Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 laptop review - The fastest Snapdragon X Elite challenges AMD's Zen 5

We already tested the Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 with the new Snapdragon X Elite ARM processor, but Samsung also optionally offers its slim multimedia laptop with the fastest Snapdragon processor that is currently available from Qualcomm. The clock rate of all cores has risen to a maximum of 3.8 GHz and its dual-core turbo has risen to 4.2 GHz. In addition, it features the faster version of the Adreno X1-85 GPU.
As it has no additional differences compared to the variant of the Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 which we already tested—apart from its faster SoC, of course—we will primarily be focusing on its CPU/GPU performance in this review. Further information surrounding all of the other sections can be found in our detailed review of the Edge 16 with the X1E-80-100.
Since its launch just a few weeks ago, Samsung has already reduced the laptop's prices massively. The base model with the X1E-80-100 which we already tested now costs only US$1,099.99 instead of US$1,449.99 and today's test device with the X1E-84-100 and a larger 1-TB SSD now only costs US$1,349.99 instead of US$1,749.99. Unfortunately, both variants only come with 16 GB RAM.
Possible competitors compared
Rating | Version | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
81 % | v8 | 09 / 2024 | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100 SD X Elite X1E-84-100, Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS | 1.6 kg | 12.3 mm | 16.00" | 2880x1800 | |
80.2 % | v8 | 07 / 2024 | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | 1.5 kg | 12.3 mm | 16.00" | 2880x1800 | |
84.7 % | v8 | 07 / 2024 | Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M | 1.5 kg | 12.9 mm | 16.00" | 2880x1800 | |
76.7 % | v8 | 07 / 2024 | Medion S10 OLED Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1.6 kg | 17.8 mm | 16.00" | 3840x2400 | |
88.9 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 04 / 2024 | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1.5 kg | 12.5 mm | 16.00" | 2880x1800 | |
91.6 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 03 / 2024 | Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 M3, M3 10-Core GPU | 1.5 kg | 11.5 mm | 15.60" | 2880x1664 |
Please note: We have recently updated our rating system and the results of version 8 are not comparable with the results of version 7. More information is available here.
Performance - The Snapdragon X Elite at 4.2 GHz and with a faster GPU
The Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100 is the fastest mobile processor from Qualcomm, whose 12 cores all feature a maximum clock rate of 3.8 GHz and its dual-core turbo can reach a maximum of 4.2 GHz. As a result, it should be a good bit faster than the X1E-80-100 (max. 3.4 GHz for all cores, max. 4.0 GHz dual-core turbo). Moreover, the X1E-84-100 is equipped with the more powerful version of the X1-85 GPU. For reasons that are unknown, even Samsung's more expensive version of the Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 only comes with 16 GB RAM (LPDDR5x-8448)—which also can't be upgraded.
Testing conditions
Three different energy profiles are available in the Samsung settings: quiet, optimized and high performance. The optimized profile is active by default, which we also used for the following measurements and benchmarks. In high performance mode, only the laptop's multi-core performance benefits (single-core and GPU are almost identical to the weaker profiles) and we also ran the CPU benchmarks using this mode—but the significantly louder fans were disproportionate to the increased performance.
Energy profile | Cinebench 2024 Multi | Cinebench 2024 Single | 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | max. fan noise emissions |
---|---|---|---|---|
Quiet | 793 points | 127 points | 2,425 points | 31.6 dB(A) |
Optimized | 866 points | 127 points | 2,467 points | 31.6 dB(A) |
High performance | 990 points | 129 points | 2,494 points | 42 dB(A) |
Processor - X1E-84-100
The X1E-84-100 is the fastest Snapdragon X Elite chip that Qualcomm currently offers inside laptops (there is also the X1E-00-1DE in the dev kit with a 4.3-GHz dual-core turbo). All 12 of its cores feature a maximum clock rate of 3.8 GHz and its maximum dual-core turbo is 4.2 GHz. The following diagram shows a Cinebench 2024 Multi run in all three energy modes—you can see clearly that the maximum clock rate is only available for a few seconds and it then drops significantly. Even when using the mode high performance, it was permanently only ~2.8 GHz on all cores, so a lot lower than the theoretically possible 3.8 GHz. It seems that the cooling is simply far too limiting in this scenario and the X1E-84-100 cannot make use of its full multi-core potential at all.
But what does this mean for its performance? During the latest Cinebench 2024 multi-core test, its results were only average and the presumably weaker X1E-80-100 inside the Vivobook S 15 was 14 % faster than the X1E-84-100 using high performance mode. All-in-all, the Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 was on par with AMD's new Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 inside the Zenbook S 16 at 28 watts. Apple's passively-cooled M3 chip inside its direct competitor—the MacBook Air 15—was beaten by a long shot, however, the M3 Pro inside the MacBook Pro 16 was faster.
