Notebookcheck Logo
Teaser

MSI Claw 8 AI+ review - The best gaming handheld thanks to Intel Lunar Lake?

Massive improvement.

MSI's new Claw 8 AI+ is a massive improvement of the manufacturer's first gaming handheld. Adding to this is its more efficient Lunar Lake processor from Intel, as well as a larger 8-inch display with a 120-Hz refresh rate and VRR, and a big 80-Wh battery.
Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (translated by Daisy Dickson) Published 🇩🇪 🇫🇷 ...
AI Arc Handheld Gaming Laptop Lunar Lake Thunderbolt Touchscreen Wi-Fi 7 Windows

Verdict - The MSI Claw 8 AI+ is one of the best gaming handhelds, but is also very expensive

MSI has improved the second generation of its gaming handheld massively, but this was much needed after how poorly the original performed. Its inefficient Meteor Lake processor was particularly problematic. Thanks to the new Claw 8 AI+'s Lunar Lake chip, however, this model does a lot better. This means better gaming performance (also compared to the ROG Ally X), lower consumption and longer runtimes. Its fans have also gotten quieter, but MSI should really take a look at their fluctuating speed under constant load.

In terms of connectivity, the device's second USB-C port is a very welcome addition and its larger IPS screen is also impressive with its 120-Hz refresh rate and VRR, but its response times are slightly worse than the predecessor model model.

The MSI software works well overall, but is sometimes a little laggy and its range of functions can't keep up with its Asus counterpart. The handheld's energy profiles are also a little awkward, as its AI engine only provides reduced performance. Its price of $899.99 is justified in our eyes given its performance and features, but it is of course no bargain.

Pros

+ good gaming performance
+ 120-Hz display and VRR
+ stable and high-quality case
+ good input devices
+ very long runtimes
+ very good speakers
+ 32 GB RAM, 2x Thunderbolt 4 & Wi-Fi 7
+ exchangeable M.2-2230 SSD
+ speedy microSD card reader

Cons

- complicated energy profiles
- fan speed fluctuates under load
- no webcam
- MSI software a little laggy at times

Price and availability

The MSI Claw 8 AI+ retails for $899.99 and is available via major online retailers such as Amazon.

Possible alternatives compared

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Height
Display
1.
84.7%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V ⎘
Intel Arc Graphics 140V ⎘
32 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD
Amazon:
1. $479.50
MSI Claw PC Gaming Handheld:...
2. $969.88
MSI Claw AI Powered Handheld...
3. $799.99
MSI Claw AI Powered Handheld...
List Price: 999€
793 g30 mm8.00"
1920x1200
283 PPI
IPS
2.
84.6%
Asus ROG Ally X
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme ⎘
AMD Radeon 780M ⎘
24 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD
Amazon: $599.99
List Price: 899€
685 g36.9 mm7.00"
1920x1080
315 PPI
IPS
3.
68.3%
Lenovo Legion Go S
Lenovo Legion Go S
AMD Ryzen Z2 Go ⎘
AMD Radeon 680M ⎘
16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD
Amazon:
1. $600.00
Lenovo Legion Go 8.8" 144Hz ...
2. $19.95
BoxWave Screen Protector Com...
3. $64.99
Legion Go USB-C Hub Dock for...
List Price: 700€
738 g22.6 mm8.00"
1920x1200
283 PPI
IPS-Grade
4.
88.9% v7 (old)
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU ⎘
AMD Radeon Steam Deck 8CU ⎘
16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD
Amazon: $639.97
List Price: 679€
640 g49 mm7.40"
1280x800
204 PPI
OLED
5.
80.2%
GPD Pocket 4
GPD Pocket 4
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 ⎘
AMD Radeon 890M ⎘
32 GB Memory
List Price: 1400 USD777 g22.2 mm8.80"
2560x1600
343 PPI
IPS
6.
77.4%
MSI Claw
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H ⎘
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU ⎘
16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD
Amazon: $479.50
List Price: 849€
672 g33 mm7.00"
1920x1080
315 PPI
IPS
7.
84.9% v7 (old)
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U ⎘
AMD Radeon 780M ⎘
32 GB Memory
Amazon:
List Price: 1017 USD
876 g43 mm8.40"
2560x1600
IPS

MSI's Claw 8 AI+ is the second and significantly improved generation of the manufacturer's gaming handheld, which still uses Intel processors. Our test device is the MSI Claw 8 AI+ AV2M-015 version for $899.99 featuring the Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (Lunar Lake), 32 GB RAM, a 1-TB SSD and a new 8-inch IPS display with a refresh rate of 120 Hz and VRR.

Specifications

MSI Claw 8 AI+ (Claw Series)
Processor
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V 8 x 2.2 - 4.8 GHz, 37 W PL2 / Short Burst, 30 W PL1 / Sustained, Lunar Lake
Graphics adapter
Memory
32 GB 
, LPDDR5x-8533, Dual-Channel, onboard
Display
8.00 inch 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixel 283 PPI, Capacitive, PN8007QB1-2, IPS, 120 Hz
Storage
Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02, 512 GB 
, 869 GB free
Soundcard
Intel Lunar Lake SOC - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Connections
2 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 2 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm, Card Reader: microSD, 1 Fingerprint Reader
Networking
Intel BE201 320MHz (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.4
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 30 x 299 x 126 ( = 1.18 x 11.77 x 4.96 in)
Battery
80 Wh, 6900 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, 65W PSU, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
793 g ( = 27.97 oz / 1.75 pounds), Power Supply: 192 g ( = 6.77 oz / 0.42 pounds)
Price
999 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Case & connectivity

MSI has made significant changes to the handheld's design, as in addition to a larger case, its handles are now sand-colored, which looks great. This gives the device a more premium look and sets it apart from its competitors, which are generally just black. The two sticks once again feature LED rings. Despite its larger case, the Claw 8 feels good in your hands and we were able to play for longer periods of time without any problems. Its stability and build quality are really good and we noted no creaking noises.

The back of the case can be easily removed and the M.2-2230 SSD and battery can be replaced if necessary. There is now a second Thunderbolt 4 port available, and the device's fast microSD reader and Wi-Fi 7 module are still present. It is a Copilot+ device, but it doesn't have a webcam installed. Part of its packaging can be converted into a stand.

In direct comparison with the ROG Ally X, you immediately notice the difference made by its 8-inch display, but of course the handheld is also noticeably larger overall. Moreover, the Claw 8 weighs around 100 grams more.

MSI Claw 8 AI+ (bottom) vs. Asus ROG Ally X (top)
MSI Claw 8 AI+ (bottom) vs. Asus ROG Ally X (top)
MSI Claw 8 AI+ (left) vs. Asus ROG Ally X (right)
MSI Claw 8 AI+ (left) vs. Asus ROG Ally X (right)

Size comparison

311 mm / 12.2 in 135 mm / 5.31 in 43 mm / 1.693 in 876 g1.931 lbs298 mm / 11.7 in 117 mm / 4.61 in 49 mm / 1.929 in 640 g1.411 lbs299 mm / 11.8 in 126 mm / 4.96 in 30 mm / 1.181 in 793 g1.748 lbs294 mm / 11.6 in 117 mm / 4.61 in 33 mm / 1.299 in 672 g1.482 lbs299 mm / 11.8 in 127 mm / 5 in 22.6 mm / 0.89 in 738 g1.627 lbs280 mm / 11 in 111 mm / 4.37 in 36.9 mm / 1.453 in 685 g1.51 lbs206.8 mm / 8.14 in 144.5 mm / 5.69 in 22.2 mm / 0.874 in 777 g1.713 lbs297 mm / 11.7 in 210 mm / 8.27 in 1 mm / 0.03937 in 5.7 g0.01257 lbs
Connections: volume buttons, 3.5-mm audio, 2x USB-C 4.0 with Thunderbolt 4 (40 Gbit/s, DisplayPort ALT mode, Power Delivery 3.0), power button with fingerprint scanner
Connections: volume buttons, 3.5-mm audio, 2x USB-C 4.0 with Thunderbolt 4 (40 Gbit/s, DisplayPort ALT mode, Power Delivery 3.0), power button with fingerprint scanner
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
201 MB/s
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (Angelbird AV PRO microSD)
184.04 MB/s -8%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
121 MB/s -40%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (20.9 - 201, n=14, last 2 years)
114.5 MB/s -43%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme (Angelbird AV Pro v60)
89.2 MB/s -56%
Lenovo Legion Go S
AMD Ryzen Z2 Go
85.19 MB/s -58%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU
55 MB/s -73%
GPD Pocket 4
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
32.9 MB/s -84%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme (Angelbird AV Pro v60)
260.1 MB/s +19%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (Angelbird AV PRO microSD)
251.05 MB/s +15%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
218.7 MB/s
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
204.2 MB/s -7%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (74.7 - 260, n=13, last 2 years)
167.4 MB/s -23%
Lenovo Legion Go S
AMD Ryzen Z2 Go
89.85 MB/s -59%
GPD Pocket 4
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
74.7 MB/s -66%
Networking
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Intel BE201 320MHz
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1663 (min: 1554) MBit/s ∼93%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1561 (min: 1517) MBit/s ∼91%
Lenovo Legion Go S
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1783 (min: 1709) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1713 (min: 869) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1890 (min: 1782) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1747 (min: 1672) MBit/s ∼94%
GPD Pocket 4
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1281 (min: 1157) MBit/s ∼72%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1380 (min: 1142) MBit/s ∼81%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1224 (min: 1083) MBit/s ∼65%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
942 (min: 915) MBit/s ∼51%
Asus ROG Ally X
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1675 (min: 1467) MBit/s ∼94%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1686 (min: 1452) MBit/s ∼98%
MSI Claw
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750x BE200NGW
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1582 (min: 1462) MBit/s ∼89%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1524 (min: 1468) MBit/s ∼89%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
Quectel FC66E
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
917 (min: 866) MBit/s ∼51%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
999 (min: 941) MBit/s ∼58%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1762 (min: 1653) MBit/s ∼93%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1858 (min: 1771) MBit/s ∼100%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1553 (min: 1302) MBit/s ∼87%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1405 (min: 1179) MBit/s ∼82%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1532 (min: 1497) MBit/s ∼81%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1397 (min: 1288) MBit/s ∼75%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550160016501700Tooltip
MSI Claw 8 AI+; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø1663 (1554-1715)
MSI Claw 8 AI+; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1561 (1517-1595)

