Ryzen 5 2600X and Ryzen 7 2700X in review
Are you a techie who knows how to write? Then join our Team! Wanted:
- News translator (DE-EN)
- Review translation proofreader (DE-EN)
Details here
For AMD, last year was all about its successful and surprisingly fast Ryzen CPUs. Their new Zen microarchitecture succeeded the older 32 and 24 nm architectures, and AMD has managed to improve the manufacturing process once more and refers to the new 12 nm process as Zen+ architecture. Compared to the older 14 nm process AMD claims up to 16% more performance at identical levels of power consumption.
This would in theory allow for a higher base clock frequency as well as higher turbo boost frequencies (Precision Boost 2) which would also no longer be limited to just two cores. In addition, AMD claims to have lowered cache latencies, which should in theory result in higher IPC (instructions per cycle).
AMD’s new top model is the Ryzen 7 2700X. Compared to the Ryzen 7 1800X the newcomer has a 15 W higher TDP (now 105 W), which should allow for a more consistent turbo boost frequency. Its smaller sibling, the Ryzen 5 2600X, profits from the exact same architectural improvements and features a higher base frequency as well as improved turbo boost capabilities. However, this hexa-core CPU comes with the same 95 W TDP as its Ryzen 5 1600X predecessor. Both new CPUs feature SMT/Hyper-Threading, which means that they can work on 12 and 16 threads simultaneously, respectively.
Compared to last year’s launch prices the Ryzen 2000 series’ price has dropped quite significantly. Most importantly, this puts a lot of pressure on Intel given that with its price tag of $350 the Core i7-8700K offers just six instead of eight cores.
The included Pinnacle Ridge generation stock coolers have also been upgraded. The top model Ryzen 7 2700X now includes a Wraith Prism LED cooler with RGB lighting while the Ryzen 7 2700 has to make do with a Write Spire with unicolor lighting and the Ryzen 5 models don’t have any LEDs on their Wraith Spire coolers at all.
Model | Cores - Threads | Base Frequency | Turbo Frequency | XFR-Overclock | L3-Cache | TDP | Launch Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ryzen R7 2700X | 8-16 | 3.7 GHz | 4.3 GHz | up to 7 % | 16 MB | 105 Watts | $329 |
Ryzen R7 2700 | 8-16 | 3.2 GHz | 4.1 GHz | - | 16 MB | 65 Watts | $299 |
Ryzen R5 2600X | 6-12 | 3.6 GHz | 4.2 GHz | up to 7 % | 16 MB | 95 Watts | $229 |
Ryzen R5 2600 | 6-12 | 3.4 GHz | 3.9 GHz | - | 16 MB | 65 Watts | $199 |
Ryzen R7 1800X | 8-16 | 3.6 GHz | 3.7 GHz | 100 MHz | 16 MB | 95 Watts | $559 |
Ryzen R7 1700X | 8-16 | 3.4 GHz | 3.5 GHz | 100 MHz | 16 MB | 95 Watts | $439 |
Ryzen R5 1600X | 6-12 | 3.6 GHz | 4.0 GHz | 100 MHz | 16 MB | 65 Watts | $280 |
We have chosen the following system for our benchmarks and tests:
- Gigabyte X470 Aorus Gaming 7 Wi-Fi (BIOS T2b, Default Settings, XMP 1 for DDR4-3400)
- MSI X470 Gaming M7 AC (BIOS 1.11T3, Default Settings, XMP 1 for DDR4-3400)
- Antec 1200 Watts power supply
- G-Skill Siper X DDR4-3400 memory kit 2 x 8 GB, set to DDR4-3400
- SanDisk Ultra II 240 GB
- XFX AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Motherboard, memory, and CPUs have been provided by AMD.
CPU Benchmarks
As expected, the Ryzen 7 2700X dominated the multithread benchmarks. After all, unlike Intel’s six-core i7-8700K it offers eight cores, and its performance has been noticeably improved over last year’s Ryzen 7 1800X. In fact, even the Ryzen 5 2600X was capable of beating the 1800X quite a few times. Single-core performance, however, was still dominated by Intel’s Coffee Lake CPUs, and the i7-8700K was up to 13% faster in Cinebench R15 single-thread and Geekbench 4.1/4.2.
