
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake review - A slap in the face for Windows on ARM
The Surface laptop is better with Intel.
Last year, Microsoft switched its Surface devices completely to ARM processors from Qualcomm. However, it doesn't seem that business customers want these devices, as the Surface Laptop 15 for Business is now available with Intel's Lunar Lake processors. The result is better in many areas.Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (translated by Daisy Dickson) Published 🇩🇪 🇫🇷 ...
Verdict - The Surface Laptop 7 15 is better with Intel Lunar Lake
The new Surface Laptop 7 15 for Business, which is equipped with Intel processors, has advantages over the Snapdragon variant in a number of areas. These include better software compatibility, of course, but surprisingly also improved battery life. In addition, business customers don't seem to want Snapdragon laptops and in general, the Intel variant is simply the better overall package. This is a pretty harsh slap in the face for Windows on ARM, especially when you consider how hard Microsoft is pushing the ARM models.
Although the Lunar Lake processor delivers less multi-core CPU performance, it is on par in single-core scenarios and comes with a faster integrated graphics card as well as Thunderbolt 4. Its IPS screen boasts a high brightness and very accurate color profiles.
One disadvantage that remains for both models is their high surface temperatures under load, so a second fan would really make sense in this respect. The 15-inch model in particular still has quite a lot of free space in its case, which is why this technically shouldn't be a problem. It should also be mentioned that the Intel version's fan gets louder under high load, which is pretty much the only major disadvantage compared to the ARM model.
Finally, there is its price, and the Intel model is around $500 more expensive, going off its MRSP. However, the ARM models are often heavily discounted and the comparable Snapdragon configuration with 32 GB RAM and a 1-TB SSD currently costs around $1,599.99 from Microsoft itself, i.e. a whopping $1,000 less. Naturally, this difference can hardly be justified.
Pros
Cons
Price and availability
You can purchase various configurations of the Surface Laptop 7 15 for Business with Intel processors directly from Microsoft. Our configuration currently retails for $2,599.99.
Table of Contents
After Microsoft launched the current 7th generation of its Surface laptop exclusively with Qualcomm Snapdragon processors last year, the models with the "for Business" suffix are now also available with Intel processors. Today, we're testing the 15-inch model with the Core Ultra 7 268V, 32 GB RAM, a 1-TB SSD and the familiar IPS touchscreen for an MRSP of $2,599.99. Of course, we are particularly interested in the comparison with the ARM version, which we tested in detail just a few weeks ago.
Specifications
Differences to the Snapdragon model
The case of the Surface Laptop 7 15 with the Intel Lunar Lake processor isn't any different from the Snapdragon version. This includes the two colors platinum and black. We noted no quality issues, but the laptop's dark aluminum surfaces are susceptible to fingerprint marks. One positive aspect is how easy the components are to access, as there are only four T5 screws under the rubber feet and the base plate is held in place by magnets, so there are no annoying clips. Both the M.2-2242 SSD and the battery can be replaced if necessary and the fan can be cleaned.
The Intel model is also a Copilot+ laptop, but its two USB-C ports now support Thunderbolt 4. Microsoft could have installed more connections such as an additional USB-C port or an HDMI output, especially on the 15-inch model. Its Wi-Fi module also supports Wi-Fi 7 & Bluetooth 5.4, but it doesn't feature a 5G module. Its 2-MP webcam without a mechanical shutter is also the same and its microSD card reader (spring mechanism) is of average speed. The 15-inch model is optionally available with a SmartCard reader.
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Average of class Office (22.7 - 198.5, n=32, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Average of class Office (25 - 249, n=28, last 2 years) | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon (Angelbird AV Pro V60) |
Networking | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Apple MacBook Air 15 M4 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |

Input devices - Haptic touchpad
Its backlit keyboard is identical to that of the ARM model and in general, it feels comfortable to use even when composing longer texts. However, the ThinkPad X9 performs even better in this respect. Our test device's haptic touchpad worked very well during our test, boasting a smooth surface and quiet pressure point. The laptop's capacitive touchscreen can also be used for inputs.