Sustainability

MSI hasn't provided any information on the device's sustainability, use of recycled materials or environmental certificates. Its packaging is mainly made of cardboard and can be recycled.

Software - MSI Center M

MSI Center M
MSI Center M

Anyone who has ever used Windows on a small touchscreen knows how awkward it is to operate. This makes the software supplied by the manufacturer all the more important for user experience. In the case of the Claw 8, as with its predecessor, the software it uses is MSI Center M, which opens automatically at startup. Installed games are displayed here and you can access all the settings. A customizable quick menu is also available, which can be used to adjust important settings (e.g. brightness, performance mode, performance monitoring, etc.) at any time. As with the old model, the app generally works well, although its overall range of functions is noticeably smaller than the ArmoryCrate SE software on the Asus ROG Ally X, and it is occasionally a little laggy.

Input devices - Hall-Effect triggers & sticks

Good triggers & sticks
Good triggers & sticks

MSI continues to use Hall Effect triggers and sticks for the Claw 8, which work very well in practice. The triggers in particular offer a little more resistance than the Ally X, for example, which feels a bit better when playing games. The D-pad is precise and quite quiet, while the regular buttons on the right-hand side are inconspicuous. Configuration options for the sticks and triggers are also available via the MSI software. The handheld's capacitive touchscreen can of course also be used for inputs.

Display - 8-inch IPS with a 120-Hz refresh rate and VRR

Sub-pixel array
Sub-pixel array
Slight backlight bleeding
Slight backlight bleeding

MSI has increased the size of the handheld's screen from 7 inches (16:9) to 8 inches (16:10, 1,920 x 1,080 pixels). Still, its basic features including its 120-Hz refresh rate and VRR support are the same. Furthermore, its picture quality is very good, even if its black levels and contrast levels naturally cannot keep up with those of OLED panels. No PWM flickering is used, but its response times have become slightly slower.

In our analysis using the professional CalMAN software, we measured an average brightness of 524 cd/m² and a good contrast ratio of more than 1,500:1. However, this brightness comes at the price of a too-cool color temperature and we noted a blue cast in the picture—in general, its factory calibration isn't particularly good. We were able to significantly improve this with our own calibration (our profile is available to download for free on the right), but this also reduces its maximum brightness by around 50 cd/m². The display fully covers the sRGB color space.

518
cd/m²
519
cd/m²
533
cd/m²
504
cd/m²
524
cd/m²
509
cd/m²
501
cd/m²
498
cd/m²
519
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
PN8007QB1-2 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 533 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 513.9 cd/m² Minimum: 12.2 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 524 cd/m²
Contrast: 1588:1 (Black: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.88, calibrated: 1.3
ΔE Greyscale 5.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
72.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
71.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.22
MSI Claw 8 AI+
PN8007QB1-2, IPS, 1920x1200, 8", 120 Hz
Lenovo Legion Go S
LEN91C1, IPS-Grade, 1920x1200, 8", 120 Hz
GPD Pocket 4
YHB03P24, IPS, 2560x1600, 8.8", 144 Hz
Asus ROG Ally X
TL070FVXS01-0, IPS, 1920x1080, 7", 120 Hz
MSI Claw
TL070FVXS02-0, IPS, 1920x1080, 7", 120 Hz
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
ANX7530 U, OLED, 1280x800, 7.4", 90 Hz
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
FLQ8423-24L0, IPS, 2560x1600, 8.4", 60 Hz
Display
-2%
18%
-6%
-5%
25%
14%
Display P3 Coverage
71.1
69.71
-2%
92.7
30%
66.2
-7%
67
-6%
99.6
40%
91.9
29%
sRGB Coverage
98.5
99.02
1%
99.6
1%
93.4
-5%
94.4
-4%
100
2%
99.3
1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
72.9
70.34
-4%
90
23%
68.5
-6%
69.4
-5%
96.1
32%
81.6
12%
Response Times
-36%
-17%
61%
59%
51%
-31%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
23.7 ?(11, 12.7)
30.8 ?(14.6, 16.2)
-30%
27.9 ?(13.4, 14.5)
-18%
9.7 ?(4.4, 5.3)
59%
9.2 ?(4.6, 4.6)
61%
9 ?(4.5, 4.5)
62%
25.5 ?(11.5, 25)
-8%
Response Time Black / White *
14.9 ?(7.8, 7.1)
21.2 ?(11.4, 9.8)
-42%
17.2 ?(8.3, 8.9)
-15%
5.7 ?(2.5, 3.2)
62%
6.6 ?(3.1, 3.5)
56%
9 ?(4.5, 4.5)
40%
22.73 ?(11.05, 11.67)
-53%
PWM Frequency
360 ?(100)
Screen
-42%
-9%
-1%
4%
143%
-4%
Brightness middle
524
538.8
3%
511.2
-2%
484
-8%
477
-9%
485
-7%
318
-39%
Brightness
514
509
-1%
524
2%
456
-11%
461
-10%
482
-6%
287
-44%
Brightness Distribution
93
93
0%
84
-10%
88
-5%
88
-5%
98
5%
48
-48%
Black Level *
0.33
0.46
-39%
0.4
-21%
0.35
-6%
0.32
3%
0.03
91%
0.1118
66%
Contrast
1588
1171
-26%
1278
-20%
1383
-13%
1491
-6%
16167
918%
2844
79%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.5
7.2
-106%
4.54
-30%
2.9
17%
2.6
26%
2
43%
4.81
-37%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
7.3
12.5
-71%
8.96
-23%
7.1
3%
5.8
21%
5
32%
6.93
5%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.3
2.3
-77%
0.95
27%
1.4
-8%
1.5
-15%
1.53
-18%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
5.9
9.5
-61%
6.4
-8%
4.5
24%
3.9
34%
2
66%
6.12
-4%
Gamma
2.22 99%
2.44 90%
2.26 97%
2.24 98%
2.17 101%
2 110%
2.003 110%
CCT
7852 83%
9485 69%
8125 80%
7534 86%
7250 90%
6336 103%
7707 84%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-27% / -33%
-3% / -5%
18% / 7%
19% / 10%
73% / 101%
-7% / -4%

* ... smaller is better

CalMAN grayscale
CalMAN grayscale
CalMAN saturation
CalMAN saturation
CalMAN ColorChecker
CalMAN ColorChecker
CalMAN grayscale calibrated
CalMAN grayscale calibrated
CalMAN saturation calibrated
CalMAN saturation calibrated
CalMAN ColorChecker calibrated
CalMAN ColorChecker calibrated
vs. sRGB
vs. sRGB
vs. P3
vs. P3
vs. AdobeRGB
vs. AdobeRGB

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
14.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7.8 ms rise
↘ 7.1 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 33 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.8 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
23.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 11 ms rise
↘ 12.7 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 31 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.6 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8553 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

In the blazing sun, the handheld struggles as a result of its reflective touchscreen, but this is no surprise. There are no problems with its viewing angle stability.

Viewing angle stability
Viewing angle stability

Performance - Lunar Lake with 32 GB RAM

 
 
 

Testing conditions

The Claw 8 features three different energy profiles (endurance, AI engine, manual), with AI engine being selected by default. Depending on the usage, the device is supposed to automatically select the optimum power parameters, but during our test, it simply remained at 17 watts. To get the highest possible gaming performance, you have to use manual mode, where you can then choose between TDP limits of 8, 17 and 30 watts (but only in the M Center app, not the quick menu). We carried out the following benchmarks and measurements in manual mode and 30 watts.