During the single-core tests, the laptop's performance was very good overall, but its advantage over the X1E-80-100 was only small. It beat the Meteor Lake chips as well as the latest Zen 5 chips. We are curious to see how the upcoming Lunar Lake CPUs from Intel will perform. Apple's M3 chips still came ahead in the single-core tests, and the manufacturer's lead will likely increase even further with its upcoming M4 chips.
Cinebench 2024 / CPU Multi Core | |
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WV | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon (Full Performance 50W) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon (Performance 45W) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100 (High Performance) | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 |
Cinebench 2024 / CPU Single Core | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro | |
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100 (High Performance) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WV | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 |
Geekbench 6.4 / Multi-Core | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100 (High Performance) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro | |
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI (6.2.1) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WV (6.2.1) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W (6.2.1) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 (6.2.1) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 (6.2.1) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 (6.2.1) | |
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 | |
Medion S10 OLED (6.2.1) |
Geekbench 6.4 / Single-Core | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro | |
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100 (High Performance) | |
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI (6.2.1) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WV (6.2.1) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100 | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W (6.2.1) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
Medion S10 OLED (6.2.1) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 (6.2.1) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 (6.2.1) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 (6.2.1) |
In addition to the native CPU tests, we also carried out our usual CPU benchmarks, which had to be emulated on the Snapdragon processor and are therefore not representative of its actual performance. However, there simply aren't native versions of all applications, so how it runs emulated apps is also not completely unimportant. As expected, AMD and Intel had a clear advantage in this scenario.
Its performance isn't reduced in battery mode. Further benchmarks are available in our tech section.
Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Medion S10 OLED | |
Average of class Multimedia | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100 | |
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 -9! | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
Average of class Multimedia (4861 - 30789, n=89, last 2 years) | |
Medion S10 OLED | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100 (n=1) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 | |
Average of class Multimedia (878 - 2290, n=80, last 2 years) | |
Medion S10 OLED | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100 (n=1) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
Medion S10 OLED | |
Average of class Multimedia (1887 - 11924, n=73, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100 (n=1) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
Medion S10 OLED | |
Average of class Multimedia (341 - 853, n=73, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100 (n=1) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Average of class Multimedia (856 - 5224, n=80, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
Medion S10 OLED | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100 (n=1) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
Average of class Multimedia (99.6 - 323, n=75, last 2 years) | |
Medion S10 OLED | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100 (n=1) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100 (n=1) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
Average of class Multimedia (100 - 557, n=73, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Medion S10 OLED | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
Average of class Multimedia (29095 - 130368, n=68, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Medion S10 OLED | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100 (n=1) |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
Average of class Multimedia (3398 - 7545, n=68, last 2 years) | |
Medion S10 OLED | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100 (n=1) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
Average of class Multimedia (5.26 - 34.3, n=67, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Medion S10 OLED | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100 (n=1) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
Average of class Multimedia (23.9 - 146.7, n=69, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
Medion S10 OLED | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100 (n=1) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100 (n=1) | |
Average of class Multimedia (0.3604 - 0.947, n=67, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Medion S10 OLED | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
Average of class Multimedia | |
Medion S10 OLED | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
Average of class Multimedia (5121 - 50388, n=66, last 2 years) | |
Medion S10 OLED | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100 (n=1) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
Medion S10 OLED | |
Average of class Multimedia (14528 - 201874, n=67, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100 (n=1) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
Average of class Multimedia (1188 - 8623, n=67, last 2 years) | |
Medion S10 OLED | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100 (n=1) |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Average of class Multimedia (21547 - 181505, n=67, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Medion S10 OLED | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100 (n=1) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
Average of class Multimedia (1240 - 28794, n=67, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Medion S10 OLED | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100 (n=1) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
Medion S10 OLED | |
Average of class Multimedia (9903 - 105740, n=66, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100 (n=1) |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Average of class Multimedia (26066 - 169946, n=67, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100 (n=1) | |
Medion S10 OLED | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
Medion S10 OLED | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Average of class Multimedia (440 - 2022, n=67, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100 (n=1) |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
Average of class Multimedia (2759 - 26875, n=67, last 2 years) | |
Medion S10 OLED | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100 (n=1) |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
Average of class Multimedia (12860 - 58844, n=67, last 2 years) | |
Medion S10 OLED | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100 (n=1) |
System performance
The laptop's system performance is generally great and it is a very responsive device. However, its performance may be weaker when running emulated apps and some applications don't run at all. You should check thoroughly in advance whether your desired apps will work on the Snapdragon laptop. Qualcomm itself has its own info page which lists the native apps, and Microsoft also offers a support page.
