
Intel takes on Qualcomm: Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S2 review
Battle of the CPU manufacturers.
While the first version of the SPRCHRGD 14 relied on a processor from Qualcomm, its successor uses a model from Intel. Read our review to find out what effect this has had on its performance, emissions and battery life.Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser (translated by Daisy Dickson) Published 🇩🇪 🇹🇷 ...
Verdict - The Intel version feels more balanced than its Qualcomm counterpart
The new SPRCHRGD 14 S2 is in a hot neck-and-neck race with its predecessor, with the Intel version coming out on top overall in our opinion—although it also comes at a higher price (currently around $1,400 versus approximately $1,100). The successor to the SPRCHRGD 14 S1 not only has the Core Ultra 7 258V's more stable CPU performance in its favor, but also its iGPU's significantly higher graphics performance. According to our benchmarks, the Arc Graphics 140V sometimes calculates twice as fast as the SD X Adreno X1-85.
The Qualcomm version, on the other hand, produces lower noise emissions and benefits from longer battery life. Nevertheless, we would tend to prefer the 14 S2 as it makes a more harmonious impression overall. Still, depending on your preferences in various categories, the cheaper predecessor may also be the better choice for you.
Pros
Cons
Price and availability
Currently, this laptop isn't available to purchase in the USA. In Germany, where this test was carried out, it retails for around $1,400.
Specifications
Case
Thanks to its large metal insert, the device's case cuts a very high-quality figure and, with a few minor exceptions, features good stability. In combination with its low overall height of 17 millimeters, the result is a chic and elegant visual impression. The hinge design looks good, although the lid can only be opened by approx. 135°. The laptop's 1.4-kilogram weight is average compared to the competition and ensures comfortable transportation. The supplied USB-C power adapter (65 watts) is also quite compact and lightweight. The device's build quality is good, albeit not perfect (some transitions could be even smoother).
Connectivity
Although its case is almost identical to that of its predecessor, a great update has been made to its interfaces: Instead of one USB 4 port with DisplayPort and PowerDelivery, this model now features two. There are also two Type-A ports (1x 3.2 Gen2, 1x 3.2 Gen1), an HDMI output, an audio jack, a webcam switch and an opening for Kensington locks. Buyers still have to do without a card reader, on the other hand.
The installed Wi-Fi 7 wireless module comes from Intel (model BE201) and delivers a good (transmitting) to very good (receiving) performance.
The laptop's Full HD webcam produces images with decent sharpness, although its color accuracy could be a little better—as is often the case.
Communication
Webcam

Input devices
The SPRCHRGD 14 S2 is equipped with a keyboard suitable for everyday use with fairly short key travel. Its layout is likely to be a matter of taste given Medion's arrangement along the right edge and requires a certain amount of familiarization. White backlighting (two levels) is on board so you can use the device in dark environments.
The touchpad measures 11.5 x 7.7 cm, which is more than adequate for a 14-inch device. The mouse replacement feels nice and smooth and has powerful (almost too powerful) click areas.
Display
Its display is very similar to that of the SPRCHRGD 14 S1. Medion has once again opted for an IPS panel with 2,880 x 1,800 pixels, which guarantees a very sharp image. 120 Hz is also a plus point, although the response times we measured are pretty poor. Professional users will pay more attention to its color space coverage: Here, the 14-inch device has just under 100% sRGB and around 70% AdobeRGB or DCI-P3 to offer. Its color accuracy is already good straight out of the box, so calibration is hardly necessary apart from correcting the slight blue cast. At just over 400:1, its brightness is perfectly adequate for the odd trip outdoors. In terms of contrast (around 1,200:1), the Medion laptop doesn't show any weaknesses either—if you exclude the OLED panels of some competitors. Its viewing angles are in line with the typical IPS level.