Energy profiles
Energy profiles
Adjusting the fan curves
Adjusting the fan curves

Processor - Core Ultra 7 258V

The Core Ultra 7 258V from Intel's Lunar Lake generation has 8 cores and can consume a maximum of 37/30 watts in the MSI Claw. Lunar Lake chips' multi-core performance is weaker than the old Meteor Lake chips and AMD CPUs due to their lower number of cores, but their single-core performance is better than before. Even if you use the Claw 8 AI+ as a normal PC, its performance is perfectly adequate for most everyday tasks. The loss of performance under constant load is minimal and we noted no further reduction in battery operation.

Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test

0125250375500625750875100011251250137515001625175018752000212522502375Tooltip
MSI Claw 8 AI+ Intel Core Ultra 7 258V: Ø1491 (1472.1-1573.87)
Lenovo Legion Go S AMD Ryzen Z2 Go: Ø852 (844.29-855.16)
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370: Ø2402 (2245.42-2499.38)
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme: Ø2187 (2041.02-2336.18)
MSI Claw Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø1922 (1902.14-1950.08)
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840U: Ø2092 (2081.49-2100.51)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
GPD Pocket 4
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
91.2 pt
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
82.8 pt
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
75.9 pt
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
72.8 pt
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
72.6 pt
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
 
72.1 pt
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
 
71.3 pt
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED -6!
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU
39.7 pt
Lenovo Legion Go S
AMD Ryzen Z2 Go
34.7 pt
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
GPD Pocket 4
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
16546 (14363.5min - 16546.4max) Points +56%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
15120 Points +43%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
14463 Points +36%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
13224 Points +25%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (3984 - 16841, n=16, last 2 years)
12209 Points +15%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
10599 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
  (9114 - 11097, n=12)
10474 Points -1%
Lenovo Legion Go S
AMD Ryzen Z2 Go
5778 Points -45%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU
3984 Points -62%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
GPD Pocket 4
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
2006 Points +10%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
  (1664 - 1947, n=12)
1851 Points +1%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
1825 Points
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1770 Points -3%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
1733 Points -5%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
1731 Points -5%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (1088 - 2006, n=15, last 2 years)
1686 Points -8%
Lenovo Legion Go S
AMD Ryzen Z2 Go
1281 Points -30%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
GPD Pocket 4
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
6449 Points +58%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
5794 Points +42%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
5168 Points +26%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
4805 Points +17%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (1521 - 6577, n=14, last 2 years)
4706 Points +15%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
4092 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
  (3530 - 4314, n=12)
4070 Points -1%
Lenovo Legion Go S
AMD Ryzen Z2 Go
2051 Points -50%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU
1521 Points -63%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
GPD Pocket 4
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
787 Points +11%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
711 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
  (643 - 749, n=12)
707 Points -1%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
684 Points -4%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
676 Points -5%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
672 Points -5%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (357 - 787, n=14, last 2 years)
627 Points -12%
Lenovo Legion Go S
AMD Ryzen Z2 Go
390 Points -45%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU
357 Points -50%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
GPD Pocket 4
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
2499 (2245.42min - 2499.38max) Points +59%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
2336 (2041.02min - 2336.18max) Points +48%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
2101 (2081.49min - 2100.51max) Points +33%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1950 (1902.14min - 1950.08max) Points +24%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (689 - 2533, n=14, last 2 years)
1889 Points +20%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
  (1550 - 1656, n=12)
1606 Points +2%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
1574 (1472.1min - 1573.87max) Points
Lenovo Legion Go S
AMD Ryzen Z2 Go
855 (844.29min - 855.16max) Points -46%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU
689 Points -56%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
GPD Pocket 4
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
304 Points +7%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
285 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
  (258 - 298, n=12)
284 Points 0%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
264 Points -7%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
262 Points -8%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
256 Points -10%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (155.1 - 304, n=13, last 2 years)
255 Points -11%
Lenovo Legion Go S
AMD Ryzen Z2 Go
155.1 Points -46%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Lenovo Legion Go S
AMD Ryzen Z2 Go
588 Seconds * -76%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
  (315 - 414, n=12)
347 Seconds * -4%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
334 Seconds *
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (189 - 588, n=12, last 2 years)
276 Seconds * +17%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
246 Seconds * +26%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
241 Seconds * +28%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
214 Seconds * +36%
GPD Pocket 4
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
192 Seconds * +43%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
GPD Pocket 4
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
66618 MIPS +87%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
64454 MIPS +81%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
56268 MIPS +58%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
53599 MIPS +50%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (19684 - 66618, n=14, last 2 years)
50981 MIPS +43%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
35705 MIPS
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
  (32198 - 36724, n=12)
35571 MIPS 0%
Lenovo Legion Go S
AMD Ryzen Z2 Go
23583 MIPS -34%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU
19684 MIPS -45%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
GPD Pocket 4
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
6143 MIPS +8%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
6077 MIPS +7%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
  (5547 - 5869, n=12)
5735 MIPS +1%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
5682 MIPS 0%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
5662 MIPS
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (3653 - 6143, n=13, last 2 years)
5353 MIPS -5%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
5318 MIPS -6%
Lenovo Legion Go S
AMD Ryzen Z2 Go
3675 MIPS -35%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU
3653 MIPS -35%
Geekbench 6.4 / Multi-Core
GPD Pocket 4
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
13426 Points +23%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
12026 Points +10%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
  (10730 - 11334, n=12)
11029 Points +1%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
10899 Points
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
10464 Points -4%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (4587 - 13426, n=15, last 2 years)
9494 Points -13%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
7427 Points -32%
Lenovo Legion Go S
AMD Ryzen Z2 Go
4966 Points -54%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU
4587 Points -58%
Geekbench 6.4 / Single-Core
GPD Pocket 4
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
2904 Points +7%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
  (2673 - 2795, n=12)
2745 Points +1%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
2716 Points
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
2550 Points -6%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2433 Points -10%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (1348 - 2904, n=15, last 2 years)
2308 Points -15%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
2243 Points -17%
Lenovo Legion Go S
AMD Ryzen Z2 Go
1400 Points -48%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU
1348 Points -50%
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
GPD Pocket 4
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
11975 Points +27%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
10713 Points +13%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
10076 Points +7%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
  (9330 - 9864, n=12)
9619 Points +2%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
9439 Points
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (3932 - 11975, n=15, last 2 years)
8773 Points -7%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
7743 Points -18%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU
4457 Points -53%
Lenovo Legion Go S
AMD Ryzen Z2 Go
3932 Points -58%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
GPD Pocket 4
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
2134 Points +8%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
  (1943 - 2046, n=12)
2000 Points +2%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
1969 Points
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
1917 Points -3%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1780 Points -10%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (875 - 2134, n=15, last 2 years)
1711 Points -13%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
1622 Points -18%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU
1486 Points -25%
Lenovo Legion Go S
AMD Ryzen Z2 Go
875 Points -56%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
GPD Pocket 4
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
20.3 fps +55%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
18.7 fps +43%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
15.8 fps +21%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (7.07 - 20.8, n=13, last 2 years)
15.6 fps +19%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
14.7 fps +12%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
13.1 fps
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
  (10.5 - 14.2, n=12)
12.7 fps -3%
Lenovo Legion Go S
AMD Ryzen Z2 Go
7.07 fps -46%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Lenovo Legion Go S
AMD Ryzen Z2 Go
92.8 s * -126%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
57.8 s * -41%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (41.1 - 92.8, n=13, last 2 years)
55.2 s * -34%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
51.4 s * -25%
GPD Pocket 4
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
49.7 s * -21%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
  (41.1 - 59.3, n=12)
49.3 s * -20%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
46.2 s * -12%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
41.1 s *
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Lenovo Legion Go S
AMD Ryzen Z2 Go
0.756 sec * -68%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (0.4167 - 0.756, n=14, last 2 years)
0.507 sec * -13%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
0.4795 sec * -7%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
0.4665 sec * -4%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
0.4601 sec * -2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
  (0.4457 - 0.4715, n=12)
0.4547 sec * -1%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
0.4492 sec *
GPD Pocket 4
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
0.4167 sec * +7%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1574 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
167.1 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
285 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
711 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
4092 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
10599 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
1825 Points
Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
120 Points
Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
590 Points
Help
Performance Rating
GPD Pocket 4
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M
89.4 pt
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
89.4 pt
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
84.3 pt
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
 
74.9 pt
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
57.1 pt
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V
53 pt
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
 