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
CrossMark / Overall | |
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
Average of class Multimedia (866 - 2255, n=74, last 2 years) | |
Medion S10 OLED | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS (n=1) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Medion S10 OLED | |
Average of class Multimedia (913 - 2050, n=74, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS (n=1) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
Average of class Multimedia (907 - 2795, n=74, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Medion S10 OLED | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS (n=1) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Medion S10 OLED | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Average of class Multimedia (605 - 2094, n=74, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS (n=1) |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS (n=1) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 | |
Average of class Multimedia (136.4 - 545, n=75, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Medion S10 OLED |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS (n=1) | |
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
Average of class Multimedia (133.2 - 353, n=68, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Medion S10 OLED |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Medion S10 OLED | |
Medion S10 OLED | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Average of class Multimedia (254 - 1016, n=80, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS (n=1) | |
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
Average of class Multimedia (21158 - 104459, n=67, last 2 years) | |
Medion S10 OLED | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100 (n=1) |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100 (n=1) | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Average of class Multimedia (24312 - 125604, n=67, last 2 years) | |
Medion S10 OLED |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Average of class Multimedia (24382 - 117933, n=67, last 2 years) | |
Medion S10 OLED | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100 (n=1) |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Medion S10 OLED | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
Average of class Multimedia (7 - 346, n=67, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100 (n=1) |
* ... smaller is better
DPC latencies
We couldn't perform our standardized latency test because the LatencyMon application couldn't be launched on the ARM system. When playing a 4K YouTube video, we at least noted no problems with dropped frames.
Storage device
The SSD capacity of the more expensive Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 model has been increased from 512 to 1024 GB—but it still uses soldered-on UFS 4.0 storage which can't be upgraded. In contrast, the Intel version of the Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 even has two M.2-2280 slots available. There are no advantages for the user in this case. The storage chips inside our test device come from Samsung itself, which is generally fine. In addition, its transfer rates remain completely stable under prolonged load. After first booting up the device, users have 880 GB at their disposal. Further SSD benchmarks are listed here.
* ... smaller is better
Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
Graphics card - Adreno X1-85 with 4.6 TFLOPS
Aside from higher CPU core clock rates, the X1E-84-100 is also equipped with the faster version of the X1-85 GPU that can reach a clock rate of 1.5 GHz (1.2 on other versions of the X1-85). Based on our measurements, its consumption should be around 4 watts higher. Its performance advantage over the slower X1-85 variant was around 15 % during the native test, so the iGPU performs well overall. The new Radeon 890M was about the same, but Apple's M3 GPU (10 cores) was still faster. Its graphics performance remained completely stable both under prolonged load and in battery mode.
The Adreno GPU is totally suitable for everyday use, and playing high-resolution videos is of course no problem. When it comes to gaming, however, there is no real difference between the two Snapdragon GPUs. Emulation certainly plays a role here—compatibility is still limited and some games simply cannot be launched (e.g. F1 23 or F1 24) or there are graphics errors (e.g. Total War: Pharaoh). Further GPU benchmarks are available here.
3DMark Vantage P Result | 24058 points | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 7487 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 6446 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 2181 points | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 590 points | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score | 2467 points | |
Help |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100 | |
Average Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS (n=1) | |
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 | |
Average of class Multimedia (160 - 1042, n=73, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Medion S10 OLED | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom METAL | |
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 | |
Average of class Multimedia (17.8 - 121, n=7, last 2 years) |
* ... smaller is better
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Average of class Multimedia (11 - 121, n=54, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100 |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Average of class Multimedia (9.38 - 141.6, n=69, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Medion S10 OLED |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
Average of class Multimedia (7.61 - 120.5, n=70, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Medion S10 OLED | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 |
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
Average of class Multimedia (13.3 - 213, n=71, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
Medion S10 OLED |
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
Average of class Multimedia (29 - 179.9, n=71, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Medion S10 OLED | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100 | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Low Preset (FSR off) | |
Average of class Multimedia (4.66 - 146.2, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
Medion S10 OLED | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100 | |
Average Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS (n=1) |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Medium Preset | |
Average of class Multimedia (25 - 167, n=12, last 2 years) | |
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100 | |
Average Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS (n=1) |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS diagram
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 103 | 95.4 | 49.5 | 22.4 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 107 | 73 | 41 | 22 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 88.2 | 68.8 | 61 | 52.8 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 56.8 | 27.8 | 17.8 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 36.2 | |||
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 37 | 31 | 30 | 27 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 143 | 56 | 48 | 41 |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 66 | 28 | 26 | 23 |
F1 22 (2022) | 65.9 | 60 | 43.3 | 32 |
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 27 | 22 | 19.3 | 19 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 23.1 | 21.8 | 18.8 | 16.6 |
Total War Pharaoh (2023) | 91.1 | 63.6 |
Emissions - High-frequency fans
Noise emissions
Its fan behavior is exactly the same as on the weaker model of the Galaxy Book4 Edge 16. Both fans spring into action under heavier load and reach a maximum of about 32 dB(A). Subjectively, however, they sound a lot more annoying, as they emit quite a high-frequency noise. When using the mode high performance, the fans give off a maximum of 42 dB(A), which is a lot louder and as we only noted a small performance advantage during the multi-core scenarios, it makes little sense to use this profile. We didn't notice any other electronic noises coming from our test sample.
