Acer Swift Edge 14 AI SFE14-51
Specifications
Price comparison
Reviews for the Acer Swift Edge 14 AI SFE14-51
Source: Matthew Moniz
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/24/2025
Foreign Reviews
Source: Tuexperto
ES→ENPositive: Light weight; high mobility; excellent battery life; beautiful OLED display. Negative: Relatively high price.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/30/2025
Source: Tweakers
NL→ENPositive: Ultra light weight; great OLED display; decent hardware; rich set of ports; good built quality; high security. Negative: Average performance; short battery life; high price.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/19/2025
Source: Frandroid
FR→ENPositive: Beautiful display; slim size; light weight; rich set of ports; high performance; long battery life; comfortable keyboard. Negative: High price.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/22/2025
Source: Jagat Review
ID→ENPositive: Light weight; powerful hardware; high performance; beautiful OLED 120Hz display; decent battery life.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/22/2025
Comment
Intel Arc 140V: A pretty fast integrated graphics adapter that higher-end Intel Lunar Lake family processors employ. This is a direct successor to the Arc 8; it can drive three SUHD 4320p monitors simultaneously via HDMI 2.1, eDP 1.5 and DP 2.1. With the 140V, all 2023 and 2024 games are playable at 1080p on low graphics settings.
Modern games should be playable with these graphics cards at low settings and resolutions. Casual gamers may be happy with these cards.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
Core Ultra 7 258V: An upper mid-range Lunar Lake family processor. It sports 4 new Skymont E-cores and 4 new Lion Cove P-cores running at up to 3.7 GHz and 4.8 GHz respectively, along with the new Arc 140V iGPU and 32 GB of on-package LPDDR5x-8533 RAM. It essentially matches the Core Ultra 7 165U and Core i7-1360P in multi-thread performance and it eats up to 37 W when under short-term workloads.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