51.5 pt
Lenovo Legion Go S
AMD Ryzen Z2 Go, Radeon 680M
32.6 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
GPD Pocket 4
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M
25805 KRay/s +111%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
24519 KRay/s +101%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
21814 KRay/s +78%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (6990 - 26450, n=14, last 2 years)
19628 KRay/s +61%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V
12224 KRay/s
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
  (9215 - 12781, n=12)
11647 KRay/s -5%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
10795 KRay/s -12%
Lenovo Legion Go S
AMD Ryzen Z2 Go, Radeon 680M
6990 KRay/s -43%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
103637 Points +69%
GPD Pocket 4
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M
95655 Points +56%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
91595 Points +50%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (42932 - 109745, n=14, last 2 years)
83162 Points +36%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V
61266 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
  (48758 - 63401, n=12)
58797 Points -4%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
58068 Points -5%
Lenovo Legion Go S
AMD Ryzen Z2 Go, Radeon 680M
42932 Points -30%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
GPD Pocket 4
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M
4475 MB/s +66%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
4465 MB/s +66%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
4211 MB/s +56%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (1403 - 4847, n=14, last 2 years)
3727 MB/s +38%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
2707 MB/s 0%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V
2696 MB/s
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
  (2271 - 2817, n=12)
2639 MB/s -2%
Lenovo Legion Go S
AMD Ryzen Z2 Go, Radeon 680M
1403 MB/s -48%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
107867 Points +117%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
99496 Points +100%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (41744 - 114294, n=14, last 2 years)
83118 Points +67%
GPD Pocket 4
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M
80927 Points +63%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
69419 Points +40%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V
49750 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
  (49510 - 49818, n=12)
49704 Points 0%
Lenovo Legion Go S
AMD Ryzen Z2 Go, Radeon 680M
45741 Points -8%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
GPD Pocket 4
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M
16640 Points +276%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
14281 Points +223%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
13607 Points +208%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (4425 - 16980, n=14, last 2 years)
11996 Points +171%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
8463 Points +91%
Lenovo Legion Go S
AMD Ryzen Z2 Go, Radeon 680M
5002 Points +13%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V
4425 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
  (4103 - 4440, n=12)
4389 Points -1%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
55457 Points +70%
GPD Pocket 4
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M
50357 Points +55%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
48428 Points +49%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (23738 - 58482, n=14, last 2 years)
44053 Points +35%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V
32540 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
  (25361 - 33565, n=12)
30888 Points -5%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
28245 Points -13%
Lenovo Legion Go S
AMD Ryzen Z2 Go, Radeon 680M
23738 Points -27%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
149047 MB/s +288%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (21547 - 166333, n=14, last 2 years)
88880 MB/s +131%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
80158 MB/s +108%
GPD Pocket 4
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M
69125 MB/s +80%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
59882 MB/s +56%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
  (37728 - 40753, n=12)
39056 MB/s +2%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V
38453 MB/s
Lenovo Legion Go S
AMD Ryzen Z2 Go, Radeon 680M
21547 MB/s -44%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
GPD Pocket 4
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M
1077 MB/s +75%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
987 MB/s +60%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
899 MB/s +46%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (356 - 1112, n=14, last 2 years)
831 MB/s +35%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
796 MB/s +29%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V
616 MB/s
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
  (499 - 632, n=12)
599 MB/s -3%
Lenovo Legion Go S
AMD Ryzen Z2 Go, Radeon 680M
356 MB/s -42%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
GPD Pocket 4
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M
13665 KRay/s +103%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
13049 KRay/s +94%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
11335 KRay/s +68%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (3766 - 14181, n=14, last 2 years)
10374 KRay/s +54%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V
6728 KRay/s
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
  (4891 - 6930, n=12)
6263 KRay/s -7%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
5732 KRay/s -15%
Lenovo Legion Go S
AMD Ryzen Z2 Go, Radeon 680M
3766 KRay/s -44%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V
54726 MPixel/s
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
  (51323 - 54971, n=12)
53755 MPixel/s -2%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
49287 MPixel/s -10%
GPD Pocket 4
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M
49112 MPixel/s -10%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
39932 MPixel/s -27%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (19472 - 54726, n=14, last 2 years)
37306 MPixel/s -32%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
26622 MPixel/s -51%
Lenovo Legion Go S
AMD Ryzen Z2 Go, Radeon 680M
19472 MPixel/s -64%

System performance

Thanks to its modern components, the Claw 8 AI+ is a very responsive device and we had no stability problems during our test.

PCMark 10 / Score
GPD Pocket 4
Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
7471 Points +2%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
7314 Points
Asus ROG Ally X
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
7149 Points -2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V
  (6265 - 7314, n=12)
6908 Points -6%
MSI Claw
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
6504 Points -11%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (5219 - 7471, n=14, last 2 years)
6448 Points -12%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U
5900 Points -19%
Lenovo Legion Go S
Radeon 680M, Z2 Go, SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N
5219 Points -29%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
GPD Pocket 4
Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
11262 Points +1%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
11110 Points
Asus ROG Ally X
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
10633 Points -4%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V
  (9295 - 11467, n=12)
10313 Points -7%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (8427 - 11262, n=14, last 2 years)
9887 Points -11%
MSI Claw
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
9610 Points -14%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U
9247 Points -17%
Lenovo Legion Go S
Radeon 680M, Z2 Go, SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N
8427 Points -24%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
GPD Pocket 4
Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
10031 Points +5%
Asus ROG Ally X
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
9912 Points +4%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
9535 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V
  (7357 - 9619, n=12)
8824 Points -7%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (7213 - 10031, n=14, last 2 years)
8649 Points -9%
MSI Claw
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
8346 Points -12%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U
7323 Points -23%
Lenovo Legion Go S
Radeon 680M, Z2 Go, SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N
7213 Points -24%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
10026 Points
GPD Pocket 4
Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
10017 Points 0%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V
  (9724 - 10026, n=12)
9849 Points -2%
Asus ROG Ally X
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
9408 Points -6%
MSI Claw
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
9311 Points -7%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (6350 - 10026, n=14, last 2 years)
8537 Points -15%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U
8233 Points -18%
Lenovo Legion Go S
Radeon 680M, Z2 Go, SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N
6350 Points -37%
CrossMark / Overall
GPD Pocket 4
Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
1847 Points +7%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
1731 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V
  (1623 - 1742, n=11)
1706 Points -1%
MSI Claw
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
1693 Points -2%
Asus ROG Ally X
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1693 Points -2%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (840 - 1847, n=12, last 2 years)
1467 Points -15%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U
1340 Points -23%
Lenovo Legion Go S
Radeon 680M, Z2 Go, SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N
865 Points -50%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU, Steam Deck OLED APU, Phison ESMP001TKB5C3
840 Points -51%
CrossMark / Productivity
GPD Pocket 4
Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
1719 Points +3%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
1672 Points
MSI Claw
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
1649 Points -1%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V
  (1558 - 1684, n=11)
1644 Points -2%
Asus ROG Ally X
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1639 Points -2%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (874 - 1719, n=12, last 2 years)
1453 Points -13%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U
1416 Points -15%
Lenovo Legion Go S
Radeon 680M, Z2 Go, SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N
878 Points -47%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU, Steam Deck OLED APU, Phison ESMP001TKB5C3
874 Points -48%
CrossMark / Creativity
GPD Pocket 4
Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
2077 Points +8%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V
  (1846 - 1977, n=11)
1932 Points +1%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
1919 Points
Asus ROG Ally X
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1868 Points -3%
MSI Claw
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
1795 Points -6%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (808 - 2077, n=12, last 2 years)
1543 Points -20%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U
1278 Points -33%
Lenovo Legion Go S
Radeon 680M, Z2 Go, SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N
891 Points -54%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU, Steam Deck OLED APU, Phison ESMP001TKB5C3
808 Points -58%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
GPD Pocket 4
Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
1610 Points +14%
MSI Claw
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
1538 Points +9%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
1411 Points
Asus ROG Ally X
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1392 Points -1%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V
  (1251 - 1411, n=11)
1312 Points -7%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (759 - 1610, n=12, last 2 years)
1310 Points -7%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U
1309 Points -7%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU, Steam Deck OLED APU, Phison ESMP001TKB5C3
831 Points -41%
Lenovo Legion Go S
Radeon 680M, Z2 Go, SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N
759 Points -46%
WebXPRT 3 / Overall
GPD Pocket 4
Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
323 Points +3%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
314 Points
Asus ROG Ally X
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
304 Points -3%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V
  (219 - 314, n=10)
285 Points -9%
MSI Claw
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
276 Points -12%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (188.4 - 323, n=14, last 2 years)
269 Points -14%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U
230 Points -27%
Lenovo Legion Go S
Radeon 680M, Z2 Go, SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N
225.6 Points -28%
WebXPRT 4 / Overall
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
291 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V
  (207 - 291, n=12)
272 Points -7%
GPD Pocket 4
Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
266 Points -9%
MSI Claw
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
255 Points -12%
Asus ROG Ally X
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
248 Points -15%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (107 - 291, n=11, last 2 years)
217 Points -25%
Lenovo Legion Go S
Radeon 680M, Z2 Go, SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N
186.4 Points -36%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU, Steam Deck OLED APU, Phison ESMP001TKB5C3
107 Points -63%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
Lenovo Legion Go S
Radeon 680M, Z2 Go, SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N
895 ms * -87%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (428 - 895, n=14, last 2 years)
577 ms * -20%
Asus ROG Ally X
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
536 ms * -12%
MSI Claw
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
529 ms * -10%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U
518 ms * -8%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V
  (468 - 559, n=11)
488 ms * -2%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
479 ms *
GPD Pocket 4
Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
428 ms * +11%