|
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 421 cd/m²
Contrast: 1203:1 (Black: 0.35 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.59 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.85, calibrated: 1
ΔE Greyscale 2.4 | 0.09-98 Ø5.1
71.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
69.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.209
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S2 CSOT MNE007ZA3-2, IPS, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite CSOT MNE007ZA3-2, IPS, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14ILL10 LEN140WQ+, OLED, 3840x2400, 14", 120 Hz | Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 ATNA40CU09-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | Lenovo ThinkPad T14 Gen 5 21MC003QGE B140UAN02.1, IPS LED, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 3% | 22% | 23% | 5% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 69.2 | 74.4 8% | 97.7 41% | 99 43% | 74.6 8% |
sRGB Coverage | 99.5 | 99.7 0% | 100 1% | 100 1% | 100 1% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 71.2 | 71.7 1% | 87.6 23% | 89.2 25% | 76.2 7% |
Response Times | 14% | 96% | 97% | -66% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 31.2 ? | 28.4 ? 9% | 0.67 ? 98% | 0.7 ? 98% | 44 ? -41% |
Response Time Black / White * | 15.2 ? | 12.4 ? 18% | 0.93 ? 94% | 0.71 ? 95% | 28.9 ? -90% |
PWM Frequency | 120 ? | 480 ? | |||
PWM Amplitude * | 70 | 26 | |||
Screen | -12% | -45% | 20% | -1% | |
Brightness middle | 421 | 395 -6% | 371.8 -12% | 374 -11% | 474 13% |
Brightness | 407 | 387 -5% | 382 -6% | 379 -7% | 439 8% |
Brightness Distribution | 94 | 90 -4% | 95 1% | 98 4% | 89 -5% |
Black Level * | 0.35 | 0.33 6% | 0.22 37% | ||
Contrast | 1203 | 1197 0% | 2155 79% | ||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.59 | 1.86 -17% | 4.32 -172% | 1 37% | 2.2 -38% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.7 | 3.48 6% | 6.7 -81% | 2.2 41% | 4.4 -19% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1 | 1.86 -86% | 2.18 -118% | 1.6 -60% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.4 | 2.52 -5% | 0.6 75% | 1.1 54% | 3 -25% |
Gamma | 2.209 100% | 2.35 94% | 2.2 100% | 2.15 102% | 2.31 95% |
CCT | 7036 92% | 6999 93% | 6437 101% | 6549 99% | 6880 94% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 2% /
-5% | 24% /
-5% | 47% /
35% | -21% /
-9% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
15.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5.8 ms rise | |
↘ 9.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 34 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.6 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
31.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15 ms rise | |
↘ 16.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 39 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.3 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8419 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Performance
With the present configuration, the SPRCHRGD 14 S2 makes itself comfortable in the mid-range of subnotebooks. While its SSD (the 14-inch model has an M.2-2280 slot) can be replaced, its RAM can't be expanded.
Testing conditions
Interestingly, Medion doesn't use a manufacturer tool to control the laptop's operating mode, so the CPU is always set to 30 watts (PL1) and 37 watts (PL2).
Processor
The Core Ultra 7 258V is a fairly frugal model from the Lunar Lake generation (3 nm), containing four performance cores and four efficiency cores. Our benchmark course put the SPRCHRGD 14 S2 on par with other 258V-based laptops, although it couldn't reach the level of the Ryzen 7 8840U, for example. The predecessor's Qualcomm processor (Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100) really got going after a cold start, but—as could be seen very clearly from the Cinebench loop—lost a lot of performance over time, which could also be due to its cooling system.
Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 Gen 5 21MC003QGE | |
Average of class Subnotebook | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14ILL10 | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S2 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 Gen 5 21MC003QGE | |
Average of class Subnotebook (1135 - 32888, n=69, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14ILL10 | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S2 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (9215 - 12781, n=15) | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 Gen 5 21MC003QGE | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14ILL10 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (5218 - 123315, n=69, last 2 years) | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S2 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (48758 - 63401, n=15) | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 Gen 5 21MC003QGE | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite | |
Average of class Subnotebook (444 - 5287, n=69, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14ILL10 | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S2 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (2271 - 2817, n=15) | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 Gen 5 21MC003QGE | |
Average of class Subnotebook (10579 - 115682, n=69, last 2 years) | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S2 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (49510 - 49818, n=15) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14ILL10 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 Gen 5 21MC003QGE | |
Average of class Subnotebook (744 - 18418, n=69, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14ILL10 | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S2 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (4103 - 4440, n=15) | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 Gen 5 21MC003QGE | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14ILL10 | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S2 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (3341 - 65433, n=69, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (25361 - 33565, n=15) | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 Gen 5 21MC003QGE | |
Average of class Subnotebook (638 - 161430, n=69, last 2 years) | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (37728 - 40753, n=15) | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S2 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14ILL10 | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 Gen 5 21MC003QGE | |
Average of class Subnotebook (164.9 - 1379, n=69, last 2 years) | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14ILL10 | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S2 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (499 - 632, n=15) | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 Gen 5 21MC003QGE | |
Average of class Subnotebook (610 - 17495, n=69, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14ILL10 | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S2 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (4891 - 6930, n=15) | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14ILL10 | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S2 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (51323 - 54971, n=15) | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (6569 - 64588, n=69, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 Gen 5 21MC003QGE | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite |
System performance
In terms of system performance, the Intel version also showed no outliers during our test, and its results were as expected. Its fast DDR5 RAM especially deserves praise.