Display - IPS at 600 nits and 120 Hz
The laptop's IPS touchscreen generally features good picture quality with vibrant colors, a frequency of 120 Hz and a 3:2 aspect ratio, which is particularly helpful for productive activities. In addition, the picture doesn't appear grainy even when depicting bright content. In contrast to OLED screens, there is also no PWM flickering. Furthermore, its brightness is great at just under 600 cd/m², but its black level is slightly higher, which brings us to its disadvantages compared to OLED panels. Both black level and contrast are simply weaker on IPS panels. The panel's resolution (2,496 x 1,664 pixels) is okay and its response times are unremarkable, but there is still some backlight bleeding. Both its brightness and color temperature can be automatically regulated via a sensor. Halos are not a problem despite its high brightness. HDR content is supported, but the display's maximum brightness remains unchanged at ~600 cd/m²
We have nothing negative to say about its calibration, which is already excellent straight out of the box. In our analysis with the professional CalMAN software, both the Vivid profile (P3 reference space) and the sRGB profile boasted extremely low color deviations. This makes the Surface Laptop 7 15 suitable for image/video editing.
|
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 599 cd/m²
Contrast: 1498:1 (Black: 0.4 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.86
ΔE Greyscale 0.6 | 0.09-98 Ø5.1
87.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.16
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake LQ150P1JX61, IPS, 2496x1664, 15", 120 Hz | Apple MacBook Air 15 M4 IPS, 2880x1864, 15.3", 60 Hz | Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition ATNA53JB01-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 15.3", 120 Hz | Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite Sharp LQ150P1JX61, IPS, 2496x1664, 15", 120 Hz | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura CSOT T3 MNF307ZB1-1, IPS, 2880x1800, 15.3", 120 Hz | Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon ATNA56AC03-0, OLED, 2880x1620, 15.6", 120 Hz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 1% | 3% | 0% | |||
Display P3 Coverage | 98.1 | 98.7 1% | 100 2% | 98.8 1% | ||
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 100 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% | ||
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 87.2 | 88.3 1% | 94.6 8% | 87.5 0% | ||
Response Times | 1% | 97% | -70% | -2% | 97% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 33.4 ? | 33.2 ? 1% | 1.46 ? 96% | 44.4 ? -33% | 27 ? 19% | 0.61 ? 98% |
Response Time Black / White * | 14.7 ? | 14.7 ? -0% | 0.44 ? 97% | 30.3 ? -106% | 17.9 ? -22% | 0.67 ? 95% |
PWM Frequency | 1200 ? | 240 ? | ||||
Screen | -117% | 365% | -46% | -123% | 100% | |
Brightness middle | 599 | 525 -12% | 509 -15% | 579.9 -3% | 509 -15% | 378 -37% |
Brightness | 590 | 513 -13% | 508 -14% | 576 -2% | 479 -19% | 379 -36% |
Brightness Distribution | 93 | 87 -6% | 97 4% | 92 -1% | 90 -3% | 98 5% |
Black Level * | 0.4 | 0.32 20% | 0.01 97% | 0.34 15% | 0.32 20% | 0.02 95% |
Contrast | 1498 | 1641 10% | 50900 3298% | 1706 14% | 1591 6% | 18900 1162% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 0.5 | 1.7 -240% | 1.1 -120% | 0.96 -92% | 2.47 -394% | 1 -100% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 0.9 | 4 -344% | 2.5 -178% | 2.39 -166% | 4.73 -426% | 2.6 -189% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 0.6 | 2.7 -350% | 1.5 -150% | 1.4 -133% | 1.5 -150% | 1.2 -100% |
Gamma | 2.16 102% | 2.2 100% | 2.28 96% | 2.13 103% | 2.19 100% | 2.19 100% |
CCT | 6543 99% | 7010 93% | 6294 103% | 6407 101% | 6790 96% | 6460 101% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.06 | |||||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -38% /
-72% | 155% /
240% | -58% /
-51% | -42% /
-76% | 99% /
99% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
14.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5.5 ms rise | |
↘ 9.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 33 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.7 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
33.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 12.5 ms rise | |
↘ 20.9 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 43 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.4 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8439 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Performance - Lunar Lake with 32 GB RAM
Testing conditions
In contrast to the previous Surface Laptop models, the energy profiles of the Surface Laptop 7 15 for Business feature the usual energy mode designations (Best Energy Efficiency, Balanced, Best Performance). We carried out the following benchmarks and measurements using Best Performance mode.
Processor
Our test configuration uses the Core Ultra 7 268V with vPro. The Lunar Lake chips' pure multi-core performance is inferior to the competition, but their single-core performance is good—only Apple's M4 came ahead of all competitors here. Overall, this model's performance is completely sufficient for most office tasks. Its performance remains constant in battery mode, but its multi-core performance drops by around 13% under longer load.
Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 268V | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura -2! | |
Average of class Office | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite -2! | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 268V (9835 - 10868, n=3) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
Average of class Office (1577 - 20399, n=88, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 268V (1910 - 1985, n=3) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
Average of class Office (618 - 1958, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 268V (3811 - 4255, n=3) | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
Average of class Office (590 - 8086, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 268V (736 - 764, n=3) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
Average of class Office (229 - 766, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
Average of class Office (246 - 3132, n=90, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 268V (1601 - 1651, n=3) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 268V (287 - 302, n=3) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake | |
Average of class Office (98 - 294, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Average of class Office (163 - 1956, n=89, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 268V (337 - 410, n=3) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
Average of class Office (7532 - 76886, n=90, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 268V (32797 - 36610, n=3) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 268V (5884 - 6021, n=3) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Average of class Office (2972 - 6497, n=89, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 268V (9491 - 9855, n=4) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
Average of class Office (1018 - 14192, n=88, last 2 years) |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 268V (2008 - 2097, n=4) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
Average of class Office (510 - 2096, n=89, last 2 years) |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 268V (10.4 - 12.9, n=3) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
Average of class Office (1.72 - 22.4, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
Average of class Office (31.3 - 129.6, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 268V (48 - 60.8, n=3) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
Average of class Office (0.4098 - 1.135, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 268V (0.4344 - 0.4565, n=3) |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Average of class Office | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 268V | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 268V (10556 - 12759, n=3) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
Average of class Office (763 - 31245, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 268V (47659 - 62102, n=3) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
Average of class Office (4113 - 125394, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake | |
Average of class Office (287 - 5398, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 268V (2117 - 2784, n=3) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Average of class Office (8185 - 115197, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 268V (49630 - 49759, n=3) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Average of class Office (404 - 18321, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 268V (4353 - 4429, n=3) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 268V (25929 - 31836, n=3) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
Average of class Office (2075 - 66922, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
Average of class Office (7254 - 155900, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 268V (33196 - 38941, n=3) |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
Average of class Office (78 - 1366, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 268V (441 - 631, n=3) |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 268V (5938 - 6803, n=3) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake | |
Average of class Office (432 - 17834, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 268V (46733 - 54886, n=3) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
Average of class Office (4814 - 55359, n=88, last 2 years) |
System performance
As expected, the Surface Laptop 7 15 with the Intel processor is a very responsive device, but unlike the ARM model, it faces no compatibility issues with x86 apps.
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 268V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (6729 - 7236, n=3) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Average of class Office (2463 - 7578, n=78, last 2 years) |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 268V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (10007 - 10701, n=3) | |
Average of class Office (5575 - 20841, n=78, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 268V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (8766 - 9217, n=3) | |
Average of class Office (3041 - 10415, n=78, last 2 years) |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 268V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (9425 - 10427, n=3) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Average of class Office (2049 - 11108, n=78, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Apple MacBook Air 15 M4 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 268V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (1643 - 1763, n=3) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Average of class Office (348 - 1891, n=83, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Apple MacBook Air 15 M4 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 268V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (1577 - 1696, n=3) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Average of class Office (393 - 1870, n=83, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Apple MacBook Air 15 M4 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 268V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (1866 - 2021, n=3) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Average of class Office (340 - 2155, n=83, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Apple MacBook Air 15 M4 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 268V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (1267 - 1313, n=3) | |
Average of class Office (258 - 2017, n=83, last 2 years) | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Apple MacBook Air 15 M4 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 268V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (266 - 310, n=3) | |
Average of class Office (121 - 455, n=82, last 2 years) |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Apple MacBook Air 15 M4 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 268V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (245 - 287, n=3) | |
Average of class Office (80 - 328, n=82, last 2 years) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Average of class Office (399 - 1966, n=91, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 268V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (468 - 476, n=3) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
Apple MacBook Air 15 M4 |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 7236 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 268V (100445 - 108317, n=3) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
Average of class Office (7158 - 108783, n=89, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 268V (82511 - 88341, n=3) | |
Average of class Office (7325 - 127282, n=89, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 268V (115959 - 117888, n=3) | |
Average of class Office (7579 - 117935, n=89, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Average of class Office (7.6 - 185.2, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 268V (94.4 - 101.2, n=3) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite |
* ... smaller is better
DPC latencies
In our standardized latency test (surfing the web, 4K YouTube playback, CPU load), the Surface laptop with the current BIOS version showed no limitations whatsoever. Although one driver showed a deflection, the important "interrupt-to-process-latency" value was low.
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake |
* ... smaller is better
Storage device
A 1-TB version of the Samsung PM9C1A is installed in our test device (M.2-2242), with 899 GB available after first starting up the laptop. The PCIe 4.0 SSD's performance was very good during our test and remained stable.