Ryzen 5 2600X
Ryzen 7 2700X
Performance Rating - Percent | |
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X | |
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X | |
Intel Core i7-8700K -2! | |
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X -3! | |
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X -4! | |
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 -6! | |
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G | |
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G | |
AMD Ryzen 5 1500X -1! | |
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 -5! |
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Intel Core i7-8700K | |
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X | |
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X | |
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X | |
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G | |
AMD Ryzen 5 1500X | |
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X | |
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G | |
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 | |
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X | |
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X | |
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X | |
Intel Core i7-8700K | |
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X | |
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 | |
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 | |
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G | |
AMD Ryzen 5 1500X | |
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G |
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G | |
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G | |
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X | |
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
wPrime 2.10 | |
32m | |
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G | |
AMD Ryzen 5 1500X | |
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G | |
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X | |
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 | |
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X | |
Intel Core i7-8700K | |
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X | |
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X | |
1024m | |
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G | |
AMD Ryzen 5 1500X | |
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G | |
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 | |
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X | |
Intel Core i7-8700K | |
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X | |
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X | |
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 | |
Pass 1 | |
Intel Core i7-8700K | |
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X | |
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X | |
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X | |
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G | |
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 | |
AMD Ryzen 5 1500X | |
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X | |
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G | |
Pass 2 | |
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X | |
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X | |
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X | |
Intel Core i7-8700K | |
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X | |
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 | |
AMD Ryzen 5 1500X | |
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G | |
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G |
WinRAR - Result | |
Intel Core i7-8700K | |
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X | |
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X | |
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X | |
AMD Ryzen 5 1500X | |
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G | |
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 | |
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X | |
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G | |
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 |
TrueCrypt | |
AES Mean 100MB | |
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X | |
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X | |
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X | |
Intel Core i7-8700K | |
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X | |
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 | |
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 | |
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G | |
AMD Ryzen 5 1500X | |
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G | |
Twofish Mean 100MB | |
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X | |
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X | |
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X | |
Intel Core i7-8700K | |
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X | |
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 | |
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 | |
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G | |
AMD Ryzen 5 1500X | |
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G | |
Serpent Mean 100MB | |
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X | |
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X | |
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X | |
Intel Core i7-8700K | |
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X | |
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 | |
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 | |
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G | |
AMD Ryzen 5 1500X | |
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G |
Geekbench 4.4 | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
Intel Core i7-8700K | |
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X | |
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X | |
AMD Ryzen 5 1500X | |
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G | |
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X | |
Intel Core i7-8700K | |
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X | |
AMD Ryzen 5 1500X | |
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G | |
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance Physics | |
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X | |
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X | |
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X | |
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 | |
AMD Ryzen 5 1500X | |
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G | |
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G |
* ... smaller is better
Throttling is a big issue for mobile gamers. However, neither the Ryzen 5 2600X nor the Ryzen 7 2700X showed any signs of performance throttling whatsoever, as can be seen in the two graphs below. Thus, both have passed our stress test with flying colors.
This serves to prove once again that AMD’s included stock cooler (Wraith Prism LED, Wraith Spire) do a fantastic job.
Gaming Performance
Both new processors have profited immensely from their architectural improvements when it comes to gaming performance. Particularly those games that are not yet optimized for multi-core processors tend to benefit from higher clock speeds. The new generation also scores with its architectural improvements: The Ryzen 7 2700X managed to keep a rock-solid 4 GHz turbo boost under load.
The higher the resolution the less influence CPU performance has, and the bottleneck shifts from CPU to GPU. This can be seen in our gaming benchmark results where the difference between the two Ryzen CPUs is quite significant in lower resolutions and becomes negligible in higher resolutions. In 4K, the Ryzen 5 2600X and Ryzen 7 2700X only differ by a few percent.
Compared to the competition by Intel the AMD Ryzen 7 2700X did very well, and it can thus be considered a viable alternative.
Both our test systems were equipped with an AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 and thus offered plenty of performance to run all current games in 1080p at maximum settings. Gaming in UHD, however, will require some compromises and reduced details here and there.