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 10 Score
7314 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
  (107682 - 109035, n=12)
108390 MB/s 0%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V
107929 MB/s
GPD Pocket 4
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M
89385 MB/s -17%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
81717 MB/s -24%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
74414 MB/s -31%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (32617 - 107929, n=15, last 2 years)
65873 MB/s -39%
Lenovo Legion Go S
AMD Ryzen Z2 Go, Radeon 680M
45050 MB/s -58%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
43750 MB/s -59%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU, Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
32617 MB/s -70%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
GPD Pocket 4
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M
100208 MB/s +14%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V
87827 MB/s
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
  (82846 - 89417, n=12)
87219 MB/s -1%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
80481 MB/s -8%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (25380 - 100208, n=14, last 2 years)
58983 MB/s -33%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
58713 MB/s -33%
Lenovo Legion Go S
AMD Ryzen Z2 Go, Radeon 680M
38572 MB/s -56%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
37657 MB/s -57%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU, Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
25380 MB/s -71%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V
117883 MB/s
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
  (112837 - 117935, n=12)
117465 MB/s 0%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
106998 MB/s -9%
GPD Pocket 4
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M
98820 MB/s -16%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (25596 - 117883, n=16, last 2 years)
75790 MB/s -36%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
75350 MB/s -36%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
49797 MB/s -58%
Lenovo Legion Go S
AMD Ryzen Z2 Go, Radeon 680M
48811 MB/s -59%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU, Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
25596 MB/s -78%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
139.6 ns * -40%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
132.3 ns * -33%
Lenovo Legion Go S
AMD Ryzen Z2 Go, Radeon 680M
129.3 ns * -30%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (99.8 - 139.6, n=15, last 2 years)
123 ns * -23%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
122.1 ns * -22%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU, Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
112.6 ns * -13%
GPD Pocket 4
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M
105.5 ns * -6%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V
99.8 ns *
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
  (95 - 101.1, n=12)
97.1 ns * +3%

* ... smaller is better

DPC latencies

During our latency test, the test device with the current BIOS version showed no limitations whatsoever. One driver did fail a little, but the important interrupt-to-process latency value was very low.

LatencyMon - overview
LatencyMon - overview
LatencyMon - drivers
LatencyMon - drivers
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
MSI Claw
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
2293.5 μs * -370%
Asus ROG Ally X
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1486.6 μs * -205%
Lenovo Legion Go S
Radeon 680M, Z2 Go, SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N
1435.6 μs * -194%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U
995 μs * -104%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
487.7 μs *
GPD Pocket 4
Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
471.3 μs * +3%

* ... smaller is better

Storage device

M.2-2230 SSD
M.2-2230 SSD

MSI has installed a compact 1TB M.2-2230 SSD from Kioxia (869 GB free after first start-up), which can be replaced without any problems. The PCIe 4.0 SSD's transfer rates were very good during our test and remained completely stable.

Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 5147 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 5085 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 854 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 578 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 60.7 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 155.2 MB/s
CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 1638 MB/s
CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 2284 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 -11!
 
90.7 pt
GPD Pocket 4
 
80.3 pt
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
71.4 pt
Average Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
 
68.3 pt
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
 
66 pt
Lenovo Legion Go S
SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N
61.7 pt
Asus ROG Ally X
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
61.3 pt
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
60.4 pt
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED -11!
Phison ESMP001TKB5C3
44.4 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
Phison ESMP001TKB5C3
5565 (3733.98min - 5564.79max) MB/s +77%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
 
4421 (4398.57min - 4420.59max) MB/s +41%
GPD Pocket 4
 
3543 (3463.87min - 3542.51max) MB/s +13%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
3141 (3077.71min - 3140.5max) MB/s
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (431 - 5565, n=15, last 2 years)
2948 MB/s -6%
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
2878 (2833.46min - 2878.46max) MB/s -8%
Average Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
  (2546 - 3141, n=2)
2844 MB/s -9%
Asus ROG Ally X
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2693 (2674.18min - 2692.74max) MB/s -14%
Lenovo Legion Go S
SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N
2569 (2495.19min - 2569.22max) MB/s -18%
seq write
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
 
5102 (4976.45min - 5101.6max) MB/s +19%
GPD Pocket 4
 
4625 (3480.81min - 4624.62max) MB/s +8%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
4301 (4221.3min - 4301.05max) MB/s
Average Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
  (3047 - 4301, n=2)
3674 MB/s -15%
Lenovo Legion Go S
SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N
3185 (1268.34min - 3185.29max) MB/s -26%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (259 - 5102, n=15, last 2 years)
2922 MB/s -32%
Asus ROG Ally X
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2768 (2498.37min - 2767.74max) MB/s -36%
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
2758 (2188.17min - 2758.38max) MB/s -36%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
Phison ESMP001TKB5C3
1056 (164.42min - 1056.34max) MB/s -75%
seq q8 t1 read
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
 
7005 (6255.88min - 7004.74max) MB/s +22%
Lenovo Legion Go S
SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N
6440 (5527.73min - 6439.51max) MB/s +12%
GPD Pocket 4
 
6355 (5605.9min - 6355.08max) MB/s +11%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
5739 (4997.3min - 5739.33max) MB/s
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (2458 - 7005, n=15, last 2 years)
5138 MB/s -10%
Asus ROG Ally X
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
4952 (4163.75min - 4951.75max) MB/s -14%
Average Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
  (4075 - 5739, n=2)
4907 MB/s -14%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
Phison ESMP001TKB5C3
3760 (2910.85min - 3760.19max) MB/s -34%
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
2458 (2277.98min - 2458.28max) MB/s -57%
seq q8 t1 write
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
 
6151 (6074.61min - 6150.81max) MB/s +17%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
5252 (5232min - 5251.88max) MB/s
Average Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
  (4639 - 5252, n=2)
4946 MB/s -6%
GPD Pocket 4
 
4867 (4538.6min - 4867.19max) MB/s -7%
Lenovo Legion Go S
SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N
4568 (1284.66min - 4568.32max) MB/s -13%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (256 - 6151, n=15, last 2 years)
3306 MB/s -37%
Asus ROG Ally X
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
3033 (2657.93min - 3033.11max) MB/s -42%
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
2871 (2238.71min - 2871max) MB/s -45%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
Phison ESMP001TKB5C3
1088 (990.07min - 1088.21max) MB/s -79%
4k q1 t1 read
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
Phison ESMP001TKB5C3
97.4 (60.76min - 97.44max) MB/s +88%
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
68 (66.96min - 68max) MB/s +31%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
 
64.2 (61.66min - 64.21max) MB/s +24%
GPD Pocket 4
 
59 (58.74min - 58.95max) MB/s +14%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (37.3 - 97.4, n=15, last 2 years)
59 MB/s +14%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
51.9 (48.63min - 51.87max) MB/s
Average Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
  (51.5 - 51.9, n=2)
51.7 MB/s 0%
Asus ROG Ally X
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
51.5 (50.22min - 51.53max) MB/s -1%
Lenovo Legion Go S
SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N
46.1 (44.66min - 46.06max) MB/s -11%
4k q1 t1 write
GPD Pocket 4
 
227 (220.18min - 227.04max) MB/s +30%
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
226 (185.56min - 226.08max) MB/s +29%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
 
181.4 (169.88min - 181.36max) MB/s +4%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (112 - 262, n=16, last 2 years)
181.1 MB/s +4%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
174.9 (155.08min - 174.93max) MB/s
Average Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
  (161.8 - 174.9, n=2)
168.4 MB/s -4%
Asus ROG Ally X
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
140.9 (139.71min - 140.94max) MB/s -19%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
Phison ESMP001TKB5C3
112.3 (81.5min - 112.29max) MB/s -36%
Lenovo Legion Go S
SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N
112 (100.07min - 111.98max) MB/s -36%
4k q32 t16 read
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
 