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (6265 - 7314, n=15) | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 Gen 5 21MC003QGE | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S2 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14ILL10 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (4993 - 7788, n=58, last 2 years) |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 Gen 5 21MC003QGE | |
Average of class Subnotebook (9363 - 11406, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (9295 - 11467, n=15) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14ILL10 | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S2 | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 Gen 5 21MC003QGE | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (7357 - 9619, n=15) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (5435 - 10623, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S2 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14ILL10 |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (9333 - 10048, n=15) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14ILL10 | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S2 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 Gen 5 21MC003QGE | |
Average of class Subnotebook (5305 - 12442, n=58, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 Gen 5 21MC003QGE | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14ILL10 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (1590 - 1742, n=14) | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (365 - 2038, n=68, last 2 years) | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 Gen 5 21MC003QGE | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14ILL10 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (1558 - 1684, n=14) | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (364 - 1918, n=68, last 2 years) | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 Gen 5 21MC003QGE | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14ILL10 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (1727 - 1977, n=14) | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (372 - 2396, n=68, last 2 years) | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 Gen 5 21MC003QGE | |
Average of class Subnotebook (312 - 1899, n=68, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14ILL10 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (1251 - 1411, n=14) | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite | |
Average of class Subnotebook (156 - 482, n=67, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14ILL10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 Gen 5 21MC003QGE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (219 - 314, n=13) | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S2 |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14ILL10 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (199.5 - 291, n=14) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (132 - 348, n=68, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 Gen 5 21MC003QGE | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S2 |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 Gen 5 21MC003QGE | |
Average of class Subnotebook (265 - 1104, n=76, last 2 years) | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S2 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (468 - 559, n=15) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14ILL10 | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 6683 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S2 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (107682 - 114336, n=15) | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14ILL10 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (14554 - 109035, n=69, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 Gen 5 21MC003QGE | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S2 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (82846 - 89417, n=15) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14ILL10 | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (15948 - 122210, n=69, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 Gen 5 21MC003QGE |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S2 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14ILL10 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (109734 - 117935, n=15) | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 Gen 5 21MC003QGE | |
Average of class Subnotebook (15709 - 117898, n=69, last 2 years) | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Average of class Subnotebook (7.2 - 187.8, n=68, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 Gen 5 21MC003QGE | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (95 - 101.1, n=15) | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S2 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14ILL10 | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite |
* ... smaller is better
DPC latencies
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S2 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14ILL10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 Gen 5 21MC003QGE |
* ... smaller is better
Storage device
Its mass storage is a bit of a mixed bag. On the one hand, the speed of the 1-TB SSD from Foresee is limited, but on the other hand, the SPRCHRGD 14 S1's performance fluctuations no longer occur (see DiskSpd loop).
* ... smaller is better
Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
Graphics card
One of the highlights of the SPRCHRGD 14 S2 is the above-average speed of its iGPU. The Arc Graphics 140V installed in the Core Ultra 7 258V outperformed the previous average value of all corresponding devices by almost 10% in the 3DMarks (the lead was slightly smaller in games). As mentioned at the beginning, the leap from the predecessor model's Adreno GPU is particularly big, so 3D and gaming enthusiasts should be much happier with the Intel version.
3DMark 11 Performance | 12746 points | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 203344 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 35866 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 9063 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 4477 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
Gaming performance
Although the Arc 140V doesn't offer enough power to handle modern or demanding games such as Stalker 2 and Indiana Jones (massive use of FSR can sometimes help), but older or less CPU-intensive titles such as Civilization 7 can sometimes be run well at medium to high settings.
