Acer Swift Edge 14 AI SFE14-51
Specifications

Price comparison
Average of 5 scores (from 11 reviews)
Reviews for the Acer Swift Edge 14 AI SFE14-51
Source: Expert Reviews

The Swift Edge 14’s lightweight design and clever anti-reflective screen clearly mark it out as a machine optimised for use out and about in various environments and situations, and for that, it’s one of the very best on the market. The featherweight, but still solid and attractive, design is to be applauded and there’s not much arguing with the price when you are getting a 1TB SSD and 32GB of RAM as well. Sadly, the Swift Edge 14 has been slightly hamstrung with a subpar speaker system and webcam; for the money, both should be better than they are. If more attention had been paid to those two areas, I’d have unhesitatingly given it a Best Buy badge rather than a Recommended award.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/10/2025
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: It Pro

The Swift Edge 14 AI isn't cheap, and if you're happy with a slower but still AI-ready Snapdragon X Plus processor and a lower-resolution OLED screen, the Zenbook A14 gives you a similar form factor on a lower budget. However, the Acer has the edge on screen resolution and quality and all-round performance, and gives you much the same experience as the high-end ThinkPad for less. Lenovo's lithe laptop has its rock-solid carbon fibre/aluminium build and some additional enterprise features to recommend it, but Acer's new model is a serious alternative, especially for smaller businesses. Maybe one day all business laptops will offer so much while weighing so little.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/22/2025
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Matthew Moniz

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/24/2025
Foreign Reviews
Source: Computerhoy
ES→ENSingle Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 11/18/2025
Source: Tuexperto
ES→ENPositive: Light weight; high mobility; excellent battery life; beautiful OLED display. Negative: Relatively high price.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/30/2025
Source: Tweakers
NL→ENPositive: Ultra light weight; great OLED display; decent hardware; rich set of ports; good built quality; high security. Negative: Average performance; short battery life; high price.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/19/2025
Source: Frandroid
FR→ENSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/22/2025
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 60% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 90%
Source: Les Numeriques
FR→ENSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/20/2025
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 60% display: 80% mobility: 100% workmanship: 80%
Source: Frandroid
FR→ENPositive: Beautiful display; slim size; light weight; rich set of ports; high performance; long battery life; comfortable keyboard. Negative: High price.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/22/2025
Source: Zive
CZ→ENSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/31/2025
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Jagat Review
ID→ENPositive: Light weight; powerful hardware; high performance; beautiful OLED 120Hz display; decent battery life.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/22/2025
Comment
Intel Arc 140V: A pretty fast integrated graphics adapter that higher-end Intel Lunar Lake family processors employ. This is a direct successor to the Arc 8; it can drive three SUHD 4320p monitors simultaneously via HDMI 2.1, eDP 1.5 and DP 2.1. With the 140V, all 2023 and 2024 games are playable at 1080p on low graphics settings.
Modern games should be playable with these graphics cards at low settings and resolutions. Casual gamers may be happy with these cards.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
Core Ultra 7 258V: An upper mid-range Lunar Lake family processor. It sports 4 new Skymont E-cores and 4 new Lion Cove P-cores running at up to 3.7 GHz and 4.8 GHz respectively, along with the new Arc 140V iGPU and 32 GB of on-package LPDDR5x-8533 RAM. It essentially matches the Core Ultra 7 165U and Core i7-1360P in multi-thread performance and it eats up to 37 W when under short-term workloads.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
