Smartphone (1986 - 58632, n=210, last 2 years)
17317 Points ∼72% -28%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (Chrome98)
17293 Points ∼72% -28%
Oppo A73 5G (Chrome 83)
14886 Points ∼62% -38%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Oppo A73 5G (Chrome 83)
4059.1 ms * ∼100% -88%
Average of class Smartphone (460 - 29635, n=212, last 2 years)
3993 ms * ∼98% -85%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (Chrome98)
2832.3 ms * ∼70% -31%
Samsung Galaxy A52 (Chrome 90)
2532.1 ms * ∼62% -18%
Motorola Moto G 5G (Chrome88)
2467.7 ms * ∼61% -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
2155 ms * ∼53% -0%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro (Chrome 90.0.4430.210)
2154.8 ms * ∼53%

* ... smaller is better

Depending on the version, the Poco X3 Pro comes with 128 or 256 GB of UFS 3.1 storage, with which the Xiaomi phone provides great performance. However, the data transfer rates are a bit below average for UFS 3.1 flash memory, but this isn't noticeable when using the smartphone.

Xiaomi Poco X3 ProMotorola Moto G 5GOppo A73 5Grealme 8 ProSamsung Galaxy A52Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 ProAverage 128 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-30%
-50%
-58%
-43%
-42%
28%
-37%
Sequential Read 256KB
1330.34
821.9
-38%
859.98
-35%
474
-64%
511.13
-62%
511.55
-62%
1566 (1330 - 1730, n=18)
18%
750 (41.9 - 2037, n=287, last 2 years)
-44%
Sequential Write 256KB
527.22
243
-54%
193.04
-63%
191.7
-64%
267.14
-49%
267.99
-49%
754 (527 - 1095, n=18)
43%
327 (11.9 - 1321, n=287, last 2 years)
-38%
Random Read 4KB
203.15
157.8
-22%
102.16
-50%
98.5
-52%
135.54
-33%
146.52
-28%
236 (133 - 317, n=18)
16%
134 (13.5 - 325, n=287, last 2 years)
-34%
Random Write 4KB
176.9
167.8
-5%
88.11
-50%
84.8
-52%
127.27
-28%
126.65
-28%
235 (121 - 306, n=18)
33%
120 (4.97 - 330, n=287, last 2 years)
-32%

Games - Strong hardware with FPS brake

The Poco X3 Pro's graphics unit is the Adreno 640, which makes it easy for the smartphone to render modern games smoothly. The test games Armajet, Asphalt 9: Legends, and PUBG Mobile were all played at maximum frame rates or as fast as the game allowed. But why is there such a limitation? The Xiaomi phone should actually be able to fully utilize its 120 Hz display in Armajet, because the game supports the corresponding frame rates, but it sets the limit at 30 FPS.

We determine the frame rates with Gamebench.

Armajet
Armajet
Asphalt 9
Asphalt 9
PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
051015202530354045505560293029303030303030303029303030303029312930282930303030303030303029303030303030303030293030283030303030303030303030303030293030303030303029312931293030303030302931293129303030303030303030293029303030303029292527283030303029303030303030303030303029303029303030303030303030293030302929303029302930303030303030302930303030302931293028293030303030303030302930303030303030303029303028303030303030303030303030303029303030303030302931293129303030303030293129312930303030303030303029302930303030302929252728303030302930303030303030303030302930302930303030303030303029303030292930305753585160566060595153606060605960516060605960606060596059606060606058596057605957595860596060605960606059606059576059594458606057606060606060566060585754606060606056575753606060596060606060605960576060606059605751575754606060606058596060606060535960606060605560606060606059606060606058602930293030303030303030293030303030293129302829303030303030303030293030303030303030302930302830303030303030303030303030302930303030303030293129312930303030303029312931293030303030303030302930293030303030292925272830303030293030303030303030303030293030293030303030303030302930303029293030575358516056606059515360606060596051606060596060606059605960606060605859605760595759586059606060596060605960605957605959445860605760606060606056606058575460606060605657575360606059606060606060596057606060605960575157575460606060605859606060606053596060606060556060606060605960606060605860303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030302931303030303030303029303130302930303031303029303030313030293030313030293030303031302930303030303129303030303030303030303030303030302931303030303030303030303029313030303030303030303030303030303030302931303030303029313030