Noise Level
Idle |
| 24 / 24 / 24 dB(A) |
Load |
| 26.9 / 31.6 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100 Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-84-100 | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01 | Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM | Medion S10 OLED Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7 | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU | Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 M3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP0512Z | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -3% | -12% | -27% | -16% | ||
off / environment * | 24 | 24.6 -3% | 24.7 -3% | 25 -4% | 24.6 -3% | |
Idle Minimum * | 24 | 24.6 -3% | 24.7 -3% | 26 -8% | 24.6 -3% | |
Idle Average * | 24 | 24.6 -3% | 24.7 -3% | 27 -13% | 24.6 -3% | |
Idle Maximum * | 24 | 24.6 -3% | 26.4 -10% | 28 -17% | 26.4 -10% | |
Load Average * | 26.9 | 28.1 -4% | 35.7 -33% | 43 -60% | 40 -49% | |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 31.6 | 32.4 -3% | 36.8 -16% | 42 -33% | ||
Load Maximum * | 31.6 | 32.4 -3% | 36.8 -16% | 48 -52% | 40 -27% | |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 40 |
* ... smaller is better
Temperature
The metal case's temperature remains pleasant when undertaking everyday tasks, but the low fan activity becomes noticeable under load. When gaming, everything remained in the green zone but during the stress test, we measured 53 °C on the underside in the rear area, so you should avoid skin contact in this case. The keyboard also heats up noticeably, but there shouldn't be any limitations during use.
In the stress test, the integrated graphics card remained constant at 1.5 GHz, while the processor cores fluctuated between 1.5-2.5 GHz. The chip temperature itself averaged just under 73 °C.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.1 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 53.5 °C / 128 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.1 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 36.3 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the class Multimedia.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34.8 °C / 94.6 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-6 °C / -10.8 F).
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M | Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 Apple M3, Apple M3 10-Core GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 4% | -7% | -18% | 11% | 12% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 45.1 | 44.3 2% | 46.9 -4% | 55 -22% | 40.9 9% | 44.3 2% |
Maximum Bottom * | 53.5 | 51.6 4% | 53.5 -0% | 55 -3% | 42.6 20% | 43.4 19% |
Idle Upper Side * | 26.3 | 25.1 5% | 29.5 -12% | 32 -22% | 24.5 7% | 23.1 12% |
Idle Bottom * | 26.7 | 25.8 3% | 30.2 -13% | 33 -24% | 24.8 7% | 23.3 13% |
* ... smaller is better
Speakers
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 9% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Medion S10 OLED audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 21% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Power management - Battery life remains a weakness
Power consumption
When idling, the high-end variant of the Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 proved to be a little more frugal than the base model but at full brightness, the ARM model still requires a little more power than the Intel version. When gaming, its consumption is a little higher due to its faster GPU (that uses around 4 watts more).
There were no differences between the two configurations in the stress test; their power limits are the limiting factor here. We measured a maximum of just under 62 watts, which quickly leveled off at 52 watts. The supplied 65-watt power supply unit is therefore sufficient in size. However, the device's standby consumption of almost 1 watt is too high.