Performance Rating - Percent | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) -2! | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) -2! | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) -3! | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) -2! | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile -2! | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile -2! | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) -1! |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) |
3DMark | |
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 | |
1280x720 Sky Diver Graphics | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) | |
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) |
Performance Rating - Percent | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile -43! | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) -38! | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) -42! | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) -42! | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) -42! | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 -35! | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) -33! |
BioShock Infinite | |
1280x720 Very Low Preset | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
1366x768 Medium Preset | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 |
Rise of the Tomb Raider | |
1024x768 Lowest Preset | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
1366x768 Medium Preset AF:2x | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
3840x2160 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 |
Battlefield 1 | |
1280x720 Low Preset | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
1366x768 Medium Preset AA:FX | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
3840x2160 High Preset AA:T | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 |
Battlefield 4 | |
1024x768 Low Preset | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
1366x768 Medium Preset | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
3840x2160 High Preset | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 |
Assassin´s Creed Origins | |
1280x720 Very Low Preset | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) | |
1920x1080 Medium Preset | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) | |
3840x2160 Ultra High Preset | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | |
1280x720 Lite Quality | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) | |
1920x1080 Standard Quality | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) | |
3840x2160 High Quality | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 |
Star Wars Battlefront 2 | |
1280x720 Low Preset | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) | |
1920x1080 Medium Preset | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) |
Deus Ex Mankind Divided | |
1280x720 Low Preset AF:1x | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) | |
1366x768 Medium Preset AF:2x | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
3840x2160 High Preset AF:4x | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 |
Far Cry Primal | |
1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:SM | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
3840x2160 High Preset AA:SM | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 |
For Honor | |
1280x720 Low Preset | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) | |
3840x2160 High Preset AA:T AF:8x | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 |
Ghost Recon Wildlands | |
1280x720 Low Preset | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
3840x2160 Very High Preset AA:T AF:8x | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 |
Kingdom Come: Deliverance | |
1280x720 Low Preset | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) | |
1920x1080 Medium Preset | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) | |
3840x2160 Ultra High Preset | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 |
The Division | |
1280x720 Low Preset AF:1x | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
1366x768 Medium Preset AF:4x | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
3840x2160 High Preset AF:8x | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 |
The Witcher 3 | |
1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) | |
1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 |
Watch Dogs 2 | |
1280x720 Low Preset | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
1366x768 Medium Preset | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
3840x2160 High Preset | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 |
F1 2017 | |
1280x720 Ultra Low Preset | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) | |
3840x2160 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 |
Far Cry 5 | |
1280x720 Low Preset AA:T | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) | |
1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) | |
3840x2160 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 |
Ryzen 5 2600X
low | med. | high | ultra | 4K | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 299.1 | 274 | 245.9 | 164.4 | |
Battlefield 4 (2013) | 200 | 200 | 200 | 139.5 | 76.4 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 258.5 | 201.1 | 127 | 73.3 | 47.7 |
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 262.2 | 174.7 | 108.5 | 91.3 | 44.6 |
Far Cry Primal (2016) | 120 | 106 | 95 | 89 | 48 |
The Division (2016) | 205.3 | 171.4 | 121.8 | 101.7 | 50.9 |
Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016) | 115.9 | 109.1 | 97 | 49.3 | 36.2 |