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S2 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14ILL10 | |
Average Intel Arc Graphics 140V (17.5 - 30.1, n=29) | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 Gen 5 21MC003QGE | |
Average of class Subnotebook (8.48 - 31.4, n=51, last 2 years) | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S2 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14ILL10 | |
Average Intel Arc Graphics 140V (15.4 - 28.9, n=25) | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 Gen 5 21MC003QGE | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite | |
Average of class Subnotebook (7.81 - 53, n=66, last 2 years) |
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S2 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14ILL10 | |
Average Intel Arc Graphics 140V (39 - 62.5, n=25) | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (17.7 - 70.7, n=68, last 2 years) | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite |
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 161.1 | 154.2 | 69 | 28.7 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 97.5 | 76.4 | 63.9 | 86 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 97.1 | 51.3 | 37.2 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 43.6 | 34.6 | 28.5 | |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 248 | 84.8 | 72.2 | 59.9 |
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 35.7 | 30.4 | 26.2 | 25.6 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 46.5 | 38.7 | 33.4 | 29.7 |
Stalker 2 (2024) | 19 | 18.8 | 15.9 | |
Indiana Jones and the Great Circle (2024) | 23.4 | 18.3 | ||
Kingdom Come Deliverance 2 (2025) | 43.4 | 31.3 | 25.1 | |
Civilization 7 (2025) | 142.2 | 68.7 | 39.5 |
This is complemented by stable continuous performance, as our 30-minute test with Cyberpunk 2077 proved.
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS diagram
Emissions
Noise emissions
While the SPRCHRGD 14 S2 stayed nice and quiet in idle mode at 24 to 26 dB(A), the two case fans turned up the volume massively under load. 45 to 48 dB(A) not only overtook the old 14 S1, but was also the highest value in our test field. Several performance profiles would make sense here at the latest.
Noise Level
Idle |
| 24 / 25 / 26 dB(A) |
Load |
| 45 / 48 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S2 Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V | Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14ILL10 Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V | Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V | Lenovo ThinkPad T14 Gen 5 21MC003QGE R7 8840U, Radeon 780M | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 9% | 6% | 16% | 11% | |
off / environment * | 24 | 23 4% | 25.4 -6% | 23.7 1% | 23.1 4% |
Idle Minimum * | 24 | 23 4% | 26 -8% | 23.7 1% | 23.1 4% |
Idle Average * | 25 | 23 8% | 26 -4% | 23.7 5% | 23.1 8% |
Idle Maximum * | 26 | 23 12% | 26 -0% | 23.7 9% | 23.1 11% |
Load Average * | 45 | 35.8 20% | 30.5 32% | 23.1 49% | |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 48 | 40.79 15% | 35.8 25% | 31.1 35% | 47.1 2% |
Load Maximum * | 48 | 41.72 13% | 39.6 17% | 33.6 30% | 47.2 2% |
* ... smaller is better
Temperature
Its temperatures under load, on the other hand, were decent and didn't overtake the competition, reaching a maximum of 42 °C on the top and 46 °C on the bottom of the case. In idle mode, it heated up to just over 30 °C, which is neither low nor particularly high.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 39.3 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 35.8 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the class Subnotebook.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31 °C / 87.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.2 °C / 82.8 F (-2.8 °C / -5 F).
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S2 Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V | Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14ILL10 Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V | Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V | Lenovo ThinkPad T14 Gen 5 21MC003QGE R7 8840U, Radeon 780M | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -11% | 18% | 8% | -15% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 43 | 45 -5% | 34.2 20% | 43.7 -2% | 51 -19% |
Maximum Bottom * | 46 | 49 -7% | 40.6 12% | 46.9 -2% | 61.5 -34% |
Idle Upper Side * | 32 | 36 -13% | 24.8 22% | 25.8 19% | 31.3 2% |
Idle Bottom * | 31 | 37 -19% | 25.6 17% | 26.3 15% | 33.6 -8% |
* ... smaller is better
Stress test
Speakers
The laptop's sound quality is in the mid-range. It has some catching up to do—most laptops send their regards—especially when it comes to bass.