4025 (4006.61min - 4024.99max) MB/s +43%
GPD Pocket 4
 
3497 (1357.47min - 3497.01max) MB/s +24%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
2811 (2783.79min - 2810.81max) MB/s
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
2148 (2142.5min - 2147.8max) MB/s -24%
Average Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
  (1091 - 2811, n=2)
1951 MB/s -31%
Lenovo Legion Go S
SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N
1893 (1813.54min - 1893.35max) MB/s -33%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (86 - 4025, n=15, last 2 years)
1875 MB/s -33%
Asus ROG Ally X
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1106 (1031.05min - 1105.71max) MB/s -61%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
Phison ESMP001TKB5C3
407 (296.91min - 406.67max) MB/s -86%
4k q32 t16 write
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
 
2452 (2245.51min - 2452.41max) MB/s +43%
GPD Pocket 4
 
1720 (1666.75min - 1720.14max) MB/s 0%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
1714 (1195.48min - 1713.63max) MB/s
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (89.1 - 3088, n=15, last 2 years)
1272 MB/s -26%
Lenovo Legion Go S
SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N
1222 (1181.65min - 1222.42max) MB/s -29%
Average Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
  (474 - 1714, n=2)
1094 MB/s -36%
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
542 (404.55min - 542.06max) MB/s -68%
Asus ROG Ally X
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
447 (437.78min - 446.91max) MB/s -74%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
Phison ESMP001TKB5C3
89.1 (82.16min - 89.09max) MB/s -95%
AS SSD
Score Total
GPD Pocket 4
 
6318 Points +18%
Average Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
  (5356 - 5371, n=2)
5364 Points 0%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
5356 Points
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (2412 - 8425, n=11, last 2 years)
5339 Points 0%
Lenovo Legion Go S
SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N
4941 Points -8%
Asus ROG Ally X
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
4711 Points -12%
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
4480 Points -16%
Score Read
GPD Pocket 4
 
2849 Points +27%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
2252 Points
Lenovo Legion Go S
SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N
2231 Points -1%
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
2189 Points -3%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (842 - 2849, n=11, last 2 years)
2065 Points -8%
Average Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
  (1512 - 2252, n=2)
1882 Points -16%
Asus ROG Ally X
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1315 Points -42%
Score Write
Asus ROG Ally X
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2787 Points +41%
Average Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
  (1976 - 3160, n=2)
2568 Points +30%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (1161 - 4632, n=11, last 2 years)
2165 Points +10%
GPD Pocket 4
 
2054 Points +4%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
1976 Points
Lenovo Legion Go S
SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N
1704 Points -14%
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
1225 Points -38%
Seq Read
GPD Pocket 4
 
5293.31 MB/s +8%
Lenovo Legion Go S
SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N
5107.56 MB/s +4%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
4909 MB/s
Average Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
  (4885 - 4909, n=2)
4897 MB/s 0%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (193.2 - 5643, n=12, last 2 years)
3832 MB/s -22%
Asus ROG Ally X
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
3524 MB/s -28%
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
2601 MB/s -47%
Seq Write
GPD Pocket 4
 
4532.38 MB/s +1%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
4479 MB/s
Average Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
  (3225 - 4479, n=2)
3852 MB/s -14%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (80.9 - 5416, n=12, last 2 years)
3020 MB/s -33%
Lenovo Legion Go S
SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N
2264.42 MB/s -49%
Asus ROG Ally X
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2084 MB/s -53%
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
1397 MB/s -69%
4K Read
Lenovo Legion Go S
SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N
66.86 MB/s +45%
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
64.6 MB/s +40%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (34 - 82.8, n=11, last 2 years)
58.9 MB/s +28%
GPD Pocket 4
 
58.86 MB/s +28%
Average Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
  (46.1 - 50.7, n=2)
48.4 MB/s +5%
Asus ROG Ally X
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
47.5 MB/s +3%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
46.1 MB/s
4K Write
GPD Pocket 4
 
200.12 MB/s +48%
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
200 MB/s +48%
Average Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
  (135.5 - 202, n=2)
168.8 MB/s +25%
Asus ROG Ally X
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
167.9 MB/s +24%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (90.7 - 218, n=11, last 2 years)
158.4 MB/s +17%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
135.5 MB/s
Lenovo Legion Go S
SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N
106.87 MB/s -21%
4K-64 Read
GPD Pocket 4
 
2260.35 MB/s +32%
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
1864 MB/s +9%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
1715 MB/s
Lenovo Legion Go S
SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N
1653.06 MB/s -4%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (590 - 2260, n=11, last 2 years)
1590 MB/s -7%
Average Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
  (973 - 1715, n=2)
1344 MB/s -22%
Asus ROG Ally X
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
915 MB/s -47%
4K-64 Write
Asus ROG Ally X
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2411 MB/s +73%
Average Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
  (1392 - 2636, n=2)
2014 MB/s +45%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (885 - 3957, n=11, last 2 years)
1768 MB/s +27%
GPD Pocket 4
 
1400.18 MB/s +1%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
1392 MB/s
Lenovo Legion Go S
SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N
1370.24 MB/s -2%
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
885 MB/s -36%
Access Time Read
Lenovo Legion Go S
SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N
0.142 ms * -468%
GPD Pocket 4
 
0.082 ms * -228%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (0.025 - 0.151, n=11, last 2 years)
0.082 ms * -228%
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
0.068 ms * -172%
Asus ROG Ally X
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
0.03 ms * -20%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
0.025 ms *
Average Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
  (0.024 - 0.025, n=2)
0.0245 ms * +2%
Access Time Write
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
0.084 ms *
Average Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
  (0.082 - 0.084, n=2)
0.083 ms * +1%
GPD Pocket 4
 
0.065 ms * +23%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (0.016 - 0.084, n=11, last 2 years)
0.04055 ms * +52%
Lenovo Legion Go S
SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N
0.037 ms * +56%
Asus ROG Ally X
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
0.022 ms * +74%
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
0.021 ms * +75%

* ... smaller is better

Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

02955908851180147517702065236026552950324535403835413044254720501553105605Tooltip
MSI Claw 8 AI+; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø5845 (5515.38-5873.91)

Graphics card

The Intel Arc Graphics 140V's graphics performance is very good, with the Claw 8 coming in at the top of our comparison group in the synthetic benchmarks. However, gaming performance is of course more important and the Lunar Lake processor also performed very well in this respect. During our standard tests, the Claw 8 was only beaten by the significantly more expensive GDP Pocket, but the old Claw was outperformed by 25% and the ROG Ally X by around 10%. During our tests, GTA V kept crashing at startup, which is why we cannot provide any results here. Apart from that, however, there were no problems. Its gaming performance remains completely stable, both during longer sessions and on battery power.

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Intel Arc Graphics 140V, Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
93.9 pt
Average Intel Arc Graphics 140V
 
90.4 pt
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
88.5 pt
GPD Pocket 4
AMD Radeon 890M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
87.1 pt
MSI Claw
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
86.5 pt
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
 
80.4 pt
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
78.9 pt
Lenovo Legion Go S -1!
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen Z2 Go
58 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
13828 Points +22%
GPD Pocket 4
AMD Radeon 890M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
13267 Points +17%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (10150 - 13828, n=12, last 2 years)
12210 Points +8%
MSI Claw
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
12205 Points +8%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
12043 Points +6%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Intel Arc Graphics 140V, Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
11316 Points
Average Intel Arc Graphics 140V
  (10499 - 11752, n=15)
11111 Points -2%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Intel Arc Graphics 140V, Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
9971 Points
Average Intel Arc Graphics 140V
  (6790 - 10006, n=17)
9490 Points -5%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
8775 Points -12%
MSI Claw
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
8618 Points -14%
GPD Pocket 4
AMD Radeon 890M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
8540 Points -14%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (6580 - 9971, n=16, last 2 years)
8077 Points -19%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
7971 Points -20%
Lenovo Legion Go S
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen Z2 Go
6580 Points -34%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Intel Arc Graphics 140V, Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
4118 Points
Average Intel Arc Graphics 140V
  (2955 - 4227, n=20)
3938 Points -4%
MSI Claw
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
3491 Points -15%
GPD Pocket 4
AMD Radeon 890M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
3286 Points -20%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
3196 Points -22%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (2058 - 4118, n=16, last 2 years)
2957 Points -28%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
2866 Points -30%
Lenovo Legion Go S
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen Z2 Go
2058 Points -50%
3DMark 11 Performance
11827 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
9075 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
4448 points
3DMark Steel Nomad Score
812 points
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score
3289 points
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
3267 points
Help
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU
Lenovo Legion Go S
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen Z2 Go
980 Seconds * -79%
Average Intel Arc Graphics 140V
  (509 - 700, n=15)
581 Seconds * -6%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Intel Arc Graphics 140V, Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
546 Seconds *
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (290 - 980, n=14, last 2 years)
448 Seconds * +18%
MSI Claw
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
437 Seconds * +20%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
385 Seconds * +29%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
365 Seconds * +33%
GPD Pocket 4
AMD Radeon 890M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
304 Seconds * +44%
Blender / v3.3 Classroom HIP/AMD
Lenovo Legion Go S
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen Z2 Go
327 Seconds *
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (n=1last 2 years)
327 Seconds *