Battlefield 1 (2016) | 181.4 | 164.7 | 148.9 | 135.2 | 61.4 |
Watch Dogs 2 (2016) | 98.3 | 92.3 | 83 | 65.7 | 36.2 |
For Honor (2017) | 285.6 | 168.9 | 161.7 | 126.3 | 50.4 |
Ghost Recon Wildlands (2017) | 110 | 81.1 | 79.8 | 52.3 | 37.6 |
F1 2017 (2017) | 208 | 183 | 167 | 133 | 91 |
Assassin´s Creed Origins (2017) | 68 | 64 | 63 | 57 | 34 |
Star Wars Battlefront 2 (2017) | 198.3 | 150.8 | 130 | 108.1 | 42.7 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 133.6 | 88.2 | 58.9 | 27.7 | |
Kingdom Come: Deliverance (2018) | 126.3 | 111.4 | 86.1 | 63.9 | 34.6 |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 122 | 106 | 100 | 98 | 44 |
Ryzen 7 2700X
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | 4K | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 308.4 | 289.1 | 266.6 | 170.7 | ||
Battlefield 4 (2013) | 200 | 200 | 200 | 142.5 | 77 | |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 318.2 | 222.3 | 132.3 | 77 | 49.1 | |
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 263.7 | 178.5 | 113.6 | 91.5 | 50.4 | |
Far Cry Primal (2016) | 127 | 114 | 103 | 96 | 49 | |
The Division (2016) | 236.1 | 185.1 | 126 | 102.3 | 50.6 | |
Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016) | 114.5 | 122.6 | 104.9 | 54.9 | 37.5 | |
Battlefield 1 (2016) | 199.1 | 197.5 | 162.1 | 145.1 | 65.2 | |
Watch Dogs 2 (2016) | 115.7 | 102.4 | 92.3 | 68.2 | 36.9 | |
For Honor (2017) | 263.8 | 170.3 | 163 | 127.7 | 49 | |
Ghost Recon Wildlands (2017) | 127.6 | 95 | 89.8 | 53 | 36.7 | |
F1 2017 (2017) | 230 | 211 | 186 | 144 | 95 | |
Assassin´s Creed Origins (2017) | 76 | 71 | 70 | 63 | 33 | |
Star Wars Battlefront 2 (2017) | 198.3 | 160.7 | 140.6 | 121.2 | 42.3 | |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 145.6 | 87.7 | 58.5 | 27.9 | ||
Kingdom Come: Deliverance (2018) | 152 | 128.4 | 98.2 | 72.9 | 36.5 | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 125 | 110 | 104 | 99 | 44 | |
Monster Hunter World (2018) | 116.1 | 107.4 | 103.9 | 85.2 | 28.9 | |
F1 2018 (2018) | 141 | 123 | 102 | 86 | 49 | |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 107 | 105 | 100 | 85 | 29 | |
FIFA 19 (2018) | 322.5 | 320.5 | 294.2 | 287.8 | 161.4 | |
Forza Horizon 4 (2018) | 200 | 158 | 150 | 121 | 62 | |
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey (2018) | 73 | 66 | 61 | 50 | 29 | |
Call of Duty Black Ops 4 (2018) | 252.9 | 186.3 | 174.2 | 166.2 | 58.8 | |
Hitman 2 (2018) | 91 | 89.7 | 82.7 | 78.2 | 47.4 | |
Fallout 76 (2018) | 60 | 60 | 59.8 | 59.8 | 49.3 | |
Battlefield V (2018) | 194.4 | 165.4 | 145.7 | 138.7 | 60.3 | |
Farming Simulator 19 (2018) | 189.7 | 140.6 | 118.7 | 100 | 41.5 | |
Darksiders III (2018) | 190.1 | 123.2 | 109 | 99.4 | 35.8 | |
Just Cause 4 (2018) | 115.7 | 108 | 93.2 | 92.3 | 36.4 | |
Apex Legends (2019) | 144 | 144 | 133 | 131 | 93 | 52.1 |
Far Cry New Dawn (2019) | 110 | 97 | 93 | 85 | 79 | 47 |
Metro Exodus (2019) | 144.5 | 95.4 | 68.4 | 56.4 | 45.7 | 45.7 |
Anthem (2019) | 107 | 94 | 94 | 93 | 73 | 40.9 |
Dirt Rally 2.0 (2019) | 202.8 | 160 | 141.2 | 89.7 | 69.3 | 41.5 |
The Division 2 (2019) | 157 | 126 | 98 | 78 | 58 | 32 |
Anno 1800 (2019) | 97 | 93 | 80 | 33.1 | 24.1 | 14.8 |
Rage 2 (2019) | 228 | 125 | 109 | 106 | 69 | 33.5 |
F1 2019 (2019) | 245 | 202 | 170 | 124 | 93 | 54 |
Application Performance
Both Ryzen systems performed very well overall and managed to outperform Intel’s Core i7-8700K in PCMark 10 by 19% and 26%, respectively. Application performance has certainly benefitted from the higher clock speeds, most importantly in multi-core load scenarios where frequencies now managed to remain high on all cores. Compare that to the Ryzen 7 1800X, where the third core ran at a reduced frequency of just 3.7 GHz already.
That being said, we were much more impressed by the Ryzen 5 2600X’s performance, especially considering its price tag of just $230.
PCMark 10 - Score | |
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X | |
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X | |
Intel Core i7-8700K | |
AMD Ryzen 5 1500X | |
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G | |
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G |
PCMark 8 | |
Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X | |
Intel Core i7-8700K | |
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X | |
AMD Ryzen 5 1500X | |
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X | |
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 | |
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X | |
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G | |
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G | |
Creative Score Accelerated v2 | |
AMD Ryzen 5 1500X | |
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X | |
Intel Core i7-8700K | |
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X | |
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G | |
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G | |
Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X | |
Intel Core i7-8700K | |
AMD Ryzen 5 1500X | |
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X | |
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 | |
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X | |
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X | |
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G | |
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G |
Temperatures
We have tested both included coolers in our test system with Prime95 to determine their capabilities at maximum load. The Ryzen 5 2600X reached 71 °C at a stable 3.9 GHz while the Ryzen 7 2700X managed 3.95 GHz at just 70.5 °C.