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S2 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 52% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 38% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 Gen 5 21MC003QGE audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 31% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Energy management
Power consumption
After the Lenovo Thinkpad T14 with an AMD CPU, the SPRCHRGD 14 S2 was the second most frugal laptop in our test field—at least in idle mode. 4.8 to 7.5 watts is extremely good, although its consumption shot up to 67 watts under load, which could also be said about the first version of the device. In Cyberpunk, the predecessor's Qualcomm chip consumed significantly less (54 vs. 35 watts).
Off / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Idle | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Load |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Key:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S2 Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V | Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14ILL10 Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V | Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V | Lenovo ThinkPad T14 Gen 5 21MC003QGE R7 8840U, Radeon 780M | Average of class Subnotebook | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -14% | -10% | 14% | 16% | -9% | |
Idle Minimum * | 4.8 | 6.4 -33% | 5.6 -17% | 5.1 -6% | 2.7 44% | 4.25 ? 11% |
Idle Average * | 5.4 | 9.3 -72% | 6.7 -24% | 6.2 -15% | 4.9 9% | 7.34 ? -36% |
Idle Maximum * | 7.5 | 10.7 -43% | 12.4 -65% | 6.9 8% | 5.2 31% | 9.01 ? -20% |
Load Average * | 47 | 38.1 19% | 38.7 18% | 45.6 3% | 45.4 ? 3% | |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 51.6 | 35 32% | 50.6 2% | 28.6 45% | 47.3 8% | |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 54.1 | 35 35% | 51.1 6% | 33.1 39% | 47.3 13% | |
Load Maximum * | 67 | 67 -0% | 61.5 8% | 60 10% | 66.3 1% | 68.6 ? -2% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Cyberpunk / stress test
Power consumption with external monitor
Runtimes
Intel has no chance against Qualcomm when it comes to battery life. While the 14 S1 lasted around 16 hours in our Wi-Fi test (brightness reduced to 150 cd/m²), the successor "only" managed just under 12.5 hours, putting it in penultimate place in the test field.
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S2 Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V, 65 Wh | Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, 65 Wh | Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14ILL10 Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V, 75 Wh | Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V, 72 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T14 Gen 5 21MC003QGE R7 8840U, Radeon 780M, 52.5 Wh | Average of class Subnotebook | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 30% | 28% | 16% | -17% | 4% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 740 | 964 30% | 946 28% | 858 16% | 615 -17% | 767 ? 4% |
Reader / Idle | 1401 | 1965 ? | ||||
Load | 228 | 157 | 130 | 120.9 ? | ||
H.264 | 1199 | 967 ? |
Notebookcheck total rating
The SPRCHRGD 14 S2 is an almost all-round successful 14-inch laptop that doesn't have any reason to hide behind the products of larger manufacturers—apart from its hefty noise development in 3D mode.
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S2
- 03/24/2025 v8
Florian Glaser
Possible alternatives compared
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S2 Intel Core Ultra 7 258V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140V ⎘ 32 GB Memory | List Price: 1300 EUR | 1.4 kg | 17 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI IPS | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 ⎘ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $12.99 Vaxson 2-Pack Protector Film... 2. $15.99 Vaxson 2-Pack Film Protector... 3. $18.98 Puccy 2 Pack Back Protector ... List Price: 1300 Euro | 1.4 kg | 16.9 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI IPS | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14ILL10 Intel Core Ultra 7 258V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140V ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $13.99 MUBUY-GOL 2-Pack Screen Prot... 2. $10.99 KEANBOLL (3 Pack) Designed f... 3. $10.99 i-Tensodo 2 Pack 14 inch Ant... List Price: 1900 USD | 1.2 kg | 14.55 mm | 14.00" 3840x2400 323 PPI OLED | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 Intel Core Ultra 7 258V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140V ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,029.99 ASUS Zenbook 14 OLED 2024 Bu... 2. $1,029.00 ASUS Zenbook 14 OLED Laptop,... 3. $1,699.99 ASUS Zenbook DUO Laptop, Dua... List Price: 1999€ | 1.2 kg | 13 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI OLED | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 Gen 5 21MC003QGE AMD Ryzen 7 8840U ⎘ AMD Radeon 780M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: $1,039.98 List Price: 1889 Euro | 1.5 kg | 21.5 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI IPS LED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.