* ... smaller is better
Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
Graphics card
The Arc Graphics 140V was significantly faster in the benchmarks than the ARM version's Adreno X1-85 and as a result of its better compatibility, the Intel model is much better suited for the occasional gaming. The GPU's performance remains constant both in battery mode and under prolonged load.
3DMark 11 Performance | 12919 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 9375 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 4721 points | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 910 points | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score | 3555 points | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | 3529 points | |
Help |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
Average of class Office (245 - 3964, n=85, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
Average Intel Arc Graphics 140V (509 - 700, n=23) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Apple MacBook Air 15 M4 |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom oneAPI/Intel | |
Average of class Office (230 - 416, n=5, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Arc Graphics 140V (205 - 405, n=11) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom METAL | |
Apple MacBook Air 15 M4 |
* ... smaller is better
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Apple MacBook Air 15 M4 | |
Average of class Office (6.65 - 29.6, n=43, last 2 years) | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
Average of class Office (3.98 - 47.8, n=77, last 2 years) |
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
Average of class Office (12.8 - 61.7, n=66, last 2 years) |
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Average of class Office (8.88 - 92.6, n=81, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS diagram
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 167.4 | 152.5 | 59.6 | 25.3 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 101.2 | 68.2 | 45.2 | 82.4 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 93.3 | 49.8 | 36.4 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 55.2 | 44.3 | 37.9 | |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 245 | 86.7 | 73.2 | 61.7 |
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 42.6 | 29.9 | 28.7 | 27.4 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 38.7 | 36.8 | 32.9 | 29.6 |
Emissions & energy
Noise emissions
The Surface Laptop 7 15 is a quiet device during everyday use and you'll often only hear a subtle hiss. Under very high load (e.g. when gaming or during the stress test), however, the fan becomes noticeably louder than the ARM model—at least in Best Performance mode—with a maximum of 41.9 dB(A). This noise level lasted for a few minutes. The high frequency is also a little annoying, and a cooling solution with two fans would definitely have been the better option in this case. In the other two modes, Balanced (max. 36.3 dB(A)) and Best Energy Efficiency (max. 34.7 dB(A)), the laptop stays a lot quieter. We noted no other electronic noises coming from our test device.
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23.9 / 23.9 / 23.9 dB(A) |
Load |
| 31.8 / 41.9 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 268V, Samsung PM9C1a MZ9L81T0HDLB | Apple MacBook Air 15 M4 M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), Apple SSD AP1024Z | Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, WD PC SN740 SDDQMQD-1T00 | Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 256V | Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -5% | 10% | 1% | -1% | ||
off / environment * | 23.9 | 24.4 -2% | 23.3 3% | 23.2 3% | 24.3 -2% | |
Idle Minimum * | 23.9 | 24.4 -2% | 23.3 3% | 23.2 3% | 24.3 -2% | |
Idle Average * | 23.9 | 24.4 -2% | 23.3 3% | 23.2 3% | 24.3 -2% | |
Idle Maximum * | 23.9 | 24.4 -2% | 23.3 3% | 26.1 -9% | 26.2 -10% | |
Load Average * | 31.8 | 35.8 -13% | 25.7 19% | 30.9 3% | 32.5 -2% | |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 38 | 39.4 -4% | 31.1 18% | 34.1 10% | 35.2 7% | |
Load Maximum * | 41.9 | 45 -7% | 33.2 21% | 44.3 -6% | 39.8 5% |
* ... smaller is better
Temperature
Its surfaces remain nice and cool in idle mode and under low load, but the upper side of its case in particular gets relatively warm under high load—this is noticeable when typing. Once again, this shows that a second fan would be put to good use. We measured a maximum of 43 °C on the underside, so you can rest the laptop on your thighs without any problems even under full load. During the stress test, its consumption leveled off at around 25 watts.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.7 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.9 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.9 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 37.4 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the class Office.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.6 °C / 88.9 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (-4 °C / -7.2 F).
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake Intel Core Ultra 7 268V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V | Apple MacBook Air 15 M4 Apple M4 (10 cores), Apple M4 10-core GPU | Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V | Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V | Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -0% | 2% | 6% | -22% | -13% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 45.7 | 44.9 2% | 42.1 8% | 45.4 1% | 46.2 -1% | 43.6 5% |
Maximum Bottom * | 42.9 | 43.9 -2% | 39.5 8% | 37.2 13% | 41 4% | 53.1 -24% |
Idle Upper Side * | 23.6 | 23.4 1% | 24.5 -4% | 22.4 5% | 34 -44% | 26.7 -13% |
Idle Bottom * | 23.1 | 23.5 -2% | 24.4 -6% | 22 5% | 33.8 -46% | 27.2 -18% |
* ... smaller is better
Speakers
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M4 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (1.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (5.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Power consumption
The Intel model requires slightly more energy than the ARM version when idling, but both have a maximum consumption of around 65 watts under full load. During the stress test, however, this value stabilized at around 46 watts, which is why the 65-watt power supply unit supplied is generally sufficient in size.