According to AMD the Wraith Prism cooler is supposed to be more powerful than the default cooler designed for a TDP of 95 W. Using the Noctua NH-D15S supposedly improves the Ryzen 7 2700X’s performance even further, albeit just by 3%.
Temperatures - CPU Temperature Prime95 | |
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G | |
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G | |
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X | |
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
Noise
Both included coolers were very quiet when the system was idle. Under load, however, they became pretty noisy. We did notice that both increased their revs for short periods of time regularly even though we left the fan settings unchanged and had all BIOS settings set to “normal”. If you happen to be bothered by this behavior you will have to adjust the fan settings manually either in your motherboard’s BIOS setup or using the various tools motherboard manufacturers offer these days in order to reduce fan noise in medium load scenarios.
If, however, you are interested in an even quieter system we suggest getting a different cooler instead, for example pre-assembled all-in-one liquid coolers that are both effective and quiet.
Fans of RGB lighting will love the new Wraith Prism LED cooler - we have to admit that it did look pretty darn good indeed.
Wraith Prism LED (Ryzen 7 2700X RGB cooler)
Power Consumption
With no load whatsoever the power consumption was 71 W and 74 W for the Ryzen 5 2600X and Ryzen 7 2700X, respectively (entire system without display). Running Cinebench R15 the Ryzen 7 2700X shoots up to 219 W while the Ryzen 5 2600X remains at a more manageable 165 W. The results were similar when running Prime95: 211 W for the Ryzen 7 2700X and 171 W for the Ryzen 5 2600X.
We also took a closer look at gaming loads and discovered that while running The Witcher 3, the Ryzen 5 2600X consumed 13 W more. We would like to emphasize the fact that we were measuring at the wall and these numbers therefore include the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64.
Power Consumption | |
Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor) | |
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X (Idle: 74.3 W) | |
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X | |
1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor) | |
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X | |
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X (Idle: 74.3 W) |
* ... smaller is better
Overclocking
In order to squeeze out more performance many users run their processors at clock speeds higher than those specified by the manufacturer. Both X-models feature an unlocked multiplier, which means they are overclockable by default. That being said, their overclocking potential was fairly limited - something we have already encountered in the Ryzen 7 1800X.
We have chosen the Ryzen 7 2700X in order to determine the maximum clock speeds achievable with the stock cooler as well as an all-in-one liquid cooler by a company called be quiet!.
Using the Wraith Prism LED cooler our Ryzen 7 2700X managed a stable 4.15 GHz on all cores, and thus it was just 200 MHz more than out of the box. Another 0.05 GHz more was doable with the all-in-one liquid cooler. In other words: The new Ryzen CPUs have rather limited overclocking abilities and will require a custom-built high-performance water-cooling solution.
Power consumption while overclocked at 4.15 GHz rose from 219 W to 262 W in Cinebench R15. This constitutes a significant increase in relation to the performance gains, and we would thus advise against overclocking.
Verdict
AMD’s revised Zen architecture is more than just a simple refresh. The Zen+ architecture has been improved significantly and is now capable of achieving higher performance levels at virtually unchanged energy requirements. The Ryzen 7 2700X is the new flagship in town and successor to the Ryzen 7 1800X. Both new CPUs are very competitively priced and up to the task to compete with Intel’s current line-up for the best price-performance ratio. They have already won the battle for multithreaded workloads hands down, but for single-threaded workloads the i7-8700K remains king of the hill.
Even the non-flagship Ryzen models constitute a significant improvement over their predecessors and are around 10% faster. With its six cores the Ryzen 5 2600X offers adequate performance for its price of just $230.
The new Ryzen CPUs have improved in both single and multithreaded performance. With its new Zen+ processors, AMD is able to close the gap to Intel’s Coffee Lake. However, there are no clear victors in this battle for processing superiority as both competitors have their distinct pros and cons.
An X470 motherboard is not a requirement for the new CPUs per se, but it is recommended due to its support for XFR2 Enhanced and Precision Boost Overdrive, both of which allow the Ryzen CPUs to clock a little bit higher and run that extra little bit faster. If, however, you decide to stick with the X370 platform a BIOS update will be mandatory in order to support the new processors. Some hardware vendors will even offer to flash the BIOS for you prior to purchase so that your new hardware will be ready to go when you receive it.
Overall, both Ryzen CPUs offered a more than decent performance, and both are recommendable for gamers as well. The fact that AMD again includes a very good cooler that even offers RGB lighting in the case of the flagship model is highly commendable.