Off / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Idle | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Load |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Key:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100 SD X Elite X1E-84-100, Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS, , , 2880x1800, 16" | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01, OLED, 2880x1800, 16" | Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM, OLED, 2880x1800, 16" | Medion S10 OLED Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7, OLED, 3840x2400, 16" | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU, OLED, 2880x1800, 16" | Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 M3, M3 10-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP0512Z, IPS, 2880x1664, 15.6" | Average Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS | Average of class Multimedia | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -5% | -46% | -81% | -17% | -20% | 0% | -110% | |
Idle Minimum * | 3.2 | 4.2 -31% | 5.4 -69% | 7 -119% | 3.6 -13% | 2.15 33% | 3.2 ? -0% | 6.7 ? -109% |
Idle Average * | 4.6 | 5.6 -22% | 10.5 -128% | 10 -117% | 5.7 -24% | 11.2 -143% | 4.6 ? -0% | 11.6 ? -152% |
Idle Maximum * | 6.7 | 7.8 -16% | 10.9 -63% | 19 -184% | 6.1 9% | 11.5 -72% | 6.7 ? -0% | 13.4 ? -100% |
Load Average * | 35 | 28.3 19% | 47.8 -37% | 52 -49% | 52.5 -50% | 35.8 -2% | 35 ? -0% | 70.4 ? -101% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 45 | 38.8 14% | 49.2 -9% | 53.2 -18% | ||||
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 39 | 38.2 2% | 46.7 -20% | 49.2 -26% | ||||
Witcher 3 ultra * | 38.8 | 46.6 -20% | 29.6 24% | |||||
Load Maximum * | 61.4 | 61.9 -1% | 58.6 5% | 95 -55% | 64.7 -5% | 37.2 39% | 61.4 ? -0% | 115.5 ? -88% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Cyberpunk / stress test
Power consumption with external monitor
Runtimes
The monitor's frequency is still fixed at 120 Hz and can't be reduced. During the WLAN test at 150 cd/m², its result of around 8.5 hours is interestingly almost an hour better than the base version, but there were no differences at full brightness. In the video test, on the other hand, we noted 30 minutes less. In general, however, battery life remains a weak point of the large multimedia laptop and both the Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 with the Intel processor and the Asus Zenbook S 16 with the AMD Zen 5 processor managed better runtimes. Apple's MacBook Air 15 M3 is also clearly superior, although it uses an IPS panel at 60 Hz.
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100 SD X Elite X1E-84-100, Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS, 61.8 Wh | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, 61.8 Wh | Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M, 78 Wh | Medion S10 OLED Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 70 Wh | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 76 Wh | Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 M3, M3 10-Core GPU, 66.5 Wh | Average of class Multimedia | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -4% | 18% | -16% | 15% | 54% | 5% | |
H.264 | 840 | 879 5% | 1204 43% | 1144 36% | 1116 33% | 880 ? 5% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 517 | 443 -14% | 640 24% | 436 -16% | 644 25% | 1016 97% | 658 ? 27% |
Load | 121 | 117 -3% | 107 -12% | 100 -17% | 159 31% | 98.8 ? -18% |
Pros
Cons
Verdict - The Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 can't fully make use of the X1E-84-100
The Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 is currently the only laptop on the market to feature the X1E-84-100. The fastest Snapdragon X Elite not only offers higher CPU core clock rates—it also comes with a faster variant of the Adreno GPU. However, the slim Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 can unfortunately not quite use the X1E-84-100 to its full potential and apart from slightly improved single-core performance and slightly better graphics performance, we still don't know what performance potential the processor actually has. The Vivobook S 15 with the X1E-78-100, for example, offers considerably better multi-core performance.
Apart from this, not much has changed about the Galaxy Book4 Edge 16. Its performance capabilities when running native apps are generally very good, but the device isn't cut out for gaming. Its screen is also superb and its fans generally remain deactivated for quite a long time—but they give off a rather high-frequency noise under higher load.
The slim Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 can't entirely make use of the most powerful Qualcomm processor's full potential. As a result, an upgrade makes little sense. Its UFS storage that can't be expanded continues to be annoying—plus, even the high-end variant only comes with 16 GB RAM. Furthermore, its runtimes simply can't keep up with the competition.
We already criticized the use of UFS storage that can't be upgraded on the base model. It is a mystery to us why even Samsung's high-end version of the device only comes with 16 GB RAM. In total, the negatives outweigh the positives in this case—including its disappointing runtimes. We still struggle to recommend this model and the Intel version (from US$1299.99) remains the better choice for most users. It seems that customer interest isn't particularly high either, as Samsung has already massively reduced its price. If you can live with the limitations, then you can definitely profit from this lower price. Alternatives include the Asus Zenbook S 16 and the Apple MacBook Air 15 M3, which both offer better total packages.
Price and availability
The Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 can be ordered directly from Samsung. The base model with 512 GB storage currently costs US$1,099.99; our test version with the more powerful processor and a 1-TB storage capacity is on offer for US$1,349.99.
Please note: We have recently updated our rating system and the results of version 8 are not comparable with the results of version 7. More information is available here.
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100
- 09/01/2024 v8
Andreas Osthoff
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.