Off / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Idle | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Load |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Key:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake Core Ultra 7 268V, Arc 140V, Samsung PM9C1a MZ9L81T0HDLB, IPS, 2496x1664, 15" | Apple MacBook Air 15 M4 M4 (10 cores), M4 10-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP1024Z, IPS, 2880x1864, 15.3" | Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V, WD PC SN740 SDDQMQD-1T00, OLED, 2880x1800, 15.3" | Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ, IPS, 2496x1664, 15" | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura Core Ultra 7 256V, Arc 140V, , IPS, 2880x1800, 15.3" | Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM, OLED, 2880x1620, 15.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 19% | 23% | 10% | -0% | 10% | |
Idle Minimum * | 3.2 | 2.2 31% | 2.4 25% | 3 6% | 3.4 -6% | 4.4 -38% |
Idle Average * | 8.7 | 11.5 -32% | 3.9 55% | 8.3 5% | 8.8 -1% | 6.2 29% |
Idle Maximum * | 9 | 11.6 -29% | 5.1 43% | 8.4 7% | 9.3 -3% | 7.5 17% |
Load Average * | 44.7 | 34.5 23% | 42.5 5% | 34.3 23% | 45.4 -2% | 33.6 25% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 51.1 | 24.4 52% | 43.5 15% | 45.8 10% | 49.4 3% | 39 24% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 49.3 | 26.2 47% | 40.2 18% | 41 17% | 44.8 9% | 38.9 21% |
Load Maximum * | 64.6 | 37.5 42% | 64.4 -0% | 65.2 -1% | 66.3 -3% | 69.3 -7% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 29.9 |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 ultra Efficiency | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite |
Power consumption Cyberpunk / stress test
Power consumption with external monitor
Runtimes
During our WLAN test, the Intel test device performed slightly better than the Snapdragon variant (both 64 Wh). At 150 cd/m², we measured 17:41 hours, which is almost three hours more than the Snapdragon model, and at full brightness, we noted just under 9 hours. A full charge takes 125 minutes with the device switched on (80% after ~60 minutes).
Notebookcheck total rating
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake
- 03/23/2025 v8
Andreas Osthoff
Possible alternatives compared
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake Intel Core Ultra 7 268V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140V ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,010.18 Microsoft Surface Laptop (20... 2. $1,399.99 Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 A... 3. $23.95 mCover Case ONLY Compatible ... List Price: 2760€ | 1.7 kg | 18.3 mm | 15.00" 2496x1664 200 PPI IPS | |
Apple MacBook Air 15 M4 Apple M4 (10 cores) ⎘ Apple M4 10-core GPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,049.00 Apple 2025 MacBook Air 15-in... 2. $1,049.00 Apple 2025 MacBook Air 13-in... 3. $1,799.95 Apple 2025 MacBook Air 15-in... List Price: 1999€ | 1.5 kg | 11.5 mm | 15.30" 2880x1864 224 PPI IPS | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition Intel Core Ultra 7 258V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140V ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $2,299.00 Lenovo ThinkPad X9 15 Aura E... 2. $2,121.43 Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Gen 1 ... 3. $1,824.15 Lenovo ThinkPad X9 15 Gen 1 ... List Price: 1989€ | 1.4 kg | 17.7 mm | 15.30" 2880x1800 222 PPI OLED | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 ⎘ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 256 GB SSD | Amazon: $1,399.99 List Price: 1100 USD | 1.7 kg | 18.29 mm | 15.00" 2496x1664 200 PPI IPS | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura Intel Core Ultra 7 256V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140V ⎘ 16 GB Memory | Amazon: 1. $1,188.00 Lenovo Slim 7i Aura Copilot+... 2. $15.88 MUBUY-GOL Anti Blue Light Sc... 3. $1,144.24 Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 3K OLED ... List Price: 1380 USD | 1.5 kg | 13.9 mm | 15.30" 2880x1800 222 PPI IPS | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 ⎘ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $849.99 ASUS Vivobook S 15 Laptop; C... 2. $830.00 ASUS Vivobook S 15 OLED Lapt... 3. $649.99 ASUS Vivobook 14 Laptop, 14�... List Price: 1299€ | 1.4 kg | 15.9 mm | 15.60" 2880x1620 212 PPI OLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.