* ... smaller is better

Performance Rating - Percent
GPD Pocket 4
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M
98 pt
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V
93.2 pt
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
83.9 pt
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
 
75.4 pt
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
74.5 pt
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 -2!
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
73.7 pt
Lenovo Legion Go S
AMD Ryzen Z2 Go, AMD Radeon 680M
59 pt
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED -4!
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU, AMD Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
53.5 pt
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V
28.5 (23.4min) fps
GPD Pocket 4
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M
26.6 (22.1min) fps -7%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
22.9 (19.3min) fps -20%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (11.5 - 28.5, n=12, last 2 years)
20.5 fps -28%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
19.8 (16.6min) fps -31%
Lenovo Legion Go S
AMD Ryzen Z2 Go, AMD Radeon 680M
13.8 (11.7min, 10.2P1) fps -52%
Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset
GPD Pocket 4
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M
29.1 fps +1%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V
28.7 fps
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
25.8 fps -10%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (13.5 - 29.1, n=14, last 2 years)
23 fps -20%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
20.3 fps -29%
Lenovo Legion Go S
AMD Ryzen Z2 Go, AMD Radeon 680M
18.1 fps -37%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V
34.4 fps
GPD Pocket 4
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M
32.5 fps -6%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
30 fps -13%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
28.3 fps -18%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (18.4 - 34.4, n=17, last 2 years)
26.8 fps -22%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
25.4 fps -26%
Lenovo Legion Go S
AMD Ryzen Z2 Go, AMD Radeon 680M
19.9 fps -42%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU, AMD Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
18.4 fps -47%
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V
56.1 (18min, 29.5P1) fps
GPD Pocket 4
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M
56.1 (42.7min, 45.4P1) fps 0%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
51.6 (35.6min, 40.1P1) fps -8%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
48.6 (29.1min, 38.3P1) fps -13%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
46 fps -18%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (30 - 56.1, n=17, last 2 years)
46 fps -18%
Lenovo Legion Go S
AMD Ryzen Z2 Go, AMD Radeon 680M
35.9 (10min, 11.8P1) fps -36%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU, AMD Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
30 fps -47%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
GPD Pocket 4
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M
85 (75.3min) fps +3%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V
82.2 (57.3min) fps
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
76.2 (68.4min) fps -7%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (30.8 - 85, n=17, last 2 years)
65.9 fps -20%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
63.6 (41.1min) fps -23%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
60.4 (54.6min) fps -27%
Lenovo Legion Go S
AMD Ryzen Z2 Go, AMD Radeon 680M
58.7 (50.9min) fps -29%
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
GPD Pocket 4
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M
50.5 fps +57%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
38.9 fps +21%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
33.2 fps +3%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (24.5 - 50.5, n=17, last 2 years)
32.4 fps +1%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V
32.2 fps
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
27.6 fps -14%
Lenovo Legion Go S
AMD Ryzen Z2 Go, AMD Radeon 680M
26.5 fps -18%

Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS diagram

0510152025Tooltip
MSI Claw 8 AI+ Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V: Ø25.3 (23.7-26.2)
lowmed.highultra
GTA V (2015) 0 game wont start
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 100.7 94 84.1 82.2
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 87.6 87.6 34.4
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 43.3 36.5 32.2
Strange Brigade (2018) 227 81.7 67.9 56.1
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) 40.4 33.5 29.2 28.7
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) 46.8 37.4 31.4 28.5
F1 24 (2024) 85.7 76.2 59.5 20.1
Assassin's Creed Shadows (2025) 18

Emissions & energy

Noise emissions

Two fans
Two fans

The handheld's two fans start up quite quickly, especially in the most powerful mode, but their fluctuating behavior during gaming is more of an issue. In manual mode at 30 watts, the device's noise emissions vary between 37.3-41.4 dB(A), although its TDP remains absolutely constant. We also observed this behavior in AI mode (37/17 watts), but in the range of 33.4-37.3 dB(A). There were no other electronic noises coming from our test device during our test.

Noise Level

Idle
24.7 / 24.7 / 28.9 dB(A)
Load
37.3 / 41.4 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 24.7 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2044.740.646.341.940.42532.133.333.329.933.23129.628.231.428.929.64037.332.939.836.938.4503228.833.331.333.16328.227.927.926.336.78021.822.322.82626.110024.520.621.623.322.812524.121.419.3202416020.419.918.417.423.220022.220.419.318.523.625023.922.42220.525.631524.120.619.6162640023.920.616.913.526.950025.621.618.912.229.863027.623.91811.429.880027.323.819.410.934100027.523.518.610.931.1125028.424.218.711.632.2160029.126.420.911.132.7200027.923.314.511.530.8250023.817.513.41230.8315022.317.313.612.227.8400019.615.213.112.624.150001814.31312.723.2630015.613.813.212.819.6800014.113.513.212.816.1100001413.813.21314.71250013.913.813.212.914.21600013.813.812.712.313SPL37.333.428.924.741.4N2.41.71.10.63.5median 23.9median 20.6median 18median 12.7median 25.6Delta5.34.53.62.45.4hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseMSI Claw 8 AI+
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
Lenovo Legion Go S
Radeon 680M, Z2 Go, SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N
GPD Pocket 4
Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
Asus ROG Ally X
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
MSI Claw
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU, Steam Deck OLED APU, Phison ESMP001TKB5C3
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U
Noise
-5%
-7%
-3%
-9%
5%
1%
off / environment *
24.7
25.6
-4%
22.8
8%
24.7
-0%
25.7
-4%
24.7
-0%
24.4
1%
Idle Minimum *
24.7
25.6
-4%
25.8
-4%
24.7
-0%
25.7
-4%
25
-1%
24.4
1%
Idle Average *
24.7
25.6
-4%
25.8
-4%
24.7
-0%
31.7
-28%
25
-1%
24.4
1%
Idle Maximum *
28.9
28.37
2%
31
-7%
28.5
1%
31.7
-10%
25
13%
30.6
-6%
Load Average *
37.3
47
-26%
42.6
-14%
36.6
2%
31.3
16%
36
3%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *
41.4
43.1
-4%
43.3
-5%
42.6
-3%
45.5
-10%
Load Maximum *
41.4
48.5
-17%
45.1
-9%
42.6
-3%
45.5
-10%
40.8
1%
39.3
5%

* ... smaller is better

Temperature

Its surface temperatures are very low overall and the handheld's handles in particular hardly heat up. Warm air is dissipated at the top of the device. The respective TDP values were kept constant during the stress test.

CPU/iGPU data stress test (red: manual/30 watts, green: AI engine)
CPU/iGPU data stress test (red: manual/30 watts, green: AI engine)
Max. Load
 36.6 °C
98 F
35 °C
95 F
34.7 °C
94 F
 
 35.7 °C
96 F
34.9 °C
95 F
34.6 °C
94 F
 
 35 °C
95 F
35.3 °C
96 F
33.6 °C
92 F
 
Maximum: 36.6 °C = 98 F
Average: 35 °C = 95 F
29.5 °C
85 F
34.8 °C
95 F
28.4 °C
83 F
28.7 °C
84 F
34.5 °C
94 F
28.7 °C
84 F
28.3 °C
83 F
30.4 °C
87 F
29.2 °C
85 F
Maximum: 34.8 °C = 95 F
Average: 30.3 °C = 87 F
Power Supply (max.)  44.6 °C = 112 F | Room Temperature 20.8 °C = 69 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 31.6 °C / 89 F for the devices in the class Handheld / UMPC.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.6 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 38.4 °C / 101 F, ranging from 26.6 to 55 °C for the class Handheld / UMPC.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.8 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 38 °C / 100 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.6 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 31.6 °C / 89 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 34.8 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 31.6 °C / 89 F for the class Handheld / UMPC.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (35.3 °C / 95.5 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 30.5 °C / 86.9 F (-4.8 °C / -8.6 F).
Surface temperatures stress test (front)
Surface temperatures stress test (front)
Surface temperatures stress test (back)
Surface temperatures stress test (back)
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V
Lenovo Legion Go S
AMD Ryzen Z2 Go, AMD Radeon 680M
GPD Pocket 4
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
Heat
-9%
1%
-8%
-14%
Maximum Upper Side *
36.6
40
-9%
33.8
8%
42.7
-17%
41.8
-14%
Maximum Bottom *
34.8
35.5
-2%
35.2
-1%
39.7
-14%
35.9
-3%
Idle Upper Side *
27.5
32.5
-18%
26.6
3%
28
-2%
31.6
-15%
Idle Bottom *
27.2
29.2
-7%
28.6
-5%
27.2
-0%
33.6
-24%

* ... smaller is better

Speakers

The device's two stereo speakers are very good and have been improved once again compared to the old MSI Claw.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2039.442.5253132.13126.930.44029.232.2502629.76329.130.48024.43610021.943.312520.749.716019.453.720018.361.32501962.731516.766.940013.468.850011.770.763011.372.180010.473.2100010.672.9125010.472.3160010.274.1200010.874.825001173.2315011.373.5400011.770.7500012.374630012.675.7800013.171.21000013.168.11250012.858.6160001248.3SPL24.285N0.666.6median 12.3median 70.7Delta3.16.247.951.543.837.341.938.73934.337.134.831.236.829.831.830.631.332.132.232.219.326.135.921.928.338.418.830.742.62135.349.61940.951.616.943.549.815.34249.813.242.262.713.25572.515.364.774.915.167.17212.663.867.113.359.167.613.959.668.813.860.964.414.456.460.214.452.356.614.748.664.614.756.770.314.662.37014.661.962.514.854.463.114.755.155.913.74880.426.672.542.90.726.3median 62.7median 14.7median 55101.29.836.834.836.837.226.937.238.622.938.636.82036.839.122.739.14120.44142.32042.343.419.543.44519.94548.814.948.852.214.952.256.415.756.46117.76167.917.367.97112.97179.214.279.279.918.179.97813.37878.313.878.376.813.276.876.81276.877.81377.882.311.682.386.912.986.979.71279.769.912.269.972.712.372.76912.46964.612.264.666.812.166.891.925.891.989.10.789.1median 72.7median 13.2median 72.78.21.88.242.438.438.731.733.733.532.130.727.327.428.627.622.63321.735.119.841.618.147.72056.222.557.81562.412.963.412.563.712.374.211.977.911.778.211.376.210.876.111.376.411.674.211.976.512.377.612.676.812.776.412.777.612.777.312.669.811.756.624.788.20.677.6median 12.6median 76.12.38.342.946.838.239.233.63633.335.430.434.127.334.122.834.123.74021.848.620.150.421.95922.262.617.866.31565.212.870.213.574.713.376.812.175.812.374.311.975.912.279.112.676.21376.213.476.913.571.713.872.813.768.313.964.213.756.41349.825.887.20.871.8median 13.5median 71.72.47.944.347.345.837.239.633.832.435.531.236.937.545.332.535.641.329.830.633.228.528.329.624.424.626.429.621.426.94320.83957.620.752.865.718.861.270.816.767.271.613.369.57013.168.269.111.9667111.866.972.112.469.271.412.368.472.21270.170.312.5707212.669.570.412.867.366.813.268.269.513.271.470.713.272.564.113.371.271.113.172.474.112.872.669.912.167.782.725.481.855.60.651.6median 70.3median 13.1median 68.26.12.6641.143.130.236.626.234.833.433.524.72924.629.618.532.813.543.71452.913.854.813.556.711.856.811.76211.868.111.472.911.676.411.379.511.278.811.675.411.775.611.975.511.972.812.47112.768.513.159.213.158.413.463.413.167.312.764.71269.324.485.80.559.7median 12median 68.10.78.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMSI Claw 8 AI+Lenovo Legion Go SGPD Pocket 4Asus ROG Ally XMSI ClawValve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
MSI Claw 8 AI+ audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 18%, worst was 23%
Compared to all devices tested
» 7% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Lenovo Legion Go S audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 61% of all tested devices in this class were better, 17% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 18%, worst was 23%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

GPD Pocket 4 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 33% of all tested devices in this class were better, 22% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 18%, worst was 23%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Asus ROG Ally X audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 17% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 18%, worst was 23%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

MSI Claw audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 17% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 18%, worst was 23%
Compared to all devices tested
» 18% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 18%, worst was 23%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 18%, worst was 23%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Power consumption

65-watt power supply
65-watt power supply

Despite its larger display, the Claw 8 is more frugal than its predecessor and the other competitors when idling. We measured a maximum consumption of 59 watts in the stress test, which then leveled off at 50 watts after about a minute. When gaming, we noted around 46 watts. The included 65-watt plug-in power supply (192 grams) is therefore sufficiently sized.

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.46 / 0.48 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 3.2 / 6.3 / 6.6 Watt
Load midlight 40.6 / 59.3 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V, Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02, IPS, 1920x1200, 8"
Lenovo Legion Go S
Z2 Go, Radeon 680M, SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N, IPS-Grade, 1920x1200, 8"
GPD Pocket 4
Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M, , IPS, 2560x1600, 8.8"
Asus ROG Ally X
Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00, IPS, 1920x1080, 7"
MSI Claw
Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02, IPS, 1920x1080, 7"
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
Steam Deck OLED APU, Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU, Phison ESMP001TKB5C3, OLED, 1280x800, 7.4"
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, , IPS, 2560x1600, 8.4"
Power Consumption
-41%
-28%
-19%
-60%
-1%
-42%
Idle Minimum *
3.2
5.3
-66%
6
-88%
4.3
-34%
7.8
-144%
4.5
-41%
6.66
-108%
Idle Average *
6.3
9.4
-49%
8.8
-40%
6.7
-6%
11.5
-83%
7.21
-14%
7.11
-13%
Idle Maximum *
6.6
15.5
-135%
9.2
-39%
7.5
-14%
11.8
-79%
9.66
-46%
11.7
-77%
Load Average *
40.6
53.1
-31%
48.2
-19%
53.1
-31%
22.86
44%
46.708
-15%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *
47
47.6
-1%
50.1
-7%
61.3
-30%
54.4
-16%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor *
46.7
45.4
3%
45.7
2%
53.9
-15%
Load Maximum *
59.3
57.8
3%
56.4
5%
66.8
-13%
64.6
-9%
27.8
53%
56.7
4%
Witcher 3 ultra *
53.1

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Cyberpunk / stress test

0510152025303540455055Tooltip
MSI Claw 8 AI+; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø53.2 (46.8-59.3)
MSI Claw 8 AI+; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø5.04 (4.85-5.48)
MSI Claw 8 AI+; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø47 (43.3-51.4)

Power consumption with external monitor

0510152025303540455055Tooltip
MSI Claw 8 AI+; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø51 (44.8-58)
MSI Claw 8 AI+; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø53.1 (22.1-55.1)
MSI Claw 8 AI+; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø21.3 (20.2-43.7)
MSI Claw 8 AI+; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø55.1 (53.9-55.8)
MSI Claw 8 AI+; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø38.2 (36.8-47.4)
MSI Claw 8 AI+; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø5.6 (5.39-6.75)
MSI Claw 8 AI+; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø46.7 (44.1-53.5)

Runtimes

MSI has increased the handheld's battery capacity to 80 Wh and together with its low consumption values, this results in very good runtimes. When gaming, it depends heavily on the selected energy profile: In the fastest mode, Cyberpunk ran for 01:45 hours (~25fps) during our test, whereas in AI engine mode resulted in just under 3.5 hours (~19fps).

During the normal WLAN test at 150 cd/m² (29% of our test device's maximum brightness), we measured almost 24 hours and even at full brightness, it lasted more than 16.5 hours (60 Hz in each case), which are enormous runtimes.

Battery information
Battery information
Charging process
Charging process
Battery Runtime
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra 150cd
1h 45min
WiFi Websurfing
23h 33min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness
16h 37min
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V, 80 Wh
Lenovo Legion Go S
Z2 Go, Radeon 680M, 55.5 Wh
GPD Pocket 4
Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M, 45 Wh
Asus ROG Ally X
Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M, 80 Wh
MSI Claw
Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 53 Wh
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
Steam Deck OLED APU, Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU, 50 Wh
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, 65 Wh
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
 
Battery Runtime
-33%
-74%
-8%
-48%
-60%
-54%
-59%
WiFi v1.3
1413
518
-63%
373
-74%
949
-33%
466
-67%
559
-60%
648
-54%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra 150cd
105
102
-3%
124
18%
76
-28%
Gaming
252
Witcher 3 ultra
72

Notebookcheck total rating

MSI Claw 8 AI+ - 03/06/2025 v8
Andreas Osthoff

Chassis
87 / 98 → 89%
Mechanical Inputs
71%
Pointing Device
100%
Connectivity
69 / 68 → 100%
Weight
78 / 69-83 → 67%
Battery
93%
Display
81%
Games Performance
57 / 75 → 75%
Application Performance
84 / 92 → 92%
Temperature
92%
Noise
83%
Audio
89 / 91 → 97%
Average
64%
85%
Handheld / UMPC - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
0%
Packaging
50%
Power Use
84.4%
Repairability
40%
Software Updates
22.3%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 32.8%

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Read all 2 comments / answer
static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > MSI Claw 8 AI+ review - The best gaming handheld thanks to Intel Lunar Lake?
Andreas Osthoff, 2025-03- 6 (Update: 2025-03- 6)